Park I, Oh S, Nam H, Celi P, Lillehoj HS. Antimicrobial activity of sophorolipids against Eimeria maxima and Clostridium perfringens, and their effect on growth performance and gut health in necrotic enteritis.
Poult Sci 2022;
101:101731. [PMID:
35176703 PMCID:
PMC8851262 DOI:
10.1016/j.psj.2022.101731]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2021] [Revised: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The in vitro antimicrobial activity of sophorolipids (SLs) against Eimeria maxima and Clostridium perfringens, and the in vivo effects of SLs on growth performance and gut health in necrotic enteritis (NE)-afflicted broiler chickens were studied. To test the direct killing effects of SLs on enteric pathogens, 2.5 × 105 freshly prepared sporozoites of each Eimeria acervulina, E. maxima, and E. tenella were placed in each well of a 96-well plate, and the vegetative stage of Clostridium perfringens was prepared at 1 × 109 cfu/well. Four different SLs (C18:1 lactonic diacetyled SL [SL1], C18:1 deacetyled SL [SL2], C18:1 monoacetyled SL [SL3], and C18:1 diacetyled SL [SL4]), and 2 anticoccidial chemical controls, decoquinate and monensin, were evaluated at 3 dose levels (125 µg/mL, 250 µg/mL, and 500 µg/mL). Samples were incubated at 41°C for 3 h, and microbial survival ratios were measured by using a cell counter to quantify the number of live microbes stained by fluorescent dye. A total of 336 (0-day-old) male commercial broiler chickens were used to assess the effects of SLs in vivo. Chickens were randomly allocated to 6 treatment groups (7 chickens per cage, 8 cages per treatment) as follows: a control group which received a basal diet (CON), a negative control group (NC) which received a basal diet and NE challenge, and 4 SL treatment groups with NE (NC+SL1, NC+SL2, NC+SL3, and NC+SL4). The inclusion rates of SLs in each group were 200 mg/kg of feed. NE-induced chickens were orally infected with E. maxima (10,000 oocysts/chicken) on d 14, followed by C. perfringens (1 × 109 cfu/chicken) on d 19. Disease parameters measured included gut lesion scores, intestinal cytokine production, and level of tight junction protein expression. Data were analyzed using a Mixed Model (PROC MIXED) in SAS. In vitro (Experiment 1), all SLs dose-dependently decreased (P < 0.001) the viability of the three species of Eimeria sporozoites and C. perfringens. In vivo (Experiment 2), dietary SLs increased (P < 0.001) body weight and average daily gain of broiler chickens infected with NE. Dietary SL1 and SL4s increased (P < 0.05) feed conversion ratio compared to NC. Furthermore, SL1 and SL4 decreased (P < 0.05) gut lesion scores in combination with increased expression of IL1β, IL8, TNFSF15, and IL10 genes (P < 0.05) in NE-afflicted chickens. Overall, dietary SLs promoted growth performance, intestinal immune responses, and intestinal barrier integrity of NE-afflicted, young broiler chickens.
Collapse