Para-aortic irradiation for stage I testicular seminoma: results of a prospective study in 675 patients. A trial of the German testicular cancer study group (GTCSG)

Cancer Control, Toxicity, and Secondary Malignancy Risks of Proton Radiation Therapy for Stage I-IIB Testicular Seminoma

Purpose

This study's objective was to report cancer control and toxicity outcomes after proton radiation therapy (RT) in testicular seminoma and to compare secondary malignancy (SMN) risks with photon-based treatment alternatives.

Methods and Materials

Consecutive patients with stage I-IIB testicular seminoma treated with proton RT at a single institution were retrospectively analyzed. Kaplan-Meier estimates for disease-free and overall survival were computed. Toxicities were scored using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Photon comparison plans, including 3-dimensional conformal RT (3D-CRT) and intensity modulated RT (IMRT)/volumetric arc therapy (VMAT), were created for each patient. Dosimetric parameters and SMN risk predictions for different in-field organs-at-risk were compared between the techniques. Excess absolute SMN risks were estimated with organ equivalent dose modeling.

Results

Twenty-four patients were included (median age, 38.5 years). The majority of patients had stage II disease (IIA, 12 [50.0%]; IIB, 11 [45.8%]; IA, 1 [4.2%]). Seven (29.2%) and 17 (70.8%) patients had de novo and recurrent disease, respectively (de novo/recurrent: IA, 1/0; IIA, 4/8; IIB, 2/9). Most acute toxicities were mild (grade 1 [G1], 79.2%; G2, 12.5%) with G1 nausea being most common (70.8%). No serious events (G3-5) occurred. With a median follow-up time of 3 years (interquartile range, 2.1-3.6 years), 3-year disease-free and overall survival rates were 90.9% (95% confidence interval, 68.1%-97.6%) and 100% (95% confidence interval, 100%-100%), respectively. There were no documented late toxicities in the follow-up period, including worsening serial creatinine levels suggestive of early nephrotoxicity. Proton RT had significant reductions in mean organ-at-risk doses to the kidneys, stomach, colon, liver, bladder, and body compared with both 3D-CRT and IMRT/VMAT. Proton RT had significantly lower SMN risk predictions compared with 3D-CRT and IMRT/VMAT.

Conclusions

Cancer control and toxicity outcomes using proton RT in stage I-IIB testicular seminoma are consistent with existing photon-based RT literature. However, proton RT may be associated with significantly lower SMN risks.

Current Practice Patterns Surrounding Fertility Concerns in Stage I Seminoma Patients: Survey of United States Radiation Oncologists

PURPOSE

Patients with testicular seminoma may face fertility issues because of their underlying disease as well as treatments they undergo. The current patterns of practice among U.S. radiation oncologists aimed at assessing and preserving fertility in patients with Stage I seminoma are unknown.

METHODS

We surveyed practicing U.S. radiation oncologists via an Institutional Review Board-approved online questionnaire. Respondents' characteristics and perceived patient infertility rates were analyzed for association with treatment recommendations.

RESULTS

We received 353 responses, of whom one quarter (23%) consider themselves experts. A vast majority (84%) recommend observation as a default strategy. Fifty-two percent routinely advise fertility assessment for patients before observation or chemotherapy, and 74% routinely do so before adjuvant radiation therapy (RT). Forty-one percent and 43% believe that 10% and 30% of patients are infertile following orchiectomy, respectively. Thirty-seven percent and 22% believe infertility rates following para-aortic RT to be 30% and 50%, respectively. Eighty percent routinely use clamshell scrotal shielding. Responders with higher perceived infertility rates are more likely to recommend fertility assessment/sperm banking (Fisher's exact p < 0.0001). Responders who routinely advised fertility assessment were more likely to use clamshell shielding (Cochran-Armitage trend test p = 0.0007). Clamshell use was positively correlated with higher perceived infertility rates following para-aortic RT (Spearman's correlation coefficient = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a clear knowledge of fertility issues in men diagnosed with seminoma, there is no universal adoption of fertility assessment among U.S. radiation oncologists.

Recommendations for followup of stage I and II seminoma: The Princess Margaret Cancer Centre approach

Testicular seminoma most commonly affects young men and is associated with favourable prognosis. Various followup schedules and imaging protocols for testicular seminoma have been described without overall consensus. We reviewed the literature together with our experience at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and present an evidence-based followup approach for patients with stage I and II seminoma.

Radiotherapy in testicular germ cell tumours - a literature review

Testicular germ cell tumours (GCT) represent about 1-2% of malignant in men. The essential therapeutic option for early-stage GCT is radical orchiectomy (RO), except in situations that require immediate chemotherapy in patients with a massive dissemination and unequivocally elevated levels of tumour markers. Postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in patients with testicular seminoma in Clinical Stage I (CS I) is one of the treatment options next to active surveillance (AS) and chemotherapy (CHTH). Regardless of the procedure, five-year survival in this group of patients ranges between 97% and 100%. In the article, we present the literature review pertinent to therapeutic options, with a focus on radiotherapy. We have searched MEDLINE (PubMed) for all studies on patients with GCT treated with radiation therapy during the last 20 years, and the current therapeutic recommendations. We used the following keywords: germ cell tumours, testis, seminoma, non-seminoma, radiotherapy, outcome.

Advances in the treatment of testicular cancer

Germ cell tumors (GCT) are relatively uncommon, accounting for only 1% of male malignancies in the United States. It has become an important oncological disease for several reasons. It is the most common malignancy in young men 15-35 years old. GCTs are among a unique numbers of neoplasms where biochemical markers play a critical role. Finally, it is a model of curable cancer. In this review we discuss cancer epidemiology, genetics, and therapeutic principles. Recent advances in the management of stage I GCT and controversies in the management of post chemotherapy residual mass are presented.

[Organ-sparing therapy for testicular cancer]

BACKGROUND

The therapy of malignant testicular neoplasms has always been characterized by a high degree of radicality. Thanks to a number of medical achievements the cure rate of testicular cancer has notably increased through the last decades. In the meanwhile the main focus is on reducing therapy load, scrutinizing radical orchiectomy as the only adequate therapy for the primary tumour.

OBJECTIVES

This article discusses the question, if and under which conditions an organ-sparing approach can be used appropriately in clinical practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A selective literature search was performed in PubMed.

RESULTS

A set of data suggest that endocrine and exocrine function of the testis can be preserved using an organ-sparing approach and many patients could benefit regarding their quality of life, e.g., preserving the ability to father a child at least temporarily and avoiding the need for hormone substitution. Different from kidney tumors, precancerous lesions (testicular intraepithelia neoplasia, TIN) can almost inevitably be found in the surrounding tissue of testicular tumors. This has to be considered when making a decision in favor of an organ-sparing approach, because radiation therapy on the affected testis has to be performed after tumor resection. Despite the absence of prospective data, organ-sparing surgical tumor resection can be recommended in carefully selected patients.

CONCLUSION

After careful selection of patients, particularly young men can profit from an organ-sparing therapy regimen. Therefore, organ preservation should always be considered in the surgical treatment of testicular masses.

Second cancer risk and mortality in men treated with radiotherapy for stage I seminoma

BACKGROUND

Patients with stage I testicular seminoma are typically diagnosed at a young age and treatment is associated with low relapse and mortality rates. The long-term risks of adjuvant radiotherapy in this patient group are therefore particularly relevant.

METHODS

We identified patients and obtained treatment details from 12 cancer centres (11 United Kingdom, 1 Norway) and ascertained second cancers and mortality through national registries. Data from 2629 seminoma patients treated with radiotherapy between 1960 and 1992 were available, contributing 51,151 person-years of follow-up.

RESULTS

Four hundred and sixty-eight second cancers (excluding non-melanoma skin cancers) were identified. The standardised incidence ratio (SIR) was 1.61 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.47-1.76, P<0.0001). The SIR was 1.53 (95% CI: 1.39-1.68, P<0.0001) when the 32 second testicular cancers were also excluded. This increase was largely due to an excess risk to organs in the radiation field; for pelvic-abdominal sites the SIR was 1.62 (95% CI: 1.43-1.83), with no significant elevated risk of cancers in organs elsewhere. There was no overall increase in mortality with a standardised mortality ratio (SMR) of 1.06 (95% CI: 0.98-1.14), despite an increase in the cancer-specific mortality (excluding testicular cancer deaths) SMR of 1.46 (95% CI: 1.30-1.65, P<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The prognosis of stage I seminoma is excellent and it is important to avoid conferring long-term increased risk of iatrogenic disease such as radiation-associated second cancers.

Acute cord compression secondary to spinal relapse of testicular seminomas

This is the first-reported case of an isolated thoracic spine relapse of a stage 1 testicular seminoma more than 1 year after surgery and radiotherapy. We report a 38-year-old gentleman, who underwent radical orchidectomy and adjuvant retroperitoneal irradiation for a pure testicular seminoma, presenting with acute cord compression from an isolated T8 relapse 14 months after the index surgery. Decompressive laminectomy with instrumentation was performed with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The patient gained full neurological recovery and has remained disease-free for 4 years. Testicular seminomas rarely relapse in the spine after treatment with surgery and radiotherapy, and it is usually the lumbar spine that is involved. Spinal relapse also commonly presents with pain rather than acute cord compression. This case report discusses the unique behaviour of testicular seminomas and their presentation in vertebral relapse. We also present a summary of the available literature on isolated thoracic spine relapse of testicular seminomas.

Aetiology, genetics and prevention of secondary neoplasms in adult cancer survivors

Second and higher-order malignancies now comprise about 18% of all incident cancers in the USA, superseding first primary cancers of the breast, lung, and prostate. The occurrence of second malignant neoplasms (SMN) is influenced by a myriad of factors, including the late effects of cancer therapy, shared aetiological factors with the primary cancer (such as tobacco use, excessive alcohol intake, and obesity), genetic predisposition, environmental determinants, host effects, and combinations of factors, including gene-environment interactions. The influence of these factors on SMN in survivors of adult-onset cancer is reviewed here. We also discuss how modifiable behavioural and lifestyle factors may contribute to SMN, and how these factors can be managed. Cancer survivorship provides an opportune time for oncologists and other health-care providers to counsel patients with regard to health promotion, not only to reduce SMN risk, but to minimize co-morbidities. In particular, the importance of smoking cessation, weight control, physical activity, and other factors consonant with adoption of a healthy lifestyle should be consistently emphasized to cancer survivors. Clinicians can also play a critical role by endorsing genetic counselling for selected patients and making referrals to dieticians, exercise trainers, and others to assist with lifestyle change interventions.

Primary testicular lymphoma

Primary testicular non-Hodgkin lymphoma (PTL) comprises around 9% of testicular cancers and 1-2% of all non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Its incidence is increasing and it primarily affects older men, with a median age at presentation of around 67 years. By far the most common histological subtype is diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, accounting for 80-90% of PTLs. Most patients present with a unilateral testicular mass or swelling. Up to 90% of patients have stage I or II disease at diagnosis (60 and 30%, respectively) and bilateral testicular involvement is seen in around 35% of patients. PTL demonstrates a continuous pattern of relapse and propensity for extra-nodal sites such as the central nervous system and contralateral testis. Retrospective data have emphasised the importance of prophylactic radiotherapy in reducing recurrence rates within the contralateral testis. Recent outcome data from the prospective IELSG-10 trial have shown far better progression-free and overall survival than historical outcomes. This supports the use of orchidectomy followed by Rituximab- cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone (R-CHOP), central nervous system prophylaxis and prophylactic radiotherapy to the contralateral testis with or without nodal radiotherapy in patients with limited disease. Central nervous system relapse remains a significant issue and future research should focus on identifying the best strategy to reduce its occurrence. Here we discuss the evidence supporting combination chemotherapy and radiotherapy in PTL.

Management of stage I testicular seminoma

Adjuvant treatment options for stage I seminoma include surveillance, radiation, and hemotherapy. Despite excellent results for both adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy, many concerns have been raised in regards to the potential long-term toxicities of these treatments. To minimize the burden of treatment, there has been a shift away from adjuvant treatments for stage I testicular seminomas toward surveillance protocols for seminoma survivors. This article reviews the evidence for all adjuvant treatment options for stage I testicular seminomas with a particular focus on surveillance.

Pure seminoma: a review and update

Pure seminoma is a rare pathology of the young adult, often discovered in the early stages. Its prognosis is generally excellent and many therapeutic options are available, especially in stage I tumors. High cure rates can be achieved in several ways: standard treatment with radiotherapy is challenged by surveillance and chemotherapy. Toxicity issues and the patients' preferences should be considered when management decisions are made. This paper describes firstly the management of primary seminoma and its nodal involvement and, secondly, the various therapeutic options according to stage.

Update on management of seminoma

Testicular germ cell tumors and, in particular, seminomas are exquisitely radiation and chemotherapy-sensitive and most presentations are highly curable. In recent years the management focus has been on reducing late sequelae of treatment. For Stage I disease surveillance and adjuvant carboplatin, chemotherapy has become an option. The efficacy of combination chemotherapy has been established for advanced metastatic disease. Through a review of the available literature this article outlines the recent changes in the management of seminoma.

[What's new in the treatment of seminomas?]

Pure testicular seminoma is a rare disease with an excellent prognosis. Its management is controversial. In stage I disease, several treatment options are considered. Those are radiation therapy alone, chemotherapy alone or active surveillance, which is becoming increasingly popular. For more advanced stages, treatment is based on chemotherapy with or without radiation therapy. In this article, we review thoroughly the existing literature and recent recommendations the various treatment options, their advantages and disadvantages in different stages of the disease.

[Stage 1 testicular seminoma]

Testicular cancer is rare, representing only 1 % of malignant tumors, but the most common cancer in young men, 15 to 35 years. Adjuvant radiotherapy after orchidectomy in testicular seminoma stage I, reduces risk of relapse. It aims to eradicate micro-metastatic disease in lymph drainage territories. In the case of adjuvant radiotherapy, the relapse-free survival of 96 % with an overall survival of 98 % at 5 years. The irradiation volume is made up of lymph nodes paraaortic which it is possible to add the ipsilateral renal hilum to the testicular lesion. The current recommended dose is 20 Gy in 10 fractions and 2 weeks, usually delivered by two antero-posterior beams. The acute toxicities, mainly represented by nausea and diarrhea are usually quickly resolved to the end of irradiation. Regarding toxicities long-term, preservation of semen should be considered after surgery because of fear of infertility post-treatment. The risk of second cancer associated with exposure to ionizing radiation, albeit small, is especially important to consider these patients to significant life expectancy. Nevertheless, developments in radiotherapy techniques and lower doses and irradiated volumes can probably reduce this risk further.

Management options for stage I seminoma

Stage I seminoma is the most common clinical scenario among patients with testicular cancer. Following orchiectomy, various treatment alternatives (adjuvant radiotherapy, surveillance, chemotherapy) can be offered that yield similar efficacy results and definitive cure is the rule. However, there is no consensus on the optimal management choice and considerable debate has been raised in recent years. The pros and the cons associated with each therapy, as well as their long-term outcomes are discussed in this review. Overall burden of treatment needed, therapy-related morbidity, economic costs, quality of life issues and patient preferences should all be considered. Refinement in the knowledge of predictive factors for relapse and mounting experience with both surveillance and adjuvant chemotherapy have led to consideration of risk-adapted treatment strategies as an alternative to standard radiotherapy. Although this model needs to be improved and validated, active close surveillance for low-risk patients and adjuvant therapy for those uncompliant or at higher risk of relapse seem to be acceptable options for patients with stage I seminoma.

Optimal management of testicular cancer: from self-examination to treatment of advanced disease

Germ-cell cancer is the most common solid tumor in men aged 15 to 35 years and has become the model for curable neoplasm. Over the last 3 decades, the cure rate has increased from 15% to 85%. This improved cure rate has been largely attributed to the introduction of cisplatin-based chemotherapy. In stage I seminoma and nonseminoma, cure rates approach 100% and treatment is governed by patient choice based on the perceived morbidities of each therapy and personal preferences. For seminoma, treatments include surveillance, radiotherapy, and single course carboplatin. For nonseminoma, treatments include surveillance, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND), and adjuvant chemotherapy. Low volume (<3 cm) stage II seminoma is typically managed with radiotherapy while higher volume (>3 cm) stage II and stage III disease treated with chemotherapy. Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging can differentiate active cancer versus necrosis for postchemotherapy residual masses. PET-positive masses are managed with either surgery or second-line chemotherapy. Low volume (<5 cm) stage II nonseminoma with normal serum tumor markers may be managed with either RPLND or chemotherapy. Patients with persistently elevated serum tumor markers and larger volume stage II and stage III disease are managed with systemic chemotherapy. As with seminoma, good risk patients are typically treated with 3 courses of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) and intermediate and poor risk patients are treated with 4 courses. Residual postchemotherapy masses should be resected due to the uncertainty of the histology with 50% to 60% harboring residual teratoma or active cancer. The majority of patients completing initial therapy who relapse do so within 2 years. A minority of patients (2%-3%) recur after 2 years and this phenomenon is termed late relapse. Excluding chemonaïve patients, late relapse disease is typically managed surgically with 50% being cured of disease. Current therapeutic challenges in testis cancer include the accurate prediction of postchemotherapy histology to avoid surgery in patients harboring fibrosis only, improved therapy in platinum-resistant and platinum-refractory disease, and the understanding of the biology of late relapse.

[Normal tissue tolerance to external beam radiation therapy: the stomach]

In the following article, we will discuss general issues relating to acute and late gastric's radiation toxicities. The tolerance of the stomach to complete or partial organ irradiation is more unappreciated than for most other organs. We consulted the Medline database via PubMed and used the key words gastric--radiotherapy--toxicity. Currently, 60 Gy or less is prescribed in gastric radiation therapy. Acute clinical toxicity symptoms are predominantly nausea and vomiting. Although there is a general agreement that the whole stomach tolerance is for doses of 40 to 45 Gy without unacceptable complication, it is well established that a stomach dose of 35 Gy increases the risk of ulcer complications.

Management of stage I seminomatous testicular cancer: a systematic review

The treatment options available for the management of stage I seminoma consist of either a surveillance strategy or adjuvant therapy after orchidectomy. A systematic review was undertaken to identify the optimal management strategy. The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases, in addition to the American Society of Clinical Oncology Meeting Proceedings, were searched for the period 1981 to May 2007. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they discussed at least one of survival, recurrence, second malignancy, cardiac toxicity, or quality of life for patients with stage I seminoma. A search update was carried out in June 2009. Fifty-four reports satisfied the eligibility criteria, including seven clinical practice guidelines, one systematic review, three randomised controlled trials focused on treatment options, 26 non-randomised studies of treatment options, and 15 non-randomised long-term toxicity studies. The existing data suggest that virtually all patients with stage I testicular seminoma are cured regardless of the post-orchidectomy management. The 5-year survival reported in all the studies identified in this systematic review was over 95%, regardless of the management strategy, including surveillance alone with no adjuvant therapy. In conclusion, to date, the optimal management of stage I seminoma remains to be defined. Surveillance seems to be the preferable option, as this strategy minimises the toxicity that might be associated with adjuvant treatment, while preserving high long-term cure rates. The currently available evidence should be presented to patients in order to select the most appropriate option for the individual.

Posttreatment surveillance after paraaortic radiotherapy for stage I seminoma: a systematic analysis

CONTEXT

The extent and duration of routine follow-up after paraaortic (PA) radiotherapy for stage I seminoma remain controversial in terms of efficacy, costs of technical investigations and long-term morbidity.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the current literature assessing routine follow-up after PA radiotherapy for stage I seminoma.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We identified all published reports on PA radiotherapy for stage I seminoma (1986-2005). We analyzed time patterns of recurrence, sites and methods of detection of relapse, and follow-up programs used.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

We identified 11 publications reporting outcome in 2,280 patients. Median time to recurrence in 80 relapsing patients was 15.5 months. Less than 10% of recurrences were diagnosed beyond the third year of follow-up. Isolated locoregional or distant recurrence was observed in 52 and 20 patients, respectively, without significant difference in median time to relapse. 19 out of 43 recurrences with reported method of detection of relapse were diagnosed by routine technical investigations. There was no significant difference in time to relapse between those patients followed with low volume as compared to high-volume imaging protocols.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that technical investigations in posttreatment surveillance should be restricted to the first 3 years of follow-up. Furthermore, surveillance programs with a high volume of imaging apparently do not lead to earlier detection or less advanced stage at the time of relapse as compared to protocols with low volume imaging.

What is the value of routine follow-up in stage I seminoma after paraaortic radiotherapy?: an analysis of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group (GTCSG) in 675 prospectively followed patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Routine posttreatment surveillance is recommended after adjuvant radiotherapy for stage I seminoma. However, systematic studies on the value of follow-up in these patients are missing. This report addresses the efficiency of routine follow-up in stage I seminoma with particular reference to the mode of detection of relapse and the costs of posttreatment screening.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All follow-up investigations of a prospectively followed cohort of 675 patients with stage I seminoma treated with PA radiotherapy were analyzed with respect to the first indications of relapse, patterns of recurrence, risk factors of relapse, and cost-efficiency of the different technical examinations of the follow-up schedule over a 10-year period.

RESULTS

With a median time to follow-up of 61 months, recurrence was diagnosed by symptoms or physical examination in 14 out of 26 relapsing patients. Among the technical follow-up investigations abdominopelvic imaging had the highest detection rate for relapse, while thoracic imaging and marker analysis were inefficient. Abdominal sonography had the highest cost-efficiency of all technical follow-up investigations, while computed tomography (CT) scans were responsible for approximately 60% of all costs. The authors failed to identify risk factors predictive of relapse after adjuvant irradiation.

CONCLUSION

Routine technical investigations during follow-up after PA radiotherapy for stage I seminoma yield only a low detection rate of relapse from cancer. The data presented here provide no evidence for the value of technical follow-up beyond the 3rd year after treatment or routine screening of the chest. Thorough physical examination of the patients should be encouraged. Patients should be informed about potential symptoms indicative of recurrence. Restrictive use of abdominopelvic CT scans will reduce exposure to ionizing radiation and considerably increase the cost-efficiency of follow-up.

Stage I testicular seminoma: management and controversies

Seminomas constitute more than half of testicular germ-cell tumours and 70-80% of patients with seminoma present with clinical stage I disease. Post-orchiectomy, management options include irradiation, surveillance or chemotherapy. Adjuvant irradiation to the infradiaphragmatic lymph nodes is the standard of care with relapse rates of 3-4%. Long-term follow-up data have shown association with late complications (cardiotoxicity, second malignancy, fertility impairment). Surveillance is an attractive alternative but relapse rates are higher ranging between 15 and 20%. Single agent carboplatin chemotherapy has demonstrated survival data equivalent to radiotherapy but long-term relapse and toxicity data are yet to be confirmed. Routine follow-up after irradiation and the role of risk stratification also remain unclear. Highly curative rates can be attained by all three modalities. Standard treatment with radiotherapy is challenged by surveillance and chemotherapy. Toxicity issues and patients' preferences are considered when management decisions are made.

[Stage I seminoma and radiotherapy: to bury it or not?]

Postorchidectomy management of stage I testis seminoma has evolved for many years. Three treatment options should be discussed after surgery. Surveillance tends toward taking a more significant place to avoid overtreatment, adjuvant chemotherapy with carboplatin has demonstrated its efficiency, and for some, preventive radiotherapy, the historical reference treatment, is losing momentum. Whatever the chosen orientation, long-term prognosis is excellent with overall survival closed to 100%. In this context, this review underlines the advantages and the drawbacks of the three attitudes but also the unknowns relative to each. Indeed, their knowledge is crucial for informing clearly and with an objective way. Without gold-standard, but with three therapeutic options available, informing our patients is the key so they make an informed choice in dialogue with the oncologist.

Scrotal pain as the first clinical manifestation of testicular seminoma: A case report

Seminomas are the malignant testicular tumors most commonly diagnosed in young adult males. It consists of undifferentiated cells derived from the embryonic gonad. The tumor presents as a scrotal mass that may or may not be associated with pain. On ultrasonography, the mass appears hypoechoic with well-defined margins and an echo structure that tends to be homogeneous. Color Doppler studies reveal rich vascularization. This report describes a case of seminoma that presented with scrotal pain. The typical findings on ultrasonography and color Doppler were fundamental for correct diagnosis of this tumor.

Prä- und paraklinische Verbundstudien beim Hodentumor

Testicular malignancy is a rare disease. On average, no more than three patients per year are seen in the majority of urological departments in Germany. Thus, progress regarding management and biological understanding of testicular cancer can only result from cooperative trials. The "German Testicular Cancer Study Group" initiates and supports multicentric studies on testicular cancer focusing on both treatment modalities and basic ("paraclinical") issues. The body size study evaluates the hypothesis that testicular cancer is associated with adult stature. An exploratory study looks at the putative association of testicular cancer and Down syndrome (trisomy 21). Another study documents events of myocardial infarction during chemotherapy for testicular cancer. Finally, late relapses after a disease-free interval of more than two years are evaluated regarding risk factors and prognosis. All of the projects listed here are simple recording studies, i.e. no extended documentation work is required and no clinical intervention is intended. In Germany, chemotherapy for testicular cancer is usually applied by urologists, which is in marked contrast to international custom. Accordingly, urologists are not only facing the responsibility to care for their testis cancer patients but they must also adopt the task of advancing knowledge and clinical expertise with respect to this disease. Opportunities for simple but fruitful contributions to clinical research are offered to even nonacademic institutions by the projects highlighted here.

Management of Low-Stage Testicular Seminoma

Testicular seminoma represents a modern model of a multidisciplinary approach to a curable neoplasm. Surgeons, radiation oncologists, and medical oncologists play an important role in disease detection, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. This article focuses on the management of men who have early-stage seminoma, which represents stage I and IIa (minimal retroperitoneal spread). In stage I disease, the major controversies continue to revolve around surveillance versus adjuvant treatment and more recently adjuvant radiotherapy or carboplatin-based chemotherapy. Focus on long-term complications, such as cardiovascular disease, gastrointestinal disease, and secondary cancers, has led to the concept of increased surveillance with therapy for those who relapse. Radiation therapy remains the mainstay of therapy for patients who have stage IIa disease.

Stage I seminoma in a 15-year-old boy

Seminomas are very rare tumours in children and adolescents. We describe a case of seminoma in a 15-year-old boy who was managed with orchidectomy but no adjuvant therapy. He remains relapse-free 8 years after surgery as determined by clinical, radiological and serological surveillance. This study emphasizes the uncertainty over the need for adjuvant treatment in the management of seminoma in the adolescent patient, in particular in prepubescent children.

Evidence-based guidelines for following stage 1 seminoma

BACKGROUND

The authors developed evidence-based guidelines for a follow-up schedule after orchiectomy for stage 1 seminoma. Required investigations, frequency of assessment, overall duration of follow-up, and management strategies were identified.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed of prospective studies in stage 1 seminoma. Studies published after 1980 were considered eligible for inclusion. Data extracted included relapse-free rates, number of patients at risk, and relapse locations. Five strategies were identified: Surveillance, Extended-Field Radiotherapy, Para-aortic Radiotherapy, and either 1 or 2 cycles of Carboplatin Chemotherapy. For each strategy, Kaplan-Meier relapse-free estimates were used to calculate weighted-mean cumulative hazards of relapse over time. These were used to calculate semiannual weighted-mean relapse hazards.

RESULTS

Seventeen prospective studies with a total of 5561 patients were identified. Actuarial data on relapse was available in 5013 (90.1%) patients, and 92.9% of all relapses had location data reported. Annual hazard rates for relapse were determined.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence-based recommendations for follow-up frequency based on risk of relapse were formulated. The authors suggested 3 times per year when the risk is >5%, 2 times per year when the risk is 1% to 5%, and annually until the risk is <0.3%. Investigations should reflect location(s) at risk of relapse and include computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis for surveillance and adjuvant carboplatin, whereas for para-aortic radiotherapy, pelvic computed tomography alone is required. These recommendations offer the possibility of maximal patient convenience and optimal healthcare resource allocation without compromising disease control.

Management of Stage I Testis Cancer

OBJECTIVE

Over the last 5 years the management of stage I testis cancer has changed tremendously. This review focuses on the latest changes in diagnostics and treatment of clinical stage I non-seminomatous and seminomatous germ cell tumors.

METHODS

A non-structured literature search (MEDLINE) was performed, including recently published papers (up to March 2006) on the subject.

RESULTS

Organ-sparing surgery has become an accepted approach to treat malignant and nonmalignant tumours in a solitary testis. With certain precautions and adjuvant radiotherapy, this approach has proven to be as effective as orchidectomy. Prognostic factors strongly influence the decision for or against adjuvant treatment in seminoma and non-seminoma. With the help of a risk-adapted approach, about 50% of patients with clinical stage I testis cancer will favour close surveillance instead of immediate adjuvant treatment. Several well-conducted trials have helped to substantiate the management. Surgical staging by retroperitoneal lymph node dissection became an exception. Patients with non-seminoma with high risk for occult metastatic disease will favour adjuvant chemotherapy and in patients with seminoma radiotherapy with reduced dosage will be challenged by carboplatin monotherapy.

CONCLUSION

With adequate diagnostics and treatment, 100% of patients with stage I testis cancer will survive. Future research will focus on quality control, adherence to guideline recommendations, and further reduction of treatment to diminish the risk of late sequalae for patients with adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy.

Treatment Options, Prognostic Factors and Selection of Treatment in Stage I Seminoma

Treatment options in patients with stage I seminoma include radiotherapy (RT), surveillance, and adjuvant chemotherapy. This patient population has virtually a 100% cure rate whichever approach is taken. While adjuvant retroperitoneal RT has been the standard of care for the past 50-60 years, there is increasingly persuasive data that adjuvant RT in this setting is associated with a small but definite increased risk of second malignancy and cardiovascular death. The long-term data from surveillance series have documented the safety of this approach, and it is now accepted that a policy of surveillance is the optimal management approach. This gives a relapse rate of 15%, and most patients can be successfully salvaged with RT. Second relapse after salvage RT occurs in a small proportion of cases, and these patients are cured with chemotherapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy using carboplatin has been investigated as an alternative strategy but has not lived up to its initial promise. If used, then 2 courses of treatment should probably be given. It must be remembered that 80-85% of patients with testicular seminoma require no treatment after orchiectomy, and the long-term side effects of any adjuvant treatment approach must be carefully considered.

Late Relapses of Germ Cell Malignancies: Incidence, Management, and Prognosis

Late relapses of malignant germ cell tumors (MGCTs) are rare and occur, by definition, 2 years or later after successful treatment. They represent a major challenge of today's treatment of MGCTs. Because of the rarity and heterogeneity of late relapses, many aspects of their main characteristics remain obscure. We present relevant literature on relapsing MGCTs to highlight the following issues: incidence, impact of initial treatment on the subsequent risk of late relapse, treatment, and survival. In a pooled analysis, the incidence is 1.4% and 3.2% in seminoma and nonseminoma patients, respectively. The predominant site of relapse is the retroperitoneal space in both histologic types. The initial treatment appears to be important for the risk and localization of late relapses. The treatment of late relapses should be based on a representative presalvage biopsy and includes radical surgery and salvage chemotherapy in most cases. Five-year cancer-specific survival is above 50% in the recent large series and reaches 100% in case of single-site teratoma. Diagnosis and treatment of late-relapsing MGCT patients is challenging and should be performed in experienced centers only. Referral of late-relapsing patients to high-volume institutions ensures the best chances of cure and enables increasing understanding of tumor biology and the clinical course of these patients.

Low-dose radiotherapy for Stage I seminoma—long-term results

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to review retrospectively the results of low-dose radiotherapy for Stage I seminoma using four different fractionation schedules and target volume definitions.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 191 patients underwent irradiation for histologically proven Stage I seminoma after undergoing an inguinal orchiectomy. Fractionation schedules were used one after another as follows: Total dose 30 Gy (dose/fraction 1.5 Gy, 16 patients), total dose 25.5 Gy (dose/fraction 1.5 Gy, 62 patients), total dose 20 Gy (dose/fraction 2 Gy, 69 patients), total dose 26 Gy (dose/fraction 2 Gy, 29 patients). The remaining 12 patients were excluded from this study. In the same period the target volume was gradually reduced. In 1983 the paraaortic, pelvic and inguinal regions were irradiated; later the target volume was reduced to the paraaortic region exclusively.

RESULTS

Overall survival and event-free survival were identical in all groups ranging from 95% to 100% /5 years. Three patients experienced a lymph node metastasis during follow-up, 3 patients a distant metastasis to the lung and the bones. Mild acute side effects were noted in 8% to 15% of the patients, and very mild long-term side effects in 1% to 5% of patients. Multivariate analysis showed no prognostic significance of total dose, dose per fraction, or target volume. In univariate analysis, a higher frequency of acute side effects to the skin and the bowel was related to a higher total dose, and an elevated frequency of nausea was related to a higher daily dose per fraction.

CONCLUSION

Using lower doses and limiting the target volume to the paraaortic region exclusively did not result in a worse prognosis in our patient series.

Towards individualised radiotherapy for Stage I seminoma

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Adjuvant radiotherapy is currently standard treatment of Stage I seminoma (SOS). The use of computerised tomogram (CT) planning is compared with traditional planning for greater treatment individualisation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Two plans were generated for each of 10 patients: one using traditional rectangular para-aortic fields, and one using conformal fields. The primary target volume compared was the dosimetric coverage of the inferior vena cava and aorta.

RESULTS

The dosimetric analysis of traditional plans showed that they provided reasonable dosimetric coverage of the CTV. However, if 1cm is used for uncertainty based on nodal coverage then the periphery of the PTV could be significantly under-dosed. The CT based plan delivered improved dosimetry to the vessel PTV compared with the traditional field (CT D 95=24.7 Gy, traditional D 95=23.6 Gy, P=0.002). CT-based plans were significantly wider than traditional plans (CT=11.8 cm, traditional=9 cm, P=0.002). The CT plan tended to irradiate relatively small volumes of the kidneys to higher doses.

CONCLUSIONS

Traditional para-aortic fields may deliver suboptimal dosimetry to an anatomically defined PTV. Our CT-based fields tend to be wider than traditional fields, and provide improved dosimetry to vessels based target volumes. Given that traditional fields are often delivering significantly less than the prescribed dose to the target volume, and that marginal relapses cause a high proportion of treatment failure, there is a suggestion that CT-based plans may avoid under-dosage and geographical miss sometimes seen with traditional plans.

Germ cell tumors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review provides an overview of some of the recent pre-clinical and clinical developments in germ cell tumors.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent epidemiological studies highlight the variations in the geographic and ethnic distribution of germ cell tumors and the changing incidence of seminoma versus nonseminoma in the population. Additional studies are continuing to identify risk factors for germ cell tumors. Expression profiling, both at the gene and protein levels, is beginning to identify, at the molecular level, some of the factors associated not only with germ cell pluripotency but also with the different histologic subtypes of germ cell tumors. Work in the area of identifying potentially new serum tumor markers in germ cell tumor, as well as the role of the traditional tumor markers in predicting outcome to therapy is ongoing. Data is emerging on the role of positron emission tomography in evaluating residual lesions in seminoma. Evolving data on chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery further complements and clarifies information on these treatment modalities, and their potential toxicities, in the management of germ cell tumors.

SUMMARY

Ongoing preclinical and epidemiological studies highlight the complexities underlying germ cell tumor pathogenesis. With enhanced understanding of some of these processes, treatments, particularly for advanced stages, will continue to evolve.

EbM-basierte Indikationen zur Radiotherapie von testikul�ren Keimzellmalignomen

The intensity of adjuvant radiotherapy for stage I seminoma could be reduced substantially in recent years, achieving cure with low side effects and a low probability of late complications. Today a dose of 20 Gy is applied to the para-aortic lymphatics. Valuable treatment alternatives to radiotherapy have emerged: surveillance strategy allows 80% of patients to avoid further treatment. However, the remaining 20% will be exposed to potentially more intensive salvage therapy. Adjuvant carboplatinum chemotherapy offers similar disease-free survival to adjuvant radiotherapy. Long-term experience with late toxicity is not available. In seminoma CS IIA/B curative irradiation remains the standard treatment. Brain metastases of testicular germ cell tumors are treated with a combination of chemotherapy and cranial irradiation. In intratubular germ cell neoplasia (TIN), radiotherapy with 20 Gy will safely eliminate all TIN loci, but will destroy potential residual fertility.