Early intervention with azelastine nasal spray may reduce viral load in SARS-CoV-2 infected patients

Discovery of a nasal spray steroid, tixocortol, as an inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 main protease and viral replication

Coronaviruses rely on the viral-encoded chymotrypsin-like main protease (Mpro or 3CLpro) for replication and assembly. Our previous research on Mpro of SARS-CoV-2 identified cysteine 300 (Cys300) as a potential allosteric site of Mpro inhibition. Here, we identified tixocortol (TX) as a covalent modifier of Cys300 which inhibits Mpro activity in vitro as well as in a cell-based Mpro expression assay. Most importantly TX inhibited SARS-CoV-2 replication in ACE2 expressing HeLa cells. Biochemical analysis and kinetic assays were consistent with TX acting as a non-competitive inhibitor. By contrast, TX was a weaker inhibitor and modifier of C300S Mpro, confirming a role for Cys300 in inhibition of WT Mpro but also providing evidence for an additional Cys target. TX pivalate (TP), a prodrug for TX that was previously marketed as a nasal spray, also inhibited SARS-CoV-2 replication in HeLa-ACE2 cells at low micromolar IC50s. These studies suggest that TX and/or TP could possibly be repurposed for the prevention and/or treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Antiviral Potential of Azelastine against Major Respiratory Viruses

The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the subsequent increase in respiratory viral infections highlight the need for broad-spectrum antivirals to enable a quick and efficient reaction to current and emerging viral outbreaks. We previously demonstrated that the antihistamine azelastine hydrochloride (azelastine-HCl) exhibited in vitro antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2. Furthermore, in a phase 2 clinical study, a commercial azelastine-containing nasal spray significantly reduced the viral load in SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals. Here, we evaluate the efficacy of azelastine-HCl against additional human coronaviruses, including the SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant and a seasonal human coronavirus, 229E, through in vitro infection assays, with azelastine showing a comparable potency against both. Furthermore, we determined that azelastine-HCl also inhibits the replication of Respiratory syncytial virus A (RSV A) in both prophylactic and therapeutic settings. In a human 3D nasal tissue model (MucilAirTM-Pool, Epithelix), azelastine-HCl protected tissue integrity and function from the effects of infection with influenza A H1N1 and resulted in a reduced viral load soon after infection. Our results suggest that azelastine-HCl has a broad antiviral effect and can be considered a safe option against the most common respiratory viruses to prevent or treat such infections locally in the form of a nasal spray that is commonly available globally.

Nasal delivery as a strategy for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19

INTRODUCTION

The upper respiratory tract is a major route of infection for COVID-19 and other respiratory diseases. Thus, it appears logical to exploit the nose as administration site to prevent, fight, or minimize infectious spread and treat the disease. Numerous nasal products addressing these aspects have been considered and developed for COVID-19.

AREAS COVERED

This review gives a comprehensive overview of the different approaches involving nasal delivery, i.e., nasal vaccination, barrier products, and antiviral pharmacological treatments that have led to products on the market or under clinical evaluation, highlighting the peculiarities of the nose as application and absorption site and pointing at key aspects of nasal drug delivery.

EXPERT OPINION

From the analysis of nasal delivery strategies to prevent or fight COVID-19, it emerges that, especially for nasal immunization, formulations appear the same as originally designed for parenteral administration, leading to suboptimal results. On the other hand, mechanical barrier and antiviral products, designed to halt or treat the infection at early stage, have been proven effective but were rarely brought to the clinics. If supported by robust and targeted product development strategies, intranasal immunization and drug delivery can represent valid and sometimes superior alternatives to more conventional parenteral and oral medications.