1
|
Brezina S, Leeb G, Baierl A, Gräf E, Hackl M, Hofer P, Lang H, Klein M, Mach K, Schwarzer R, Wlassits W, Püspök A, Gsur A. Evaluation of the "Burgenland PREvention trial of colorectal cancer Disease with ImmunologiCal Testing" (B-PREDICT)-a population-based colorectal cancer screening program. BMC Gastroenterol 2024; 24:149. [PMID: 38689217 PMCID: PMC11061958 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-024-03242-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program B-PREDICT is a population based invited two stage screening project using a faecal immunochemical test (FIT) for initial screening followed by a colonoscopy for those with a positive FIT. B-PREDICT was compared with the opportunistic screening colonoscopy (OPP-COL), performed in course of the nationwide screening program. METHODS Within B-PREDICT all residents of the Austrian federal state Burgenland, aged between 40 and 80 are annually invited to FIT testing. All individuals who underwent initial colonoscopy in Burgenland between 01/2003 and 12/2014, were included in this study. Individuals from the FIT-triggered invited screening program B-PREDICT were compared with those from the non-FIT triggered OPP-COL. RESULTS 15 133 individuals from B-PREDICT were compared to 10 045 individuals with OPP-COL. CRC detection rates were 1.34% (CI-95%, [1.15; 1.52]) in B-PREDICT compared to 0.54% in OPP-COL (95%-CI, [0.39; 0.68] p < 0.001). The decrease in the age standardized incidence rates of CRC was more pronounced in the population screened with FIT than in the general population screened with colonoscopy. Changes in incidence rates per year were -4.4% (95%-CI, [-5.1; -3.7]) vs. -1.8% (95%-CI, [-1.9; -1.6] p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS B-PREDICT shows a two-fold higher detection rate of CRC as well as HRA compared to OPP-COL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie Brezina
- Center for Cancer Research, Medical University of Vienna, Borschkegasse 8a, Vienna, 1090, Austria
| | - Gernot Leeb
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Oberpullendorf, Oberpullendorf, Austria
| | - Andreas Baierl
- Department of Statistics and Operations Research, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Evelyn Gräf
- Institute of Clinical Pathology and Microbiology, Oberwart, Austria
| | | | - Philipp Hofer
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Harald Lang
- Outpatient Clinic for Medical and Chemical Laboratory Diagnostics, Eisenstadt, Austria
| | | | - Karl Mach
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Oberpullendorf, Oberpullendorf, Austria
| | - Remy Schwarzer
- Department of Internal Medicine II, St. John's Hospital, Eisenstadt, Austria
| | - Wilhelm Wlassits
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Oberpullendorf, Oberpullendorf, Austria
| | - Andreas Püspök
- Department of Internal Medicine II, St. John's Hospital, Eisenstadt, Austria
| | - Andrea Gsur
- Center for Cancer Research, Medical University of Vienna, Borschkegasse 8a, Vienna, 1090, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Núñez Rodríguez MªH, Díez Redondo P, Riu Pons F, Cimavilla M, Loza A, Perez-Miranda M. Findings in the distal and proximal colon in colonoscopy screening after positive FIT and related pre-procedure factors. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS : ORGANO OFICIAL DE LA SOCIEDAD ESPANOLA DE PATOLOGIA DIGESTIVA 2022; 114:719-724. [PMID: 35285657 DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8409/2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colonoscopy is the gold standard method for the early diagnosis and prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC). Screening programs include immune determination of blood in feces. Regardless of the method used, proximal colon lesions appear to be detected less frequently. OBJECTIVE Analyze the characteristics of proximal and distal lesions and possible predisposing factors. METHODS A cross-sectional study was performed of 692 patients from the CRC screening program with FIT ≥ 100ngHb/ml (October 2017 - October 2018). The right colon was examined twice as patients were participating in a randomized clinical trial to re-evaluate the right colon by forward-viewing endoscope or proximal retroflexion. The adenoma detection rate (ADR), advanced neoplasia (AN) and CRC in the proximal and distal colon, the histological and morphological characteristics in each section were analyzed. RESULTS 52.9% of the patients were male, with a mean age of 59.5 years (SD: 7.6). 1490 polyps were found and the ADR was 57.7% (distal 42% and proximal 37%). Detection rates were 45.8% for AN, 40.9% for advanced adenomas, 5.2% for advanced SSL and CRC was diagnosed in 4.8% of patients. Males had more AN than females. The mean age of patients with AN was significantly higher. AN were associated with smoking and alcohol consumption (p=0.0001). Globally, FIT levels were higher in patients with AN (p=0.003). Sixty-six per cent of cancers were distally located and 61.3% of CRC were diagnosed in the early stages. CONCLUSIONS In an average-risk asymptomatic population undergoing colonoscopy after positive FIT, AN were more common in the distal colon in males, older patients, smokers and those with alcohol intake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Andrea Loza
- Endoscopias/Digestivo, Hospital Santos Reyes
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Muacevic A, Adler JR, Abushaikha SS, Hamdan AM, Pillai V, Ayash AM, Vincent PK, Sultan K, Al Ejji KM, Singh R, Alabdulla S, Abdulmalik M, Al Kaabi S. High Adenoma Detection Rates in Fecal Immunochemical Test-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening: Interim Results of the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program in Qatar. Cureus 2022; 14:e32274. [PMID: 36628034 PMCID: PMC9822526 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.32274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers globally. Recent reductions in mortality rates have been primarily attributed to screening programs. The State of Qatar established a national bowel cancer screening program in 2016. METHODOLOGY Fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) was used for average-risk individuals aged 50 to 74 years. Fecal immunochemical testing -positive participants were referred for total colonoscopy to detect polyps and cancers. RESULTS Among 32,751 FIT invitees, 11,130 took the test, and 758 (6%) of those were FIT positive. Of these, 375 (56.13%) participants underwent a colonoscopy, and polyps were detected in 198 (52.8%) and cancers in 19 (5.1%) participants. The adenoma detection rate exceeded 40%. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION The high yield of polyps and cancers in the screening program justifies an active, resource-intensive, and organized bowel cancer screening effort. The high adenoma detection rate in a FIT-based program warrants recalibration of target adenoma detection rates in screening programs.
Collapse
|
4
|
Picazo-Perea M, Lopez-Martos A, Rodelgo-Jimenez L, Lorenzo-Lozano M. Sangre oculta en heces en pacientes sintomáticos en Atención Primaria: Un estudio retrospectivo en el área sanitaria de Toledo. Semergen 2022; 48:101815. [DOI: 10.1016/j.semerg.2022.101815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Revised: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/19/2022] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
|
5
|
Toyoshima O, Yamaji Y, Nishizawa T, Yoshida S, Yamada T, Kurokawa K, Obata M, Kondo R, Toba M, Koike K. Priority stratification for colonoscopy based on two-sample faecal immunochemical test screening: results from a cross-sectional study at an endoscopy clinic in Japan. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e046055. [PMID: 34011594 PMCID: PMC8137156 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2020] [Revised: 04/20/2021] [Accepted: 04/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Little has been reported on the yield and characteristics of colorectal neoplasia detected by the two-sample faecal immunochemical test (FIT), particularly the difference between subjects with two-positive results on the two-sample FIT and those with one-positive results. We aimed to assess risk stratification among patients with positive two-sample FIT to prioritise colonoscopy. DESIGN A retrospective cross-sectional study. SETTING A single-centre, representative endoscopy clinic in Japan. PARTICIPANTS Consecutive patients who underwent colonoscopy were enrolled. Indications for colonoscopy included two-positive results on the two-sample FIT (FIT (+/+)), one-positive results on the two-sample FIT (FIT (+/-)), and other reasons (non-FIT group, including presence of symptoms, screening or surveillance). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcomes were detection rates of colorectal cancers, including in situ (all cancers) and invasive cancers, based on the indications for colonoscopy. Secondary outcomes were cancer features, such as location, size, T stage and histological subtype. RESULTS Of the 8724 patients, 264 underwent colonoscopy following FIT (+/+), 1018 following FIT (+/-) and 7442 for reasons other than positive FIT. Detection rates of all (and invasive) cancers in the FIT (+/+), FIT (+/-) and non-FIT groups were 12.1% (8.3%), 1.9% (0.3%) and 0.4% (0.2%), respectively. The cancer detection rates were much higher in the FIT (+/+) group than in the FIT (+/-) group, which in turn had higher rates than the non-FIT group. Moreover, the FIT (+/+) group showed more advanced T stages on tumour, node, metastasis (TNM) classification (Tis/T1/T2/T3/T4: 10/7/4/10/1) than the FIT (+/-) group (16/1/2/0/0, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Two-positive results for two-sample FIT showed a much higher yield for more advanced colorectal cancers than the one-positive result. High priority for diagnostic colonoscopy should be assigned to patients with two-positive-FIT results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Osamu Toyoshima
- Department of Gastroenterology, Toyoshima Endoscopy Clinic, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yutaka Yamaji
- Health Development Center, Tokyo Pharmaceutical Industry Health Insurance Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toshihiro Nishizawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Toyoshima Endoscopy Clinic, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, International University of Health and Welfare, Narita Hosapital, Narita, Japan
| | - Shuntaro Yoshida
- Department of Gastroenterology, Toyoshima Endoscopy Clinic, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomoharu Yamada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Toyoshima Endoscopy Clinic, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ken Kurokawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Toyoshima Endoscopy Clinic, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Miho Obata
- Department of Gastroenterology, Toyoshima Endoscopy Clinic, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryo Kondo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Toyoshima Endoscopy Clinic, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masahito Toba
- Department of Gastroenterology, Toba Clinic, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Koike
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
PPV and Detection Rate of mt-sDNA Testing, FIT, and CT Colonography for Advanced Neoplasia: A Hierarchic Bayesian Meta-Analysis of the Noninvasive Colorectal Screening Tests. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2021; 217:817-830. [PMID: 33703913 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.20.25416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND. Noninvasive tests for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and prevention limit the need for invasive colonoscopy to follow up positive test results. However, the relative performance characteristics of available noninvasive tests have not yet been adequately compared. OBJECTIVE. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the diagnostic performance of the available noninvasive CRC screening tests, including multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) testing, fecal immunochemical testing (FIT), and CT colonography (CTC), with an emphasis on comparison of PPV and detection rate (DR) for advanced neoplasia (AN; encompassing cases of advanced adenomas and CRC). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION. After systematic searches of MEDLINE and Google Scholar databases, 10 mt-sDNA, 27 CTC, and 88 FIT published screening studies involving 25,132, 33,493, and 2,355,958 asymptomatic adults, respectively, were included. Meta-analysis with hierarchic Bayesian modeling was conducted in accordance with Cochrane Collaboration and PRISMA guidelines to determine test positivity rates (TPRs) leading to optical colonoscopy, as well as PPVs and DRs for both AN and CRC. Different positivity thresholds were considered for FIT and CTC. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS. Point estimates (with 95% credible intervals) from pooled Bayesian meta-analysis combining all thresholds for FIT and stratifying CTC results by a polyp size threshold of 6 mm or larger (CTC6) and 10 mm or larger (CTC10) were calculated. TPR was 13.5% (10.9-16.6%) for mt-sDNA testing, 6.4% (5.8-7.2%) for FIT, 13.4% (11.4-15.6%) for CTC6, and 6.6% (5.2-7.7%) for CTC10. AN PPV was 26.9% (95% credible interval, 21.8-33.2%) for mt-sDNA testing, 31.8% (29.3-34.5%) for FIT, 34.4% (27.2-41.0%) for CTC6, and 61.0% (54.0-70.0%) for CTC10. CRC PPV was 2.4% (1.5-3.9%) for mt-sDNA testing, 4.9% (4.3-5.3%) for FIT, 3.5% (2.5-4.8%) for CTC6, and 6.0% (4.3-8.0%) for CTC10. The DR for AN was 3.4% (95% credible interval, 2.5-4.8%) for mt-SDNA, 2.0% (1.8-2.3%) for FIT, 4.8% (4.0-6.5%) for CTC6, and 4.0% (3.0-4.6%) for CTC10. When FIT is restricted to a lower threshold (< 10 μg Hb/g feces), its performance profile is similar to that of mt-sDNA testing, although available data are limited. AN PPV odds ratios (relative to CTC10 as the reference) were 0.24 (95% credible interval, 0.17-0.33) for mt-sDNA testing, 0.30 (0.24-0.45) for FIT, and 0.33 (0.25-0.47) for CTC6. CONCLUSION. Among noninvasive CRC screening tests, CTC with a polyp size threshold of 10 mm or larger most effectively targets AN, preserving detection while also decreasing unnecessary colonoscopies compared with mt-sDNA testing and FIT. CLINICAL IMPACT. CTC performed with a polyp size threshold for colonoscopy referral set at 10 mm or larger represents the most effective and efficient noninvasive screening test for CRC prevention and detection.
Collapse
|
7
|
Navarro M, Hijos G, Sostres C, Lué A, Puente-Lanzarote JJ, Carrera-Lasfuentes P, Lanas A. Reducing the Cut-Off Value of the Fecal Immunochemical Test for Symptomatic Patients Does Not Improve Diagnostic Performance. Front Med (Lausanne) 2020; 7:410. [PMID: 32984360 PMCID: PMC7492376 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2020] [Accepted: 06/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The fecal immunochemical test (FIT) has been established as a cost-effective test in colon cancer screening programmes. This test could also be helpful in symptomatic patients prior to colonoscopy, but data about diagnostic performance, and accurate cut-off values for these patients are still scarce. Materials and Methods: Prospective study that included consecutive unselected patients with gastrointestinal symptoms referred for colonoscopy between November 2016 and June 2018. We performed a FIT (FOB Gold® test, cut-off 20 micrograms of Hb/gram of feces) prior to colonoscopy and determined the accuracy of FIT in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value for clinically significant pathology, advanced neoplasia, and colorectal cancer in symptomatic patients, using two different cut-off values. Results: A total of 727 patients (44.3% men, aged 58.5 ± 14.9 years) was included in the study. The main symptom was history of previous (non-active) rectal bleeding (34.7%), followed by diarrhea (15.0%). Over one quarter of the patients (25.9%) had a positive FIT result. The caecal intubation rate was 95.5%. Clinically significant pathology was identified in 142 colonoscopies (19.5%), advanced neoplasia in 115 (15.8%) and colorectal cancer in 36 colonoscopies (5.0%). FIT performed very well for clinically significant pathology, advanced neoplasia and cancer, with a high negative predictive value (NPV). Reducing the cut-off value to 10 μg/g yielded similar NPV results, with a decrease in specificity. Using a combination of symptoms with a positive FIT result did not improve FIT performance. Only specificity was slightly higher compared to FIT alone, but this was paralleled by a decrease in sensitivity and NPV for cancer and clinically significant pathology. The odds of presenting clinically significant pathology, advanced neoplasia, or cancer increased with FIT concentration. Conclusions: The specificity and NPV of FIT for clinically significant pathology, advanced neoplasia, and cancer are high in symptomatic patients. FIT is a helpful test for determining the need to perform further studies. It may not be necessary to reduce the cut-off value for symptomatic patients, since FIT performance with the current standard cut-off value used in colorectal cancer screening was accurate. FIT can be used to avoid or prioritize colonoscopy procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mercedes Navarro
- Digestive Diseases Service, University Clinic Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Gonzalo Hijos
- Digestive Diseases Service, University Clinic Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Carlos Sostres
- Digestive Diseases Service, University Clinic Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Alberto Lué
- Digestive Diseases Service, University Clinic Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | | | | | - Angel Lanas
- Digestive Diseases Service, University Clinic Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain.,CIBER Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Zaragoza, Spain.,Department of Medicine, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.,IIS Aragón, Zaragoza, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Senore C, Zappa M, Campari C, Crotta S, Armaroli P, Arrigoni A, Cassoni P, Colla R, Fracchia M, Gili F, Grazzini G, Lolli R, Menozzi P, Orione L, Polizzi S, Rapi S, Riggi E, Rubeca T, Sassatelli R, Visioli C, Segnan N. Faecal haemoglobin concentration among subjects with negative FIT results is associated with the detection rate of neoplasia at subsequent rounds: a prospective study in the context of population based screening programmes in Italy. Gut 2020; 69:523-530. [PMID: 31455608 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-318198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2018] [Revised: 08/07/2019] [Accepted: 08/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To estimate the predictive role of faecal haemoglobin (f-Hb) concentration among subjects with faecal immunochemical test (FIT) results below the positivity cut-off for the subsequent risk of advanced neoplasia (AN: colorectal cancer-CRC-or advanced adenoma). DESIGN Prospective cohort of subjects aged 50-69 years, undergoing their first FIT between 1 January 2004 and 31 December 2010 in four population-based programmes in Italy. METHODS All programmes adopted the same analytical procedure (OC Sensor, Eiken Japan), performed every 2 years, on a single sample, with the same positivity cut-off (20 µg Hb/g faeces). We assessed the AN risk at subsequent exams, the cumulative AN detection rate (DR) over the 4-year period following the second FIT and the interval CRC (IC) risk following two negative FITs by cumulative amount of f-Hb concentration over two consecutive negative FITs, using multivariable logistic regression models and the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS The cumulative probability of a positive FIT result over the subsequent two rounds ranged between 7.8% (95% CI 7.5 to 8.2) for subjects with undetectable f-Hb at the initial two tests (50% of the screenees) and 48.4% (95% CI 44.0 to 53.0) among those (0.7% of the screenees) with a cumulative f-Hb concentration ≥20 µg/g faeces. The corresponding figures for cumulative DR were: 1.4% (95% CI 1.3 to 1.6) and 25.5% (95% CI 21.4 to 30.2) for AN; 0.17% (95% CI 0.12 to 0.23) and 4.5% (95% CI 2.8 to 7.1) for CRC. IC risk was also associated with cumulative f-Hb levels. CONCLUSION The association of cumulative f-Hb concentration with subsequent AN and IC risk may allow to design tailored strategies to optimise the utilisation of endoscopy resources: subjects with cumulative f-Hb concentration ≥20 µg/g faeces over two negative tests could be referred immediately for total colonoscopy (TC), while screening interval might be extended for those with undetectable f-Hb.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Senore
- SSD Epidemiologia e screening - CPO, University Hospital Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Marco Zappa
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, ISPRO, Florence, Italy
| | - Cinzia Campari
- Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | | | - Paola Armaroli
- SSD Epidemiologia e screening - CPO, University Hospital Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Arrigo Arrigoni
- University Gastroenterology Unit, Ospedale San Giovanni Antica Sede, Turin, Italy
| | - Paola Cassoni
- Department of Medical Sciences, Universita degli Studi di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Rossana Colla
- Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Mario Fracchia
- Gastroenterology Unit, Mauriziano Umberto I Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Gili
- Colorectal Cancer Screening Laboratory, University Hospital Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Roberto Lolli
- Gastroenterology Unit, Regional Hospital, Aosta, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | - Emilia Riggi
- SSD Epidemiologia e screening - CPO, University Hospital Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Nereo Segnan
- SSD Epidemiologia e screening - CPO, University Hospital Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zorzi M, Zappa M. Synthetic indicator of the impact of colorectal cancer screening programmes on incidence rates. Gut 2020; 69:311-316. [PMID: 31040168 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-318589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2019] [Revised: 04/08/2019] [Accepted: 04/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/08/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The impact of a screening programme on colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence in its target population depends on several variables, including coverage with invitations, participation rate, positivity rate of the screening test, compliance with an invitation to second-level assessment and endoscopists' sensitivity. We propose a synthetic indicator that may account for all the variables influencing the potential impact of a screening programme on CRC incidence. DESIGN We defined the 'rate of advanced adenoma on the target population' (AA-TAP) as the rate of patients who received a diagnosis of advanced adenoma within a screening programme, divided by the programme target population. We computed the AA-TAP for the CRC Italian screening programmes (biennial faecal immunochemical test, target population 50-69 year olds) using the data of the Italian National Survey from 2003 to 2016, overall and by region, and assessed the association between AA-TAP and CRC incidence fitting a linear regression between the trend of regional CRC incidence rates in 50-74 year old subjects and the cumulative AA-TAP. RESULTS In 2016, the AA-TAP at a national level was 105×100 000, whereas significant differences were observed between the northern and central regions (respectively 126 and 149×100 000) and the South and Islands (36×100 000). The cumulative AA-TAP from 2004 to 2012 was significantly correlated with the difference between CRC incidence rates in 2013-2014 and those in 2003-2004 (p=0.009). CONCLUSION The AA-TAP summarises into a single indicator the potential impact of a screening programme in reducing CRC incidence rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Zorzi
- Veneto Tumour Registry, Azienda Zero, Padova, Italy
| | - Marco Zappa
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, ISPRO, Florence, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kooyker AI, Toes-Zoutendijk E, Opstal-van Winden AWJ, Spaander MCW, Buskermolen M, van Vuuren HJ, Kuipers EJ, van Kemenade FJ, Ramakers C, Thomeer MGJ, Dekker E, Nagtegaal ID, de Koning HJ, van Leerdam ME, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I. The second round of the Dutch colorectal cancer screening program: Impact of an increased fecal immunochemical test cut-off level on yield of screening. Int J Cancer 2020; 147:1098-1106. [PMID: 31853977 PMCID: PMC7383838 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2019] [Revised: 11/08/2019] [Accepted: 11/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
The Dutch colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program started in 2014, inviting the target population biennially to perform a fecal immunochemical test (FIT). We obtained prospectively collected data from the national screening information‐system to present the results of the second round (2016) and evaluate the impact of increasing the FIT cut‐off halfway through the first round from 15 to 47 μg Hb/g feces on outcomes in the second round. Second round screening was done with a 47 μg Hb/g feces FIT cut‐off. Participants were classified based on first round participation status as either FIT (15,47) or FIT (47,47) participants, and previous nonparticipants. In total, 348,891 (75.9%) out of 459,740 invitees participated in the second round. Participation rates were 93.4% among previous participants and 21.0% among previous non‐participants. FIT(47,47) participants had a significantly higher detection rate of AN (15.3 vs. 10.4 per 1,000 participants) compared to FIT(15,47) participants in the second round, while their cumulative detection rate of AN over two rounds was significantly lower (45.6 vs. 52.6 per 1,000 participants). Our results showed that participation in the Dutch CRC screening program was consistently high and that second round detection rates depended on the first round FIT cut‐off. The cumulative detection over two rounds was higher among FIT(15,47) participants. These findings suggest that a substantial part of, but not all the missed findings in the first round due to the increased FIT cut‐off were detected in the subsequent round. What's new? In 2014, the Netherlands implemented colorectal cancer (CRC) screening based on non‐invasive fecal immunochemical testing (FIT), which offers a practical approach for population‐based CRC detection. In the Dutch program's first round, to match local resources, FIT cut‐off was increased, resulting in reduced positivity rates and reduced colonoscopy referrals, at the cost of missing advanced neoplasias. The current study shows that many of these missed advanced neoplasias were detected in subsequent screening, suggesting that increased FIT cut‐off had marginal impact on screening outcome. The findings could benefit other CRC screening programs in establishing effective FIT cut‐offs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur I Kooyker
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Gastroenterology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Toes-Zoutendijk
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Manon C W Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maaike Buskermolen
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hanneke J van Vuuren
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ernst J Kuipers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Chris Ramakers
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten G J Thomeer
- Department of Radiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers - Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Harry J de Koning
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Navarro M, Hijos G, Ramirez T, Omella I, Carrera-Lasfuentes P, Lanas Á. Fecal Hemoglobin Concentration, a Good Predictor of Risk of Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Patients. Front Med (Lausanne) 2019; 6:91. [PMID: 31131279 PMCID: PMC6510055 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2018] [Accepted: 04/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Periodical fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) is a cost-effective strategy in colon cancer screening programmes. FIT is also used as a diagnostic test in symptomatic patients, but data, are scarce. Aim: To determine the association between FIT-Hb concentration and the risk of advanced neoplasia (AN) detected in colonoscopy in two different populations. Methods: The outcomes of colonoscopies performed after a positive FIT (>117 ng/ml) (Sentinel Gold test) result were analyzed in patients included within a population-based CRC screening programme (screening group) and, as diagnostic evaluation in symptomatic patients (symptomatic group). The study was performed between January 1st, 2014 and October 31, 2016. Data are reported as medians with interquartile ranges or frequencies and percentages. Positive predictive value (PPV) at arbitrary fecal hemoglobin concentrations were also reported calculated for AN. Results: We recruited 2742 patients who underwent a colonoscopy procedure, 1515 (53.5%) of them within the CRC screening programme. Patients in the screening group were younger (65.0 ± 3.3 vs. 66.2 ± 13.4 years, p < 0.001) and more frequently male (p < 0.001) vs. the symptomatic group. Colonoscopy found more frequently neoplastic lesions in the screening compared to the symptomatic group (61.9 vs. 44.8% p < 0.001). Hb concentration in FIT was significantly higher in patients with AN compared with patients without AN in both groups (p < 0.001). The age-adjusted risk of AN increased significantly in both groups according to FIT Hb concentration in the Quartile 3 [OR (95% CI): 2.94 (2.33–3.71)] and Quartile 4 [OR: 5.52 (4.36–6.99)]. Males, in both groups showed a higher probability of presenting AN. FIT values were higher for left- than for right-sided AN in the screening, but not in the symptomatic group. Positive predictive values for AN were higher in the screening group in positive FIT tests (range 43.9–70.5%; 117 to >1,000 ng/ml) compared to those in the symptomatic group (36.3–52.5%). Similar trends were observed for cancer diagnosis alone. Conclusions: Male gender, age, and FIT Hb concentration are predictors of risk of advanced adenoma and colorectal cancer and can be used to prioritize colonoscopy in patients with suspected advanced neoplasia, both in screening and in symptomatic patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mercedes Navarro
- Service of Digestive Diseases, University Clinic Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Gonzalo Hijos
- Service of Digestive Diseases, University Clinic Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Teresa Ramirez
- Service of Pathology, University Clinic Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | | | | | - Ángel Lanas
- Service of Digestive Diseases, University Clinic Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain.,University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.,CIBERehd, Madrid, Spain.,IIS Aragón, Zaragoza, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ribbing Wilén H, Blom J, Höijer J, Andersson G, Löwbeer C, Hultcrantz R. Fecal immunochemical test in cancer screening - colonoscopy outcome in FIT positives and negatives. Scand J Gastroenterol 2019; 54:303-310. [PMID: 30907196 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2019.1585569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Objectives: Fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is used in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, but evaluations of multiple sample strategies in colonoscopy screening cohorts are rare. The aim of this study was to assess accuracy of FIT for advanced neoplasia (AN) with two fecal samples in a colonoscopy screening cohort. Materials and methods: The study comprised 1155 participants of the colonoscopy arm in SCREESCO (Screening of Swedish Colons, NCT02078804), a randomized controlled study on CRC screening of 60-year-olds from the Swedish average-risk population. Participants provided two FIT samples prior to colonoscopy. First sample, mean of two, and any of the two samples above cut off level were assessed. Colonoscopy findings (CRC, advanced adenoma (AA), AN (CRC + AA) and adenoma characteristics) were evaluated in uni- and multivariable analysis in relation to FIT positivity (at ≥10 µg hemoglobin (Hb)/g). Results: Of 1155 invited, 806 (416 women, 390 men) participated. CRC, AA and non-AA were found in one (0.1%), 80 (9.9%) and 145 (18%), respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for AN were 20%/93%, 25%/92% and 26%/89% for first, mean of two and any of the two samples respectively at cut off level 10 µg/g, corresponding to 60 (74%)-65 (80%) participants with missed AN. The difference in sensitivity between screening strategies was non-significant. The specificity for first sample was significantly higher than for any of the two samples at cut off 10 µg/g (p = .02) and 20 µg/g (p = .04). FIT positivity in participants with adenoma was associated with pedunculated shape (p = .007) and high-risk dysplasia (p = .009). Conclusions: In an average-risk colonoscopy screening cohort of 60-year-olds, sensitivity for AN was modest and did not increase when using two samples instead of one. FIT predominantly detected adenomas with pedunculated shape and high-risk dysplasia, and participants with flat or broad based adenomas may thus be missed in screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanna Ribbing Wilén
- a Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology , Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden.,b Trauma and Reparative Medicine, Division of Emergency Surgery , Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge , Stockholm , Sweden
| | - Johannes Blom
- c Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery , Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm County Council , Stockholm , Sweden
| | - Jonas Höijer
- d Unit of Biostatistics Institute of Environmental Medicine , Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden
| | - Gaya Andersson
- e Department of Clinical Chemistry , Aleris Medilab , Täby , Sweden
| | - Christian Löwbeer
- e Department of Clinical Chemistry , Aleris Medilab , Täby , Sweden.,f Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Clinical Chemistry , Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden
| | - Rolf Hultcrantz
- g Department of Medicine , Solna Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Atkin W, Cross AJ, Kralj-Hans I, MacRae E, Piggott C, Pearson S, Wooldrage K, Brown J, Lucas F, Prendergast A, Marchevsky N, Patel B, Pack K, Howe R, Skrobanski H, Kerrison R, Swart N, Snowball J, Duffy SW, Morris S, von Wagner C, Halloran S. Faecal immunochemical tests versus colonoscopy for post-polypectomy surveillance: an accuracy, acceptability and economic study. Health Technol Assess 2019; 23:1-84. [PMID: 30618357 PMCID: PMC6340104 DOI: 10.3310/hta23010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the UK, patients with one or two adenomas, of which at least one is ≥ 10 mm in size, or three or four small adenomas, are deemed to be at intermediate risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) and referred for surveillance colonoscopy 3 years post polypectomy. However, colonoscopy is costly, can cause discomfort and carries a small risk of complications. OBJECTIVES To determine whether or not annual faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) are effective, acceptable and cost saving compared with colonoscopy surveillance for detecting CRC and advanced adenomas (AAs). DESIGN Diagnostic accuracy study with health psychology assessment and economic evaluation. SETTING Participants were recruited from 30 January 2012 to 30 December 2013 within the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England. PARTICIPANTS Men and women, aged 60-72 years, deemed to be at intermediate risk of CRC following adenoma removal after a positive guaiac faecal occult blood test were invited to participate. Invitees who consented and returned an analysable FIT were included. INTERVENTION We offered participants quantitative FITs at 1, 2 and 3 years post polypectomy. Participants testing positive with any FIT were referred for colonoscopy and not offered further FITs. Participants testing negative were offered colonoscopy at 3 years post polypectomy. Acceptibility of FIT was assessed using discussion groups, questionnaires and interviews. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was 3-year sensitivity of an annual FIT versus colonoscopy at 3 years for detecting advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACN) (CRC and/or AA). Secondary outcomes included participants' surveillance preferences, and the incremental costs and cost-effectiveness of FIT versus colonoscopy surveillance. RESULTS Of 8008 invitees, 5946 (74.3%) consented and returned a round 1 FIT. FIT uptake in rounds 2 and 3 was 97.2% and 96.9%, respectively. With a threshold of 40 µg of haemoglobin (Hb)/g faeces (hereafter referred to as µg/g), positivity was 5.8% in round 1, declining to 4.1% in round 3. Over three rounds, 69.2% (18/26) of participants with CRC, 34.3% (152/443) with AAs and 35.6% (165/463) with ACN tested positive at 40 µg/g. Sensitivity for CRC and AAs increased, whereas specificity decreased, with lower thresholds and multiple rounds. At 40 µg/g, sensitivity and specificity of the first FIT for CRC were 30.8% and 93.9%, respectively. The programme sensitivity and specificity of three rounds at 10 µg/g were 84.6% and 70.8%, respectively. Participants' preferred surveillance strategy was 3-yearly colonoscopy plus annual FITs (57.9%), followed by annual FITs with colonoscopy in positive cases (31.5%). FIT with colonoscopy in positive cases was cheaper than 3-yearly colonoscopy (£2,633,382), varying from £485,236 (40 µg/g) to £956,602 (10 µg/g). Over 3 years, FIT surveillance could miss 291 AAs and eight CRCs using a threshold of 40 µg/g, or 189 AAs and four CRCs using a threshold of 10 µg/g. CONCLUSIONS Annual low-threshold FIT with colonoscopy in positive cases achieved high sensitivity for CRC and would be cost saving compared with 3-yearly colonoscopy. However, at higher thresholds, this strategy could miss 15-30% of CRCs and 40-70% of AAs. Most participants preferred annual FITs plus 3-yearly colonoscopy. Further research is needed to define a clear role for FITs in surveillance. FUTURE WORK Evaluate the impact of ACN missed by FITs on quality-adjusted life-years. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN18040196. FUNDING National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme, NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre and the Bobby Moore Fund for Cancer Research UK. MAST Group Ltd provided FIT kits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendy Atkin
- Cancer Screening and Prevention Research Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Amanda J Cross
- Cancer Screening and Prevention Research Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Ines Kralj-Hans
- Cancer Screening and Prevention Research Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Eilidh MacRae
- Cancer Screening and Prevention Research Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Carolyn Piggott
- Bowel Cancer Screening Programme Southern Hub, Guildford, UK
| | - Sheena Pearson
- Bowel Cancer Screening Programme Southern Hub, Guildford, UK
| | - Kate Wooldrage
- Cancer Screening and Prevention Research Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Jeremy Brown
- Cancer Screening and Prevention Research Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Fiona Lucas
- Cancer Screening and Prevention Research Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Aaron Prendergast
- Cancer Screening and Prevention Research Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Natalie Marchevsky
- Cancer Screening and Prevention Research Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Bhavita Patel
- Cancer Screening and Prevention Research Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Kevin Pack
- Cancer Screening and Prevention Research Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Rosemary Howe
- Cancer Screening and Prevention Research Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Hanna Skrobanski
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Robert Kerrison
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nicholas Swart
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Julia Snowball
- Bowel Cancer Screening Programme Southern Hub, Guildford, UK
| | - Stephen W Duffy
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventative Medicine, Queen Mary University, London, UK
| | - Stephen Morris
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Christian von Wagner
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Auge JM, Rodriguez C, Espanyol O, Rivero L, Sandalinas S, Grau J, Jimenez W, Castells A. An evaluation of the SENTiFIT 270 analyser for quantitation of faecal haemoglobin in the investigation of patients with suspected colorectal cancer. Clin Chem Lab Med 2018; 56:625-633. [PMID: 29150989 DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2017-0605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2017] [Accepted: 10/09/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND An evaluation of SENTiFIT® 270 (Sentinel Diagnostics, Italy; Sysmex, Spain) analyser for the quantitation of faecal haemoglobin (f-Hb) was performed. METHODS The analytical imprecision, linearity, carry over and f-Hb stability were determined. Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy was performed on 487 patients. RESULTS Within-run and between-run imprecision ranged 1.7%-5.1% and 3.8%-6.2%, respectively. Linearity studies revealed a mean recovery of 101.1% (standard deviation, 6.7%) for all dilutions. No carry over was detected below 7650 μg Hb/g faeces. Decay of f-Hb in refrigerated samples ranged 0.2%-0.5% per day. f-Hb in patients with advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACRN) (colorectal cancer [CRC] plus advanced adenoma [AA]) were significantly higher than from those with a normal colonoscopy. Sensitivity for ACRN at f-Hb cutoffs from 10 to 60 μg Hb/g faeces ranged from 28.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 21.7%-37.2%) to 46.5% (95% CI, 38.1%-55%), the specificity ranged from 85% (95% CI, 82.3%-87.3%) to 93.2% (95% CI, 91.2%-94.8%), positive predictive values for detecting CRC and AA ranged from 11.6% (95% CI, 7.6%-17.2%) to 20.6% (95% CI, 13.3%-30.3%) and from 34.7% (95% CI, 28.1%-42%) to 42.3% (95% CI, 32.4%-52.7%), respectively, and the negative predictive value for ACRN ranged from 90.2% (95% CI, 87.9%-92.2%) to 88.4% (95% CI, 86%-90.4%). Using two samples per patient sensitivity increased with a slight decrease in specificity. CONCLUSIONS The analytical and clinical performances of SENTiFIT assay demonstrate a specific and accurate test for detecting ACRN in symptomatic patients and those undergoing surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josep M Auge
- Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics Department, Biomedical Diagnostic Center, Hospital Clinic, C/Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Cristina Rodriguez
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; and IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Oihana Espanyol
- Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics Department, Biomedical Diagnostic Center, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Liseth Rivero
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; and IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Silvia Sandalinas
- Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics Department, Biomedical Diagnostic Center, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jaume Grau
- Unit of Evaluation, Support and Prevention, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Wladimiro Jimenez
- Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics Department, Biomedical Diagnostic Center, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antoni Castells
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; and IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Interval cancers after negative immunochemical test compared to screen and non-responders' detected cancers in Slovenian colorectal cancer screening programme. Radiol Oncol 2018; 52:413-421. [PMID: 30511936 PMCID: PMC6287176 DOI: 10.2478/raon-2018-0025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2018] [Accepted: 05/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We assessed the incidence and characteristics of interval cancers after faecal immunochemical occult blood test and calculated the test sensitivity in Slovenian colorectal cancer screening programme. Patients and methods The analysis included the population aged between 50 to 69 years, which was invited for screening between April 2011 and December 2012. The persons were followed-up until the next foreseen invitation, in average for 2 years. The data on interval cancers and cancers in non-responders were obtained from cancer registry. Gender, age, years of schooling, the cancer site and stage were compared among three observed groups. We used the proportional incidence method to calculate the screening test sensitivity. Results Among 502,488 persons invited for screening, 493 cancers were detected after positive screening test, 79 interval cancers after negative faecal immunochemical test and 395 in non-responders. The proportion of interval cancers was 13.8%. Among the three observed groups cancers were more frequent in men (p = 0.009) and in persons aged 60+ years (p < 0.001). Comparing screen detected and cancers in non-responders with interval cancers more interval cancers were detected in persons with 10 years of schooling or more (p = 0.029 and p = 0.001), in stage III (p = 0.027) and IV (p < 0.001), and in right hemicolon (p < 0.001). Interval cancers were more frequently in stage I than non-responders cancers (p = 0.004). Test sensitivity of faecal immunochemical test was 88.45%. Conclusions Interval cancers in Slovenian screening programme were detected in expected proportions as in similar programmes. Test sensitivity was among the highest when compared to similar programmes and was accomplished using test kit for two stool samples.
Collapse
|
16
|
Overall evaluation of an immunological latex agglutination system for fecal occult blood testing in the colorectal cancer screening program of Florence. Int J Biol Markers 2018; 27:e195-202. [DOI: 10.5301/jbm.2012.9343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/16/2012] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Several immunological fecal occult blood tests (FOBT) are currently available for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. We compared the HM Jack (Jack) (Kiowa, Japan), with the OC-Hemodia (OC) (Eiken, Japan) in use in the Florence screening program. Aims of the study were: (i) to investigate the diagnostic performance and the best cutoff value for Jack; (ii) to evaluate the handiness of sampling tubes; (iii) to compare costs. A total of 5,044 subjects were screened with both tests. Sampling tube investigation was performed running each sample on both instruments. A number of 352 subjects positive for at least one test (175 OC, 310 Jack) were selected for further investigations, while 46 subjects refused further assessments. Analysis of costs related to the assessment phase was performed on the basis of Tuscany region's fares. Amongst the 306 subjects investigated, 9 CRC and 67 advanced adenomas (AdA) were detected. Detection rates (DR) were 1.4‰ for CRC and 9.6‰ for AdA. After Jack cutoff optimization, DR for CRC+AdA resulted in 11.1‰ for OC and 13.3‰ for Jack (p=0.041). Sensitivity of the methods was 73.7 for OC and 88.2 for Jack; specificity was 97.6 for OC and 96.0 for Jack, resulting in an increase of the required assessments from 3.5% to 5.1%. No differences were observed between sampling methods. Despite the lower specificity of Jack, its greater sensitivity makes the method attractive for screening programs. An increase of the costs of 30% for every subject investigated for pathological lesion (CRC+AdA) may be thus foreseen.
Collapse
|
17
|
Maida M, Macaluso FS, Ianiro G, Mangiola F, Sinagra E, Hold G, Maida C, Cammarota G, Gasbarrini A, Scarpulla G. Screening of colorectal cancer: present and future. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2017; 17:1131-1146. [PMID: 29022408 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2017.1392243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in males and second in females, and the fourth most common cause of cancer death worldwide. Currently, about 60-70% of diagnosed cases in symptomatic patients are detected at an advanced stage of disease. Earlier stage detection through the use of screening strategies would allow for better outcomes in terms of reducing the disease burden. Areas covered: The aim of this paper is to review the current published evidence from literature which assesses the performance and effectiveness of different screening tests for the early detection of CRC. Expert commentary: Adequate screening strategies can reduce CRC incidence and mortality. In the last few decades, several tests have been proposed for CRC screening. To date, there is still insufficient evidence to identify which approach is definitively superior, and no screening strategy for CRC can therefore be defined as universally ideal. The best strategy would be the one that can be economically viable and to which the patient can adhere best to over time. The latest guidelines suggest colonoscopy every 10 years or annual fecal immuno-chemical test (FIT) for people with normal risk, while for individuals with high risk or hereditary syndromes specific recommendations are provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcello Maida
- a Section of Gastroenterology , S.Elia - Raimondi Hospital , Caltanissetta , Italy
| | | | - Gianluca Ianiro
- c Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology & Liver Unit , Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore , Rome , Italy
| | - Francesca Mangiola
- c Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology & Liver Unit , Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore , Rome , Italy
| | - Emanuele Sinagra
- d Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit , Fondazione Istituto San Raffaele Giglio , Cefalù , Italy
| | - Georgina Hold
- e School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition , University of Aberdeen , Aberdeen , UK
| | - Carlo Maida
- f Section of Internal Medicine , DIBIMIS, University of Palermo , Palermo , Italy
| | - Giovanni Cammarota
- c Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology & Liver Unit , Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore , Rome , Italy
| | - Antonio Gasbarrini
- c Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology & Liver Unit , Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore , Rome , Italy
| | - Giuseppe Scarpulla
- a Section of Gastroenterology , S.Elia - Raimondi Hospital , Caltanissetta , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hansen AT, Hoffmann-Lücke E, Nielsen BK, Reinholdt B, Hindersson P, Heidemann K, Hornung N. Delayed sample arrival at the laboratory does not lead to more false negatives in the Danish population screening for colorectal cancer. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation 2017; 77:685-688. [DOI: 10.1080/00365513.2017.1379091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Anette Tarp Hansen
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Elke Hoffmann-Lücke
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
| | - Betina Klint Nielsen
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Slagelse, Naestved, and Nykøbing Falster Hospitals, Slagelse, Denmark
| | | | - Peter Hindersson
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjørring, Denmark
| | - Karin Heidemann
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark
| | - Nete Hornung
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Projected effect of fecal immunochemical test threshold for colorectal cancer screening on outcomes and costs for Canada using the OncoSim microsimulation model. J Cancer Policy 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2017.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
20
|
Aniwan S, Ratanachu-Ek T, Pongprasobchai S, Limsrivilai J, Praisontarangkul OA, Pisespongsa P, Mairiang P, Sangchan A, Sottisuporn J, Wisedopas N, Kullavanijaya P, Rerknimitr R. Impact of Fecal Hb Levels on Advanced Neoplasia Detection and the Diagnostic Miss Rate For Colorectal Cancer Screening in High-Risk vs. Average-Risk Subjects: a Multi-Center Study. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 2017; 8:e113. [PMID: 28796231 PMCID: PMC5587841 DOI: 10.1038/ctg.2017.40] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2017] [Accepted: 07/08/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives: The Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening (APCS) scoring system was developed to identify high-risk subjects for advanced neoplasia. However, the appropriate fecal immunochemical test (FIT) cutoff for high-risk population may be different from that of average-risk population. We aimed to evaluate the FIT performance at different cutoffs in high-risk subjects undergoing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Methods: We prospectively enrolled asymptomatic subjects aged 50–75 years. Using the APCS score, subjects were stratified into either the average-risk or high-risk groups. All subjects were tested with one-time quantitative FIT and underwent colonoscopy. We compared the FIT performance for advanced neoplasia between two groups using different cutoffs (5 (FIT5), 10 (FIT10), 20 (FIT20), 30 (FIT30), and 40 (FIT40) μg Hb/g feces). Results: Overall, 1,713 subjects were recruited, and 1,222 (71.3%) and 491 (28.7%) were classified as average-risk and high-risk, respectively. Advanced neoplasia was detected in 90 (7.4%) of the average-risk subjects and 65 (13.2%) of the high-risk subjects. In the high-risk group, by decreasing the cutoff from FIT40 to FIT5, the sensitivity increased by 33.8 percentage points with decreased specificity by 11 percentage points. In the average-risk group, the sensitivity increased by 20 percentage points with decreased specificity by 9.6 percentage points. At the lowest cutoff (FIT5), the number of needed colonoscopies to find one advanced neoplasia was 2.8 and 6.1 for the high-risk and average-risk groups, respectively. Conclusions: Using an appropriate FIT cutoff for CRC screening in high-risk subjects could improve CRC screening performance and reduce the unnecessary colonoscopies. To maintain high sensitivity and specificity for advanced neoplasia, the optimal cutoff FIT in the high-risk subjects should be lower than that in the average-risk subjects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satimai Aniwan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, The Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | - Supot Pongprasobchai
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Julajak Limsrivilai
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Ong-Ard Praisontarangkul
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Pises Pisespongsa
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Pisaln Mairiang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
| | - Apichat Sangchan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
| | - Jaksin Sottisuporn
- NKC Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkla, Thailand
| | - Naruemon Wisedopas
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Pinit Kullavanijaya
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, The Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Rungsun Rerknimitr
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, The Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Shin HY, Suh M, Baik HW, Choi KS, Park B, Jun JK, Hwang SH, Kim BC, Lee CW, Oh JH, Lee YK, Han DS, Lee DH. Performance of the Fecal Immunochemical Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening Using Different Stool-Collection Devices: Preliminary Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial. Gut Liver 2017; 10:925-931. [PMID: 27282262 PMCID: PMC5087932 DOI: 10.5009/gnl15479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2015] [Revised: 12/24/2015] [Accepted: 01/15/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background/Aims We are in the process of conducting a randomized trial to determine whether compliance with the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) for colorectal cancer screening differs according to the stool-collection method. This study was an interim analysis of the performance of two stool-collection devices (sampling bottle vs conventional container). Methods In total, 1,701 individuals (age range, 50 to 74 years) were randomized into the sampling bottle group (intervention arm) or the conventional container group (control arm). In both groups, we evaluated the FIT positivity rate, the positive predictive value for advanced neoplasia, and the detection rate for advanced neoplasia. Results The FIT positivity rates were 4.1% for the sampling bottles and 2.0% for the conventional containers; these values were significantly different. The positive predictive values for advanced neoplasia in the sampling bottles and conventional containers were 11.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], −3.4 to 25.6) and 12.0% (95% CI, −0.7 to 24.7), respectively. The detection rates for advanced neoplasia in the sampling bottles and conventional containers were 4.5 per 1,000 persons (95% CI, 2.0 to 11.0) and 2.4 per 1,000 persons (95% CI, 0.0 to 5.0), respectively. Conclusions The impact of these findings on FIT screening performance was unclear in this interim analysis. This impact should therefore be evaluated in the final analysis following the final enrollment period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hye Young Shin
- National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Mina Suh
- National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Hyung Won Baik
- National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.,Lung Cancer Clinic, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kui Son Choi
- National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Boyoung Park
- National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jae Kwan Jun
- National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Sang-Hyun Hwang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Center for Diagnostic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Byung Chang Kim
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, National Cancer Center Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Chan Wha Lee
- Center for Cancer Prevention & Detection, National Cancer Center Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jae Hwan Oh
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, National Cancer Center Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - You Kyoung Lee
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea
| | - Dong Soo Han
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Guri, Korea
| | - Do-Hoon Lee
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Center for Diagnostic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Navarro M, Nicolas A, Ferrandez A, Lanas A. Colorectal cancer population screening programs worldwide in 2016: An update. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23:3632-3642. [PMID: 28611516 PMCID: PMC5449420 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i20.3632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 344] [Impact Index Per Article: 49.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2017] [Revised: 03/21/2017] [Accepted: 05/04/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer in the world. The incidence and mortality show wide geographical variations. Screening is recommended to reduce both incidence and mortality. However, there are significant differences among studies in implementation strategies and detection. This review aimed to present the results and strategies of different screening programs worldwide. We reviewed the literature on national and international screening programs published in PubMed, on web pages, and in clinical guidelines. CRC Screening programs are currently underway in most European countries, Canada, specific regions in North and South America, Asia, and Oceania. The most extensive screening strategies were based on fecal occult blood testing, and more recently, the fecal immunochemical test (FIT). Participation in screening has varied greatly among different programs. The Netherlands showed the highest participation rate (68.2%) and some areas of Canada showed the lowest (16%). Participation rates were highest among women and in programs that used the FIT test. Men exhibited the greatest number of positive results. The FIT test has been the most widely used screening program worldwide. The advent of this test has increased participation rates and the detection of positive results.
Collapse
|
23
|
Aniwan S, Ratanachu Ek T, Pongprasobchai S, Limsrivilai J, Praisontarangkul OA, Pisespongsa P, Mairiang P, Sangchan A, Sottisuporn J, Wisedopas N, Kullavanijaya P, Rerknimitr R. The Optimal Cut-Off Level of The Fecal Immunochemical Test For Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Country with Limited Colonoscopy Resources: A Multi-Center Study from Thailand. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2017; 18:405-412. [PMID: 28345822 PMCID: PMC5454735 DOI: 10.22034/apjcp.2017.18.2.405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Selecting the cut-off point for the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs is of prime importance. The balance between the test performance for detecting advanced neoplasia and the available colonoscopy resources should be considered. We aimed to identify the optimal cut-off of FIT for advanced neoplasia in order to minimize colonoscopy burden. Methods: We conducted a multi-center study in 6 hospitals from diverse regions of Thailand. Asymptomatic participants, aged 50-75 years, were tested with one-time quantitative FIT (OC-SENSOR, Eiken Chemical Co.,Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and all participants underwent colonoscopy. We assessed test performance in detecting advanced neoplasia (advanced adenoma and CRC) and measured the burden of colonoscopy with different cut-offs [25 (FIT25), 50 (FIT50), 100 (FIT100), 150 (FIT150), and 200 (FIT200)ng/ml]. Results: Among 1,479 participants, advanced neoplasia and CRC were found in 137 (9.3%) and 14 (0.9%), respectively. From FIT25 to FIT200, the positivity rate decreased from 18% to 4.9%. For advanced neoplasia, an increased cut-off decreased sensitivity from 42.3% to 16.8% but increased specificity from 84.2% to 96.3%. The increased cut-off increased the positive predictive value (PPV) from 21.5% to 31.5%. However, all cut-off points provided a high negative predictive value (NPV) (>90%). For CRC, the miss rate for FIT25 to FIT 150 was the same (n=3, 21%), whereas that with FIT200 increased to 35% (n=5). Conclusions: In a country with limited-colonoscopy resources, using FIT150 may be preferred because it offers both high PPV and NPV for advanced neoplasia detection. It could also decrease colonoscopy workload, while maintaining a CRC miss rate similar to those with lower cut-offs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satimai Aniwan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, The Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kapidzic A, van Roon AHC, van Leerdam ME, van Vuuren AJ, van Ballegooijen M, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Spijker W, Izelaar K, Hol L, Kuipers EJ. Attendance and diagnostic yield of repeated two-sample faecal immunochemical test screening for colorectal cancer. Gut 2017; 66:118-123. [PMID: 26370109 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2014] [Revised: 08/24/2015] [Accepted: 08/26/2015] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Limited data exist on attendance and additional yield of 2-sample faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) screening during multiple rounds. We therefore conducted a population-based colorectal cancer screening trial comparing attendance and yield of repeated 1-sample and 2-sample FIT screenings. DESIGN Two randomly selected groups of average-risk subjects aged 50-74 years were invited for two rounds of either 1-sample (n=5007) or 2-sample (n=3197) FIT (OC-sensor Micro) screening. The test was considered positive if at least one sample was positive (cut-off 50 ng/mL; 10 µg haemoglobin/g). RESULTS The cumulative attendance rate was similar for repeated 1-sample and 2-sample FIT screenings (1-sample FIT: 68.1%; 2-sample FIT: 67.1%, p=0.368). The positivity rate in the second round was lower for 1-sample FIT (6.2%, 95% CI 5.4% to 7.2%) than for 2-sample FIT (8.4%, 95% CI 7.1% to 9.8%, p=0.007), whereas the detection rate of advanced neoplasia (AN, 1-sample FIT: 1.9%, 95% CI 1.2% to 2.2%; 2-sample FIT: 1.7%, 95% CI 1.2% to 2.5%, p=0.861) and the positive predictive value (1-sample FIT: 32%, 95% CI 24% to 40%; 2-sample FIT: 21%, 95% CI 15% to 29%, p=0.075) did not differ. After two rounds of screening, the cumulative diagnostic yield of AN for 1-sample FIT was 29.3 per 1000 invitees, compared with 34.0 for 2-sample FIT (p=0.241). CONCLUSIONS Using 2-sample FIT instead of 1-sample FIT does not result in a higher detection rate of AN in the second round of repeated FIT screening. Furthermore, both strategies lead to a similar yield of AN over two rounds. These findings imply that 1-sample FIT screening is preferred over 2-sample FIT screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atija Kapidzic
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Aafke H C van Roon
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anneke J van Vuuren
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wolfert Spijker
- Regional Organization for Population Screening South-West Netherlands, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kirsten Izelaar
- Regional Organization for Population Screening South-West Netherlands, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lieke Hol
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ernst J Kuipers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Sali L, Regge D. CT colonography for population screening of colorectal cancer: hints from European trials. Br J Radiol 2016; 89:20160517. [PMID: 27542076 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20160517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
CT colonography (CTC) is a minimally invasive radiological investigation of the colon. Robust evidence indicates that CTC is safe, well tolerated and highly accurate for the detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) and large polyps, which are the targets of screening. Randomized controlled trials were carried out in Europe to evaluate CTC as the primary test for population screening of CRC in comparison with faecal immunochemical test (FIT), sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy. Main outcomes were participation rate and detection rate. Participation rate for screening CTC was in the range of 25-34%, whereas the detection rate of CTC for CRC and advanced adenoma was in the range of 5.1-6.1%. Participation for CTC screening was lower than that for FIT, similar to that for sigmoidoscopy and higher than that for colonoscopy. The detection rate of CTC was higher than that of one FIT round, similar to that of sigmoidoscopy and lower than that of colonoscopy. However, owing to the higher participation rate in CTC screening with respect to colonoscopy screening, the detection rates per invitee of CTC and colonoscopy would be comparable. These results justify consideration of CTC in organized screening programmes for CRC. However, assessment of other factors such as polyp size threshold for colonoscopy referral, management of extracolonic findings and, most importantly, the forthcoming results of cost-effectiveness analyses are crucial to define the role of CTC in primary screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lapo Sali
- 1 Department of Biomedical Experimental and Clinical Sciences Mario Serio, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Daniele Regge
- 2 Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche, Università di Torino, Turin, Italy.,3 Candiolo Cancer Institute FPO, IRCCS, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Juul JS, Bro F, Hornung N, Andersen BS, Laurberg S, Olesen F, Vedsted P. Implementation of immunochemical faecal occult blood test in general practice: a study protocol using a cluster-randomised stepped-wedge design. BMC Cancer 2016; 16:445. [PMID: 27400657 PMCID: PMC4940713 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-016-2477-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2016] [Accepted: 06/30/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer is a common malignancy and a leading cause of cancer-related death. Half of patients with colorectal cancer initially present with non-specific or vague symptoms. In the need for a safe low-cost test, the immunochemical faecal occult blood test (iFOBT) may be part of the evaluation of such patients in primary care. Currently, Danish general practitioners have limited access to this test. The aim of this article is to describe a study that will assess the uptake and clinical use of iFOBT in general practice. Furthermore, it will investigate the diagnostic value and the clinical implications of using iFOBT in general practice on patients presenting with non-alarm symptoms of colorectal cancer. METHODS/DESIGN The study uses a cluster-randomised stepped-wedge design and is conducted in the Central Denmark Region among 836 GPs in 381 general practices. The municipalities of the Region and their appertaining general practitioners will be included sequentially in the study during the first 7 months of the 1-year study period. The following intervention has been developed for the study: a mandatory intervention providing all general practitioners with a starting package of 10 iFOBTs, a clinical instruction on iFOBT use in general practice and online information material from the date of inclusion, and an optional intervention consisting of a continuous medical education on colorectal cancer diagnostics and use of iFOBT. DISCUSSION This study is among the first and largest trials to investigate the diagnostic use and the clinical value of iFOBT on patients presenting with non-alarm symptoms of colorectal cancer. The findings will be of national and international importance for the future planning of colorectal cancer diagnostics, particularly for 'low-risk-but-not-no-risk' patients with non-alarm symptoms of colorectal cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION A Trial of the Implementation of iFOBT in General Practice NCT02308384 . Date of registration: 26 November 2014.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jakob Søgaard Juul
- Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 2, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark. .,Research Centre for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 2, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.
| | - Flemming Bro
- Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 2, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark
| | - Nete Hornung
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Regional Hospital of Randers, Skovlyvej 1, 8930, Randers NE, Denmark
| | - Berit Sanne Andersen
- Department of Public Health Programs, Regional Hospital of Randers, Skovlyvej 1, 8930, Randers NE, Denmark
| | - Søren Laurberg
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Tage Hansens Gade 2, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark
| | - Frede Olesen
- Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 2, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark
| | - Peter Vedsted
- Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 2, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.,Research Centre for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 2, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Iannone A, Losurdo G, Pricci M, Girardi B, Massaro A, Principi M, Barone M, Ierardi E, Di Leo A. Stool Investigations for Colorectal Cancer Screening: From Occult Blood Test to DNA Analysis. J Gastrointest Cancer 2016; 47:143-51. [PMID: 26922358 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-016-9810-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We report an update of current methods for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening based on fecal sample analysis. METHODS A systematic review of the literature was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Science Direct electronic databases. RESULTS Blood in the stools is the first and most used strategy. Fecal occult blood test (FOBT) and fecal immunochemical test (FIT) are the main methods. Both are economic, easy to perform with high specificity, and low sensitivity. Based on CRC multi-step process with genetic and epigenetic alterations in large bowel cell DNA, single mutations or panels of alterations have been detected. These tests have the advantage of a marked improvement of the sensitivity when compared to fecal blood. However, high costs, poor availability, and correct choice of marker panel represent the major limits. A specific sDNA panel including aberrantly methylated BMP3 and NDRG4 promoter regions, mutant k-ras and β-actin (a reference gene for human DNA quantity), and an immunochemical assay for human hemoglobin has been recently approved by Food and Drug Administration. Novel promising biomarkers for CRC screening are represented by microRNAs (miRNAs), a group of 18-25 nucleotide non-coding RNA molecules that regulate gene expression. Reports on these fecal biomarkers are case-control studies, and each of them evaluates single miRNAs or multi-target panels. On the other hand, some fecal proteins have been studied as possible CRC screening markers, even though they demonstrated poor results. Finally, alterations of estrogen receptor-beta (i.e., dramatic reduction in the early stage of CRC) have been demonstrated in tissue samples. CONCLUSIONS Specific investigations are warranted in order to add further noninvasive markers to the panel of CRC screening tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Iannone
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Losurdo
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Maria Pricci
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Bruna Girardi
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Antonio Massaro
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Mariabeatrice Principi
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Michele Barone
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Enzo Ierardi
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Alfredo Di Leo
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Alvarez-Urturi C, Andreu M, Hernandez C, Perez-Riquelme F, Carballo F, Ono A, Cruzado J, Cubiella J, Hernandez V, Mao CG, Perez E, Salas D, Andrés M, Bujanda L, Portillo I, Sarasqueta C, Quintero E, Morillas JD, Lanas A, Sostres C, Augé JM, Castells A, Bessa X. Impact of age- and gender-specific cut-off values for the fecal immunochemical test for hemoglobin in colorectal cancer screening. Dig Liver Dis 2016; 48:542-551. [PMID: 26936343 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2016.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2015] [Revised: 01/15/2016] [Accepted: 02/01/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is no information on the impact of age and gender on the diagnostic yield of different positivity thresholds for the fecal immunochemical test for hemoglobin (FIT). OBJECTIVES To evaluate the performance of this test at distinct positivity cut-offs in a population-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program. METHODS CRC detection rate (DR), and analysis of resources were evaluated retrospectively, at different cut-offs of FIT (20, 25, 30, 35 and 40μg Hb/g) respect to a reference value (15μg Hb/g), according to age and gender, in a screening population of 10,611 participants of the ColonPrev study (Quintero. NEJM 2013). RESULTS At the reference cut-off value, 36 CRC and 252 advanced adenomas (AA) were diagnosed. Increasing the cut-off in women ≤60 years decreases colonoscopies performed by 44.5% without modifying the CRC (DR). Same CRC DR was observed in men ≤60 years and women >60 years increasing cut-off at 25-30μg Hb/g. In men >60 years, all increases in the cut-off affected the CRC DR, especially when the cut-off was increased from 35 to 40μg Hb/g (CRC miss rate 25%). CONCLUSIONS To improve the performance of FIT in CRC screening programs, FIT cut-offs could be individualized by age and gender.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Alvarez-Urturi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital del Mar, Cancer Research Program, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Autonomous University of Barcelona and Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Montserrat Andreu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital del Mar, Cancer Research Program, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Autonomous University of Barcelona and Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Cristina Hernandez
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, Hospital del Mar, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Francisco Perez-Riquelme
- Colorectal Cancer Prevention Program of Murcia, Dirección General de Salud Pública, Consejería de Sanidad y Política Social, Murcia, Spain
| | - Fernando Carballo
- Colorectal Cancer Prevention Program of Murcia, Dirección General de Salud Pública, Consejería de Sanidad y Política Social, Murcia, Spain
| | - Akiko Ono
- Colorectal Cancer Prevention Program of Murcia, Dirección General de Salud Pública, Consejería de Sanidad y Política Social, Murcia, Spain
| | - Jose Cruzado
- Colorectal Cancer Prevention Program of Murcia, Dirección General de Salud Pública, Consejería de Sanidad y Política Social, Murcia, Spain
| | - Joaquín Cubiella
- Department of Gastroenterology, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense, IBIV - Institute of Biomedical Research of Vigo, Vigo, Spain
| | - Vicent Hernandez
- Department of Gastroenterology, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense, IBIV - Institute of Biomedical Research of Vigo, Vigo, Spain
| | | | - Elena Perez
- Colorectal Cancer Screening Program, Dirección General de Salud Pública, València, Spain
| | - Dolores Salas
- Colorectal Cancer Screening Program, Dirección General de Salud Pública, València, Spain
| | - Mercedes Andrés
- Colorectal Cancer Screening Program, Dirección General de Salud Pública, València, Spain
| | - Luis Bujanda
- Department of Gastroenterology, Donostia Hospital-Instituto Biodonostia, CIBERehd, University of Basque Country (UPV/EHU), San Sebastián, Spain
| | - Isabel Portillo
- Centro Coordinador del Programa de Cribado Cáncer Colorrectal, Organización Central de Osakidetza-Servicio Vasco de Salud, San Sebastián, Spain
| | - Cristina Sarasqueta
- Hospital Donostia, Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), San Sebastián, Spain
| | - Enrique Quintero
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | | | - Angel Lanas
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Zaragoza, IIS Aragón, CIBERehd, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Carlos Sostres
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Zaragoza, IIS Aragón, CIBERehd, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Josep Maria Augé
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Antoni Castells
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínic, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Xavier Bessa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital del Mar, Cancer Research Program, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Autonomous University of Barcelona and Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
John JS, Grogan P. Compelling new data on the effectiveness of Australia's National Bowel Cancer Screening Program: A model for best practice? Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2016; 12:7-9. [DOI: 10.1111/ajco.12484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- James St John
- Prevention Division; Cancer Council Victoria; 615 St Kilda Road VIC 3144
- Department of Medicine at The Royal Melbourne Hospital; The University of Melbourne; Melbourne VIC 3050
| | - Paul Grogan
- Cancer Council Australia; Level 14, 477 Pitt Street Sydney NSW 2000 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Sali L, Mascalchi M, Falchini M, Ventura L, Carozzi F, Castiglione G, Delsanto S, Mallardi B, Mantellini P, Milani S, Zappa M, Grazzini G. Reduced and Full-Preparation CT Colonography, Fecal Immunochemical Test, and Colonoscopy for Population Screening of Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2016; 108:djv319. [PMID: 26719225 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djv319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2015] [Accepted: 10/05/2015] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Population screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) is widely adopted, but the preferred strategy is still under debate. We aimed to compare reduced (r-CTC) and full cathartic preparation CT colonography (f-CTC), fecal immunochemical test (FIT), and optical colonoscopy (OC) as primary screening tests for CRC. METHODS Citizens of a district of Florence, Italy, age 54 to 65 years, were allocated (8:2.5:2.5:1) with simple randomization to be invited by mail to one of four screening interventions: 1) biennial FIT for three rounds, 2) r-CTC, 3) f-CTC, 4) OC. Patients tested positive to FIT or CTC (at least one polyp ≥6mm) were referred to OC work-up. The primary outcomes were participation rate and detection rate (DR) for cancer or advanced adenoma (advanced neoplasia). All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS Sixteen thousand eighty-seven randomly assigned subjects were invited to the assigned screening test. Participation rates were 50.4% (4677/9288) for first-round FIT, 28.1% (674/2395) for r-CTC, 25.2% (612/2430) for f-CTC, and 14.8% (153/1036) for OC. All differences between groups were statistically significant (P = .047 for r-CTC vs f-CTC; P < .001 for all others). DRs for advanced neoplasia were 1.7% (79/4677) for first-round FIT, 5.5% (37/674) for r-CTC, 4.9% (30/612) for f-CTC, and 7.2% (11/153) for OC. Differences in DR between CTC groups and FIT were statistically significant (P < .001), but not between r-CTC and f-CTC (P = .65). CONCLUSIONS Reduced preparation increases participation in CTC. Lower attendance and higher DR of CTC as compared with FIT are key factors for the optimization of its role in population screening of CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lapo Sali
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences 'Mario Serio', University of Florence, Florence, Italy (LS, MM, MF, SM); Cancer Prevention and Research Institute (ISPO), Florence, Italy (LV, FC, GC, BM, PM, MZ, GG); im3D S.p.A., Turin, Italy (SD).
| | - Mario Mascalchi
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences 'Mario Serio', University of Florence, Florence, Italy (LS, MM, MF, SM); Cancer Prevention and Research Institute (ISPO), Florence, Italy (LV, FC, GC, BM, PM, MZ, GG); im3D S.p.A., Turin, Italy (SD)
| | - Massimo Falchini
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences 'Mario Serio', University of Florence, Florence, Italy (LS, MM, MF, SM); Cancer Prevention and Research Institute (ISPO), Florence, Italy (LV, FC, GC, BM, PM, MZ, GG); im3D S.p.A., Turin, Italy (SD)
| | - Leonardo Ventura
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences 'Mario Serio', University of Florence, Florence, Italy (LS, MM, MF, SM); Cancer Prevention and Research Institute (ISPO), Florence, Italy (LV, FC, GC, BM, PM, MZ, GG); im3D S.p.A., Turin, Italy (SD)
| | - Francesca Carozzi
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences 'Mario Serio', University of Florence, Florence, Italy (LS, MM, MF, SM); Cancer Prevention and Research Institute (ISPO), Florence, Italy (LV, FC, GC, BM, PM, MZ, GG); im3D S.p.A., Turin, Italy (SD)
| | - Guido Castiglione
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences 'Mario Serio', University of Florence, Florence, Italy (LS, MM, MF, SM); Cancer Prevention and Research Institute (ISPO), Florence, Italy (LV, FC, GC, BM, PM, MZ, GG); im3D S.p.A., Turin, Italy (SD)
| | - Silvia Delsanto
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences 'Mario Serio', University of Florence, Florence, Italy (LS, MM, MF, SM); Cancer Prevention and Research Institute (ISPO), Florence, Italy (LV, FC, GC, BM, PM, MZ, GG); im3D S.p.A., Turin, Italy (SD)
| | - Beatrice Mallardi
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences 'Mario Serio', University of Florence, Florence, Italy (LS, MM, MF, SM); Cancer Prevention and Research Institute (ISPO), Florence, Italy (LV, FC, GC, BM, PM, MZ, GG); im3D S.p.A., Turin, Italy (SD)
| | - Paola Mantellini
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences 'Mario Serio', University of Florence, Florence, Italy (LS, MM, MF, SM); Cancer Prevention and Research Institute (ISPO), Florence, Italy (LV, FC, GC, BM, PM, MZ, GG); im3D S.p.A., Turin, Italy (SD)
| | - Stefano Milani
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences 'Mario Serio', University of Florence, Florence, Italy (LS, MM, MF, SM); Cancer Prevention and Research Institute (ISPO), Florence, Italy (LV, FC, GC, BM, PM, MZ, GG); im3D S.p.A., Turin, Italy (SD)
| | - Marco Zappa
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences 'Mario Serio', University of Florence, Florence, Italy (LS, MM, MF, SM); Cancer Prevention and Research Institute (ISPO), Florence, Italy (LV, FC, GC, BM, PM, MZ, GG); im3D S.p.A., Turin, Italy (SD)
| | - Grazia Grazzini
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences 'Mario Serio', University of Florence, Florence, Italy (LS, MM, MF, SM); Cancer Prevention and Research Institute (ISPO), Florence, Italy (LV, FC, GC, BM, PM, MZ, GG); im3D S.p.A., Turin, Italy (SD)
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Tinmouth J, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Allison JE. Faecal immunochemical tests versus guaiac faecal occult blood tests: what clinicians and colorectal cancer screening programme organisers need to know. Gut 2015; 64:1327-37. [PMID: 26041750 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 133] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2014] [Accepted: 03/21/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Although colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common cause of cancer-related death, it is fortunately amenable to screening with faecal tests for occult blood and endoscopic tests. Despite the evidence for the efficacy of guaiac-based faecal occult blood tests (gFOBT), they have not been popular with primary care providers in many jurisdictions, in part because of poor sensitivity for advanced colorectal neoplasms (advanced adenomas and CRC). In order to address this issue, high sensitivity gFOBT have been recommended, however, these tests are limited by a reduction in specificity compared with the traditional gFOBT. Where colonoscopy is available, some providers have opted to recommend screening colonoscopy to their patients instead of faecal testing, as they believe it to be a better test. Newer methods for detecting occult human blood in faeces have been developed. These tests, called faecal immunochemical tests (FIT), are immunoassays specific for human haemoglobin. FIT hold considerable promise over the traditional guaiac methods including improved analytical and clinical sensitivity for CRC, better detection of advanced adenomas, and greater screenee participation. In addition, the quantitative FIT are more flexible than gFOBT as a numerical result is reported, allowing customisation of the positivity threshold. When compared with endoscopy, FIT are less sensitive for the detection of advanced colorectal neoplasms when only one time testing is applied to a screening population; however, this is offset by improved participation in a programme of annual or biennial screens and a better safety profile. This review will describe how gFOBT and FIT work and will present the evidence that supports the use of FIT over gFOBT, including the cost-effectiveness of FIT relative to gFOBT. Finally, specific issues related to FIT implementation will be discussed, particularly with respect to organised CRC screening programmes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jill Tinmouth
- Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - James E Allison
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Phalguni A, Seaman H, Routh K, Halloran S, Simpson S. Tests detecting biomarkers for screening of colorectal cancer: What is on the horizon? GMS HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT 2015; 11:Doc01. [PMID: 26131022 PMCID: PMC4466319 DOI: 10.3205/hta000122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Aim: To identify new and emerging screening tests for colorectal cancer (CRC) that involves detection of various biomarkers like blood, DNA and RNA in samples of faeces, tissue or blood. Current practice: Screening for CRC can be done by bowel visualisation techniques and tests that measure biomarkers. The Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) in England uses a guaiac faecal occult blood test. Methods: The strategy was to search available literature, identify developers and contact them for relevant information. Advice from experts was sought on potential utility and likely impact of identified technologies on the BCSP. Results: Ninety-three companies and five research groups were contacted. Sixty-nine relevant tests were identified. Detailed information was available for 48 tests, of these 73% were CE marked and the remainder were considered as emerging. Forty-nine tests use immunochemical methods to detect occult blood in faeces. Eight, four and two tests detect biomarkers in a sample of blood, or exfoliated cells either shed in faeces or collected from rectal mucosa respectively. Six tests were grouped as ‘other tests’. Most of the identified tests are performed manually and give qualitative detection of biomarkers. Conclusion: Variation in test performance and characteristics was observed amongst the 69 identified tests. Automated, quantitative FIT with a variable cut off are the preferred approach in the BSCP. However the units used to report FITs results do not enable comparison across products. Tests detecting biomarkers other than occult blood are more specific to neoplasms but have limited sensitivity due to the heterogeneity of cancer. Research is ongoing to identify an optimal panel of biomarkers, simplifying and automating the test, and reducing the cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angaja Phalguni
- NIHR Horizon Scanning Research & Intelligence Centre, School of Health and Population Sciences, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Helen Seaman
- University of Surrey, NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Southern Programme Hub, United Kingdom
| | - Kristina Routh
- NIHR Horizon Scanning Research & Intelligence Centre, School of Health and Population Sciences, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen Halloran
- University of Surrey, NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Southern Programme Hub, United Kingdom
| | - Sue Simpson
- NIHR Horizon Scanning Research & Intelligence Centre, School of Health and Population Sciences, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Improving uptake of screening for colorectal cancer: a study on invitation strategies and different test kit use. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 27:536-43. [PMID: 25806603 PMCID: PMC4423577 DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000000314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to compare the uptake of mail-delivered tests for colorectal cancer screening. We assessed the effect of an advance notification letter and a reminder letter, and analysed the proportion of inappropriately handled tests. MATERIALS AND METHODS Fifteen thousand randomly selected residents of Latvia aged 50-74 years were allocated to receive one of three different test systems: either a guaiac faecal occult blood test (gFOBT) or one of two laboratory-based immunochemical tests (FIT) - FOB Gold or OC-Sensor. Half of the target population received an advance notification letter; all nonresponders were sent a reminder letter. RESULTS The uptake of screening was 31.2% for the gFOBT, 44.7% for FOB Gold and 47.4% for the OC-Sensor (odds ratio 0.55; 95% confidence interval 0.51-0.60 for gFOBT vs. FOB Gold; odds ratio 0.90; 95% confidence interval 0.83-0.98 for FOB Gold vs. OC-Sensor). The uptake in the gFOBT group was improved by the advance notification letter (7.7%, P<0.0001). 30.9% returned tests were received after the reminder letter. The proportion of tests that could not be analysed because of inadequate handling was 0.9% for gFOBT, 4.4% for FOB Gold and 0.2% for the OC-Sensor (P=0.002 for gFOBT vs. OC-Sensor; P<0.001 for all comparisons vs. FOB Gold). CONCLUSION The use of FIT resulted in higher uptake. Receipt of a reminder letter was critical to participation, but the use of an advance notification letter was important mainly for gFOBT. The proportion of inappropriately handled tests was markedly higher for FOB Gold.
Collapse
|
34
|
Coldman AJ, Phillips N, Brisson J, Flanagan W, Wolfson M, Nadeau C, Fitzgerald N, Miller AB. Using the Cancer Risk Management Model to evaluate colorectal cancer screening options for Canada. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2015; 22:e41-50. [PMID: 25908920 DOI: 10.3747/co.22.2013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several screening methods for colorectal cancer (crc) are available, and some have been shown by randomized trials to be effective. In the present study, we used a well-developed population health simulation model to compare the risks and benefits of a variety of screening scenarios. Tests considered were the fecal occult blood test (fobt), the fecal immunochemical test (fit), flexible sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy. Outcomes considered included years of life gained, crc cases and deaths prevented, and direct health system costs. METHODS A natural history model of crc was implemented and calibrated to specified targets within the framework of the Cancer Risk Management Model (crmm) from the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer. The crmm-crc permits users to enter their own parameter values or to use program-specified base values. For each of 23 screening scenarios, we used the crmm-crc to run 10 million replicate simulations. RESULTS Using base parameter values and some user-specified values in the crmm-crc, and comparing our screening scenarios with no screening, all screening scenarios were found to reduce the incidence of and mortality from crc. The fobt was the least effective test; it was not associated with lower net cost. Colonoscopy screening was the most effective test; it had net costs comparable to those for several other strategies considered, but required more than 3 times the colonoscopy resources needed by other approaches. After colonoscopy, strategies based on the fit were predicted to be the most effective. In sensitivity analyses performed for the fobt and fit screening strategies, fobt parameter values associated with high-sensitivity formulations were associated with a substantial increase in test effectiveness. The fit was more cost-effective at the 50 ng/mL threshold than at the 100 ng/mL threshold. CONCLUSIONS The crmm-crc provides a sophisticated and flexible environment in which to evaluate crc control options. All screening scenarios considered in this study effectively reduced crc mortality, although sensitivity analyses demonstrated some uncertainty in the magnitude of the improvements. Where possible, local data should be used to reduce uncertainty in the parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - N Phillips
- BC Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, BC
| | - J Brisson
- Institute de Santé Publique, Quebec City, QC
| | | | | | | | - N Fitzgerald
- Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, ON
| | - A B Miller
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Abstract
UNLABELLED There is a wide choice of fecal occult blood tests (FOBTs) for colorectal cancer screening. GOAL To highlight the issues applicable when choosing a FOBT, in particular which FOBT is best suited to the range of screening scenarios. Four scenarios characterize the constraints and expectations of screening programs: (1) limited colonoscopy resource with a need to constrain test positivity rate; (2) a priority for maximum colorectal neoplasia detection with little need to constrain colonoscopy workload; (3) an "adequate" endoscopy resource that allows balancing the benefits of detection with the burden of service provision; and (4) a need to maximize participation in screening. Guaiac-based FOBTs (gFOBTs) have significant deficiencies, and fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) for hemoglobin have emerged as better tests. gFOBTs are not sensitive to small bleeds, specificity can be affected by diet or drugs, participant acceptance can be low, laboratory quality control opportunities are limited, and they have a fixed hemoglobin concentration cutoff determining positivity. FITs are analytically more specific, capable of quantitation and hence provide flexibility to adjust cutoff concentration for positivity and the balance between sensitivity and specificity. FITs are clinically more sensitive for cancers and advanced adenomas, and because they are easier to use, acceptance rates are high. CONCLUSIONS FOBT must be chosen carefully to meet the needs of the applicable screening scenario. Quantitative FIT can be adjusted to suit Scenarios 1, 2 and 3, and for each, they are the test of choice. FITs are superior to gFOBT for Scenario 4 and gFOBT is only suitable for Scenario 1.
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, the decade's most promising cancer-related public health development, is evolving. Faecal immunochemical tests (FIT) will be the primary population-based CRC screening biomarker for the next 10-15 years. Will the international community exploit the full potential of FIT and other CRC risk indicators to enable a revolution in the effectiveness of screening?
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen P Halloran
- NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Southern Programme Hub, Surrey Research Park, 20 Priestley Road, Guildford GU2 7YS, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Auge JM, Pellise M, Escudero JM, Hernandez C, Andreu M, Grau J, Buron A, López-Cerón M, Bessa X, Serradesanferm A, Piracés M, Macià F, Guayta R, Filella X, Molina R, Jimenez W, Castells A. Risk stratification for advanced colorectal neoplasia according to fecal hemoglobin concentration in a colorectal cancer screening program. Gastroenterology 2014; 147:628-636.e1. [PMID: 24937264 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2014] [Revised: 06/04/2014] [Accepted: 06/05/2014] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS The latest generation of fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) allows for quantitation of hemoglobin in feces, allowing for selection of optimal cut-off concentrations. We investigated whether individuals with positive results from quantitative FITs, in combination with other factors, could be identified as being at greatest risk for advanced colorectal neoplasia. METHODS In a retrospective study, we analyzed data from a consecutive series of 3109 participants with positive results from FITs (≥20 μg/g of feces) included in the first round of the Barcelona colorectal cancer screening program, from December 2009 through February 2012. All participants underwent colonoscopy and were assigned to groups with any advanced colorectal neoplasia or with nonadvanced colorectal neoplasia (but with another diagnosis or normal examination findings). RESULTS Median fecal hemoglobin concentrations were significantly higher in participants with advanced colorectal neoplasia (105 μg/g; interquartile range, 38-288 μg/g) compared with participants with nonadvanced colorectal neoplasia (47 μg/g; interquartile range, 23-119 μg/g) (P < .001). Positive predictive values for advanced colorectal neoplasia, determined using arbitrary fecal hemoglobin concentrations, differed with sex and age. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified sex (men: odds ratio [OR], 2.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.78-2.41), age (60-69 y: OR, 1.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-1.44), and fecal hemoglobin concentration (>177 μg/g: OR, 3.80; 95% confidence interval, 3.07-4.71) as independent predictive factors for advanced colorectal neoplasia. Combining these factors, we identified 16 risk categories associated with different probabilities of identifying advanced colorectal neoplasia. Risk for advanced colorectal neoplasia increased 11.46-fold among individuals in the highest category compared with the lowest category; positive predictive values ranged from 21.3% to 75.6%. CONCLUSIONS Fecal hemoglobin concentration, in addition to sex and age, in individuals with positive results from FITs can be used to stratify probability for the detection of advanced colorectal neoplasia. These factors should be used to prioritize individuals for colonoscopy examination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josep M Auge
- Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics Department, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Maria Pellise
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clínic, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en el Área temática de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - José M Escudero
- Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics Department, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Cristina Hernandez
- Epidemiology and Evaluation Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Jaume Grau
- Preventive Medicine and Hospital Epidemiology Department, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Andrea Buron
- Epidemiology and Evaluation Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - María López-Cerón
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clínic, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en el Área temática de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Xavier Bessa
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anna Serradesanferm
- Preventive Medicine and Hospital Epidemiology Department, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mercè Piracés
- Epidemiology and Evaluation Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francesc Macià
- Epidemiology and Evaluation Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rafael Guayta
- Council of Colleges of Pharmacists in Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Xavier Filella
- Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics Department, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rafael Molina
- Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics Department, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Wladimiro Jimenez
- Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics Department, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antoni Castells
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clínic, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en el Área temática de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Steele RJ, McDonald PJ, Digby J, Brownlee L, Strachan JA, Libby G, McClements PL, Birrell J, Carey FA, Diament RH, Balsitis M, Fraser CG. Clinical outcomes using a faecal immunochemical test for haemoglobin as a first-line test in a national programme constrained by colonoscopy capacity. United European Gastroenterol J 2014; 1:198-205. [PMID: 24917960 DOI: 10.1177/2050640613489281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2013] [Revised: 03/10/2013] [Accepted: 04/15/2013] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Because of their many advantages, faecal immunochemical tests (FIT) are superseding traditional guaiac-based faecal occult blood tests in bowel screening programmes. METHODS A quantitative FIT was adopted for use in two evaluation National Health Service (NHS) Boards in Scotland using a cut-off faecal haemoglobin concentration chosen to give a positivity rate equivalent to that achieved in the Scottish Bowel Screening Programme. Uptake and clinical outcomes were compared with results obtained contemporaneously in two other similar NHS Boards and before and after the evaluation in the two evaluation NHS Boards. RESULTS During the evaluation, uptake was 58.5%. This was higher than in the same NHS Boards both before and after the evaluation, higher than in the other two NHS Boards and higher than the 53.7% achieved overall in Scotland. The overall positivity rate was higher in men than in women and increased with age in both genders. Positive predictive values for cancer (4.8%), high-risk adenoma (23.3%), all adenoma (38.2%) and all neoplasia (43.0%) in the two test NHS Boards were similar in all groups. CONCLUSIONS In summary, this evaluation of the FIT supports the introduction of FIT as a first-line test, even when colonoscopy capacity is limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Jc Steele
- Department of Surgery, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK
| | | | - Jayne Digby
- Scottish Bowel Screening Centre, NHS Tayside, Dundee, UK
| | - Linda Brownlee
- Scottish Bowel Screening Centre, NHS Tayside, Dundee, UK
| | | | - Gillian Libby
- Scottish Bowel Screening Centre, NHS Tayside, Dundee, UK
| | - Paula L McClements
- Information Services Division, NHS National Services Scotland, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Janice Birrell
- National Services Division, NHS National Services Scotland, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Francis A Carey
- Department of Pathology, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK
| | | | | | - Callum G Fraser
- Centre for Research into Cancer Prevention & Screening, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Hernandez V, Cubiella J, Gonzalez-Mao MC, Iglesias F, Rivera C, Iglesias MB, Cid L, Castro I, Castro LD, Vega P, Hermo JA, Macenlle R, Martínez-Turnes A, Martínez-Ares D, Estevez P, Cid E, Vidal MC, López-Martínez A, Hijona E, Herreros-Villanueva M, Bujanda L, investigators JIRPTCOLONPREVS. Fecal immunochemical test accuracy in average-risk colorectal cancer screening. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20:1038-1047. [PMID: 24574776 PMCID: PMC3921527 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i4.1038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2013] [Revised: 10/18/2013] [Accepted: 11/13/2013] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM: To assess the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) accuracy for colorectal cancer (CRC) and advanced neoplasia (AN) detection in CRC screening.
METHODS: We performed a multicentric, prospective, double blind study of diagnostic tests on asymptomatic average-risk individuals submitted to screening colonoscopy. Two stool samples were collected and the fecal hemoglobin concentration was determined in the first sample (FIT1) and the highest level of both samples (FITmax) using the OC-sensor™. Areas under the curve (AUC) for CRC and AN were calculated. The best FIT1 and FITmax cut-off values for CRC were determined. At this threshold, number needed to scope (NNS) to detect a CRC and an AN and the cost per lesion detected were calculated.
RESULTS: About 779 individuals were included. An AN was found in 97 (12.5%) individuals: a CRC in 5 (0.6%) and an advanced adenoma (≥ 10 mm, villous histology or high grade dysplasia) in 92 (11.9%) subjects. For CRC diagnosis, FIT1 AUC was 0.96 (95%CI: 0.95-0.98) and FITmax AUC was 0.95 (95%CI: 0.93-0.97). For AN, FIT1 and FITmax AUC were similar (0.72, 95%CI: 0.66-0.78 vs 0.73, 95%CI: 0.68-0.79, respectively, P = 0.34). Depending on the number of determinations and the positivity threshold cut-off used sensitivity for AN detection ranged between 28% and 42% and specificity between 91% and 97%. At the best cut-off point for CRC detection (115 ng/mL), the NNS to detect a CRC were 10.2 and 15.8; and the cost per CRC was 1814€ and 2985€ on FIT1 and FITmax strategies respectively. At this threshold the sensitivity, NNS and cost per AN detected were 30%, 1.76, and 306€, in FIT1 strategy, and 36%, 2.26€ and 426€, in FITmax strategy, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Performing two tests does not improve diagnostic accuracy, but increases cost and NNS to detect a lesion.
Collapse
|
40
|
Ventura L, Mantellini P, Grazzini G, Castiglione G, Buzzoni C, Rubeca T, Sacchettini C, Paci E, Zappa M. The impact of immunochemical faecal occult blood testing on colorectal cancer incidence. Dig Liver Dis 2014; 46:82-6. [PMID: 24011791 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2013.07.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2013] [Revised: 06/26/2013] [Accepted: 07/24/2013] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The efficacy of colorectal cancer screening based on faecal immunochemical test, in terms of reduction of colorectal cancer incidence, is under debate. In the district of Florence, an organized screening programme based on faecal immunochemical test has been running since the early 1990s. The aim of this study was to compare the risk of developing colorectal cancer for subjects undergoing faecal immunochemical test with those who did not undergo the test in the same period. METHODS Two cohorts were analyzed: subjects who underwent an initial faecal immunochemical test between 1993 and 1999 ("attenders"), and unscreened residents in the same municipalities invited to perform the faecal immunochemical test in the same period ("non-attenders"). Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis were performed to evaluate the risk of developing colorectal cancer. RESULTS The attenders' and non-attenders' cohorts included 6961 and 26,285 subjects, respectively. Cox analysis showed a reduction in colorectal cancer incidence of 22% in the attenders' compared to the non-attenders' cohort (hazard ratio = 0.78, 95% Confidence Interval: 0.65-0.93). CONCLUSION Our results support the hypothesis that screening based on a single faecal immunochemical test every 2 years produces a significant decrease in colorectal cancer incidence after an average follow-up observation period of 11 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Tiziana Rubeca
- Cancer Prevention and Research Institute, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Eugenio Paci
- Cancer Prevention and Research Institute, Florence, Italy
| | - Marco Zappa
- Cancer Prevention and Research Institute, Florence, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Uptake and positive predictive value of fecal occult blood tests: A randomized controlled trial. Prev Med 2013; 57:671-8. [PMID: 24029556 PMCID: PMC3856243 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.08.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2013] [Revised: 08/20/2013] [Accepted: 08/31/2013] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to compare the uptake of three mailed high-sensitivity fecal occult blood tests (FOBTs). METHODS We conducted a parallel 3-arm randomized controlled trial in an integrated healthcare delivery system in Washington State. From January 2010 through February 2011, automated data were used to identify potentially eligible patients aged 50-74 due for colorectal cancer screening. Participants were mailed one of three FOBT kits (1-sample OC-Auto® fecal immunochemical test [FIT], 2-sample InSure® FIT, or 3-sample guaiac Hemoccult SENSA®), instructions, and a postage-paid return envelope. We performed a modified intent-to-treat analysis with return of any FOBT within 6 months of randomization as the primary outcome. RESULTS Of the 9922 people invited, 2873 returned surveys, 2263 were randomized, and 2234 were analyzed. FOBTs were returned by 1431 participants. At 6 months post-randomization, the proportions screened by any FOBT were 0.69 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66-0.72) for the OC-Auto arm, 0.64 (95% CI: 0.61-0.68) for the InSure arm, and 0.61 (95% CI: 0.58-0.65) for the Hemoccult SENSA arm (P<0.001 for any difference). Pairwise comparisons showed significant differences between the OC-Auto group and each of the other groups after correction for multiple comparisons. CONCLUSION Uptake of mailed FOBT kits varies by kit type.
Collapse
|
42
|
Cha JM, Lee JI, Joo KR, Shin HP, Jeun JW, Lim JU. Use of a low cut-off value for the fecal immunochemical test enables better detection of proximal neoplasia. Dig Dis Sci 2013; 58:3256-62. [PMID: 23912251 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-013-2819-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2013] [Accepted: 07/19/2013] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The advantage of the quantitative fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is the flexibility to set the positivity threshold. However, the diagnostic success of the FIT has not been compared for standard and low cut-off thresholds. AIMS The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic success of FIT for standard and low cut-off thresholds. METHODS In 2009 and 2010 a standard cut-off threshold (20 μg Hb/g feces) was used as positivity criterion for the FIT; in 2012 a low cut-off (10 μg Hb/g feces) was used. Diagnostic success was compared between the two groups. RESULTS Of the total of 14,289 participants, 195 (1.4 %) had positive FIT results. Positivity of the FIT was significantly higher in the low cut-off group than in the standard cut-off group (1.8 vs. 1.0 %, p = 0.000). Although detection of advanced neoplasia lesions was comparable, proximal neoplasia was more frequently detected in the low cut-off group (33.3 vs. 20.9 %, p = 0.016). With the low cut-off threshold, 39 (0.7 %) participants were also classified as having positive results, and 18 (46.2 %) of these had colorectal neoplasias. The number of positive results from the FIT was increased by 54.9 %, and detection of advanced neoplasia was increased by 60 % with the low cut-off threshold compared with the standard cut-off. CONCLUSIONS A low cut-off threshold for the FIT resulted in better detection of proximal neoplasia in population-based screening. These results indicate the cut-off threshold for positive FIT should be properly chosen and adjusted in colorectal cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae Myung Cha
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, 149 Sangil-dong, Gangdong-gu, Seoul, 134-727, South Korea,
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Raginel T, Puvinel J, Ferrand O, Bouvier V, Levillain R, Ruiz A, Lantieri O, Launoy G, Guittet L. A population-based comparison of immunochemical fecal occult blood tests for colorectal cancer screening. Gastroenterology 2013; 144:918-25. [PMID: 23376426 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.01.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2012] [Revised: 01/17/2013] [Accepted: 01/22/2013] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Quantitative fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) identify individuals with colorectal cancer with greater levels of accuracy than guaiac tests. We compared the performances of 2 FITs in a population undergoing screening for colorectal cancer. METHODS We collected fecal samples from 19,797 individuals in France (age, 50-74 y) who participated in a colorectal cancer screening program, from June 2009 through May 2011. Samples were analyzed using the Magstream (Fujirebio Inc, Tokyo, Japan) and OC Sensor (Eiken Chemical Co, Tokyo, Japan) (2 samples each) FITs, as well as the Hemoccult II guaiac test (SKD, Villepinte, France) (3 samples each). Colonoscopies were performed for patients with positive results from all 3 tests. The cut-off values for levels of hemoglobin in buffer and stools were 55 ng/mL and 180 μg/g for the Magstream and 150 ng/mL and 30 μg/g for the OC Sensor, respectively. Results from the FITs were compared with those from the guaiac test for cut-off values for stool samples, positivity rates, and the receiver operating characteristic curve values. The numbers needed to screen and the numbers needed to scope to detect an advanced neoplasia (cancer, adenoma ≥10 mm, or high-grade dysplasia) were calculated. RESULTS A positive test result was found in 1224 participants (6.2%); 1075 (87.8%) underwent a colonoscopy examination. Of these, 334 were found to have advanced neoplasia. Considering the cut-off values associated with the positivity rate of Hemoccult II (1.6%), the numbers needed to screen were 239 for Hemoccult II, 166 for a 1-sample Magstream FIT, and 129 for a 1-sample OC Sensor FIT; the numbers needed to scope were 3.3, 2.3, and 1.8, respectively. For the same false-positive rate as Hemoccult II (0.98%), the true-positive rates for Magstream and OC Sensor FITs were 0.65% and 0.90% respectively, compared with 0.42% for Hemoccult II. The OC Sensor FIT had a greater area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value than the Magstream FIT. CONCLUSIONS Based on results from a large, population-based study, the OC Sensor FIT identifies patients with colorectal cancer with greater accuracy than the Magstream FIT. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT01251666.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thibaut Raginel
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Caen, Caen, France; Normandie University, Caen, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Garborg K, Holme Ø, Løberg M, Kalager M, Adami HO, Bretthauer M. Current status of screening for colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 2013; 24:1963-72. [PMID: 23619033 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer morbidity and mortality. A well-defined precursor lesion (adenoma) and a long preclinical course make CRC a candidate for screening. This paper reviews the current evidence for the most important tests that are widely used or under development for population-based screening. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this narrative review, we scrutinized all papers we have been aware of, and carried out searches in PubMed and Cochrane library for relevant literature. RESULTS Two screening methods have been shown to reduce CRC mortality in randomised trials: repetitive faecal occult blood testing (FOBT) reduces CRC mortality by 16%; once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) by 28%. FS screening also reduces CRC incidence (by 18%), FOBT does not. Colonoscopy screening has a potentially larger effect on CRC incidence and mortality, but randomised trials are lacking. New screening methods are on the horizon but need to be tested in large clinical trials before implementation in population screening. CONCLUSIONS FS screening reduces CRC incidence and CRC mortality by removal of adenomas; FOBT reduces CRC mortality by early detection of cancer. Several other tests are available, but none has been evaluated in randomised trials. Screening strategies differ considerably across countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Garborg
- Department of Medicine, Sørlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Diagnostic yield of a one sample immunochemical test at different cut-off values in an organised screening programme for colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 2013; 49:2727-33. [PMID: 23601670 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.03.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2013] [Revised: 03/15/2013] [Accepted: 03/16/2013] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Quantitative immunochemical faecal occult blood tests have become the recommended tests for colorectal cancer screening. The aim of this study was to complete our knowledge on the performance of one of the quantitative immunochemical tests available, FOB-Gold, and to propose a possible strategy for an organised screening programme. PATIENTS AND METHODS Within the French organised screening programme, 23,231 average-risk individuals, aged 50-74 performed both a 3-day Hemoccult test and a 1-day FOB-Gold test. Performances of the immunochemical test were evaluated at different cut-off levels. RESULTS The positivity rate for the Hemoccult was 2.1% and for the FOB-Gold varied between 4.6% (cut-off value of 100 ng/mL, the lowest studied cut-off) and 2.1% (cut-off value of 352 ng/mL). The number of colonoscopies decreased with increasing cut-off values by 21.5% (150 ng/mL), 35.4% (200 ng/mL) and 53.3% (352 ng/mL). The corresponding miss rate for CRC was respectively 6.4%, 11.1% and 22.2%, and for advanced adenoma respectively 16.3%, 29.2% and 43.6%. Compared with the reference cut-off for the FOB-Gold (100 ng/mL) the miss rate for Hemoccult was 53% for CRC and 77% for advanced adenoma. CONCLUSION The study suggests that in countries with colonoscopy facilities compatible with a screening test positivity rate of up to 5%, use of a 1-day test with a cut-off value between 100 and 150 ng/mL could be the recommended strategy. Further increasing the cut-off value up to the same positivity rate as Hemoccult could be used in areas with limited access to colonoscopy.
Collapse
|
46
|
Kovarova JT, Zavoral M, Zima T, Zak A, Kocna P, Kohout P, Granatova J, Vanickova Z, Vranova J, Suchanek S, Benes Z, Celko MA, Povysil C. Improvements in colorectal cancer screening programmes - quantitative immunochemical faecal occult blood testing - how to set the cut-off for a particular population. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub 2012; 156:143-50. [PMID: 22837135 DOI: 10.5507/bp.2012.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of the study was to determine the optimum cut-off value of the quantitative immunochemical test (q-FIT) OC-Sensor for colorectal cancer and advanced adenomatous polyps in a particular population. METHODS 815 patients were referred for colonoscopy and were offered two q-FIT examinations at two different colonoscopy centers. The patients were classified according to the colonoscopic findings. Test sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were statistically evaluated using one test and two tests at the levels of 50, 75, 100, 125, and 150 ng/mL of faecal hemoglobin in those patients with advanced polyps and colorectal cancer. The optimum cut-off test level for clinically significant neoplasia was determined using one test. RESULTS The optimum cut-off value of q-FIT OC-Sensor for the detection of clinically significant neoplasia in our particular population was determined as 75 ng/mL using one test. This value provides an optimum proportion of 73% sensitivity (±95% CI 60.3% - 83.4%) and 90% specificity (±95% CI 86.8% - 92.8%), PPV and NPV were determined as 54.76% and 95.43% respectively. CONCLUSIONS The first step in the implementation of q-FIT test in the screening program in our country is to determine the optimum cut-off level for a population, and to estimate the number of tests performed with respect to the optimum cost effectiveness and economical climate. Using one test, the optimum level of q-FIT OC-Sensor® in the Czech Republic was determined as 75 ng/mL. This study could serve as a model for further studies in other countries, where screening does not yet exist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaroslava Tereza Kovarova
- 4th Department of Internal Medicine, General Teaching Hospital, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague, Czech Republic.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Faivre J, Dancourt V, Lejeune C. Screening for colorectal cancer with immunochemical faecal occult blood tests. Dig Liver Dis 2012; 44:967-73. [PMID: 22898146 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2012.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2012] [Accepted: 07/05/2012] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Population-based studies have shown that guaiac faecal occult blood testing followed by colonoscopy in case of positivity can reduce colorectal cancer mortality. However these tests have been criticised for their fairly low sensitivity. For this reason attention has been given to alternative tests. The aim of this paper is to review the evidence for screening for colorectal cancer using qualitative immunochemical faecal occult blood tests. For the complete range of tested cut-off values, immunochemical faecal occult blood tests lead to higher diagnostic yield, improved sensitivity and greater participation. The optimal number of samples and the optimal cut-off value has to suit local resources and the acceptability of missed cancers. All economic evaluations, despite some differences between studies, add further arguments to support the opinion that the immunochemical faecal occult blood test is currently the most cost-effective screening test for average-risk populations. These economic evaluations provide strong arguments in favour of the 1-sample strategy. With decreasing the cut-off value similar performances can be achieved with one-compared to two day sampling. Too few data are currently available to accurately compare existing qualitative tests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean Faivre
- Burgundy Digestive Cancer Registry, INSERM U866, University of Burgundy, University Hospital of Dijon, Dijon Cedex, France.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Colorectal cancer screening: why immunochemical faecal occult blood test performs as well with either one or two samples. Dig Liver Dis 2012; 44:694-9. [PMID: 22525156 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2012.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2011] [Revised: 02/29/2012] [Accepted: 03/04/2012] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immunochemical faecal occult blood tests perform as well with either one or two samples, and better than guaiac tests with 6 samples. AIMS Clarifying relationship between tests' performance, bleeding pattern and observation level. METHODS The data of 32,225 average-risk subjects who performed both Hemoccult II (guaiac) and Magstream (immunochemical) tests were re-analysed by varying the cutoff and number of samples of Magstream. RESULTS The identical performances obtained using one or two samples of Magstream (lower cutoff for one sample) at the population level were explained by opposite patterns of bleeding according to the presence of advanced neoplasias. They translated into discrepancy at the individual level: for example a 60% increase in sensitivity and 20% in specificity observed with one (39ng Hb/ml cutoff) or two samples (63ng Hb/ml cutoff) Magstream compared with Hemoccult II meant that 28.5% of the subjects testing positive with one sample (18.0% in subjects with advanced neoplasias) would have been considered negative by using two samples of Magstream at a higher cutoff (and reciprocal). CONCLUSION The identical performance of immunochemical tests using one or two samples (different cutoff), explained by opposite pattern of bleeding according to advanced neoplasias is true only at the population level, the appropriate level for mass screening.
Collapse
|
49
|
Faivre J, Dancourt V, Manfredi S, Denis B, Durand G, Gendre I, Bidan JM, Jard C, Levillain R, Jung S, Viguier J, Dorval E. Positivity rates and performances of immunochemical faecal occult blood tests at different cut-off levels within a colorectal cancer screening programme. Dig Liver Dis 2012; 44:700-4. [PMID: 22542582 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2012.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2011] [Revised: 03/02/2012] [Accepted: 03/08/2012] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immunochemical faecal occult blood tests have greater sensitivity for colorectal cancer screening than guaiac-based tests; however the number of positive tests required is still under discussion. METHODS A direct comparison of Hemoccult II with two immunochemical quantitative tests (OC-Sensor and FOB-Gold) using a 2-sample strategy was performed in over 30,000 patients undergoing colorectal cancer screening in France. RESULTS Positivity ratio between immunochemical tests and Hemoccult II varied between 2.2 (OC-Sensor) and 2.4 (FOB-Gold) for the lowest cut-off value and 1.5-1.4 for the highest cut-off value. The positive predictive value for colorectal cancer was similar for immunochemical tests and Hemoccult II, and significantly higher for immunochemical tests for advanced adenomas. The detection rate of both colorectal cancer and advanced adenomas was higher with immunochemical tests than with Hemoccult II. With the 2-sample strategy and the lowest cut-off value the detection rate of colorectal cancer almost doubled and for advanced adenomas quadrupled. CONCLUSION For colorectal cancer screening with immunochemical faecal occult blood tests, an acceptable strategy would be 2-day sampling with at least one positive test at a cut-off between 150 and 200 ng/mL (OC-Sensor) and 176 and 234 ng/mL (FOB-Gold). Data on the ease of test interpretation and cost-effectiveness now necessary to make definitive choices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean Faivre
- Burgundy Digestive Cancer Registry, INSERM U866, University of Burgundy, University Hospital Dijon, Dijon Cedex, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Lee BI, Hong SP, Kim SE, Kim SH, Kim HS, Hong SN, Yang DH, Shin SJ, Lee SH, Kim YH, Park DI, Kim HJ, Yang SK, Kim HJ, Jeon HJ. [Korean guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and polyp detection]. THE KOREAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY 2012; 59:65-84. [PMID: 22387833 DOI: 10.4166/kjg.2012.59.2.65] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is the second most common cancer in males and the fourth most common in females in Korea. Since the most of colorectal cancer occur through the prolonged transformation of adenomas into carcinomas, early detection and removal of colorectal adenomas are one of the most effective methods to prevent colorectal cancer. Considering the increasing incidence of colorectal cancer and polyps in Korea, it is very important to establish Korean guideline for colorectal cancer screening and polyp detection. Korean Multi-Society Take Force developed the guidelines with evidence-based methods. Parts of the statements drawn by systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Herein we discussed the epidemiology of colorectal cancers and adenomas in Korea, optimal screening methods for colorectal cancer, and detection for adenomas including fecal occult blood tests, radiologic tests, and endoscopic examinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo In Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|