General dental practitioners' beliefs on the perceived effects of and their preferences for remuneration mechanisms

Varying Manpower Alters Dental Health in a Developing Health Care System

OBJECTIVES

This study assessed relationships between oral health care workforce and dental health in 12-year-olds in a developing health care system in Iran from 1992 to 2014 and compared these findings with the most recent corresponding findings in selected countries.

METHODS

Data regarding oral health care workers from 1962 to 2014 were extracted from the comprehensive human resource data bank of the Shahid Beheshti Research Institute of Dental Sciences. Data regarding decayed, missing, and filled permanent teeth (DMFT) of 12-year-olds, extracted from official statistics, described dental health. Comparisons with other countries utilised the database of the World Health Organization. Changes in the DMFT index with fluctuations in the number of oral health care workers were investigated using exploratory data analysis methods. Associations of DMFT with the density of the oral health care workforce were evaluated using a multiple linear regression model.

RESULTS

The trend in supply of dental workforce in Iran began to expand in the 1970s and, after a reduction in 2003 to 2007, reached a peak by 2014. Means of DMFT indices of 12-year-olds in Iran fluctuated between 1.50 and 2.40 from 1992 to 2014. The relationship between the dentist to population ratio and the DMFT index of 12-year-olds showed a downwards trend (r = -0.994; P < .001) until 1998 and afterwards an upwards trend (r = 0.887; P < .001). Globally, the DMFT index decreased in countries with a preventively-oriented oral health care workforce.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased numbers of dentists have no significant impact on improving dental health in 12-year-olds. To promote dental health, the system providing health services should implement a preventively-oriented approach when planning for the oral health workforce.

Dental care for the elderly through a Capped-fee funding model: Optimising outcomes for primary government dental services

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this study were to (i) compare a Capped Payment formula for adults, to the fee-for-service model and the New South Wales Government services payment model; (ii) identify the presenting oral health needs of a 65+ years of age cohort during the period January 2011 to March 2015.

BACKGROUND DATA DISCUSSING THE PRESENT STATUS OF THE FIELD

Australia faces an ageing population with the vast majority accessing free market dental care, whilst the poor access Government services. This cohort retains most of their dentition increasing demand on Government services.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The analysis of New South Wales Government adult de-identified patients' record unit data was from 2011 to 2015, for the three payment models and undertaken in three stages; (i) development of the Capped Payment Model; (ii) evaluation of twenty (20) case studies of adults 65+ years of age; (iii) analyse the cost efficiency of the three payment models.

RESULTS

This study found that the Government model was the most cost effective. The Capped-fee model performed less efficiently, particularly in the 75+ age group, with the fee-for-service model generally more costly. It was $2580 (85%) more costly for the 65-74 age cohort, and $4619 (66%) for the 75+ age cohort.

CONCLUSION

Policy makers in partnership with Government and private service providers should seek to develop partnerships with Government, private services and universities, scope opportunities in applying a Capped-fee funding model, and one that helps address the oral needs of the elderly.

The effect of different methods of remuneration on the behaviour of primary care dentists

BACKGROUND

Methods of remuneration have been linked with the professional behaviour of primary care physicians. In dentistry, this can be exacerbated as clinicians operate their practices as businesses and take the full financial risk of the provision of services. The main methods for remunerating primary care dentists include fee-for-service, fixed salary and capitation payments. The aim of this review was to determine the impact that these remuneration mechanisms have upon primary care dentists' behaviour.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of different methods of remuneration on the level and mix of activities provided by primary care dentists and the impact this has on patient outcomes.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) Group Specialised Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 7, 2013); MEDLINE (Ovid) (1947 to 11 June 2013); EMBASE (Ovid) (1947 to 11 June 2013); EconLit (1969 to 11 June 2013); the NHS Economic Evaluation Database (EED) (11 June 2013); and the Health Economic Evaluations Database (HEED) (11 June 2013). We conducted cited reference searches for the included studies in ISI Web of Knowledge; searched grey literature sources; handsearched selected journals; and contacted authors of relevant studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Primary care dentists were defined as clinicians that deliver routine or mainstream dental care in a primary care environment. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomised controlled clinical trials (NRCTs), controlled before-after (CBA) studies and interrupted time series (ITS) studies. The methods of remuneration that we considered were: fee-for-service, fixed salary and capitation payments. Primary outcome measures were: measures of clinical activity; volume of clinical activity undertaken; time taken and clinical session length, or both; clinician type utilised; measures of health service utilisation; access and attendance as a proportion of the population; re-attendance rates; recall frequency; levels of oral health inequalities; non-attendance rates; healthcare costs; measures of patient outcomes; disease reduction; health maintenance; and patient satisfaction. We also considered measures of practice profitability/income and any reported unintended effects of the included methods of remuneration.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three of the review authors (PRB, JP, AMG) independently reviewed titles and abstracts and resolved disagreements by discussion. The same three review authors undertook data extraction and assessed the quality of the evidence from all the studies that met the selection criteria, according to Cochrane Collaboration procedures.

MAIN RESULTS

Two cluster-RCTs, with data from 503 dental practices, representing 821 dentists and 4771 patients, met the selection criteria. We judged the risk of bias to be high for both studies and the overall quality of the evidence was low/very low for all outcomes, as assessed using the GRADE approach.One study used a factorial design to investigate the impact of fee-for-service and an educational intervention on the placement of fissure sealants in permanent molar teeth. The authors reported a statistically significant increase in clinical activity in the arm that was incentivised with a fee-for-service payment. However, the study was conducted in the four most deprived areas of Scotland, so the applicability of the findings to other settings may be limited. The study did not report data on measures of health service utilisation or measures of patient outcomes.The second study used a parallel group design undertaken over a three-year period to compare the impact of capitation payments with fee-for-service payments on primary care dentists' clinical activity. The study reported on measures of clinical activity (mean percentage of children receiving active preventive advice, health service utilisation (mean number of visits), patient outcomes (mean number of filled teeth, mean percentage of children having one or more teeth extracted and the mean number of decayed teeth) and healthcare costs (mean expenditure). Teeth were restored at a later stage in the disease process in the capitation system and the clinicians tended to see their patients less frequently and tended to carry out fewer fillings and extractions, but also tended to give more preventive advice.There was insufficient information regarding the cost-effectiveness of the different remuneration methods.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Financial incentives within remuneration systems may produce changes to clinical activity undertaken by primary care dentists. However, the number of included studies is limited and the quality of the evidence from the two included studies was low/very low for all outcomes. Further experimental research in this area is highly recommended given the potential impact of financial incentives on clinical activity, and particular attention should be paid to the impact this has on patient outcomes.

Role of the Chronic Dental Disease Scheme in Enhanced Primary Care: allied health or allied outlier?

This study aims to provide a comparative analysis of the Chronic Dental Disease Scheme (CDSS) and the Allied Health Profession (AHP) program as they related to the greater Enhanced Primary Care Scheme introduced by the Australian Government to manage patients with chronic and complex diseases. A retrospective analysis of data pertaining to Medicare items related to dentistry and the allied health professions were extracted from the Medicare Benefits Schedule database online, and formed the basis of this study. The highest proportion of services was provided in the state of New South Wales. There appears to be synergy in the utilisation of services with jurisdictions either overutilising or underutilising services. Costs to the Enhanced Primary Care Scheme under the CDSS model (fee for service) were up to 40 times more expensive compared with the AHP model (fee per visit). Costs and treatment associated with the CDSS experienced an increase of 13350% during the period 2007–08, coincident with an increase in subsidisation. Reconstructive dentistry accounted for the majority of the increase. Gender disparities in dentistry were less distinct when compared with AHPs and were postulated to be due to males presenting with conditions that were more progressive requiring more invasive treatment. A comparative analysis indicates significant differences in costs, nature of treatment and the manner of remuneration between dentistry and the AHPs. A fee for service schedule as evidenced by the CDSS is dependent on the degree of financial incentive as indicated by patterns in utilisation over time. The amount of treatment considered necessary may be influenced by the level of subsidy with treatment that may not reflect disease management. The AHP model, which is based around a fee for visit schedule, is not without its deficiencies but has not experienced significant rises in cost compared with the CDSS.

Remuneration and organization in general practice: do GPs prefer private practice or salaried positions?

OBJECTIVE

In Norway the default payment option for general practice is a patient list system based on private practice, but other options exist. This study aimed to explore whether general practitioners (GPs) prefer private practice or salaried positions.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional online survey (QuestBack).

SETTING

General practice in Norway.

INTERVENTION

Participants were asked whether their current practice was based on (1) private practice in which the GP holds office space, equipment, and employs the staff, (2) private practice in which the GPs hire office space, equipment, or staff from the municipality, (3) salary with bonus arrangements, or (4) salary without bonus arrangement. Furthermore, they were asked which of these options they would prefer if they could choose.

SUBJECTS

GPs in Norway (n = 3270).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Proportion of GPs who preferred private practice.

RESULTS

Responses were obtained from 1304 GPs (40%). Among these, 75% were currently in private practice, 18% in private practice with some services provided by the municipality, 4% had a fixed salary plus a proportion of service fees, whereas 3% had salary only. Corresponding figures for the preferred option were 52%, 26%, 16%, and 6%, respectively. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, size of municipality, specialty attainment, and number of patients listed were associated with preference for private practice.

CONCLUSION

The majority of Norwegian GPs had and preferred private practice, but a significant minority would prefer a salaried position. The current private practice based system in Norway seems best suited to the preferences of experienced GPs in urban communities.

Dentists' use of caries risk assessment and individualized caries prevention for their adult patients: findings from The Dental Practice-Based Research Network

OBJECTIVES

Few studies have examined dentists' subjective ratings of importance of caries risk factors or tested whether dentists use this information in treatment planning. This study tested several hypotheses related to caries risk assessment (CRA) and individualized caries prevention (ICP).

METHODS

Data were collected as part of a questionnaire entitled 'Assessment of Caries Diagnosis and Caries Treatment', completed by 547 practitioners who belong to The Dental Practice-Based Research Network (DPBRN), a consortium of participating practices and dental organizations.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine percent of DPBRN dentists perform CRA on their patients. Recently graduated dentists, dentists with busier practices, and those who believe a dentist can predict future caries were the most likely to use CRA. The association between CRA and individualized prevention was weaker than expected (r = 0.21). Dentists who perform CRA provide ICP to 57% of their patients, compared with 42% for dentists who do not perform CRA. Based on their responses to radiographic and clinical scenarios in the questionnaire, dentists who use CRA appear to use this information in restorative decisions.

CONCLUSION

A substantial percentage of DPBRN dentists do not perform CRA, and there is not a strong linkage between its use and use of individualized preventive regimens for adult patients. More progress in the implementation of current scientific evidence in this area is warranted.

Public preferences for seeking publicly financed dental care and professional preferences for structuring it

OBJECTIVES

To test the hypotheses that socially marginalised Canadians are more likely to prefer seeking dental care in a public rather than private setting, and that Canadian dentists are more likely to prefer public dental care plans that approximate private insurance processes.

METHODS

Data on public opinion were collected through a weekly national omnibus survey based on random digit dialling and telephone interview technology (n = 1005, >18 years). Data on professional opinion were collected through a national mail-out survey of a random selection of Canadian dentists (n = 2219, response rate = 45.8%). Dental and socio-demographic data were collected for the public, as were professional demographic data for dentists. Descriptive and basic regression analyses were undertaken.

RESULTS

The majority of Canadians surveyed, 66.4%, prefer to seek dental care in a private setting, 19% in a community clinic, and 7.6% in a dental school; those that are younger and of lowest incomes are most likely to prefer seeking dental care in a public setting. Most Canadian dentists, 80.9%, believe that governments should be involved in dental care, yet only 46% believe this role should include direct delivery. A third of dentists have also reduced the amount of publicly insured patients in their practice. Canadian dentists are more likely to prefer those public plans that most closely reflect private insurance mechanisms.

CONCLUSION

There appears to be a policy disconnect between the preferences of those populations where governmental involvement is most warranted, and the current mechanisms for financing and delivering dental care in Canada. By concentrating almost exclusively on third-party-type financing and indirect delivery, public dental care policy may not be adequately responding to those most in need, especially in an environment where dentists are largely dissatisfied with public plans.

Caries management: technical solutions to biological problems or evidence-based care?

Caries-related clinical decision-making remains a centrepiece of clinical dentistry. However, the oral disease patterns are rapidly changing towards the better among major sections of the populations, most notably in the high-income countries. The caries decline is well documented among children and younger adults, and is gradually seen to trickle into middle and old age as well. Although it is tempting for the dental profession to take the credit for this development, the evidence points in a different direction. The major contribution of dentistry seems primarily related to changes in the treatment philosophies towards a less interventionist approach. This review aims to spur a further change in the diagnostic and treatment criteria used in the management of dental caries for the benefit of the oral health status of our patients. We must come to terms with the fact that our traditional core skills, our manual dexterity and technical competence, have less to offer to oral health than we have been accustomed to think. The dental schools and the professional dental organizations must carry the responsibility for promoting the necessary changes in the caries related clinical decision-making strategies to allow practicing dentists to provide appropriate oral health care to our populations.