Minimal intervention dentistry: part 2. Caries risk assessment in adults

A Study to Assess Knowledge, Attitude, and Perception of Dental Practitioners on Minimally Invasive Dentistry Concepts

Background

Minimally invasive dentistry (MID) includes caries detection using caries risk assessment (CRA), early localization of nascent carious sores including necessary and voluntary avoidance, and remineralization of demineralized veneer and dentin when diagnosed early for these reasons. Although the dentistry curriculum prioritizes the benefits of MID in tooth protection, this research is seldom included in classroom instruction.

Aim

The purpose of this research was to gauge the level of understanding that dental professionals have about MID ideas.

Methods

An online questionnaire measuring MID knowledge and application was used to compile the data. The Chi-square tests were run for statistical analysis in the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS).

Results

Just 42.2% of the dentists who replied had MID training during their undergraduate or internship years, and the majority of that training came via lectures (45.2%). The majority (almost 81%) of respondents believed that CRA should be performed on all patients. Differences in knowledge and experience with atraumatic restorative therapy and the sandwich approach for treating caries in permanent teeth and high caries risk children were shown to be statistically significant (P 0.05).

Conclusion

Dentists know about the benefits of MID, but their patients are not reaping those benefits since so many dentists still use the old methods of treating complete caries.

Assessing Adherence to Provider's Recommendations in Caries Risk Assessment and Management: A Retrospective Data Review

AIM

To evaluate the distribution of caries risk category of patients at a dental institution and determine adherence to providers' recommendations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional retrospective review of 1,235 patients records that included data collection on demographics, the sum of the number of decayed, missing due to caries, and filled teeth in the permanent teeth (DMFT), presence of frequent snacking, stimulated salivary flow rate, stimulated saliva pH, saliva buffering capacity, biofilm activity, caries risk category, anti-caries prescription accept/decline, and change in the caries risk category. Statistical analysis was carried out through Pearson's Chi-squared test and linear model ANOVA with a significance level of 0.05.

RESULTS

Pearson's Chi-squared test showed a statistically significant difference in frequency by risk category (p < 0.001) indicating that patients were skewed toward high and extreme caries risk. Linear model ANOVA showed that higher risk categories were associated with lower salivary flow rates (p = 0.010) and higher biofilm activity (p < 0.001). About, 1 out of 3 patients were reported to have frequent snacking (N = 391, 32%). Frequent snacking patients were more likely to present with higher caries risk assessment (p < 0.001), younger age (p < 0.001), and female (p < 0.001). Despite recommendations from the dental student provider, only 27% accepted the anti-cavity prescriptions while 61% declined the recommendation.

CONCLUSION

Distribution of caries risk category is not evenly distributed, but rather skewed toward high and extreme caries risk levels. Despite the identified risks, there is low adherence to the recommendations provided by healthcare providers. The results underscore the necessity for targeted interventions and initiatives aimed at fostering behavioral changes to enhance oral health outcomes.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

There is a high need for targeted interventions and initiatives that promote behavioral changes to enhance oral health outcomes.

Knowledge, attitudes, and practice of dentists on Minimal Intervention Dentistry: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and practice (KAP) of dentists on Minimal Intervention Dentistry (MID).

DATA

Cross-sectional studies that analyzed KAP outcomes on MID principles were included.

SOURCES

Eight databases (Cochrane, DOSS, Embase, LILACS, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) and the grey literature were searched on January 2022.

STUDY SELECTION

Two independent reviewers selected the included studies, initially by screening titles and abstracts and, finally, by full-text reading. The methodological quality of studies was assessed by using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Assessment Checklist for Prevalence Studies. Proportion meta-analysis was conducted using a random effect model for data analysis. Cochran's Q test was used to assess the heterogeneity and the I² statistic for evaluation of true variation due to heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Of 2,079 studies initially identified, twelve were included in the systematic review. Twenty-four statements about MID were included in the meta-analysis, based on data from ten studies (n=1728 participants). The pooled proportion of knowledge on MID was 75.66% (95%CI: 69.33 - 81.48; p<0.01; I²: 97%; Tau2: 0.0456) and of attitudes and practice was 47.95% (95%CI: 38.55 - 57.43; p<0.01; I²: 98%; Tau2: 0.0743). The higher prevalences rates were in the "knowledge" field, and the lowest was in "attitudes and practice".

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that the knowledge of dentists on MID topics is acceptable, and the attitudes and practices need improvements. The studies lacked uniformity in methods and there is still a need for more studies to elucidate the KAP of dentists worldwide.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Understanding the cognizance and the way oral healthcare professionals are treating dental caries is the first step to expanding the minimal intervention evidence into a dental practice. The final goal is to change the practice and make Minimal Intervention Dentistry the standard of care for dental caries worldwide.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42021257518.

Caries risk assessment-related knowledge, attitude, and behaviors among Chinese dentists: a cross-sectional survey

OBJECTIVES

To investigate caries risk assessment (CRA)-related knowledge, attitudes, and practices among dentists in China, to describe their subjective ratings of the significance of specific caries risk factors and to identify factors associated with the level of knowledge, attitudes, and use of CRA in routine clinical practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional anonymous online questionnaire survey was performed. The questionnaire was distributed via WeChat (Tencent, Shenzhen, China) to practicing dentists between November 25 and December 25, 2021. For participant recruitment, we employed purposive and snowball sampling techniques. Data were collected using a specialized web-based survey tool ( www.wjx.cn ) and analyzed with descriptive statistics and regression analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 826 valid questionnaires were collected. Only 292 (35.4%) respondents used CRA in routine practice, among whom a majority (243, 83.2%) did not use a specific CRA tool. The routine use of CRA was associated with the type of practicing office, attendance of caries-related lectures, the habit of reading caries-related literature, geographic location, and the total knowledge score. The mean total knowledge score was 3.13 (score range: 0 to 6). Knowledge levels were related to several sociodemographic characteristics, including geographic location, the type of practicing office, attendance of caries-related lectures and the habit of reading caries-related literature. The risk factor deemed most important was "current oral hygiene."

CONCLUSIONS

Caries risk assessment has not widely entered clinical practice in China. The level of CRA-related knowledge among dentists was generally suboptimal.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Strengthening CRA-related education may allow practitioners to develop a better understanding of caries risk assessment and hence promote its implementation.

Caries Management in Special Care Dentistry

The objective of this article is to provide a summary of the current evidence-based recommendations for caries management in patients with special health care needs (SHCNs). Considerations regarding caries risk assessment and preventive measures are also discussed with the goal of helping clinicians to manage the caries disease process using a person-centered approach and risk-based interventions. Importantly, most of the evidence is still based on the general population, because the evidence for those with SHCNs is still limited.

Decision tree protocol for demineralized gingival margin extension in class II composite cavity preparations

This study proposed the development of a protocol for class-II preparations with demineralized gingival margins for the improvement of the longevity of restorations. Evidence sources such as location/color/surface hardness/width of demineralized gingival margin with enamel/demineralized enamel (DE)/dentin/cementum were reviewed based on methodological studies and systematic reviews. A decision tree protocol was developed with criteria (i) lesion location: demineralized gingival margins in enamel must be removed, but if close to cementoenamel-junction, color should be evaluated. (ii) Color: yellow/brown lesions must be removed, but if white/opaque, then the surface hardness should be evaluated. (iii) Surface hardness: soft/demineralized gingival margin must be removed, but if adequately hard, width should be evaluated. (iv) Width: lesions less than half-enamel thickness and impenetrable by an explorer, remineralization is possible and the lesion does not need to be removed. A decision tree protocol was set up with the current available literature. Further continued investigations will be needed for the appropriate protocol updates.

Dentists’ Decision to Conduct CRA in Adult Patients in Turkey: A Questionnaire-based Survey

Aim:

The concept of minimal intervention in dentistry is one of the most important stages of the preventive dentistry, and caries risk assessment (CRA) is an application that needs to be primarily evaluated in order to perform minimal intervention approaches. This study was aimed to evaluate the awareness of CRA and whether CRA is included in daily practice by dentists in Turkey.

Materials and Methods:

This study used a questionnaire survey. A survey was prepared and sent to the dentists who were registered with the Turkish Dental Association via e-mail. A total of 790 dentists returned and 95 respondents were excluded. All the registered dentists filled and returned their survey. Descriptive and logistic regression analyses were performed (n = 695).

Results:

A total of 86.9 percent dentists who took the survey said that they performed CRA in daily practice. “Lack of time” was specified as the most important factor by the respondents who did not perform CRA in daily practice (61.5%). Current oral hygiene status (96.4%) and the presence of one or more active caries lesions (74.5%) were considered the most important risk factors for not performing CRA. Results of multiple logistic regression analysis showed that clinical experience, number of patients treated per day, and type of practice were mostly associated with whether or not performing CRA ( P = .012, .018, and .035, respectively).

Conclusions:

It can be concluded that most of the dentists are aware of the importance of conducting CRA and, with differences in the factors considered, CRA is required in their daily practice in Turkey. The concept of minimal intervention in dentistry is one of the most important stages of preventive dentistry, and CRA is an application that needs to be primarily evaluated in order to perform minimal intervention approaches.

Evidence-Based Dentistry Caries Risk Assessment and Disease Management

The objective of this article was to provide a summary of evidence-based recommendations for the assessment of caries risk and management of dental caries. The goal is to help clinicians manage the caries disease process using personalized interventions supported by the best available evidence, taking into account the clinician's expertise and the patient's needs and preferences, to maintain health and preserve tooth structure.

Remineralisation - the buzzword for early MI caries management

Minimal intervention (MI) dentistry aims to preserve dental tissues first and restore only when indicated, thus remineralisation of initial (non-cavitated) caries lesions, an integral part of caries management, is an essential treatment strategy in MI. With this understanding, dental practitioners are increasingly embracing the principle of non-operative treatment of initial caries lesions. The purpose of this review was to summarise the most recent literature published in non-operative management of dental caries. Three electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL) were searched, and clinical studies, systematic reviews and meta-analysis were included. This report outlines the strategies and numerous therapeutic materials available to aid in arrestment/remineralisation of initial caries lesions on root and coronal surfaces. However, the level of evidence of effect is variable, as well as the availability in different parts of the world. Options available to practitioners will vary when placing emphasis on the level of evidence supporting them. Strong clinical evidence support the effectiveness of pits/fissure sealants for therapeutic management of active initial caries on occlusal surfaces, and fluoride varnishes for remineralisation of caries lesions on root and coronal smooth surfaces, including proximal surfaces. Other materials formulated to enhance the effectiveness of any chosen remineralisation strategy were discussed. However, it is absolutely necessary that all caries remineralisation treatment be complemented with general behavioural modification in oral health through motivational interviewing directed towards change in oral hygiene to control plaque, dietary attitude modification to reduce the frequency of intake of fermentable sugars, and establishment of risk-based recall visits.

Caries risk/susceptibility assessment: its value in minimum intervention oral healthcare

This narrative review describes the intimate connection between minimum intervention (MI) oral healthcare and caries risk/susceptibility assessment (CRA). Indeed CRA is the corner stone of an MI care plan, allowing the determination of the appropriate interventions (non-invasive as well as invasive [restorative]) and recall consultation strategies. Various CRA protocols/models have been developed to assist the oral healthcare practitioner/team in a logical systematic approach to synthesising information about a disease that has a multifactorial aetiology. Despite the criticisms toward the lack of clear-cut validation of the proposed protocols/models, CRA still has great potential to enhance patient care by allowing the oral healthcare practitioner/team and the patient to understand the specific reasons for their caries activity and to tailor their care plans and recall intervals accordingly.

Knowledge, attitude and skills of dental practitioners of Puducherry on minimally invasive dentistry concepts: A questionnaire survey

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive dentistry (MID) encompasses early caries diagnosis through caries risk assessment (CRA), early detection of incipient carious lesion including primary and secondary prevention based on scientific evidence that remineralization of demineralized enamel and dentin is possible if detected early. Although the dental curriculum focuses on the advantages of MID in tooth preservation, this science is not usually translated into practice.

AIM

This study aimed to evaluate the knowledge, attitude, and skills of dental practitioners of Puducherry regarding the concepts of MID.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Data were collected through an online survey questionnaire based on awareness and practice of MID. Statistical evaluation was done on SPSS by Chi-square test.

RESULTS

A total of 126 dentists responded of which only 55% were trained in MID during their undergraduate and internship period, mainly through lectures (49.6%). Nearly 81% agreed that CRA should be conducted for all patients. Almost 42.7% had heard about International Caries Detection and Assessment System, but only 25.9% used a blunt explorer for caries detection. About 13.7% use magnification (loupes/microscope), but majority (84.7%) use radiographs. More than 70% were unaware of newer methods of caries detection. Statistically significant differences were found (P < 0.05) regarding qualification and experience about the effectiveness of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment and sandwich technique for treatment of caries in permanent teeth and high caries-risk children.

CONCLUSION

Although there is knowledge about advantages of MID among dentists of Puducherry, it does not benefit patients, as many practitioners still follow the traditional principles of total caries removal.

Caries Risk Assessment in School Children Using Reduced Cariogram Model

Objective:

To estimate the percentage of children with low, moderate and high caries risk; and to determine the predictors of caries risk amongst 11-12 year old Pakistani school children.

Methods:

Subjects’ caries risk was assessed using the Cariogram programme. The survey was done among school children in Bhakkar district of Punjab, Pakistan. Caries and plaque level were assessed using the DMFT and Sillnes and Loe indices respectively, while diet content and frequency were assessed using a three-day diet diary.

Results:

A total of 226 children participated in this study, giving a response rate of 75%. Most subjects (39.8%) were in the low risk category with DMFT score of 0. The overall mean DMFT score was 1.49 (±0.63). Linear and multiple regressions were performed to evaluate the predictability of caries risk. Previous experience of dental caries was found to be the most relevant predictor of caries risk (40%).

Conclusion:

The levels of caries risk amongst Pakistani 11-12 year old school children were generally low. Past caries experience was the most significant factor in predicting future caries lesion in this sample population.

Knowledge, opinions and practices of French general practitioners in the assessment of caries risk: results of a national survey

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to describe the knowledge, opinions and practices of French general dental practitioners with respect to caries risk assessment (CRA) through the use of a national questionnaire survey.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A postal questionnaire survey was applied to a simple random sample of dentists (n = 2000) in France. Descriptive and logistic regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The response rate was 34.7 %. Of the respondents, 38.4 % reported that CRA was not part of their routine practice. Among those who claimed to use CRA only 4.5 % did so using a specific evaluation form. Responses showed that there is great variation among respondents with respect to the importance given to different factors to be considered for the development of a treatment plan in adults. Moreover, 32.3 % of respondents reported no regular scheduling of preventive care based on the caries risk of their patients. Nearly 12 % of respondents admitted they did not know exactly what minimal intervention in caries management involved. The results also showed that socio-demographic characteristics of the practitioner influence the use of CRA and other practice patterns.

CONCLUSIONS

CRA has not widely entered clinical practice in France.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study, the first of its nature in France, shows the need to develop the use of CRA in daily dental practice in France.