Geographically-stratified HIV-1 group M pol subtype and circulating recombinant form sequences

Transmitted drug resistance and subtype patterns of viruses from reported new HIV diagnoses in Germany, 2017-2020

BACKGROUND

The transmission of resistant HIV variants jeopardizes the effective use of antiretrovirals for therapy and prophylaxis. Molecular surveillance of new HIV diagnoses with a focus on prevalence and type of resistance associated mutations and the subtype of circulating viruses is mandatory.

METHOD

From 2017 to 2020, 11,527 new HIV diagnoses were reported in Germany to the Robert Koch Institute (RKI). Protease (PR) and reverse-transcriptase (RT) sequences were obtained from 4559 (39.6%) cases, and PR, RT and integrase (IN) sequences were obtained from 3097 (26.9%) cases. The sequences were analyzed with data from the national HIV reports.

RESULTS

Among all cases in the analysis, the proportion of primary resistance was 4.3% for nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), 9.2% for non-NRTI (NNRTIs), 3.3% for protease inhibitors (PIs) and 1.4% for integrase inhibitors (INIs). Dual-class resistance was highest for NRTIs/NNRTIs with 1.2%. There was no trend in the proportion of viruses resistant to drug classes. Most individual key mutations associated with relevant resistance had a prevalence below 1% including K65R (0.1%) and M184V (0.6%). A notable exception was K103NS, with a prevalence of 2.9% and a significant increase (pTrend=0.024) during 2017-2020. In this period, diagnoses of infections with HIV-1 subtype B were the most common at 58.7%, but its prevalence was declining (pTrend=0.049) while the frequency of minority subtypes (each < 1%) increased (pTrend=0.007). Subtype B was highest (75.6%) in men who have sex with men (MSM) and lowest in reported heterosexual transmissions (HETs, 22.6%).

CONCLUSION

The percentage of primary resistance was high but at a stable level. A genotypic determination of resistance is therefore still required before the start of therapy. The subtype diversity of circulating HIV-1 is increasing.

HIV and Drug-Resistant Subtypes

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) is a human viral infectious disease caused by the positive-sense single-stranded (ss) RNA Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) (Retroviridae family, Ortervirales order). HIV-1 can be distinguished into various worldwide spread groups and subtypes. HIV-2 also causes human immunodeficiency, which develops slowly and tends to be less aggressive. HIV-2 only partially homologates to HIV-1 despite the similar derivation. Antiretroviral therapy (ART) is the treatment approved to control HIV infection, based on multiple antiretroviral drugs that belong to different classes: (i) NNRTIs, (ii) NRTIs, (iii) PIs, (iv) INSTIs, and (v) entry inhibitors. These drugs, acting on different stages of the HIV life cycle, decrease the patient's total burden of HIV, maintain the function of the immune system, and prevent opportunistic infections. The appearance of several strains resistant to these drugs, however, represents a problem today that needs to be addressed as best as we can. New outbreaks of strains show a widespread geographic distribution and a highly variable mortality rate, even affecting treated patients significantly. Therefore, novel treatment approaches should be explored. The present review discusses updated information on HIV-1- and HIV-2-resistant strains, including details on different mutations responsible for drug resistance.

Identification and genomic characterization of a novel HIV-1 unique recombinant form (CRF01_AE/CRF07_BC) in Zhejiang Province, China

Mutation and recombination are important mechanisms leading to the frequent evolution and genetic diversity of viruses as HIV-1. In this study, we identified the near full-length genomic characterization of a novel HIV-1 unique recombinant form (URF) strain (Sample ID: ZJ20202195/ZJ/CHN/2020, hereafter referred to as ZJ20202195) isolated during the HIV-1 molecular surveillance in 2020 in Zhejiang Province, China, through different recombination analysis tools and phylogenetic analysis. Our results amply proved that the near full-length genome (NFLG) sequence of ZJ20202195 was a novel HIV-1 unique recombinant form (URF) consisting of CRF01_AE and CRF07_BC subtype, and delimited three recombinant segments, of which the Segment I (HXB2:776-5559 nucleotide (nt)) and Segment III (HXB2:6224-9412 nt) were mainly originated from CRF01_AE cluster g4a strains prevalent in China and Segment II (HXB2:5560-6223 nt) was from CRF07_BC subtype. Overall, our findings provide insight and a scientific basis in the genetic diversity and accurate determination of HIV-1 recombinant strains in China.

HIV-1 Circulating Recombinant Forms (CRFs) and Unique Recombinant Forms (URFs) in Israel, 2010-2018

Monitoring HIV-1 circulating recombinant forms (CRFs) and unique recombinant forms (URFs) is important for disease surveillance. Recombination may affect prevention efforts and interfere with the diagnosis and treatment of HIV-1 infection. Here, we characterized the epidemiology of HIV-1 CRFs and URFs in Israel. Partial pol sequences from treatment naïve patients diagnosed in 2010−2018 were assessed using the recombinant identification program (RIP), the recombinant detection program (RDP5), and using the maximum-likelihood phylogenetic method, using 410 reference sequences obtained from the Los Alamos database. CRFs and URFs were identified in 11% (213/1940) of all sequenced cases. The median age at diagnosis was 38 (30−47) years, 61% originated from Israel, and 82% were male. The most common were CRF02_AG (30.5%), CRF01_AE (16.9%), and the more complex forms CRF01_AE/CRF02_AG/A3 (10.8%) and B/F1 (7%). A significant increase in their overall proportion was observed in recent years (8.1% in 2010−2012, 20.3% in 2016−2018, p < 0.001). This increase was most prominent in individuals carrying CRF02_AG (2.5% in 2010−2015, 9.8% in 2016−2018, p < 0.001). Men who have sex with men (MSM) was the most common risk group; however, those infected with the secondary recombinant CRF02_AG/A6 were mainly injecting drug users (IDUs). The most common resistance mutations were K103N (5/213, 2.3%) and E138A (18/213, 8.5%) in the reverse transcriptase. Only E138A was more frequent in the recombinants compared with the classic subtypes and was significantly associated with a specific secondary CRF, CRF02_AG/A4. We concluded that CRFs and URFs were mainly detected in Israeli-born MSM and that an increase in the overall proportion of such HIV-1 sequences could be observed in more recent years.

Spectrum of Atazanavir-Selected Protease Inhibitor-Resistance Mutations

Ritonavir-boosted atazanavir is an option for second-line therapy in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We analyzed publicly available HIV-1 protease sequences from previously PI-naïve patients with virological failure (VF) following treatment with atazanavir. Overall, 1497 patient sequences were identified, including 740 reported in 27 published studies and 757 from datasets assembled for this analysis. A total of 63% of patients received boosted atazanavir. A total of 38% had non-subtype B viruses. A total of 264 (18%) sequences had a PI drug-resistance mutation (DRM) defined as having a Stanford HIV Drug Resistance Database mutation penalty score. Among sequences with a DRM, nine major DRMs had a prevalence >5%: I50L (34%), M46I (33%), V82A (22%), L90M (19%), I54V (16%), N88S (10%), M46L (8%), V32I (6%), and I84V (6%). Common accessory DRMs were L33F (21%), Q58E (16%), K20T (14%), G73S (12%), L10F (10%), F53L (10%), K43T (9%), and L24I (6%). A novel nonpolymorphic mutation, L89T occurred in 8.4% of non-subtype B, but in only 0.4% of subtype B sequences. The 264 sequences included 3 (1.1%) interpreted as causing high-level, 14 (5.3%) as causing intermediate, and 27 (10.2%) as causing low-level darunavir resistance. Atazanavir selects for nine major and eight accessory DRMs, and one novel nonpolymorphic mutation occurring primarily in non-B sequences. Atazanavir-selected mutations confer low-levels of darunavir cross resistance. Clinical studies, however, are required to determine the optimal boosted PI to use for second-line and potentially later line therapy in LMICs.