Prognostic significance of positive peritoneal cytology in endometrial carcinoma confined to the uterus

Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting specific mortality risk: A study of competing risk model based on real endometrial cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to construct a competing risk prediction model for predicting specific mortality risks in endometrial cancer patients from the SEER database based on their demographic characteristics and tumor information.

METHODS

We collected relevant clinical data on patients with histologically confirmed endometrial cancer in the SEER database between 2010 and 2015. Univariate and multivariate competing risk models were used to analyze the risk factors for endometrial cancer-specific death, and a predictive nomogram was constructed. C-index and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) at different time points were used to verify the accuracy of the constructed nomogram.

RESULTS

There were 26 109 eligible endometrial cancer patients in the training cohort and 11 189 in the validation cohort. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that Age, Marriage, Grade, Behav, FIGO, Size, Surgery, SurgOth, Radiation, ParaAortic_Nodes, Peritonea, N positive, DX_liver, and DX_lung were independent prognostic factors for specific mortality in endometrial cancer patients. Based on these factors, a nomogram was constructed. Internal validation showed that the nomogram had a good discriminative ability (C-index = 0.883 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.881-0.884]), and the 1-, 3-, and 5-year AUC values were 0.901, 0.886 and 0.874, respectively. External validation indicated similar results (C-index = 0.883 [95%CI: 0.882-0.883]), and the 1-, 3-, and 5- AUC values were 0.908, 0.885 and 0.870, respectively.

CONCLUSION

We constructed a competing risk model to predict the specific mortality risk among endometrial cancer patients. This model has favorable accuracy and reliability and can provide a reference for the development and update of endometrial cancer prognostic risk assessment tools.

The Impact of Positive Peritoneal Cytology on the Survival Rates of Early-Stage-Disease Endometrial Cancer Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background and Objectives: The impact of positive peritoneal cytology has been a matter of controversy in early-stage endometrial cancer for several years. The latest staging systems do not take into consideration its presence; however, emerging evidence about its potential harmful effect on patient survival outcomes suggests otherwise. In the present systematic review and meta-analysis, we sought to accumulate current evidence. Materials and Methods: Medline, Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials CENTRAL, Google Scholar and Clinicaltrials.gov databases were searched for relevant articles. Effect sizes were calculated in Rstudio using the meta function. A sensitivity analysis was carried out to evaluate the possibility of small-study effects and p-hacking. Trial sequential analysis was used to evaluate the adequacy of the sample size. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Results: Fifteen articles were finally included in the present systematic review that involved 19,255 women with early-stage endometrial cancer. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale indicated that the majority of included studies had a moderate risk of bias in their selection of participants, a moderate risk of bias in terms of the comparability of groups (positive peritoneal cytology vs. negative peritoneal cytology) and a low risk of bias concerning the assessment of the outcome. The results of the meta-analysis indicated that women with early-stage endometrial cancer and positive peritoneal cytology had significantly lower 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) (hazards ratio (HR) 0.26, 95% CI 0.09, 0.71). As a result of the decreased recurrence-free survival, patients with positive peritoneal cytology also exhibited reduced 5-year overall survival outcomes (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.27, 0.92). The overall survival of the included patients was considerably higher among those that did not have positive peritoneal cytology (HR 12.76, 95% CI 2.78, 58.51). Conclusions: Positive peritoneal cytology seems to be a negative prognostic indicator of survival outcomes of patients with endometrial cancer. Considering the absence of data related to the molecular profile of patients, further research is needed to evaluate if this factor should be reinstituted in future staging systems.

A qualitative systematic review of the significance of adjuvant therapy in patients with low-risk endometrial cancer presenting positive peritoneal cytology: a relevant study to the guideline update for endometrial cancer by the Japan society of gynecologic oncology guideline committee

In association with an update of the Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology clinical practice guidelines for endometrial cancer in 2023, a systematic review was conducted about the therapeutic benefit of adjuvant therapy on patients with early-stage endometrial carcinoma, who presented positive peritoneal cytology (PPC) without the risk factors for recurrence. The systematic review only included two eligible retrospective studies. Both studies included patients with risk factors for recurrence. A nationwide study in the United States reported that adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with the reduced risk of death among patients with stages I-II endometrial cancer with PPC by multivariate, propensity score-adjusted analysis. Another single-center study in Japan reported no association between adjuvant chemotherapy and relapse-free survival among patients with stage IA endometrial cancer by univariate analysis. This systematic review identified that evidence was limited with conflicting results. Continuous evaluation is warranted to address this clinical question.

Malignant peritoneal cytologic contamination with robotic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer

BACKGROUND

Malignant peritoneal cytology in endometrial cancer (EC) is not considered an independent adverse prognostic factor for uterine-confined disease and is not a determinant factor in the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system. NCCN Guidelines still recommend obtaining cytologies. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of peritoneal cytologic contamination following robotic hysterectomy for EC.

METHODS

Peritoneal cytology from the pelvis and diaphragm were obtained at the initiation of surgery, and from the pelvis only at the completion of robotic hysterectomy with sentinel lymph node mapping (SLNM). Cytology specimens were evaluated for the presence of malignant cells. Pre- and post-hysterectomy cytology results were compared, and pelvic contamination was defined as conversion from negative to positive cytology following surgery.

RESULTS

244 patients underwent robotic hysterectomy with SLNM for EC. Pelvic contamination was identified in 32 (13.1%) cases. In multivariate analysis, pelvic contamination was associated with >50% myometrial invasion, tumor size >2 cm, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), and lymph node metastasis. There was no association with FIGO stage or histology subtypes.

CONCLUSIONS

Malignant peritoneal contamination occurred during robotic surgery for EC. Large lesions (>2 cm), deep invasion (>50%), LVSI, and lymph node metastasis were each independently associated with peritoneal contamination. Whether or not peritoneal contamination increases risk for disease recurrence should be studied in larger series, including an evaluation of patterns of recurrence and the potential impact of adjuvant therapies. Until the clinical impact of peritoneal contamination during hysterectomy for EC is better understood, methods to reduce peritoneal contamination are warranted.

Significance of positive peritoneal cytology for recurrence and survival in patients with endometrial cancer

AIM

This study aims to examine the association between malignant peritoneal cytology and prognosis in women with endometrial cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the records of patients with endometrial cancer who underwent surgery with intraoperative peritoneal cytology at our hospital between January 1988 and December 2012. All results were reclassified according to the 2009 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) system, and the relation between intraoperative peritoneal cytology results and recurrence and prognosis was examined.

RESULTS

Of the 908 patients analyzed, 205 (22.6%) had positive peritoneal cytology. Patients with positive peritoneal cytology had significantly lower rates of recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) than those in the negative cytology group (both p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis of patients with FIGO stage I/II showed significantly lower RFS in the positive-cytology group (p = 0.005), but there was no significant difference in OS (p = 0.637). In the patients with FIGO stage III/IV or patients classified as "high risk," the RFS and OS were significantly lower in the positive-cytology group (both p < 0.001). Cox regression analysis identified positive peritoneal cytology as a significant predictor of recurrence in patients with FIGO stage I/II disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with positive peritoneal cytology for endometrial cancer have a high risk of recurrence, regardless of histopathologic type or FIGO stage. Peritoneal cytology has already been removed from the 2009 FIGO classification of endometrial cancer, but it may deserve reconsideration.

Suspicious Positive Peritoneal Cytology (Class III) in Endometrial Cancer Does Not Affect Prognosis

Positive peritoneal cytology is a poor prognostic factor in patients with advanced endometrial cancer. Suspicious positive peritoneal cytology (class III) is commonly encountered in clinical practice. However, no standard treatment protocol exists for its management. Here, we investigated a possible relationship between suspicious positive peritoneal cytology, disease stage, risk factors, and endometrial cancer prognosis. We included patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer who underwent total hysterectomy and peritoneal cytology at the University of Tokyo Hospital between 2008 and 2022. Overall, 670 patients were included in the analyses; both demographic and clinical data of the patients were collected. The proportion of patients with lymph node metastasis was significantly different between peritoneal cytology groups, showing lymph node metastasis to be more extensive in patients with positive or suspicious positive peritoneal cytology than in patients with negative peritoneal cytology (p < 0.05). Thirty-nine patients had suspicious positive peritoneal cytology. Omental resection and biopsy were performed in 16 cases. No case of omental metastasis was found. Among patients with suspected ascites cytology, no patient experienced symptom recurrence or death. Therefore, monitoring lymph node metastasis in suspicious positive cases is essential. Moreover, a change of treatment method based on the finding of suspected positive peritoneal cytology is not necessary.

Evaluation of a Patient With Non-Myoinvasive Uterine Serous Carcinoma Confined to a Polyp and Positive Peritoneal Washings With Somatic ARHGAP35 and KRAS Mutations

Currently, the application of peritoneal washings as a diagnostic tool for endometrial cancer staging is not well defined. The case described aims to highlight the current ambiguity surrounding the use of peritoneal washings in clinical practice. 

A 69-year-old G3P3003 presented to her gynecologist with complaints of new-onset heavy vaginal bleeding. The patient sought an endometrial biopsy, which suggested serous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma (EIC) focally suspicious for invasive carcinoma, with the involvement of polyps. Based on these results, a robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, bilateral sentinel lymph node dissection, and omentectomy were performed. Results from her final pathology exhibited a stage IA uterine serous carcinoma (USC) involving a polyp (4.2 cm in greatest dimension) with no myometrial or lymphovascular invasion, but washings were positive for adenocarcinoma. Based on her family history of malignancy, the patient underwent germline panel testing. The patient’s somatic tumor testing demonstrated proficient DNA mismatch repair status, microsatellite stability, low tumor mutational burden (4 mut/Mb), low loss of heterozygosity (9%), amplification of the ERBB2 (HER2/neu) gene by both immunohistochemistry (3+, 20% positive) and fluorescence in-situ hybridization. Her tumor also had weakly positive estrogen receptor expression (1+, 10% positive); furthermore, some pathogenic variants in KRAS (c.37G>T), PIK3CA (c.263G>A), and TP53 (c.743G>A) were identified. Given the incongruent findings found with the positive peritoneal washing and negative lymph node involvement in addition to molecular testing, management for this patient was unclear.

Ultimately, this case highlights a number of advances within the field of gynecological oncology but also emphasizes the persistent ambiguity and incongruency in the management of patients with early-stage high-risk histologies. Moving forward it will become increasingly important to be able to develop a more standardized process to assess how these diagnostic tools should inform prognosis and treatment plans.

Prognosis and adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with positive peritoneal cytology in stage IA endometrial cancer

This study evaluated the influence of positive peritoneal cytology (PPC) on the prognosis of patients with stage IA endometrial cancer, and the usefulness of adjuvant chemotherapy in their treatment. We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with stage IA endometrial cancer admitted in our hospital between 2005 and 2015. Among 989 patients who underwent peritoneal cytology, 135 (13.7%) had PPC. Multivariate analysis extracted several independent risk factors for recurrence in stage IA patients, including those with PPC. Adjuvant chemotherapy did not cause a significant difference in the 5-year relapse-free survival rate in patients with PPC (p = 0.78). Similarly, the 5-year recurrence-free survival rate with or without chemotherapy was not different among type II cancer patients (p = 0.11). However, the baseline risk of 5-year relapse-free survival without chemotherapy in patients with PPC and type II was very low (66.7%). While PPC was an independent risk factor for recurrence in stage IA endometrial cancer, adjuvant chemotherapy did not influence the survival rate in patients with PPC. While it is controversial whether adjuvant chemotherapy should be administered in stage IA uterine cancer with only PPC as a prognostic factor, it should be considered for early-stage patients who have multiple risk factors for recurrence.

The Oncology Safety of Diagnostic Hysteroscopy in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Hysteroscopy is becoming a common method for the diagnosis of uterine disorders in developed countries. However, hysteroscopy might worsen the prognosis of endometrial cancer because it could cause cancer dissemination into the peritoneal cavity through the fallopian tubes. Objective: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to explore the oncological safety of hysteroscopy for early-stage endometrial cancer.

Search Strategy

Eligible studies were obtained from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to September 22, 2020.

Selection Criteria

Studies which compared the oncological safety of hysteroscopy with other methods were included.

Data Collection and Analysis

A total of 3980 patients were included in this study, of whom1357 patients had undergone hysteroscopy and2623 had not.

Main Results

There was no significant association between hysteroscopy and worse prognosis in early-stage endometrial cancer [disease-free survival: log risk ratio(logRR) -0.22; 95% confidence interval (CI), -0.54 to 0.1; p=0.97; overall survival: logRR 0.03; 95% CI, -0.05 to 0.11; p=0.02; disease-specific survival: logRR 0.03; 95% CI, -0.03 to 0.10; p=0.00].

Conclusion

This study suggests that hysteroscopy is a safe diagnostic and treatment method, and has no significant effect on the prognosis of early-stage endometrial cancer.

Systematic Review Registration

PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020193696.

Trends in peritoneal cytology evaluation at hysterectomy for endometrial cancer in the United States

OBJECTIVE

The collection of a peritoneal cytologic sample at the time of surgery for endometrial cancer has traditionally been an important part of surgical staging. In 2009, the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics revised the cancer staging schema for endometrial cancer and removed peritoneal cytology from the staging criteria. The current National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines and the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics organization, however, recommend evaluation of peritoneal cytology at the time of hysterectomy. This study examined population-based trends, characteristics, and outcomes of peritoneal cytologic sampling for endometrial cancer surgery following the 2009 staging revision in the United States.

METHODS

This is a retrospective observational study querying the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program to examine women with stage I-III endometrial cancer who underwent hysterectomy from 2010 to 2017. Trends, characteristics, and survival associated with peritoneal cytologic evaluation at the time of hysterectomy were assessed in multivariable analysis and with propensity score weighting.

RESULTS

Among 62,809 women who underwent hysterectomy, 43,873 (69.9%) had peritoneal cytologic evaluation at surgery and 18,936 (30.1%) did not. Utilization of peritoneal cytologic evaluation decreased from 75.5% to 64.9% during the study period (P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, more recent year of surgery was independently associated with a decreased likelihood of performance of peritoneal cytology (adjusted-odds ratio of peritoneal cytology evaluation in 2017 versus 2010 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52-0.60). Peritoneal cytologic evaluation at the time of hysterectomy was associated with improved all-cause mortality (hazard ratio in the whole cohort 0.94, 95%CI 0.89-0.99; and hazard ratio in endometrioid histology 0.90, 95%CI 0.84-0.97).

CONCLUSION

Performance of peritoneal cytologic sampling has gradually decreased following the 2009 staging revision in the United States. Our study suggests that peritoneal cytology evaluation at hysterectomy may be associated with improved survival in certain tumor groups.

Re-thinking the prognostic significance of positive peritoneal cytology in endometrial cancer

BACKGROUND

Whether abnormal peritoneal cytology (PC) is an independent prognostic factor in endometrial cancer (EC) remains controversial. This study aimed to re-think the prognostic significance of PC in not only all EC patients but also in various subgroups with similar clinicopathological and biological characteristics.

METHODS

EC patients who underwent primary surgery of at least a hysterectomy and were pathologically diagnosed with EC in four hospitals affiliated with the Jikei University School of Medicine were retrospectively reviewed. The prognostic significance of PC was evaluated with univariate and multivariate analyses in the entire cohort and subgroups stratified by surgical stages (early/advanced stages), tumor types (types 1/2), and risk classifications (low/intermediate/high).

RESULTS

Of 1963 EC cases, 1616 met the inclusion criteria. Positive PC was identified as an adverse prognostic factor in analyses of all EC cases and in all subgroup analyses stratified by surgical stages and tumor types. In survival curve comparisons, the progression-free survival (PFS) and disease-specific survival in early-stage patients with positive PC were clearly located between those of stage II patients with negative PC and stage III patients. In the subgroup analyses stratified by risk classification in early-stage EC, positive PC was related to poorer PFS in the intermediate- and high-risk groups but not in the low-risk group.

CONCLUSION

PC status was an independent prognostic factor of EC in all stages and tumor types. Early PC-positive cases, except for the low-risk group, may be recommended for upstaging and should be carefully managed compared with PC-negative cases.

Prognostic significance of peritoneal cytology in low-risk endometrial cancer: comparison of laparoscopic surgery and laparotomy

Background

There is uncertainty surrounding the prognostic value of peritoneal cytology in low-risk endometrial cancer, especially in laparoscopic surgery. The objective of this retrospective study is to determine the prognostic significance of positive peritoneal cytology among patients with low-risk endometrial cancer and to compare it between laparoscopic surgery and conventional laparotomy.

Methods

From August 2008 to December 2019, all cases of pathologically confirmed stage IA grade 1 or 2 endometrial cancer were reviewed at Osaka Medical College. Statistical analyses used the Chi-square test and the Kaplan–Meier log rank.

Results

A total of 478 patients were identified: 438 with negative peritoneal cytology (232 who underwent laparotomy and 206 who undertook laparoscopic surgery) and 40 with positive peritoneal cytology (20 who underwent laparotomy and 20 who received laparoscopic surgery). Survival was significantly worse among patients with positive peritoneal cytology compared to patients with negative peritoneal cytology. However, there was no significant difference among patients with negative or positive peritoneal cytology between laparoscopic surgery and laparotomy.

Conclusion

This retrospective study suggests that, while peritoneal cytology is an independent risk factor in patients with low-risk endometrial cancer, laparoscopic surgery does not influence the survival outcome when compared to laparotomy.

Malignant peritoneal cytology and increased mortality risk in stage I non-endometrioid endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

To examine the survival of women with stage I non-endometrioid endometrial cancer with malignant peritoneal cytology.

METHODS

A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted to examine the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program from 2010 to 2016. Women with stage I serous, clear cell, carcinosarcoma, undifferentiated, and mixed endometrial cancer with known peritoneal cytology results at hysterectomy were examined (N = 4506). Propensity score inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance the measured covariates, and survival outcomes were assessed according to peritoneal cytology results.

RESULTS

Malignant peritoneal cytology was reported in 401 (8.9%) women. In multivariable analysis, older age, serous histology, and large tumors were associated with an increased likelihood of malignant peritoneal cytology (all, P < 0.05). In a propensity score weighted model, malignant peritoneal cytology was associated with a nearly two-fold increase in all-cause mortality risk compared to negative peritoneal cytology (5-year rates, 63.4% versus 80.2%, hazard ratio 2.18, 95% confidence interval 1.78-2.66). In sensitivity analyses, malignant peritoneal cytology was associated with decreased overall survival in old and young age groups, serous, clear cell, carcinosarcoma, and mixed histology groups, stage T1a disease, and staged and unstaged cases, but not for stage T1b disease. Difference in 5-year overall survival rates between the malignant and negative peritoneal cytology groups was particularly large among those with clear cell histology (24.0%), stage T1a disease (19.4%), aged >78 years (18.2%), and serous tumors (17.6%).

CONCLUSION

Malignant peritoneal cytology can be prevalent in stage I non-endometrioid endometrial cancer. Our study suggests that malignant peritoneal cytology is a prognostic factor for decreased survival in stage I non-endometrioid endometrial cancer.

Malignant peritoneal cytology and decreased survival of women with stage I endometrioid endometrial cancer

BACKGROUND

To examine the association between malignant peritoneal cytology and survival in women with early-stage endometrioid endometrial cancer.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program from 2010 to 2016. Women with stage I endometrioid endometrial cancer who had peritoneal cytology testing at hysterectomy were examined (N = 24,800). Characteristics and survival related to malignant peritoneal cytology were assessed. The propensity score inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance the measured covariates.

FINDINGS

Malignant peritoneal cytology was reported in 1081 (4.4%) women. In multivariable analysis, stage IB disease and moderately/poorly differentiated tumours were associated with an increased likelihood of malignant peritoneal cytology (both P < 0.05). In a weighted model, malignant peritoneal cytology was associated with decreased cause-specific survival (5-year rates, 92.1% versus 96.8%, hazard ratio [HR] 1.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.56-2.52) and overall survival (89.4% versus 93.1%, HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.16-1.72). In sensitivity analyses, malignant peritoneal cytology was associated with decreased overall survival in the high-intermediate-risk group (5-year rates, 77.8% versus 83.6%, HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.20-2.06) and decreased cause-specific survival in the low-risk group (95.4% versus 98.0%, HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.01-2.68). In the high-intermediate-risk group with malignant peritoneal cytology, postoperative chemotherapy was associated with improved overall survival compared to whole pelvic radiotherapy (5-year rates, 82.7% versus 64.6%, HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.14-0.96). This association was not observed in negative cytology cases (81.5% versus 79.7%, HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.53-1.14).

INTERPRETATION

Malignant peritoneal cytology may be associated with decreased survival in stage I endometrioid endometrial cancer.

Significance of abnormal peritoneal cytology on survival of women with stage I-II endometrioid endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

To examine survival of women with stage I-II endometrioid endometrial cancer whose peritoneal cytology showed malignant or atypical cells (abnormal peritoneal cytology).

METHODS

This is a multi-center retrospective study examining 1668 women with stage I-II endometrioid endometrial cancer who underwent primary hysterectomy with available peritoneal cytology results between 2000 and 2015. Abnormal peritoneal cytology was correlated to clinico-pathological characteristics and oncological outcome.

RESULTS

Malignant and atypical cells were seen in 125 (7.5%) and 58 (3.5%) cases, respectively. On multivariate analysis, non-obesity, non-diabetes mellitus, cigarette use, and lympho-vascular space invasion were independently associated with abnormal peritoneal cytology (all, P<0.05). Abnormal peritoneal cytology was independently associated with decreased disease-free survival (hazard ratio 3.07, P<0.001) and cause-specific survival (hazard ratio 3.42, P=0.008) on multivariate analysis. Abnormal peritoneal cytology was significantly associated with increased risks of distant-recurrence (5-year rates: 8.8% versus 3.6%, P=0.001) but not local-recurrence (5.2% versus 3.0%, P=0.32) compared to negative cytology. Among women with stage I disease, abnormal peritoneal cytology was significantly associated with an increased risk of distant-recurrence in the low risk group (5-year rates: 5.5% versus 1.0%, P<0.001) but not in the high-intermediate risk group (13.3% versus 10.8% P=0.60). Among 183 women who had abnormal peritoneal cytology, postoperative chemotherapy significantly reduced the rate of peritoneal recurrence (5-year rates: 1.3% versus 9.2%, P=0.039) whereas postoperative radiotherapy did not (7.1% versus 5.5%, P=0.63).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that abnormal peritoneal cytology may be a prognostic factor for decreased survival in women with stage I-II endometrioid endometrial cancer, particularly for low-risk group.

Revaluating the survival effects of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1988 stage IIIA criteria for endometrial cancer

Objective:

This study aimed to define factors that affected survival in the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 1988 stage IIIA endometrial cancer (EC).

Material and Methods:

The study included patients with EC who underwent surgery between 1992 and 2013. Patients with adnexal metastases, uterine serosal involvement or positive peritoneal cytology (stage IIIA disease according to the former 1988 FIGO staging system) were selected for further analysis. Clinical and pathologic factors associated with progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated using univariate and multivariate statistical tests.

Results:

Seventy-seven patients with stage IIIA disease according to the 1988 FIGO staging system were included. The median follow-up was 37 months (range, 1-175 months) and recurrence was detected in 19 patients. Univariate analysis revealed that the presence of uterine serosal invasion and advanced histologic grade (grade 1-2 vs. grade 3) were associated with diminished PFS (p=0.001, p=0.047). The presence of adnexal involvement and positive peritoneal cytology had no statistically significant influence on PFS (p=0.643 and p=0.795, respectively).

Conclusion:

In patients with stage IIIA EC according to the FIGO 1988 staging system, only uterine serosal involvement was related with adverse oncologic outcomes, not adnexal involvement or presence of positive cytology.

Intraperitoneal cytology after laparoscopic hysterectomy in patients with endometrial cancer: A retrospective observational study

The aim of this study was to evaluate the dissemination of cancer cells at laparoscopic hysterectomy according to the intraperitoneal cytology.Patients with endometrial cancer underwent total laparoscopic modified radical hysterectomy. Peritoneal wash cytology was performed on entering the peritoneal cavity before surgical preparation and just after hysterectomy.Seventy-eight patients underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. Among the 15 patients who had positive intraperitoneal cytology on entering the peritoneal cavity, 10 converted to negative intraperitoneal cytology after hysterectomy. In contrast, among the 63 patients who had negative intraperitoneal cytology on entering the peritoneal cavity, 2 converted to positive intraperitoneal cytology after hysterectomy.While surgery can reduce the number of cancer cells in the peritoneal cavity, leakage can occur, as seen in some cases of hysterectomy. Careful washing must be performed after hysterectomy.

Prediction of Site-Specific Tumor Relapses in Patients With Stage I-II Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the association of predictors of an advanced disease and/or poor outcome with the occurrence of tumor relapses in different anatomical sites in patients with stage I-II endometrioid endometrial cancer.

METHODS

A total of 929 patients were included in the study. The median follow-up time was 57 months (range, 1-108 months). The studied variables were: poor tumor differentiation, myometrial invasion 50% or greater, tumor size 3 cm or greater, lymphovascular space invasion, cervical stromal invasion, positive peritoneal cytology, old age (>77 years), obesity (body mass index ≥30 kg/m), and diabetes.

RESULTS

A relapse was diagnosed in 98 patients (10.5%) (vaginal in 15, pelvic in 27, intra-abdominal beyond the pelvis in 27, extra-abdominal in 29). None of the variables were associated with an altered risk of vaginal or pelvic relapses in univariate analyses. Poor differentiation, myometrial invasion 50% or greater, tumor size 3 cm or greater, and positive peritoneal cytology were associated with an increased risk of intra-abdominal relapses beyond the pelvis (odds ratios [ORs] between 2.2 and 9.6). With the exception of obesity and diabetes, all variables were associated with an increased risk of extra-abdominal relapses (ORs between 2.3 and 13). Tumor size 3 cm or greater (OR, 3.1) and positive peritoneal cytology (OR, 16) predicted intra-abdominal relapses beyond the pelvis in multivariate analysis, whereas poor differentiation (OR, 2.9), myometrial invasion 50% or greater (OR, 4.0), and positive peritoneal cytology (OR, 27) predicted extra-abdominal relapses. Compared with vaginal relapses, intra-abdominal relapses beyond the pelvis and extra-abdominal relapses were associated with a worse disease-specific survival. Survival of patients with a pelvic relapse did not differ from that of patients with a vaginal relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk variables of endometrial cancer are differently associated with relapses in different locations. Our findings may promote studies that explore the most efficient adjuvant therapy in high-risk early-stage endometrioid endometrial cancer.

Prognostic significance of peritoneal cytology in low-intermediate risk endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVES

There is uncertainty surrounding the prognostic value and clinical utility of peritoneal cytology in endometrial cancer. Our primary objective was to determine if positive cytology is associated with disease-free and overall survival in women treated surgically for endometrial cancer, specifically those with low or intermediate risk disease.

METHODS

This was a retrospective population-based cohort study of British Columbia Cancer Registry patients who underwent surgery with peritoneal washings for endometrioid-type endometrial cancer from 2003 to 2009. Low risk was defined as Stage IA grade 1 or 2, and intermediate risk defined as Stage IA grade 3, or Stage IB grade 1 or 2 tumours. Five-year overall and disease free-survival were assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimation. Potential covariates including peritoneal cytology, grade, depth of myometrial invasion, LVSI, age, and adjuvant therapy were evaluated in a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

There were 849 patients, of whom 370 (43.6%) and 298 (35.1%) had low- and intermediate-risk disease, respectively. Overall, forty-nine (5.8%) patients had positive cytology, including 6 and 9 with low- and intermediate-risk respectively (2.2% within low and intermediate risk combined). Positive peritoneal cytology was not significantly associated with disease-free (HR 3.17, 95% CI 0.91-11.03) or overall survival (HR 1.33, 95% CI 0.47-3.76) in low and intermediate risk patients. Only age and extensive LVSI were associated with lower overall survival (HR 1.10, 95% CI 1.08-1.13, and HR 2.39, 95% CI 1.02-5.61, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Positive peritoneal cytology was not associated with disease-free and overall survival in women with low and intermediate risk endometrial cancer.

Role of positive peritoneal cytology in FIGO stage IB to IIB cervical adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prognostic relevance of positive peritoneal cytology in patients with cervical adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

The present study included patients diagnosed with FIGO stage IB to IIB cervical adenocarcinoma who underwent surgery at a hospital in Beijing, China, between December 1, 2000, and December 31, 2015. Baseline data were retrieved from patient medical records and follow-up data were collected through telephone interviews. The relationship between positive peritoneal cytology and the patients' clinicopathological features, and their prognosis was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards modeling.

RESULTS

There were 136 patients who met the inclusion criteria and participated in interviews. Peritoneal cytology was positive in 13 (9.6%) patients. The 5-year survival rate of patients with positive and negative cytology was 69.2% and 95.7%, respectively (P<0.001). The 3-year recurrence-free survival rate in the two groups was 76.2% and 91.3%, respectively (P=0.041). Cox regression analysis showed pelvic lymph node involvement and vaginal invasion to be independent adverse risk factors for survival. The recurrence rate in the positive cytology group was significantly higher than that in the negative cytology group (38.5% vs 7.3%; P=0.002).

CONCLUSION

Positive peritoneal cytology in patients with cervical adenocarcinoma was associated with a poor prognosis and a higher recurrence rate, but it was not an independent prognostic factor.

Histologic grade and peritoneal cytology as prognostic factors in type 1 endometrial cancer

BACKGROUND

Prognostic clinicopathological factors for type 1 endometrial cancer are unknown and the purpose of the current study was to determine the independent prognostic variables for type 1 endometrial cancer.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of 168 patients with type 1 endometrial cancer primarily treated with comprehensive staging surgery. The median follow-up time was 68 (12-100) months. Independent risk factors for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined using multivariate Cox regression models. Sub-group analysis of stage I was also performed. We also assessed the patterns of failure among patients with recurrences and investigated the associations with the prognostic variables determined by multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty patients (11.9%) had recurrence and 13 patients (7.7%) died of the disease overall. Multivariate analysis revealed that grade 2 (G2) histology (p = 0.008) and positive peritoneal cytology (p = 0.001) predicted the recurrent event in type 1 endometrial cancer. G2 histology (p = 0.007) and positive peritoneal cytology (p = 0.003) were also found to be independent risk factors for tumor-related deaths. Among stage I patients, G2 histology and positive peritoneal cytology were also independent prognostic variables for DFS and OS. Patients with G2 histology and/or positive peritoneal cytology were more likely to have recurrence at distant sites.

CONCLUSIONS

G2 histology and positive peritoneal cytology were independent prognostic factors for DFS and OS in type 1 endometrial cancer.

The Impact of Combined Radiation and Chemotherapy on Outcome in Uterine Clear Cell Carcinoma Compared with Chemotherapy Alone

AIMS

To investigate the impact of pelvic radiation on survival in patients with uterine clear cell carcinoma (UCC) who received adjuvant chemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with stage I-IV UCC who had undergone surgery and chemotherapy were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) programm 2000-2009. Patients were divided into those who received only chemotherapy and those who received both chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression models were used for analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 317 patients included, 195 (62%) were in the chemotherapy only group and 122 (38%) were in the chemotherapy and radiation therapy group. Pelvic radiation was associated with significant improvement in overall survival (median 88 versus 25 months, 5 year survival: 58% versus 33%, P<0.001) in the chemotherapy and radiation therapy group compared with the chemotherapy only group for the entire cohort. On subset analysis, chemotherapy and radiation therapy was associated with improved overall survival in late stage disease (III-IV) (5 year 54% versus 22%, P<0.001) compared with the chemotherapy only group, whereas in stage I-II UCC, there was no difference in overall survival between the chemotherapy and radiotherapy group and the chemotherapy only group (5 year 65% versus 67%, P=0.69). In multivariable analysis, pelvic radiation was associated with improved survival in patients with late stage disease (hazard ratio 0.57, 95% confidence interval 0.35-0.94, P=0.03) but not for early stage disease (hazard ratio 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.33-2.0, P=0.65). Other significant predictors were advanced stage, positive cytology and extensive lymphadenectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiation was associated with significant improvement in survival in advanced stage UCC, but not in early stage UCC. These data support the beneficial role of radiation therapy in UCC, especially in patients with advanced stage disease.

The impact of combined radiation and chemotherapy on outcome in uterine papillary serous carcinoma compared to chemotherapy alone

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of pelvic radiation on survival in patients with uterine serous carcinoma (USC) who received adjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

Patients with stage I-IV USC were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program 2000 to 2009. Patients were included if treated with surgery and chemotherapy. Patients were divided into two groups: those who received chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy (CT_RT) and those who received chemotherapy only (CT). Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression proportional hazard models were used.

RESULTS

Of the 1,838 included patients, 1,272 (69%) were CT and 566 (31%) were CT_RT. Adjuvant radiation was associated with significant improvement in overall survival (OS; p<0.001) and disease-specific survival (DSS; p<0.001) for entire cohort. These findings were consistent for the impact of radiation on OS (p<0.001) and DSS (p<0.001) in advanced stage (III-IV) disease but not for early stage (I?II) disease (p=0.21 for OS and p=0.82 for DSS). In multivariable analysis adjusting for age, stage, race and extent of lymphadenectomy, adjuvant radiation was a significant predictor of OS and DSS for entire cohort (p=0.003 and p=0.05) and in subset of patients with stage III (p=0.02 and p=0.07) but not for patients with stage I (p=0.59 and p=0.49), II (p=0.83 and p=0.82), and IV USC (p=0.50 and p=0.96). Other predictors were stage, positive cytology, African American race and extent of lymphadenectomy.

CONCLUSION

In USC patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant radiation was associated with significantly improved outcome in stage III disease but not for other stages. Positive cytology, extent of lymphadenectomy and African race were significant predictors of outcome.

Peritoneal cytology in endometrial cancer

AIMS

To investigate whether positive peritoneal cytology (PPC) has an effect on expected survival in endometrial cancer and to present factors that affect PPC occurrence.

METHODS

Patient chart information of 224 patients who had been treated at the Ankara Oncology Education and Research Hospital due to endometrial cancer between 1996 and 2006 were retrospectively reviewed. Factors that were likely to have an effect on peritoneal fluid cytology in all patients, such as age, histologic type, grade, myometrial invasion, cervical invasion, tumor size, and lymphatic metastasis, were analyzed.

RESULTS

We observed peritoneal cytology, grade, myometrial invasion, cervical stromal invasion, tumor size, and lymphatic metastasis to have a significant effect on survival. Cytology was positive in 20 of 224 patients (8.9%). Statistical analysis revealed a significant effect on PPC occurrence of myometrial invasion, cervical stromal invasion, tumor size, histologic type, and lymphatic metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Positive peritoneal cytology has a significant effect on survival in endometrial cancer. Positive peritoneal cytology occurrence is influenced by myometrial invasion, cervical stromal invasion, tumor size, histologic type, and lymphatic metastasis.

Prognostic value of peritoneal washing cytology in gynecologic malignancies: a controversial issue

PURPOSE

To evaluate the prognostic impact of peritoneal washing cytology in patients with endometrial and ovarian cancers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively identified 86 individuals with ovarian carcinomas, ovarian borderline tumors and endometrial adenocarcinomas. The patients had been treated at Shahid Sadoughi Hospital and Ramazanzadeh Radiotherapy Center, Yazd, Iran between 2004 and 2012. Survival differences were determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox regression method. A p<0.05 value was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

There were 36 patients with ovarian carcinomas, 4 with borderline ovarian tumors and 46 with endometrial carcinomas. The mean age of the patients was 53.8±15.2 years. In patients with ovarian carcinoma the overall survival in the negative cytology group was better than the patients with positive cytology although this difference failed to reach statistical significance (p=0.30). At 0 to 50 months the overall survival was better in patients with endometrial adenocarcinoma and negative cytology than the patients with positive cytology but then it decreased (p=0.85). At 15 to 60 months patients with FIGO 2009 stage IA-II endometrial andocarcinoma and negative peritoneal cytology had a superior survival rate compared to 1988 IIIA and positive cytology only, although this difference failed to reach statistical significance(p=0.94). Multivariate analysis using Cox proportional hazards model showed that stage and peritoneal cytology were predictors of death.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show good correlation of peritoneal cytology with prognosis in patients with ovarian carcinoma. In endometrial carcinoma it had prognostic importance. Additional research is warranted.

Factors predicting nodal metastasis in endometrial cancer

PURPOSE

Evaluation of lymph node (LN) metastases in endometrial carcinoma (EC) is an important prognostic factor and a required element of cancer staging. The purpose of this study is to analyze what factors might predict the likelihood of nodal involvement in EC.

METHODS

A retrospective search of our institutional database for hysterectomies with associated LN dissection in women with EC revealed 207 cases between 2005 and 2012. Cases with primary EC, irrespective of histologic subtype, including carcinosarcomas were included in the study, but pure sarcomas were excluded. We evaluated various factors including tumor size (TS; ≤2.0 cm and >2.0 cm), depth of myometrial invasion (DMI; absent, ≤50 %, >50 %), positive pelvic cytology (PPC), cervical stromal invasion (CSI), and lymph-vascular invasion (LVI), to determine which factors correlated with the presence of LN metastasis.

RESULTS

Of the 207 (age = 62.29 ± 10.9, mean ± SD) cases of EC with LN dissection in our study group, 34 (16.42 %) had positive LNs. On univariate analysis, we found that TS (p = 0.04), tumor grade (Grade I and II versus grade III, p < 0.0001), DMI (p < 0.0001), CSI (p < 0.0001), LVI (p < 0.0001), and PPC (p = 0.001) showed statistically significant correlation with LN metastasis. However, on multivariate analysis, only DMI (p = 0.002) and LVI (p = 0.004) independently showed statistically significant correlation with LN metastasis. In addition, 18 (8.7 %) grade I and II (well/moderately differentiated) tumors with TS ≤2.0 cm and <50 % DMI showed no LN metastasis, LVI, CSI, or PPC.

CONCLUSION

We concluded that DMI and LVI were independent factors predictive of LN metastasis.

The role of cytology and other prognostic factors in endometrial cancer

The clinical and prognostic value of positive cytology in women with endometrial cancer remains uncertain. The aim of our retrospective observational study was to determine whether in women with disease confined to the uterus, positive peritoneal cytology adversely affects disease-free (DFS) or overall survival (OS); to assess whether positive or negative cytology affects survival in women irrespective of stage and to assess whether the use of hysteroscopy or Pipelle for diagnosis affected cytology positivity rates. We have shown that median DFS and OS were almost identical for tumours confined to the uterus with and without positive peritoneal cytology. Women with tumours extending to the serosa or adnexa had a non-statistically significant shorter survival in comparison with women with stage I disease and negative cytology. Out of 59 women that had their cancer diagnosis based on a Pipelle biopsy of the endometrium, five had positive peritoneal washings. A total of 150 women had pre-treatment hysteroscopy; seven of these had positive peritoneal washings. There was no significant difference in the rates of positive cytology between these groups (4.6% vs 8.4%). In our cohort of un-staged women, positive peritoneal cytology did not adversely affect prognosis when disease was confined to the uterus.

FIGO 1988 versus 2009 staging for endometrial carcinoma: a comparative study on prediction of survival and stage distribution according to histologic subtype

Objective

The surgical staging system for endometrial carcinoma developed by International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) in 1988 was revised in 2009. Given the importance of continuous validation of the prognostic performance of staging systems, we analyzed the disease specific survival for patients with endometrial carcinoma using FIGO 1988 and 2009 systems. Further, the stage distribution of endometrioid and nonendometrioid carcinomas was studied.

Methods

Eight hundred twenty-one women with endometrial carcinoma were retrospectively staged using FIGO 1988 and 2009 systems.

Results

FIGO 1988 IC was associated with an inferior survival compared with IA-IB. Survival overlapped for 1988 IA and IB, for 1988 IC and IIA, and for 2009 IB and II. FIGO 2009 IA-II patients with negative peritoneal cytology had a superior survival compared with 1988 IIIA patients with positive cytology only. The survival was similar for 1988 IIIA with positive cytology only and for 2009 IIIA. Cox proportional hazards model recognized grade 3 endometrioid and nonendometrioid histology, tumor spread beyond the uterine corpus and cervix, and positive peritoneal cytology as significant predictors of death. Among 2009 IIIC substages, the proportion of IIIC2 tumors was higher for nonendometrioid than for endometrioid carcinomas (p=0.003).

Conclusion

Stage I with deep myometrial invasion and stage II endometrial carcinoma seem to have similar survival outcomes. Although positive peritoneal cytology does not alter the stage according to the FIGO 2009 system, it should be considered a poor prognostic sign. The high proportion of nonendometrioid carcinomas in the stage IIIC2 category may reflect different patterns of retroperitoneal spread among tumors with different histologic subtypes.

The risk of lymph node metastasis with positive peritoneal cytology in endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

To determine the correlation between positive peritoneal cytology (PPC) and lymph node metastasis in patients with endometrial cancer grossly confined to the uterus.

METHODS

Data were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 1988 and 2005. Only patients with endometrial cancer grossly confined to the uterus who had undergone a complete staging procedure (lymph node removal) were included. Statistical analysis used the χ2 test and logistic regression models.

RESULTS

A total of 22,947 patients were identified. Positive peritoneal cytology was present in 3.5% of the patients. The incidence of lymph node metastasis was significantly higher among patients with PPC compared to those with negative peritoneal cytology for all histologic types examined (P < 0.0001): endometrioid adenocarcinoma, 28.7% versus 6.9%; adenocarcinoma not otherwise specified, 35.4% versus 5.8%; clear cell/serous carcinoma, 41.4% versus 19.0%, and carcinosarcoma,; 38.4% versus 14.4%. After adjusting for other contributing factors in the multivariable model, PPC remained an independent predictor of lymph node metastasis (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Our data indicate that patients with positive washings are at significant risk of nodal metastasis and adverse prognosis. Although no longer a part of the current International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging criteria, peritoneal cytology status should continue to inform clinical decision making in endometrial cancer.

Positive peritoneal cytology is an independent risk-factor in early stage endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

In light of the recent changes in the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system, the objective of this study was to determine the prognostic significance of positive peritoneal cytology (PPC) among patients with early stage endometrial cancer.

METHODS

Data were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 1988 and 2005. Only those patients with stage I/II endometrial cancer who had undergone a complete staging procedure (lymph-node removal) were included. Statistical analyses used Chi-square test, Kaplan-Meier log rank, and Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

A total of 14,704 patients were identified: 14,219 with negative peritoneal cytology (NPC) and 485 with positive peritoneal cytology. More patients with PPC compared to those with NPC were diagnosed with high-risk factors such grade III disease (40.2% vs. 23.8%, p<0.0001), and unfavorable histologic types such as clear cell/serous carcinoma (17.5% vs. 7.5%, p=<0.0001) and carcinosarcoma (9.3% vs. 5.6%, p<0.0001). When compared to patients with negative peritoneal cytology, survival was significantly worse among patients with positive peritoneal cytology (p<0.0001): 5-year disease specific survival 95.1% vs. 80.8% in endometrioid adenocarcinoma; 78.0% vs. 50.4% in clear cell/serous cancer; and 64.7% vs. 32.3% in carcinosarcoma. After adjusting for other contributing factors in the multivariable model, PPC remained an independent predictor of poor survival (p<0.0001) in all histologic types examined.

CONCLUSION

PPC is an independent risk factor in patients with early stage endometrial cancer. Although, no longer a part of the current FIGO staging criteria, peritoneal cytology status should still be considered for accurate risk-stratification of these patients.

Controversies in the management of endometrial carcinoma: an update

Endometrial carcinoma is the commonest type of female genital tract malignancy in the developed countries. Endometrial carcinoma is usually confined to the uterus at the time of diagnosis and as such usually carries an excellent prognosis with high curability. Our understanding and management of endometrial cancer have continuously developed. Current controversies focus on screening and early detection, the extent of nodal surgery, and the changing roles of radiation therapy and chemotherapy and will be discussed in this paper.

[Current TNM/FIGO classification for cervical and endometrial cancer as well as malignant mixed müllerian tumors. Facts and background]

Numerous recent studies of endometrial and cervical carcinomas as well as malignant mixed müllerian tumors (MMMT) of the uterus have made a revision of the FIGO/TNM classification necessary, effective as of January 1st, 2010. There will be a new subclassification of carcinoma of the uterine cervix with proximal vaginal infiltration, using the same cut-off for the tumor extension as used for stage FIGOIB/T1b (≤/>4 cm), resulting in stage FIGO IIA1/T2a1 and FIGO IIA2/T2a2. In endometrial carcinoma, the previous FIGO IA/pT1a and FIGO IB/pT1b will be merged to FIGO IA/pT1a. The former category FIGO IC/T1c will be changed into FIGO IB/T1b. The category FIGO IC/pT1c will not longer been used. Additionally, there will be no separate classification for the involvement of the endocervical glands by endometrial carcinoma. This feature will be incorporated in stage FIGO I/T1 disease. The new category FIGO II/T2 will be defined as endocervical stromal involvement. There will be a new category, termed T3c/IIIC, which includes regional lymph node involvement. Stage T3c1/IIIC1 will be defined as pelvic lymph node involvement and stage T3c2/IIIC2 para-aortal lymph node involvement with or without pelvic lymph node disease. In the TNM system, regional lymph node involvement can alternatively be classified as N1. The MMMT will be staged like endometrial carcinoma.

Iatrogenic transtubal spill of endometrial cancer: risk or myth

INTRODUCTION

Although intrauterine procedures are essential for endometrial evaluation in many cases, the significance of the amount of tumor cell dissemination during these procedures, the viability and invasive potential of the endometrial cancer (EC) cells, and their impact on prognosis remain elusive.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An extensive search was performed in the Cochrane Central Trials Registry, the Web of Science, and PubMed for publications about the role of hysteroscopy (H/S), saline infusion sonography (SIS) and laparoscopy (L/S) in dissemination of EC cells and prognostic significance of positive peritoneal washings (PPW), between 1988 and 2010 and English language. All eligible trials were included.

CONCLUSION

PPW rates vary between 0-14% after dilatation and curettage (D&C), 0-83% after H/S, 0-10% after L/S and 12-52% after SIS. The majority of the studies about EC cell dissemination during H/S and SIS suggest that they increase the risk of spill. There is not enough evidence to support the association between tumor spill and pressure, type and volume of distension medium, duration of the procedure, stage, grade and interval between H/S or SIS and laparotomy. Investigation into the rate of spill of EC cells during laparoscopic surgery is in the early stages and not yet definitive. There are too few in vivo and in vitro studies to comment definitively on the viability of the disseminated EC cells. The limited data we do have, however, questions the ability of disseminated EC cells to maintain and grow. Most published studies support the idea that prognosis is not affected by PPW in stage I EC. The changes in FIGO 2009 staging of EC appears to have merit when considering the sum of the data. H/S and SIS probably increase the risk of spill, however this increase does not seem effect prognosis. Although peritoneal washings are still expected to be performed, PPW itself does not necessitate additional treatment.

[Changes in the TNM classification of gynecological tumors]

Based on the results of clinical and histomorphological studies in recent years, a revision of the TNM classification of malignant tumours of the female genital organs became necessary. Vulvar cancer saw the most significant changes. In the T1 category the new system recognises tumour size and its relation to the infiltration of adjacent structures by the tumour. The number of positive regional lymph nodes has also been included in the new staging system. For cervical cancer, there is a new subdivision of the category T2a depending on tumour size with a breakpoint of ≤ 4 cm versus > 4 cm and a subdivision into T2a1 und T2a2. In endometrial cancer, the previous pT1a and pT1b were merged to pT1a. The former category T1c has changed into T1b. The category pT1c is no longer used. For the first time, there is a TNM classification system for uterine sarcomas.

No cookie-cutter oncology: individualized treatment approaches for women with corpus endometrial cancer

Endometrial adenocarcinoma is the most common gynecologic malignancy and, for the majority of patients who present with stage I (approximately 70%) or stage II ( approximately 10%) disease, 5-year overall survival rates approach 85%. However, the complicated mix of medical comorbidities, the broad spectrum of techniques and treatment modalities and controversial clinical trial outcomes makes treating this heterogeneous group of patients unique and challenging. Similar management controversies exist and, when one factors in histologic variability, no flow-chart treatment algorithm can be easily constructed. This article will discuss data from key clinical trials, consider the role of routine lymphadenectomy as a component of surgical staging, discuss the heterogeneity of stage III patients in both presentation and response to treatment, review options for medically inoperable patients and reflect on current and upcoming protocols.