Fludarabine/melphalan conditioning for allogeneic transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma

Immunotherapy for the treatment of multiple myeloma

Despite advances in treatment for multiple myeloma, the majority of patients ultimately develop relapsed disease marked by immune evasion and resistance to standard therapy. Immunotherapy has emerged as a powerful tool for tumor-directed cytotoxicity with the unique potential to induce immune memory to reduce the risk of relapse. Understanding the specific mechanisms of immune dysregulation and dysfunction in advanced myeloma is critical to the development of further therapies that produce a durable response. Adoptive cellular therapy, most strikingly CAR T cell therapy, has demonstrated dramatic responses in the setting of refractory disease. Understanding the factors that contribute to immune evasion and the mechanisms of response and resistance to therapy will be critical to developing the next generation of adoptive cellular therapies, informing novel combination therapy, and determining the optimal time to incorporate immune therapy in the treatment of myeloma.

Total marrow irradiation (TMI): Addressing an unmet need in hematopoietic cell transplantation - a single institution experience review

Purpose

TMI utilizes IMRT to deliver organ sparing targeted radiotherapy in patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). TMI addresses an unmet need, specifically patients with refractory or relapsed (R/R) hematologic malignancies who have poor outcomes with standard HCT regimens and where attempts to improve outcomes by adding or dose escalating TBI are not possible due to increased toxicities. Over 500 patients have received TMI at this center. This review summarizes this experience including planning and delivery, clinical results, and future directions.

Methods

Patients were treated on prospective allogeneic HCT trials using helical tomographic or VMAT IMRT delivery. Target structures included the bone/marrow only (TMI), or the addition of lymph nodes, and spleen (total marrow and lymphoid irradiation, TMLI). Total dose ranged from 12 to 20 Gy at 1.5-2.0 Gy fractions twice daily.

Results

Trials demonstrate engraftment in all patients and a low incidence of radiation related toxicities and extramedullary relapses. In R/R acute leukemia TMLI 20 Gy, etoposide, and cyclophosphamide (Cy) results in a 1-year non-relapse mortality (NRM) rate of 6% and 2-year overall survival (OS) of 48%; TMLI 12 Gy added to fludarabine (flu) and melphalan (mel) in older patients (≥ 60 years old) results in a NRM rate of 33% comparable to flu/mel alone, and 5-year OS of 42%; and TMLI 20 Gy/flu/Cy and post-transplant Cy (PTCy) in haplo-identical HCT results in a 2-year NRM rate of 13% and 1-year OS of 83%. In AML in complete remission, TMLI 20 Gy and PTCy results in 2-year NRM, OS, and GVHD free/relapse-free survival (GRFS) rates of 0%, 86·7%, and 59.3%, respectively.

Conclusion

TMI/TMLI shows significant promise, low NRM rates, the ability to offer myeloablative radiation containing regimens to older patients, the ability to dose escalate, and response and survival rates that compare favorably to published results. Collaboration between radiation oncology and hematology is key to successful implementation. TMI/TMLI represents a paradigm shift from TBI towards novel strategies to integrate a safer and more effective target-specific radiation therapy into HCT conditioning beyond what is possible with TBI and will help expand and redefine the role of radiotherapy in HCT.

Organ sparing total marrow irradiation compared to total body irradiation prior to allogeneic stem cell transplantation

OBJECTIVES

Total body irradiation (TBI) is commonly used prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in myeloablative conditioning regimens. However, TBI may be replaced by total marrow irradiation (TMI) at centres with access to Helical TomoTherapy, a modality that has the advantage of delivering intensity-modulated radiotherapy to long targets such as the entire bone marrow compartment. Toxicity after organ sparing TMI prior to HSCT has not previously been reported compared to TBI or with regard to engraftment data.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational study on 37 patients that received organ sparing TMI prior to HSCT and compared this cohort to retrospective data on 33 patients that received TBI prior to HSCT.

RESULTS

The 1-year graft-versus-host disease-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) was 67.5% for all patients treated with TMI and 80.5% for patients with matched unrelated donor and treated with TMI, which was a significant difference from historical data on TBI patients with a hazard ratio of 0.45 (P = .03) and 0.24 (P < .01). Engraftment with a platelet count over 20 [K/µL] and 50 [K/µL] was significantly shorter for the TMI group, and neutrophil recovery was satisfactory in both treatment cohorts. There was generally a low occurrence of other treatment-related toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite small cohorts, some significant differences were found; TMI as part of the myeloablative conditioning yields a high 1-year GRFS, fast and robust engraftment, and low occurrence of acute toxicity.

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma in the New Drugs Era: A Platform to Cure

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) represents a treatment option for multiple myeloma (MM) patients. As shown in several studies, alloHCT is highly effective, but it is hampered by a high toxicity, mainly related to the graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), a complex immunological reaction ascribable to the donor’s immune system. The morbidity and mortality associated with GVHD can weaken the benefits of this procedure. On the other side, the high therapeutic potential of alloHCT is also related to the donor’s immune system, through immunological activity known as the graft-versus-myeloma effect. Clinical research over the past two decades has sought to enhance the favorable part of this balance, along with the reduction in treatment-related toxicity. Frontline alloHCT showed promising results and a potential for a cure in the past. Currently, thanks to the improved results of first-line therapies and the availability of effective second- or third-line salvage therapies, alloHCT is reserved for selected high-risk patients and is considered a clinical option. For donor lymphocyte infusion, bortezomib or lenalidomide have been used as consolidation or maintenance therapies post-transplant—none has become standard of care. For those patients who relapse, the best treatment should be evaluated considering the patient’s clinical status and the previous lines of therapy. The use of newer drugs, such as monoclonal antibodies or other immunotherapies in the post-transplant setting, deserves further investigation. However, acceptable toxicity and a synergic effect with the newer immune system could be hopefully expected.

Long-Term Follow-up of CALGB (Alliance) 100001: Autologous Followed by Nonmyeloablative Allogeneic Transplant for Multiple Myeloma

CALGB (Alliance) 100001 was a phase II study evaluating autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) followed by nonmyeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT) in patients with multiple myeloma who had received no more than 18 months of prior therapy and had experienced no more than 1 prior progression event. Conditioning for ASCT was with high-dose melphalan (200 mg/m²). The alloSCT reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen consisted of fludarabine (30 mg/m²/d i.v. on days -7 through -3) and cyclophosphamide (1 g/m²/d i.v. on days -4 through -3). The primary objective was to determine the 6-month post-alloSCT treatment-related mortality (TRM) rate. Additional objectives included determining the proportion of patients who could complete this tandem ASCT-alloSCT approach in a cooperative group setting, overall response rates, rates of donor chimerism, rates of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), disease-free survival, and overall survival (OS). Sixty patients were enrolled, of whom 57 (95%) completed ASCT and 49 (82%) completed tandem ASCT-alloSCT. The TRM rate was 2% (1/49; 90% confidence interval, 0.10% to 9.3%). Moderate to severe (grades 2 to 3) acute GVHD was observed in 13 of 49 alloSCT patients (27%). One patient died due to GVHD within 9 months of alloSCT. Twenty-seven of the 49 patients (55%) who underwent alloSCT reported chronic GVHD as either limited (15/49; 31%) or extensive (12/49; 24%) in the first year post-alloSCT and prior to the start of nonprotocol therapy for progressive disease. With a median follow-up for survival of 11 years, the median OS time is 6.6 years and the median time to disease progression is 3.6 years. Similar to other studies, this study confirmed that tandem ASCT/alloSCT is associated with durable disease control in a subset of patients. This study demonstrated the feasibility of performing tandem ASCT/alloSCT in a cooperative group setting and determined that a fludarabine/cyclophosphamide RIC regimen is associated with a very low TRM rate.

Persistent heart failure following melphalan and fludarabine conditioning

Advances in chemotherapy and radiotherapy have greatly improved cancer survival, but their side effects can sometimes be more dangerous than the cancer itself. Understanding these risks is especially important when the consequences are as life-threatening as heart failure. Melphalan and fludarabine are drugs used in many chemotherapy regimens and are not usually associated with cardiotoxicity. In this report we present a patient that developed acute heart failure followed by persistent heart failure after conditioning with these drugs following a bone marrow transplant. <Learning objective: The chemotherapeutic agents melphalan and fludarabine used individually are rarely associated with cardiotoxicity. However, this case report of myocarditis and persistent heart failure, adds to the growing literature suggesting an exponential rise in cardiac complications when these agents are used in combination. Awareness of this association is important to consider when choosing and monitoring a chemotherapy regimen.>.

Proceedings From the Fourth Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation Symposium (HAPLO2016), San Diego, California, December 1, 2016

The resurgence of haploidentical stem cell transplantation (HaploSCT) over the last decade is one of the most important advances in the field of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The modified platforms of T cell depletion either ex vivo (CD34+ cell selection, "megadoses" of purified CD34+ cells, or selective depletion of T cells) or newer platforms of in vivo depletion of T cells, with either post-transplantation high-dose cyclophosphamide or intensified immune suppression, have contributed to better outcomes, with survival similar to that in HLA-matched donor transplantation. Further efforts are underway to control viral reactivation using modified T cells, improve immunologic reconstitution, and decrease the relapse rate post-transplantation using donor-derived cellular therapy products, such as genetically modified donor lymphocytes and natural killer cells. Improvements in treatment-related mortality have allowed the extension of haploidentical donor transplants to patients with hemoglobinopathies, such as thalassemia and sickle cell disease, and the possible development of platforms for immunotherapy in solid tumors. Moreover, combining HSCT from a related donor with solid organ transplantation could allow early tapering of immunosuppression in recipients of solid organ transplants and hopefully prevent organ rejection in this setting. This symposium summarizes some of the most important recent advances in HaploSCT and provides a glimpse in the future of fast growing field.

Moving Beyond Autologous Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma: Consolidation, Maintenance, Allogeneic Transplant, and Immune Therapy

For multiple myeloma, introduction of novel agents as part of the front-line treatment followed by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) induces deep responses in a majority of patients with this disease. However, disease relapse is inevitable, and, with each relapse, the remission duration becomes shorter, ultimately leading to a refractory disease. Consolidation and maintenance strategy after ASCT is one route to provide sustained disease control and prevent repeated relapses. Though the consolidation strategy remains largely confined to clinical trials, significant data support the efficacy of consolidation in improving the depth of response and outcomes. There are also increasing rates of minimal residual disease-negativity with additional consolidation therapy. On the other hand, maintenance with novel agents post-transplant is well established and has been shown to improve both progression-free and overall survival. Evolving paradigms in maintenance include the use of newer proteasome inhibitors, immunotherapy maintenance, and patient-specific maintenance-a concept that utilizes minimal residual disease as the primary driver of decisions regarding starting or continuing maintenance therapy. The other approach to overcome residual disease is immune therapeutic strategies. The demonstration of myeloma-specific alloimmunity from allogeneic transplantation is well established. More sophisticated and promising immune approaches include adoptive cellular therapies, tumor vaccines, and immune checkpoint manipulations. In the future, personalized minimal residual disease-driven treatment strategies following ASCT will help overcome the residual disease, restore multiple myeloma-specific immunity, and achieve sustained disease control while minimizing the risk of overtreatment.

Pushing the envelope-nonmyeloablative and reduced intensity preparative regimens for allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) was originally developed to allow delivery of myeloablative doses of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. With better understanding of disease pathophysiology, the graft vs malignancy (GVM) effect of allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation and toxicities associated with myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimens, the focus shifted to developing less toxic conditioning regimens to reduce treatment-related morbidity without compromising survival. Although HCT with MAC is preferred to reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) for most patients ⩽60 years with AML/myelodysplastic syndrome and ALL, RIC and nonmyeloablative (NMA) regimens allow HCT for many otherwise ineligible patients. Reduced intensity preparative regimens have produced high rates of PFS for diagnoses, which are highly sensitive to GVM. Relapse of the malignancy is the major cause of treatment failure with RIC/NMA HCT. Incorporation of novel agents like bortezomib or lenalidomide, addition of cellular immunotherapy and use of targeted radiation therapies could further improve outcome. In this review, we discuss commonly used RIC/NMA regimens and promising novel regimens.

Reducing Treatment-Related Mortality Did Not Improve Outcomes of Allogeneic Myeloablative Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for High-Risk Multiple Myeloma: A University of Michigan Prospective Series

Despite the ongoing advent of more effective immunomodulators and proteasome inhibitors, multiple myeloma (MM) remains incurable and no effective therapy is available for advanced aggressive disease. Although allogeneic (Allo) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has a curative potential, the outcomes remain poor because of high treatment-related mortality (TRM), mostly due to regimen-related toxicities and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in case of myeloablative conditionings, high relapse rate in case of reduced-intensity or nonmyeloablative regimens, and possibly other unknown MM-specific issues. In an attempt to improve TRM, without compromising conditioning intensity, we prospectively explored the feasibility and efficacy of a myeloablative but reduced-toxicity conditioning regimen, consisting of fludarabine and busulfan (FluBu4; fludarabine 40 mg/m(2)/day and busulfan 3.2 mg/kg/day i.v. × 4 days) in 22 patients with high-risk or advanced refractory MM. The majority (14 of 22, 64%) had prior autologous HCT. The median HCT-specific comorbidity index score was 3 (range, 0 to 6), with 46% having a Karnofsky performance score < 80%. Ten patients had unrelated donors, 3 of whom were 7/8 HLA-loci matched. GVHD prophylaxis was tacrolimus and methotrexate in 20 (91%). Most patients had active MM at transplantation, with a partial response in 12 of 22 (46%) and stable disease in 1 of 22 (4.5%). All 22 patients tolerated the FluBu4 conditioning well, without early toxic deaths or graft failure. Common regimen-related toxicities included mild to moderate mucositis (18 of 22, 82%) and mild transient liver function abnormality (9 of 22, 41%). There were no grade 4 toxicities but grade 3 mucositis occurred in 7 of 22 patients (32%). The cumulative incidence of severe, grades III and IV acute GVHD at day 180 was 23% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10% to 47%) and that of chronic GVHD was 68% (95% CI, 46% to 88%). The cumulative incidences of TRM at 100 days, 1 year, and 3 years were 9% (95% CI, 2% to 33%), 19% (95% CI, 7% to 44%), and 29% (95% CI, 13% to 55%), respectively. Two TRMs were due to idiopathic pneumonia syndrome and 1 was due to cirrhosis. They all had decreased pre-HCT corresponding organ function, with HCT-specific comorbidity index scores of > 3. With a median follow-up of 58.7 (range, 39 to 82) months, the cumulative incidences of relapse at 1 and 3 years were 37% (95% CI, 20% to 61%) and 50% (95% CI, 29% to 75%); those for 1-year and 3-year overall survival (OS) were 58% (95% CI, 40% to 83%) and 29% (95% CI, 15% to 57%), respectively, and those for the 1-year and 3-year progression-free survivals (PFS) were 40% (95% CI, 23% to 67%) and 15% (95% CI, 5% to 42%), respectively. In summary, the use of the myeloablative FluBu4 conditioning Allo-HCT for high-risk MM resulted in decreased TRM, compared with that of Allo-HCT using conventional myeloablative regimens; however, the relapse rate was high, including in those developing moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD. This suggested a less robust graft-versus-myeloma effect against high-risk MM, thus resulting in poor PFS and OS. Nonetheless, the FluBu4 regimen may be used as a lower-TRM platform to combine with other strategies, eg, addition of an MM-targeted agent and/or maintenance therapy with these agents, to decrease relapse or progression in patients with high-risk MM.

Multiple myeloma

Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) remains an integral part of the treatment strategy for many myeloma patients. The role of allogeneic stem cell transplant continues to be defined. There is increasing evidence that posttransplant maintenance therapy can significantly improve outcomes. It is predicted that with more routine use of cytogenetic and gene expression profiling in the future, we will be better able to identify those subgroups of patients who are expected to benefit most from early versus late versus no ASCT and those who will benefit from allogeneic stem cell transplant.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for consolidation of VGPR or CR for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a potentially curative approach in patients with multiple myeloma, but its use for consolidation of first remission has not yet been fully explored. Twenty-two myeloma patients with very good partial response (VGPR) or CR received allogeneic peripheral blood grafts as consolidation from HLA-matched donors between 2007 and 2012. Conditioning regimens were fludarabine (30 mg/m(2) i.v. if with bortezomib and 40 mg/m(2) i.v. when without bortezomib, × 4 days) plus melphalan (70 mg/m(2) intravenously × 2 days) with (n=13) or without (n=9) bortezomib (1.3 mg/m(2)). The cumulative incidence of grades II - IV acute GVHD at day 100 was 45% (95% CI: 24-65%) and moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD at 2 years was 46% (95% CI: 19-69%). With a median follow-up of 18 (range, 2-61) months, the 2-year PFS estimate is 74.8% (95% CI: 45-90%), which compares favorably with the 52% (95% CI: 35-66%) after autologous HCT for similar patients (a median follow-up of 30 (range, 9-55) months). We are conducting a phase 2 study to assess the efficacy of allogeneic HCT as post-remission therapy.

Fifty years of melphalan use in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Melphalan remains the most widely used agent in preparative regimens for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT). From its initial discovery more than 50 years ago, it has been gradually incorporated in the conditioning regimens for both autologous and allogeneic transplantations because of its myeloablative properties and broad antitumor effects as a DNA alkylating agent. Melphalan remains the mainstay conditioning for multiple myeloma and lymphomas, and it has been used successfully in preparative regimens of a variety of other hematological and nonhematological malignancies. The addition of newer agents to conditioning, such as bortezomib or lenalidomide for myeloma or clofarabine for myeloid malignancies, may improve antitumor effects for transplantation, whereas melphalan in combination with alemtuzumab may represent a backbone for future cellular therapy because of reliable engraftment and low toxicity profile. This review summarizes the development and the current use of this remarkable drug in hematopoietic SCT.

Dose escalation of total marrow irradiation with concurrent chemotherapy in patients with advanced acute leukemia undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

PURPOSE

We have demonstrated that toxicities are acceptable with total marrow irradiation (TMI) at 16 Gy without chemotherapy or TMI at 12 Gy and the reduced intensity regimen of fludarabine/melphalan in patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). This article reports results of a study of TMI combined with higher intensity chemotherapy regimens in 2 phase I trials in patients with advanced acute myelogenous leukemia or acute lymphoblastic leukemia (AML/ALL) who would do poorly on standard intent-to-cure HCT regimens.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Trial 1 consisted of TMI on Days -10 to -6, etoposide (VP16) on Day -5 (60 mg/kg), and cyclophosphamide (CY) on Day -3 (100 mg/kg). TMI dose was 12 (n=3 patients), 13.5 (n=3 patients), and 15 (n=6 patients) Gy at 1.5 Gy twice daily. Trial 2 consisted of busulfan (BU) on Days -12 to -8 (800 μM min), TMI on Days -8 to -4, and VP16 on Day -3 (30 mg/kg). TMI dose was 12 (n=18) and 13.5 (n=2) Gy at 1.5 Gy twice daily.

RESULTS

Trial 1 had 12 patients with a median age of 33 years. Six patients had induction failures (IF), and 6 had first relapses (1RL), 9 with leukemia blast involvement of bone marrow ranging from 10%-98%, 5 with circulating blasts (24%-85%), and 2 with chloromas. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Eleven patients achieved complete remission at Day 30. With a median follow-up of 14.75 months, 5 patients remained in complete remission from 13.5-37.7 months. Trial 2 had 20 patients with a median age of 41 years. Thirteen patients had IF, and 5 had 1RL, 2 in second relapse, 19 with marrow blasts (3%-100%) and 13 with peripheral blasts (6%-63%). Grade 4 dose-limiting toxicities were seen at 13.5 Gy (stomatitis and hepatotoxicity). Stomatitis was the most frequent toxicity in both trials.

CONCLUSIONS

TMI dose escalation to 15 Gy is possible when combined with CY/VP16 and is associated with acceptable toxicities and encouraging outcomes. TMI dose escalation is not possible with BU/VP16 due to dose-limiting toxicities. Future efforts will focus on whether further dose escalation with CY/VP16 is safe, with the goal of improving disease control in this high-risk population.

Predictors of prolonged survival after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma

A total of 149 patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) with myeloablative (MAC; n = 38) or reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC; n = 110) regimens at MD Anderson Cancer Center were evaluated. Of the total, 120 (81%) patients had relapsed or had refractory disease. Median age of MM patients was 50 (28-70) years with a followup time of 28.5 (3-164) months. The 100-day and 5-year treatment related mortality (TRM) rates were 17% and 47%, respectively. TRM was significantly lower with RIC regimens (13%) vs. 29% for MAC at 100 days (P = 0.012). The cumulative incidence of Grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was 35% and chronic GVHD was 46%. PFS and OS at 5 years were 15% and 21%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, allo-HCT for primary remission consolidation was associated with longer PFS (HR 0.35; 95% CI, 0.18-0.67) and OS (HR 0.29; 95% CI 0.15-0.55), while absence of high-risk cytogenetics was associated with longer PFS only (HR 0.59; 95% CI 0.37-0.95). We observe that TRM has decreased with the use of RIC regimens, and long-term disease control can be expected in a subset of MM patients undergoing allo-HCT. Further studies should be conducted in carefully designed clinical trials in this patient population.

Advances in the autologous and allogeneic transplantation strategies for multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND

Multiple myeloma is largely an incurable malignant plasma cell neoplasm; however, the landscape of its treatment is rapidly changing.

METHODS

The recent literature on both autologous and allogeneic transplant approaches for multiple myeloma was reviewed.

RESULTS

High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remains an integral component of upfront treatment strategy, and the incorporation of novel immunomodulators and proteasome inhibitor to induction regimens improves response rates and increases overall survivals. Bortezomib and lenalidomide-based combination chemotherapy regimens have become the standard induction myeloma therapy. When myeloma patients proceed to transplant after novel combination regimens, their response rates are further improved. Despite these recent major improvements, myeloma remains incurable and long-term survival appears elusive. Due in part to a potential graft-vs-myeloma effect, allogeneic HCT is a potentially curative transplant option. However, initial attempts have been hampered by the high transplant-related mortality. With a reduction of toxicity, allogeneic transplant approaches with reduced-intensity conditioning have been utilized, although they are subject to continued disease progression and relapse following transplantation. Recent research efforts have shifted to the use of a tandem autologous-allogeneic HCT approach. The long-term follow-up of this new strategy is awaited.

CONCLUSIONS

Recent advances in HCT have improved outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma. Ongoing research activity focuses on the strategies to improve outcomes of HCT by incorporation of tandem autologous-allogeneic transplantation schema, novel conditioning regimens, and the use of consolidation and maintenance therapy.

Evolving role of high dose stem cell therapy in multiple myeloma

Conventional chemotherapy has been used in the treatment of multiple myeloma. However the development of autologous stem cell transplant represented a major advance in its therapy. Complete response (CR) rates to the tune of 40-45% were seen and this translated into improvements in progression-free survival and also overall survival in some studies. As a result the autologous stem cell transplants (ASCT) is the standard of care in eligible patients and can be carried out with low treatment-related mortality. Allogenic transplant carries the potential for cure but the high mortality associated with the myeloablative transplant has made it unpopular. Reduced Intensity Stem Cell Transplants (RIST) have been tried with varying success but with a high degree of morbidity as compared to the ASCT. Introduction of newer agents like thalidomide, lenalidomide, bortezomib and liposomal doxorubicin into the induction regimens has resulted in higher CR and very good partial response rates (VGPR) as well as improvement in ease of administration. These drugs have also proved useful in patients with adverse cytogenetics. Recent trials suggest that this has translated into improvements in response rates post-ASCT. There is a suggestion that patients achieving CR/nCR or VGPR after induction therapy should be placed on maintenance and ASCT then could be used as a treatment strategy at relapse. All these trends however await confirmation from further trials. Tandem transplants have been used to augment the results obtained with ASCT and have demonstrated their utility in patients who achieved only a partial response or stable disease in response to the first transplant as well as patients with adverse cytogenetics. Incorporation of bortezomib along with melphalan into the conditioning regimen has also been tried. RIST following ASCT has been tried with varying success but does not offer any major advantage over ASCT and is associated with higher morbidity. It is hoped that recent advances in therapy will contribute greatly to improved survival.

Trends in allogeneic stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma: a CIBMTR analysis

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in multiple myeloma is limited by prior reports of high treatment-related mortality. We analyzed outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for multiple myeloma in 1207 recipients in 3 cohorts based on the year of transplantation: 1989-1994 (n = 343), 1995-2000 (n = 376), and 2001-2005 (n = 488). The most recent cohort was significantly older (53% > 50 years) and had more recipients after prior autotransplantation. Use of unrelated donors, reduced-intensity conditioning and the blood cell grafts increased over time. Rates of acute graft-versus-host (GVHD) were similar, but chronic GVHD rates were highest in the most recent cohort. Overall survival (OS) at 1-year increased over time, reflecting a decrease in treatment-related mortality, but 5-year relapse rates increased from 39% (95% confidence interval [CI], 33%-44%) in 1989-1994 to 58% (95% CI, 51%-64%; P < .001) in the 2001-2005 cohort. Projected 5-year progression-free survival and OS are 14% (95% CI, 9%-20%) and 29% (95% CI, 23%-35%), respectively, in the latest cohort. Increasing age, longer interval from diagnosis to transplantation, and unrelated donor grafts adversely affected OS in multivariate analysis. Survival at 5 years for subjects with none, 1, 2, or 3 of these risk factors were 41% (range, 36%-47%), 32% (range, 27%-37%), 25% (range, 19%-31%), and 3% (range, 0%-11%), respectively (P < .0001).

Reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma: a concise review

Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) can result in reliable donor engraftment, relatively low treatment-related mortality, and sustained remissions in the treatment of multiple myeloma. However, substantial cytoreduction pre-allografting is often necessary because of a variable graft-versus-myeloma effect. The use of RIC allogeneic HSCT immediately after autologous HSCT provides a temporal separation between tumor reduction by high-dose chemotherapy and the graft-versus-myeloma effect. There are currently a number of prospective trials attempting to address the issue of whether this strategy leads to decreases in relapse and/or improvement in overall survival as compared with double autologous transplants. Unfortunately, similar to autografting, relapse remains the major cause of treatment failure after RIC allogeneic HSCT. To improve treatment results with allografting, consideration should be given to incorporating immunomodulatory drugs and targeted treatments to enhance pretransplantation remission status, as posttransplantation maintenance therapy, or in combination with donor lymphocyte infusions for refractory or relapsed disease. Studies exploring these strategies are ongoing.

Unrelated stem cell transplantation for patients with multiple myeloma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The role of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) in treatment of myeloma patients is still controversial. Meanwhile, the numbers of unrelated SCT for hematological diseases in Europe are higher than for human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical sibling transplantations, but in multiple myeloma only 39% of the allogeneic transplantations are performed from unrelated donors and only a minority were done within prospective clinical trials.

RECENT FINDINGS

The few published data of unrelated SCT in multiple myeloma reported a higher treatment-related mortality for standard myeloablative conditioning in comparison to reduced-intensity conditioning. Despite the heterogeneous patient selection in the trial, lower nonrelapse mortality and improved survival can be achieved by careful donor selection (10/10 HLA-alleles, male donor). Natural killer-alloreactivity might play a role, but conclusive data are lacking. Transplantation in more advanced or refractory patients is associated with an inferior outcome. The results of an unrelated SCT seem to be comparable to those of HLA-identical siblings, but a direct comparison is lacking so far.

SUMMARY

Unrelated SCT in multiple myeloma is feasible, but prospective clinical trials using unrelated stem cell donors are urgently needed to define the role of an unrelated SCT in multiple myeloma in the era of novel agents.

Clinical impact of chromosomal aberrations in multiple myeloma

Chromosomal aberrations are frequently found in multiple myeloma cells and play a major role in patient outcome and management of the disease. The most important chromosomal aberrations associated with poor outcome are del(17p), t(4;14), t(14;16) and t(14;20). Others that may be associated with adverse prognosis include amp(1)(q21), del(1p32), del(13), del(8p21) and hypodiploidy. Many chromosomal aberrations have no or uncertain impact; for example, t(11;14), t(8;14) and hyperdiploidy. Attempts have been made to overcome the negative prognostic impact of chromosomal aberrations using autologous or allogeneic transplantation or new immunomodulatory drugs such as thalidomide, lenalidomide and the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib, but the results are controversial. Data suggest that allogeneic transplantation and treatment with bortezomib or lenalidomide may help to overcome the negative effect of del(13) on prognosis, whereas bortezomib may have some influence on reducing the impact of del(17p), t(4;14) and t(14;16). Chromosome analysis should always be performed at diagnosis of multiple myeloma to improve the prediction of outcome and to aid treatment decision-making.

Infusion of HLA-mismatched peripheral blood stem cells improves the outcome of chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia in elderly patients

Treatment outcome of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in elderly patients remains unsatisfactory. It has been shown that the infusion of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-mobilized donor peripheral blood stem cells (G-PBSCs) can enhance graft-versus-leukemia effects and speed hematopoietic recovery. Fifty-eight AML patients aged 60-88 years were randomly assigned to receive induction chemotherapy with cytarabine and mitoxantrone (control group; n = 28) or it plus human leukocyte antigen-mismatched G-PBSCs (G-PBSC group; n = 30). Patients who achieved complete remission received another 2 cycles of postremission therapy with intermediate-dose cytarabine or it plus G-PBSCs. The complete remission rate was significantly higher in the G-PBSC group than in the control group (80.0% vs 42.8%; P = .006). The median recovery times of neutrophils and platelets were 11 days and 14.5 days, respectively, in the G-PBSC group and 16 days and 20 days, respectively, in the control group after chemotherapy. The 2-year probability of disease-free survival was significantly higher in the G-PBSC group than in the control group (38.9% vs 10.0%; P = .01). No graft-versus-host disease was observed in any patient. Persistent donor microchimerism was successfully detected in all of the 4 female patients. These results indicate that G-PBSCs in combination with conventional chemotherapy may provide a promising treatment method for AML in elderly patients.

Phase 1/2 trial of total marrow and lymph node irradiation to augment reduced-intensity transplantation for advanced hematologic malignancies

This phase 1/2 study assessed the augmentation of reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) with total marrow and lymph node irradiation (TMLI), for peripheral blood stem cell transplantation, in patients with advanced hematologic disease. The regimen consisted of fludarabine 25 mg/m(2) per day for 5 days, melphalan 140 mg/m(2) for one day, and TMLI radiation at 150 cGy/fraction in 8 fractions over 4 days. Eligible patients were over 50 years old and/or had compromised organ function. Median age of the 33 evaluable patients was 55.2 years. Eighteen events of nonhematologic grade III or higher toxicities occurred in 9 patients. Day 30 and day 100 mortalities were 3% and 15%, respectively. Patients achieved myeloid and platelet engraftment at a median of 14 days after transplantation. Long-term toxicities occurred in 2 patients: hypokalemia and tremor, both grade III, on days 370 and 361 after transplantation. Fourteen patients died, 7 of relapse-related causes and 7 of non-relapse-related causes. With a median follow-up for living patients of 14.7 months, 1-year overall survival, event-free survival, and non-relapse-related mortality were 75%, 65%, and 19%, respectively. Addition of TMLI to RIC is feasible and safe and could be offered to patients with advanced hematologic malignancies who might not otherwise be candidates for RIC.

Treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma in the era of novel agents

The introduction of the Immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) and proteasome inhibitors, used either as a single-agent or combined with classic anti-myeloma therapies, has improved the outcome for patients with relapsed myeloma. However, there is currently no generally accepted standard treatment for relapsed/refractory myeloma patients, partly because of the absence of trials comparing the efficacy of the novel agents in relapsed/refractory myeloma. Choice of a new treatment regimen depends on both patient and disease-specific characteristics. A lenalidomide-based regimen is the first choice in patients with neuropathy, while bortezomib has the highest efficacy in patients with renal insufficiency and is not associated with increased risk of thromboembolism. A second autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) can be applied in patients with a progression-free period of ≥ 18-24 months after the first auto-SCT. In high-risk relapse such as occurring early after auto-SCT consolidation with allogeneic SCT can be considered. In this review we provide an overview of the various salvage regimens and give recommendations for treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma in different clinical settings.

EPOCH-F: a novel salvage regimen for multiple myeloma before reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic SCT

There exists a need for effective salvage regimens for multiple myeloma patients being considered for reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (RI-alloHSCT). We developed EPOCH-F, a regimen consisting of infusional etoposide, VCR and adriamycin with prednisone, CY and fludarabine to achieve both tumor control and host lymphocyte depletion to facilitate engraftment before RI-alloHSCT. In all, 22 multiple myeloma patients were treated with EPOCH-F before RI-alloHSCT. The median age was 53 years (range 36-65), and the median number of previous therapies was 2 (range 1-8). Patients received a median of three cycles (range 1-5) of EPOCH-F. Toxicities were primarily hematologic and manageable. Median lymphocyte counts decreased from 1423/μL (range 335-2788) to 519/μL (range 102-1420; P=0.0002). The overall response (≥PR) to EPOCH-F was 22 with 13% achieving a CR/near-complete response (nCR); only 1 patient progressed while on therapy. A total of 20 patients underwent RI-alloHSCT. Median day +100 donor chimerism was 100% (range 60-100). In all, 70% of patients achieved very good partial response or better response after transplant; 40% of patients achieved CR/nCR. TRM at 100 days and 5 years was 5 and 30%, respectively. Median OS after RI-alloHSCT was 46.1 months. EPOCH-F provides disease control and host lymphocyte depletion with consistent full donor engraftment in multiple myeloma patients undergoing RI-alloHSCT.

The Belgian 2010 consensus recommendations for the treatment of multiple myeloma

Since the introduction of novel therapeutic agents including thalidomide, lenalidomide and bortezomib, the prognosis of multiple myeloma (MM) has significantly improved. These agents have been incorporated into numerous treatment schedules for newly diagnosed as well as more advanced MM patients. Hence, the therapeutic options for MM have become more complex and subject to rapid changes. The multiple myeloma study group (MMSG) of the Belgian Hematological Society has established recommendations for the treatment of MM as based on an extensive review of the literature which is also summarized in this paper. The recommendations are the result of a consensus opinion between haematologists with experience in the field and representing most haematology centres in Belgium. Where applicable, reimbursement criteria are also taken into account. The consensus recommendations should be a reference for use by clinical haematologists in daily practice.

Role of allogeneic transplantation in multiple myeloma in the era of new drugs

High-dose melphalan with autologous stem cell rescue has been regarded as the standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed myeloma up to the age of 65–70 years. The recent development of agents with potent anti-tumor activity such as thalidomide, lenalidomide and bortezomib has further improved overall survival and response rates. However, relapse is a continuous risk.

Allografting is a potentially curative treatment for a subset of multiple myeloma patients for its well documented graft-vs-myeloma effects. However, its role has been hotly debated. Even though molecular remissions have been reported up to 50% after high-dose myeloablative conditionings, their applications, given the high toxicity, have been for long limited to younger relapsed/refractory patients. These limitations have greatly been reduced through the introduction of non-myeloablative/reduced-intensity conditionings.

The introduction of new drugs, characterised by low risks of early mortality, indeed requires to define role and timing of an allograft to capture the subset of patients who may most benefit from graft-vs-myeloma effects.

Ultimately, new drugs should not be viewed as mutually exclusive with an allograft. They may be employed to achieve profound cytoreduction before and enhance graft-versus-myeloma effects as consolidation/maintenance therapy after an allograft. However, this combination should be explored only in well-designed clinical trials.

CD34+ cell dose and establishment of full donor chimerism at day +100 are important factors for survival with reduced-intensity conditioning with fludarabine and melphalan before allogeneic hematopoietic SCT for hematologic malignancies

The combination of fludarabine and melphalan as a reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen extends allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) as a therapeutic option for elderly or frail patients with relapsed, refractory or other high-risk hematologic malignancies. Whether any modifiable factors exist that could improve survival before or immediately after HSCT is unknown. We reviewed the medical records of the first 50 patients at our institution to undergo fludarabine/melphalan RIC from September 2000 to September 2007 to determine factors associated with survival. A total of 25 (50%) patients had undergone prior HSCT and as such was a high-risk group of patients. On multivariate analysis, CD34(+) cell dose greater than 5.5 × 10(6) per kg (risk ratio (RR) 0.44, 95% CI 0.19-0.98, P=0.02) and full donor chimerism at day +100 (RR 0.17, 95% CI 0.06-0.64, P=0.002) remained independent prognostic factors. In our series, achievement of full donor chimerism at day +100 was associated with an approximately 70% 2-year survival, a favorable outcome in this high-risk group of patients. Although the infused CD34(+) cell dose is a modifiable variable, whether donor lymphocyte infusions or other immunologic interventions should be performed to promote the establishment of full chimerism early post transplant remains unknown.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma beyond 2010

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is considered the gold standard in the frontline therapy of younger patients with multiple myeloma because it results in higher complete remission (CR) rates and longer event-free survival than conventional chemotherapy. The greatest benefit from ASCT is obtained in patients achieving CR after transplantation, the likelihood of CR being associated with the M-protein size at the time of transplantation. The incorporation of novel agents results in higher pre- and posttransplantation CR rates. Induction with bortezomib-containing regimens is encouraging in patients with poor-risk cytogenetics. However, longer follow-up is required to assess the impact of this increased CR on long-term survival. The results of posttransplantation consolidation/maintenance with new drugs are encouraging. All this indicates that, in the era of novel agents, high-dose therapy should be optimized rather than replaced. Because of its high transplantation-related mortality, myeloablative allografting has been generally replaced by reduced-intensity conditioning (reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic transplantation). The best results are achieved after a debulky ASCT, with a progression-free survival plateau of 25% to 30% beyond 6 years from reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic transplantation. The development of novel reduced-intensity preparative regimens and peri- and posttransplantation strategies aimed at minimizing graft-versus-host disease, and enhancing the graft-versus-myeloma effect are key issues.

Graft vs. Host Disease and Graft vs. Myeloma Effect after Non-myeloablative Allogeneic Transplantation

For many years progress in event free and overall survival in patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma have been modest, however recently newer therapeutic options have become available and, for a small but increasing subset of patients, an "operational cure" can be offered. Although autologous transplantation is associated with a prolongation in event free and overall survival as compared to conventional chemotherapy, there is no plateau in the survival curves. By contrast, the use of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells provides a tumor-free stem cell source and graft-vs.-myeloma activity leading to a higher frequency of long term survivors in molecular remission. Unfortunately, allogeneic transplantation has been associated with high transplant-related mortality (TRM). Non-myeloablative or reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens, designed to be immunosuppressive rather than myeloablative, in an effort to reduce the toxicity and TRM associated with high dose chemotherapy, but maintaining the GVM effect, have been developed showing up to 90% overall response rate and low TRM. Interestingly, in a significant proportion of patients disease response is preceded by GVHD, suggesting a clear relationship between GVHD and graft vs. myeloma effect. Nevertheless these patients are at risk of developing life threatening complications and, on the contrary, some patients who reach disease control after GVHD and respond to GVHD therapy may finally relapse. Thus, efforts to separate GVM and GVHD are still required in order to improve the outcome of myeloma patients receiving allogeneic transplantation.

Autologous-allogeneic tandem stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma

The decrease in treatment-related mortality by using reduced intensity conditioning and the well-proven immunological effect of the graft to multiple myeloma cells has increased the interest in using allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma. The concept of a cytoreductive autograft followed by a dose-reduced allogeneic stem cell transplantation appears to be the most promising approach. Preliminary reports of several groups observed a treatment-related mortality at 1 year ranged from 0-17%. The rate of acute graft-vs.-host disease (GvHD) grade II-IV ranged from 32-44% and of chronic GvHD from 28-64%. The overall response rates for all studies ranged from 68-83%, including a high rate of complete remissions of 52-83%. The overall survival at 2 or 3 years was between 62% and 78%, and the progression-free survival between 54% and 56%. Despite the high rate of complete remissions after autologous-allogeneic tandem transplantation observed in nearly all trials, the relapse rate is quite considerable and exceeded nearly 40% at 2 years. Therefore, the reduced allogeneic treatment approach in patients with multiple myeloma has still to be improved and further preclinical and clinical research is focused on two major issues: (i) to further reduce treatment-related mortality and (ii) to enhance the remission status after transplantation, via adoptive immunotherapy inducing molecular remission and enhancing the cure rate of this approach.

Role of allogeneic stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma

High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue has been regarded as the standard of care for young newly diagnosed myeloma patients. Moreover, the development of new agents with potent anti-tumor activity has further improved survival. However, relapse is a continuous risk primarily due to the inability of current therapies to eradicate all myeloma cells. Allografting is the only potentially curative treatment at least for a subset of multiple myeloma patients due to its well documented graft-versus-myeloma effects. Given the high transplant mortality of the high-dose myeloablative conditionings used until recently, allografting has for a long time been limited to younger relapsed/refractory patients. These limitations have been reduced significantly by the use of reduced-intensity conditionings. Although results of recent trials are encouraging, the subset of patients who may benefit most from an allograft remains to be determined. An overview of the clinical outcomes obtained with allografting and possible future developments are reported.

Treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

The introduction of several novel and active treatments and improvements in supportive care of myeloma patients has resulted in a prolongation of the survival of these patients. However, myeloma remains an incurable disease and almost all patients will relapse. Effective management of the relapsing/refractory disease incorporates several different strategies, depending on prior treatments, responses, and duration of responses, as well as residual toxicity, age, and physical condition. High-dose dexamethasone still has a role in the management of disease complications such as cytopenias, renal impairment, or spinal cord compression until another agent is added. High-dose therapy may be considered for selected patients who have a long-term treatment-free interval after their first transplantation. Allogeneic transplantation is limited to selected young patients, preferably with an HLA-matched donor. However, the backbone of current strategies for the management of relapsed/refractory myeloma includes the novel agents thalidomide, bortezomib, and lenalidomide. These agents, either with dexamethasone or in combination with chemotherapy, have shown significant activity both in relapsed and in refractory patients. Based on the results of phase III trials, lenalidomide and bortezomib have increased the post-relapse survival and are active in patients who have received prior novel agents; lenalidomide is active in thalidomide-pretreated or bortezomib-pretreated patients and bortezomib alone or in combination with chemotherapy is active in thalidomide/lenalidomide-pretreated patients. Combinations of novel agents show synergistic activity and may overcome drug resistance. Finally, special consideration is needed for the management of patients with renal impairment or other poor prognostic features.

A Phase II trial of autologous stem cell transplantation followed by mini-allogeneic stem cell transplantation for the treatment of multiple myeloma: an analysis of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ECOG E4A98 and E1A97

Conventional allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for multiple myeloma is associated with high transplantation-related mortality (TRM). Nonmyeloablative allogeneic transplantation (NST) uses the well-known graft-versus-myeloma (GVM) effect to eradicate minimal residual disease. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group conducted a Phase II trial of autologous HSCT followed by NST to provide maximal tumor cytoreduction to allow for a subsequent GVM effect. Patients received melphalan 200 mg/m(2) with autologous HSCT, followed by fludarabine 30 mg/m(2) in 5 daily doses and cyclophosphamide 1 g/m(2) in 2 daily doses with matched sibling donor NST. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis included cyclosporine and corticosteroids. The primary endpoints were TRM, graft failure, acute GVHD, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Thirty-two patients were enrolled into the study; 23 patients completed both transplantations (72%). Best responses post-NST were 7 (30%) complete remission (CR), 11 (48%) partial remission (PR), 2 (9%) no response, and 3 (13%) not evaluable. Acute grade III-IV GVHD was observed in 4 patients (17%), and chronic GVHD was seen in 13 patients (57%; 7 limited, 6 extensive). Chronic GVHD resulted in the following responses: 3 (23%) CR, 1 continuing CR, and 6 (46%) PR. Two patients (8.7%) had early TRM. With a median follow up of 4.6 years, the median PFS was 3.6 years, and the 2-year OS was 78%. Our findings indicate that autologous HSCT followed by NST is feasible, with a low early TRM in a cooperative group setting. The overall response rate was 78%, including 30% CR, similar to other reports for autologous HSCT-NST. Because a plateau in PFS or OS was not observed with this treatment approach even in patients achieving CR, we suggest that future studies use posttransplantation maintenance therapy.

Fludarabine in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a review

Fludarabine (FAMP) is the most effective and most extensively studied purine analog in indolent B-cell malignancies. Its use is indicated for first-and second-line treatment of B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL). FAMP as a single agent has produced superior response rates and progression-free survival than standard therapy with chlorambucil and alkylator-based regimen. Efficacy of FAMP may be increased by combining this purine analog with other chemotherapeutic and non-chemotherapeutic agents. FAMP and cyclophosphamide combination (FC) has shown promising results with higher overall response and complete response rates than FAMP in monotherapy, although no difference has been detected in survival. Quality of response and eradication of minimal residual disease (MRD) have been reported to be associated with prolonged survival. Eradication of MRD has been achieved by combining FC with mitoxantrone or monoclonal antibody including alemtuzumab or rituximab or both. FAMP has been widely used in non-myeloablative conditioning regimens, often combined with a variety of other cytotoxic agents, with the aim of inducing enough immunosuppression to allow successful engraftment and to exert some pretransplant anti-tumor activity. The current paper provides an overview of use of FAMP as a single agent or as a cornerstone of different therapeutic strategies for treatment of B-CLL patients.

Role of autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation in myeloma

The treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), a largely incurable B-cell hematologic malignancy, is changing dramatically. Autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) and the approval of two new classes of drugs, immunomodulators and proteosome inhibitors, have resulted in improved response rates and increased overall survivals. Thalidomide, bortezomib and lenalidomide have been combined with corticosteroids, alkylators and anthracyclines in front-line MM treatment. Phase 2 and preliminary phase 3 studies have reported very high response rates and complete response rates formerly seen only with SCT. When patients with MM who have received these new drugs then proceed to transplant, major response rates are further increased. Owing to limited follow-up, it is unclear whether these higher response rates translate into increased survival. Despite these improvements, the disease remains incurable for all but a small fraction of patients. Allogeneic SCT is potentially curative, due in part to a graft-versus-myeloma effect but is limited by mortality. Mortality can be reduced through the use of lower intensity conditioning regimens but this comes at a cost of higher rates of disease progression and relapse. Strategies to improve outcomes of allogeneic transplants include more intensive, yet non-myeloablative conditioning regimens, tandem transplants, peripheral blood cells, graft engineering, post-transplant maintenance and targeted conditioning therapies.

The role of high-dose chemotherapy followed by peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for the treatment of multiple myeloma

The management of multiple myeloma has changed significantly over the past 10 years. The results obtained with conventional chemotherapy were disappointing; however the use of high dose therapy (HDT) and stem cell transplantation has significantly improved survival. Autologous, allogeneic and tandem transplantation, along with different conditioning regimens, have been studied in an attempt to optimise and further improve outcomes. This review summarises the role of stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma. The advent of novel therapies such as thalidomide, lenalidomide and bortezomib have started to redefine the role of peripheral stem cell transplantation, however, further study is needed to better understand how to most effectively use these agents in multiple myeloma in conjunction with HDT.

Modern treatment options for elderly patients with multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma, an incurable malignancy of plasma cells, is a disease of the elderly. In younger patients, significant therapeutic progress has been achieved, but survival outcomes remain unacceptably low in older adults with multiple myeloma. Diverse factors, including comorbidity, performance status, decreased physiologic reserve, and potential undertreatment, contribute to these poor outcomes. Unfortunately, many clinical trials are designed to exclude elderly patients with coexisting diseases, so only limited data are available and no guidelines exist on how to treat this challenging and growing myeloma population. A broader range of therapeutic options has become available within the last few years, including chemotherapy with either established or newly available drugs, immunomodulators, and high-dose treatment with stem cell support (autologous as well as allogeneic). In this review, we discuss the data available from clinical trials investigating antineoplastic treatment of elderly multiple myeloma patients.