Mechanical and electrophysiological effects of endothelin-1 on guinea-pig isolated lower oesophageal sphincter circular smooth muscle

Alteration of the responses of gastric smooth muscle to endothelin in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats

Diabetic gastropathy is suggested to be the result of not only an autonomic neuropathy but also to disorder of the spontaneous rhythmic motility of the gastric smooth muscle. Attempts were made to investigate the alteration of the effects of endothelin-1 (ET-1), which is known to enhance the spontaneous activity of gastrointestinal smooth muscle, on gastric activity in streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic rats. STZ-induced diabetic rats were prepared by the injection of Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats with STZ (i.p.). Isometric mechanical responses were recorded in isolated circular smooth muscle strips of the stomach antrum, to measure changes in the rhythmicity of the smooth muscle. ET-1 (10 nM) significantly elevated the resting tension and the frequency of spontaneous contraction, but did not alter the amplitude of the spontaneous oscillatory contractions in normal rats. In diabetic rats, ET-1 elevated the resting tension, and spontaneous contractions were increased in frequency, however they were decreased in amplitude. In normal rats, sarafotoxin S6c (S6c, 10 nM), a selective ET(B) receptor agonist, elevated the resting tension slightly and increased both the frequency and amplitude of the spontaneous contractions. However, S6c significantly elevated the resting tension alone in STZ-induced diabetic rats. Selective stimulation of endothelin type A (ET(A)) receptors with ET-1, in the presence of a selective antagonist of ET(B) receptors, produced similar responses in the gastric muscle of both normal and diabetic rats. These results indicate that ET-1 elevates the resting tension and increases the frequency of the spontaneous oscillatory contractions in both normal and STZ-induced diabetic rats, to a similar extent. However, the specific actions on ET(B) receptors were quite different between the two: the elevating actions on the resting tension were much greater in STZ-diabetic rats than in normal rats. The results suggested the facilitation of ET(B) receptor signaling in the antrum during the pathogenesis of diabetic gastropathy.

Protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR1) and PAR2 but not PAR4 mediate relaxations in lower esophageal sphincter

Protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR1), PAR2 and PAR4 activation can alter the gastrointestinal motility. To investigate effects mediated by PARs in the lower esophageal sphincter, we measured contraction or relaxation of transverse strips from the guinea-pig lower esophageal sphincter caused by PAR1 (TFLLR-NH2 and SFLLRN-NH2), PAR2 (SLIGKV-NH2 and SLIGRL-NH2) and PAR4 peptide agonists (GYPGKF-NH2, GYPGQV-NH2 and AYPGKF-NH2) as well as PAR protease activators (thrombin and trypsin). In resting lower esophageal sphincter strips, TFLLR-NH2 and SFLLRN-NH2 caused moderate concentration-dependent relaxation whereas thrombin did not cause any relaxation or contraction. Furthermore, in carbachol-contracted strips, TFLLR-NH2 and SFLLRN-NH2 caused marked whereas thrombin caused mild concentration-dependent relaxation. These indicate the existence of PAR1 mediating relaxation. Similarly, in resting lower esophageal sphincter strips, trypsin caused moderate concentration-dependent relaxation whereas SLIGRL-NH2 and SLIGKV-NH2 did not cause any relaxation or contraction. In addition, in carbachol-contracted strips, trypsin caused marked whereas SLIGRL-NH2 and SLIGKV-NH2 caused mild concentration-dependent relaxation. These indicate the existence of PAR2 mediating relaxation. The relaxant response of thrombin, TFLLR-NH2, trypsin and SLIGKV-NH2 was insensitive to atropine or tetrodotoxin, suggesting a direct effect. The relaxant response of trypsin was not affected by apamin, charybdotoxin, indomethacin and capsaicin but was attenuated by NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester, indicating involvement of NO. FSLLR-NH2, a PAR1 control peptide, and VKGILS-NH2, a PAR2 control peptide, as well as all three PAR4 peptide agonists, GYPGKF-NH2, GYPGQV-NH2 and AYPGKF-NH2, did not cause any relaxation or contraction. Taken together, these results demonstrate that PAR1 and PAR2 but not PAR4 mediate relaxations in the guinea-pig lower esophageal sphincter.

Endothelin receptors in lower esophageal sphincter circular smooth muscle

To characterize endothelin (ET) receptors in the lower esophageal sphincter, we measured contraction of transverse strips from the guinea-pig lower esophageal sphincter induced by ET-related peptides and binding of 125I-ET-1 to cell membranes prepared from the lower esophageal sphincter circular muscle. Visualization of 125I-ET-1 binding sites in tissue was performed by autoradiography. ET-1 or ET-2 alone did not cause contraction or relaxation in resting strips. However, in carbachol precontracted lower esophageal sphincter strips, ET-1 and ET-2 caused marked, tetrodotoxin-insensitive relaxation. The ET-1-induced relaxation was abolished by BQ-123, an ETA receptor selective antagonist, but not inhibited by BQ-788, an ETB receptor selective antagonist. ET-3 and sarafotoxin S6c, a selective ETB receptor agonist, did not cause relaxation in the carbachol precontracted muscle strips. These clearly indicate that ETA receptors mediate relaxation. On the other hand, ET-3 and sarafotoxin S6c caused tetrodotoxin and atropine-insensitive contraction in the resting strips. The sarafotoxin S6c-induced contraction was inhibited by BQ-788, but not by BQ-123. Furthermore, ET-1 and ET-2 caused contraction of the resting muscle strips after pretreatment with BQ-123. This ET-1-induced contraction was also inhibited by BQ-788. Taken together, these indicate that ETB receptors mediate contraction. Autoradiography localized 125I-ET-1 binding to the lower esophageal sphincter circular muscle as well as longitudinal muscle of the esophagus. Binding of 125I-ET-1 to cell membranes prepared from the circular smooth muscle was saturable and specific. Analysis of dose-inhibition curves indicated the presence of two classes of receptors, ETA and ETB receptors. These results demonstrate that the guinea-pig lower esophageal sphincter possesses ETA receptors mediating relaxation and ETB receptors mediating contraction.

Diabetes-related changes in contractile responses of stomach fundus to endothelin-1 in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats

The contractile response of the stomach fundus to endothelin-1 (ET-1) was examined in streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic rats. In STZ-diabetic rats (versus age-matched control rats) (a) ET-1 caused a longer-lasting contraction of stomach fundus strips, and (b) in the dose-response curve, the ET-1-induced contraction was significantly greater for a given concentration (3 x 10(-7) to 10(-7) M). Although repeated application of ET-1 led to desensitization, the desensitization was less pronounced in STZ-diabetic rats than in the controls. The density of the binding sites for [(125)I]-ET-1 was increased in the diabetic stomach fundus (versus the controls), but Kd values were similar between the two groups. The ET(B) receptor mRNA expression level was significantly increased in the diabetic stomach fundus. These results suggest that the diabetes-related enhancement of the ET-1-induced contraction of the stomach fundus may be due to an increase in the ET(B) receptor population.

Effects of insulin on the acetylcholine-induced hyperpolarization in the guinea pig mesenteric arterioles

BACKGROUND

Insulin induces endothelium-dependent vasodilatation, which may be casually related to the insulin resistance and hypertension. Endothelium-derived nitric oxide (NO) is the most important mechanism of insulin-induced vasodilatation, and a possible contribution of endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF) is also considered. Attempts were made to observe the effects of insulin on acetylcholine (ACh)-induced hyperpolarization in the submucosal arteriole of the guinea pig ileum, the objective being to investigate possible involvement of EDHF in the actions of insulin.

METHODS

Conventional microelectrode techniques were applied to measure the membrane potential of smooth muscle cells in the submucosal arteriole. EDHF-induced hyperpolarization was elicited by ACh in the presence of both N(omega)-nitro-L-arginine (L-NNA) (100 microM) and diclofenac (1 microM).

RESULTS

The resting membrane potential was -70.9 mV, and Ba(2+) (0.5 mM) depolarized the membrane to -33.0 mV. Insulin (10 microU/ml to 100 mU/ml) did not change the membrane potential in the absence or presence of Ba(2+). In the presence of Ba(2+), ACh (3 microM) hyperpolarized the membrane with two components, an initial large hyperpolarization followed by a slow and small one. Low concentration of insulin (100 microU/ml) did not alter the ACh-induced hyperpolarization. High concentration of insulin (100 mU/ml) shortened the time required to reach the peak amplitude and tended to increase the peak amplitude of the ACh-induced hyperpolarization.

CONCLUSIONS

The data show that insulin enhances the ACh-induced hyperpolarization in the submucosal arterioles of the guinea pig ileum. The results suggested that EDHF also accounts for one of the endothelial factors involved in the insulin-induced vasodilatation.

Endothelin causes contraction of human esophageal muscularis mucosae through interaction with both ETA and ETB receptors

Endothelin (ET) causes contraction of the muscularis mucosae in the guinea pig esophagus, but its role in the human esophagus remains unknown. To investigate effects of ET in the human esophagus, we measured contraction of isolated human esophageal muscularis mucosae strips caused by ET related peptides and binding of 125I-ET-1 to cell membranes prepared from the human esophageal muscularis mucosae. Autoradiography demonstrated specific binding of 125I-ET-1 to the muscularis mucosae and muscularis propria (muscularis externa) of the human esophagus. ET-1 caused tetrodotoxin and atropine-insensitive contraction of muscularis mucosae strips. In terms of the maximal tension of contraction, ET-1 and ET-2 were equal in efficacy. The relative potencies for ET related peptides to cause contraction were ET-1=ET-2>ET-3>sarafotoxin S6c (SX6c), an ETB receptor agonist. ET-1 caused contraction was mildly inhibited by BQ-123, an ETA receptor antagonist, and not by BQ-788, an ETB receptor antagonist. It was moderately inhibited by the combination of both antagonists, indicating synergistic inhibition. Furthermore, desensitization to SX6c with SX6c pretreatment failed to abolish the contractile response to ET-1, which was completely inhibited by BQ-123. These indicate the involvement of both ETA and ETB receptors in the contraction. Binding of 125I-ET-1 to cell membranes of the muscularis mucosae was saturable and specific. Analysis of dose-inhibition curves demonstrated the presence of ETA and ETB receptors. This study demonstrates that, the muscularis mucosae of the human esophagus, similar to that of the guinea pig esophagus, possesses both ETA and ETB receptors mediating muscle contraction.

Effects of endothelin-1 on the membrane potential and slow waves in circular smooth muscle of rat gastric antrum

Electrophysiological effects of endothelin-1 (ET-1) on circular smooth muscle of rat gastric antrum were investigated by using intracellular membrane potential recording techniques. ET-1 (10 nM) caused an initial hyperpolarization of the membrane which was followed by a sustained depolarization. ET-1 also increased the frequency but not the amplitude of slow waves. In the presence of the endothelin type A (ETA) receptor antagonist, BQ123 (1 microM), ET-1 (10 nM) depolarized the membrane and increased the frequency of slow waves, but without the initial hyperpolarization. The selective endothelin type B (ETB) receptor agonist, sarafotoxin S6c (10 nM), also depolarized the membrane and increased the frequency of slow waves. In the presence of the ETB receptor antagonist, BQ788 (1 microM), ET-1 (10 nM) hyperpolarized the membrane. However, in the presence of BQ788, ET-1 caused neither the depolarization nor the increase in the frequency of the slow waves. The ET-1-induced hyperpolarization was completely abolished by apamin (0.1 microM). In the presence of apamin, ET-1 depolarized the membrane and increased the frequency of slow waves. The ET-1-induced depolarization was significantly attenuated by 4,4'-diisothiocyanatostilbene-2,2'-disulphonic acid (DIDS, 0.3 mM). The increase of the frequency by ET-1 was observed both in the presence and absence of DIDS. These results suggest that, ET-1 hyperpolarizes the membrane by the activation of Ca2+-activated K+ channels via ETA receptors, and depolarizes the membrane by the activation of Ca2+-activated Cl- channels via ETB receptors. ET-1 also appears to increase the frequency of slow waves via ETB receptors, however this mechanism would seem to be independent of membrane depolarization.

Endothelin ET(A) but not ET(B) receptors mediate contraction of common bile duct

Endothelin (ET) causes contraction of the gallbladder. To investigate effects of ET in the common bile duct, we measured contraction of longitudinal muscle strips from guinea pig common bile ducts induced by ET-related peptides and binding of 125I-ET-1 to cell membranes prepared from the common bile duct. Visualization of 125I-ET-1 binding sites in tissue was performed by autoradiography. ET-1 caused tetrodotoxin and atropine-insensitive contraction. In terms of maximal tension of contraction, ET-1, ET-2 and ET-3 were equal in efficacy. However, sarafotoxin S6c, a selective ET(B) receptor agonist, caused only a negligible contraction. The relative potencies for ET isopeptides to cause contraction were ET-1=ET-2>ET-3. The ET-1-induced contraction was inhibited by BQ-123, an ET(A)-receptor-selective antagonist, but not by BQ-788, an ET(B)-receptor-selective antagonist. In addition, the combination of both antagonists, BQ-123 and BQ-788, inhibited ET-1 induced contraction but did not potentiate the inhibition caused by BQ-123 alone. These indicate that ET(A) but not ET(B) receptors mediate the contraction. Autoradiography localized 125I-ET-1 binding to the smooth muscle layer. Binding of 125I-ET-1 to the smooth muscle cell membranes was saturable and specific. Analysis of dose-inhibition curves indicated the presence of ET(A) and ET(B) receptors. These results demonstrate that ET causes contraction of longitudinal muscle of the common bile duct. Different from the gallbladder, which possesses both ET(A) and ET(B) receptors cooperating to mediate muscle contraction, the common bile duct possesses two classes of ET receptors, but only the ET(A) receptor mediates the contraction.