Inhibition of trigeminal neurones after intravenous administration of naratriptan through an action at 5-hydroxy-tryptamine (5-HT(1B/1D)) receptors

Intervening in the Premonitory Phase to Prevent Migraine: Prospects for Pharmacotherapy

Migraine is a common brain condition characterised by disabling attacks of headache with sensory sensitivities. Despite increasing understanding of migraine neurobiology and the impacts of this on therapeutic developments, there remains a need for treatment options for patients underserved by currently available therapies. The first specific drugs developed to treat migraine acutely, the serotonin-5-hydroxytryptamine [5-HT1B/1D] receptor agonists (triptans), seem to require headache onset in order to have an effect, while early treatment during mild pain before headache escalation improves short-term and long-term outcomes. Some patients find treating in the early window once headache has started but not escalated difficult, and migraine can arise from sleep or in the early hours of the morning, making prompt treatment after pain onset challenging. Triptans may be deemed unsuitable for use in patients with vascular disease and in those of older age and may not be effective in a proportion of patients. Headache is also increasingly recognised as being just one of the many facets of the migraine attack, and for some patients it is not the most disabling symptom. In many patients, painless symptoms can start prior to headache onset and can reliably warn of impending headache. There is, therefore, a need to identify therapeutic targets and agents that may be used as early as possible in the course of the attack, to prevent headache onset before it starts, and to reduce both headache and non-headache related attack burden. Early small studies using domperidone, naratriptan and dihydroergotamine have suggested that this approach could be useful; these studies were methodologically less rigorous than modern day treatment studies, of small sample size, and have not since been replicated. The emergence of novel targeted migraine treatments more recently, specifically calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonists (gepants), has reignited interest in this strategy, with encouraging results. This review summarises historical and emerging data in this area, supporting use of the premonitory phase as an opportunity to intervene as early as possible in migraine to prevent attack-related morbidity.

Menthol dural application alters meningeal arteries tone and enhances excitability of trigeminocervical neurons in rats

Headaches, including migraines, can have a causal relationship to exposure to cold, and this relationship may be both positive and negative, as cold can both provoke and alleviate cephalgia. The role of thermoreceptors responsible for transduction of low temperatures belongs to the transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily melastatin member 8 (TRPM8). These channels mediate normal cooling sensation and have a role in both cold pain and cooling-mediated analgesia; they are seen as a potential target for principally new anti-migraine pharmaceuticals. Using a validated animal migraine models, we evaluated effects of menthol, the TRPM8-agonist, on trigeminovascular nociception. In acute experiments on male rats, effects of applied durally menthol solution in various concentrations on the neurogenic dural vasodilatation (NDV) and firing rate of dura-sensitive neurons of the trigeminocervical complex (TCC) were assessed. Application of menthol solution in concentrations of 5 % and 10 % was associated with NDV suppression, however amplitude reduction of the dilatation response caused not by the vascular dilatation degree decrease, but rather due to the significant increase of the meningeal arterioles' basal tone. In electrophysiological experiments the 1 % and 30 % menthol solutions intensified TCC neuron responses to the dural electrical stimulation while not changing their background activity. Revealed in our study excitatory effects of menthol related to the vascular as well as neuronal branches of the trigeminovascular system indicate pro-cephalalgic effects of TRPM8-activation and suggest feasibility of further search for new anti-migraine substances among TRPM8-antagonists.

KCl-induced repetitive cortical spreading depression inhibiting trigeminal neuronal firing is mediated by 5-HT1B/1D and opioid receptors

Background

We aimed to examine the effects of repetitive cortical spreading depression on the responses of nociceptive trigeminal neurons with dural afferents and characterize the role of 5-HT_1B/1D and opioid receptors.

Methods

Trigeminocervical complex neurons (n = 53) responsive to nociceptive activation of the dura mater were studied in rats using electrophysiological techniques.

Results

A sub-population (n = 32) showed an average inhibition of dural-evoked responses of 65 ± 14% from baseline with cortical spreading depression. This response was reversed by the selective 5-HT_1B/1D receptor antagonist, GR127935 (3 mg/kg; n = 6, iv), and a non-selective opioid receptor antagonist, naloxone (1.5 mg/kg; n = 6, iv), five minutes after injection. To determine the role of the nucleus raphe magnus in the trigeminocervical complex inhibitory effect, microinjection of lidocaine (2%, n = 6) or muscimol (100 mM, n = 5) into the nucleus raphe magnus was performed. There was no effect on cortical spreading depression-induced inhibition of neuronal firing in trigeminocervical complex by either.

Conclusion

The data demonstrate that repetitive cortical spreading depression inhibits a subpopulation of dural nociceptive trigeminocervical neurons, an effect mediated by serotonin and opioid receptors. This inhibition does not involve modulation of nucleus raphe magnus neurons.

A critical review of the neurovascular nature of migraine and the main mechanisms of action of prophylactic antimigraine medications

INTRODUCTION

Migraine involves neurovascular, functional, and anatomical alterations. Migraineurs experience an intense unilateral and pulsatile headache frequently accompanied with vomiting, nausea, photophobia, etc. Although there is no ideal preventive medication, frequency in migraine days may be partially decreased by some prophylactics, including antihypertensives, antidepressants, antiepileptics, and CGRPergic inhibitors. However, the mechanisms of action involved in antimigraine prophylaxis remain elusive.

AREAS COVERED

This review recaps some of the main neurovascular phenomena related to migraine and currently available preventive medications. Moreover, it discusses the major mechanisms of action of the recommended prophylactic medications.

EXPERT OPINION

In the last three years, migraine prophylaxis has evolved from nonspecific to specific antimigraine treatments. Overall, nonspecific treatments  mainly involve neural actions, whereas specific pharmacotherapy (represented by CGRP receptor antagonists and CGRPergic monoclonal antibodies) is predominantly mediated by neurovascular mechanisms that may include, among others: (i) reduction in the cortical spreading depression (CSD)-associated events; (ii) inhibition of pain sensitization; (iii) blockade of neurogenic inflammation; and/or (iv) increase in cranial vascular tone. Accordingly, the novel antimigraine prophylaxis promises to be more effective, devoid of significant adverse effects (unlike nonspecific treatments), and more beneficial for the quality of life of migraineurs.

Targeting reactive nitroxidative species in preclinical models of migraine

BACKGROUND

Reactive nitroxidative species, such as nitric oxide but particularly peroxynitrite, have been strongly implicated in pain mechanisms. Targeting peroxynitrite is anti-nociceptive in pain models, but little is known about its role in migraine mechanisms. Given the need to validate novel targets for migraine headache, our objective was to study the potential of reactive nitroxidative species, particularly peroxynitrite, as novel targets for drug discovery and their role in migraine mechanisms.

METHODS

We recorded neuronal activity in rats with extracellular electrodes and examined the effects of targeting nitric oxide or peroxynitrite on ongoing and cranial-evoked firing rates of central trigeminocervical neurons. We injected calcitonin gene-related peptide (which produces migraine-like headache in migraineurs) and characterized neuronal responses to cranial stimulation and on behavioral responses to nociceptive periorbital stimulation and determined the effects of targeting reactive nitroxidative species on the mediated changes.

RESULTS

L-NAME (nitric oxide synthase inhibitor) and Fe(III)5,10,15,20-tetrakis(4-sulfonatophenyl)porphyrinato chloride (FeTPPS; peroxynitrite decomposition catalyst) inhibited ongoing and dural-evoked responses of trigeminocervical neurons, without affecting normal facial-cutaneous responses. Calcitonin gene-related peptide caused activation and sensitization of dural-responsive trigeminovascular neurons with hypersensitivity to intracranial and extracranial stimulation, and reduction of periorbital withdrawal thresholds. Only the peroxynitrite decomposition catalyst prevented these neuronal and behavioral nociceptive responses.

DISCUSSION

The data support that calcitonin gene-related peptide mediates the underlying neurobiological mechanisms related to the development of migraine-like headache. They also confirm the role of nitric oxide and implicate peroxynitrite production along the trigeminovascular migraine pathway in these mechanisms. The data also support peroxynitrite as a novel and potentially effective target for migraine treatment. The current drug development focus on peroxynitrite decomposition catalysts for chronic pain disorders should therefore extend to migraine.

Electrical stimulation of the superior sagittal sinus suppresses A-type K+ currents and increases P/Q- and T-type Ca2+ currents in rat trigeminal ganglion neurons

BACKGROUND

Migraine is a debilitating neurological disorder involving abnormal trigeminovascular activation and sensitization. However, the underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms remain unclear.

METHODS

A rat model of conscious migraine was established through the electrical stimulation (ES) of the dural mater surrounding the superior sagittal sinus. Using patch clamp recording, immunofluorescent labelling, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and western blot analysis, we studied the effects of ES on sensory neuronal excitability and elucidated the underlying mechanisms mediated by voltage-gated ion channels.

RESULTS

The calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) level in the jugular vein blood and the number of CGRP-positive neurons in the trigeminal ganglia (TGs) were significantly increased in rats with ES-induced migraine. The application of ES increased actional potential firing in both small-sized IB₄-negative (IB₄^-) and IB₄⁺ TG neurons. No significant changes in voltage-gated Na⁺ currents were observed in the ES-treated groups. ES robustly suppressed the transient outward K⁺ current (I_A) in both types of TG neurons, while the delayed rectifier K⁺ current remained unchanged. Immunoblot analysis revealed that the protein expression of Kv4.3 was significantly decreased in the ES-treated groups, while Kv1.4 remained unaffected. Interestingly, ES increased the P/Q-type and T-type Ca²⁺ currents in small-sized IB₄^- TG neurons, while there were no significant changes in the IB₄⁺ subpopulation of neurons.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that ES decreases the I_A in small-sized TG neurons and increases P/Q- and T-type Ca²⁺ currents in the IB₄^- subpopulation of TG neurons, which might contribute to neuronal hyperexcitability in a rat model of ES-induced migraine.

Targeting the central projection of the dural trigeminovascular system for migraine prophylaxis

Migraine abortives likely target both peripheral-dural and central trigeminovascular mechanisms in mediating their therapeutic effects. However, in preclinical assays, many migraine preventives have little success at inhibiting similar trigeminovascular-mediated peripheral changes within the dural microenvironment. In addition, their effects on central trigeminovascular neuronal responses are largely unknown. Using a validated preclinical model of acute dural-intracranial (migraine-like) head pain, using Sprague Dawley rats, we tested whether migraine preventives suppress ongoing firing of central trigeminocervical neurons, and evoked responses to cranial neurovascular activation. Flunarizine, sodium valproate, propranolol, and amitriptyline, all dose-dependently inhibited ongoing spontaneous firing of dural trigeminovascular neurons, and differentially affected neuronal responses to intracranial-dural and extracranial-cutaneous somatosensory stimulation. Lamotrigine, only effective in the treatment of migraine aura, did not affect responses. These data provide a mechanistic rationale for the clinical effects of migraine preventives in the treatment of migraine, via the modulation of dural-responsive central trigeminovascular neurons. Also, given their limited effect on peripheral dural vasdilatory responses, these data also suggest that migraine preventives specifically target central, rather than peripheral, components of trigeminal neurovascular mechanisms involved in migraine pathophysiology, to mediate their preventive action. Finally, these data further validate this preclinical model of central trigeminovascular activation to screen migraine preventives.

Brain structure and function related to headache: Brainstem structure and function in headache

OBJECTIVE

To review and discuss the literature relevant to the role of brainstem structure and function in headache.

BACKGROUND

Primary headache disorders, such as migraine and cluster headache, are considered disorders of the brain. As well as head-related pain, these headache disorders are also associated with other neurological symptoms, such as those related to sensory, homeostatic, autonomic, cognitive and affective processing that can all occur before, during or even after headache has ceased. Many imaging studies demonstrate activation in brainstem areas that appear specifically associated with headache disorders, especially migraine, which may be related to the mechanisms of many of these symptoms. This is further supported by preclinical studies, which demonstrate that modulation of specific brainstem nuclei alters sensory processing relevant to these symptoms, including headache, cranial autonomic responses and homeostatic mechanisms.

REVIEW FOCUS

This review will specifically focus on the role of brainstem structures relevant to primary headaches, including medullary, pontine, and midbrain, and describe their functional role and how they relate to mechanisms of primary headaches, especially migraine.

Is selective 5-HT1F receptor agonism an entity apart from that of the triptans in antimigraine therapy?

Migraine is a neurovascular disorder that involves activation of the trigeminovascular system and cranial vasodilation mediated by release of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). The gold standard for acute migraine treatment are the triptans, 5-HT1B/1D/(1F) receptor agonists. Their actions are thought to be mediated through activation of: (i) 5-HT1B receptors in cranial blood vessels with subsequent cranial vasoconstriction; (ii) prejunctional 5-HT1D receptors on trigeminal fibers that inhibit trigeminal CGRP release; and (iii) 5-HT1B/1D/1F receptors in central nervous system involved in (anti)nociceptive modulation. Unfortunately, coronary arteries also express 5-HT1B receptors whose activation would produce coronary vasoconstriction; hence, triptans are contraindicated in patients with cardiovascular disease. In addition, since migraineurs have an increased cardiovascular risk, it is important to develop antimigraine drugs devoid of vascular (side) effects. Ditans, here defined as selective 5-HT1F receptor agonists, were developed on the basis that most of the triptans activate trigeminal 5-HT1F receptors, which may explain part of the triptans' antimigraine action. Amongst the ditans, lasmiditan: (i) fails to constrict human coronary arteries; and (ii) is effective for the acute treatment of migraine in preliminary Phase III clinical trials. Admittedly, the exact site of action is still unknown, but lasmiditan possess a high lipophilicity, which suggests a direct action on the central descending antinociceptive pathways. Furthermore, since 5-HT1F receptors are located on trigeminal fibers, they could modulate CGRP release. This review will be particularly focussed on the similarities and differences between the triptans and the ditans, their proposed sites of action, side effects and their cardiovascular risk profile.

Current and novel insights into the neurophysiology of migraine and its implications for therapeutics

Migraine headache and its associated symptoms have plagued humans for two millennia. It is manifest throughout the world, and affects more than 1/6 of the global population. It is the most common brain disorder, and is characterized by moderate to severe unilateral headache that is accompanied by vomiting, nausea, photophobia, phonophobia, and other hypersensitive symptoms of the senses. While there is still a clear lack of understanding of its neurophysiology, it is beginning to be understood, and it seems to suggest migraine is a disorder of brain sensory processing, characterized by a generalized neuronal hyperexcitability. The complex symptomatology of migraine indicates that multiple neuronal systems are involved, including brainstem and diencephalic systems, which function abnormally, resulting in premonitory symptoms, ultimately evolving to affect the dural trigeminovascular system, and the pain phase of migraine. The migraineur also seems to be particularly sensitive to fluctuations in homeostasis, such as sleep, feeding and stress, reflecting the abnormality of functioning in these brainstem and diencephalic systems. Implications for therapeutic development have grown out of our understanding of migraine neurophysiology, leading to major drug classes, such as triptans, calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonists, and 5-HT1F receptor agonists, as well as neuromodulatory approaches, with the promise of more to come. The present review will discuss the current understanding of the neurophysiology of migraine, particularly migraine headache, and novel insights into the complex neural networks responsible for associated neurological symptoms, and how interaction of these networks with migraine pain pathways has implications for the development of novel therapeutics.

Pathophysiology of Migraine: A Disorder of Sensory Processing

Plaguing humans for more than two millennia, manifest on every continent studied, and with more than one billion patients having an attack in any year, migraine stands as the sixth most common cause of disability on the planet. The pathophysiology of migraine has emerged from a historical consideration of the "humors" through mid-20th century distraction of the now defunct Vascular Theory to a clear place as a neurological disorder. It could be said there are three questions: why, how, and when? Why: migraine is largely accepted to be an inherited tendency for the brain to lose control of its inputs. How: the now classical trigeminal durovascular afferent pathway has been explored in laboratory and clinic; interrogated with immunohistochemistry to functional brain imaging to offer a roadmap of the attack. When: migraine attacks emerge due to a disorder of brain sensory processing that itself likely cycles, influenced by genetics and the environment. In the first, premonitory, phase that precedes headache, brain stem and diencephalic systems modulating afferent signals, light-photophobia or sound-phonophobia, begin to dysfunction and eventually to evolve to the pain phase and with time the resolution or postdromal phase. Understanding the biology of migraine through careful bench-based research has led to major classes of therapeutics being identified: triptans, serotonin 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists; gepants, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonists; ditans, 5-HT1F receptor agonists, CGRP mechanisms monoclonal antibodies; and glurants, mGlu5 modulators; with the promise of more to come. Investment in understanding migraine has been very successful and leaves us at a new dawn, able to transform its impact on a global scale, as well as understand fundamental aspects of human biology.

Neuropeptide Y inhibits the trigeminovascular pathway through NPY Y1 receptor: implications for migraine

In vivo electrophysiology in migraine animal model shows that neuropeptide Y dose dependently inhibits dural-evoked trigeminal activity, through NPY Y1 receptor activation. Implications for pain and premonitory symptomatology.

Migraine is a painful neurologic disorder with premonitory symptomatology that can include disturbed appetite. Migraine pathophysiology involves abnormal activation of trigeminocervical complex (TCC) neurons. Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is synthesized in the brain and is involved in pain modulation. NPY receptors are present in trigeminal ganglia and trigeminal nucleus caudalis suggesting a role in migraine pathophysiology. The present study aimed to determine the effect of systemic administration of NPY on TCC neuronal activity in response to dural nociceptive trigeminovascular activation. We performed in vivo electrophysiology in anesthetized rats, administered NPY (10, 30, and 100 µg·kg⁻¹), and investigated the receptors involved by studying NPY Y₁ (30 µg·kg⁻¹), Y₂ (30 µg·kg⁻¹), and Y₅ receptor agonists (100·µg·kg⁻¹), and NPY Y₁ receptor antagonist (30 µg·kg⁻¹). NPY (30 and 100 µg·kg⁻¹) significantly reduced TCC neuronal firing in response to dural-evoked trigeminovascular activation, but only NPY (30 µg·kg⁻¹) significantly reduced spontaneous trigeminal firing. NPY Y₁ receptor agonist also significantly reduced dural-evoked and spontaneous TCC neuronal firing. NPY (10 µg·kg⁻¹), NPY Y₂, and Y₅ receptor agonists, and the NPY Y₁ receptor antagonist had no significant effects on nociceptive dural-evoked neuronal firing in the TCC or spontaneous trigeminal firing. This study demonstrates that NPY dose dependently inhibits dural-evoked trigeminal activity, through NPY Y₁ receptor activation, indicating antinociceptive actions of NPY in a migraine animal model. Based on the role of NPY in appetite regulation, it is possible that disruption of the NPY system might explain changes of appetite in migraineurs.

Naratriptan Has a Selective Inhibitory Effect on Trigeminovascular Neurones at Central 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B/1D Receptors in the Cat: Implications for Migraine Therapy

The triptans are agonists at serotonin(5-HT) 1B/1D receptors; however, they are also active at 5-HT1A and 5-HT1F receptors. We conducted this series of experiments to further elucidate the site of action of naratriptan using a well-established animal model of trigeminovascular stimulation. Following electrical stimulation of the superior sagittal sinus of the cat, single cell responses ( n = 83) were recorded in the trigeminal nucleus caudalis. Most cells (91%) also responded to electrical and mechanical stimulation of cutaneous or mucosal facial receptive fields. The micro-iontophoretic application of naratriptan resulted in a significant suppression of the response to sagittal sinus stimulation (response suppressed by 47 ± 4%, P < 0.001). The effect of naratriptan was significantly attenuated by application of either the 5-HT1B/1D receptor antagonist GR-127935 ( P < 0.001) or the 5-HT1A antagonist WAY-100635 ( P < 0.05). The response of single cells to receptive field stimulation was also suppressed by microiontophoretic application of naratriptan, but by only 20 ± 3%. Intravenous administration of naratriptan resulted in a similar selective suppression of sagittal sinus vs. receptive field responses in trigeminal neurones. These results indicate that naratriptan has a central effect in the trigeminovascular system, selectively inhibiting afferent activity in craniovascular neurones, via both 5-HT1B/1D and 5-HT1A receptors.

Nitroglycerin-Induced nNOS Increase in Rat Trigeminal Nucleus Caudalis is Inhibited by Systemic Administration of Lysine Acetylsalicylate but not of Sumatriptan

Systemic administration of nitroglycerin (NTG), a nitric oxide (NO) donor, in migraineurs triggers after several hours an attack of which the precise mechanisms are unknown. We found previously in rats that nitroglycerin (10 mg/kg s.c.) is able to increase significantly after 4 h the number of neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS)-immunoreactive neurones in the cervical part of trigeminal nucleus caudalis. In the present experiments, we demonstrate that the 5-HT1B/D agonist sumatriptan (0.6 mg/kg s.c.) does not alter this phenomenon when given before NTG. By contrast, pretreatment with lysine acetylsalicylate (50 mg/kg i.m.) attenuates the NTG-induced nNOS expression in the superficial laminae of trigeminal nucleus caudalis. These findings suggest that effect of NTG on nNOS at a high dosage may involve the cycloxygenase pathway and that activation of the peripheral 5-HT1B/D receptors is not able to modify this effect. These data could help to better understand the role of NO in the pathogenesis of headaches and the action of antimigraine drugs.

Migraine in the era of precision medicine

Migraine is a common neurovascular disorder in the neurologic clinics whose mechanisms have been explored for several years. The aura has been considered to be attributed to cortical spreading depression (CSD) and dysfunction of the trigeminovascular system is the key factor that has been considered in the pathogenesis of migraine pain. Moreover, three genes (CACNA1A, ATP1A2, and SCN1A) have come from studies performed in individuals with familial hemiplegic migraine (FHM), a monogenic form of migraine with aura. Therapies targeting on the neuropeptids and genes may be helpful in the precision medicine of migraineurs. 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) receptor agonists and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonists have demonstrated efficacy in the acute specific treatment of migraine attacks. Therefore, ongoing and future efforts to find new vulnerabilities of migraine, unravel the complexity of drug therapy, and perform biomarker-driven clinical trials are necessary to improve outcomes for patients with migraine.

Intravenous dextromethorphan/quinidine inhibits activity of dura-sensitive spinal trigeminal neurons in rats

BACKGROUND

Migraine is a chronic neurological disorder characterized by episodes of throbbing headaches. Practically all medications currently used in migraine prophylaxis have a number of substantial disadvantages and use limitations. Therefore, the further search for principally new prophylactic antimigraine agents remains an important task. The objective of our study was to evaluate the effects of a fixed combination of dextromethorphan hydrobromide and quinidine sulphate (DM/Q) on activity of the spinal trigeminal neurons in an electrophysiological model of trigemino-durovascular nociception.

METHODS

The study was performed in 15 male Wistar rats, which were anaesthetized with urethane/α-chloralose and paralysed using pipecuronium bromide. The effects of cumulative intravenous infusions of DM/Q (three steps performed 30 min apart, 15/7.5 mg/kg of DM/Q in 0.5 mL of isotonic saline per step) on ongoing and dural electrical stimulation-induced neuronal activities were tested in a group of eight rats over 90 min. Other seven animals received cumulative infusion of equal volumes of saline and served as control.

RESULTS

Cumulative administration of DM/Q produced steady suppression of both the ongoing activity of the spinal trigeminal neurons and their responses to electrical stimulation of the dura mater.

CONCLUSIONS

It is evident that the observed DM/Q-induced suppression of trigeminal neuron excitability can lead to a reduction in nociceptive transmission from meninges to higher centres of the brain. Since the same mechanism is believed to underlie the pharmacodynamics of many well-known antimigraine drugs, results of the present study enable us to anticipate the potential efficacy of DM/Q in migraine.

Efficacy and mechanism of anticonvulsant drugs in migraine

Anticonvulsants represent one of the main substance classes used for the preventive treatment of migraine. Efficacy has been demonstrated in randomized placebo-controlled trials for topiramate and valproic acid including divalproex sodium. In the case of topiramate, efficacy has recently been proven for chronic migraine and even medication overuse headache, questioning the established concept of medication withdrawal. However, preventive treatment with anticonvulsants is frequently hampered by side effects that occasionally require treatment discontinuation. In addition, these data indicate that some anticonvulsant drugs are effective in migraine, while a number are clearly not useful. Effective anticonvulsants, such as topiramate and valproate, target nociceptive trigeminovascular and trigeminothalamic dural pathways or mechanisms involved in cortical spreading depression. Dissecting out how the anticonvulsants that do not work differ mechanistically from those that do will almost certainly provide avenues through which one can develop new treatments to bring to patients with migraine.

Functional neuroimaging of primary headache disorders

Until recently, primary headache disorders, such as migraine and cluster headache were considered to be vascular in origin. However, advances in neuroimaging techniques, such as positron emission tomography, single photon emission computed tomography and functional magnetic resonance imaging have augmented the growing clinical evidence that these headaches are primarily driven from the brain. This review covers functional imaging studies in migraine, cluster headache, rarer headache syndromes and experimental head pain. Together with newer techniques, such as voxel-based morphometry and magnetic resonance spectrometry, functional imaging continues to play a role in elucidating and targeting the neural substrates in each of the primary headache syndromes.

Endocannabinoids in the brainstem modulate dural trigeminovascular nociceptive traffic via CB1 and "triptan" receptors: implications in migraine

Activation and sensitization of trigeminovascular nociceptive pathways is believed to contribute to the neural substrate of the severe and throbbing nature of pain in migraine. Endocannabinoids, as well as being physiologically analgesic, are known to inhibit dural trigeminovascular nociceptive responses. They are also involved in the descending modulation of cutaneous-evoked C-fiber spinal nociceptive responses from the brainstem. The purpose of this study was to determine whether endocannabinoids are involved in the descending modulation of dural and/or cutaneous facial trigeminovascular nociceptive responses, from the brainstem ventrolateral periaqueductal gray (vlPAG). CB1 receptor activation in the vlPAG attenuated dural-evoked Aδ-fiber neurons (maximally by 19%) and basal spontaneous activity (maximally by 33%) in the rat trigeminocervical complex, but there was no effect on cutaneous facial receptive field responses. This inhibitory vlPAG-mediated modulation was inhibited by specific CB1 receptor antagonism, given via the vlPAG, and with a 5-HT1B/1D receptor antagonist, given either locally in the vlPAG or systemically. These findings demonstrate for the first time that brainstem endocannabinoids provide descending modulation of both basal trigeminovascular neuronal tone and Aδ-fiber dural-nociceptive responses, which differs from the way the brainstem modulates spinal nociceptive transmission. Furthermore, our data demonstrate a novel interaction between serotonergic and endocannabinoid systems in the processing of somatosensory nociceptive information, suggesting that some of the therapeutic action of triptans may be via endocannabinoid containing neurons in the vlPAG.

Chemical mediators of migraine: preclinical and clinical observations

Migraine is a neurovascular disorder, and although the pathophysiology of migraine has not been fully delineated, much has been learned in the past 50 years. This knowledge has been accompanied by significant advancements in the way migraine is viewed as a disease process and in the development therapeutic options. In this review, we will focus on 4 mediators (nitric oxide, histamine, serotonin, and calcitonin gene-related peptide) which have significantly advanced our understanding of migraine as a disease entity. For each mediator we begin by reviewing the preclinical data linking it to migraine pathophysiology, first focusing on the vascular mechanisms, then the neuronal mechanisms. The preclinical data are then followed by a review of the clinical data which support each mediator's role in migraine and highlights the pharmacological agents which target these mediators for migraine therapy.

Vagal afferent modulation of spinal trigeminal neuronal responses to dural electrical stimulation in rats

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an approved antiepileptic and antidepressant treatment, which has recently shown promise as a therapy for drug-resistant primary headaches. Specific neurobiological mechanisms underlying its anticephalgic action are not elucidated, partly because of the deficiency of research-related findings. The spinal trigeminal nucleus (STN) plays a prominent role in pathophysiology of headaches by modulating pain transmission from intracranial structures to higher centers of the brain. To determine whether vagal stimulation may affect trigeminovascular nociception, we investigated the effects of VNS on the STN neuronal activity in the animal model of headache. In anesthetized rats the spike activity of the STN neurons with convergent orofacial and meningeal inputs was monitored, and the changes in neuronal responses to electrical stimulation of the dura mater under preconditioning or under continuous electrical stimulation of the left cervical vagus nerve were studied. Preconditioning vagal afferent stimulation (200-ms train of pulses at 30 Hz applied before each dural stimulus) did not produce substantial changes in the STN spike activity. However, continuous VNS with frequency of 10 Hz in 48% of cases significantly suppressed trigeminal neuronal responses to dural electrical stimulation. In line with the decrease in evoked activity, the VNS-induced depression of ongoing neuronal firing was observed. Although the inhibitory effect was prevailing, 29.5% of STN neurons were facilitated by VNS, whereas 22.5% were unresponsive to the stimulation. These results provide an evidence of VNS-induced modulation of trigeminovascular nociception, and therefore contribute to a deeper understanding of neurophysiological mechanisms underlying effects of vagal stimulation in chronic drug-resistant headaches.

Spinal trigeminal neurons demonstrate an increase in responses to dural electrical stimulation in the orofacial formalin test

Primary headaches are often associated with pain in the maxillofacial region commonly classified under the term “orofacial pain” (OFP). In turn, long-lasting OFP can trigger and perpetuate headache as an independent entity, which is able to persist after the resolution of the main disorder. A close association between OFP and headache complicates their cause and effect definition and leads to misdiagnosis. The precise mechanisms underlying this phenomenon are poorly understood, partly because of the deficiency of research-related findings. We combined the animal models of OFP and headache—the orofacial formalin test and the model of trigeminovascular nociception—to investigate the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying their comorbidity. In anesthetized rats, the ongoing activity of single convergent neurons in the spinal trigeminal nucleus was recorded in parallel to their responses to the electrical stimulation of the dura mater before and after the injection of formalin into their cutaneous receptive fields. Subcutaneous formalin resulted not only in the biphasic increase in the ongoing activity, but also in an enhancement of neuronal responses to dural electrical stimulation, which had similar time profile. These results demonstrated that under tonic pain in the orofacial region a nociceptive signaling from the dura mater to convergent trigeminal neurons is significantly enhanced apparently because of the development of central sensitization; this may contribute to the comorbidity of OFP and headache.

Trigeminocervical complex responses after lesioning dopaminergic A11 nucleus are modified by dopamine and serotonin mechanisms

Both serotonergic and dopaminergic receptor modulation can alter trigeminal nociceptive processing, and descending A11 dopaminergic projections can affect trigeminal nociceptive transmission. Here we aimed to test the interaction between dopamine D(2) and serotonin 5-HT(1B/1D) receptors and their individual and combined effects in order to better understand the relationship of the descending influences of these systems on nociceptive trigeminovascular afferents. Extracellular recordings were made in the rat trigeminocervical complex in response to electrical stimulation of the dura mater and mechanical noxious and innocuous stimulation of the ipsilateral ophthalmic dermatome. The A11 nucleus was lesioned, and following the resultant facilitation of neuronal firing, one of a selective 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor agonist (naratriptan), selective 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor antagonist (GR127935), a selective D(2)-like receptor agonist (quinpirole), and a selective D(1)-like receptor agonist (dihydrexidine), or a combination of the above, were administered. Both quinpirole and quinpirole with naratriptan inhibited firing in the trigeminocervical complex evoked by noxious stimuli, reducing it below prelesion baseline, while the response to innocuous stimuli was reduced back to baseline. Both naratriptan alone, and quinpirole combined with GR127935, inhibited firing in the trigeminocervical complex evoked by noxious stimuli, returning it to prelesion baseline, while the response to innocuous stimuli remained facilitated. Immunohistochemical staining demonstrated D(2)-receptor and 5-HT(1B/1D)-receptor colocalization in the trigeminocervical complex. The data suggest that the serotonergic and dopaminergic antinociceptive pathways act simultaneously on neurons in the trigeminocervical complex, and both amine systems need to be functioning for trigeminal sensitization to be reversed.

Distribution of 5-HT(1B), 5-HT(1D) and 5-HT(1F) receptor expression in rat trigeminal and dorsal root ganglia neurons: relevance to the selective anti-migraine effect of triptans

Triptans, acting as serotonin, 5-HT(1B/1D/1F), receptor agonists, provide an effective and established treatment option in migraine and cluster headache. Clinical observations suggest a relatively specific effect of these compounds on primary headache disorders, but not in other pain syndromes. The mechanism of this specificity, however, is not well understood. Hence, we systematically studied primary sensory ganglia in rat to determine if the peripheral distribution of 5HT(1B/1D/1F) receptors showed any anatomical difference that would account for the specificity of clinical effect. Rat primary afferent and sensory ganglia neurons--trigeminal ganglia (Vg), and dorsal root ganglia (DRG): C(2), C(5), T(5), L(5)--were examined using paraffin-embedded, slide-bound tissue sections reacted with specific primary antibodies for rat 5-HT(1B, 1D) and (1F) receptors in a peroxidase-based immunohistochemical method. Immunoreactivity specific for all three serotonergic receptor subtypes was demonstrated in the five peripheral nervous system regions examined and quantitated. There was a good agreement for 5-HT(1B) and 5-HT(1D) receptors to that previously demonstrated in Vg and DRG L(5), while this was the first characterisation for 5-HT(1F) receptor in any of the five regions, as well as for 5-HT(1B) and 5HT(1D) receptors in DRG C(2), C(5) and T(5). In summary, all three 5-HT receptors are equally represented in Vg and the DRGs examined. We conclude that the triptans are theoretically able to bind to receptors at each level of the peripheral neuraxis without any apparent anatomical preference for the head.

The relevance of preclinical research models for the development of antimigraine drugs: focus on 5-HT(1B/1D) and CGRP receptors

Migraine is a complex neurovascular syndrome, causing a unilateral pulsating headache with accompanying symptoms. The past four decades have contributed immensely to our present understanding of migraine pathophysiology and have led to the introduction of specific antimigraine therapies, much to the relief of migraineurs. Pathophysiological factors culminating into migraine headaches have not yet been completely deciphered and, thus, pose an additional challenge for preclinical research in the absence of any direct experimental marker. Migraine provocation experiments in humans use a head-score to evaluate migraine, as articulated by the volunteer, which cannot be applied to laboratory animals. Therefore, basic research focuses on different symptoms and putative mechanisms, one at a time or in combination, to validate the hypotheses. Studies in several species, utilizing different preclinical approaches, have significantly contributed to the two antimigraine principles in therapeutics, namely: 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor agonists (known as triptans) and CGRP receptor antagonists (known as gepants). This review will analyze the preclinical experimental models currently known for the development of these therapeutic principles, which are mainly based on the vascular and/or neurogenic theories of migraine pathogenesis. These include models based on the involvement of cranial vasodilatation and/or the trigeminovascular system in migraine. Clearly, the preclinical strategies should involve both approaches, while incorporating the newer ideas/techniques in order to get better insights into migraine pathophysiology.

TRPV1 receptor blockade is ineffective in different in vivo models of migraine

Background: It has been proposed that TRPV1 receptors may play a role modulating trigeminal sensory processing. We used models of trigeminovascular nociceptive activation to study the involvement of TRPV1 receptors in the rat. Due to a possible role of TRPV1 receptors in cortical spreading depression (CSD), an experimental phenomenon sharing many features with migraine aura, we also utilized a model of mechanically induced CSD.

Methods: Male Sprague Dawley rats ( N = 39) were anesthetized and cannulated for monitoring and drug administration to study the effects of the TRPV1 receptor antagonist A-993610 (8 mg kg−1 IV). Wide-dynamic-range neurons, responding to electrical stimulation of the middle meningeal artery (MMA)/dura mater were identified and recorded using electrophysiological techniques. Intravital microscopy was used to study neurogenic dural vasodilation (NDV) of the MMA comparing capsaicin and electrical stimulation, and the effect of A-993610 on mechanically induced CSD was examined.

Results: Administration of A-993610 had no significant effect on trigeminal firing of A- or C-fibers elicited by electrical stimulation of the MMA. It also showed no effect on NDV whilst blocking vasodilation due to intravenous capsaicin injection. The mechanically induced CSD response could not be altered by A-993610 administration.

Conclusions: Although there is evidence that TRPV1 receptors play an important role in sensory processing in general, the new data do not support a role in the treatment of acute migraine.

Migraine recurrence is not associated with depressive or anxiety symptoms. Results of a randomized controlled trial

In order to investigate the plausible association of migraine recurrence with anxiety and depressive symptoms, a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover clinical trial was conducted using sumatriptan as a vehicle drug. Migraineurs were randomly assigned to receive either 50 mg sumatriptan or placebo for three consecutive migraine attacks, and then cross over to the other treatment for three more migraine attacks. The primary measurements were the observed rate of migraine recurrence in relation to (i) patient's mood condition, measured by the Hamilton rating scales for depression and anxiety and (ii) patient's general health and functioning measured by the Symptom Checklist (SCL)-90-R. Migraine recurrence was defined as any migrainous headache that occurred within 24 h post treatment, only when pain free at 2 h was achieved. The analysis of efficacy was performed on 376 migraine attacks treated with sumatriptan and 373 attacks treated with placebo. Recurrence ratio was 14.1% and 5.1%, respectively ( P = 0.045). The number needed to treat for pain free at 2 h post dose was 5.4. Recurrence was not affected by Hamilton scores for depression or anxiety, SCL-90-R scores or treatment. Apparently, depressive or anxiety symptoms do not influence headache recurrence in acute pharmaceutical migraine treatment, but further investigation is required.

Neurophysiological markers of central sensitisation in the trigeminal pathway and their modulation by the cyclo-oxygenase inhibitor ketorolac

Central sensitisation is a key mechanism of migraine; understanding its modulation by anti-migraine drugs is essential for rationalising treatment. We used an animal model of central trigeminal sensitisation to investigate neuronal responses to dural electrical stimulation as a putative electrophysiological marker of sensitisation and its modulation by ketorolac. In anaesthetised rats, responses of single convergent wide-dynamic range neurons of the spinal trigeminal nucleus to dural electrical simulation were recorded in parallel to their ongoing activity and responses to facial mechanical stimulation before and after a short-term dural application of an IS. Both ongoing activity and responses to dural electrical stimuli were enhanced by the inflammatory challenge, whereas neuronal thresholds to mechanical skin stimulation were reduced ( p < .05, N = 12). Intravenous ketorolac (2 mg/kg, N = 6) reduced ongoing activity and responses to dural electrical stimulation, and increased mechanical thresholds versus vehicle controls ( p < .05, N = 6). We conclude that neuronal responses to dural electrical stimulation can serve as a suitable marker which together with admitted electrophysiological signs can objectively detect central trigeminal sensitisation and its modulation by anti-migraine treatments in this preclinical model of migraine.

Does sumatriptan cross the blood-brain barrier in animals and man?

Sumatriptan, a relatively hydrophilic triptan, based on several animal studies has been regarded to be unable to cross the blood–brain barrier (BBB). In more recent animal studies there are strong indications that sumatriptan to some extent can cross the BBB. The CNS adverse events of sumatriptan in migraine patients and normal volunteers also indicate a more general effect of sumatriptan on CNS indicating that the drug can cross the BBB in man. It has been discussed whether a defect in the BBB during migraine attacks could be responsible for a possible central effect of sumatriptan in migraine. This review suggests that there is no need for a breakdown in the BBB to occur in order to explain a possible central CNS effect of sumatriptan.

Finding New Drug Targets for the Treatment of Migraine Attacks

No new preventive drugs specific to migraine have appeared for the last 20 years and existing acute therapies need improvement. Unfortunately, no animal models can predict the efficacy of new therapies for migraine. Because migraine attacks are fully reversible and can be aborted by therapy, the headache- or migraine-provoking property of naturally occurring signalling molecules can be tested in a human model. This model has predicted efficacy of nitric oxide synthase inhibition and calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor blockade. The pharmaceutical industry should pay more attention to human models, although methods are different from normal target validation.

The blood-brain barrier in migraine treatment

Salient aspects of the anatomy and function of the blood-barrier barrier (BBB) are reviewed in relation to migraine pathophysiology and treatment. The main function of the BBB is to limit the access of circulating substances to the neuropile. Smaller lipophilic substances have some access to the central nervous system by diffusion, whereas other substances can cross the BBB by carrier-mediated influx transport, receptor-mediated transcytosis and absorptive-mediated transcytosis. Studies of drugs relevant to migraine pathophysiology and treatment have been examined with the pressurized arteriography method. The drugs, given both luminally and abluminally, provide important notions regarding antimigraine site of action, probably abluminal to the BBB. The problems with the BBB in animal models designed to study the pathophysiology, acute treatment models and preventive treatments are discussed with special emphasize on the triptans and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). The human experimental headache model, especially the use of glycerol trinitrate (the nitric oxide model), and experiences with CGRP administrations utilize the systemic administration of the agonists with effects on other vascular beds also. We discuss how this can be related to genuine migraine attacks. Our view is that there exists no clear proof of breakdown or leakage of the BBB during migraine attacks, and that antimigraine drugs need to pass the BBB for efficacy.

Headache and pregnancy

BACKGROUND

Many women who suffer from migraine and tension-type headaches (TTHs) have an improvement in the frequency of these headaches during pregnancy. At the same time pregnancy predisposes women to a number of potentially life-threatening conditions which can present with headache. Accurate diagnosis and treatment of headache during pregnancy is essential.

REVIEW SUMMARY

The primary objectives of this review are to: (1) Summarize the natural history of primary headache disorders, including migraine, tension-type, and cluster headaches during pregnancy, as well as the impact of migraine on pregnancy outcomes and complications.(2) Summarize the therapeutic options and strategies for managing headaches in pregnancy and (3) Discuss the causes of secondary headaches and the diagnostic evaluation for new onset headache during pregnancy.

CONCLUSION

Primary headache disorders, in particular TTHs and migraines, generally improve during pregnancy. However the frequency of improvement varies greatly. Because the pathophysiology of both migraines and TTHs is poorly understood, this limits our ability to predict improvement. Future research should be focused on headache pathophysiology and the effect of ovarian hormones and the pregnant state on headache pathogenesis.

Uptake and biodistribution of rizatriptan to blood and brain following different routes of administration in rats

The objective of the present study was to investigate the biodistribution profiles of rizatriptan in the blood and brain of Wistar rats after peroral, subcutaneous, intranasal and intratracheal administration with a particular view to determining the applicability of inhalation delivery to achieve rapid and high availability of the drug in both blood and the brain. Following the intratracheal administration of the drug (4.0mg/kg) to the rats, the absolute bioavailability was found to be 91.2%, significantly higher than those from intranasal or peroral routes, and T(max) in plasma and brain was attained within 2 min, significantly shorter than the T(max) of intranasal ( approximately 10 min in both plasma and brain), subcutaneous (16.7 min in plasma and 22.5 min in brain) and peroral (30.0 min in plasma and 45.0 min in brain) administration. In addition, other pharmacokinetic parameters associated with rapid onset of action including AUC(plasma/brain) and C(max), of intratracheal instillated rizatriptan appeared also to be comparable or superior to those of other delivered routes. Although AUC(brain)/AUC(plasma) ratios after intranasal delivery (43.4%) differed significantly from the ratios shown after intratracheal instillation (23.2%), the AUC(brain 0-120 min) via the latter routes was slightly but not significantly higher than that from the former routes. The results in the present study indicated that pulmonary delivery of rizatriptan may achieve maximum plasma and brain concentrations significantly more rapidly compared with intranasal, subcutaneous and peroral administration and be a promising delivery method with extremely rapid onset of action in the pain relief of migraine.

The Discovery of a New Drug Class for the Acute Treatment of Migraine

The history of the scientific ideas and events that led to the discovery of sumatriptan is outlined with personal reminiscences about individuals who influenced the approach. The development of sumatriptan revolutionized the acute treatment of migraine and led to the availability of a number of other triptans. The anti-migraine effects of all the triptans are mediated via 5-HT(1B), and possibly 5-HT(1D) receptors, which transduce their effects via G; proteins. This suggests that agonists at other G(i) protein-coupled receptor types appropriately located (eg, somatostatin sst(2), adenosine A(1)) should be examined for their effects on the trigeminovascular system, Studies on such receptor targets may provide insight into a novel approach towards the design of new anti-migraine drugs.

Recent advances in understanding migraine mechanisms, molecules and therapeutics

Migraine is a complex, disabling disorder of the brain that manifests itself as attacks of often severe, throbbing head pain with sensory sensitivity to light, sound and head movement. There is a clear familial tendency to migraine, which has been well defined in a rare autosomal dominant form of familial hemiplegic migraine (FHM). FHM mutations so far identified include those in CACNA1A (P/Q voltage-gated Ca(2+) channel), ATP1A2 (N(+)-K(+)-ATPase) and SCN1A (Na(+) channel) genes. Physiological studies in humans and studies of the experimental correlate--cortical spreading depression (CSD)--provide understanding of aura, and have explored in recent years the effect of migraine preventives in CSD. Therapeutic developments in migraine have come by targeting the trigeminovascular system, with the most-recent being the proof-of-principle study of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonists in acute migraine. To understand the basic pathophysiology of migraine, brain imaging studies have firmly established reproducible changes in the brainstem in regions that include areas that are involved in sensory modulation. These data lead to the view that migraine is a form of sensory dysmodulatio--a system failure of normal sensory processing.

Serotonin receptor ligands: treatments of acute migraine and cluster headache

Fuelled by the development of the serotonin 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor agonists, the triptans, the last 15 years has seen an explosion of interest in the treatment of acute migraine and cluster headache. Sumatriptan was the first of these agonists, and it launched a wave of therapeutic advances. These medicines are effective and safe. Triptans were developed as cranial vasoconstrictors to mimic the desirable effects of serotonin, while avoiding its side-effects. It has subsequently been shown that the triptans' major action is neuronal, with both peripheral and central trigeminal inhibitory effects, as well as actions in the thalamus and at central modulatory sites, such as the periaqueductal grey matter. Further refinements may be possible as the 5-HT(1D) and 5-HT(1F) receptor agonists are explored. Serotonin receptor pharmacology has contributed much to the better management of patients with primary headache disorders.

Antimigraine drug, zolmitriptan, inhibits high-voltage activated calcium currents in a population of acutely dissociated rat trigeminal sensory neurons

Background

Triptans, 5-HT_1B/ID agonists, act on peripheral and/or central terminals of trigeminal ganglion neurons (TGNs) and inhibit the release of neurotransmitters to second-order neurons, which is considered as one of key mechanisms for pain relief by triptans as antimigraine drugs. Although high-voltage activated (HVA) Ca²⁺ channels contribute to the release of neurotransmitters from TGNs, electrical actions of triptans on the HVA Ca²⁺ channels are not yet documented.

Results

In the present study, actions of zolmitriptan, one of triptans, were examined on the HVA Ca²⁺ channels in acutely dissociated rat TGNs, by using whole-cell patch recording of Ba²⁺ currents (I_Ba) passing through Ca²⁺ channels. Zolmitriptan (0.1–100 μM) reduced the size of I_Ba in a concentration-dependent manner. This zolmitriptan-induced inhibitory action was blocked by GR127935, a 5-HT_1B/1D antagonist, and by overnight pretreatment with pertussis toxin (PTX). P/Q-type Ca²⁺ channel blockers inhibited the inhibitory action of zolmitriptan on I_Ba, compared to N- and L-type blockers, and R-type blocker did, compared to L-type blocker, respectively (p < 0.05). All of the present results indicated that zolmitriptan inhibited HVA P/Q- and possibly R-type channels by activating the 5-HT_1B/1D receptor linked to G_i/o pathway.

Conclusion

It is concluded that this zolmitriptan inhibition of HVA Ca²⁺ channels may explain the reduction in the release of neurotransmitters including CGRP, possibly leading to antimigraine effects of zolmitriptan.

Migraine Pathophysiology

A combination of basic science and human physiology, particularly functional neuroimaging, has radically altered our understanding of migraine with a focus on brain mechanisms for this common and disabling disorder. Genetic studies have begun to provide plausible targets for the basic molecular defect in terms of ion channels, albeit thus far in the rare condition of familial hemiplegic migraine (FHM). Migraine pathophysiology involves the trigeminovascular system and central nervous system modulation of the pain-producing structures of the cranium. The degree to which head pain results from the activation of the nociceptors of pain-producing intracranial structures, or to the facilitation or lack of inhibition of afferent signals, is not clear at this time. An understanding of the pain mechanism is likely to provide insights into the mechanisms underlying the more generalized sensory dysfunction that is so typical of migraine.