Reversal of MDR1-associated resistance to topotecan by PAK-200S, a new dihydropyridine analogue, in human cancer cell lines

Cardioprotective Effect against Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury of PAK-200, a Dihydropyridine Analog with an Inhibitory Effect on Cl- but Not Ca2+ Current

We examined the effects of a dihydropyridine analog, PAK-200, on guinea pig myocardium during experimental ischemia and reperfusion. In isolated ventricular cardiomyocytes, PAK-200 (1 μM) had no effect on the basal peak inward and steady-state currents but inhibited the isoprenaline-induced time-independent Cl- current. In the right atria, PAK-200 had no effect on the beating rate and the chronotropic response to isoprenaline. In an ischemia-reperfusion model with coronary-perfused right ventricular tissue, a decrease in contractile force and a rise in tension were observed during a period of 30-min no-flow ischemia. Upon reperfusion, contractile force returned to less than 50% of preischemic values. PAK-200 had no effect on the decline in contractile force during the no-flow ischemia but reduced the rise in resting tension. PAK-200 significantly improved the recovery of contractile force after reperfusion to about 70% of the preischemic value. PAK-200 was also shown to attenuate the decrease in tissue ATP during ischemia. Treatment of ventricular myocytes with an ischemia-mimetic solution resulted in depolarization of the mitochondrial membrane potential and an increase in cytoplasmic and mitochondrial Ca2+ concentrations. PAK-200 significantly delayed these changes. Thus, PAK-200 inhibits the cAMP-activated chloride current in cardiac muscle and may have protective effects against ischemia-reperfusion injury through novel mechanisms.

Effect of ALDH1A1 Gene Knockout on Drug Resistance in Paclitaxel and Topotecan Resistant Human Ovarian Cancer Cell Lines in 2D and 3D Model

Ovarian cancer is the most common cause of gynecological cancer death. Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs) characterized by drug transporters and extracellular matrix (ECM) molecules expression are responsible for drug resistance development. The goal of our study was to examine the role of aldehyde dehydrogenase 1A1 (ALDH1A1) expression in paclitaxel (PAC) and topotecan (TOP) resistant ovarian cancer cell lines. In both cell lines, we knocked out the ALDH1A1 gene using the CRISPR/Cas9 technique. Additionally, we derived an ALDH1A1 positive TOP-resistant cell line with ALDH1A1 expression in all cells via clonal selection. The effect of ALDH1A1 gene knockout or clonal selection on the expression of ALDH1A1, drug transporters (P-gp and BCRP), and ECM (COL3A1) was determined by Q-PCR, Western blot and immunofluorescence. Using MTT assay, we compared drug resistance in two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) cell culture conditions. We did not observe any effect of ALDH1A1 gene knockout on MDR1/P-gp expression and drug resistance in the PAC-resistant cell line. The knockout of ALDH1A1 in the TOP-resistant cell line resulted in a moderate decrease of BCRP and COL3A1 expression and weakened TOP resistance. The clonal selection of ALDH1A1 cells resulted in very strong downregulation of BCPR and COL3A1 expression and overexpression of MDR1/P-gp. This finally resulted in decreased resistance to TOP but increased resistance to PAC. All spheroids were more resistant than cells growing as monolayers, but the resistance mechanism differs. The spheroids' resistance may result from the presence of cell zones with different proliferation paces, the density of the spheroid, ECM expression, and drug capacity to diffuse into the spheroid.

Analysis of MDR genes expression and cross-resistance in eight drug resistant ovarian cancer cell lines

Background

Multiple drug resistance (MDR) of cancer cells is the main reason of intrinsic or acquired insensitivity to chemotherapy in many cancers. In this study we used ovarian cancer model of acquired drug resistance to study development of MDR.

We have developed eight drug resistant cell lines from A2780 ovarian cancer cell line: two cell lines resistant to each drug commonly used in ovarian cancer chemotherapy: cisplatin (CIS), paclitaxel (PAC), doxorubicin (DOX) and topotecan (TOP). A chemosensitivity assay - MTT was performed to assess drug cross-resistance. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction and immunofluorescence were also performed to determine mRNA and protein expression of genes/proteins involved in drug resistance (P-gp, BCRP, MRP1, MRP2, MVP). Flow cytometry was used to determine the activity of drug transporters.

Results

We could observe cross-resistance between PAC- and DOX-resistant cell lines. Additionally, both PAC-resistant cell lines were cross-resistant to TOP and both TOP-resistant cell lines were cross-resistant to DOX. We observed two different mechanisms of resistance to TOP related to P-gp and BCRP expression and activity. P-gp and BCRP were also involved in DOX resistance. Expression of MRP2 was increased in CIS-resistant cell lines and increased MVP expression was observed in CIS-, PAC- and TOP-, but not in DOX-resistant cell lines.

Conclusions

Effectiveness of TOP and DOX in second line of chemotherapy in ovarian cancer can be limited because of their cross-resistance to PAC. Moreover, cross-resistance of PAC-resistant cell line to CIS suggests that such interaction between those drugs might also be probable in clinic.

Combination treatment with trabectedin and irinotecan or topotecan has synergistic effects against ovarian clear cell carcinoma cells

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to investigate the chemotherapeutic agents that produce the strongest synergistic effects when combined with trabectedin against ovarian clear cell carcinoma (CCC), which is regarded as an aggressive chemoresistant histological subtype.

METHODS

Using 4 human CCC cell lines (RMG1, RMG2, KOC7C, and HAC2), the cytotoxicities of trabectedin, SN-38, topotecan, doxorubicin, cisplatin, and paclitaxel as single agents were first assessed using the MTS assay. Then, the cytotoxicities of combination treatments involving trabectedin and 1 of the other 4 agents were evaluated by isobologram analysis to examine whether these combinations displayed synergistic, additive, or antagonistic effects. The antitumor activities of the combination treatments were also examined using cisplatin-resistant and paclitaxel-resistant CCC sublines, which were derived from the parental CCC cells by continuously exposing them to cisplatin or paclitaxel. Finally, we determined the effect of everolimus on the antitumor efficacy of trabectedin-based combination chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Concurrent exposure to trabectedin and SN-38 or topotecan resulted in synergistic interactions in all 4 CCC cell lines. Among the tested combinations, trabectedin plus SN-38 was the most effective cytotoxic regimen. The combination of trabectedin plus SN-38 also had strong synergistic effects on both the cisplatin-resistant and paclitaxel-resistant CCC cell lines. Treatment with everolimus significantly enhanced the antitumor activity of trabectedin plus SN-38 or topotecan.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination treatment with trabectedin and SN-38 displays the greatest cytotoxic effect against ovarian CCC. Our in vitro study provides the rationale for future clinical trials of trabectedin plus irinotecan with or without everolimus in patients with ovarian CCC in both the front-line chemotherapy setting and as a second-line treatment of recurrent CCC that had previously been treated with cisplatin or paclitaxel.

Diethyl 4-(biphenyl-4-yl)-2,6-dimethyl-1,4-di-hydro-pyridine-3,5-di-carboxyl-ate

The title compound, C25H27NO4, has a flattened di-hydro-pyridine ring. The benzene and phenyl rings are synclinal to one another, forming a dihedral angle of 49.82 (8)°; the axis of the biphenyl rings makes an 81.05 (9)° angle to the plane of the di-hydro-pyridine ring. In the crystal, N-H⋯O hydrogen bonds link the mol-ecules into chain motifs running along the a-axis direction. The chains are cross-linked by C-H⋯O inter-actions, forming sheet motifs running slightly off the (110) plane, together with an intermolecular interaction between head-to tail biphenyl groups, thus making the whole crystal packing a three-dimensional network. Intra-molecular C-H⋯O hydrogen bonds are also observed.

MDR gene expression analysis of six drug-resistant ovarian cancer cell lines

Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death among gynaecological malignancies. Multiple drug resistance makes cancer cells insensitive to chemotherapy. In this study, we developed six primary ovarian cancer cell lines (W1MR, W1CR, W1DR, W1VR, W1TR, and W1PR) resistant to drugs such as methotrexate, cisplatin, doxorubicin, vincristine, topotecan, and paclitaxel. A chemosensitivity assay MTT test was performed to assess drug cross-resistance. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction and Western blot were also performed to determine mRNA and protein expression of genes involved in chemoresistance. We observed high cross-resistance to doxorubicin, vincristine, and paclitaxel in the cell lines resistant to these agents. We also found a significant correlation between resistance to these drugs and increased expression of P-gp. Two different mechanisms of topotecan resistance were observed in the W1TR and W1PR cell lines. We did not observe any correlation between MRP2 transcript and protein levels. Cell lines resistant to agents used in ovarian cancer treatment remained sensitive to methotrexate. The main mechanisms of drug resistance were due to P-gp expression in the doxorubicin, vincristine, and paclitaxel resistant cell lines and BCRP expression in the topotecan resistant cell line.

Sequential administration of irinotecan and cytarabine in the treatment of relapsed and refractory acute myeloid leukemia

PURPOSE

Based on reported synergy of the topoisomerase-I (topo-I) inhibitor irinotecan with antimetabolites, irinotecan and cytarabine (Ara-C) were administered sequentially to patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) refractory to or relapsed following high-dose Ara-C and anthracycline therapy. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies were performed with the first irinotecan dose.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

In vitro synergy of irinotecan followed by Ara-C was confirmed in a human AML cell line as a basis for the clinical trial. Irinotecan was administered daily for 5 days, with Ara-C 1 g/m2 12 h after each irinotecan dose. Irinotecan was initiated at 5 mg/m2, and the dose was escalated by 5 mg/m2 increments in cohorts of three patients and in individual patients. Pre-treatment samples were studied for topo-I activity and serial samples after the first irinotecan dose were analyzed for pharmacokinetics and for pharmacodynamic effects, including DNA damage and DNA synthesis rate.

RESULTS

The irinotecan dose reached 15 mg/m2 in three-patient cohorts without reaching the maximum tolerated dose, and reached 30 mg/m2 in individual patients. The AUC and Cmax of both irinotecan and its active metabolite SN38 increased linearly in proportion to dose, and the mean half-lives of irinotecan conversion to SN38 and SN38 elimination were 6.2 h (CV 171%) and 7.2 h (CV 48%). Irinotecan rapidly induced DNA damage, and DNA synthesis inhibition varied among patients and treatment cycles. All courses resulted in rapid cytoreduction, and two patients achieved complete remission. Topo-I activity did not predict response.

CONCLUSION

Irinotecan can be safely administered with Ara-C. This combination is active in refractory AML and warrants further study.

The epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib sensitizes colon cancer cells to irinotecan

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) overactivity plays a significant role in colon cancer biology and has been associated with poor clinical prognosis. Early clinical trials reported efficacy of receptor-targeted compounds, including modulation of clinical irinotecan resistance. We investigated the effects of the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib on cellular determinants of irinotecan resistance in human colon cancer cells. At non-cytotoxic concentrations, gefitinib sensitized colon cancer cells to SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan. Gefitinib increased the SN-38-mediated induction of protein-linked DNA single-strand breaks in a dose-dependent manner, with no alteration of topoisomerase (Topo) I protein expression or enzymatic activity. Whereas Topo IIbeta protein expression was not affected by gefitinib, significant time- and concentration-dependent downregulation of Topo IIalpha protein and inhibition of its enzymatic function were observed, corresponding to a G1 phase cell cycle arrest. Gefitinib significantly inhibited EGFR-associated signaling molecules, including phospho-mitogen-activated protein kinase or protein kinase C, which may account for decreases in proliferation or topoisomerase activity, respectively. Although a dose-dependent decrease of the BCRP/MXR/ABCP half-transporter was observed under gefitinib, cellular pharmacokinetics revealed no significant differences in accumulation or retention of the active SN-38 lactone using reverse-phase HPLC analysis. This study delineates mechanisms that may contribute to the synergism observed between irinotecan and EGFR inhibitors.

BCRP transports dipyridamole and is inhibited by calcium channel blockers

PURPOSE

We investigated whether dipyridamole and various calcium channel blockers are inhibitors and/or substrates of breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP).

METHODS

The effect of dipyridamole and the calcium channel blockers on mitoxantrone efflux by BCRP-overexpressing human embryonic kidney (HEK) cells was determined by flow cytometry. The ability of some of these compounds to reverse BCRP-mediated mitoxantrone resistance was measured by cytotoxicity assays. Transport studies were performed using radiolabeled compounds.

RESULTS

Dipyridamole, nicardipine, nitrendipine, and nimodipine effectively inhibited BCRP-mediated mitoxantrone efflux; however, bepridil, diltiazem, and verapamil had no significant effect. Nifedipine is a much weaker BCRP inhibitor compared with other dihydropyridines tested. Nicardipine and dipyridamole were the most potent BCRP inhibitors among the compounds tested with IC50 values of 4.8 +/- 1.3 and 6.4 +/- 0.9 microM, respectively. Nicardipine and dipyridamole also effectively reversed BCRP-mediated mitoxantrone resistance in HEK cells. [3H]Nitrendipine was found not to be transported by BCRP. However, the transport of [3H]dipyridamole by BCRP was observed in both HEK and Madin-Darby canine kidney cells stably expressing the transporter, and this transport was completely abolished by fumitremorgin C, a known BCRP inhibitor.

CONCLUSIONS

Dipyridamole and several dihydropyridines are effective BCRP inhibitors, but bepridil, diltiazem, and verapamil are not. We also identified a new BCRP substrate, dipyridamole.

ABC transporters as multidrug resistance mechanisms and the development of chemosensitizers for their reversal

One of the major problems related with anticancer chemotherapy is resistance against anticancer drugs. The ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters are a family of transporter proteins that are responsible for drug resistance and a low bioavailability of drugs by pumping a variety of drugs out cells at the expense of ATP hydrolysis. One strategy for reversal of the resistance of tumor cells expressing ABC transporters is combined use of anticancer drugs with chemosensitizers. In this review, the physiological functions and structures of ABC transporters, and the development of chemosensitizers are described focusing on well-known proteins including P-glycoprotein, multidrug resistance associated protein, and breast cancer resistance protein.

Membrane transport of camptothecin: facilitation by human P-glycoprotein (ABCB1) and multidrug resistance protein 2 (ABCC2)

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the present study was to continue the investigation of the membrane transport mechanisms of 20-(S)-camptothecin (CPT) in order to understand the possible role of membrane transporters on its oral bioavailability and disposition.

METHODS

The intestinal transport kinetics of CPT were characterized using Caco-2 cells, MDCKII wild-type cells and MDCKII cells transfected with human P-glycoprotein (PGP) (ABCB1) or human multidrug resistance protein 2 (MRP2) (ABCC2). The effects of drug concentration, inhibitors and temperature on CPT directional permeability were determined.

RESULTS

The absorptive (apical to basolateral) and secretory (basolateral to apical) permeabilities of CPT were found to be saturable. Reduced secretory CPT permeabilities with decreasing temperatures suggests the involvement of an active, transporter-mediated secretory pathway. In the presence of etoposide, the CPT secretory permeability decreased 25.6%. However, inhibition was greater in the presence of PGP and of the breast cancer resistant protein inhibitor, GF120918 (52.5%). The involvement of additional secretory transporters was suggested since the basolateral to apical permeability of CPT was not further reduced in the presence of increasing concentrations of GF120918. To investigate the involvement of specific apically-located secretory membrane transporters, CPT transport studies were conducted using MDCKII/PGP cells and MDCKII/MRP2 cells. CPT carrier-mediated permeability was approximately twofold greater in MDCKII/PGP cells and MDCKII/MRP2 cells than in MDCKII/wild-type cells, while the apparent Km values were comparable in all three cell lines. The efflux ratio of CPT in MDCKII/PGP in the presence of 0.2 microM GF120918 was not completely reversed (3.36 to 1.49). However, the decrease in the efflux ratio of CPT in MDCKII/MRP2 cells (2.31 to 1.03) suggests that CPT efflux was completely inhibited by MK571, a potent inhibitor of the Multidrug Resistance Protein transporter family.

CONCLUSIONS

The current results provide evidence that PGP and MRP2 mediate the secretory transport of CPT in vitro. However, the involvement of other transporters cannot be ruled out based on these studies. Since these transporters are expressed in the intestine, liver and kidney variations in their expression levels and/or regulation may be responsible for the erratic oral absorption and biliary excretion of CPT observed in human subjects.

Determination of chemotherapeutic activity in vivo by luminescent imaging of luciferase-transfected human tumors

Human DU-145 prostate and MCF-7 breast tumor cell lines were stably transfected with plasmid pcDNA3.1-Luc expressing firefly luciferase. Studies were performed with the transfected cell lines to evaluate luminescent imaging for measuring the efficacy of anti-cancer agents. In vitro experiments demonstrated a dose response of both cell lines to topotecan (Hycamtin) with an IC50 of 0.013 microM for MCF-7 Luc cells and 0.002 microM for DU-145 Luc cells. In vivo imaging experiments were performed using athymic nude mice inoculated i.p. with 5 x 10(6) MCF-7 cells or s.c. with 5 x 10(6) DU-145 cells and then treated with topotecan at 2.5 mg/kg body weight. Tumor progression and regression were monitored for 27 days. Animals inoculated s.c. with DU-145 Luc cells and then treated with topotecan demonstrated significant tumor growth and regression as measured with calipers and luminescent imaging. High correlation was observed between caliper and imaging results. The correlation coefficient was 0.75 for the control untreated group and 0.93 for the topotecan-treated group. Similarly, tumor progression and regression were measurable using luminescent imaging for untreated and topotecan-treated mice inoculated i.p. with MCF-7 Luc cells. These data indicate that luminescent imaging is a useful tool for evaluating anti-cancer drugs in vivo and may prove to be particularly useful for the development of novel agents. Luminescent imaging could also be used to locate and harvest residual tumors in drug-treated animals in order to study mechanisms of drug resistance.

The role of drug efflux pumps in acute myeloid leukemia

A major problem in the treatment of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the occurrence of resistance to structurally and functionally unrelated chemotherapeutic agents, called multidrug resistance (MDR). One of the known MDR mechanisms is the overexpression of adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-dependent efflux pumps. Permeability-glycoprotein (P-gp), the best characterized of the human drug efflux pumps, has been shown to be associated with poor treatment outcome in AML patients. Besides P-gp, in addition the multidrug resistance protein 1 (MRP1) appeared to contribute to the observed resistance in AML. Alternative transporter proteins, such as the MRP1 homologues MRP2, MRP3, MRP5 and MRP6, and the breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), have been shown to be expressed at variable levels in AML patient cells. The latter proteins have been described to confer resistance to chemotherapeutic agents, such as daunorubicin, mitoxantrone, etoposide and 6-mercaptopurine, which are generally used in the treatment of AML patients; however, theyhave not yet proven to play a role in drug resistance in AML. The present review gives an overview of the current knowledge concerning these drug transporters, with a focus on the role of the transporter proteins in AML.

Cellular, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic aspects of response to camptothecins: can we improve it?

The camptothecins provide a novel class of effective anticancer agents that exert their action against DNA topoisomerase I. Members of the camptothecins include topotecan, irinotecan, 9-aminocamptothecin, and 9-nitrocamptothecin, which are analogs of the plant alkaloid 20(S)-camptothecin. These agents vary in their antitumor efficacy and toxicity. Several pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic factors including cellular efflux, modulation of topoisomerases I and II, lactone stability, alterations in metabolism, and drug-drug interactions, influence the antitumor response and toxicity of these agents. Preclinical studies suggest that protracted schedules of administration produce greater antitumor effect than bolus administration. However, the optimal treatment regimens and administration schedules of these agents have yet to be established in clinical studies.

Irinotecan in the treatment of colorectal cancer: clinical overview

PURPOSE AND METHODS

For more than three decades, the therapeutic options for patients with advanced colorectal cancer have almost exclusively been based on fluoropyrimidines. With the recognition that topoisomerase-I (TOP-I) is an important therapeutic target in cancer therapy, irinotecan, a semisynthetic TOP-I-interactive camptothecin derivative, has been clinically established in the treatment of colorectal cancer.

RESULTS

Irinotecan was investigated as second-line chemotherapy after prior treatment with fluorouracil (FU)-based regimens in two large randomized phase III trials comparing irinotecan with either best supportive care or an infusional FU/leucovorin (LV) regimen. The outcomes of these trials established irinotecan as the standard therapy in the second-line treatment of colorectal cancer. The therapeutic value of irinotecan in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer was investigated in two large randomized phase III trials comparing the combination of irinotecan and FU/LV with FU/LV alone. Both trials demonstrated significant superior efficacy for the combination of irinotecan and FU/LV in terms of response rate, median time to disease progression, and median survival time. Consequently, the combination of irinotecan and FU/LV has been approved as first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and constitutes the reference therapy against which other treatment options must be tested in the future.

CONCLUSION

In this review, the clinical rationale and update of the present clinical status of irinotecan in the treatment of colorectal cancer and future prospects of irinotecan-based combinations are discussed.