Factors affecting volume reduction and red blood cell depletion of bone marrow on the COBE Spectra cell separator before haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Optimizing a fully automated and closed system process for red blood cell reduction of human bone marrow products

BACKGROUND AIMS

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation using bone marrow as the graft source is a common treatment for hematopoietic malignancies and disorders. For allogeneic transplants, processing of bone marrow requires the depletion of ABO-mismatched red blood cells (RBCs) to avoid transfusion reactions. Here the authors tested the use of an automated closed system for depleting RBCs from bone marrow and compared the results to a semi-automated platform that is more commonly used in transplant centers today. The authors found that fully automated processing using the Sepax instrument (Cytiva, Marlborough, MA, USA) resulted in depletion of RBCs and total mononuclear cell recovery that were comparable to that achieved with the COBE 2991 (Terumo BCT, Lakewood, CO, USA) semi-automated process.

METHODS

The authors optimized the fully automated and closed Sepax SmartRedux (Cytiva) protocol. Three reduction folds (10×, 12× and 15×) were tested on the Sepax. Each run was compared with the standard processing performed in the authors' center on the COBE 2991. Given that bone marrow is difficult to acquire for these purposes, the authors opted to create a surrogate that is more easily obtainable, which consisted of cryopreserved peripheral blood stem cells that were thawed and mixed with RBCs and supplemented with Plasma-Lyte A (Baxter, Deerfield, IL, USA) and 4% human serum albumin (Baxalta, Westlake Village, CA, USA). This "bone marrow-like" product was split into two starting products of approximately 600 mL, and these were loaded onto the COBE and Sepax for direct comparison testing. Samples were taken from the final products for cell counts and flow cytometry. The authors also tested a 10× Sepax reduction using human bone marrow supplemented with human liquid plasma and RBCs.

RESULTS

RBC reduction increased as the Sepax reduction rate increased, with an average of 86.06% (range of 70.85-96.39%) in the 10×, 98.80% (range of 98.1-99.5%) in the 12× and 98.89% (range of 98.80-98.89%) in the 15×. The reduction rate on the COBE ranged an average of 69.0-93.15%. However, white blood cell (WBC) recovery decreased as the Sepax reduction rate increased, with an average of 47.65% (range of 38.9-62.35%) in the 10×, 14.56% (range of 14.34-14.78%) in the 12× and 27.97% (range of 24.7-31.23%) in the 15×. COBE WBC recovery ranged an average of 53.17-76.12%. Testing a supplemented human bone marrow sample using a 10× Sepax reduction resulted in an average RBC reduction of 84.22% (range of 84.0-84.36%) and WBC recovery of 43.37% (range of 37.48-49.26%). Flow cytometry analysis also showed that 10× Sepax reduction resulted in higher purity and better recovery of CD34+, CD3+ and CD19+ cells compared with 12× and 15× reduction. Therefore, a 10× reduction rate was selected for the Sepax process.

CONCLUSIONS

The fully automated and closed SmartRedux program on the Sepax was shown to be effective at reducing RBCs from "bone marrow-like" products and a supplemented bone marrow product using a 10× reduction rate.

Optimizing haematopoietic stem and progenitor cell apheresis collection from plerixafor-mobilized patients with sickle cell disease

We adjusted haematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) apheresis collection from patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) by targeting deep buffy coat collection using medium or low collection preference (CP), and by increasing anticoagulant-citrate-dextrose-solution A dosage. In 43 HSPC collections from plerixafor-mobilized adult patients with SCD, we increased the collection efficiency to 35.79% using medium CP and 82.23% using low CP. Deep buffy coat collection increased red blood cell contamination of the HSPC product, the product haematocrit was 4.7% with medium CP and 6.4% with low CP. These adjustments were well-tolerated and allowed efficient HSPC collection from SCD patients.

Challenges of Cellular Therapy During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Currently, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread worldwide and continues to rise. There remains a significant unmet need for patients with hematological malignancies requiring specialized procedures and treatments, like cellular therapy to treat or cure their disease. For instance, chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy is approved for relapsed/refractory (after two or more lines of therapy) diffuse large B cell lymphoma and B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia that is refractory or in the second relapse in patients younger than 25 years of age. Similarly, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) can be a lifesaving procedure for many patients, such as those with acute myeloid leukemia with high-risk cytogenetics. Unfortunately, the COVID-19 pandemic has thrust upon the hematologists and transplant specialists' unique challenges with the implementation and management of cellular therapy. One of the significant concerns regarding this immunocompromised patient population is the significant risk of acquiring SARS-CoV-2 infection due to its highly contagious nature. Experts have recommended that if medically indicated, especially in high-risk disease (where chemotherapy is unlikely to work), these lifesaving procedures should not be delayed even during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, proceeding with CAR-T cell therapy and HSCT during the pandemic is a considerable task and requires dedication from the transplant team and buy-in from the patients and their family or support system. Open conversations should be held with the patients about the risks involved in undergoing cellular therapies during current times and the associated future uncertainties.

A comparison of two protocols for optimal red blood cell depletion using Sepax-2 device for ABO-major incompatible transplantation in adults

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

In ABO-incompatible bone marrow transplantation, an efficient depletion of red blood cells (RBC) within the graft is mandatory to avoid adverse events in transplanted patients. Using non therapeutic products, we evaluated the substitution of the standard density gradient-based separation (DGBS) over Ficoll-Paque with the use of an automated procedure intended for buffy coat only (SmartRedux software) introducing modifications within the settings to achieve a drastic reduction of the initial volume of the product. Both methods were conducted on the Sepax-2 device.

SAMPLES AND METHODS

RBC depletion rates and CD34+ cells recoveries from eight procedures with SmartRedux software using "in-house" settings (method A) were compared to those obtained from four procedures using NeatCell software, an automated DGBS over Ficoll-Paque (method B).

RESULTS

Median erythrocyte depletion of 95,4% (92,7%-99,0%) and 99,8% (99,0%-99,9%) were observed using methods A and B, respectively. Median residual RBC volumes in the final product were 19 mL (4,4 mL-31,2 mL) and 0,7 mL (0,4 mL-4,7 mL), respectively (p = 0,014). CD34+ cells recoveries of 90,9% (62,7%-102,1%) and 78,4% (64,1%-86,2%) were achieved for methods A and B. Median platelet depletion was 16,6% (10%-42,7%) and 89,8% (88,5%-92,4%) using methods A and B, respectively (p = 0,004). Processing duration was shorter using method A (168 ± 29 min) than method B (295 ± 21 min) (p = 0,004).

CONCLUSION

Both methods achieved satisfactory erythrocyte depletion and CD34+ recovery. The use of Sepax-2 device in association with SmartRedux software could be extended to efficiently deplete RBC from large-volume BM in a raw instead of DGBS.

Erythrocyte depletion from bone marrow: performance evaluation after 50 clinical-scale depletions with Spectra Optia BMC

BACKGROUND

Red blood cell (RBC) depletion is a standard graft manipulation technique for ABO-incompatible bone marrow (BM) transplants. The BM processing module for Spectra Optia, "BMC", was previously introduced. We here report the largest series to date of routine quality data after performing 50 clinical-scale RBC-depletions.

METHODS

Fifty successive RBC-depletions from autologous (n = 5) and allogeneic (n = 45) BM transplants were performed with the Spectra Optia BMC apheresis suite. Product quality was assessed before and after processing for volume, RBC and leukocyte content; RBC-depletion and stem cell (CD34+ cells) recovery was calculated there from. Clinical engraftment data were collected from 26/45 allogeneic recipients.

RESULTS

Median RBC removal was 98.2% (range 90.8-99.1%), median CD34+ cell recovery was 93.6%, minimum recovery being 72%, total product volume was reduced to 7.5% (range 4.7-23.0%). Products engrafted with expected probability and kinetics. Performance indicators were stable over time.

DISCUSSION

Spectra Optia BMC is a robust and efficient technology for RBC-depletion and volume reduction of BM, providing near-complete RBC removal and excellent CD34+ cell recovery.

Donor and recipient age, gender and ABO incompatibility regardless of donor source: validated criteria for donor selection for haematopoietic transplants

Prior data indicate similar outcomes after transplants from human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-haplotype-matched relatives, HLA-identical siblings and HLA-matched unrelated donors. We used our prospective data set to answer a clinically important question: who is the best donor for a person with acute leukaemia transplanted in first complete remission. Patients were randomly divided into training (n=611) and validation (n=588) sets. A total of 1199 consecutive subjects received a transplant from an HLA-haplotype-matched relative using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and anti-thymocyte globulin (n=685) or an HLA-identical sibling (n=514); 3-year leukaemia-free survivals (LFSs) were 75 and 74% (P=0.95), respectively. The multivariate model identified three major risk factors for transplant-related mortality (TRM): older donor/recipient age, female-to-male transplants and donor-recipient ABO major-mismatch transplants. A risk score was developed based on these three features. TRMs were 8%, 15% and 31% for subjects with scores of 0-1, 2 and 3, respectively, (P<0.001). Three-year LFSs were 78%, 74% and 58%, respectively, (P=0.003). The risk score was validated in an independent cohort. In conclusion, our data confirm donor source is not significantly correlated with transplant outcomes. Selection of the best donor needs to consider donor-recipient age, matching for gender and ABO incompatibility among persons with acute leukaemia receiving related transplants under our transplant modality.

An update on ABO incompatible hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation

Hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) transplantation has long been established as the optimal treatment for many hematologic malignancies. In the setting of allogenic HLA matched HPC transplantation, greater than 50% of unrelated donors and 30% of related donors demonstrate some degree of ABO incompatibility (ABOi), which is classified in one of three ways: major, minor, or bidirectional. Major ABOi refers to the presence of recipient isoagglutinins against the donor's A and/or B antigen. Minor ABOi occurs when the HPC product contains the isoagglutinins targeting the recipient's A and/or B antigen. Bidirectional refers to the presence of both major and minor ABOi. Major adverse events associated with ABOi HPC transplantation includes acute and delayed hemolysis, pure red cell aplasia, and delayed engraftment. ABOi HPC transplantation poses a unique challenge to the clinical transplantation unit, the HPC processing lab, and the transfusion medicine service. Therefore, it is essential that these services actively communicate with one another to ensure patient safety. This review will attempt to globally address the challenges related to ABOi HPC transplantation, with an increased focus on aspects related to the laboratory and transfusion medicine services.

How do we choose the best donor for T-cell-replete, HLA-haploidentical transplantation?

In haploidentical stem cell transplantations (haplo-SCT), nearly all patients have more than one donor. A key issue in the haplo-SCT setting is the search for the best donor, because donor selection can significantly impact the incidences of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease, transplant-related mortality, and relapse, in addition to overall survival. In this review, we focused on factors associated with transplant outcomes following unmanipulated haplo-SCT with anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) or after T-cell-replete haplo-SCT with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PT/Cy). We summarized the effects of the primary factors, including donor-specific antibodies against human leukocyte antigens (HLA); donor age and gender; killer immunoglobulin-like receptor-ligand mismatches; and non-inherited maternal antigen mismatches. We also offered some expert recommendations and proposed an algorithm for selecting donors for unmanipulated haplo-SCT with ATG and for T-cell-replete haplo-SCT with PT/Cy.

Human bone marrow processing using a new continuous-flow cell separation device

BACKGROUND

Processing of bone marrow (BM) is often required to remove incompatible red blood cells (RBCs) or to reduce the volume before transplantation or cryopreservation. We have evaluated the Spectra Optia apheresis system to determine its effectiveness in volume reduction and RBC depletion of human BM before transplantation.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

BM from 30 donations (28 allogeneic and two autologous) were processed using the Spectra Optia over a 12-month period. The mean BM collection volume was 1094 ± 337 mL and RBC volume was 374 ± 148 mL. Processing using the Spectra Optia was as described by the manufacturer.

RESULTS

Volume reduction achieved was 93.0 ± 1.2%; RBC depletion was 98.8 ± 0.4%; and mononuclear, CD34+, and CD3+ cell recoveries were 79.12 ± 14.03, 88.36 ± 13.76, and 79.84 ± 16.27%, respectively. In total 26 of 28 processed allografts were transplanted; 24 achieved neutrophil engraftment in 20.7 ± 5.9 days and 18 achieved platelet engraftment in 19.6 ± 8.9 days. Time in transit significantly affected the Spectra Optia's ability to recover mononuclear, CD34+, and CD3+ cells, and the overall age of the BM at the time of processing significantly affected the recovery of mononuclear and CD3+ cells, but not CD34+ cells. Time in storage at 2 to 6°C had no adverse effect on processing.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that the Spectra Optia can effectively volume reduce and RBC deplete human BM before transplantation. Time in transit should be as short as possible but may be extended up to 24 hours if the donation is refrigerated during transit.

Red blood cell depletion from bone marrow and peripheral blood buffy coat: a comparison of two new and three established technologies

BACKGROUND

Red blood cell (RBC) depletion is a standard technique for preparation of ABO-incompatible bone marrow transplants (BMTs). Density centrifugation or apheresis are used successfully at clinical scale. The advent of a bone marrow (BM) processing module for the Spectra Optia (Terumo BCT) provided the initiative to formally compare our standard technology, the COBE2991 (Ficoll, manual, "C") with the Spectra Optia BMP (apheresis, semiautomatic, "O"), the Sepax II NeatCell (Ficoll, automatic, "S"), the Miltenyi CliniMACS Prodigy density gradient separation system (Ficoll, automatic, "P"), and manual Ficoll ("M"). C and O handle larger product volumes than S, P, and M.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Technologies were assessed for RBC depletion, target cell (mononuclear cells [MNCs] for buffy coats [BCs], CD34+ cells for BM) recovery, and cost/labor. BC pools were simultaneously purged with C, O, S, and P; five to 18 BM samples were sequentially processed with C, O, S, and M.

RESULTS

Mean RBC removal with C was 97% (BCs) or 92% (BM). From both products, O removed 97%, and P, S, and M removed 99% of RBCs. MNC recovery from BC (98% C, 97% O, 65% P, 74% S) or CD34+ cell recovery from BM (92% C, 90% O, 67% S, 70% M) were best with C and O. Polymorphonuclear cells (PMNs) were depleted from BCs by P, S, and C, while O recovered 50% of PMNs. Time savings compared to C or M for all tested technologies are considerable.

CONCLUSION

All methods are in principle suitable and can be selected based on sample volume, available technology, and desired product specifications beyond RBC depletion and MNC and/or CD34+ cell recovery.

Storage time affects umbilical cord blood viability

BACKGROUND

Cryopreserved umbilical cord blood (CB) is increasingly used as a cell source to reconstitute marrow in hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients. Delays in cryopreservation may adversely affect cell viability, thereby reducing their potential for engraftment after transplantation.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The impact of delayed cryopreservation for up to 3 days on the viability of both CD45+ and CD34+ cell populations in 28 CB donations with volumes of 58.40 ± 15.4 mL (range, 39.4-107.4 mL) was investigated to establish whether precryopreservation storage time could be extended from our current time of 24 to 48 hours in line with other CB banks. Viability was assessed on 3 consecutive days, both before and after cryopreservation, by flow cytometry using 7-aminoactinomycin D (7-AAD) and annexin V methods.

RESULTS

The results using 7-AAD and annexin V indicated the viability of CD34+ cells before cryopreservation remained high (>92.33 ± 4.11%) over 3 days, whereas the viability of CD45+ cells decreased from 86.36 ± 4.97% to 66.24 ± 7.78% (p < 0.0001) by Day 3. Storage time significantly affected the viability of CD34+ cells after cryopreservation. Using 7-AAD, the mean CD34+ cell viability decreased by approximately 5% per extra day in storage from 84.30 ± 6.27% on Day 1 to 79.01 ± 7.44% (p < 0.0057) on Day 2 and to 73.95 ± 7.54% (p < 0.0001) on Day 3. With annexin V staining CD34+ cell viability fell by approximately 7% per extra day in storage from 77.17 ± 8.47% on Day 1 to 69.56 ± 13.30% (p < 0.0194) on Day 2 and to 62.89 ± 15.22% (p < 0.0002) on Day 3.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that extended precryopreservation storage adversely affects viability and should be avoided.

Bone marrow processing for transplantation using Cobe Spectra cell separator

Concentration of bone marrow aspirates is an important prerequisite prior to infusion of ABO incompatible allogeneic marrow and prior to cryopreservation and storage of autologous marrow. In this paper we present our experience in processing 15 harvested bone marrow for ABO incompatible allogeneic and autologous bone marrow (BM) transplantation using Cobe Spectra® cell separator. BM processing resulted in the median recovery of 91.5% CD34+ cells, erythrocyte depletion of 91% and volume reduction of 81%. BM processing using cell separator is safe and effective technique providing high rate of erythrocyte depletion and volume reduction, and acceptable recovery of the CD34+ cells.

Donor selection in T cell-replete haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: knowns, unknowns, and controversies

Multiple donors are generally available for haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Here we discuss the factors that should be considered when selecting donors for this type of transplantation according to the currently available evidence. Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) increase the risk of graft failure and should be avoided whenever possible. Strategies to manage recipients with DSAs are discussed. One should choose a full haplotype mismatch rather than a better-matched donor and maximize the dose of infused hematopoietic cells. Donor age and sex are other important factors. Other factors, including predicted natural killer cell alloreactivity and consideration of noninherited maternal alleles, are more controversial. Larger studies are needed to further clarify the role of these factors for donor selection in haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Storage of hemopoietic stem cells

BACKGROUND

Autologous, and in some cases allogeneic, hemopoietic stem cells (HSC) are stored for varying periods of time prior to infusion. For periods of greater than 48 h, storage requires cryopreservation. It is essential to optimize cell storage and ensure the quality of the product for subsequent reinfusion.

METHODS

A number of important variables may affect the subsequent quality of infused HSC and therapeutic cells (TC). This review discusses these and also reviews the regulatory framework that now aims to ensure the quality of stem cells and TC for transplantation.

RESULTS

Important variables included cell concentration, temperature, interval from collection to cryopreservation, manipulations performed. They also included rate of freezing and whether controlled-rate freezing was employed. Parameters studied were type of cryoprotectant utilized [dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) is most commonly used, sometimes in combination with hydroxyethyl starch (HES)]; and storage conditions. It is also important to assess the quality of stored stem cells. Measurements employed included the total cell count (TNC), mononuclear cell count (MNC), CD34+ cells and colony-forming units - granulocyte macrophage (CFU-GM). Of these, TNC and CD34+ are the most useful. However, the best measure of the quality of stored stem cells is their subsequent engraftment. The quality systems used in stem cell laboratories are described in the guidance of the Joint Accreditation Committee of ISCT (Europe) and the EBMT (JACIE) and the EU Directive on Tissues and Cells plus its supporting commission directives. Inspections of facilities are carried out by the appropriate national agencies and JACIE.

CONCLUSION

For high-quality storage of HSC and TC, processing facilities should use validated procedures that take into account critical variables. The quality of all products must be assessed before and after storage.

Transportation of cellular therapy products: report of a survey by the cellular therapies team of the Biomedical Excellence for Safer Transfusion (BEST) collaborative

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Most cell therapy products (CTP) are infused or processed shortly after collection but in some cases this may be delayed for up to 48 h. A number of variables such as temperature and cell concentration are of critical importance for the integrity of CTP during this time.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a survey of cellular therapy laboratories to ascertain current practices for CTP transportation.

RESULTS

There were 194 respondents of whom 90% shipped or received CTP--84% allogeneic, 71% autologous and 62% therapeutic cells. Processing facilities shipped or received the following products--hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC), Marrow 73%; HPC, Apheresis 90%; HPC, Cord Blood 54% and others 14%. Other CTP included donor lymphocytes, mesenchymal stem cells (MSC), natural killer cells, buffy coat neutrophils and virus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL). More than 70% of respondents believed that it was acceptable for CTP to be held for up to 2 h without checking the temperature or cell density and a similar proportion agreed that putting products in containers to control parameters such as temperature within this time period was unnecessary. The majority of centres shipped or received between 1 and 10 CTP annually and 66% received products taking more than 2 h to ship. Of these, 82% specified the conditions for temperature in transit whilst 57% monitored temperature in transit and 74% of these used a data logger. The temperature range most commonly specified was 18-24 degrees C. The majority of processing facilities did not request an adjustment to the cell density even for products taking more than 2 h to reach their facility. More than 90% of respondents tested HPC for CD34(+) cells, viability and sterility; 40-48% performed colony-forming unit-granulocyte macrophage (CFU-GM) analysis. Only viability was thought by > 50% of respondents to be impacted by temperature, cell density and other parameters.

CONCLUSION

Understanding current practice will help in the design of future studies for CTP storage and transportation.

Red blood units collected from bone marrow harvests after mononuclear cell selection qualify for autologous use

BACKGROUND

After large volume bone marrow (BM) harvest, donors and patients can develop severe anaemia, because collected BM can contain up to 20% of their red cell mass. In a prospective analysis, we investigated the feasibility to recover red blood cells (RBCs) from the harvested BM and investigated whether these RBC units meet the quality requirements of the European Council.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 19 patients (median age 51 yrs, range 31-77) with acute myocardial infarction, who participated in the MYSTAR study, a median volume of 1299 ml (range, 700-1870 ml) BM was collected. During BM processing, mononuclear cells (MNC) were separated using the Cobe Spectra apheresis system and the residual RBCs were collected in a separate bag. The quality of the collected RBCs was assessed by measuring LDH, free haemoglobin, potassium and lactate. Haemolysis was calculated and the intracellular concentration of ATP, ADP, AMP was determined by HPLC.

RESULTS

RBC units recovered from BM after MNC separation had a mean volume of 312 +/- 95 ml with a haematocrit of 47 +/- 8.9%, a haemoglobin content of 51 +/- 15 g per unit, a haemolysis of 0.15 +/- 0.005%, a pH of 6.8 +/- 0.007 and an intracellular ATP concentration of 135 pmol/10(6) RBC +/- 41, which is comparable with freshly collected packed red blood cells (PRBCs).

CONCLUSION

RBCs, collected from bone marrow harvests, can be used for autologous blood support to minimize allogeneic blood transfusions in donors and patients after large volume BM donation.

Cryopreservation of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells for therapeutic use

To date, more than 25,000 hematopoietic transplants have been carried out across Europe for hematological disorders, the majority being for hematological malignancies. At least 70% of these are autologous transplants, the remaining 30% being allogeneic, which are sourced from related (70% of the allogeneic) or unrelated donors. Peripheral blood mobilized with granulocyte colony stimulating factor is the major source of stem cells for transplantation, being used in approx 95% of autologous transplants and in approx 65% of allogeneic transplants. Other cell sources used for transplantation are bone marrow and umbilical cord blood. One crucial advance in the treatment of these disorders has been the development of the ability to cryopreserve hematopoietic stem cells for future transplantation. For bone marrow and mobilized peripheral blood, the majority of cryopreserved harvests come from autologous collections that are stored prior to a planned infusion following further treatment of the patient or at the time of a subsequent relapse. Other autologous harvests are stored as backup or "rainy day" harvests, the former specifically being intended to rescue patients who develop graft failure following an allogeneic transplant or who may require this transplant at a later date. Allogeneic bone marrow and mobilized peripheral blood are less often cryopreserved than autologous harvests. This is in contrast to umbilical cord blood that may be banked for directed or sibling (related) hematopoietic stem cell transplants, for allogeneic unrelated donations, and for autologous donations. Allogeneic unrelated donations are of particular use for providing a source of hematopoietic stem cells for ethnic minorities, patients with rare human leukocyte antigen types, or where the patient urgently requires a transplant and cannot wait for the weeks to months required to prepare a bone marrow donor. There are currently more than 200,000 banked umbilical cord blood units registered with the Bone Marrow Donors Worldwide registry. In this chapter, we describe several protocols that we have used to cryopreserve these different sources of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells, keeping in mind that the protocols may vary among transplant processing centers.

The role of blood services and regulatory bodies in stem cell transplantation

Advances in stem cell research over the past few decades have coincided with large increases in haemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) using either bone marrow, peripheral blood or cord blood-derived stem cells. Alongside this growth has come an increase in the role played by regulatory bodies, both governmental and professional, to ensure that those undertaking such procedures do so in a manner so as to minimize the risk to patients. Interestingly, government legislation encompasses not only cellular therapies, but also the use of tissues and organs, as many of the processes and procurement procedures involved are similar. In this review, we analyse the trends in HSCT, describe the development and impact of legislation within Europe on this practice and outline the vital role played by the UK blood services in providing robust and high-quality HSCT services.

Directed sibling cord blood banking for transplantation: the 10-year experience in the national blood service in England

Umbilical cord blood (UCB) is an important source of hematopoietic stem cells for transplantation. Although UCB is often collected from unrelated donors, directed umbilical cord blood (DCB) from sibling donors also provides an important source of UCB for transplantation. This report summarizes the experience in collection, testing, storage, and transplantation of DCB units by the National Blood Service for England and North Wales over 10 years. Eligibility for collection was based on an existing sibling suffering from a disease that may be treated by stem cell transplantation or a family history that could result in the birth of a sibling with a disease that could be treated by stem cell transplantation. Collections were made on the provision that the sibling's clinician was willing to financially support the collection and to take responsibility for medical review of the mother and potential recipient. Given the high investment in UCB banking and the introduction of new regulations and mandatory licensing under the European Union Tissues and Cells Directive and those proposed in the U.S., this report details the procedures that we have used for DCB donations, the outcome data where donations have been used for transplantation, and it provides some timely recommendations for best practices. Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest is found at the end of this article.

Impact of harvest product volume in erythrocyte depletion of allogeneic or autologous bone marrow using COBE spectra

Depletion of bone marrow (BM) from erythrocytes is used to prevent early hemolysis in major ABO incompatible allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (Allo-HCT). This method was also strongly recommended before storing of autologous and even allo-BM for volume reduction in order to prevent early hemolysis and DMSO toxicity after infusion. In our center, erythrocyte depletion of BM harvests has been performed on a continuous flow cell separator, which used a closed system with a high mononuclear cell (MNC) yield and low rate of erythrocyte contamination. According to the protocol of a cellular therapy approach in a cardiovascular collaborative study we have to adopt the process to lower volumes. We aimed to compare our results with standard volume (SV) (historical control) to low volume ED procedures.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Data has been collected from the last five years. We analyzed 28 cases in the SV group (BM volume >750ml) and 39 cases in the low volume (LV) group. Nineteen of these cases were allogeneic, and 48 were autologous procedures. We used the software COBE PBSC coll vers 5.1 and a standard disposable set (Gambro BCT, Lakewood, USA) for the procedure, and simultaneously, a double bag system with intermediate connectors were used to overcome re-circulation (COBE Spectra Bone Marrow Processing Set, Lakewood USA).

RESULTS

The mean volume reduction was 88% (range, 84.4-93.5%) for SV and 90.8% (range, 87.2-91.3%) for the LV group. We did not find any significant difference for MNC yield, volume reduction rate and CD34+ cell recovery between the SV and LV group. There were no complications experienced with regards to device or technical difficulties during procedures. Acute massive intravascular hemolysis was not observed in allogeneic recipients.

CONCLUSION

ED and volume reduction with COBE spectra produced successful results in standard and low harvest volumes. This process can be successfully applied to lower volumes and comparable results to the SV harvest can be achieved for the ED rate, reduction of volume and recovery of MNCs and CD34+ cells.