Impact on the cytomegalovirus (CMV) viral load by CMV-specific T-cell immunity in recipients of allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Immune Control of Human Cytomegalovirus (HCMV) Infection in HCMV-Seropositive Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: The Predictive Role of Different Immunological Assays

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection remains a major complication for solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs). The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of HCMV-specific T cell immunity measured at the time of the HCMV-DNA peak in predicting the spontaneous clearance of infection. The performance of cytokine flow cytometry using infected dendritic cells (CFC-iDC), infected cell lysate (CFC-iCL) and pp65 peptide pool (CFC-pp65 pool) as stimuli, as well as ELISPOT assays using infected cell lysate (ELISPOT-iCL) and the pp65 peptide pool (ELISPOT-pp65 pool), was analysed. Among the 40 SOTRs enrolled, 16 patients (40%) required antiviral treatment for an HCMV infection (Non-Controllers), while the others spontaneously cleared the infection (Controllers). At the HCMV-DNA peak, the number of HCMV-specific CD4+ T cells detected by the CFC-iDC, CFC-iCL and CFC-pp65 pool assays in Controllers was higher than that detected in Non-Controllers, while no difference was observed in terms of HCMV-specific CD8+ T cell response. The same trend was observed when the HCMV-specific T cell response was measured by ELISPOT-iCL and ELISPOT-pp65 pool. We observed that the CD4+ CFC-pp65 pool assay was the best predictor of self-resolving HCMV infection at the time of the HCVM-DNA peak. The CFC-pp65 pool assay is able to discriminate between CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses and could be used in daily clinical practice.

Impaired T cells and "memory-like" NK-cell reconstitution is linked to late-onset HCMV reactivation after letermovir cessation

ABSTRACT

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) is the only cure for many hematologic malignancies. However, alloSCT recipients are susceptible to opportunistic pathogens, such as human cytomegalovirus (HCMV). Letermovir prophylaxis has revolutionized HCMV management, but the challenge of late HCMV reactivations has emerged. Immunological surrogates of clinically significant HCMV infection (csCMVi) after discontinuation of letermovir remain to be defined. Therefore, we studied natural killer (NK)-cell reconstitution along with the global and HCMV pp65-specific T-cell repertoire of 24 alloSCT recipients at 7 time points before (day +90) and after (days +120-270) cessation of letermovir prophylaxis. Patients who experienced csCMVi had lower counts of IFN-γ+ HCMV-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells than HCMV controllers. Furthermore, patients with csCMVi displayed late impairment of NK-cell reconstitution, especially suppression of "memory-like" CD159c+CD56dim NK-cell counts that preceded csCMVi events in most patients. Moreover, several surrogates of immune reconstitution were associated with the severity of HCMV manifestation, with patients suffering from HCMV end-organ disease and/or refractory HCMV infection harboring least HCMV-specific T cells and "memory-like" NK cells. Altogether, our findings establish an association of delayed or insufficient proliferation of both HCMV-specific T cells and "memory-like" NK cells with csCMVi and the severity of HCMV manifestations after discontinuation of letermovir prophylaxis.

Secretion of IFN-γ by specific T cells in HCMV infection

One major risk for recipients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants (allo-HSCTs) is infection with the human cytomegalovirus (HCMV). For HCMV treatment, it is especially crucial to be able to differentiate between recipients who are at high risk of reactivation and those who are not. In this study, HCMV-DNA was collected from 60 HLA-A*02 allo-HSCT recipients before and after transplantation. After transplantation, the release of interferon (IFN)-γ by T cells specific to HCMV was assessed using the enzyme-linked immunospot assay (ELISPOT). The results show that the median viral load (VL) was significantly higher in the HCMV persistent-infection group compared to the non-persistent-infection group (p = 0.002), and that the late-infection rate was considerably higher in the high-VL group compared to the low-VL group (p = 0.014). The uninfected group had a considerably higher median IFN-γ spot-forming cell (SFC) count than the persistent-infection group (p = 0.001), and IFN-γ SFC counts correlated negatively and linearly with VLs (r = -0.397, p = 0.002). The immune-response groups showed significantly difference in median VL (p = 0.018), and the high immune response group had a reduced late-infection rate than the no/low immune response groups (p = 0.049). Our study showed that allo-HSCT recipients with a high VL at an early transplantation stage were at high risk for late HCMV infection. Further HCMV reactivation can be prevented by HCMV-specific T cells secreting enough IFN-γ.

Epidemiology of cytomegalovirus antiviral resistance testing for solid organ and bone marrow transplant patients from 2011 - 2019

BACKGROUND

CMV reactivation post-transplantation is common, with need for prompt identification of patients most at-risk for CMV antiviral drug resistance (AVDR).

OBJECTIVES

This study describes CMV AVDR frequencies, antiviral prescribing practices, and AVDR risk factors in patients from 2011 to 2019 in British Columbia, Canada.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of demographics, transplant type, viral loads, antiviral exposure duration, and 12-month mortality was conducted for all patients with samples submitted for CMV AVDR testing from 2011 to 2019. Genotyping of AVDR mutations occurred at the national reference laboratory. Mann-Whitney U, T-test or Fisher's exact tests examined differences between patients with and without AVDR.

RESULTS

Fifty-three plasma and three tissue/fluid specimens successfully underwent CMV AVDR testing; of these samples, 27/56 (48%) had AVDR mutations detected. The commonest AVDR mutations were at UL97 loci A594 (20%), H596 (12%) and L595 (12%). Mutations occurred more frequently in requests from solid organ than hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients (58% vs. 27%, p = 0.05). Previous resistance testing was a significant risk factor for AVDR (p < 0.001). Patients with AVDR had approximately 51 more days of antiviral therapy (p = 0.007) and took 9 days longer to clear viremia (p = 0.23). The median turnaround time from sample send-out to reporting was nine days. However, empiric use of second-line antivirals occurred in most cases (39/53, 74%) before results were available.

DISCUSSION

Laboratories should strive to provide timely CMV AVDR testing for transplant patients, to minimize unnecessary exposure to second-line antiviral agents. The findings of this study may help guide clinicians when selecting empiric antiviral therapy.

CD4+ T cells are the major predictor of HCMV control in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients on letermovir prophylaxis

Introduction

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) causes significant morbidity and mortality in allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT) recipients. Recently, antiviral letermovir prophylaxis during the first 100 days after alloSCT replaced PCR-guided preemptive therapy as the primary standard of care for HCMV reactivations. Here, we compared NK-cell and T-cell reconstitution in alloSCT recipients receiving preemptive therapy or letermovir prophylaxis in order to identify potential biomarkers predicting prolonged and symptomatic HCMV reactivation.

Methods

To that end, the NK-cell and T-cell repertoire of alloSCT recipients managed with preemptive therapy (n=32) or letermovir prophylaxis (n=24) was characterized by flow cytometry on days +30, +60, +90 and +120 after alloSCT. Additionally, background-corrected HCMV-specific T-helper (CD4+IFNγ+) and cytotoxic (CD8+IFNγ+CD107a+) T cells were quantified after pp65 stimulation.

Results

Compared to preemptive therapy, letermovir prophylaxis prevented HCMV reactivation and decreased HCMV peak viral loads until days +120 and +365. Letermovir prophylaxis resulted in decreased T-cell numbers but increased NK-cell numbers. Interestingly, despite the inhibition of HCMV, we found high numbers of "memory-like" (CD56dimFcεRIγ- and/or CD159c+) NK cells and an expansion of HCMV-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in letermovir recipients. We further compared immunological readouts in patients on letermovir prophylaxis with non/short-term HCMV reactivation (NSTR) and prolonged/symptomatic HCMV reactivation (long-term HCMV reactivation, LTR). Median HCMV-specific CD4+ T-cell frequencies were significantly higher in NSTR patients (day +60, 0.35 % vs. 0.00 % CD4+IFNγ+/CD4+ cells, p=0.018) than in patients with LTR, whereas patients with LTR had significantly higher median regulatory T-cell (Treg) frequencies (day +90, 2.2 % vs. 6.2 % CD4+CD25+CD127dim/CD4+ cells, p=0.019). ROC analysis confirmed low HCMV specific CD4+ (AUC on day +60: 0.813, p=0.019) and high Treg frequencies (AUC on day +90: 0.847, p=0.021) as significant predictors of prolonged and symptomatic HCMV reactivation.

Discussion

Taken together, letermovir prophylaxis delays HCMV reactivation and alters NK- and T-cell reconstitution. High numbers of HCMV-specific CD4+ T cells and low numbers of Tregs seem to be pivotal to suppress post-alloSCT HCMV reactivation during letermovir prophylaxis. Administration of more advanced immunoassays that include Treg signature cytokines might contribute to the identification of patients at high-risk for long-term and symptomatic HCMV reactivation who might benefit from prolonged administration of letermovir.

The Ten Most Common Questions on Cytomegalovirus Infection in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Patients

With the rising number of patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), clinicians are more likely to encounter infectious complications in immunocompromised hosts, particularly cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Besides the high mortality of CMV end-organ disease, patients with detectable CMV viremia may have worse outcomes and decreased survival even in the absence of end-organ disease. In view of the implications on morbidity and mortality, clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion and initiate antiviral drugs promptly when CMV infection is confirmed. High-risk patients should be identified in order to provide optimal management. Additionally, novel antiviral agents with a good safety profile and minor adverse events are now available for prophylaxis in high-risk patients and for treatment of resistant or refractory CMV infection. The following review provides concise, yet comprehensive, guidance on the burden and risk factors of CMV in this population, as well as an update on the latest evidence for the management of CMV infection.

Patient risk stratification and tailored clinical management of post-transplant CMV-, EBV-, and BKV-infections by monitoring virus-specific T-cell immunity

Background

Despite routine post-transplant viral monitoring and pre-emptive therapy, viral infections remain a major cause of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation-related morbidity and mortality.

Objective

We here aimed to prospectively assess the kinetics and the magnitude of cytomegalovirus-(CMV), Epstein Barr virus-(EBV), and BK virus-(BKV)-specific T cell responses post-transplant and evaluate their role in guiding therapeutic decisions by patient risk-stratification.

Study design

The tri-virus-specific immune recovery was assessed by Elispot, in 50 consecutively transplanted patients, on days +20, +30, +60, +100, +150, +200 post-transplant and in case of reactivation, weekly for 1 month.

Results

The great majority of the patients experienced at least one reactivation, while over 40% of them developed multiple reactivations from more than one of the tested viruses, especially those transplanted from matched or mismatched unrelated donors. The early reconstitution of virus-specific immunity (day +20), favorably correlated with transplant outcomes. Εxpanding levels of CMV-, EBV-, and BKV-specific T cells (VSTs) post-reactivation coincided with decreasing viral load and control of infection. Certain cut-offs of absolute VST numbers or net VST cell expansion post-reactivation were determined, above which, patients with CMV or BKV reactivation had >90% probability of complete response (CR).

Conclusion

Immune monitoring of virus-specific T-cell reconstitution post-transplant may allow risk-stratification of virus reactivating patients and enable patient-tailored treatment. The identification of individuals with high probability of CR will minimize unnecessary overtreatment and drug-associated toxicity while allowing candidates for pre-emptive intervention with adoptive transfer of VSTs to be appropriately selected.

ELISPOT assay of interferon-γ secretion for evaluating human cytomegalovirus reactivation risk in allo-HSCT recipients

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is a common cause of significant morbidity and mortality in transplant recipients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). We evaluated interferon-γ (IFN-γ) secretion by HCMV NLV-specific CD8⁺ T cells in HCMV-reactivated allo-HSCT recipients using an enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assay at 3 months post-transplantation. Blood samples from 47 recipients were tested for HCMV DNAemia, HCMV pp65 antigenemia, and anti-HCMV immunoglobulins (IgG/IgM) over 3 months post-transplantation. Of the 47 transplant recipients, 26 were HLA-A*02 positive and 21 were HLA-A*02 negative. The results were essentially consistent between the 47 transplant recipients and the HLA-A*02-positive recipients. HCMV DNAemia was not linearly correlated with IFN-γ spot-forming cells (SFCs) counts; IFN-γ SFCs counts did not differ significantly between the HCMV DNAemia-positive and -negative groups, whereas the HCMV-DNA virus loads were inversely correlated with the IFN-γ SFCs counts. HCMV pp65 antigenemia was not linearly correlated with IFN-γ SFCs counts; IFN-γ SFCs counts in the HCMV pp65 antigenemia-positive and -negative groups were similar. More IFN-γ SFCs counts were detected in transplant recipients with high anti-HCMV-IgG antibody titers than in those with low anti-HCMV-IgG titers pre-transplantation in the 47 recipients. Anti-HCMV-IgG antibody titers were positively linearly correlated with IFN-γ SFCs counts in HLA-A*02-positive recipients. The HCMV infection indicators used to monitor HCMV reactivation had different values in transplant recipients. The use of the IFN-γ SFCs counts measured by ELISPOT to evaluate the risk of HCMV reactivation needs further study.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Cell-Mediated Immunity and CMV Infection After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: The REACT Study

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) recipients. CMV cell-mediated immunity (CMV-CMI) as determined by a peptide-based enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) CMV assay may identify patients at risk for clinically significant CMV infection (CS-CMVi).

METHODS

The CS-CMVi was defined as CMV viremia and/or disease necessitating antiviral therapy. CMV-CMI was characterized as high when the intermediate-early 1 (IE-1) antigen spot counts (SPCs) were >100 (cutoff 1) or when the IE-1 and phosphoprotein 65 antigen SPCs were both >100 SPCs per 250 000 cells (cutoff 2), and a low CMV-CMI when SPCs were below these thresholds. In this prospective multicenter study, we evaluated CMV-CMI every 2 weeks from the pretransplant period until 6 months posttransplantation in 241 allo-HCT recipients with positive CMV serostatus. The primary endpoint was CS-CMVi occurring within 2 weeks of the last measurement of CMV-CMI.

RESULTS

CS-CMVi occurred in 70 allo-HCT recipients (29%). CMV-CMI was low in patients who experienced CS-CMVi (94%), whereas those who had a high CMV-CMI were less likely to have CS-CMVi (P < .0001). Patients with CS-CMVi had higher all-cause mortality (P = .007), especially those with low CMV-CMI (P = .035). On multivariable analysis, CMV-CMI, sex, race, antithymocyte globulin, and steroid use were independent predictors of CS-CMVi, and the time from transplant to engraftment was the only predictor of mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Measurement of CMV-CMI using a novel ELISPOT assay would be useful clinically to monitor allo-HCT recipients and distinguish between those at risk of developing CS-CMVi and requiring antiviral prophylaxis or therapy and those who are protected.

The CD4+ T Cell Response to Human Cytomegalovirus in Healthy and Immunocompromised People

While CD8+ T cells specific for human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) have been extensively studied in both healthy HCMV seropositive carriers and patients undergoing immunosuppression, studies on the CD4+ T cell response to HCMV had lagged behind. However, over the last few years there has been a significant advance in our understanding of the importance and contribution that CMV-specific CD4+ T cells make, not only to anti-viral immunity but also in the potential maintenance of latently infected cells. During primary infection with HCMV in adults, CD4+ T cells are important for the resolution of symptomatic disease, while persistent shedding of HCMV into urine and saliva is associated with a lack of HCMV specific CD4+ T cell response in young children. In immunosuppressed solid organ transplant recipients, a delayed appearance of HCMV-specific CD4+ T cells is associated with prolonged viremia and more severe clinical disease, while in haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients, it has been suggested that HCMV-specific CD4+ T cells are required for HCMV-specific CD8+ T cells to exert their anti-viral effects. In addition, adoptive T-cell immunotherapy in transplant patients has shown that the presence of HCMV-specific CD4+ T cells is required for the maintenance of HCMV-specific CD8+ T cells. HCMV is a paradigm for immune evasion. The presence of viral genes that down-regulate MHC class II molecules and the expression of viral IL-10 both limit antigen presentation to CD4+ T cells, underlining the important role that this T cell subset has in antiviral immunity. This review will discuss the antigen specificity, effector function, phenotype and direct anti-viral properties of HCMV specific CD4+ T cells, as well as reviewing our understanding of the importance of this T cell subset in primary infection and long-term carriage in healthy individuals. In addition, their role and importance in congenital HCMV infection and during immunosuppression in both solid organ and haemopoietic stem cell transplantation is considered.

The Ability of a Cytomegalovirus ELISPOT Assay to Predict Outcome of Low-Level CMV Reactivation in Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections in hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients cause substantial morbidity and mortality. CMV cell-mediated immunity (CMV-CMI) can be determined by levels of interferon gamma (IFN-γ) production using an enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) CMV assay (T-SPOT.CMV assay). In this study, we evaluated the ability of this assay to predict the outcome of low-level CMV reactivation in HCT recipients.

METHODS

We followed 55 HCT recipients with low-level CMV reactivation up to 8 weeks from enrollment. Progression to clinically significant CMV infection (CS-CMVi) was defined as a CMV load >1000 IU/mL or > 500 IU/mL in patients receiving matched related/autologous or matched unrelated transplants, respectively, and initiation of antiviral treatment.

RESULTS

Progression to CS-CMVi occurred in 31 (56%) of the HCT recipients. Spot counts of CMV-specific pp65 and IE1 antigens were significantly lower in patients who had CS-CMVi than in patients who did not. On multivariate analysis, the ELISPOT CMV responses and steroids use were the only predictors of progression to CS-CMVi.

CONCLUSIONS

A strong association between low CMV-CMI and progression to CS-CMVi was observed in HCT recipients. The implementation of serial monitoring of CMV-CMI may identify patients at risk of progression to CS-CMVi that require antiviral therapy.

Mixed vs full donor engraftment early after hematopoietic cell transplant: Impact on incidence and control of cytomegalovirus infection

Recovery of cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific immunity after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is essential in controlling CMV infection. We hypothesize that mixed donor engraftment as measured by chimerism at day 30 in CMV D(+) HCTs and full chimerism in CMV D(-) HCTs will be predictive of CMV reactivation. Prospectively collected data for 407 CMV R+ HCT recipients transplanted from 2006 to 2014 at the University of Minnesota were retrospectively analyzed. Full and mixed donor engraftment were defined as ≥95% or <95% donor cells at day 30, respectively. Source of engraftment determination included preferentially peripheral blood CD3 fraction, then myeloid cell fraction (CD15+), then bone marrow. In 407 CMV R+ subjects, 77% (n = 313) were CMV D(-) cells from umbilical cord blood (n = 209), peripheral blood (n = 58) or marrow (n = 46). Fifty three per cent received reduced intensity conditioning (RIC). At day +30, full donor engraftment was seen in 82% of myeloablative and 55% of RIC transplants. The cumulative incidence of CMV infection 1-year after transplant was not different in patients with full (54%, n = 276) or mixed (53%, n = 131) donor engraftment. Control of CMV did not significantly differ among the two groups. In multiple regression analysis, there was no significant association between donor engraftment (mixed or full) and incidence or control of CMV.

Immunotherapy with Donor T Cells Sensitized with Overlapping Pentadecapeptides for Treatment of Persistent Cytomegalovirus Infection or Viremia

We conducted a phase I trial of allogeneic T cells sensitized in vitro against a pool of pentadecapeptides (15-mer peptides) spanning the sequence of CMVpp65 for adoptive therapy of 17 allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients with cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia or clinical infection persisting despite prolonged treatment with antiviral drugs. All but 3 of the patients had received T cell-depleted transplants without graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with immunosuppressive drugs after transplantation. The CMVpp65-specific T cells (CMVpp65CTLs) generated were oligoclonal and specific for only 1 to 3 epitopes, presented by a limited set of HLA class I or II alleles. T cell infusions were well tolerated without toxicity or GVHD. Of 17 patients treated with transplant donor (n = 16) or third-party (n = 1) CMVpp65CTLs, 15 cleared viremia, including 3 of 5 with overt disease. In responding patients, the CMVpp65CTLs infused consistently proliferated and could be detected by T cell receptor Vβ usage in CMVpp65/HLA tetramer + populations for period of 120 days to up to 2 years after infusion. Thus, CMVpp65CTLs generated in response to synthetic 15-mer peptides of CMVpp65 are safe and can clear persistent CMV infections in the post-transplantation period.

Clinical factors influencing phenotype of HCMV-specific CD8+ T cells and HCMV-induced interferon-gamma production after allogeneic stem cells transplantation

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection causes significant morbidity and mortality after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In this work, we characterized the phenotype and interferon-gamma (INF-γ) production of HCMV-specific T cells using QuantiFERON-HCMV assay in 26 patients 6 months after HSCT. We analysed whether these two parameters were associated with clinical variables. Our results showed that the patients receiving stem cells from donors ≥40 years old were 12 times more likely to have HCMV-specific CD8+ T cells with "differentiated phenotype" (CD45RA+CCR7+ ≤6.7% and CD28+ ≤30%) than patients grafted from donors <40 years old (OR = 12; P = 0.014). In addition, a detectable IFN-γ production in response to HCMV peptides (cutoff 0.2 IU/mL IFN-γ; "reactive" QuantiFERON-HCMV test) was statistically associated with HCMV replication after transplantation (OR = 11; P = 0.026), recipients ≥40 versus <40 years old (OR = 11; P = 0.026), and the use of peripheral blood versus bone marrow as stem cell source (OR = 17.5; P = 0.024). In conclusion, donor age is the only factor significantly associated with the presence of the "differentiated phenotype" in HCMV-specific CD8+ T cells, whereas HCMV replication after transplantation, recipient age, and stem cell source are the factors associated with the production of IFN-γ in response to HCMV epitopes.

Co-ordinated isolation of CD8(+) and CD4(+) T cells recognizing a broad repertoire of cytomegalovirus pp65 and IE1 epitopes for highly specific adoptive immunotherapy

BACKGROUND AIMS

Adoptive transfer of cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific memory T cells can be used for treatment of CMV reactivation after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. As co-ordinated CD8(+) and CD4(+) T cells specific for a broad repertoire of CMV epitopes may be most effective for adoptive immunotherapy, the aim of this study was to isolate these cells from peripheral blood of CMV seropositive donors, irrespective of their HLA type.

METHODS

Activation of CMV-specific CD8(+) and CD4(+) T cells was compared after stimulation of donor peripheral blood with minimal epitope peptides, pools of overlapping 15-mer peptides or full-length protein. Furthermore, the kinetics of interferon (IFN)-γ production after stimulation was analyzed to determine the optimal time-point for IFN-γ-based isolation of CMV-specific T cells. The specificity, phenotype and functionality of generated T-cell lines were analyzed.

RESULTS

CMV protein-spanning 15-mer peptide pools induced simultaneous activation of both CD8(+) and CD4(+) CMV-specific T cells, while full-length CMV protein only efficiently activated CD4(+) CMV-specific T cells. Isolation of IFN-γ-secreting cells at the peak of the IFN-γ response after 4-h stimulation with CMV pp65 and IE1 peptide pools resulted in efficient enrichment of CMV-specific T cells. The T-cell lines contained high frequencies of CD8(+) and CD4(+) T cells recognizing multiple CMV pp65 and IE1 epitopes, and produced IFN-γ and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α upon specific restimulation.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides a feasible strategy for the rapid generation of clinical-grade CD8(+) and CD4(+) T-cell lines with high specificity for multiple CMV pp65 and IE1 epitopes, which may be used for effective adoptive immunotherapy.

Stem Cell Transplantation for Lymphoma Patients with HIV Infection

The advent of Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (HAART) has radically changed incidence characteristics and prognosis of HIV-positive patients affected by lymphomas. At this time there is consensus in the literature that, in first line, HIV-positive patients should always be treated with curative intent preferentially following the same approach used in the HIV-negative counterpart. On the contrary, an approach of salvage therapy in HIV-positive lymphomas is still a matter of debate given that for a wide range of relapsed or resistant HIV-negative Hodgkin's disease (HD) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients, autologous peripheral or allogeneic stem cell transplantation are among the established options. In the pre-HAART era, therapeutic options derived from pioneering experiences gave only anecdotal success, either when transplantation was used to cure lymphomas or to improve HIV infection itself. Concerns relating to the entity, quality, and kinetics of early and late immune reconstitutions and the possible worsening of underlying viroimmunological conditions were additional obstacles. Currently, around 100 relapsed or resistant HIV-positive lymphomas have been treated with an autologous peripheral stem cell transplantation (APSCT) in the HAART era. Published data compared favorably with any previous salvage attempt showing a percentage of complete remission ranging from 48% to 90%, and overall survival ranging from 36% to 85% at median follow-up approaching 3 years. However, experiences are still limited and have given somewhat confounding indications, especially concerning timing and patients' selection for APSCT and feasibility and outcome for allogeneic stem cell transplant. Moreover, little data exist on the kinetics of immunological reconstitution after APSCT or relevant to the outcome of HIV infection. The aim of this review is to discuss current knowledge of the role of allogeneic and autologous stem cell transplantation as a modality in the cure of HIV and hemopoietic cancer patients. Several topics dealing with practical aspects concerning the management of APSCT in HIV-positive patients, including patient selection, timing of transplant, conditioning regimen, and relapse or nonrelapse mortality, are discussed. Data relating to the effects of mobilization and transplantation on virological parameters and pre- and posttransplant immune reconstitution are reviewed. Finally, in this review, we examine several ethical and legal issues relative to banking infected or potentially infected peripheral blood stem cells and we describe our experience and strategies to protect positive and negative donors/recipients and the health of caretakers.

Kinetics of cytomegalovirus (CMV) pp65 and IE-1-specific IFNgamma CD8+ and CD4+ T cells during episodes of viral DNAemia in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients: potential implications for the management of active CMV infection

The dynamics of CMV pp65 and IE-1-specific IFNgamma-producing CD8(+) (IFNgamma CD8(+)) and CD4(+) (IFNgamma CD4(+)) T cells and CMV DNAemia were assessed in 19 pre-emptively treated episodes of active CMV infection. Peripheral counts of IFNgamma CD8(+) and IFNgamma CD4(+) T cells inversely correlated with CMV DNAemia levels (P = <0.001 and P = 0.003, respectively). A threshold value of 1.3 cells/microl predicting CMV DNAemia clearance was established for IFNgamma CD8(+) T cells (PPV, 100%; NPV, 93%) and for IFNgamma CD4(+) T cells (PPV, 100%; NPV, 75%). Undetectable T-cell responses were usually observed at the time of initiation of pre-emptive therapy. Either a rapid (within 7 days) or a delayed (median 31 days) expansion of both T-cell populations concomitant with CMV DNAemia clearance was observed in 5 and 8 episodes, respectively. An inconsistent or a lack of expansion of both T-cell subsets was related to a persistent CMV DNAemia. Robust and maintained CMV-specific T-cell responses after CMV DNAemia clearance and cessation of antiviral therapy were associated with a null incidence of relapsing infections at least during the following month. Data obtained in the present study may be helpful in the design of therapeutic strategies for the management of active CMV infections in the allo-SCT recipient.

The risk of early and late CMV DNAemia associated with Campath use in stem cell transplant recipients

The risks associated with in vivo and ex vivo use of Campath-1H and -1G in a cohort of 206 stem cell transplant recipients for human CMV (HCMV) DNAemia have been quantified. DNAemia showed a biphasic incidence pattern with an inflexion at day 60. The first phase had a linear risk rate for HCMV DNAemia of 0.3% per day, whereas the second phase had a substantially lower risk rate of 0.058% per day. In multivariable analyses, risk factors for early DNAemia were HCMV serostatus, radiotherapy-based conditioning and CD34 stem cell dose, with the use of in vivo Campath-1H having the most significant risk (hazards ratio=3.68; 95% CI=2.02-6.72; P<0.001). Ex vivo use of Campath was not associated with an increased risk for HCMV DNAemia. Patients receiving either in vivo Campath-1H or -1G experienced HCMV DNAemia earlier (27 and 33 days, respectively) compared with patients receiving no Campath (time to DNAemia, 51 days; P=0.0006). Multivariable analysis of risk factors for HCMV DNAemia occurring beyond 100 days after transplant were older age, acute GVHD>grade II and a lower CD34 stem cell dose, whereas Campath-1H use was not associated with late HCMV DNAemia.

Detailed analysis of IFNg response upon activation permits efficient isolation of cytomegalovirus-specific CD8+ T cells for adoptive immunotherapy

Adoptive transfer of donor-derived cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific T cells may provide long-lived protection from CMV disease after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Isolation of IFNg-secreting cells after CMV peptide stimulation can be performed by IFNg capture assay to generate highly specific T-cell lines without the need for extensive culture, which may hamper their in vivo efficacy. To exploit the full potential of this approach, we analyzed the IFNg response of CMV-specific CD8+ T cells in detail. Kinetic studies showed that T-cell receptor down-regulation coincided with the induction of IFNg production upon activation, which rapidly declined thereafter despite the continued presence of specific peptide. By varying the strength of stimulation we observed that overstimulation can result in profound T-cell receptor down-regulation, more rapid decline of IFNg production and reduced expansion. On the basis of these findings, we defined optimal conditions for IFNg-based isolation of CMV-specific CD8+ T cells with maximal potential for clinical application. These data stress the importance of analyses of the kinetics of cytokine production for isolation of T cells specific for other infectious or malignant antigens to exploit the full potential of cytokine capture isolation of antigen-specific T cells.

Memory inflation during chronic viral infection is maintained by continuous production of short-lived, functional T cells

During persistent murine cytomegalovirus (MCMV) infection, the T cell response is maintained at extremely high intensity for the life of the host. These cells closely resemble human CMV-specific cells, which compose a major component of the peripheral T cell compartment in most people. Despite a phenotype that suggests extensive antigen-driven differentiation, MCMV-specific T cells remain functional and respond vigorously to viral challenge. We hypothesized that a low rate of antigen-driven proliferation would account for the maintenance of this population. Instead, we found that most of these cells divided only sporadically in chronically infected hosts and had a short half-life in circulation. The overall population was supported, at least in part, by memory T cells primed early in infection, as well as by recruitment of naive T cells at late times. Thus, these data show that memory inflation is maintained by a continuous replacement of short-lived, functional cells during chronic MCMV infection.

Levels of CMV specific CD4 T cells are dynamic and correlate with CMV viremia after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is the most frequent viral complication in patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. As CMV replication is tightly controlled by the cellular arm of specific immunity, the kinetics of CMV-specific T cells in association with individual reactivation episodes were prospectively analyzed in 40 allogeneic transplant recipients in a routine clinical setting and evaluated as determinant of impaired CMV control. Antigen-specific CD4 and CD8 T cells were quantified directly from whole blood using intracellular cytokine staining after specific stimulation and MHC class I multimers, respectively. Highly dynamic intraindividual changes of CMV-specific CD4 T cells were observed in patients experiencing CMV viremia. Episodes of CMV reactivation were associated with a drop of CMV-specific CD4 T cells that re-increased after viral clearance (p<0.0001). Furthermore, levels of CMV-specific CD4 T cells at the onset of viremia inversely correlated with peak viral load thereafter (p = 0.02). In contrast, CMV-peptide specific CD8 T cells did not show any association with viremia (p = 0.82). Interestingly, therapeutic dosages of cyclosporine A and corticosteroids led to a dose-dependent reduction of CMV-specific T-cell functions, indicating a causal link between intensified immunosuppressive treatment and CMV reactivation. In conclusion, levels of CMV-specific CD4 T cells inversely correlate with reactivation episodes and may represent a valuable measure to individually guide antiviral therapy after stem cell transplantation.

Comparison of polymerase chain reaction of polymorphonuclear leukocytes and plasma identifies patients who control cytomegalovirus infection after hematopoietic cell transplantation

By use of an automated polymerase chain reaction test of plasma and a qualitative polymerase chain reaction assay on polymorphonuclear leukocytes, we identified a subgroup of hematopoietic cell transplant recipients who were able to control cytomegalovirus infection early after hematopoietic cell transplantation without antiviral therapy. Thirty-one percent of patients had cytomegalovirus DNA detected by qualitative polymerase chain reaction assay but had no cytomegalovirus DNA detected by the automated test; this group maintained a lower peak cytomegalovirus load, compared with the group of patients who had cytomegalovirus DNA detected by both tests (P = .03), suggesting a greater degree of functional immune reconstitution.

Functional analysis of cytomegalovirus-specific T lymphocytes compared to tetramer assay in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

In order to evaluate whether we could predict reactivation of CMV by monitoring the number of CMV-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTL), tetramer analysis was performed in 37 patients who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The results disclosed that the mean number of CMV-specific CTL at day 30 did not differ among patients who developed CMV antigenemia (22/microl) and those who did not (12/microl). Serial tetramer analysis showed that 21% of the patients had >10/microl CMV-specific CTL at the first detection of CMV antigenemia and 67% of the patients had more than 10/microl CMV-specific CTL at the onset of CMV disease. Intracellular staining upon stimulation by CMV lysates and peptide in patients with CMV colitis revealed that both IFN-gamma producing CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes were suppressed at the onset of CMV colitis (1.6 and 8/microl), which increased with recovery of the disease (19 and 47/microl). These data suggest that it is difficult to predict CMV reactivation solely by the number of CMV-specific CTL. We suggest that additional functional analysis by intracellular cytokine assay may be useful for immunomonitoring against CMV.

Evaluation of intervention strategy based on CMV-specific immune responses after allogeneic SCT

Late occurring CMV disease is an important problem after allogeneic SCT and has been associated with poor CMV-specific immunity. We conducted a prospective study of 58 patients studied at 3-6 months after allo-SCT, to base the antiviral therapy on monitoring of CMV-specific immunity. Reactivation of CMV was measured by quantitative PCR, and intracellular IFN-gamma production was analysed by FACS and enzyme-linked immunospot. Antiviral therapy was deferred in patients with documented CMV-specific immunity without symptoms of CMV disease or severe GVHD. Nineteen episodes of CMV reactivation were assessable. The strategy was correctly applied in 16/19 episodes. Therapy was deferred in 5/19 (none of these patients developed CMV disease) and was given according to the strategy in 11/19 episodes. Two patients received antiviral therapy despite having T cell-specific immunity. There was a tendency that patients with late CMV reactivation had weak CD8 T cell immunity at 3 months (P=0.06). The donors' serostatus influenced the strength of both CD4 and CD8 immunity at 3 months after SCT (P<0.01). There was no effect as regards the type of conditioning, donor type, stem cell source or acute GVHD. Monitoring the immunity of SCT patients may allow more targeted use of antiviral therapy.

[Infections in stem cell transplantation]

The morbidity and mortality associated with infections in stem cell transplantation (SCT) has decreased considerably in recent years because of increasing knowledge of related risk factors, immune recovery, and the pattern of infection according to the phase of evolution of SCT, and the introduction of new and more effective antimicrobial agents. These advances, together with the use of peripheral blood stem cells, T-lymphoid cell depletion, stimulating factors, and more potent immunosuppressors has reduced SCT mortality and broadened the indications for this treatment. Nevertheless, infection continues to a prominent complication in these patients.

Ex vivo expansion and prophylactic infusion of CMV-pp65 peptide-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocytes following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Cytomegalovirus reactivation and infection post-allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant continue to cause morbidity and mortality. Current pharmacologic therapies are limited by side effects. Adoptive transfer of ex vivo generated cytomegalovirus-specific T cells has the potential to restore immunity, prevent cytomegalovirus, and circumvent the need for pharmacologic therapies. We have generated donor-derived cytomegalovirus-specific cytotoxic T cells using dendritic cells pulsed with the HLA-A2 restricted nonapeptide NLVPMVATV (NLV) derived from the cytomegalovirus-pp65 protein. These cytotoxic T cells have been given prophylactically to 9 recipients aged 4 to 65 years on or after day 28 post-allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Only 2 of 9 recipients received T cell depletion in vivo or in vitro. There were no immediate adverse reactions to the infusions. During 97-798 days of follow-up, 2 recipients developed cytomegalovirus reactivation; neither developed cytomegalovirus disease or required pharmacotherapy. Three recipients developed acute graft versus host disease after infusion. Two recipients died, 1 from thrombotic thrombocytopenia purpura secondary to cyclosporine, 1 from complications of graft versus host disease. A transient increase in numbers of cytomegalovirus-specific T cells demonstrated by NLV-tetramer binding was seen in 6 recipients. Prophylactic adoptive transfer of NLV-specific T cells is safe and may be effective in preventing cytomegalovirus reactivation.