Interactions between adenosine and metabotropic glutamate receptors in the rat hippocampal slice

Functional Cross-Talk between Adenosine and Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors

Abstract: G-protein coupled receptors are transmembrane proteins widely expressed in cells and their transduction pathways are mediated by controlling second messenger levels through different G-protein interactions. Many of these receptors have been described as involved in the physiopathology of neurodegenerative diseases and even considered as potential targets for the design of novel therapeutic strategies. Endogenous and synthetic allosteric and orthosteric selective ligands are able to modulate GPCRs at both gene and protein expression levels and can also modify their physiological function. GPCRs that coexist in the same cells can homo- and heteromerize, therefore, modulating their function. Adenosine receptors are GPCRs which stimulate or inhibit adenylyl cyclase activity through Gi/Gs protein and are involved in the control of neurotransmitter release as glutamate. In turn, metabotropic glutamate receptors are also GPCRs which inhibit adenylyl cyclase or stimulate phospholipase C activities through Gi or Gq proteins, respectively. In recent years, evidence of crosstalk mechanisms be-tween different GPCRs have been described. The aim of the present review was to summarize the described mechanisms of interaction and crosstalking between adenosine and metabotropic glutamate receptors, mainly of group I, in both in vitro and in vivo systems, and their possible use for the design of novel ligands for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases.

Interaction of adenosine receptors with other receptors from therapeutic perspective in Parkinson's disease

Altered dopaminergic neurotransmission in the basal ganglia is observed in Parkinson's disease (PD) and L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA)-induced dyskinesias (LID). An attractive alternative for treating LID is to use adjunct drugs to modulate nondopaminergic neurotransmitter systems in the basal ganglia. For example, adenosine receptors have received attention over the past years for the treatment of PD and LID. Adenosine interacts closely with dopamine and plays an important role in the function of striatal GABAergic efferent neurons. Excitatory glutamatergic neurotransmission is also modulated by adenosine in the striatum. Hence, based on the unique cellular and regional distribution of this system, adenosine neurotransmission could have an important implication for the development of new therapeutic strategies targeting the basal ganglia disorders. Indeed, A2A adenosine receptor antagonists were shown to improve motor deficits in PD and to reduce the severity of LID. A2A receptor subtypes are selectively found on striatopallidal neurons and can couple with receptors of interest in PD, such as D2 dopamine and metabotropic glutamate receptor type 5 (mGlu5) receptors, and form functional heteromeric complexes. This chapter will review relevant studies investigating the role and contribution of adenosine receptor subtypes in pathophysiology of PD and LID. The interactions of adenosine receptors, especially A1 and A2A receptor subtypes, with other receptors implicated in the pathophysiology of PD and LID such as dopaminergic and glutamatergic receptors will be reviewed. The implication of these interactions in the development and expression of PD symptoms and LID needs further investigation to find novel drug targets.

Tuning and fine-tuning of synapses with adenosine

The ‘omnipresence’ of adenosine in all nervous system cells (neurons and glia) together with the intensive release of adenosine following insults, makes adenosine as a sort of ‘maestro’ of synapses leading to the homeostatic coordination of brain function. Besides direct actions of adenosine on the neurosecretory mechanisms, where adenosine operates to tune neurotransmitter release, receptor-receptor interactions as well as interplays between adenosine receptors and transporters occur as part of the adenosine’s attempt to fine tuning synaptic transmission. This review will focus on the different ways adenosine can use to trigger or brake the action of several neurotransmitters and neuromodulators. Adenosine receptors cross talk with other G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), with ionotropic receptors and with receptor kinases. Most of these interactions occur through A2A receptors, which in spite their low density in some brain areas, such as the hippocampus, may function as metamodulators. Tonic adenosine A2A receptor activity is a required step to allow synaptic actions of neurotrophic factors, namely upon synaptic transmission at both pre- and post-synaptic level as well as upon synaptic plasticity and neuronal survival. The implications of these interactions in normal brain functioning and in neurologic and psychiatric dysfunction will be discussed.

Control of cannabinoid CB1 receptor function on glutamate axon terminals by endogenous adenosine acting at A1 receptors

Marijuana is a widely used drug that impairs memory through interaction between its psychoactive constituent, Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta(9)-THC), and CB(1) receptors (CB1Rs) in the hippocampus. CB1Rs are located on Schaffer collateral (Sc) axon terminals in the hippocampus, where they inhibit glutamate release onto CA1 pyramidal neurons. This action is shared by adenosine A(1) receptors (A1Rs), which are also located on Sc terminals. Furthermore, A1Rs are tonically activated by endogenous adenosine (eADO), leading to suppressed glutamate release under basal conditions. Colocalization of A1Rs and CB1Rs, and their coupling to shared components of signal transduction, suggest that these receptors may interact. We examined the roles of A1Rs and eADO in regulating CB1R inhibition of glutamatergic synaptic transmission in the rodent hippocampus. We found that A1R activation by basal or experimentally increased levels of eADO reduced or eliminated CB1R inhibition of glutamate release, and that blockade of A1Rs with caffeine or other antagonists reversed this effect. The CB1R-A1R interaction was observed with the agonists WIN55,212-2 and Delta(9)-THC and during endocannabinoid-mediated depolarization-induced suppression of excitation. A1R control of CB1Rs was stronger in the C57BL/6J mouse hippocampus, in which eADO levels were higher than in Sprague Dawley rats, and the eADO modulation of CB1R effects was absent in A1R knock-out mice. Since eADO levels and A1R activation are regulated by homeostatic, metabolic, and pathological factors, these data identify a mechanism in which CB1R function can be controlled by the brain adenosine system. Additionally, our data imply that caffeine may potentiate the effects of marijuana on hippocampal function.

Adenosine receptors and the central nervous system

The adenosine receptors (ARs) in the nervous system act as a kind of "go-between" to regulate the release of neurotransmitters (this includes all known neurotransmitters) and the action of neuromodulators (e.g., neuropeptides, neurotrophic factors). Receptor-receptor interactions and AR-transporter interplay occur as part of the adenosine's attempt to control synaptic transmission. A(2A)ARs are more abundant in the striatum and A(1)ARs in the hippocampus, but both receptors interfere with the efficiency and plasticity-regulated synaptic transmission in most brain areas. The omnipresence of adenosine and A(2A) and A(1) ARs in all nervous system cells (neurons and glia), together with the intensive release of adenosine following insults, makes adenosine a kind of "maestro" of the tripartite synapse in the homeostatic coordination of the brain function. Under physiological conditions, both A(2A) and A(1) ARs play an important role in sleep and arousal, cognition, memory and learning, whereas under pathological conditions (e.g., Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, stroke, epilepsy, drug addiction, pain, schizophrenia, depression), ARs operate a time/circumstance window where in some circumstances A(1)AR agonists may predominate as early neuroprotectors, and in other circumstances A(2A)AR antagonists may alter the outcomes of some of the pathological deficiencies. In some circumstances, and depending on the therapeutic window, the use of A(2A)AR agonists may be initially beneficial; however, at later time points, the use of A(2A)AR antagonists proved beneficial in several pathologies. Since selective ligands for A(1) and A(2A) ARs are now entering clinical trials, the time has come to determine the role of these receptors in neurological and psychiatric diseases and identify therapies that will alter the outcomes of these diseases, therefore providing a hopeful future for the patients who suffer from these diseases.

Effect of glutamate intake during gestation on adenosine A(1) receptor/adenylyl cyclase pathway in both maternal and fetal rat brain

Pregnant Wistar rats were orally treated with 1 g/L l-glutamate during the entire gestational period and the status of adenosine A(1) receptor (A(1)R)/adenylyl cyclase transduction pathway from maternal and fetal brain was analyzed. Glutamate consumption, estimated from the loss of water from the drinking bottles, was 110 +/- 4.6 mg/kg/day. In mother brains glutamate intake did not significantly alter the B(max) value, although the K(d) value was significantly decreased. However in fetus brain, a significant decrease in B(max) was observed, without an alteration of K(d) value. Similar results were observed by western blot assays using specific A(1)R antibody, suggesting a down-regulation of A(1)R in fetal brain. Concerning alpha subunits of inhibitory G proteins (Gi), alphaGi(3) protein was slightly but significantly decreased in maternal brain without alterations of either Gi(1) or Gi(2). In contrast, alphaGi(1) and alphaGi(2) isoforms were increased in fetal brain. On the other hand, basal, forskolin, and forskolin plus GTPgammaS-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity was significantly decreased in both maternal and fetal brain, and this was more prominent in fetal than in maternal brain. Finally, A(1)R functionality was significantly decreased in mother brain whereas no significant differences were detected in fetus brain. These results suggest that glutamate administered to pregnant rats modulates A(1)R signaling pathways in both tissues, showing an A(1)R down-regulation in fetal brain, and desensitization in maternal brain.

Physiology and pathophysiology of purinergic neurotransmission

This review is focused on purinergic neurotransmission, i.e., ATP released from nerves as a transmitter or cotransmitter to act as an extracellular signaling molecule on both pre- and postjunctional membranes at neuroeffector junctions and synapses, as well as acting as a trophic factor during development and regeneration. Emphasis is placed on the physiology and pathophysiology of ATP, but extracellular roles of its breakdown product, adenosine, are also considered because of their intimate interactions. The early history of the involvement of ATP in autonomic and skeletal neuromuscular transmission and in activities in the central nervous system and ganglia is reviewed. Brief background information is given about the identification of receptor subtypes for purines and pyrimidines and about ATP storage, release, and ectoenzymatic breakdown. Evidence that ATP is a cotransmitter in most, if not all, peripheral and central neurons is presented, as well as full accounts of neurotransmission and neuromodulation in autonomic and sensory ganglia and in the brain and spinal cord. There is coverage of neuron-glia interactions and of purinergic neuroeffector transmission to nonmuscular cells. To establish the primitive and widespread nature of purinergic neurotransmission, both the ontogeny and phylogeny of purinergic signaling are considered. Finally, the pathophysiology of purinergic neurotransmission in both peripheral and central nervous systems is reviewed, and speculations are made about future developments.

Negative cross-talk between presynaptic adenosine and acetylcholine receptors

Functional interactions between presynaptic adenosine and acetylcholine (ACh) autoreceptors were studied at the frog neuromuscular junction by recording miniature end-plate potentials (MEPPs) during bath or local application of agonists. The frequency of MEPPs was reduced by adenosine acting on presynaptic adenosine A1 receptors (EC(50) = 1.1 microm) or by carbachol acting on muscarinic M2 receptors (EC(50) = 1.8 microm). However, carbachol did not produce the depressant effect when it was applied after the action of adenosine had reached its maximum. This phenomenon implied that the negative cross-talk (occlusion) had occurred between A1 and M2 receptors. Moreover, the occlusion was receptor-specific as ATP applied in the presence of adenosine continued to depress MEPP frequency. Muscarinic antagonists [atropine or 1-[[2-[(diethylamino)methyl)-1-piperidinyl]acetyl]-5,11-dihydro-6H-pyrido [2,3-b][1,4]benzodiazepine-6-one) (AFDX-116)] had no effect on the inhibitory action of adenosine and adenosine antagonists [8-(p-sulfophenyl)theophylline (8-SPT) or 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine (DPCPX)] had no effect on the action of carbachol. These data suggested that membrane-delimited interactions did not occur between A1 and M2 receptors. Both carbachol and adenosine similarly inhibited quantal release triggered by high potassium, ionomycin or sucrose. These results indicated a convergence of intracellular pathways activated by M2 and A1 receptors to a common presynaptic effector located downstream of Ca(2+) influx. We propose that the negative cross-talk between two major autoreceptors could take place during intense synaptic activity and thereby attenuate the presynaptic inhibitory effects of ACh and adenosine.

Selective subunit antagonists suggest an inhibitory relationship between NR2B and NR2A-subunit containing N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors in hippocampal slices

Glutamate receptors responding to N-methyl-D: -aspartate (NMDA) are involved in neural development, excitotoxicity and neuronal plasticity. Each receptor includes at least two NR2 subunits. Here, we have examined the effects of selective antagonists of NR2A and NR2B subunits (NVP-AAM07 and Ro25-6981 respectively) on the effects of NMDA in the CA1 field of rat hippocampal slices. We have observed that Ro25-6981 potentiates, rather than blocks, the effects of NMD on field EPSPs and paired-pulse interactions (indicators of presynaptic effects) and on postsynaptic depolarisation in hippocampal slices. The NR2A subunit antagonist NVP-AAM077 blocks the effects of NMDA alone, or after potentiation by Ro25-6981. The potentiation of NMDA by Ro25-6981 was not prevented by staurosporine (protein kinase inhibitor), okadaic acid (an inhibitor of serine/threonine protein phosphatases) or anisomycin (protein synthesis inhibitor), but was prevented by cyclosporin A, which inhibits Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent phosphatase 2B [calcineurin]. NMDA-dependent long-term potentiation (LTP) induced by electrical stimulation was not prevented by Ro25-6981 but was prevented by selective blockade of the NR2A subunit. The results suggest that, at both presynaptic and postsynaptic sites in the rat hippocampus, NR2B-subunit-containing receptors limit NMDA receptor function by inhibitory restraint over NR2A-subunit-containing receptors, via calcineurin activation, and that LTP induction critically involves primarily receptors containing the NR2A subunit. Endogenous factors or drugs that modify this NR2B/NR2A interaction could have a major influence on synaptic transmission and plasticity in the brain.

Blockade of presynaptic adenosine A1 receptor responses by nitric oxide and superoxide in rat hippocampus

Activation of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors prevents the neuronal responses to adenosine in hippocampal slices. As NMDA receptor activation leads to the generation of nitric oxide (NO) and superoxide, we have examined whether these can modify neuronal responses to adenosine and mediate the actions of NMDA. Field excitatory postsynaptic potentials were recorded in the CA1 region of rat hippocampal slices. Paired-pulse interactions were studied to localize the observed interactions to presynaptic terminals. The NO donors S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine and diethylamine NONOate induced a long-lasting potentiation (NO-induced potentiation) of field excitatory postsynaptic potential slope and significantly prevented the presynaptic inhibitory effect of adenosine or the A1 receptor agonist N6-cyclopentyladenosine selectively with no effect on responses to baclofen. The superoxide-generating system of xanthine/xanthine oxidase also prevented presynaptic responses to adenosine and this effect was prevented by superoxide dismutase (SOD). The guanylate cyclase inhibitor 1H-[1,2,4]-oxadiazolo[4,3a]quinoxalin-1-one (10 microM) prevented NO-induced potentiation and the inhibitory effects of S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine and xanthine/xanthine oxidase on adenosine responses. The inhibitory effect of NMDA on adenosine responses was unchanged by 1H-[1,2,4]-oxadiazolo[4,3a]quinoxalin-1-one, indicating that guanosine-3',5-cyclic monophosphate does not mediate this interaction, although it was partially reduced by SOD, suggesting that superoxide might contribute. The reduction of adenosine responses by electrically-induced long-term potentiation was prevented by NO synthase inhibition or SOD. The results indicate that the presynaptic effects of adenosine at presynaptic sites can be prevented by NO or superoxide but that neither of these individually can fully account for the prevention of adenosine responses by NMDA.

Group I Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Activation Produces a Direct Excitation of Identified Septohippocampal Cholinergic Neurons

Septohippocampal cholinergic neurons innervate the hippocampus and provide it with almost its entire acetylcholine. Axon collaterals of these neurons also release acetylcholine within the septum and thereby maintain the firing activity of septohippocampal GABAergic neurons. A loss of septohippocampal cholinergic neurons occurs in various neurodegenerative disorders associated with cognitive dysfunctions. group I metabotropic glutamate receptors have been implicated in septohippocampal-dependent learning and memory tasks. In the present study, we examined the physiological and pharmacological effects of a potent and selective group I metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR) agonist S-3,5-dihydroxyphenylglycine (DHPG) on rat septohippocampal cholinergic neurons that were identified in brain slices using a selective fluorescent marker. In whole cell recordings, DHPG produced a reversible, reproducible and a direct postsynaptic and concentration-dependent excitation in 100% of septohippocampal cholinergic neurons tested with an EC50 of 2.1 μM. Pharmacologically, the effects of DHPG were partially/completely reduced by the mGluR1 antagonists, 7-hydrox-iminocyclopropan[b]chromen-1a-carboxylic acid ethyl ester and (+)-2-methyl-4-carboxyphenylglycine. Addition of the mGluR5 antagonist, 2-methyl-6-(phenylethnyl)pyridine hydrochloride, reduced the remaining response to DHPG, suggesting involvement of both receptor subtypes in a subpopulation of septohippocampal cholinergic neurons. In double-immunolabeling studies, 74% of septohippocampal cholinergic neurons co-localized mGluR1α-immunoreactivity and 35% co-localized mGluR5-immunoreactivity. Double-immunolabeling studies at the light and electron-microscopic levels showed that vesicular glutamate transporter 2 terminals make asymmetric synaptic contacts with septohippocampal cholinergic neurons. These findings may be of significance in treatment of cognitive deficits associated with neurodegenerative disorders as a group I mGluR-mediated activation of septohippocampal cholinergic neurons would enhance the release of acetylcholine both in the hippocampus and in the septum.

The mechanism of inhibition by xanthine of adenosine A1-receptor responses in rat hippocampus

We have recently observed that the free radical-generating mixture of xanthine and xanthine oxidase (X/XO) can suppress the inhibitory effects of adenosine on synaptic transmission in the hippocampus, but that this action can be mimicked by xanthine alone. We have now clarified the mechanism of these interactions by using the new, potent and highly selective inhibitor of xanthine oxidase, 1-(3-cyano-4-neopentyloxyphenyl)pyrazole-4-carboxylic acid (Y-700). Field excitatory postsynaptic potentials (fEPSPs) were recorded in the CA1 region of rat hippocampal slices. X/XO induced a long-lasting increase of fEPSP slope and significantly reduced the presynaptic inhibitory effect of adenosine. Both these actions were prevented by Y-700 at a concentration of only 200nM. Similarly the superfusion of xanthine alone increased fEPSP slope and reduced sensitivity to adenosine but these effects were also prevented by Y-700. The results indicate that the antagonism of adenosine responses by X/XO or by xanthine alone are entirely attributable to the activity of the added or endogenous XO activity, probably generating free radicals, and are not likely to be caused by a direct antagonistic action at the xanthine-sensitive site on the adenosine receptor.