Infectious complications in breast cancer patients undergoing peripheral blood stem cell transplantation: a single center retrospective analysis towards outpatient strategy

COVID-19 pandemic: a new cause of unplanned interruption of radiotherapy in breast cancer patients

The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on patients undergoing radiotherapy by comparing the patterns of unplanned radiotherapy interruption before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. We enrolled patients who received their first dose of radiotherapy for breast cancer between January 28 and July 31, 2019 and between January 28, 2020, and July 31, 2020. We compared the radiotherapy interruption patterns in 2019 with those in 2020 to analyze the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on treatment interruption. Between January 28 and July 31, 2019, 287 patients with breast cancer received radiotherapy. Among them, 19 patients (6.6%) experienced treatment interruption; the reasons for treatment interruption were radiotherapy-related side effects (10 patients, 52.6%), other medical reasons (three patients, 15.8%), and personal reasons (six patients, 31.6%). Between January 28 and July 31, 2020, 279 patients with breast cancer received radiotherapy. Among them, 23 patients (8.2%) experienced treatment interruption; the reasons for treatment interruption were radiotherapy-related side effects (eight patients, 35%) and COVID-19 screening clinic-related reasons (six patients, 26.1%). Among the six patients with screening clinic-related causes of radiotherapy interruption, five had asymptomatic fever and one had mild cold-like symptoms. The duration of treatment interruption was longer in patients with screening clinic-related interruptions than in those with interruptions because of other causes (p = 0.019). Multivariate analysis showed that cancer stage and radiotherapy volume did not significantly affect treatment interruption. The radiotherapy of certain patients was suspended despite the lack of a confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis. Precise and systematic criteria for the management of patients with suspected COVID-19 are needed, and the opinion of radiation oncologist in charge of the patient must also be considered.

Differences in Transplant-Related Complications between Hematologic Malignancies and Solid Tumors Receiving High-Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation

Multiple factors contribute to transplant-related complications after high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation, including conditioning regimens, number of infused stem cells and clinical characteristics of patient at transplant. We compared the transplant-related complications of 141 patients affected with hematological malignancies with those of 109 patients with solid tumors. The total number of peripheral blood stem cell transplantations performed was 339. High-dose chemotherapy mainly consisted of melphalan-, busulphan- or thiotepa-based regimens. Despite the equal number of infused CD34+ cells, patients with a hematological malignancy showed a slower absolute neutrophil count (days to neutrophils >0.5 x 109/L, 10.6 ± 3.6 for hematological malignancies versus 9.1 ± 1.2 for solid tumors, P <0.0001) and platelet recovery (days to platelets >20 x 109/L, 16.4 ± 9.8 for hematological malignancies versus 12.3 ± 4.1 for solid tumors, P <0.0001) than patients with a solid tumor. A significantly higher requirement of red blood cell (3.3 ± 4.1 versus 2.0 ± 1.9, P <0.0029) and platelet units (7.5_± 10.4 versus 4.2 ± 3.4, P <0.0001) was observed for hematological malignancies than for solid tumors. Five graft failures were documented exclusively in patients with a hematological malignancy. Moreover, such patients displayed a longer duration of mucositis (P <0.0028) and hospital stay (P <0.0001), but no difference was observed in terms of febrile episodes. Transplant-related mortality was similar between the two groups. In conclusion, patients with a hematological malignancy overall have more complications than those with a solid tumor.

Critical issues on high-dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation in breast cancer patients

INTRODUCTION

High-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation (AHPCT) for high-risk (HR) or metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is no longer an option.

AREAS COVERED

An expert panel including medical oncologists and hematologists produce an opinion paper on the use of HDC and AHPCT in BC patients and they explain why they believe that; despite inconclusive results thus far, this treatment should have an ongoing role in breast cancer management under clinical trials.

EXPERT OPINION

HDC with AHPCT has become a safe treatment modality and an advantage in disease-free survival has been observed in most of the studies with HDC, with the caveat that today, even a limited relapse-free survival and progression-free survival benefit is sufficient for the approval of new antineoplastic agents. Moreover, in HRBC, an overall survival benefit by HDC could be achieved in the HER2-ve and triple-negative populations and, in this setting, HDC with AHPCT represents a therapeutic option that can be proposed to well-informed patients. In MBC, the HDC approach should be investigated further in selected patients with HER2-ve, chemosensitive disease. This paper is not intended to give any conclusion, but rather to open a debate on the value of HDC in HR and MBC.

High-Dose Chemotherapy with Mitoxantrone + Melphalan and Autologous Stem Cell Rescue in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients: A Study of Feasibility and Tolerability

Hematological and extra-hematological toxicity of mitoxantrone-containing regimens with autologous stem cell rescue was evaluated in 32 metastatic breast cancer patients. The schedule was the final part of two high-dose chemotherapy programs, including an induction phase with three courses of conventional chemotherapy with epirubicin (120 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) plus three courses of docetaxel (100 mg/m2) and a first high-dose chemotherapy consisting of cyclophosphamide (6000 mg/m2), thiotepa (500 mg/m2) and carboplatin (800 mg/m2) or melphalan (160 mg/m2) plus thiotepa (600 mg/m2). The final second autograft phase included mitoxantrone (60 mg/m2) associated with melphalan (160 mg/m2) and autologous stem cell rescue infusion. The median duration of severe neutropenia and thrombocytopenia was 9 (range, 7–13) and 11.5 (range, 9–29) days. The median number of units of erythrocytes and platelets transfused was 1 (0–11) and 4 (1–9), respectively. Fever for a median of 2 (0–8) days developed in 71.8% of the patients. Mucositis was observed in 81.2% (WHO grade 3–4 in 25%). No acute or late cardiac toxicity was observed. One patient died because of a transplant-unrelated cause. The response according to the program phase showed an increased rate of complete response, from 12.5% at the end of conventional chemotherapy to 21.9% after the first high-dose chemotherapy course, to increase to 43.9% after the treatment with mitoxantrone-melphalan. We conclude that a conditioning regimen with high dose mitoxantrone-melphalan fits well within the high-dose chemotherapy program.