1
|
Friedrich MU, Baughan EC, Kletenik I, Younger E, Zhao CW, Howard C, Ferguson MA, Schaper FLWVJ, Chen A, Zeller D, Piervincenzi C, Tommasin S, Pantano P, Blanke O, Prasad S, Nielsen JA, Fox MD. Lesions Causing Alice in Wonderland Syndrome Map to a Common Brain Network Linking Body and Size Perception. Ann Neurol 2024; 96:662-674. [PMID: 38949221 DOI: 10.1002/ana.27015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2024] [Revised: 05/28/2024] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 07/02/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Alice in Wonderland syndrome (AIWS) profoundly affects human perception of size and scale, particularly regarding one's own body and the environment. Its neuroanatomical basis has remained elusive, partly because brain lesions causing AIWS can occur in different brain regions. Here, we aimed to determine if brain lesions causing AIWS map to a distributed brain network. METHODS A retrospective case-control study analyzing 37 cases of lesion-induced AIWS identified through systematic literature review was conducted. Using resting-state functional connectome data from 1,000 healthy individuals, the whole-brain connections of each lesion were estimated and contrasted with those from a control dataset comprising 1,073 lesions associated with 25 other neuropsychiatric syndromes. Additionally, connectivity findings from lesion-induced AIWS cases were compared with functional neuroimaging results from 5 non-lesional AIWS cases. RESULTS AIWS-associated lesions were located in various brain regions with minimal overlap (≤33%). However, the majority of lesions (≥85%) demonstrated shared connectivity to the right extrastriate body area, known to be selectively activated by viewing body part images, and the inferior parietal cortex, involved in size and scale judgements. This pattern was uniquely characteristic of AIWS when compared with other neuropsychiatric disorders (family-wise error-corrected p < 0.05) and consistent with functional neuroimaging observations in AIWS due to nonlesional causes (median correlation r = 0.56, interquartile range 0.24). INTERPRETATION AIWS-related perceptual distortions map to one common brain network, encompassing regions critical for body representation and size-scale processing. These findings lend insight into the neuroanatomical localization of higher-order perceptual functions, and may inform future therapeutic strategies for perceptual disorders. ANN NEUROL 2024;96:662-674.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian U Friedrich
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Isaiah Kletenik
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Ellen Younger
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Charlie W Zhao
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Calvin Howard
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Michael A Ferguson
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Frederic L W V J Schaper
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Amalie Chen
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Daniel Zeller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | | | - Silvia Tommasin
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Patrizia Pantano
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
- IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Isernia, Italy
| | - Olaf Blanke
- Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience, Neuro-X Institute, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Sashank Prasad
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Pennsylvania, PA
| | - Jared A Nielsen
- Department of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT
- Neuroscience Center, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT
| | - Michael D Fox
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cocuzza CV, Sanchez-Romero R, Ito T, Mill RD, Keane BP, Cole MW. Distributed network flows generate localized category selectivity in human visual cortex. PLoS Comput Biol 2024; 20:e1012507. [PMID: 39436929 PMCID: PMC11530028 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Revised: 11/01/2024] [Accepted: 09/24/2024] [Indexed: 10/25/2024] Open
Abstract
A central goal of neuroscience is to understand how function-relevant brain activations are generated. Here we test the hypothesis that function-relevant brain activations are generated primarily by distributed network flows. We focused on visual processing in human cortex, given the long-standing literature supporting the functional relevance of brain activations in visual cortex regions exhibiting visual category selectivity. We began by using fMRI data from N = 352 human participants to identify category-specific responses in visual cortex for images of faces, places, body parts, and tools. We then systematically tested the hypothesis that distributed network flows can generate these localized visual category selective responses. This was accomplished using a recently developed approach for simulating - in a highly empirically constrained manner - the generation of task-evoked brain activations by modeling activity flowing over intrinsic brain connections. We next tested refinements to our hypothesis, focusing on how stimulus-driven network interactions initialized in V1 generate downstream visual category selectivity. We found evidence that network flows directly from V1 were sufficient for generating visual category selectivity, but that additional, globally distributed (whole-cortex) network flows increased category selectivity further. Using null network architectures we also found that each region's unique intrinsic "connectivity fingerprint" was key to the generation of category selectivity. These results generalized across regions associated with all four visual categories tested (bodies, faces, places, and tools), and provide evidence that the human brain's intrinsic network organization plays a prominent role in the generation of functionally relevant, localized responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carrisa V. Cocuzza
- Center for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey, United States of America
- Behavioral and Neural Sciences PhD Program, Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey, United States of America
- Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
- Department of Psychiatry, Brain Health Institute, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Ruben Sanchez-Romero
- Center for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Takuya Ito
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - Ravi D. Mill
- Center for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Brian P. Keane
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United States of America
- Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, United States of America
- Department of Brain and Cognitive Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, United States of America
| | - Michael W. Cole
- Center for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hebart MN, Contier O, Teichmann L, Rockter AH, Zheng CY, Kidder A, Corriveau A, Vaziri-Pashkam M, Baker CI. THINGS-data, a multimodal collection of large-scale datasets for investigating object representations in human brain and behavior. eLife 2023; 12:e82580. [PMID: 36847339 PMCID: PMC10038662 DOI: 10.7554/elife.82580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/25/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Understanding object representations requires a broad, comprehensive sampling of the objects in our visual world with dense measurements of brain activity and behavior. Here, we present THINGS-data, a multimodal collection of large-scale neuroimaging and behavioral datasets in humans, comprising densely sampled functional MRI and magnetoencephalographic recordings, as well as 4.70 million similarity judgments in response to thousands of photographic images for up to 1,854 object concepts. THINGS-data is unique in its breadth of richly annotated objects, allowing for testing countless hypotheses at scale while assessing the reproducibility of previous findings. Beyond the unique insights promised by each individual dataset, the multimodality of THINGS-data allows combining datasets for a much broader view into object processing than previously possible. Our analyses demonstrate the high quality of the datasets and provide five examples of hypothesis-driven and data-driven applications. THINGS-data constitutes the core public release of the THINGS initiative (https://things-initiative.org) for bridging the gap between disciplines and the advancement of cognitive neuroscience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin N Hebart
- Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of HealthBethesdaUnited States
- Vision and Computational Cognition Group, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain SciencesLeipzigGermany
- Department of Medicine, Justus Liebig University GiessenGiessenGermany
| | - Oliver Contier
- Vision and Computational Cognition Group, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain SciencesLeipzigGermany
- Max Planck School of Cognition, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain SciencesLeipzigGermany
| | - Lina Teichmann
- Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of HealthBethesdaUnited States
| | - Adam H Rockter
- Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of HealthBethesdaUnited States
| | - Charles Y Zheng
- Machine Learning Core, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of HealthBethesdaUnited States
| | - Alexis Kidder
- Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of HealthBethesdaUnited States
| | - Anna Corriveau
- Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of HealthBethesdaUnited States
| | - Maryam Vaziri-Pashkam
- Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of HealthBethesdaUnited States
| | - Chris I Baker
- Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of HealthBethesdaUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Coetzee JP, Johnson MA, Lee Y, Wu AD, Iacoboni M, Monti MM. Dissociating Language and Thought in Human Reasoning. Brain Sci 2022; 13:brainsci13010067. [PMID: 36672048 PMCID: PMC9856203 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13010067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Revised: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 12/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
What is the relationship between language and complex thought? In the context of deductive reasoning there are two main views. Under the first, which we label here the language-centric view, language is central to the syntax-like combinatorial operations of complex reasoning. Under the second, which we label here the language-independent view, these operations are dissociable from the mechanisms of natural language. We applied continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS), a form of noninvasive neuromodulation, to healthy adult participants to transiently inhibit a subregion of Broca's area (left BA44) associated in prior work with parsing the syntactic relations of natural language. We similarly inhibited a subregion of dorsomedial frontal cortex (left medial BA8) which has been associated with core features of logical reasoning. There was a significant interaction between task and stimulation site. Post hoc tests revealed that performance on a linguistic reasoning task, but not deductive reasoning task, was significantly impaired after inhibition of left BA44, and performance on a deductive reasoning task, but not linguistic reasoning task, was decreased after inhibition of left medial BA8 (however not significantly). Subsequent linear contrasts supported this pattern. These novel results suggest that deductive reasoning may be dissociable from linguistic processes in the adult human brain, consistent with the language-independent view.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John P. Coetzee
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, 401 Quarry Road, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
- VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Polytrauma Division, 3801 Miranda Avenue, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA
| | - Micah A. Johnson
- Department of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Youngzie Lee
- Department of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Allan D. Wu
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
- Brain Research Institute (BRI), University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Marco Iacoboni
- Brain Research Institute (BRI), University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
- Ahmanson-Lovelace Brain Mapping Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Martin M. Monti
- Department of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
- Brain Research Institute (BRI), University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
- Brain Injury Research Center (BIRC), Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-310-825-8546
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hoba S, Fink GR, Zeng H, Weidner R. View Normalization of Object Size in the Right Parietal Cortex. Vision (Basel) 2022; 6:41. [PMID: 35893758 PMCID: PMC9326632 DOI: 10.3390/vision6030041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2022] [Revised: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 06/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Prior knowledge alters perception already on early levels of processing. For instance, judging the display size of an object is affected by its familiar size. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we investigated the neural processes involved in resolving ambiguities between familiar object size and physical object size in 33 healthy human subjects. The familiar size was either small or large, and the object was displayed as either small or large. Thus, the size of the displayed object was either congruent or incongruent with its internally stored canonical size representation. Subjects were asked to indicate where the stimuli appeared on the screen as quickly and accurately as possible, thereby ensuring that differential activations cannot be ascribed to explicit object size judgments. Incongruent (relative to congruent) object displays were associated with enhanced activation of the right intraparietal sulcus (IPS). These data are consistent with but extend previous patient studies, which found the right parietal cortex involved in matching visual objects presented atypically to prototypical object representations, suggesting that the right IPS supports view normalization of objects. In a second experiment, using a parametric design, a region-of-interest analysis supported this notion by showing that increases in size mismatch between the displayed size of an object and its familiar viewing size were associated with an increased right IPS activation. We conclude that the right IPS performs view normalization of mismatched information about the internally stored prototypical size and the current viewing size of an object.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sylvia Hoba
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, INM-3, Research Center Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany; (S.H.); (G.R.F.)
| | - Gereon R. Fink
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, INM-3, Research Center Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany; (S.H.); (G.R.F.)
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne University, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Hang Zeng
- Center for Educational Science and Technology, Beijing Normal University at Zhuhai, Zhuhai 519087, China
| | - Ralph Weidner
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, INM-3, Research Center Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany; (S.H.); (G.R.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Aminoff EM, Baror S, Roginek EW, Leeds DD. Contextual associations represented both in neural networks and human behavior. Sci Rep 2022; 12:5570. [PMID: 35368046 PMCID: PMC8976848 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-09451-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Contextual associations facilitate object recognition in human vision. However, the role of context in artificial vision remains elusive as does the characteristics that humans use to define context. We investigated whether contextually related objects (bicycle-helmet) are represented more similarly in convolutional neural networks (CNNs) used for image understanding than unrelated objects (bicycle-fork). Stimuli were of objects against a white background and consisted of a diverse set of contexts (N = 73). CNN representations of contextually related objects were more similar to one another than to unrelated objects across all CNN layers. Critically, the similarity found in CNNs correlated with human behavior across multiple experiments assessing contextual relatedness, emerging significant only in the later layers. The results demonstrate that context is inherently represented in CNNs as a result of object recognition training, and that the representation in the later layers of the network tap into the contextual regularities that predict human behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shira Baror
- Department of Psychology, Fordham University, Bronx, NY, USA
- Neuroscience Institute, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eric W Roginek
- Department of Computer and Information Sciences, Fordham University, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Daniel D Leeds
- Department of Computer and Information Sciences, Fordham University, Bronx, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|