Effect of gastrointestinal inflammation and age on the pharmacokinetics of oral microemulsion cyclosporin A in the first month after bone marrow transplantation

Population pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine A in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: A systematic review

Cyclosporine A (CsA) is the prevalent immunosuppressive drug for preventing and treating graft-versus-host disease after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in both children and adults. Population pharmacokinetic studies have identified covariates, owing to their large between-subject variability, facilitating individualized therapy. However, no review has summarized CsA's population pharmacokinetics post-HSCT. This systematic review aims to synthesize population pharmacokinetic studies of CsA therapy in HSCT recipients and explore influencing covariates. Thirteen studies, comprising five involving children, one involving both children and adults and seven involving adults, were included. The median apparent clearance in children surpassed that in adults, influenced notably by hematocrit level and body. While liver function impacted clearance, the effect was insignificant. Co-administration with cytochrome P450 enzyme inhibitors (e.g., fluconazole (Diflucan) or itraconazole) decreased drug clearance, whereas inducers (e.g., rifampicin or rifapentine) increased it. Area under the curve analysis is recommended over trough concentration-based monitoring for HSCT recipients on CsA. In cases of insufficient trough concentration, additional sampling points are recommended for improved area under the curve estimation. Further studies are needed to evaluate the optimal sampling points required for the area under the curve estimation in CsA therapy post-HSCT.

Effect of Wuzhi capsules on cyclosporine A concentration in children with aplastic anemia immunotherapy: a single-center observational study

OBJECTIVE

This research aimed to assess the effect of Wuzhi capsules (WZC) on the blood concentration of cyclosporine A (CsA) in renal aplastic anemia recipients.

METHODS

: This observational study was carried out at the Hematology Oncology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital between November 2019 and February 2020. A total of 102 Chinese AA recipients receiving CsA (6mg/kg/d) with or without WZC were included in this study. Baseline data, such as age, therapeutic drug monitoring data, and follow-up information were collected. The promotion concentration of CsA was calculated, and the pharmaceutical economics evaluation with combination of two drugs was also carried out.

RESULTS

: Dose- and body weight-adjusted trough concentrations (C₀/D/W) of CsA in the WZC group were found to be significantly higher than that in the non-WZC group (P<0.01). The average C₀ of CsA increased by (63.27±45.81) ng/mL. The incidence of adverse events was also not statistically significant between the two groups (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

:WZC can increase CsA concentration without increasing adverse drug reactions. Efficient and convenient immunosuppressive effects on AA recipients can be achieved via immunosuppressant therapy in combination with WZC.

Population pharmacokinetics of ciclosporin in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: C-reactive protein as a novel covariate for clearance

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVES

Ciclosporin (CsA), a potent immunosuppressive agent used to prevent graft-versus-host disease in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) recipients, is characterized by large inter-individual variability and a narrow therapeutic range. The aim of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model for CsA in Chinese allo-HSCT recipients and to identify covariates influencing CsA pharmacokinetics.

METHODS

A total of 758 retrospective drug monitoring data points were collected after intravenous infusion or oral administration of CsA from 59 patients. Population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using nonlinear mixed effects modelling expressed by differential equations. Monte Carlo simulation was applied to optimize dosage regimens. The final model was validated using bootstrap and normalized prediction distribution errors.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The results showed that the daily CsA dose, haematocrit, total bile acid, C-reactive protein (CRP) and co-administration of triazole antifungal agent were identified as significant covariates for clearance (CL) of CsA. The typical value of CL was 19.8 L/h with an inter-individual variability of 13.1%. The volume of distribution was 1340 L. Bioavailability was 67.2% with an inter-individual variability of 8.5%. Dosing simulation based on the developed model indicated that patients with high CRP concentration required a higher daily dose to attain the therapeutic trough concentration. The influence of CRP ultimately on the therapy outcome of CsA is not clear, which needs further study.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

CRP concentration was identified as a novel marker associated with CsA pharmacokinetics, which should be considered when determining the appropriate dosage of CsA in allo-HSCT recipients.

A Clinical Decision Support Tool to Find the Best Initial Intravenous Cyclosporine Regimen in Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

To optimize cyclosporine A (CsA) dosing regimen in pediatric patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), we aimed to provide clinicians with a validated decision support tool for determining the most suitable first dose of intravenous CsA. We used a 10-year monocentric data set of pediatric patients undergoing HSCT. Discretization of all variables was performed according to literature or thanks to algorithms using Shannon entropy (from information theory) or equal width intervals. The first 8 years were used to build the Bayesian network model. This model underwent a 10-fold cross-validation, and then a prospective validation with data of the last 2 years. There were 3.3% and 4.1% of missing values in the training and the validation data set, respectively. After prospective validation, the Tree-Augmented Naïve Bayesian network shows interesting prediction performances with an average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.804, 32.8% of misclassified patients, a true-positive rate of 0.672, and a false-positive rate of 0.285. This validated model allows good predictions to propose an optimized and personalized initial CsA dose for pediatric patients undergoing HSCT. The clinical impact of its use should be further evaluated.

A decision support tool to find the best cyclosporine dose when switching from intravenous to oral route in pediatric stem cell transplant patients

PURPOSE

Managing the pharmacokinetic variability of immunosuppressive drugs after pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a clinical challenge. Thus, the aim of our study was to design and validate a decision support tool predicting the best first cyclosporine oral dose to give when switching from intravenous route.

METHODS

We used 10-years pediatric HSCT patients' dataset from 2008 to 2018. A tree-augmented naïve Bayesian network model (method belonging to artificial intelligence) was built with data from the first eight-years, and validated with data from the last two.

RESULTS

The Bayesian network model obtained showed good prediction performances, both after a 10-fold cross-validation and external validation, with respectively an AUC-ROC of 0.89 and 0.86, a percentage of misclassified patients of 28.7% and 35.2%, a true positive rate of 0.71 and 0.65, and a false positive rate of 0.12 and 0.14 respectively.

CONCLUSION

The final model allows the prediction of the most likely cyclosporine oral dose to reach the therapeutic target specified by the clinician. The clinical impact of using this model needs to be prospectively warranted. Respecting the decision support tool terms of use is necessary as well as remaining critical about the prediction by confronting it with the clinical context.

The Pharmacokinetic Prediction of Cyclosporin A after Coadministration with Wuzhi Capsule

We aim to describe the influence of principal ingredients of Wuzhi capsule, schisandrin A (SIA) and schisantherin A (STA), on the pharmacokinetics of cyclosporin A (CsA) and to quantify the herb-drug interactions (HDIs) between SIA, STA, and CsA. CsA is a first-line immunosuppressant for anti-rejection therapy after solid organ transplantation, while narrow therapeutic window associated with strong hepatotoxicity largely limited its use. Wuzhi capsule, a liver-protective drug, was approved for coadministration with CsA to reduce the hepatotoxicity. There are few studies exploring HDIs of CsA when coadministered with Wuzhi capsule. The essential adjusted physicochemical data and pharmacokinetic parameters of SIA, STA, and CsA were collected. Then physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models of SIA, STA, and CsA were built and verified in healthy subjects using Simcyp respectively. The refined PBPK models were used to estimate potential HDIs between CsA and SIA, STA. The simulated plasma concentration-time curves of CsA, SIA, and STA were in good accordance with the observed profiles respectively. CsA pharmacokinetics were improved after coadministration. After a single dose and multiple doses, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of CsA was increased by 47% and 226% when coadministered with STA, respectively, and by 8% and 36% when coadministered with SIA, respectively. PBPK models sufficiently described the pharmacokinetics of CsA, SIA, and STA. Compared with SIA, STA inhibited CsA metabolism to a greater extent. Our result revealed the dose of CsA can be reduced to maintain similar profile when used concomitantly with Wuzhi capsule.

The nested enzyme-within-enterocyte (NEWE) turnover model for predicting dynamic drug and disease effects on the gut wall

Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models provide a framework for in vitro-in vivo extrapolation of metabolic drug clearance. Many of the concepts in PBPK can have consequential impact on more mechanistic systems pharmacology models. In the gut wall, turnover of enzymes and enterocytes are typically lumped into one rate constant that describes the time dependent enzyme activity. This assumption may influence predictability of any sustained and dynamic effects such as mechanism-based inhibition (MBI), particularly when considering translation from healthy to gut disease. A novel multi-level systems PBPK model was developed. This model comprised a 'nested enzyme-within enterocyte' (NEWE) turnover model to describe levels of drug-metabolising enzymes. The ability of the model to predict gut metabolism following MBI and gut disease was investigated and compared to the conventional modelling approach. For MBI, the default NEWE model performed comparably to the conventional model. However, when drug-specific spatial crypt-villous absorption was considered, up to approximately 50% lower impact of MBI was simulated for substrates highly metabolised by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, interacting with potent inhibitors. Further, the model showed potential in predicting the disease effect of gastrointestinal mucositis and untreated coeliac disease when compared to indirect clinical pharmacokinetic parameters. Considering the added complexity of the NEWE model, it does not provide an attractive solution for improving upon MBI predictions in healthy individuals. However, nesting turnover may enable extrapolation to gut disease-drug interactions. The principle detailed herein may be useful for modelling drug interactions with cellular targets where turnover is significant enough to affect this process.

Bayesian Networks: A New Approach to Predict Therapeutic Range Achievement of Initial Cyclosporine Blood Concentration After Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) allows the treatment of numerous diseases, both malignant and non-malignant. Cyclosporine, a narrow therapeutic index drug, is the major immunosuppressant used to prevent graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), but may also cause severe adverse effects in case of overdosing.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to predict the initial cyclosporine residual blood concentration value after pediatric HSCT, and consequently the dose necessary to reach the therapeutic range, using a mathematical individual predictive model.

METHODS

Clinical and biological data collected from the graft infusion for 2 months after transplantation in 155 pediatric patients undergoing HSCT between 2008 and 2016 were used to generate synthetic data for 1000 subjects which were used to build a Bayesian network model. We compared the characteristics and sensitivity to clinical or biological missing data of this model with four other methods.

RESULTS

The tree-augmented Naïve Bayesian network showed the best characteristics, with no missing data (area under the curve of the receiving operator characteristics curve [AUC-ROC] of 0.89 ± 0.02), 18.9 ± 2.6% of patients misclassified, and positive and negative predictive values of 85.9 ± 3.4% and 74.2 ± 5.1%, respectively, and this trend is found in the synthetic dataset from no to 10% missing data. The most relevant variables that could influence whether the initial residual cyclosporine concentration is in the therapeutic range are the last dose before measurement and the mean dose before measurement.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed and cross-validated an online Bayesian network to predict the first cyclosporine concentration after pediatric HSCT. This model allows simulation of different dosing regimens, and enables the best dosing regimen to reach the therapeutic range immediately after transplantation to be found, minimizing the risk of adverse effects and GVHD occurrence.

Converting cyclosporine A from intravenous to oral administration in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients and the role of azole antifungals

PURPOSE

Cyclosporine A (CsA) is the most widely used immunosuppressive agent after a hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Although recommendations for CsA dose conversion from intravenous to oral administration differ from 1:1 to 1:3, most studies did not consider the role of azole antifungals as an important confounder. Therefore, we assess the optimal conversion rate of CsA from intravenous to oral administration in HSCT recipients, taking into account the concomitant use of azole antifungals.

METHODS

We retrospectively included patients from a large database of 483 patients who underwent a HSCT and received intravenous CsA as part of the conditioning regimen and peritransplant immunosuppression. All patients were converted from intravenous to oral administration in a 1:1 conversion rate. We collected for each patient three CsA trough concentrations during intravenous and oral administration, directly before and after conversion to oral administration.

RESULTS

We included 71 patients; 50 patients co-treated with fluconazole, 10 with voriconazole, and 11 without azole co-medication. In patients with voriconazole, the dose-corrected CsA concentration (CsA concentration divided by CsA dosage) was not different between intravenous and oral administration (2.6% difference, p = 0.754), suggesting a CsA oral bioavailability of nearly 100%. In patients with fluconazole and without azole co-medication, the dose-corrected CsA concentration was respectively 21.5% (p < 0.001) and 25.2% (p = 0.069) lower during oral administration.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with voriconazole, CsA should be converted 1:1 from intravenous to oral administration. In patients with fluconazole and without azole co-medication, a 1:1.3 substitution is advised to prevent subtherapeutic CsA concentrations.

Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacogenomics of Immunosuppressants in Allogeneic Haematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Part I

Although immunosuppressive treatments and target concentration intervention (TCI) have significantly contributed to the success of allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT), there is currently no consensus on the best immunosuppressive strategies. Compared with solid organ transplantation, alloHCT is unique because of the potential for bidirectional reactions (i.e. host-versus-graft and graft-versus-host). Postgraft immunosuppression typically includes a calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporine or tacrolimus) and a short course of methotrexate after high-dose myeloablative conditioning, or a calcineurin inhibitor and mycophenolate mofetil after reduced-intensity conditioning. There are evolving roles for the antithymyocyte globulins (ATGs) and sirolimus as postgraft immunosuppression. A review of the pharmacokinetics and TCI of the main postgraft immunosuppressants is presented in this two-part review. All immunosuppressants are characterized by large intra- and interindividual pharmacokinetic variability and by narrow therapeutic indices. It is essential to understand immunosuppressants' pharmacokinetic properties and how to use them for individualized treatment incorporating TCI to improve outcomes. TCI, which is mandatory for the calcineurin inhibitors and sirolimus, has become an integral part of postgraft immunosuppression. TCI is usually based on trough concentration monitoring, but other approaches include measurement of the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) over the dosing interval or limited sampling schedules with maximum a posteriori Bayesian personalization approaches. Interpretation of pharmacodynamic results is hindered by the prevalence of studies enrolling only a small number of patients, variability in the allogeneic graft source and variability in postgraft immunosuppression. Given the curative potential of alloHCT, the pharmacodynamics of these immunosuppressants deserves to be explored in depth. Development of sophisticated systems pharmacology models and improved TCI tools are needed to accurately evaluate patients' exposure to drugs in general and to immunosuppressants in particular. Sequential studies, first without and then with TCI, should be conducted to validate the clinical benefit of TCI in homogenous populations; randomized trials are not feasible, because there are higher-priority research questions in alloHCT. In Part I of this article, we review the alloHCT process to facilitate optimal design of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics studies. We also review the pharmacokinetics and TCI of calcineurin inhibitors and methotrexate.

Limited sampling strategies for estimating intravenous and oral cyclosporine area under the curve in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

The optimal monitoring strategy for cyclosporine (CsA) in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) patients remains unclear. Although there is a growing interest in the use of the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), measurement of AUC in clinical settings is often impractical. The objective of this study was to identify and validate limited sampling strategies (LSSs) for the prediction of CsA AUC after intravenous (IV) and oral (PO) administration in this population.

METHODS

Sixty-eight pediatric patients who underwent HSCT and received CsA were investigated. Twelve-hour pharmacokinetic profiles (n = 138) performed per standard of care were collected. Weighted multiple linear regression was used to investigate all possible LSSs consisting of 4 or less concentration-time points. Their predictive performance was evaluated by leave one out cross validation and external validation by measuring the root mean squared relative error (RMSE%) and the 95th percentile of the absolute relative error (AE%). Values less than 20% were considered clinically acceptable.

RESULTS

Nine LSSs (4 IV and 5 PO) convenient for clinical application proved to have clinically acceptable performance. Notably, LSS based on C0, C2, and C4 was found to be accurate for estimation of CsA exposure after both IV and PO administration with the 95th percentile of AE% of 19.7% and 17.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

LSSs using 3 or 4 concentration-time points obtained within 4 hours postdose provide a convenient and reliable method to estimate CsA exposure in this population. These LSSs may facilitate future research aiming at better defining the relationship between AUC and clinical outcomes.

Pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine a conversion from twice-daily infusion to oral administration in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Twice-daily administration of cyclosporine A (CyA) has often been used for prophylaxis of acute graft versus host disease in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). But there have not been any reports that calculated the conversion ratio of the switch from twice-daily intravenous infusion to oral administration of CyA in adult patients. To establish the conversion ratio and the best strategy of twice-daily administration of CyA, the authors investigated the serial changes in the blood CyA concentration during the switch from twice-daily intravenous infusion to oral administration while maintaining high-peak concentration (over 1000 ng/mL) and calculated the bioavailability of Neoral, a micro emulsion cyclosporine, in 11 patients. All the patients underwent allo-HSCT with graft versus host disease prophylaxis consisting of CyA at a high-peak concentration of twice-daily infusion with short-term methotrexate and oral administration. Neoral was started at an oral dose, 2 times daily, at twice the latest dose of intravenous dose according to the bioavailability of healthy volunteers. Micafungin, a mild inhibitor of CYP3A4, was administered for prophylaxis against fungal infection. The total area under the concentration-time curve during oral administration (AUCpo) was nearly the same as AUC during intravenous infusion (AUCiv) (mean ± SD, 7206 ± 1557 ng·h·mL and 7783 ± 897.7 ng·h·mL, respectively). The bioavailability of Neoral, defined as F = AUCpo × DOSEiv/AUCiv × DOSEpo was 0.58 ± 0.15 (mean ± SD, range: 0.41-0.94). When patients were switched from twice-daily infusion to oral administration, the dose conversion ratio of 1:2 seemed to be appropriate. At that time, the target trough level of Neoral was nearly the same as that of the infusion.

Cyclosporine use in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: pharmacokinetic approach

Cyclosporine is one of the most vital agents in the process of successful allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Despite a long history and worldwide extent of cyclosporine use for prevention of graft versus host disease, currently there are lots of uncertainties about its optimal method of application to reach the best clinical outcome. A major portion of this problem stems from complicated cyclosporine pharmacokinetics. Study of cyclosporine pharmacokinetic behavior can significantly help recognition of its effectiveness and consequently, optimization of dosing, administration, monitoring and management of adverse effects. In this review, highly accredited but sparse scientific data are gathered in order to provide a better insight for preparation of practice guidelines and directing future studies for allogeneic hematopoietic cell recipients.

Population pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine in hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients: consideration of genetic polymorphisms

BACKGROUND

Cyclosporine (CsA), which is used for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT), has a narrow therapeutic range and large interindividual and intraindividual pharmacokinetic variability. Nevertheless, population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) studies of CsA in allo-HSCT are scarce.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of our study was to build a PopPK model of CsA in allo-HSCT in consideration of demographic, clinical, and genetic polymorphisms data.

METHODS

A total of 34 adult allo-HSCT patients who received CsA were enrolled prospectively. Demographic, clinical, and CYP3A5 *1/*3, CYP2C19 *1/*2/*3, ABCB1 3435C>T, 1236C>T, 2677G>T/A, ABCC2 -24C>T, 1249G>A, VDR Bsml, Apal polymorphisms data were collected. A PopPK modeling was conducted with NONMEM program.

RESULTS

A 1-compartment model with a 2-transit absorption compartment model was developed. After the stepwise covariate model building process, weight was incorporated into clearance (CL) as a power function model with the exponent value of 0.419. The final typical estimate of CL was 21.2 L/h; volume of distribution was 430 L; logit-transformed bioavailability was 1.49 (bioavailability: 81%); and transit compartment rate was 2.87/h. None of the genetic polymorphisms in CYP3A5, CYP2C19, ABCB1, ABCC2, and VDR were significant covariates in the pharmacokinetics of CsA.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, it was observed that weight had a significant effect on CL. Genetic polymorphisms did not affect CsA pharmacokinetics. Prospective studies with a larger number of participants is needed to validate the results of this study.

Bayesian approach for the estimation of cyclosporine area under the curve using limited sampling strategies in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

The optimal marker for cyclosporine (CsA) monitoring in transplantation patients remains controversial. However, there is a growing interest in the use of the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), particularly for cyclosporine dose adjustment in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In this paper, we develop Bayesian limited sampling strategies (B-LSS) for cyclosporine AUC estimation using population pharmacokinetic (Pop-PK) models and investigate related issues, with the aim to improve B-LSS prediction performance.

METHODS

Twenty five pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients receiving intravenous and oral cyclosporine were investigated. Pop-PK analyses were carried out and the predictive performance of B-LSS was evaluated using the final Pop-PK model and several related ones. The performance of B-LSS when targeting different versions of AUC was also discussed.

RESULTS

A two-compartment structure model with a lag time and a combined additive and proportional error is retained. The final covariate model does not improve the B-LSS prediction performance. The best performing models for intravenous and oral cyclosporine are the structure ones with combined and additive error, respectively. Twelve B-LSS, consisting of 4 or less sampling points obtained within 4 hours post-dose, predict AUC with 95th percentile of the absolute values of relative prediction errors of 20% or less. Moreover, B-LSS perform better for the prediction of the 'underlying' AUC derived from the Pop-PK model estimated concentrations that exclude the residual errors, in comparison to their prediction of the observed AUC directly calculated using measured concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

B-LSS can adequately estimate cyclosporine AUC. However, B-LSS performance is not perfectly in line with the standard Pop-PK model selection criteria; hence the final model might not be ideal for AUC prediction purpose. Therefore, for B-LSS application, Pop-PK model diagnostic criteria should additionally account for AUC prediction errors.

Population pharmacokinetics of ciclosporin in haematopoietic allogeneic stem cell transplantation with emphasis on limited sampling strategy

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT • The population pharmacokinetics and limited sampling strategies for ciclosporin monitoring have been extensively studied in renal and liver transplant recipients. Little is known about the pharmacokinetics of ciclosporin in patients undergoing haematopoietic allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). • It is anticipated that there is a difference in pharmacokinetics in patients after kidney or liver transplantation compared with patients undergoing stem cell transplantation, because of mucositis and interacting drugs (e.g. fluconazole). • Data on the pharmacokinetics of ciclosporin and the relationship between its systemic exposure, as reflected by the area under the curve (AUC), and the biological effect as graft vs. host-disease (GVHD) prophylaxis and graft vs. tumour (GVT) response are scarce in patients after HSCT. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS • A pharmacokinetic model was developed for orally and intravenously administered ciclosporin, enabling an adequate estimate of the systemic exposure of ciclosporin in patients after HSCT. A limited sampling strategy was tested that may serve as a tool to study the optimum systemic exposure (AUC) of ciclosporin in HSCT to prevent GVHD but establish adequate GVT response and to guide therapeutic drug monitoring. AIM To develop a population pharmacokinetic model of ciclosporin (CsA) in haematopoietic allogeneic stem cell transplantation to facilitate a limited sampling strategy to determine systemic exposure (area under the curve [AUC]), in order to optimize CsA therapy in this patient population. METHODS The pharmacokinetics of CsA were investigated prospectively in 20 patients following allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). CsA was given twice daily, as a 3 h i.v. infusion starting at day 1 of the conditioning scheme, and orally later on, when oral intake was well tolerated. Fluconazole was given as antimycotic prophylaxis. Pharmacokinetic parameter estimation was performed using nonlinear mixed effect modelling as implemented in the NONMEM program. A first order absorption model with lag time was compared with Erlang frequency distribution and Weibull distribution models. The influence of demographic variables on the individual empirical Bayesian estimates of clearance and distribution volume was tested. Subsequently two limited sampling strategies (LSS) were evaluated: posterior Bayesian fitting and limited sampling equations. RESULTS Twenty patients were included and 435 samples were collected after i.v. and oral administration of CsA. A two compartment model with first order absorption best described the data. Clearance (CL) was 21.9 l h(-1) (relative standard deviation [RSD]± 5.2%) with an inter-individual variability of 21%. The central volume of distribution (V(c) ) was 18.3 l (RSD ± 8.7%) with an inter-individual variability of 29%. Bioavailability (F) was 0.71 (RSD ± 9.9%) with and inter-individual variability of 25% and lag time (t(lag) ) was 0.44 h (RSD 5.5%). Weight, body surface area, haematocrit, albumin, ALAT and ASAT had no significant influence on pharmacokinetic parameters. The best multiple point combination for posterior Bayesian fitting, in terms of estimating systemic CsA exposure, appeared to be C0 + C2 + C3. Two selected LSS two time point equations and all selected three and four time point equations predicted de all AUC(0,12 h) within 15% bias and prediction. CONCLUSIONS The i.v. and oralcurves were best described with a two compartment model with first-order absorption with lag time. With the Bayesian estimators from this model, the area under the concentration-time curve in HSCT patients taking fluconazole can be estimated with only three blood samples (0, 2, 3 h) with a bias of 1% and precision of 4%.

Estimation of Abbreviated Cyclosporine A Area under the Concentration-Time Curve in Allogenic Stem Cell Transplantation after Oral Administration

Measurements of Cyclosporine (CsA) systemic exposure permit its dose adjustment in allogenic stem cell transplantation recipients to prevent graft-versus-host disease. CsA LSSs were developed and validated from 60 ASCT patients via multiple linear regressions. All whole-blood samples were analyzed by fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA-Axym). The 10 models that have used CsA concentrations at a single time point did not have a good fit with AUC_0–12 (R² < 0.90). C₂ and C₄ were the time points that correlated best with AUC_0–12 h, R² were respectively 0.848, and 0.897. The LSS equation with the best predictive performance (bias, precision and number of samples) utilized three sampling concentrations was AUC_0–12 h = 0.607 + 1.569 × C_0.5 + 2.098 × C₂ + 3.603 × C₄ (R² = 0.943). Optimal LSSs equations which limited to those utilizing three timed concentrations taken within 4 hours post-dose developed from ASCT recipient's patients yielded a low bias <5% ranged from 1.27% to 2.68% and good precision <15% ranged from 9.60% and 11.02%. We propose an LSS model with equation AUC_0–12 h = 0.82 + 2.766 × C₂ + 3.409 × C₄ for a practical reason. Bias and precision for this model are respectively 2.68% and 11.02%.

Ciclosporin kinetics in children after stem cell transplantation

AIMS

To develop a limited sampling strategy to determine ciclosporin systemic exposure [area-under-the-curve(AUC)]. This is meant to be the first step in a future study of the relationship between AUC and the biological effects of ciclosporin.

METHODS

The pharmacokinetics of ciclosporin was investigated prospectively following stem cell transplantation (SCT) in 17 children, aged 1.8-16.1 years. Ciclosporin was given twice daily, intravenously over a short infusion of 2 h duration during the early post-SCT period, or orally later on, when oral medication was well tolerated. Parameter estimation was performed using nonlinear mixed effect modelling as implemented in the NONMEM program. Individual empirical Bayes estimates of clearance and distribution volume were correlated with the demographic variables.

RESULTS

Pharmacokinetics was described adequately with a two-compartment model with lag time (population estimates: CL = 11.3 l h(-1); V(c) = 16.5 l; V(p) = 59.9 l; t(1/2) absorption = 0.78 h, t(lag) = 0.6 h). The AUCs, determined for the combination of trough level with one time point between 2 and 3 h after dosing, correlated very well with the reference AUC (r(2) = 0.97). No correlation was found between clearance and distribution volume, and the demographic patient variables length, body weight, age and glomerular filtration rate.

CONCLUSION

A two-point limited sampling strategy, in combination with a Bayesian fitting procedure using the pharmacokinetic population model described, can adequately determine the AUC of ciclosporin. Since no correlation between clearance and body weight was found, dosing ciclosporin per kg bodyweight is not supported by the results of this study. We suggest starting with a fixed dose, followed by AUC determination and dose adjustment.

Disposition of two oral formulations of cyclosporine in pediatric patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplants

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To compare the disposition of cyclosporine after the administration of two oral formulations to children undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and to evaluate the relationship between whole blood cyclosporine concentrations during the dosing interval and the area under the whole blood concentration-time curve.

DESIGN

Prospective, descriptive, crossover study.Setting. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation unit in a tertiary-quaternary university-affiliated pediatric hospital.

PATIENTS

Twenty-four pediatric patients aged 0.5-16.9 years undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

INTERVENTION

The modified oral formulation of cyclosporine was given on the first day (divided as two doses), and a single identical dose of the original oral formulation was given on the morning of the second day.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Blood samples were obtained at 0, 0.5, 1.25, 2, 4, 6, 9, and 12 hours after the morning dose from the lumen of the central venous catheter not previously used for intravenous cyclosporine administration. Cyclosporine concentration-time data were analyzed by using noncompartmental methods. Mean +/- SD maximum concentrations were significantly higher after administration of the modified form than after administration of the original form (594.9 +/- 349.7 vs 483.0 +/- 363.0 microg/L, p=0.003), as was the area under the concentration-time curve from 0-12 hours (AUC0-12; 3432 +/- 1563 vs 3144 +/- 1780 microg/L x hr, p=0.022). For both formulations, cyclosporine concentrations at 4 hours after administration were most strongly correlated with the AUC0-12. Unlike that of the original formulation, the trough cyclosporine concentration of the modified form had the weakest relationship with AUC (Spearman rho coefficient 0.584, p=0.003).

CONCLUSION

Cyclosporine absorption is lower in children undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation than in children receiving solid organ transplants. Dosage adjustment for the modified formulation based on trough concentration may not be appropriate because its relationship with the AUC was weak. The link between pharmacokinetic parameters and clinical outcomes, such as graft-versus-host disease, must be further studied.

Single-dose daily infusion of cyclosporine for prevention of Graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation from HLA allele-matched, unrelated donors

Peak blood concentration of cyclosporine (CsA) in renal transplantation patients was recently reported to be associated with clinical efficacy. We therefore evaluated the toxicity and efficacy of a regimen of once-daily infusion of CsA plus a short course of methotrexate as prophylaxis of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation from an HLA allele-matched, unrelated donor. Nineteen patients with hematologic malignancies received CsA, 3 mg/kg per day, as a 4-hour intravenous (IV) infusion from day -1. After engraftment, patients received CsA orally at twice the IV dose. The CsA dose was adjusted to maintain the blood trough level between 150 and 200 ng/mL. Methotrexate was administered IV at doses of 10 mg/m(2) on day 1 and 7 mg/m(2) on days 3, 6, and 11. Bone marrow engraftment occurred in all patients. Grade 1 and grade 2 GVHD occurred in 6 (31.6%) and 7 (36.8%) of the 19 patients, respectively. No patient had grade 3 or 4 GVHD. Acute nephrotoxicity developed in 1 (5.3%) of the 19 patients, and hypertension developed in 3 (15.8%) of the 19 patients. We evaluated the pharmacokinetics of 4-hour CsA infusion in 10 patients. The mean trough concentration, mean peak concentration, mean time to peak concentration, and area under the curve (24 hours) were 161 +/- 43 ng/mL, 1498 +/- 387 ng/mL, 3.2 +/- 1.0 hours, and 10,848 +/- 1,991 ng +/- h/mL, respectively. This regimen was well tolerated and did not enhance the risk of severe GVHD in patients undergoing allogeneic bone marrow transplantation from an HLA allele-matched, unrelated donor.

Assessment of converting from intravenous to oral administration of cyclosporin A in pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients

We studied the administration method during a transition period from continuous intravenous (i.v.) infusion to oral administration of cyclosporin A (CsA). Thirty-two pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients, between the ages of 8 months and 15.6 years (median 7.1 years) participated in this study. The pharmacokinetic properties of CsA was evaluated during the transition period from i.v. to oral CsA. The daily oral dose of CsA was three times higher than the i.v. dose. Oral dosing began immediately after the continuous infusion was discontinued. Whole-blood CsA concentrations were measured by a monoclonal fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA). The mean+/-s.d. value of bioavailability (F), maximum concentration (C(max)), half-life (t(1/2)) of CsA were 43.1+/-14.4%, 1135.3+/-340.6 ng/ml and 3.1+/-1.2 h, respectively. Mean clearance (CL)+/-s.d. was 480.9+/-103.7, 414.9+/-137.1 and 320+/-51.8 ml/h/kg in patients <20, 20-40 and >40 kg of body weight, respectively. The CsA CL of younger children was significantly greater than for older children (P=0.044). CsA trough levels were maintained within the therapeutic range throughout the transition period. Therefore, our findings suggest that the immediate administration of an oral formulation, after discontinuation of the continuous infusion, would be practical and effective for routine clinical use.

Inhibition of ex vivo-expanded cytotoxic T-lymphocyte function by high-dose cyclosporine

BACKGROUND

Donor-derived, ex vivo-expanded cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) can provide stem-cell transplantation (SCT) patients with a renewed capacity for virus-specific immune surveillance. Because SCT patients are often treated with cyclosporine (CsA), we questioned whether ex vivo-expanded CTL were susceptible to inhibition by this immunosuppressive drug.

METHODS

Human Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-specific CTL were established by cultivating T cells for at least 5 weeks with interleukin (IL)-2 and irradiated, autologous EBV-transformed B-lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCL). In some cases, CsA was added during the last week of T-cell expansion. Effectors were then tested for cytotoxicity toward their targets in a chromium-release assay or by coculture with viable, unlabeled targets, in the presence or absence of CsA. Alloreactive CTL were similarly expanded and tested against major histocompatibility complex-mismatched stimulator cells.

RESULTS

CsA had a marginal effect on CTL function when added at concentrations greater than or equal to 250 ng/mL during the 4- to 6-hour chromium release assay. However, exposure of CTL to CsA for 1 week before assay reduced lytic function significantly. When the CTL lines were cocultured with viable targets in the presence of CsA, effectors were unable to eliminate their targets, which ultimately dominated the culture.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest that the activity of ex vivo-expanded CTL may be significantly compromised in the presence of high-dose CsA in vivo, particularly if CTL are administered for the purpose of long-term virus-specific immune surveillance.

Cyclosporin: an updated review of the pharmacokinetic properties, clinical efficacy and tolerability of a microemulsion-based formulation (neoral)1 in organ transplantation

Cyclosporin is a lipophilic cyclic polypeptide immunosuppressant that interferes with the activity of T cells chiefly via calcineurin inhibition. The original oil-based oral formulation of this drug (Sandimmun)l was characterised by high intra- and interpatient pharmacokinetic variability, with poor bioavailability in many patients; a novel microemulsion formulation (Neoral)1 was therefore developed to circumvent these problems. Studies show increases, attributable chiefly to improved absorption in patients who absorb the drug only poorly from the original formulation, in mean systemic exposure to cyclosporin with the microemulsion, with no clinically significant differences in tolerability or drug interaction profiles. Cyclosporin microemulsion is at least as effective as the oil-based formulation in renal, liver and heart transplant recipients, with trends towards decreased incidence of acute rejection with the microemulsion formulation in some (statistically significant in a few) trials. Cyclosporin microemulsion and tacrolimus appear to have similar efficacy in preventing acute rejection episodes in most renal, pancreas-kidney, liver and heart transplant recipients. However, there are indications of superior efficacy for tacrolimus in some trials, particularly in the prevention of severe acute rejection and in Black transplant recipients. Current 12-month data also indicate equivalent efficacy of sirolimus in renal transplantation. Conversion from the oil-based to microemulsion formulation in stable renal, liver and heart transplant recipients is achievable with no change in acute rejection rates. The addition of an anti-interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibody and/or mycophenolate mofetil to cyclosporin microemulsion plus corticosteroids decreases rates of acute rejection; corticosteroid withdrawal without increased acute rejection rates was also achieved on the addition of these agents in some trials. Pharmacoeconomic analyses have shown savings in direct healthcare costs in kidney or liver transplantation when cyclosporin microemulsion is used in preference to the oil-based formulation, although studies incorporating indirect costs or expressing costs in terms of therapeutic outcomes are currently unavailable.

CONCLUSIONS

The introduction of cyclosporin microemulsion has consolidated the place of the drug as a mainstay of therapy in all types of solid organ transplantation; research into optimisation of outcomes through more effective therapeutic monitoring in patients receiving this formulation is ongoing. Several novel immunosuppressants have been introduced in recent years: further clinical and pharmacoeconomic research will be needed to clarify the relative positioning of these agents, particularly with respect to specific patient groups. Other new drugs (basiliximab/daclizumab and mycophenolate mofetil) offer particular advantages when used in combination with cyclosporin.