Association of mismatch repair status with survival and response to neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy in rectal cancer

Changes in serum uric acid, serum uric acid/serum creatinine ratio, and gamma-glutamyltransferase might predict the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the predictive value of changes in serum uric acid (SUA), the ratio of serum uric acid to serum creatinine (SUA/SCr), and serum gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) from before to after therapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).

METHODS

Data from 114 LARC patients from January 2016 to December 2021 were included in this retrospective study. All patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and total mesorectal excision (TME). The change in SUA was calculated as a ratio: (SUA level after nCRT-SUA level before nCRT)/SUA level before nCRT. The change ratios of SUA/SCr and GGT were calculated in the same way. The efficacy of nCRT was evaluated by magnetic resonance (MR) and postoperative pathological response. A nonlinear model was used to evaluate whether the change ratios of SUA, SUA/SCr, and GGT were associated with the efficacy of nCRT. The predictive power of the change ratios of SUA, SUA/SCr, and GGT was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were employed to measure the associations between disease-free survival (DFS) and other predictive indicators. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to further compare DFS between groups.

RESULTS

The nonlinear model indicated that the change ratios of SUA, SUA/SCr, and GGT were associated with the efficacy of nCRT. The change ratios of SUA, SUA/SCr, and GGT were used to predict the area under the ROC curve of efficacy for nCRT (0.95, 0.91-0.99), which was better than the prediction by the change ratio of SUA (0.94, 0.89-0.99), SUA/SCr (0.90, 0.84-0.96), or GGT alone (0.86, 0.79-0.93; p < 0.05). The optimal cut-off values of SUA, SUA/SCr, and GGT change were 0.02, 0.01, and 0.04, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier method indicated that patients with SUA, SUA/SCr, or GGT changes greater than the cut-off values had shorter DFS (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Change ratios of SUA, SUA/SCr, or GGT greater than the cut-off values implied a risk of poor pathological response after nCRT and shorter DFS in LARC patients.

Organ Preservation in MSS Rectal Cancer

Rectal cancer is a heterogeneous disease with complex genetic and molecular subtypes. Emerging progress of neoadjuvant therapy has led to increased pathological and clinical complete response (cCR) rates for microsatellite stable (MSS) rectal cancer, which responds poorly to immune checkpoint inhibitor alone. As a result, organ preservation of MSS rectal cancer as an alternative to radical surgery has gradually become a feasible option. For patients with cCR or near-cCR after neoadjuvant treatment, organ preservation can be implemented safely with less morbidity. Patient selection can be done either before the neoadjuvant treatment for higher probability or after with careful assessment for a favorable outcome. Those patients who achieved a good clinical response are managed with nonoperative management, organ preservation surgery, or radiation therapy alone followed by strict surveillance. The oncological outcomes of patients with careful selection and organ preservation seem to be noninferior compared with those of radical surgery, with lower postoperative morbidity. However, more studies should be done to seek better regression of tumor and maximize the possibility of organ preservation in MSS rectal cancer.

Survival outcomes in locally advanced dMMR rectal cancer: surgery plus adjunctive treatment vs. surgery alone

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have shown that deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) rectal cancer may be related to treatment resistance, resulting in a worse prognosis than proficient MMR (pMMR) rectal cancer. The purpose of this study was to explore whether surgery plus other treatments (radiotherapy and chemotherapy) can bring more benefits to these patients than surgery alone.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 168 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent total mesorectal excision was conducted using immunohistochemical methods to determine MMR status and a propensity score matching model to minimize potential confounding factors between subgroups of patients with different treatment regimens. Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank tests, and Cox regression models were used to assess overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in patient subgroups.

RESULTS

Only 6.9% (n = 168) of patients in the total cohort had dMMR rectal adenocarcinoma, and the most common cause of dMMR was a PMS2 deletion (103, 61.3%). The median DFS of the surgery alone group was 45.7 months (IQR, 40.9 to 77.8), and the median DFS of the surgery plus other treatment group was 43.9 months (IQR, 14.2 to 80.1). The surgery alone group was superior to the surgery plus other treatment group (HR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.38; p = 0.005). There was no significant difference in OS (45.8 (IQR, 41.0 to 79.8) vs. 45.9 (IQR, 38.5 to 80.3)) between the two groups (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.23 to 1.40; p = 0.263).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with locally advanced dMMR rectal adenocarcinoma, compared with surgery alone, surgery plus other treatment options (radiotherapy and chemotherapy) do not grant long-term survival benefits but rather shorten DFS.

Locally advanced rectal cancer with dMMR/MSI-H may be excused from surgery after neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 monotherapy: a multiple-center, cohort study

Objective

Examine patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) who received neoadjuvant immunotherapy (nIT), and compare the outcomes of those who chose a watch-and-wait (WW) approach after achieving clinical complete response (cCR) or near-cCR with those who underwent surgery and were confirmed as pathological complete response (pCR).

Methods

LARC patients with dMMR/MSI-H who received nIT were retrospectively examined. The endpoints were 2-year overall survival (OS), 2-year disease-free survival (DFS), local recurrence (LR), and distant metastasis (DM). The efficacy of programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor, immune-related adverse events (irAEs), surgery-related adverse events (srAEs), and enterostomy were also recorded.

Results

Twenty patients who received a PD-1 inhibitor as initial nIT were examined. Eighteen patients (90%) achieved complete response (CR) after a median of 7 nIT cycles, including 11 with pCR after surgery (pCR group), and 7 chose a WW strategy after evaluation as cCR or near-cCR (WW group). Both groups had median follow-up times of 25.0 months. Neither group had a case of LR or DM, and the 2-year DFS and OS in each group was 100%. The two groups had similar incidences of irAEs (P=0.627). In the pCR group, however, 2 patients (18.2%) had permanent colostomy, 3 (27.3%) had temporary ileostomy, and 2 (18.2%) had srAEs.

Conclusion

Neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade had high efficacy and led to a high rate of CR in LARC patients with dMMR/MSI-H. A WW strategy appears to be a safe and reliable option for these patients who achieve cCR or near-cCR after nIT.

Neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade with sintilimab in mismatch-repair deficient, locally advanced rectal cancer: an open-label, single-centre phase 2 study

BACKGROUND

The current standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer is neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by radical surgery, but this approach can lead to multiple complications. We aimed to investigate the clinical activity and safety of neoadjuvant therapy with sintilimab, a single-agent PD-1 antibody, in patients with mismatch-repair deficient locally advanced rectal cancer.

METHODS

This open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study was done at the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China. Patients aged 18-75 years with mismatch-repair deficient or microsatellite instability-high locally advanced rectal cancer were enrolled and received neoadjuvant sintilimab monotherapy (200 mg by intravenous infusion) every 21 days. After an initial four cycles of treatment, patients and clinicians could choose one of the following options: total mesorectal excision surgery, followed by four cycles of adjuvant sintilimab with or without CapeOX chemotherapy (capecitabine 1000 mg/m², orally administered twice daily on days 1-14; oxaliplatin 130 mg/m², intravenously administered on day 1 every 3 weeks), determined by clinicians; or another four cycles of sintilimab followed by radical surgery or observation (only for patients with a clinical complete response; also known as the watch and wait strategy). The primary endpoint was the complete response rate, which included both a pathological complete response after surgery and a clinical complete response after completion of sintilimab treatment. Clinical response was evaluated by digital rectal examination, MRI, and endoscopy. Response was assessed in all patients who received treatment at least until the first tumour response assessment, after the first two cycles of sintilimab. Safety was analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of treatment. This trial is closed to enrolment and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04304209).

FINDINGS

Between Oct 19, 2019, and June 18, 2022, 17 patients were enrolled and received at least one dose of sintilimab. The median age was 50 years (IQR 35-59) and 11 (65%) of 17 patients were male. One patient was excluded from efficacy analyses because they were lost to follow-up after the first sintilimab cycle. Of the remaining 16 patients, six underwent surgery, of whom three had a pathological complete response. Nine other patients had a clinical complete response and chose the watch and wait strategy. One patient had a serious adverse event and discontinued treatment; this patient did not have a complete clinical response and refused to undergo surgery. A complete response was thus noted for 12 (75%; 95% CI 47-92) of 16 patients. One of the three patients who underwent surgery but did not have a pathological complete response showed an increase in tumour volume after the initial four cycles of sintilimab (at which point they underwent surgery); this patient was deemed to have primary resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors. After a median follow-up of 17·2 (IQR 8·2-28·5) months, all patients were alive and none had disease recurrence. Only one (6%) patient had a grade 3-4 adverse event, which was deemed a serious adverse event (grade 3 encephalitis).

INTERPRETATION

The preliminary results of this study suggest that anti-PD-1 monotherapy is effective and tolerable for patients with mismatch-repair deficient locally advanced rectal cancer and could potentially spare some patients from radical surgery. Longer treatment courses might be needed to achieve maximum effects in some patients. Longer follow-up is also needed to observe the duration of response.

FUNDING

The National Natural Science Foundation of China, CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences, Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou, and Innovent Biologics.

Clinical significance of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced colorectal cancer patients with deficient mismatch repair: possibly residual value in the era of immunotherapy

Background

Deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) or microsatellite instability is one of the well-established molecular biomarkers in colorectal cancer (CRC). The efficiency of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in locally advanced colorectal cancer (LACC) patients with dMMR is unclear.

Objectives

We assessed the tumor response and clinical outcome in LACC patients with dMMR received NAC.

Design

Retrospective, single-center analysis.

Methods

From 2013 to 2018, a total of 577 LACC patients with dMMR who underwent radical surgery were identified. Among them, 109 patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy were further screened out for analysis. According to whether receiving NAC or not, 109 patients were divided into two groups with the purpose of retrospectively analyzing their characteristics, treatment, and survival results, especially the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 5-year overall survival.

Results

Baseline characteristics were matched between the two groups. One of 40 patients in NAC group recurred, while 13 of 69 patients in non-NAC group recurred. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that NAC (hazard ratio: 0.115; 95% confidence interval: 0.015-0.897; p = 0.039) was independent influence factor for DFS. In NAC group, there were 13/40 (32.5%) patients for tumor regression grade 1 and 27/40 (67.5%) patients converted clinical positive N-stage into negative N-stage.

Conclusion

In this study, NAC was associated with better tumor downstaging and longer 5-year DFS in LACC patients with dMMR. Consequently, NAC might be an additional treatment choice when it comes to such patients in the future.

Potential risks associated with the use of ionizing radiation for imaging and treatment of colorectal cancer in Lynch syndrome patients

The aim of this review is to investigate the literature pertaining to the potential risks of low-dose ionizing radiation to Lynch syndrome patients by use of computed tomography (CT), either diagnostic CT colonography (CTC), standard staging CT or CT surveillance. Furthermore, this review explores the potential risks of using radiotherapy for treatment of rectal cancer in these patients. No data or longitudinal observational studies of the impact of radiation exposure on humans with Lynch syndrome were identified. Limited experimental studies utilizing cell lines and primary cells exposed to both low and high radiation doses have been carried out to help determine radio-sensitivity associated with DNA mismatch repair gene deficiency, the defining feature of Lynch syndrome. On balance, these studies suggest that mismatch repair deficient cells may be relatively radio-resistant (particularly for low dose rate exposures) with higher mutation rates, albeit no firm conclusions can be drawn. Mouse model studies, though, showed an increased risk of developing colorectal tumors in mismatch repair deficient mice exposed to radiation doses around 2 Gy. With appropriate ethical approval, further studies investigating radiation risks associated with CT imaging and radiotherapy relevant doses using cells/tissues derived from confirmed Lynch patients or genetically modified animal models are urgently required for future clinical guidance.

Pathological Complete Response Following Neoadjuvant Tislelizumab Monotherapy in Treatment-Naive Locally Advanced, MMR-Deficient/MSI-High Ascending Colon Cancer: A Case Report

Although recent trials started the use of neoadjuvant immunotherapy (NIT) in instability-high (MSI-H) or mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) early-stage or locally advanced colorectal cancer (LACRC), little data on the treatment strategy of NIT has been shown, and whether the tirelizumab mono-immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) can be used as NIT for patients with LACRC has not been reported as yet. In this study we report on a locally advanced ascending colon cancer case with a history of incomplete intestinal obstruction which achieved a pathologic complete response (pCR) after treated with Tirelizumab as NIT. A 32-year-old man was diagnosed with locally advanced ascending colon cancer with MSI-H and dMMR. An incomplete intestinal obstruction accompanied with hyperpyrexia occurred unexpectedly and was eased by symptomatic treatment. There was no peritonitis or other acute complications. NIT (three cycles of Tirelizumab) was suggested by the MDT board and partial response was achieved according to CT scanning, and pCR was further revealed by postoperative pathology. A ctDNA clearance confirmed the R0 resection and some immunotherapy related predictors were also detected using the NGS method. Our case study contributes to the evidence on the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of f Tirelizumab as a mono ICI for an optional neoadjuvant therapy in patients with MSI-H/dMMR LACRC.

Ionizing Radiation Drives Key Regulators of Antigen Presentation and a Global Expansion of the Immunopeptidome

Little is known about the pathways regulating MHC antigen presentation and the identity of treatment-specific T cell antigens induced by ionizing radiation. For this reason, we investigated the radiation-specific changes in the colorectal tumor cell proteome. We found an increase in DDX58 and ZBP1 protein expression, two nucleic acid sensing molecules likely involved in induction of the dominant interferon response signature observed after genotoxic insult. We further observed treatment-induced changes in key regulators and effector proteins of the antigen processing and presentation machinery. Differential regulation of MHC allele expression was further driving the presentation of a significantly broader MHC-associated peptidome postirradiation, defining a radiation-specific peptide repertoire. Interestingly, treatment-induced peptides originated predominantly from proteins involved in catecholamine synthesis and metabolic pathways. A nuanced relationship between protein expression and antigen presentation was observed where radiation-induced changes in proteins do not correlate with increased presentation of associated peptides. Finally, we detected an increase in the presentation of a tumor-specific neoantigen derived from Mtch1. This study provides new insights into how radiation enhances antigen processing and presentation that could be suitable for the development of combinatorial therapies. Data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD032003.

Association between microsatellite instability and tumor response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer

Purpose

The relationship between microsatellite instability (MSI) and tumor response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in rectal cancer remains unclear. The present study aimed to evaluate the association between MSI and tumor response to nCRT in rectal cancer treatment.

Methods

Patients with rectal cancer from 2 tertiary hospitals who underwent nCRT, followed by radical surgery, were included. The microsatellite status was determined using a PCR-based Bethesda panel. Tumors with a Dworak’s tumor regression grade of 3 or 4 were considered to have a good response. Predictive factors for a good response to nCRT were analyzed.

Results

Of the 1,401 patients included, 910 (65.0%) had MSI results and 1.5% (14 of 910) showed MSI-H. Among all the patients, 519 (37.0%) showed a good response to nCRT. A univariate analysis showed that MSI-H tended to be negatively associated with a good response to nCRT, but no statistical significance was observed (7.1% vs. 24.1%, P = 0.208). Multivariate analysis showed that well-differentiated tumors were the only predictive factor for good response to nCRT (odds ratio [OR], 2.241; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.492–3.364; P < 0.001). MSI status tended to be associated with the response to nCRT (OR, 0.215; 95% CI, 0.027–1.681; P = 0.143).

Conclusion

MSI-H was not associated with response to nCRT in patients with rectal cancer.

Survival outcomes analysis according to mismatch repair status in locally advanced rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

Background

The predictive role of mismatch repair (MMR) status for survival outcomes and sensitivity in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy settings for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has been inconclusive.

Methods

A retrospective cohort of patients with LARC treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) was recruited. After adjusting for baseline characteristics, we used propensity score matching to reduce the effect of potential confounding factors on MMR status. The primary analysis was based on overall survival as the more important endpoint.

Results

This study included 269 patients. Patients with defective MMR (dMMR) were younger (58.5% vs. 60.0%, p=0.0274) and had lower body mass indices (p=0.0091), higher differentiation grades (p=0.0889), and more advanced rectal cancers (clinical T4 or T4b, p=0.0851; M1, p=0.0055) than those with proficient MMR (pMMR). However, propensity score-matched patients with dMMR (p=0.0013) exhibited superior overall survival, even in the M1 subgroup. More importantly, patients with proficient MMR who undergo early pathological downstaging, especially lymph node pathological downstaging, can achieve a prognosis similar to that of patients with dMMR.

Conclusion

The clinical significance of this retrospective study mainly includes two points: (1) Data from our study confirmed that LARC patients with dMMR status had better overall survival rates after nCRT, even in the M1 subgroup. (2) Similar survival outcomes were observed in older and female patients with early lymph node pathological downstaging, regardless of dMMR or pMMR.

Microsatellite instability in rectal cancer: what does it mean? A study of two randomized trials and a systematic review of the literature

Currently, compelling evidence illustrates the significance of determining microsatellite instability (MSI) in colorectal cancer (CRC). The association of MSI with proximal CRC is well established, however, its implications in patients with rectal cancer remain undefined. We therefore aimed to determine the role of MSI with respect to incidence and outcome in patients with rectal cancer, by the examination of patients from two prospective phase III trials: TME trial and PROCTOR-SCRIPT trial (n=1250). No differences in terms of overall survival (HR 1.00, 95%CI 0.69-1.47) and disease-free survival (HR 1.00, 95%CI 0.68-1.45) were observed in patients with MSI compared to microsatellite stable (MSS) rectal cancer. In addition, we performed a literature review to evaluate the overall prevalence, the effect on survival and the response to neo-adjuvant treatment in patients with MSI rectal cancer compared with MSS rectal cancer. The total number of MSI cases in the included studies (including our own) was 1220 (out of 16526 rectal cancer patients), with an overall prevalence of 6.7% (SE 1.19%). Both for overall survival as for disease-free survival there was no impact of MSI status on prognosis (HR 1.00, 95%CI 0.77-1.29 and HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.60-1.22, respectively). The risk ratio for downstaging and pCR showed also no impact of MSI status (RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.86-1.55 and RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.54-1.22 respectively). In conclusion, rectal cancer patients with MSI form a distinct and rare subcategory, however, there is no prognostic effect of MSI in rectal cancer patients.

DNA Mismatch Repair-deficient Rectal Cancer Is Frequently Associated With Lynch Syndrome and With Poor Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy

We evaluated 368 consecutively resected rectal cancers with neoadjuvant therapy for DNA mismatch repair (MMR) protein status, tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy, histopathologic features, and patient survival. Nine (2.4%) rectal cancers were mismatch repair-deficient (MMRD): 8 (89%) Lynch syndrome-associated tumors and 1 (11%) sporadic MLH1-deficient tumor. Of the 9 MMRD rectal cancers, 89% (8/9) had a tumor regression score 3 (poor response) compared with 23% (81/359) of MMR proficient rectal cancers (P<0.001). Patients with MMRD rectal cancer less often had downstaging after neoadjuvant therapy compared with patients with MMR proficient rectal cancer (11% vs. 57%, P=0.007). In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, MMRD in rectal cancer was associated with a 25.11-fold increased risk of poor response to neoadjuvant therapy (tumor regression score 3) (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.08-44.63, P=0.003). In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, the only variables significantly associated with disease-free survival were pathologic stage III disease (hazard ratio [HR]=2.46, 95% CI: 1.54-3.93, P<0.001), College of American Pathologists (CAP) tumor regression score 2 to 3 (HR=3.44, 95% CI: 1.76-6.73, P<0.001), and positive margins (HR=2.86, 95% CI: 1.56-5.25, P=0.001). In conclusion, we demonstrated that MMRD in rectal cancer is an independent predictor of poor response to neoadjuvant therapy and infrequently results in pathologic downstaging following neoadjuvant therapy. We also confirmed that MMRD in rectal cancer is strongly associated with a diagnosis of Lynch syndrome. Our results suggest that MMR status may help to provide a more patient-centered approach when selecting neoadjuvant treatment regimens and may help predict tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy.

Mismatch repair system deficiency is associated with chemoradiotherapy resistance in locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Previous studies have concluded that colorectal cancer patients with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) usually have a good prognosis. However, some studies have suggested that the prognosis of rectal cancer patients with dMMR appears to be worse. Our aim was to investigate chemoradiotherapy resistance in dMMR rectal tumors.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 217 patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma treated with chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision surgery was conducted using immunohistochemistry to determine MMR status and propensity score matching models to reduce potential confounders. Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank test, and Cox regression models were used to assess overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in patient subgroups.

RESULTS

The 3-year DFS rates were 77.1% and 56.7% in the pMMR and dMMR groups, respectively. The pMMR group had significantly better DFS than the dMMR group (hazard ratio [HR], 2.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-3.91; p = 0.019). However, there was no significant difference in OS between the two groups (45.7 [interquartile range, IQR], 39.3-72.1] vs. 47.5 [IQR, 29.5-72.1]) (HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 0.70-2.77; p = 0.35). Neither OS nor DFS was significantly different between the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemoradiotherapy groups.

CONCLUSION

Locally advanced dMMR rectal adenocarcinoma exhibits greater chemoradiotherapy resistance than pMMR.

[Precision medicine and immuno-radiotherapy]

Numerous clinical studies aim to integrate immunotherapy in radiotherapy oncology, either for generating abscopal responses in metastatic patients in combination with radiotherapy, or in the treatment of a locally advanced tumor. The search for biomarkers of response to treatment is a major axis in the development of these therapeutic combinations, to allow the early identification of patients who will benefit from the treatment, in the context of an increasingly personalized approach. We review some of the strategies that can be applied for personalization to combined radiotherapy and immunotherapy treatments.

Immunity, immunotherapy, and rectal cancer: A clinical and translational science review

Rectal cancer remains a challenging disease to treat. Therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), the most frequent presentation, has evolved to include a multimodal approach of radiation, chemotherapy, and surgery. While this approach improves local disease control, the distant recurrence rate is nearly 30% and treatment-related morbidity is substantial, thus underscoring the need for new therapeutic approaches with better efficacy and lower side effects. Immunotherapy could potentially fill this need, but its promise is not yet realized in rectal cancer. In this translational science review, we address what is known about how cytotoxic therapies shape rectal cancer immunity and potentially prime the tumor microenvironment for response to immune checkpoint inhibitors and other immunotherapies. We also address the role of current immunotherapies in colorectal cancer and highlight where novel immunotherapy approaches are currently being evaluated in LARC. Finally, we address important future directions in LARC immunotherapy including the need to define optimal therapeutic sequencing, predictive biomarkers, strategies to limit treatment-related side effects and the potential of gut microbiome manipulation to improve outcomes. In summary, this review provides a framework to guide future research and inform immunotherapy trial design so as to advance rectal cancer care.