Effect of imidafenacin on the urodynamic parameters of patients with indwelling bladder catheters due to spinal cord injury

Urodynamic effect of vibegron on neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction in individuals with spinal cord injury: A retrospective study

STUDY DESIGN

A Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effects of vibegron on urodynamic parameters of individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI).

SETTING

The National Hospital Organization, Murayama Medical Center, Japan.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the urodynamic parameters of 31 individuals with SCI within one year after injury, who were diagnosed with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) according to a urodynamic study (UDS), and prescribed vibegron between December 2018 and December 2020. Treatment criteria were as follows: cystometric capacity of <200 mL, bladder compliance of <20 mL/cmH₂O, and/or presence of detrusor overactivity in the first UDS. We compared urodynamic data before and after vibegron treatment.

RESULTS

Vibegron administration increased the maximum cystometric capacity (MCC) (median, from 185.0 to 340.0 mL, P = 0.001), bladder compliance (median, from 8.3 to 20.0 mL/cmH₂O, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Vibegron therapy improved the bladder capacity and bladder compliance of individuals with NLUTD and SCI.

The Efficacy and Safety of Mirabegron for the Treatment of Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background and Objective: Over the past few years, mirabegron has been increasingly used as a therapeutic option for neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction. Here, we carried out a meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of mirabegron for the treatment of neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction.

Methods: We used a range of databases to retrieve randomized controlled trials (RCTs) relating to mirabegron in patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library; our strategy conformed to the PICOS (populations, interventions, comparators, outcomes, and study designs) strategy.

Results: Our analyses involved four RCTs involving 245 patients. We found that mirabegron treatment resulted in a significant improvement in bladder compliance [mean difference (MD) = 19.53, 95% confidence interval (CI): 14.19 to 24.87, P < 0.00001], urinary incontinence episodes (MD = −0.78, 95% CI: −0.89 to −0.67, P < 0.00001) and Incontinence Quality of Life (I-QOL) (MD = 8.02, 95% CI: 3.20 to 12.84, P = 0.001). Significant differences were detected in terms of Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) (MD = −0.54, 95% CI: −1.46 to 0.39, P = 0.26) and urinary urgency episodes (MD = −0.72, 95% CI: −3.1 to 1.66, P = 0.55). With regard to safety, there were no significant differences between mirabegron and control groups in terms of the incidence of drug-related adverse events [odds ratio (OR): 0.83, 95% CI: 0.43 to 1.59, P = 0.57], arrhythmias (OR: 1.27, 95% CI: 0.37 to 4.38, P = 0.70), hypertension (OR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.13 to 3.82, P = 0.68), or post-voiding residual volume (MD: 1.62, 95% CI: −9.00 to 12.24, P = 0.77).

Conclusion: Mirabegron is an efficacious and safe treatment for patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction.

Cardiovascular safety of mirabegron in individuals treated for spinal cord injury- or multiple sclerosis-induced neurogenic detrusor overactivity

PURPOSE

To analyze cardiovascular safety of mirabegron in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI)- and multiple sclerosis (MS)-induced neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

METHODS

Seventy-eight patients were enrolled into the study, and 66 of them were included into the final analysis. In 49 (74.2%), NDO developed due to suprasacral SCI, 17 (25.8%) suffered from NDO due to MS. Eleven patients were previously treated for hypertension and one for arrhythmia. All study participants received placebo for 2 weeks run-in period. Subsequently, eligible subjects were randomized for 4 weeks of active treatment with mirabegron 50 mg once daily (Group A; n = 32) or placebo (Group B; n = 34). Data from resting electrocardiography (ECG), 24-h ECG and blood pressure monitoring, and echocardiographic examination, were used for cardiovascular safety assessment. All reported variables were evaluated at time of randomization and at the end of the study. Longitudinal changes of variables within the groups and differences between the groups were assessed using nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test, and p ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

No statistically significant longitudinal changes were found in safety variables, except for prolongation of QT interval in placebo group (p = 0.0328) recorded by resting ECG. No significant difference between the Groups A and B, in any of the variables, was observed. A single cardiovascular study drug-related adverse event was recorded in a patient with cervical SCI (3.13%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that mirabegron can be safely used in the treatment of patients with SCI- and MS-induced NDO.

Sample size calculation and blinded recalculation for analysis of covariance models with multiple random covariates

When testing for superiority in a parallel-group setting with a continuous outcome, adjusting for covariates is usually recommended. For this purpose, the analysis of covariance is frequently used, and recently several exact and approximate sample size calculation procedures have been proposed. However, in case of multiple covariates, the planning might pose some practical challenges and pitfalls. Therefore, we propose a method, which allows for blinded re-estimation of the sample size during the course of the trial. Simulations confirm that the proposed method provides reliable results in many practically relevant situations, and applicability is illustrated by a real-life data example.

Efficacy and safety of mirabegron for the treatment of neurogenic detrusor overactivity-Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

AIMS

To assess the efficacy and safety of mirabegron in the treatment of neurogenic detrusor overactivity.

METHODS

This prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted in three tertiary centers, and included 78 patients suffering from spinal cord injury or multiple sclerosis. Patients were randomized for Mirabegron 50 mg (Group A) or placebo (Group B). Urodynamic parameters, the 24 h pad-weight test, and patient-reported outcomes were assessed. Safety assessments included monitoring the incidence and severity of adverse events. Changes in time and differences between groups were assessed with nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance; P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

In total, 66 patients were eligible for inclusion in the final analysis. There was a significant increase of volume at the first detrusor contraction (P = 0.00047) and an improvement in bladder compliance (P = 0.0041) in the mirabegron group compared with the placebo-treated group, whereas the increase in cystometric capacity did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.061). There was a clear tendency to reduced urine leakage (P = 0.056) in Group A. There were significant changes in all the patient-reported outcomes, favoring the mirabegron group. The incidence of drug-related adverse events was 3.13%.

CONCLUSIONS

Mirabegron (50 mg) improved both urodynamic variables and patient-reported outcomes in patients with NDO. The treatment was tolerated well.

Nanofiber Scaffolds as Drug Delivery Systems to Bridge Spinal Cord Injury

The complex pathophysiology of spinal cord injury (SCI) may explain the current lack of an effective therapeutic approach for the regeneration of damaged neuronal cells and the recovery of motor functions. A primary mechanical injury in the spinal cord triggers a cascade of secondary events, which are involved in SCI instauration and progression. The aim of the present review is to provide an overview of the therapeutic neuro-protective and neuro-regenerative approaches, which involve the use of nanofibers as local drug delivery systems. Drugs released by nanofibers aim at preventing the cascade of secondary damage (neuro-protection), whereas nanofibrous structures are intended to re-establish neuronal connectivity through axonal sprouting (neuro-regeneration) promotion, in order to achieve a rapid functional recovery of spinal cord.