Prevalence of inherited prothrombotic abnormalities and central venous catheter-related thrombosis in haematopoietic stem cell transplants recipients

Venous thromboembolism in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A narrative review

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and its treatment has significant effects on morbidity and non-relapse mortality. There is a complex interplay on balancing the risk for thrombosis and bleeding in these patients, making treatment decisions particularly challenging. Despite this, there are currently no validated risk assessment models or guidelines to aid clinical decision making on thromboprophylaxis and VTE treatment in this population of patients. Herein, we review the many risk factors for VTE in HSCT patients, categorized into patient, disease, catheter, treatment, laboratory, and transplant-related variables. This review also discusses current thromboprophylaxis and VTE management strategies in HSCT patients, with scope into the development of risk assessment models that allow for identification of high-risk subgroups who may benefit from targeted intervention.

Outcomes of symptomatic venous thromboembolism after haploidentical donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and comparison with human leukocyte antigen-identical sibling transplantation

BACKGROUND

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is regarded as a curative therapy for majority of hematologic malignancies and some non-malignant hematologic diseases. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) has become increasingly recognized as a severe complication following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT).

OBJECTIVES

To show the characteristics of VTE after haploidentical donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HID-HSCT) and make comparisons with matched related donor HSCT (MRD-HSCT).

PATIENTS/METHODS

A retrospective nested case-control study design was used, cases with VTE and matched controls were selected, with 3534 patients underwent HID-HSCT and 1289 underwent MRD-HSCT.

RESULTS

During follow-up, 114 patients with VTE were identified. The incidence of VTE in HID-HSCT group was similar to that of MRD-HSCT group (2.4% versus 2.3%, P = 0.92). In HID-HSCT group, VTE occurred at a median time of 92.5 days, which was earlier than MRD-HSCT group (243.5 days). For HID-HSCT, advanced disease status, cardiovascular risk factors, acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD), and relapse were the independent risk factors for VTE. For MRD-HSCT, cardiovascular risk factors, aGVHD, and relapse were associated with VTE. Overall survival (OS) of patients following HID-HSCT and MRD-HSCT were similar, but the OS in patients with VTE was significantly lower than patients without VTE.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no statistical difference in the incidence of VTE after HID-HSCT compared with MRD-HSCT. The development of VTE adversely impacted the OS after allo-HSCT.

Acute phase after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

The transplantation of allogeneic or autologous haematopoietic stem cells is an established treatment for many malignant and non-malignant diseases of the bone marrow. Intensive cytoreductive regimens administered before transplantation induce prolonged and severe cytopenia of all haematopoietic lineages. Thrombocytopenia leads to an increased risk of bleeding, which may be further aggravated by consumption of plasmatic factors as a result of tumour lysis or after antibody administration. At the same time, patients after transplantation are also at increased risk of thrombotic complications. Endothelial damage induced by radio-and chemotherapy, indwelling catheters, prolonged immobilization and a high incidence of systemic infection all contribute to the frequent occurrence of thromboembolic events in this population.

This review discusses the incidence and risk factors for haemorrhagic and thrombotic complications after stem cell transplantation. Special emphasis is given to complications occurring specifically in the context of transplantation such as diffuse alveolar haemorrhage, haemorrhagic cystitis, veno-occlusive disease, and transplant associated microangiopathy.

Venous Thromboembolism after Allogeneic Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Single-Center Study

Objective:

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in children who undergo hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has high morbidity. The aim of this study is to assess the incidence of VTE in allogeneic pediatric HSCT recipients and the contribution of pretransplant prothrombotic risk factors to thrombosis.

Materials and Methods:

We retrospectively evaluated 92 patients between April 2010 and November 2012 undergoing allogeneic HSCT who had completed 100 days post-HSCT. Before HSCT, coagulation profiles; acquired and inherited prothrombotic risk factors including FV G1691A (factor V Leiden), prothrombin G20210A, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T, and MTHFR A1298C mutations; and serum homocysteine and lipoprotein (a), plasma antithrombin III, protein C, and protein S levels were obtained from all patients.

Results:

In the screening of thrombophilia, 8 patients (9%) were heterozygous for factor V Leiden, 5 (6%) were homozygous for MTHFR 677TT, 12 (14%) were homozygous for MTHFR 1298CC, and 2 (2%) were heterozygous for prothrombin G20210A mutation. We observed VTE in 5 patients (5.4%); a prothrombotic risk factor was found in 3 out of these 5 patients, while 4 out of 5 patients had central venous catheters. It was determined there was no significant relationship between VTE and inherited prothrombotic risk factors.

Conclusion:

VTE after HSCT seems to be a low-frequency event that may be due to low-dose, low-molecular-weight heparin prophylaxis, and the role of inherited prothrombotic risk factors cannot be entirely excluded without a prospective study.

Systemic Anticoagulant Prophylaxis for Central Catheter–Associated Venous Thrombosis in Cancer Patients

Objective:

To review the literature regarding the incidence of thrombosis in cancer patients with central venous catheters (CVCs) and weigh the evidence supporting thromboprophylaxis in this patient population.

Data Sources:

Clinical literature was identified by searching MEDLINE (1966–February 2007) using the key search terms malignancy, cancer, catheters, prophylaxis, thrombosis, and central venous catheters.

Study Selection and Data Extraction:

An evaluation of retrospective and prospective clinical trials that studied the use of systemic anticoagulants (eg, warfarin, heparin, and low-molecular-weight heparin [LMWH]) to prevent thrombosis with CVCs was performed. Different patient populations, including those manifesting with solid tumor or hematologic malignancy and those undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant, were evaluated for this review.

Data Synthesis:

Thrombosis associated with CVCs is a common complication in cancer patients. Most CVC thrombosis will occur within 30 days after placement, with a majority within 8 days. The incidence may depend on the type of CVC and location of the catheter tip. Despite recommendations against the use of systemic anticoagulation for prophylaxis against CVC thrombosis, a potential role continues to be explored in selected settings. Several variables are noted between published clinical trials, making any comparisons difficult to determine whether any benefit exists. Generally, the use of mini-dose warfarin, LMWH, or low-dose unfractionated heparin did not consistently reach significance in reporting a reduction in CVC thrombosis.

Conclusions:

Available data do not support the routine use of anticoagulants for thromboprophylaxis to prevent CVC-related thrombosis. However, several inconsistencies can be found in the studies done to date. More studies are needed to identify subsets of cancer patients who are at higher risk of developing CVC thrombosis and may benefit from prophylactic systemic anticoagulation.

Association of thrombophilia and catheter-associated thrombosis in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Essentials It is unclear if thrombophilia increases the risk of catheter-associated thrombosis in children. We conducted a meta-analysis on thrombophilia and pediatric catheter-associated thrombosis. Presence of ≥1 trait confers additional risk of venous thrombosis in children with catheters. Limitations of included studies preclude us from recommending routine thrombophilia testing.

SUMMARY

Background The association between thrombophilia and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) associated with central venous catheter (CVC) use, the most important pediatric risk factor for thrombosis, is unclear in children. Pediatric studies with small sample sizes have reported conflicting results. We sought to evaluate whether, among children with CVCs, thrombophilia increases the risk of CVC-associated DVT (CADVT). Materials and methods We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Web of Science, the Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials, PubMed and reference lists for controlled studies published from the inception of the database until September 2015. Included were studies of children aged <21 years with CVCs who were systematically tested for thrombophilic traits that are commonly screened for in clinical practice. Pooled prevalence rates and pooled odds ratios (pORs) of CADVT with thrombophilia were estimated by use of a random effects model. Results We analyzed 16 cohort studies with 1279 children, 277 of whom had CADVT, and with 12 traits tested. There was significant heterogeneity in the included studies. The presence of one or more traits was associated with CADVT (pOR 3.20; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.56-6.54). Although the prevalence of most traits was < 0.10, children with protein C deficiency, elevated factor VIII levels and the FV Leiden mutation had an increased prevalence of CADVT. The association with thrombophilia seemed to be stronger for symptomatic CADVT (pOR 6.71; 95% CI 1.93-23.37) than for asymptomatic CADVT (pOR 2.14; 95% CI 1.10-4.18). Conclusions On the basis of the low prevalence of specific traits, the relatively weak association with CADVT, and the limitations of the included studies, we cannot recommend routine testing of thrombophilias in children with CADVT.

High-dose corticosteroid associated with catheter-related thrombosis after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) recipients are at an increased risk of thrombotic complications, most of which are catheter-related and present a substantial challenge. The incidence of CRT varies considerably depending on clinical factors. However, the underlying pathogenesis and risk factors remain unclear.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective nested case-control study in patients following allo-HSCT. Thrombotic episodes were diagnosed based on the clinical suspicion of the physician (pain, swelling, etc.) with subsequent CVC or PICC thrombosis confirmed via duplex ultrasound. Cases with CRT and controls were matched for time of HSCT, age at HSCT, donor source and type of insertion (CVCs or PICC).

RESULTS

During the 8-year period, catheters were placed in 2896 patients, with a total of 40 patients (1.38%) developed CRT, among which 11 were associated with CVCs and 29 were associated with PICCs. The median duration from catheter insertion to thrombosis was 97days. Despite reports of an association between thrombosis and infection, central line-associated bloodstream infection was comparable between groups. No significant differences were noted in terms of primary disease, donor type, conditioning regimen or catheter type between the cases and controls. A multivariate regression analysis identified high-dose corticosteroids as independent risk factors for the development of CRT. CRT seems to negatively affect prognosis in allo-HSCT patients.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, we demonstrate that the use of high-dose corticosteroids is correlated with the onset of CRT. However, the efficacy and safety of thromboprophylaxis in this population require further investigation.

No impact of endogenous prothrombotic conditions on the risk of central venous line-related thrombotic events in children: results of the KIDCAT study (KIDs with Catheter Associated Thrombosis)

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Central venous lines (CVLs) are the major exogenous risk factor for deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in children. The study objective was to assess whether endogenous prothrombotic conditions contribute to the risk of CVL-related DVT in children.

METHODS

This was a cohort study of consecutive children with heart disease requiring CVLs for perioperative care. CVLs were inserted percutaneously in the upper venous system and patients received prophylaxis with continuous unfractionated heparin (50 u kg(-1)  d(-1) ). Blood samples to test for prothrombotic conditions were collected prospectively and assayed in a blinded fashion. Outcome assessment was by screening for DVT by venography, venous ultrasound and echocardiography.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 90 children, median age 2.7 years (0 months-18 years). Prevalence rates of antithrombin deficiency, protein C deficiency, protein S deficiency, heterozygous factor V Leiden, prothrombin G20210A mutation, methylentetrahydrofolate C677TT genotype, hyperhomocysteinemia, lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies and increased levels of lipoprotein (a) were within the range reported for the general population. At least one prothrombotic condition was present in 38% of children and combined abnormalities in 8%. The incidence of DVT was 28% (25/90), and most DVTs were asymptomatic. None of the prothrombotic conditions showed a significant association with DVT. The population attributable risk (i.e. the risk of DVT in the overall population attributable to a specific condition) did not exceed 2.2%.

CONCLUSION

Prothrombotic conditions did not have an important impact on the risk of DVT in children with short-term CVLs. The results of the study suggest that screening for prothrombotic conditions is not justified in this setting.

Incidence of catheter-related complications in patients with central venous or hemodialysis catheters: a health care claims database analysis

Background

Central venous catheter (CVC) and hemodialysis (HD) catheter usage are associated with complications that occur during catheter insertion, dwell period, and removal. This study aims to identify and describe the incidence rates of catheter-related complications in a large patient population in a United States-based health care claims database after CVC or HD catheter placement.

Methods

Patients in the i3 InVision DataMart^® health care claims database with at least 1 CVC or HD catheter insertion claim were categorized into CVC or HD cohorts using diagnostic and procedural codes from the US Renal Data System, American College of Surgeons, and American Medical Association’s Physician Performance Measures. Catheter-related complications were identified using published diagnostic and procedural codes. Incidence rates (IRs)/1000 catheter-days were calculated for complications including catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs), thrombosis, embolism, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), major bleeding (MB), and mechanical catheter–related complications (MCRCs).

Results

Thirty percent of the CVC cohort and 54% of the HD cohort had catheter placements lasting <90 days. Catheter-related complications occurred most often during the first 90 days of catheter placement. IRs were highest for CRBSIs in both cohorts (4.0 [95% CI, 3.7-4.3] and 5.1 [95% CI, 4.7-5.6], respectively). Other IRs in CVC and HD cohorts, respectively, were thrombosis, 1.3 and 0.8; MCRCs, 0.6 and 0.7; embolism, 0.4 and 0.5; MB, 0.1 and 0.3; and ICH, 0.1 in both cohorts. Patients with cancer at baseline had significantly higher IRs for CRBSIs and thrombosis than non-cancer patients. CVC or HD catheter–related complications were most frequently seen in patients 16 years or younger.

Conclusions

The risk of catheter-related complications is highest during the first 90 days of catheter placement in patients with CVCs and HD catheters and in younger patients (≤16 years of age) with HD catheters. Data provided in this study can be applied toward improving patient care.

Catheter-related infections in pediatric patients with cancer

Central venous catheters (CVCs) are essential in the management of pediatric patients receiving antineoplastic therapy or bone marrow transplants, and have significantly improved their quality of life, but CVC-related infectious complications are a major source of morbidity. It has been estimated that 14-51 % of the CVCs implanted in children with malignancies may be complicated by bacteremia, and that the incidence of infections is 1.4-1.9 episodes per 1,000 CVC days. However, there are few recent data concerning the epidemiology of CVC-related infections, the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in their etiology, or the main factors associated with an increased risk of infection by type of catheter, patient age, the type of cancer, or the presence of neutropenia. Moreover, although various new strategies have been proposed in an attempt to reduce the risk of CVC-related infections, such as catheters impregnated with antiseptics/antibiotics, lock antibiotic prophylaxis, the use of ointments at the exit site, and antithrombotic prophylaxis, their real efficacy in children has not yet been demonstrated. The management of CVC-related infections remains difficult, mainly because of the number of still open questions (including the choice of optimal antimicrobial therapy because of the increasing isolation of multiresistant bacterial strains, treatment duration, whether catheters should be removed or not, the feasibility of guidewire exchange, and the usefulness of antibiotic lock therapy) and the lack of studies of children with cancer. Only well-designed, prospective clinical trials involving pediatric cancer patients can clarify optimal prevention and treatment strategies for CVC-related infections in this population.

Predictors of the development of surgical complications among hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to determine possible risk factors for the development of surgical complications after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). HSCT carries the possibility for the development of surgical morbidities and mortalities; certain populations of patients are at higher risk for developing complications. Defining those risk factors will help surgeons to anticipate and manage these complications.

METHODS

The records of 165 patients at King Hussein Cancer Center (KHCC) were reviewed from January 2007 to December 2008. Patients' characteristics, including age, source and type of transplant, behavior of disease, total body irradiation (TBI), immunity status, and intensity of conditioning were studied.

RESULTS

According to our data, abdominal complications were more common among patients who received TBI versus patients who did not, and in patients who received peripheral blood versus bone marrow and cord blood as the source of stem cells. Ear, nose, and throat (ENT) complications were found more in patients who underwent nonmyeloablation conditioning. Catheter-related complications were found more significantly in immune-compromised patients during the post-engraftment period. We also found that ENT complications were more frequent in patients with cord blood as the source of stem cells, although the results are inconclusive due to the small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

Pretransplantation factors can be used as predictors for the development of surgical complications in HSCT recipients. Abdominal complications were significantly more common in patients who received total body irradiation as part of their conditioning regimen and when the peripheral blood was a source for stem cell transplantation.

Risk factors for catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) in cancer patients: a patient-level data (IPD) meta-analysis of clinical trials and prospective studies

BACKGROUND

Knowledge of independent, baseline risk factors for catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) may help select adult cancer patients who are at high risk to receive thromboprophylaxis.

OBJECTIVES

We conducted a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data to identify these baseline risk factors.

PATIENTS/METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, DARE and the Grey literature databases were searched in all languages from 1995 to 2008. Prospective studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were eligible. Studies were included if original patient-level data were provided by the investigators and if CRT was objectively confirmed with valid imaging. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of 17 prespecified baseline characteristics was conducted. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated.

RESULTS

A total sample of 5636 subjects from five RCTs and seven prospective studies was included in the analysis. Among these subjects, 425 CRT events were observed. In multivariate logistic regression, the use of implanted ports as compared with peripherally implanted central venous catheters (PICCs), decreased CRT risk (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.23-0.80), whereas past history of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (OR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.05-3.92), subclavian venipuncture insertion technique (OR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.07-4.34) and improper catheter tip location (OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.22-3.02), increased CRT risk.

CONCLUSIONS

CRT risk is increased with use of PICCs, previous history of DVT, subclavian venipuncture insertion technique and improper positioning of the catheter tip. These factors may be useful for risk stratifying patients to select those for thromboprophylaxis. Prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

Congenital thrombophilia and central venous catheter-related thrombosis in patients with cancer

Central venous catheter (CVC)-related thrombosis is a frequently occurring complication and may cause significant morbidity in patients with cancer. The aim of this review is to discuss the main studies that examined whether a state of thrombophilia increases the risk of CVC-related thrombosis in patients with cancer. The studies were retrieved by an extensive Medline search. Patients with cancer with a CVC and a factor V Leiden mutation have a higher risk of developing CVC-related thrombosis than patients with cancer having a CVC without the mutation. The scarce information available suggests hyperhomocysteinemia to be a risk factor for CVC-related thrombosis. For other congenital thrombophilia factors, the available data are too limited to allow for any definitive conclusions to be made. Because the clinical implications of all these findings remain to be clarified, routine screening of patients with cancer having a CVC for thrombophilia cannot yet be recommended on the basis of the studies discussed.

Risk of thrombosis and infections of central venous catheters and totally implanted access ports in patients treated for cancer

INTRODUCTION

Thrombosis and infections are well known complications of central venous catheters and totally implanted access ports. These complications lead to increased costs due to prolonged hospitalisation, increased antibiotics use and need for replacement. The objectives of the study were to document the occurrence of catheter related thrombosis and infections in patients with central venous catheters and totally implanted chest ports in cancer patients and to investigate whether factor V Leiden is a risk factor for catheter related thrombosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between February 2002 and November 2004, 43 patients with central venous catheter or totally implanted access port were followed up to document the occurrence of catheter related thrombosis and infections. Patients received chemotherapy either for haematological malignancy or for solid tumours. Factor V Leiden (R506Q) was determined by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. Follow-up period ended in April 2007.

RESULTS

Catheter related thrombosis occurred in 4 patients (4/43; 9.3%) with a totally implanted access port. None of the 3 patients with factor V Leiden had catheter related infection or thrombosis. Catheter related infections occurred in 15 patients: 10 patients (23.3%; 10/43) with central venous catheter and 5 patients (11.6%; 5/43) with totally implanted access ports. Time to infection was 32.5 days in the central venous catheter group compared to 88 days in the totally implanted access port group.

CONCLUSION

A higher incidence of catheter related infections was observed in patients with central venous catheters in contrast to patients with totally implanted access ports were venous thrombosis was more frequent.

[Venous thromboembolism associated with long-term use of central venous catheters in cancer patients]

Increased incidence of cancers and the development of totally implanted venous access devices that contain their own port to deliver chemotherapy will lead to a greater than before numbers of central venous catheter-related thrombosis (CVCT). Medical consequences include catheter dysfunction and pulmonary embolism. Vessel injury caused by the procedure of CVC insertion is the most important risk factor for development of CVCT. This event could cause the formation of a fresh thrombus, which is reversible in the large majority of patients. In some cases, thrombus formation is not related to catheter insertion. The incidence of CVC-related DVT assessed by venography has been reported to vary from 30 to 60% but catheter-related DVT in adult patients is symptomatic in only 5% of cases. The majority of patients with CVC-related DVT is asymptomatic or has nonspecific symptoms: arm or neck swelling or pain, distal paresthesias, headache, congestion of subcutaneous collateral veins. In the case of clinical suspicion of CVC-related deep venous thrombosis (DVT), compressive ultrasonography (US), especially with doppler and color imaging, currently is first used to confirm the diagnosis. Consequently, contrast venography is reserved for clinical trials and difficult diagnostic situations. There is no consensus on the optimal management of patients with CVC-related DVT. Treatment of CVC-related VTE requires a five- to seven-day course of adjusted-dose unfractionated heparin or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) followed by oral anticoagulants. Long-term LMWH that has been shown to be more effective than oral anticoagulant in cancer patients with lower limb DVT, could be used in these patients. The efficacy and safety of pharmacologic prophylaxis for CVC related thrombosis is not established and the last recommendations suggest that clinicians not routinely use prophylaxis to try to prevent thrombosis related to long-term indwelling CVCs in cancer patients. Additional studies performed in high risk populations with appropriate dosage and timing will help to define which patients could benefit from prophylaxis.

Association between inherited thrombophilic abnormalities and central venous catheter thrombosis in patients with cancer: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is increased in cancer patients with central venous catheters (CVC). Factor (F)V Leiden and the G20210A prothrombin mutation (PTM) may play a role in causing catheter-related DVT in patients with cancer. However, information on the association between these thrombophilic abnormalities and CVC-related thrombosis are scarce.

PURPOSE

To assess the risk of CVC-related thrombosis associated with these two thrombophilic disorders.

METHODS

MEDLINE and EMBASE databases (up to March 2007); reference lists of retrieved articles. Studies comparing the prevalence of prothrombotic abnormalities in cancer patients with CVC-related thrombosis and in a control group of cancer subjects with CVC without thrombosis. Two reviewers independently selected studies and extracted study characteristics, quality and outcomes. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for each trial and pooled.

RESULTS

Ten studies involving 1000 patients were included. The pooled OR for CVC-related thrombosis was 4.6 (95% CI: 2.6, 8.1) in patients with FV Leiden. The pooled OR for CVC-related thrombosis was 4.9 (95% CI: 1.7, 14.3) in patients with PTM. The estimated attributable risk of CVC-related thrombosis was 13.1% for FV Leiden and 4.5% for PTM.

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis suggests that the presence of FV Leiden and PTM is associated with CVC-related thrombosis.

Intravascular catheter-related infections: advances in diagnosis, prevention, and management

Indwelling vascular catheters are a leading source of bloodstream infections in critically ill patients and cancer patients. Because clinical diagnostic criteria are either insensitive or non-specific, such infections are often overdiagnosed, resulting in unnecessary and wasteful removal of the catheter. Catheter-sparing diagnostic methods, such as differential quantitative blood cultures and time to positivity have emerged as reliable diagnostic techniques. Novel preventive strategies include cutaneous antisepsis, maximum sterile barrier, use of antimicrobial catheters, and antimicrobial catheter lock solution. Management of catheter-related bloodstream infections involves deciding on catheter removal, antimicrobial catheter lock solution, and the type and duration of systemic antimicrobial therapy. Such decisions depend on the identity of the organism causing the bloodstream infection, the clinical and radiographical manifestations suggesting a complicated course, the underlying condition of the host (neutropenia, thrombocytopenia), and the availability of other vascular access sites.

Prevention of catheter-related venous thrombosis with nadroparin in patients receiving chemotherapy for hematologic malignancies: a randomized, placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND

Hemato-oncology patients treated with intensive chemotherapy usually require the placement of a central venous catheter (CVC). CVCs are frequently complicated by catheter-related central venous thrombosis (CVT), which has been associated with an increased risk of pulmonary embolism and catheter-related infection.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy and safety of thromboprophylaxis with s.c. low-molecular-weight heparin (nadroparin) administered once daily in a randomized placebo-controlled, double-blind trial in patients with hematologic malignancies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients with hematologic malignancies requiring intensive chemotherapy including autologous stem cell transplantation were eligible. The patients were randomized to receive nadroparin 2850 antifactor Xa units once daily or placebo s.c. for 3 weeks. Venography was performed on day 21 after CVC insertion. Secondary outcomes were bleeding and catheter-related infection.

RESULTS

In total, 113 patients were randomized to nadroparin or placebo, and 87 patients (77%) underwent venography. In total, 11 venographically proven catheter-related CVTs were diagnosed. The frequency of catheter-related CVT was not significantly different between study groups, namely four catheter-related CVTs in the placebo group [9%; 95% CI: 0.002-0.16] vs. seven catheter-related CVTs in the nadroparin group (17%; 95% CI: 0.06-0.28). In addition, no difference in the incidence of catheter-related infection or bleeding was observed between the groups.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that the actual risk for catheter-related CVT in patients with hematologic malignancies is lower than suggested in earlier studies in cancer patients. Although prophylactic administration of nadroparin appeared to be safe in this group of patients with a high risk of bleeding, it cannot be recommended for the prevention of catheter-related CVT or catheter-related infection in patients with hematologic malignancies.

Management of Hereditary Hypercoagulable Disorders

The clinical management of individuals with hereditary hypercoaguable disorders has evolved from initial broad recommendations of lifelong anticoagulation after first event of venous thromboembolism to a more intricate individualized risk-benefit analysis as studies have begun to delineate the complexity of interactions of acquired and hereditary factors which determine the predilection to thrombosis. The contribution of thrombophilic disorders to risk of thrombotic complications of pregnancy, organ transplantation, central venous catheter and dialysis access placement have been increasingly recognized. The risk of thrombosis must be weighed against risk of long-term anticoagulation in patients with venous thromboembolism. Thrombophilia screening in select populations may enhance outcome.