1
|
Bütof R, Hönscheid P, Aktar R, Sperling C, Tillner F, Rassamegevanon T, Dietrich A, Meinhardt M, Aust D, Krause M, Troost EGC. Orthotopic Glioblastoma Models for Evaluation of the Clinical Target Volume Concept. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14194559. [PMID: 36230481 PMCID: PMC9559695 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14194559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Revised: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The accurate and precise definition of the target volume is of enormous importance for the treatment success of radiotherapy. In glioblastoma, the microscopic tumor extension is unclear, which limits the specificity of irradiation leading to either increased risk of local failure or enhanced toxicity rates. In this study, we investigated the microscopic tumor extensions of two different untreated and irradiated orthotopic brain tumor models and correlated this with histologically stained cancer stem cell markers as well as invasion markers and analyses using Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization (MALDI). We found specific MALDI peaks as potential markers for normal brain tissue but also others for demarcation of tumor areas. Furthermore, MMP14 staining revealed mainly positive cells in the tumor border, which could reflect the invasive front in both models. Altogether, the results of this study indicate that an individualized target volume definition for radiotherapy based on biological tumor characteristics in glioblastoma models seems possible. Abstract In times of high-precision radiotherapy, the accurate and precise definition of the primary tumor localization and its microscopic spread is of enormous importance. In glioblastoma, the microscopic tumor extension is uncertain and, therefore, population-based margins for Clinical Target Volume (CTV) definition are clinically used, which could either be too small—leading to increased risk of loco-regional recurrences—or too large, thus, enhancing the probability of normal tissue toxicity. Therefore, the aim of this project is to investigate an individualized definition of the CTV in preclinical glioblastoma models based on specific biological tumor characteristics. The microscopic tumor extensions of two different orthotopic brain tumor models (U87MG_mCherry; G7_mCherry) were evaluated before and during fractionated radiotherapy and correlated with corresponding histological data. Representative tumor slices were analyzed using Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization (MALDI) and stained for putative stem-like cell markers as well as invasion markers. The edges of the tumor are clearly shown by the MALDI segmentation via unsupervised clustering of mass spectra and are consistent with the histologically defined border in H&E staining in both models. MALDI component analysis identified specific peaks as potential markers for normal brain tissue (e.g., 1339 m/z), whereas other peaks demarcated the tumors very well (e.g., 1562 m/z for U87MG_mCherry) irrespective of treatment. MMP14 staining revealed only a few positive cells, mainly in the tumor border, which could reflect the invasive front in both models. The results of this study indicate that MALDI information correlates with microscopic tumor spread in glioblastoma models. Therefore, an individualized CTV definition based on biological tumor characteristics seems possible, whereby the visualization of tumor volume and protein heterogeneity can be potentially used to define radiotherapy-sensitive and resistant areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Bütof
- OncoRay—National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden—Rossendorf, 01307 Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden—Rossendorf (HZDR), 01307 Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden—Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology—OncoRay, 01307 Dresden, Germany
- Correspondence:
| | - Pia Hönscheid
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden—Rossendorf (HZDR), 01307 Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus (UKD), Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Rozina Aktar
- OncoRay—National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden—Rossendorf, 01307 Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Sperling
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden—Rossendorf (HZDR), 01307 Dresden, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus (UKD), Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Falk Tillner
- OncoRay—National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden—Rossendorf, 01307 Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden—Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology—OncoRay, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Treewut Rassamegevanon
- OncoRay—National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden—Rossendorf, 01307 Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Antje Dietrich
- OncoRay—National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden—Rossendorf, 01307 Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias Meinhardt
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus (UKD), Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Daniela Aust
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden—Rossendorf (HZDR), 01307 Dresden, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus (UKD), Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Mechthild Krause
- OncoRay—National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden—Rossendorf, 01307 Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden—Rossendorf (HZDR), 01307 Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden—Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology—OncoRay, 01307 Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Esther G. C. Troost
- OncoRay—National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden—Rossendorf, 01307 Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden—Rossendorf (HZDR), 01307 Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden—Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology—OncoRay, 01307 Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kalinina J, Peng J, Ritchie JC, Van Meir EG. Proteomics of gliomas: initial biomarker discovery and evolution of technology. Neuro Oncol 2011; 13:926-42. [PMID: 21852429 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nor078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Gliomas are a group of aggressive brain tumors that diffusely infiltrate adjacent brain tissues, rendering them largely incurable, even with multiple treatment modalities and agents. Mostly asymptomatic at early stages, they present in several subtypes with astrocytic or oligodendrocytic features and invariably progress to malignant forms. Gliomas are difficult to classify precisely because of interobserver variability during histopathologic grading. Identifying biological signatures of each glioma subtype through protein biomarker profiling of tumor or tumor-proximal fluids is therefore of high priority. Such profiling not only may provide clues regarding tumor classification but may identify clinical biomarkers and pathologic targets for the development of personalized treatments. In the past decade, differential proteomic profiling techniques have utilized tumor, cerebrospinal fluid, and plasma from glioma patients to identify the first candidate diagnostic, prognostic, predictive, and therapeutic response markers, highlighting the potential for glioma biomarker discovery. The number of markers identified, however, has been limited, their reproducibility between studies is unclear, and none have been validated for clinical use. Recent technological advancements in methodologies for high-throughput profiling, which provide easy access, rapid screening, low sample consumption, and accurate protein identification, are anticipated to accelerate brain tumor biomarker discovery. Reliable tools for biomarker verification forecast translation of the biomarkers into clinical diagnostics in the foreseeable future. Herein we update the reader on the recent trends and directions in glioma proteomics, including key findings and established and emerging technologies for analysis, together with challenges we are still facing in identifying and verifying potential glioma biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliya Kalinina
- Laboratory of Molecular Neuro-Oncology, Departments of Neurosurgery, Hematology and Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Forshed J, Pernemalm M, Tan CS, Lindberg M, Kanter L, Pawitan Y, Lewensohn R, Stenke L, Lehtiö J. Proteomic data analysis workflow for discovery of candidate biomarker peaks predictive of clinical outcome for patients with acute myeloid leukemia. J Proteome Res 2008; 7:2332-41. [PMID: 18452325 DOI: 10.1021/pr070482e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Our goal in this paper is to show an analytical workflow for selecting protein biomarker candidates from SELDI-MS data. The clinical question at issue is to enable prediction of the complete remission (CR) duration for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. This would facilitate disease prognosis and make individual therapy possible. SELDI-mass spectrometry proteomics analyses were performed on blast cell samples collected from AML patients pre-chemotherapy. Although the biobank available included approximately 200 samples, only 58 were available for analysis. The presented workflow includes sample selection, experimental optimization, repeatability estimation, data preprocessing, data fusion, and feature selection. Specific difficulties have been the small number of samples and the skew distribution of the CR duration among the patients. Further, we had to deal with both noisy SELDI-MS data and a diverse patient cohort. This has been handled by sample selection and several methods for data preprocessing and feature detection in the analysis workflow. Four conceptually different methods for peak detection and alignment were considered, as well as two diverse methods for feature selection. The peak detection and alignment methods included the recently developed annotated regions of significance (ARS) method, the SELDI-MS software Ciphergen Express which was regarded as the standard method, segment-wise spectral alignment by a genetic algorithm (PAGA) followed by binning, and, finally, binning of raw data. In the feature selection, the "standard" Mann-Whitney t test was compared with a hierarchical orthogonal partial least-squares (O-PLS) analysis approach. The combined information from all these analyses gave a collection of 21 protein peaks. These were regarded as the most potential and robust biomarker candidates since they were picked out as significant features in several of the models. The chosen peaks will now be our first choice for the continuing work on protein identification and biological validation. The identification will be performed by chromatographic purification and MALDI MS/MS. Thus, we have shown that the use of several data handling methods can improve a protein profiling workflow from experimental optimization to a predictive model. The framework of this methodology should be seen as general and could be used with other one-dimensional spectral omics data than SELDI MS including an adequate number of samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny Forshed
- Clinical Proteomics, Karolinska Biomics Center, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|