Biological data annotation via a human-augmenting AI-based labeling system

A comprehensive survey on deep active learning in medical image analysis

Deep learning has achieved widespread success in medical image analysis, leading to an increasing demand for large-scale expert-annotated medical image datasets. Yet, the high cost of annotating medical images severely hampers the development of deep learning in this field. To reduce annotation costs, active learning aims to select the most informative samples for annotation and train high-performance models with as few labeled samples as possible. In this survey, we review the core methods of active learning, including the evaluation of informativeness and sampling strategy. For the first time, we provide a detailed summary of the integration of active learning with other label-efficient techniques, such as semi-supervised, self-supervised learning, and so on. We also summarize active learning works that are specifically tailored to medical image analysis. Additionally, we conduct a thorough comparative analysis of the performance of different AL methods in medical image analysis with experiments. In the end, we offer our perspectives on the future trends and challenges of active learning and its applications in medical image analysis. An accompanying paper list and code for the comparative analysis is available in https://github.com/LightersWang/Awesome-Active-Learning-for-Medical-Image-Analysis.

A pathologist-AI collaboration framework for enhancing diagnostic accuracies and efficiencies

In pathology, the deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) in clinical settings is constrained by limitations in data collection and in model transparency and interpretability. Here we describe a digital pathology framework, nuclei.io, that incorporates active learning and human-in-the-loop real-time feedback for the rapid creation of diverse datasets and models. We validate the effectiveness of the framework via two crossover user studies that leveraged collaboration between the AI and the pathologist, including the identification of plasma cells in endometrial biopsies and the detection of colorectal cancer metastasis in lymph nodes. In both studies, nuclei.io yielded considerable diagnostic performance improvements. Collaboration between clinicians and AI will aid digital pathology by enhancing accuracies and efficiencies.

Boosting wisdom of the crowd for medical image annotation using training performance and task features

A crucial bottleneck in medical artificial intelligence (AI) is high-quality labeled medical datasets. In this paper, we test a large variety of wisdom of the crowd algorithms to label medical images that were initially classified by individuals recruited through an app-based platform. Individuals classified skin lesions from the International Skin Lesion Challenge 2018 into 7 different categories. There was a large dispersion in the geographical location, experience, training, and performance of the recruited individuals. We tested several wisdom of the crowd algorithms of varying complexity from a simple unweighted average to more complex Bayesian models that account for individual patterns of errors. Using a switchboard analysis, we observe that the best-performing algorithms rely on selecting top performers, weighting decisions by training accuracy, and take into account the task environment. These algorithms far exceed expert performance. We conclude by discussing the implications of these approaches for the development of medical AI.

Opportunities and challenges for deep learning in cell dynamics research

The growth of artificial intelligence (AI) has led to an increase in the adoption of computer vision and deep learning (DL) techniques for the evaluation of microscopy images and movies. This adoption has not only addressed hurdles in quantitative analysis of dynamic cell biological processes but has also started to support advances in drug development, precision medicine, and genome-phenome mapping. We survey existing AI-based techniques and tools, as well as open-source datasets, with a specific focus on the computational tasks of segmentation, classification, and tracking of cellular and subcellular structures and dynamics. We summarise long-standing challenges in microscopy video analysis from a computational perspective and review emerging research frontiers and innovative applications for DL-guided automation in cell dynamics research.

Variational Autoencoders for Biomedical Signal Morphology Clustering and Noise Detection

Accurate estimation of physiological biomarkers using raw waveform data from non-invasive wearable devices requires extensive data preprocessing. An automatic noise detection method in time-series data would offer significant utility for various domains. As data labeling is onerous, having a minimally supervised abnormality detection method for input data, as well as an estimation of the severity of the signal corruptness, is essential. We propose a model-free, time-series biomedical waveform noise detection framework using a Variational Autoencoder coupled with Gaussian Mixture Models, which can detect a range of waveform abnormalities without annotation, providing a confidence metric for each segment. Our technique operates on biomedical signals that exhibit periodicity of heart activities. This framework can be applied to any machine learning or deep learning model as an initial signal validator component. Moreover, the confidence score generated by the proposed framework can be incorporated into different models' optimization to construct confidence-aware modeling. We conduct experiments using dynamic time warping (DTW) distance of segments to validated cardiac cycle morphology. The result confirms that our approach removes noisy cardiac cycles and the remaining signals, classified as clean, exhibit a 59.92% reduction in the standard deviation of DTW distances. Using a dataset of bio-impedance data of 97885 cardiac cycles, we further demonstrate a significant improvement in the downstream task of cuffless blood pressure estimation, with an average reduction of 2.67 mmHg root mean square error (RMSE) of Diastolic Blood pressure and 2.13 mmHg RMSE of systolic blood pressure, with increases of average Pearson correlation of 0.28 and 0.08, with a statistically significant improvement of signal-to-noise ratio respectively in the presence of different synthetic noise sources. This enables burden-free validation of wearable sensor data for downstream biomedical applications.

From function to translation: Decoding genetic susceptibility to human diseases via artificial intelligence

While genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have discovered thousands of disease-associated loci, molecular mechanisms for a considerable fraction of the loci remain to be explored. The logical next steps for post-GWAS are interpreting these genetic associations to understand disease etiology (GWAS functional studies) and translating this knowledge into clinical benefits for the patients (GWAS translational studies). Although various datasets and approaches using functional genomics have been developed to facilitate these studies, significant challenges remain due to data heterogeneity, multiplicity, and high dimensionality. To address these challenges, artificial intelligence (AI) technology has demonstrated considerable promise in decoding complex functional datasets and providing novel biological insights into GWAS findings. This perspective first describes the landmark progress driven by AI in interpreting and translating GWAS findings and then outlines specific challenges followed by actionable recommendations related to data availability, model optimization, and interpretation, as well as ethical concerns.

Which data subset should be augmented for deep learning? a simulation study using urothelial cell carcinoma histopathology images

BACKGROUND

Applying deep learning to digital histopathology is hindered by the scarcity of manually annotated datasets. While data augmentation can ameliorate this obstacle, its methods are far from standardized. Our aim was to systematically explore the effects of skipping data augmentation; applying data augmentation to different subsets of the whole dataset (training set, validation set, test set, two of them, or all of them); and applying data augmentation at different time points (before, during, or after dividing the dataset into three subsets). Different combinations of the above possibilities resulted in 11 ways to apply augmentation. The literature contains no such comprehensive systematic comparison of these augmentation ways.

RESULTS

Non-overlapping photographs of all tissues on 90 hematoxylin-and-eosin-stained urinary bladder slides were obtained. Then, they were manually classified as either inflammation (5948 images), urothelial cell carcinoma (5811 images), or invalid (3132 images; excluded). If done, augmentation was eight-fold by flipping and rotation. Four convolutional neural networks (Inception-v3, ResNet-101, GoogLeNet, and SqueezeNet), pre-trained on the ImageNet dataset, were fine-tuned to binary classify images of our dataset. This task was the benchmark for our experiments. Model testing performance was evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Model validation accuracy was also estimated. The best testing performance was achieved when augmentation was done to the remaining data after test-set separation, but before division into training and validation sets. This leaked information between the training and the validation sets, as evidenced by the optimistic validation accuracy. However, this leakage did not cause the validation set to malfunction. Augmentation before test-set separation led to optimistic results. Test-set augmentation yielded more accurate evaluation metrics with less uncertainty. Inception-v3 had the best overall testing performance.

CONCLUSIONS

In digital histopathology, augmentation should include both the test set (after its allocation), and the remaining combined training/validation set (before being split into separate training and validation sets). Future research should try to generalize our results.

Agreement Between Experts and an Untrained Crowd for Identifying Dermoscopic Features Using a Gamified App: Reader Feasibility Study

BACKGROUND

Dermoscopy is commonly used for the evaluation of pigmented lesions, but agreement between experts for identification of dermoscopic structures is known to be relatively poor. Expert labeling of medical data is a bottleneck in the development of machine learning (ML) tools, and crowdsourcing has been demonstrated as a cost- and time-efficient method for the annotation of medical images.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to demonstrate that crowdsourcing can be used to label basic dermoscopic structures from images of pigmented lesions with similar reliability to a group of experts.

METHODS

First, we obtained labels of 248 images of melanocytic lesions with 31 dermoscopic "subfeatures" labeled by 20 dermoscopy experts. These were then collapsed into 6 dermoscopic "superfeatures" based on structural similarity, due to low interrater reliability (IRR): dots, globules, lines, network structures, regression structures, and vessels. These images were then used as the gold standard for the crowd study. The commercial platform DiagnosUs was used to obtain annotations from a nonexpert crowd for the presence or absence of the 6 superfeatures in each of the 248 images. We replicated this methodology with a group of 7 dermatologists to allow direct comparison with the nonexpert crowd. The Cohen κ value was used to measure agreement across raters.

RESULTS

In total, we obtained 139,731 ratings of the 6 dermoscopic superfeatures from the crowd. There was relatively lower agreement for the identification of dots and globules (the median κ values were 0.526 and 0.395, respectively), whereas network structures and vessels showed the highest agreement (the median κ values were 0.581 and 0.798, respectively). This pattern was also seen among the expert raters, who had median κ values of 0.483 and 0.517 for dots and globules, respectively, and 0.758 and 0.790 for network structures and vessels. The median κ values between nonexperts and thresholded average-expert readers were 0.709 for dots, 0.719 for globules, 0.714 for lines, 0.838 for network structures, 0.818 for regression structures, and 0.728 for vessels.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirmed that IRR for different dermoscopic features varied among a group of experts; a similar pattern was observed in a nonexpert crowd. There was good or excellent agreement for each of the 6 superfeatures between the crowd and the experts, highlighting the similar reliability of the crowd for labeling dermoscopic images. This confirms the feasibility and dependability of using crowdsourcing as a scalable solution to annotate large sets of dermoscopic images, with several potential clinical and educational applications, including the development of novel, explainable ML tools.

Semantic annotation for computational pathology: multidisciplinary experience and best practice recommendations

Recent advances in whole‐slide imaging (WSI) technology have led to the development of a myriad of computer vision and artificial intelligence‐based diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive algorithms. Computational Pathology (CPath) offers an integrated solution to utilise information embedded in pathology WSIs beyond what can be obtained through visual assessment. For automated analysis of WSIs and validation of machine learning (ML) models, annotations at the slide, tissue, and cellular levels are required. The annotation of important visual constructs in pathology images is an important component of CPath projects. Improper annotations can result in algorithms that are hard to interpret and can potentially produce inaccurate and inconsistent results. Despite the crucial role of annotations in CPath projects, there are no well‐defined guidelines or best practices on how annotations should be carried out. In this paper, we address this shortcoming by presenting the experience and best practices acquired during the execution of a large‐scale annotation exercise involving a multidisciplinary team of pathologists, ML experts, and researchers as part of the Pathology image data Lake for Analytics, Knowledge and Education (PathLAKE) consortium. We present a real‐world case study along with examples of different types of annotations, diagnostic algorithm, annotation data dictionary, and annotation constructs. The analyses reported in this work highlight best practice recommendations that can be used as annotation guidelines over the lifecycle of a CPath project.

Efficient cellular annotation of histopathology slides with real-time AI augmentation

In recent years, a steady swell of biological image data has driven rapid progress in healthcare applications of computer vision and machine learning. To make sense of this data, scientists often rely on detailed annotations from domain experts for training artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms. The time-consuming and costly process of collecting annotations presents a sizable bottleneck for AI research and development. HALS (Human-Augmenting Labeling System) is a collaborative human-AI labeling workflow that uses an iterative “review-and-revise” model to improve the efficiency of this critical process in computational pathology.