Reduced dynamic complexity allows structure elucidation of an excited state of KRASG13D

Producing recombinant proteins in Vibrio natriegens

The diversity of chemical and structural attributes of proteins makes it inherently difficult to produce a wide range of proteins in a single recombinant protein production system. The nature of the target proteins themselves, along with cost, ease of use, and speed, are typically cited as major factors to consider in production. Despite a wide variety of alternative expression systems, most recombinant proteins for research and therapeutics are produced in a limited number of systems: Escherichia coli, yeast, insect cells, and the mammalian cell lines HEK293 and CHO. Recent interest in Vibrio natriegens as a new bacterial recombinant protein expression host is due in part to its short doubling time of ≤ 10 min but also stems from the promise of compatibility with techniques and genetic systems developed for E. coli. We successfully incorporated V. natriegens as an additional bacterial expression system for recombinant protein production and report improvements to published protocols as well as new protocols that expand the versatility of the system. While not all proteins benefit from production in V. natriegens, we successfully produced several proteins that were difficult or impossible to produce in E. coli. We also show that in some cases, the increased yield is due to higher levels of properly folded protein. Additionally, we were able to adapt our enhanced isotope incorporation methods for use with V. natriegens. Taken together, these observations and improvements allowed production of proteins for structural biology, biochemistry, assay development, and structure-based drug design in V. natriegens that were impossible and/or unaffordable to produce in E. coli.

High Pressure Promotes Binding of the Allosteric Inhibitor Zn2+-Cyclen in Crystals of Activated H-Ras

In this work, we experimentally investigate the potency of high pressure to drive a protein toward an excited state where an inhibitor targeted for this state can bind. Ras proteins are small GTPases cycling between active GTP-bound and inactive GDP-bound states. Various states of GTP-bound Ras in active conformation coexist in solution, amongst them, state 2 which binds to effectors, and state 1, weakly populated at ambient conditions, which has a low affinity for effectors. Zn2+-cyclen is an allosteric inhibitor of Ras protein, designed to bind specifically to the state 1. In H-Ras(wt).Mg2+.GppNHp crystals soaked with Zn2+-cyclen, no binding could be observed, as expected in the state 2 conformation which is the dominant state at ambient pressure. Interestingly, Zn2+-cyclen binding is observed at 500 MPa pressure, close to the nucleotide, in Ras protein that is driven by pressure to a state 1 conformer. The unknown binding mode of Zn2+-cyclen to H-Ras can thus be fully characterized in atomic details. As a more general conjunction from our study, high pressure x-ray crystallography turns out to be a powerful method to induce transitions allowing drug binding in proteins that are in low-populated conformations at ambient conditions, enabling the design of specific inhibitors.

Comparative analysis of KRAS4a and KRAS4b splice variants reveals distinctive structural and functional properties

KRAS, the most frequently mutated oncogene in human cancer, produces two isoforms, KRAS4a and KRAS4b, through alternative splicing. These isoforms differ in exon 4, which encodes the final 15 residues of the G-domain and hypervariable regions (HVRs), vital for trafficking and membrane localization. While KRAS4b has been extensively studied, KRAS4a has been largely overlooked. Our multidisciplinary study compared the structural and functional characteristics of KRAS4a and KRAS4b, revealing distinct structural properties and thermal stability. Position 151 influences KRAS4a's thermal stability, while position 153 affects binding to RAF1 CRD protein. Nuclear magnetic resonance analysis identified localized structural differences near sequence variations and provided a solution-state conformational ensemble. Notably, KRAS4a exhibits substantial transcript abundance in bile ducts, liver, and stomach, with transcript levels approaching KRAS4b in the colon and rectum. Functional disparities were observed in full-length KRAS variants, highlighting the impact of HVR variations on interaction with trafficking proteins and downstream effectors like RAF and PI3K within cells.

Revealing the mechanism of action of a first-in-class covalent inhibitor of KRASG12C (ON) and other functional properties of oncogenic KRAS by 31P NMR

Individual oncogenic KRAS mutants confer distinct differences in biochemical properties and signaling for reasons that are not well understood. KRAS activity is closely coupled to protein dynamics and is regulated through two interconverting conformations: state 1 (inactive, effector binding deficient) and state 2 (active, effector binding enabled). Here, we use 31P NMR to delineate the differences in state 1 and state 2 populations present in WT and common KRAS oncogenic mutants (G12C, G12D, G12V, G13D, and Q61L) bound to its natural substrate GTP or a commonly used nonhydrolyzable analog GppNHp (guanosine-5'-[(β,γ)-imido] triphosphate). Our results show that GppNHp-bound proteins exhibit significant state 1 population, whereas GTP-bound KRAS is primarily (90% or more) in state 2 conformation. This observation suggests that the predominance of state 1 shown here and in other studies is related to GppNHp and is most likely nonexistent in cells. We characterize the impact of this differential conformational equilibrium of oncogenic KRAS on RAF1 kinase effector RAS-binding domain and intrinsic hydrolysis. Through a KRAS G12C drug discovery, we have identified a novel small-molecule inhibitor, BBO-8956, which is effective against both GDP- and GTP-bound KRAS G12C. We show that binding of this inhibitor significantly perturbs state 1-state 2 equilibrium and induces an inactive state 1 conformation in GTP-bound KRAS G12C. In the presence of BBO-8956, RAF1-RAS-binding domain is unable to induce a signaling competent state 2 conformation within the ternary complex, demonstrating the mechanism of action for this novel and active-conformation inhibitor.

Considerations Around Structure-Based Drug Discovery for KRAS Using DOCK

Molecular docking is a popular computational tool in drug discovery. Leveraging structural information, docking software predicts binding poses of small molecules to cavities on the surfaces of proteins. Virtual screening for ligand discovery is a useful application of docking software. In this chapter, using the enigmatic KRAS protein as an example system, we endeavor to teach the reader about best practices for performing molecular docking with UCSF DOCK. We discuss methods for virtual screening and docking molecules on KRAS. We present the following six points to optimize our docking setup for prosecuting a virtual screen: protein structure choice, pocket selection, optimization of the scoring function, modification of sampling spheres and sampling procedures, choosing an appropriate portion of chemical space to dock, and the choice of which top scoring molecules to pick for purchase.

Crystallographic Studies of KRAS in Complex with Small Molecules and RAS-Binding Proteins

RAS proteins play a vital role in regulating downstream signaling and essential cellular processes, positioning them as key players in normal cellular physiology and disease development. Among the various isoforms of RAS, KRAS stands out as one of the most frequently mutated genes in human cancer. The prevalence of RAS mutations in cancer often involves single amino acid substitutions at codons 12, 13, or 61. These mutations disrupt the RAS protein's inherent ability to transition between its active and inactive states, resulting in a constant activation signal and driving uncontrolled cell growth. Crystallization and structural analysis of KRAS with inhibitors and RAS-binding proteins play a pivotal role in unraveling the structural and mechanistic details of KRAS function, aiding in drug discovery efforts, and advancing our understanding of KRAS-driven diseases. Here, we present our experimental methodology for crystallizing KRAS in the presence of covalent or non-covalent small molecules and proteins acting as effectors or regulators of RAS. We detail the techniques for successful crystallization and the subsequent optimization of crystallization conditions. The resulting crystals and their structures will provide valuable insights into the key interactions between KRAS and its partner proteins or potential inhibitors, offering a foundation for developing targeted therapies that are more potent and selective against KRAS-driven cancers.