Functional cooperation between FACT and MCM helicase facilitates initiation of chromatin DNA replication

Replication-coupled inheritance of chromatin states

During the development of eukaryote, faithful inheritance of chromatin states is central to the maintenance of cell fate. DNA replication poses a significant challenge for chromatin state inheritance because every nucleosome in the genome is disrupted as the replication fork passes. It has been found that many factors including DNA polymerases, histone chaperones, as well as, RNA Pol II and histone modifying enzymes coordinate spatially and temporally to maintain the epigenome during this progress. In this review, we provide a summary of the detailed mechanisms of replication-coupled nucleosome assembly and post-replication chromatin maturation, highlight the inheritance of chromatin states and epigenome during these processes, and discuss the future directions and challenges in this field.

A replisome-associated histone H3-H4 chaperone required for epigenetic inheritance

Faithful transfer of parental histones to newly replicated daughter DNA strands is critical for inheritance of epigenetic states. Although replication proteins that facilitate parental histone transfer have been identified, how intact histone H3-H4 tetramers travel from the front to the back of the replication fork remains unknown. Here, we use AlphaFold-Multimer structural predictions combined with biochemical and genetic approaches to identify the Mrc1/CLASPIN subunit of the replisome as a histone chaperone. Mrc1 contains a conserved histone-binding domain that forms a brace around the H3-H4 tetramer mimicking nucleosomal DNA and H2A-H2B histones, is required for heterochromatin inheritance, and promotes parental histone recycling during replication. We further identify binding sites for the FACT histone chaperone in Swi1/TIMELESS and DNA polymerase α that are required for heterochromatin inheritance. We propose that Mrc1, in concert with FACT acting as a mobile co-chaperone, coordinates the distribution of parental histones to newly replicated DNA.

Eosinophil-Associated Genes are Potential Biomarkers for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Prognosis

Background: Eosinophils, a type of white blood cell originating from the bone marrow, are widely believed to play a crucial role in inflammatory processes, including allergic reactions and parasitic infections. However, the relationship between eosinophils and liver cancer is not well understood. Methods: Tumor immune infiltration scores were calculated using single-sample Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (ssGSEA). Key modules and hub genes associated with eosinophils were screened using Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA). Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses, along with LASSO regression, were used to identify prognostic genes and create a risk model. The Tumor Immune Dysfunction and Exclusion (TIDE) score was used to evaluate the immunotherapeutic significance of the eosinophil-associated gene risk score (ERS) model. Experiments such as flow cytometry, immunohistochemical analysis, real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR), and Western blotting were used to determine gene expression levels and the status of eosinophil infiltration in tumors. Results: A risk trait model including 4 eosinophil-associated genes (RAMP3, G6PD, SSRP1, PLOD2) was developed by univariate Cox analysis and Lasso screening. Pathologic grading (p < 0.001) and model risk scores (p < 0.001) were found to be independent predictors of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patient survival. Western blotting revealed higher levels of eosinophil peroxidase (EPX) in HCC tissues compared to adjacent normal tissues. Immunohistochemistry showed that eosinophils mainly infiltrated the connective tissue around HCC. The HCC samples showed low expression of RAMP3 and high expression of G6PD, SSRP1, and PLOD2, as detected by IHC and RT-qPCR analysis. The in vivo mouse experiments showed that IL-33 treatment induced the recruitment of eosinophils and reduced the number of intrahepatic tumor nodules. Conclusion: Overall, eosinophil infiltration in HCC is significantly correlated with patient survival. The risk assessment model based on eosinophil-related genes serves as a reliable clinical prognostic indicator and provides insights for precise treatment of HCC.

The MCM2-7 Complex: Roles beyond DNA Unwinding

The MCM2-7 complex is a hexameric protein complex that serves as a DNA helicase. It unwinds the DNA double helix during DNA replication, thereby providing the single-stranded replication template. In recent years, it has become clear that the MCM2-7 complex has additional functions that extend well beyond its role in DNA replication. Through physical and functional interactions with different pathways, it impacts other nuclear events and activities, including folding of the genome, histone inheritance, chromosome segregation, DNA damage sensing and repair, and gene transcription. Collectively, the diverse roles of the MCM2-7 complex suggest it plays a critical role in maintaining genome integrity by integrating the regulation of DNA replication with other pathways in the nucleus.

Transcriptional regulation of FACT involves Coordination of chromatin accessibility and CTCF binding

Histone chaperone FACT (facilitates chromatin transcription) is well known to promote chromatin recovery during transcription. However, the mechanism how FACT regulates genome-wide chromatin accessibility and transcription factor binding has not been fully elucidated. Through loss-of-function studies, we show here that FACT component Ssrp1 is required for DNA replication and DNA damage repair and is also essential for progression of cell phase transition and cell proliferation in mouse embryonic fibroblast cells. On the molecular level, absence of the Ssrp1 leads to increased chromatin accessibility, enhanced CTCF binding, and a remarkable change in dynamic range of gene expression. Our study thus unequivocally uncovers a unique mechanism by which FACT complex regulates transcription by coordinating genome-wide chromatin accessibility and CTCF binding.

FACT regulates pluripotency through proximal and distal regulation of gene expression in murine embryonic stem cells

BACKGROUND

The FACT complex is a conserved histone chaperone with critical roles in transcription and histone deposition. FACT is essential in pluripotent and cancer cells, but otherwise dispensable for most mammalian cell types. FACT deletion or inhibition can block induction of pluripotent stem cells, yet the mechanism through which FACT regulates cell fate decisions remains unclear.

RESULTS

To explore the mechanism for FACT function, we generated AID-tagged murine embryonic cell lines for FACT subunit SPT16 and paired depletion with nascent transcription and chromatin accessibility analyses. We also analyzed SPT16 occupancy using CUT&RUN and found that SPT16 localizes to both promoter and enhancer elements, with a strong overlap in binding with OCT4, SOX2, and NANOG. Over a timecourse of SPT16 depletion, nucleosomes invade new loci, including promoters, regions bound by SPT16, OCT4, SOX2, and NANOG, and TSS-distal DNaseI hypersensitive sites. Simultaneously, transcription of Pou5f1 (encoding OCT4), Sox2, Nanog, and enhancer RNAs produced from these genes' associated enhancers are downregulated.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose that FACT maintains cellular pluripotency through a precise nucleosome-based regulatory mechanism for appropriate expression of both coding and non-coding transcripts associated with pluripotency.

Transcription and FACT facilitate the restoration of replication-coupled chromatin assembly defects

Genome duplication occurs through the coordinated action of DNA replication and nucleosome assembly at replication forks. Defective nucleosome assembly causes DNA lesions by fork breakage that need to be repaired. In addition, it causes a loss of chromatin integrity. These chromatin alterations can be restored, even though the mechanisms are unknown. Here, we show that the process of chromatin restoration can deal with highly severe chromatin defects induced by the absence of the chaperones CAF1 and Rtt106 or a strong reduction in the pool of available histones, and that this process can be followed by analyzing the topoisomer distribution of the 2µ plasmid. Using this assay, we demonstrate that chromatin restoration is slow and independent of checkpoint activation, whereas it requires the action of transcription and the FACT complex. Therefore, cells are able to "repair" not only DNA lesions but also chromatin alterations associated with defective nucleosome assembly.

Chromatin regulators in DNA replication and genome stability maintenance during S-phase

The duplication of genetic information is central to life. The replication of genetic information is strictly controlled to ensure that each piece of genomic DNA is copied only once during a cell cycle. Factors that slow or stop replication forks cause replication stress. Replication stress is a major source of genome instability in cancer cells. Multiple control mechanisms facilitate the unimpeded fork progression, prevent fork collapse and coordinate fork repair. Chromatin alterations, caused by histone post-translational modifications and chromatin remodeling, have critical roles in normal replication and in avoiding replication stress and its consequences. This text reviews the chromatin regulators that ensure DNA replication and the proper response to replication stress. We also briefly touch on exploiting replication stress in therapeutic strategies. As chromatin regulators are frequently mutated in cancer, manipulating their activity could provide many possibilities for personalized treatment.

Tandem Affinity Purification and Mass-Spectrometric Analysis of FACT and Associated Proteins

Isolation of a protein/complex is important for its biochemical and structural characterization with mechanistic insights. TAP (tandem affinity purification) strategy allows rapid isolation of cellular proteins/complexes with a high level of purity. This methodology involves an immuno-affinity-based purification followed by a conformation-based isolation to obtain a highly homogeneous protein/complex. Here, we describe the TAP-mediated isolation of endogenous FACT (facilitates chromatin transcription; a heterodimer), an essential histone chaperone associated with BER (base excision repair). However, it is not clearly understood how FACT regulates BER. Such knowledge would advance our understanding of BER with implications in disease pathogenesis, since BER is an evolutionarily conserved process that is linked to various diseases including ageing, neurodegenerative disorders, and cancers. Using isolated FACT by TAP methodology, one can study the mechanisms of action of FACT in BER. Further, isolated FACT can be used for studies in other DNA transactions such as transcription and replication, as FACT is involved in these processes. Furthermore, TAP-mediated isolation strategy can be combined with mass spectrometry to identify the protein interaction partners of FACT.

DNA replication timing: Biochemical mechanisms and biological significance

The regulation of DNA replication is a fascinating biological problem both from a mechanistic angle-How is replication timing regulated?-and from an evolutionary one-Why is replication timing regulated? Recent work has provided significant insight into the first question. Detailed biochemical understanding of the mechanism and regulation of replication initiation has made possible robust hypotheses for how replication timing is regulated. Moreover, technical progress, including high-throughput, single-molecule mapping of replication initiation and single-cell assays of replication timing, has allowed for direct testing of these hypotheses in mammalian cells. This work has consolidated the conclusion that differential replication timing is a consequence of the varying probability of replication origin initiation. The second question is more difficult to directly address experimentally. Nonetheless, plausible hypotheses can be made and one-that replication timing contributes to the regulation of chromatin structure-has received new experimental support.

Mechanisms of chromatin-based epigenetic inheritance

Multi-cellular organisms such as humans contain hundreds of cell types that share the same genetic information (DNA sequences), and yet have different cellular traits and functions. While how genetic information is passed through generations has been extensively characterized, it remains largely obscure how epigenetic information encoded by chromatin regulates the passage of certain traits, gene expression states and cell identity during mitotic cell divisions, and even through meiosis. In this review, we will summarize the recent advances on molecular mechanisms of epigenetic inheritance, discuss the potential impacts of epigenetic inheritance during normal development and in some disease conditions, and outline future research directions for this challenging, but exciting field.

The histone chaperone FACT: a guardian of chromatin structure integrity

The identification of FACT as a histone chaperone enabling transcription through chromatin in vitro has strongly shaped how its roles are envisioned. However, FACT has been implicated in essentially all aspects of chromatin biology, from transcription to DNA replication, DNA repair, and chromosome segregation. In this review, we focus on recent literature describing the role and mechanisms of FACT during transcription. We highlight the prime importance of FACT in preserving chromatin integrity during transcription and challenge its role as an elongation factor. We also review evidence for FACT's role as a cell-type/gene-specificregulator of gene expression and briefly summarize current efforts at using FACT inhibition as an anti-cancerstrategy.

The Current Status of SSRP1 in Cancer: Tribulation and Road Ahead

Methods

We search PubMed and Web of Sciences with keywords “SSRP1” and “Cancer.” Only English literature was included, and conference papers and abstract were all excluded.

Results

Transcription factors are classified into three groups based on their DNA binding motifs: simple helix-loop-helix (bHLH), classical zinc fingers (ZF-TFs), and homeodomains. The tumor-suppressive miR-497 (microRNA-497) acted as an undesirable regulator of SSRP1 upregulation, which led to tumor growth. The siRNA (small interfering RNA) knockdown of SSRP1 hindered cell proliferation along with incursion and glioma cell migration. Through the AKT (also known as protein kinase B) signaling pathway, SSRP1 silencing affected cancer apoptosis and cell proliferation.

Conclusion

The MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) signaling pathway's phosphorylation was suppressed when SSRP1 was depleted. The effect of curaxins on p53 and NF-B (nuclear factor-κB), and their toxicity to cancer cells, is attributable to the FACT (facilitates chromatin transcription) complex's chromatin trapping.

FACT maintains nucleosomes during transcription and stem cell viability in adult mice

Preservation of nucleosomes during replication has been extensively studied, while the maintenance of nucleosomes during transcription has gotten less attention. The histone chaperone FACT has a role in transcription elongation, although whether it disassembles or assembles nucleosomes during this process is unclear. To elucidate the function of FACT in mammals, we deleted the Ssrp1 subunit of FACT in adult mice. FACT loss is lethal, possibly due to the loss of the earliest progenitors in bone marrow and intestine, while more differentiated cells are not affected. Using cells isolated from several tissues, we show that FACT loss reduces the viability of stem cells but not of cells differentiated in vitro. FACT depletion increases chromatin accessibility in a transcription-dependent manner in adipose mesenchymal stem cells, indicating that nucleosomes are lost in these cells during transcription in the absence of FACT. We also observe activation of interferon (IFN) signaling and the accumulation of immunocytes in organs sensitive to FACT loss. Our data indicate that FACT maintains chromatin integrity during transcription in mammalian adult stem cells, suggesting that chromatin transcription in stem cells and differentiated cells is different.

Multiple roles of Pol epsilon in eukaryotic chromosome replication

Pol epsilon is a tetrameric assembly that plays distinct roles during eukaryotic chromosome replication. It catalyses leading strand DNA synthesis; yet this function is dispensable for viability. Its non-catalytic domains instead play an essential role in the assembly of the active replicative helicase and origin activation, while non-essential histone-fold subunits serve a critical function in parental histone redeposition onto newly synthesised DNA. Furthermore, Pol epsilon plays a structural role in linking the RFC–Ctf18 clamp loader to the replisome, supporting processive DNA synthesis, DNA damage response signalling as well as sister chromatid cohesion. In this minireview, we discuss recent biochemical and structural work that begins to explain various aspects of eukaryotic chromosome replication, with a focus on the multiple roles of Pol epsilon in this process.

The fork protection complex recruits FACT to reorganize nucleosomes during replication

Chromosome replication depends on efficient removal of nucleosomes by accessory factors to ensure rapid access to genomic information. Here, we show this process requires recruitment of the nucleosome reorganization activity of the histone chaperone FACT. Using single-molecule FRET, we demonstrate that reorganization of nucleosomal DNA by FACT requires coordinated engagement by the middle and C-terminal domains of Spt16 and Pob3 but does not require the N-terminus of Spt16. Using structure-guided pulldowns, we demonstrate instead that the N-terminal region is critical for recruitment by the fork protection complex subunit Tof1. Using in vitro chromatin replication assays, we confirm the importance of these interactions for robust replication. Our findings support a mechanism in which nucleosomes are removed through the coordinated engagement of multiple FACT domains positioned at the replication fork by the fork protection complex.

Interaction of replication factor Sld3 and histone acetyl transferase Esa1 alleviates gene silencing and promotes the activation of late and dormant replication origins

DNA replication in eukaryotes is a multi-step process that consists of three main reactions: helicase loading (licensing), helicase activation (firing), and nascent DNA synthesis (elongation). Although the contributions of some chromatin regulatory factors in the licensing and elongation reaction have been determined, their functions in the firing reaction remain elusive. In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Sld3, Sld7, and Cdc45 (3-7-45) are rate-limiting in the firing reaction and simultaneous overexpression of 3-7-45 causes untimely activation of late and dormant replication origins. Here, we found that 3-7-45 overexpression not only activated dormant origins in the silenced locus, HMLα, but also exerted an anti-silencing effect at this locus. For these, interaction between Sld3 and Esa1, a conserved histone acetyltransferase, was responsible. Moreover, the Sld3-Esa1 interaction was required for the untimely activation of late origins. These results reveal the Sld3-Esa1 interaction as a novel level of regulation in the firing reaction.

FACT interacts with Set3 HDAC and fine-tunes GAL1 transcription in response to environmental stimulation

The histone chaperone facilitates chromatin transactions (FACT) functions in various DNA transactions. How FACT performs these multiple functions remains largely unknown. Here, we found, for the first time, that the N-terminal domain of its Spt16 subunit interacts with the Set3 histone deacetylase complex (Set3C) and that FACT and Set3C function in the same pathway to regulate gene expression in some settings. We observed that Spt16-G132D mutant proteins show defects in binding to Set3C but not other reported FACT interactors. At the permissive temperature, induction of the GAL1 and GAL10 genes is reduced in both spt16-G132D and set3Δ cells, whereas transient upregulation of GAL10 noncoding RNA (ncRNA), which is transcribed from the 3′ end of the GAL10 gene, is elevated. Mutations that inhibit GAL10 ncRNA transcription reverse the GAL1 and GAL10 induction defects in spt16-G132D and set3Δ mutant cells. Mechanistically, set3Δ and FACT (spt16-G132D) mutants show reduced histone acetylation and increased nucleosome occupancy at the GAL1 promoter under inducing conditions and inhibition of GAL10 ncRNA transcription also partially reverses these chromatin changes. These results indicate that FACT interacts with Set3C, which in turn prevents uncontrolled GAL10 ncRNA expression and fine-tunes the expression of GAL genes upon a change in carbon source.

A structural framework for DNA replication and transcription through chromatin

In eukaryotic cells, DNA replication and transcription machineries uncoil nucleosomes along the double helix, to achieve the exposure of the single-stranded DNA template for nucleic acid synthesis. The replisome and RNA polymerases then redeposit histones onto DNA behind the advancing molecular motor, in a process that is crucial for epigenetic inheritance and homeostasis, respectively. Here, we compare and contrast the mechanisms by which these molecular machines advance through nucleosome arrays and discuss how chromatin remodellers can facilitate DNA replication and transcription.

Chromatin dynamics and DNA replication roadblocks

A broad spectrum of spontaneous and genotoxin-induced DNA lesions impede replication fork progression. The DNA damage response that acts to promote completion of DNA replication is associated with dynamic changes in chromatin structure that include two distinct processes which operate genome-wide during S-phase. The first, often referred to as histone recycling or parental histone segregation, is characterized by the transfer of parental histones located ahead of replication forks onto nascent DNA. The second, known as de novo chromatin assembly, consists of the deposition of new histone molecules onto nascent DNA. Because these two processes occur at all replication forks, their potential to influence a multitude of DNA repair and DNA damage tolerance mechanisms is considerable. The purpose of this review is to provide a description of parental histone segregation and de novo chromatin assembly, and to illustrate how these processes influence cellular responses to DNA replication roadblocks.

Inhibition of the FACT Complex Targets Aberrant Hedgehog Signaling and Overcomes Resistance to Smoothened Antagonists

Hedgehog signaling is aberrantly activated in hematologic malignancies and solid tumors, and targeting it is a promising therapeutic strategy against these cancers. Resistance to clinically available hedgehog-targeted Smoothened inhibitor (SMOi) drugs has become a critical issue in hedgehog-driven cancer treatment. Our previous studies identified inhibition of BET and CDK7 as two epigenetic/transcriptional-targeted therapeutic strategies for overcoming SMOi resistance, providing a promising direction for anti-hedgehog drug development. To uncover additional strategies for inhibiting aberrant hedgehog activity, here we performed CRISPR-Cas9 screening with an single-guide RNA library targeting epigenetic and transcriptional modulators in hedgehog-driven medulloblastoma cells, combined with tumor dataset analyses. Structure specific recognition protein 1 (SSRP1), a subunit of facilitates chromatin transcription (FACT) complex, was identified as a hedgehog-induced essential oncogene and therapeutic target in hedgehog-driven cancer. The FACT inhibitor CBL0137, which has entered clinical trials for cancer, effectively suppressed in vitro and in vivo growth of multiple SMOi-responsive and SMOi-resistant hedgehog-driven cancer models. Mechanistically, CBL0137 exerted anti-hedgehog activity by targeting transcription of GLI1 and GLI2, which are core transcription factors of the hedgehog pathway. SSRP1 bound the promoter regions of GLI1 and GLI2, while CBL0137 treatment substantially disrupted these interactions. Moreover, CBL0137 synergized with BET or CDK7 inhibitors to antagonize aberrant hedgehog pathway and growth of hedgehog-driven cancer models. Taken together, these results identify FACT inhibition as a promising epigenetic/transcriptional-targeted therapeutic strategy for treating hedgehog-driven cancers and overcoming SMOi resistance. SIGNIFICANCE: This study identifies FACT inhibition as an anti-hedgehog therapeutic strategy for overcoming resistance to Smoothened inhibitors and provides preclinical support for initiating clinical trials of FACT-targeted drug CBL0137 against hedgehog-driven cancers.

Insights into the roles of histone chaperones in nucleosome assembly and disassembly in virus infection

Nucleosomes are assembled or disassembled with the aid of histone chaperones in a cell. Viruses can exist either as minichromosomes/episomes or can integrate into the host genome and in both the cases the viral proteins interact and manipulate the cellular nucleosome assembly machinery to ensure their survival and propagation. Recent studies have provided insight into the mechanism and role of histone chaperones in nucleosome assembly and disassembly on the virus genome. Further, the interactions between viral proteins and histone chaperones have been implicated in the integration of the virus genome into the host genome. This review highlights the recent progress and future challenges in understanding the role of histone chaperones in viruses with DNA or RNA genome and their role in governing viral pathogenesis.

Regulation of chromatin structure and function: insights into the histone chaperone FACT

In eukaryotic cells, changes in chromatin accessibility are necessary for chromatin to maintain its highly dynamic nature at different times during the cell cycle. Histone chaperones interact with histones and regulate chromatin dynamics. Facilitates chromatin transcription (FACT) is an important histone chaperone that plays crucial roles during various cellular processes. Here, we analyze the structural characteristics of FACT, discuss how FACT regulates nucleosome/chromatin reorganization and summarize possible functions of FACT in transcription, replication, and DNA repair. The possible involvement of FACT in cell fate determination is also discussed.Abbreviations: FACT: facilitates chromatin transcription, Spt16: suppressor of Ty16, SSRP1: structure-specific recognition protein-1, NTD: N-terminal domain, DD: dimerization domain, MD: middle domain, CTD: C-terminus domain, IDD: internal intrinsically disordered domain, HMG: high mobility group, CID: C-terminal intrinsically disordered domain, Nhp6: non-histone chromosomal protein 6, RNAPII: RNA polymerase II, CK2: casein kinase 2, AID: acidic inner disorder, PIC: pre-initiation complex, IR: ionizing radiation, DDSB: DNA double-strand break, PARlation: poly ADP-ribosylation, BER: base-excision repair, UVSSA: UV-stimulated scaffold protein A, HR: homologous recombination, CAF-1: chromatin assembly factor 1, Asf1: anti-silencing factor 1, Rtt106: regulator of Ty1 transposition protein 106, H3K56ac: H3K56 acetylation, KD: knock down, SETD2: SET domain containing 2, H3K36me3: trimethylation of lysine36 in histone H3, H2Bub: H2B ubiquitination, iPSCs: induced pluripotent stem cells, ESC: embryonic stem cell, H3K4me3: trimethylation of lysine 4 on histone H3 protein subunit, CHD1: chromodomain protein.

The role of FACT in managing chromatin: disruption, assembly, or repair?

FACT (FAcilitates Chromatin Transcription) has long been considered to be a transcription elongation factor whose ability to destabilize nucleosomes promotes RNAPII progression on chromatin templates. However, this is just one function of this histone chaperone, as FACT also functions in DNA replication. While broadly conserved among eukaryotes and essential for viability in many organisms, dependence on FACT varies widely, with some differentiated cells proliferating normally in its absence. It is therefore unclear what the core functions of FACT are, whether they differ in different circumstances, and what makes FACT essential in some situations but not others. Here, we review recent advances and propose a unifying model for FACT activity. By analogy to DNA repair, we propose that the ability of FACT to both destabilize and assemble nucleosomes allows it to monitor and restore nucleosome integrity as part of a system of chromatin repair, in which disruptions in the packaging of DNA are sensed and returned to their normal state. The requirement for FACT then depends on the level of chromatin disruption occurring in the cell, and the cell's ability to tolerate packaging defects. The role of FACT in transcription would then be just one facet of a broader system for maintaining chromatin integrity.

Epigenetic regulation of replication origin assembly: A role for histone H1 and chromatin remodeling factors

During early embryonic development in several metazoans, accurate DNA replication is ensured by high number of replication origins. This guarantees rapid genome duplication coordinated with fast cell divisions. In Xenopus laevis embryos this program switches to one with a lower number of origins at a developmental stage known as mid-blastula transition (MBT) when cell cycle length increases and gene transcription starts. Consistent with this regulation, somatic nuclei replicate poorly when transferred to eggs, suggesting the existence of an epigenetic memory suppressing replication assembly origins at all available sites. Recently, it was shown that histone H1 imposes a non-permissive chromatin configuration preventing replication origin assembly on somatic nuclei. This somatic state can be erased by SSRP1, a subunit of the FACT complex. Here, we further develop the hypothesis that this novel form of epigenetic memory might impact on different areas of vertebrate biology going from nuclear reprogramming to cancer development.

Molecular mechanisms of eukaryotic origin initiation, replication fork progression, and chromatin maintenance

Eukaryotic DNA replication is a highly dynamic and tightly regulated process. Replication involves several dozens of replication proteins, including the initiators ORC and Cdc6, replicative CMG helicase, DNA polymerase α-primase, leading-strand DNA polymerase ε, and lagging-strand DNA polymerase δ. These proteins work together in a spatially and temporally controlled manner to synthesize new DNA from the parental DNA templates. During DNA replication, epigenetic information imprinted on DNA and histone proteins is also copied to the daughter DNA to maintain the chromatin status. DNA methyltransferase 1 is primarily responsible for copying the parental DNA methylation pattern into the nascent DNA. Epigenetic information encoded in histones is transferred via a more complex and less well-understood process termed replication-couple nucleosome assembly. Here, we summarize the most recent structural and biochemical insights into DNA replication initiation, replication fork elongation, chromatin assembly and maintenance, and related regulatory mechanisms.

Histone chaperone FACT is essential to overcome replication stress in mammalian cells

The histone chaperone FACT is upregulated during mammary tumorigenesis and necessary for the viability and growth of breast tumor cells. We established that only proliferating tumor cells are sensitive to FACT knockdown, suggesting that FACT functions during DNA replication in tumor cells but not in normal cells. We hypothesized that the basal level of replication stress defines the FACT dependence of cells. Using genetic and chemical tools, we demonstrated that FACT is needed to overcome replication stress. In the absence of FACT during replication stress, the MCM2-7 helicase dissociates from chromatin, resulting in the absence of ssDNA accumulation, RPA binding, and activation of the ATR/CHK1 checkpoint response. Without this response, stalled replication forks are not stabilized, and new origin firing cannot be prevented, leading to the accumulation of DNA damage and cell death. Thus, we propose a novel role for FACT as a factor preventing helicase dissociation from chromatin during replication stress.

The replisome guides nucleosome assembly during DNA replication

Nucleosome assembly during DNA replication is tightly coupled to ongoing DNA synthesis. This process, termed DNA replication-coupled (RC) nucleosome assembly, is essential for chromatin replication and has a great impact on both genome stability maintenance and epigenetic inheritance. This review discusses a set of recent findings regarding the role of replisome components contributing to RC nucleosome assembly. Starting with a brief introduction to the factors involved in nucleosome assembly and some aspects of the architecture of the eukaryotic replisome, we discuss studies from yeast to mammalian cells and the interactions of replisome components with histones and histone chaperones. We describe the proposed functions of replisome components during RC nucleosome assembly and discuss their impacts on histone segregation and implications for epigenetic inheritance.

Histone Chaperone FACT and Curaxins: Effects on Genome Structure and Function

The histone chaperone FACT plays important roles in essentially every chromatin-associated process and is an important indirect target of the curaxin class of anti-cancer drugs. Curaxins are aromatiс compounds that intercalate into DNA and can trap FACT in bulk chromatin, thus interfering with its distribution and its functions in cancer cells. Recent studies have provided mechanistic insight into how FACT and curaxins cooperate to promote unfolding of nucleosomes and chromatin fibers, resulting in genome-wide disruption of contact chromatin domain boundaries, perturbation of higher order chromatin organization, and global disregulation of gene expression. Here, we discuss the implications of these insights for cancer biology.

FACT mediates cohesin function on chromatin

Cohesin is a regulator of genome architecture with roles in sister chromatid cohesion and chromosome compaction. The recruitment and mobility of cohesin complexes on DNA is restricted by nucleosomes. Here, we show that the role of cohesin in chromosome organization requires the histone chaperone FACT ('facilitates chromatin transcription') in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We find that FACT interacts directly with cohesin, and is dynamically required for its localization on chromatin. Depletion of FACT in metaphase cells prevents cohesin accumulation at pericentric regions and causes reduced binding on chromosome arms. Using the Hi-C technique, we show that cohesin-dependent TAD (topological associated domain)-like structures in G1 and metaphase chromosomes are reduced in the absence of FACT. Sister chromatid cohesion is intact in FACT-depleted cells, although chromosome segregation failure is observed. Our data show that FACT contributes to the formation of cohesin-dependent TADs, thus uncovering a new role for this complex in nuclear organization during interphase and mitotic chromosome folding.

5-Formylcytosine mediated DNA-protein cross-links block DNA replication and induce mutations in human cells

5-Formylcytosine (5fC) is an epigenetic DNA modification introduced via TET protein-mediated oxidation of 5-methyl-dC. We recently reported that 5fC form reversible DNA–protein conjugates (DPCs) with histone proteins in living cells (Ji et al. (2017) Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 56:14130–14134). We now examined the effects of 5fC mediated DPCs on DNA replication. Synthetic DNA duplexes containing site-specific DPCs between 5fC and lysine-containing proteins and peptides were subjected to primer extension experiments in the presence of human translesion synthesis DNA polymerases η and κ. We found that DPCs containing histones H2A or H4 completely inhibited DNA replication, but the replication block was removed when the proteins were subjected to proteolytic digestion. Cross-links to 11-mer or 31-mer peptides were bypassed by both polymerases in an error-prone manner, inducing targeted C→T transitions and –1 deletions. Similar types of mutations were observed when plasmids containing 5fC-peptide cross-links were replicated in human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293T cells. Molecular simulations of the 11-mer peptide-dC cross-links bound to human polymerases η and κ revealed that the peptide fits well on the DNA major groove side, and the modified dC forms a stable mismatch with incoming dATP via wobble base pairing in the polymerase active site.

Interplay between FACT subunit SPT16 and TRIM33 can remodel chromatin at macrophage distal regulatory elements

BACKGROUND

Cell type-specific use of cis-acting regulatory elements is mediated by the combinatorial activity of transcription factors involved in lineage determination and maintenance of cell identity. In macrophages, specific transcriptional programs are dictated by the transcription factor PU.1 that primes distal regulatory elements for macrophage identities and makes chromatin competent for activity of stimuli-dependent transcription factors. Although the advances in genome-wide approaches have elucidated the functions of these macrophage-specific distal regulatory elements in transcriptional responses, chromatin structures associated with PU.1 priming and the underlying mechanisms of action of these cis-acting sequences are not characterized.

RESULTS

Here, we show that, in macrophages, FACT subunit SPT16 can bind to positioned nucleosomes directly flanking PU.1-bound sites at previously uncharacterized distal regulatory elements located near genes essential for macrophage development and functions. SPT16 can interact with the transcriptional co-regulator TRIM33 and binds to half of these sites in a TRIM33-dependent manner. Using the Atp1b3 locus as a model, we show that FACT binds to two positioned nucleosomes surrounding a TRIM33/PU.1-bound site in a region, located 35 kb upstream the Atp1b3 TSS, that interact with the Atp1b3 promoter. At this - 35 kb region, TRIM33 deficiency leads to FACT release, loss of the two positioned nucleosomes, RNA Pol II recruitment and bidirectional transcription. These modifications are associated with higher levels of FACT binding at the Atp1b3 promoter, an increase of RNA Pol II recruitment and an increased expression of Atp1b3 in Trim33^-/- macrophages.

CONCLUSIONS

Thus, sequestering of SPT16/FACT by TRIM33 at PU.1-bound distal regions might represent a new regulatory mechanism for RNA Pol II recruitment and transcription output in macrophages.

SSRP1 promotes colorectal cancer progression and is negatively regulated by miR-28-5p

In this study, microarray data analysis, real-time quantitative PCR and immunohistochemistry were used to detect the expression levels of SSRP1 in colorectal cancer (CRC) tissue and in corresponding normal tissue. The association between structure-specific recognition protein 1 (SSRP1) expression and patient prognosis was examined by Kaplan-Meier analysis. SSRP1 was knocked down and overexpressed in CRC cell lines, and its effects on proliferation, cell cycling, migration, invasion, cellular energy metabolism, apoptosis, chemotherapeutic drug sensitivity and cell phenotype-related molecules were assessed. The growth of xenograft tumours in nude mice was also assessed. MiRNAs that potentially targeted SSRP1 were determined by bioinformatic analysis, Western blotting and luciferase reporter assays. We showed that SSRP1 mRNA levels were significantly increased in CRC tissue. We also confirmed that this upregulation was related to the terminal tumour stage in CRC patients, and high expression levels of SSRP1 predicted shorter disease-free survival and faster relapse. We also found that SSRP1 modulated proliferation, metastasis, cellular energy metabolism and the epithelial-mesenchymal transition in CRC. Furthermore, SSRP1 induced apoptosis and SSRP1 knockdown augmented the sensitivity of CRC cells to 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin. Moreover, we explored the molecular mechanisms accounting for the dysregulation of SSRP1 in CRC and identified microRNA-28-5p (miR-28-5p) as a direct upstream regulator of SSRP1. We concluded that SSRP1 promotes CRC progression and is negatively regulated by miR-28-5p.

Mechanism of FACT removal from transcribed genes by anticancer drugs curaxins

Human FACT (facilitates chromatin transcription) is a multifunctional protein complex that has histone chaperone activity and facilitates nucleosome survival and transcription through chromatin. Anticancer drugs curaxins induce FACT trapping on chromatin of cancer cells (c-trapping), but the mechanism of c-trapping is not fully understood. Here, we show that in cancer cells, FACT is highly enriched within the bodies of actively transcribed genes. Curaxin-dependent c-trapping results in redistribution of FACT from the transcribed chromatin regions to other genomic loci. Using a combination of biochemical and biophysical approaches, we have demonstrated that FACT is bound to and unfolds nucleosomes in the presence of curaxins. This tight binding to the nucleosome results in inhibition of FACT-dependent transcription in vitro in the presence of both curaxins and competitor chromatin, suggesting a mechanism of FACT trapping on bulk nucleosomes (n-trapping).

Identification of Elg1 interaction partners and effects on post-replication chromatin re-formation

Elg1, the major subunit of a Replication Factor C-like complex, is critical to ensure genomic stability during DNA replication, and is implicated in controlling chromatin structure. We investigated the consequences of Elg1 loss for the dynamics of chromatin re-formation following DNA replication. Measurement of Okazaki fragment length and the micrococcal nuclease sensitivity of newly replicated DNA revealed a defect in nucleosome organization in the absence of Elg1. Using a proteomic approach to identify Elg1 binding partners, we discovered that Elg1 interacts with Rtt106, a histone chaperone implicated in replication-coupled nucleosome assembly that also regulates transcription. A central role for Elg1 is the unloading of PCNA from chromatin following DNA replication, so we examined the relative importance of Rtt106 and PCNA unloading for chromatin reassembly following DNA replication. We find that the major cause of the chromatin organization defects of an ELG1 mutant is PCNA retention on DNA following replication, with Rtt106-Elg1 interaction potentially playing a contributory role.

Kaposi's Sarcoma-Associated Herpesvirus Deregulates Host Cellular Replication during Lytic Reactivation by Disrupting the MCM Complex through ORF59

Minichromosome maintenance proteins (MCMs) play an important role in DNA replication by binding to the origins as helicase and recruiting polymerases for DNA synthesis. During the S phase, MCM complex is loaded to limit DNA replication once per cell cycle. We identified MCMs as ORF59 binding partners in our protein pulldown assays, which led us to hypothesize that this interaction influences DNA replication. ORF59's interactions with MCMs were confirmed in both endogenous and overexpression systems, which showed its association with MCM3, MCM4, MCM5, and MCM6. Interestingly, MCM6 interacted with both the N- and C-terminal domains of ORF59, and its depletion in BCBL-1 and BC3 cells led to an increase in viral genome copies, viral late gene transcripts, and virion production compared to the control cells following reactivation. MCMs perform their function by loading onto the replication competent DNA, and one means of regulating chromatin loading/unloading, in addition to enzymatic activity of the MCM complex, is by posttranslational modifications, including phosphorylation of these factors. Interestingly, a hypophosphorylated form of MCM3, which is associated with reduced loading onto the chromatin, was detected during lytic reactivation and correlated with its inability to associate with histones in reactivated cells. Additionally, chromatin immunoprecipitation showed lower levels of MCM3 and MCM4 association at cellular origins of replication and decreased levels of cellular DNA synthesis in cells undergoing reactivation. Taken together, these findings suggest a mechanism in which KSHV ORF59 disrupts the assembly and functions of MCM complex to stall cellular DNA replication and promote viral replication.IMPORTANCE KSHV is the causative agent of various lethal malignancies affecting immunocompromised individuals. Both lytic and latent phases of the viral life cycle contribute to the progression of these cancers. A better understanding of how viral proteins disrupt functions of a normal healthy cell to cause oncogenesis is warranted. One crucial lytic protein produced early during lytic reactivation is the multifunctional ORF59. In this report, we elucidated an important role of ORF59 in manipulating the cellular environment conducive for viral DNA replication by deregulating the normal functions of the host MCM proteins. ORF59 binds to specific MCMs and sequesters them away from replication origins in order to sabotage cellular DNA replication. Blocking cellular DNA replication ensures that cellular resources are utilized for transcription and replication of viral DNA.

The Histone Chaperone FACT Coordinates H2A.X-Dependent Signaling and Repair of DNA Damage

Safeguarding cell function and identity following a genotoxic stress challenge entails a tight coordination of DNA damage signaling and repair with chromatin maintenance. How this coordination is achieved and with what impact on chromatin integrity remains elusive. Here, we address these questions by investigating the mechanisms governing the distribution in mammalian chromatin of the histone variant H2A.X, a central player in damage signaling. We reveal that H2A.X is deposited de novo at sites of DNA damage in a repair-coupled manner, whereas the H2A.Z variant is evicted, thus reshaping the chromatin landscape at repair sites. Our mechanistic studies further identify the histone chaperone FACT (facilitates chromatin transcription) as responsible for the deposition of newly synthesized H2A.X. Functionally, we demonstrate that FACT potentiates H2A.X-dependent signaling of DNA damage. We propose that new H2A.X deposition in chromatin reflects DNA damage experience and may help tailor DNA damage signaling to repair progression.

•

H2A.X is deposited de novo at sites of DNA damage repair, whereas H2A.Z is evicted

•

FACT promotes new H2A.X deposition coupled to repair synthesis

•

FACT stimulates H2A.X-dependent signaling of DNA damage

•

H2A.X is not only a starting point of damage signaling but also an output of repair

H3-H4 Histone Chaperone Pathways

Nucleosomes compact and organize genetic material on a structural level. However, they also alter local chromatin accessibility through changes in their position, through the incorporation of histone variants, and through a vast array of histone posttranslational modifications. The dynamic nature of chromatin requires histone chaperones to process, deposit, and evict histones in different tissues and at different times in the cell cycle. This review focuses on the molecular details of canonical and variant H3-H4 histone chaperone pathways that lead to histone deposition on DNA as they are currently understood. Emphasis is placed on the most established pathways beginning with the folding, posttranslational modification, and nuclear import of newly synthesized H3-H4 histones. Next, we review the deposition of replication-coupled H3.1-H4 in S-phase and replication-independent H3.3-H4 via alternative histone chaperone pathways. Highly specialized histone chaperones overseeing the deposition of histone variants are also briefly discussed.

Structure and function of the histone chaperone FACT - Resolving FACTual issues

FAcilitates Chromatin Transcription (FACT) has been considered essential for transcription through chromatin mostly based on cell-free experiments. However, FACT inactivation in cells does not cause a significant reduction in transcription. Moreover, not all mammalian cells require FACT for viability. Here we synthesize information from different organisms to reveal the core function(s) of FACT and propose a model that reconciles the cell-free and cell-based observations. We describe FACT structure and nucleosomal interactions, and their roles in FACT-dependent transcription, replication and repair. The variable requirements for FACT among different tumor and non-tumor cells suggest that various FACT-dependent processes have significantly different levels of relative importance in different eukaryotic cells. We propose that the stability of chromatin, which might vary among different cell types, dictates these diverse requirements for FACT to support cell viability. Since tumor cells are among the most sensitive to FACT inhibition, this vulnerability could be exploited for cancer treatment.

SUMO2 conjugation of PCNA facilitates chromatin remodeling to resolve transcription-replication conflicts

During DNA synthesis, DNA replication and transcription machinery can collide, and the replication fork may temporarily dislodge RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) to resolve the transcription-replication conflict (TRC), a major source of endogenous DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and common fragile site (CFS) instability. However, the mechanism of TRC resolution remains unclear. Here, we show that conjugation of SUMO2, but not SUMO1 or SUMO3, to the essential replication factor PCNA is induced on transcribed chromatin by the RNAPII-bound helicase RECQ5. Proteomic analysis reveals that SUMO2-PCNA enriches histone chaperones CAF1 and FACT in the replication complex via interactions with their SUMO-interacting motifs. SUMO2-PCNA enhances CAF1-dependent histone deposition, which correlates with increased histone H3.1 at CFSs and repressive histone marks in the chromatin to reduce chromatin accessibility. Hence, SUMO2-PCNA dislodges RNAPII at CFSs, and overexpressing either SUMO2-PCNA or CAF1 reduces the incidence of DSBs in TRC-prone RECQ5-deficient cells.

Replication-Coupled Nucleosome Assembly in the Passage of Epigenetic Information and Cell Identity

During S phase, replicated DNA must be assembled into nucleosomes using both newly synthesized and parental histones in a process that is tightly coupled to DNA replication. This DNA replication-coupled process is regulated by multitude of histone chaperones as well as by histone-modifying enzymes. In recent years novel insights into nucleosome assembly of new H3-H4 tetramers have been gained through studies on the classical histone chaperone CAF-1 and the identification of novel factors involved in this process. Moreover, in vitro reconstitution of chromatin replication has shed light on nucleosome assembly of parental H3-H4, a process that remains elusive. Finally, recent studies have revealed that the replication-coupled nucleosome assembly is important for the determination and maintenance of cell fate in multicellular organisms.

Replication Stress Shapes a Protective Chromatin Environment across Fragile Genomic Regions

Recent integrative epigenome analyses highlight the importance of functionally distinct chromatin states for accurate cell function. How these states are established and maintained is a matter of intense investigation. Here, we present evidence for DNA damage as an unexpected means to shape a protective chromatin environment at regions of recurrent replication stress (RS). Upon aberrant fork stalling, DNA damage signaling and concomitant H2AX phosphorylation coordinate the FACT-dependent deposition of macroH2A1.2, a histone variant that promotes DNA repair by homologous recombination (HR). MacroH2A1.2, in turn, facilitates the accumulation of the tumor suppressor and HR effector BRCA1 at replication forks to protect from RS-induced DNA damage. Consequently, replicating primary cells steadily accrue macroH2A1.2 at fragile regions, whereas macroH2A1.2 loss in these cells triggers DNA damage signaling-dependent senescence, a hallmark of RS. Altogether, our findings demonstrate that recurrent DNA damage contributes to the chromatin landscape to ensure the epigenomic integrity of dividing cells.

The architecture and function of the chromatin replication machinery

Genomic DNA in eukaryotic cells is packaged into nucleosome arrays. During replication, nucleosomes need to be dismantled ahead of the advancing replication fork and reassembled on duplicated DNA. The architecture and function of the core replisome machinery is now beginning to be elucidated, with recent insights shaping our view on DNA replication processes. Simultaneously, breakthroughs in our mechanistic understanding of epigenetic inheritance allow us to build new models of how histone chaperones integrate with the replisome to reshuffle nucleosomes. The emerging picture indicates that the core eukaryotic DNA replication machinery has evolved elements that handle nucleosomes to facilitate chromatin duplication.

Level of FACT defines the transcriptional landscape and aggressive phenotype of breast cancer cells

Although breast cancer (BrCa) may be detected at an early stage, there is a shortage of markers that predict tumor aggressiveness and a lack of targeted therapies. Histone chaperone FACT, expressed in a limited number of normal cells, is overexpressed in different types of cancer, including BrCa. Recently, we found that FACT expression in BrCa correlates with markers of aggressive BrCa, which prompted us to explore the consequences of FACT inhibition in BrCa cells with varying levels of FACT.

FACT inhibition using a small molecule or shRNA caused reduced growth and viability of all BrCa cells tested. Phenotypic changes were more severe in high- FACT cells (death or growth arrest) than in low-FACT cells (decreased proliferation). Though inhibition had no effect on the rate of general transcription, expression of individual genes was changed in a cell-specific manner. Initially distinct transcriptional profiles of BrCa cells became similar upon equalizing FACT expression. In high-FACT cells, FACT supports expression of genes involved in the regulation of cell cycle, DNA replication, maintenance of an undifferentiated cell state and regulated by the activity of several proto-oncogenes. In low-FACT cells, the presence of FACT reduces expression of genes encoding enzymes of steroid metabolism that are characteristic of differentiated mammary epithelia.

Thus, we propose that FACT is both a marker and a target of aggressive BrCa cells, whose inhibition results in the death of BrCa or convertion of them to a less aggressive subtype.

SSRP1 Cooperates with PARP and XRCC1 to Facilitate Single-Strand DNA Break Repair by Chromatin Priming

DNA single-strand breaks (SSB) are the most common form of DNA damage, requiring repair processes that to initiate must overcome chromatin barriers. The FACT complex comprised of the SSRP1 and SPT16 proteins is important for maintaining chromatin integrity, with SSRP1 acting as an histone H2A/H2B chaperone in chromatin disassembly during DNA transcription, replication, and repair. In this study, we show that SSRP1, but not SPT16, is critical for cell survival after ionizing radiation or methyl methanesulfonate-induced single-strand DNA damage. SSRP1 is recruited to SSB in a PARP-dependent manner and retained at DNA damage sites by N-terminal interactions with the DNA repair protein XRCC1. Mutational analyses showed how SSRP1 function is essential for chromatin decondensation and histone H2B exchange at sites of DNA strand breaks, which are both critical to prime chromatin for efficient SSB repair and cell survival. By establishing how SSRP1 facilitates SSB repair, our findings provide a mechanistic rationale to target SSRP1 as a general approach to selectively attack cancer cells. Cancer Res; 77(10); 2674-85. ©2017 AACR.

Regulation of Replication Fork Advance and Stability by Nucleosome Assembly

The advance of replication forks to duplicate chromosomes in dividing cells requires the disassembly of nucleosomes ahead of the fork and the rapid assembly of parental and de novo histones at the newly synthesized strands behind the fork. Replication-coupled chromatin assembly provides a unique opportunity to regulate fork advance and stability. Through post-translational histone modifications and tightly regulated physical and genetic interactions between chromatin assembly factors and replisome components, chromatin assembly: (1) controls the rate of DNA synthesis and adjusts it to histone availability; (2) provides a mechanism to protect the integrity of the advancing fork; and (3) regulates the mechanisms of DNA damage tolerance in response to replication-blocking lesions. Uncoupling DNA synthesis from nucleosome assembly has deleterious effects on genome integrity and cell cycle progression and is linked to genetic diseases, cancer, and aging.

Histone chaperone networks shaping chromatin function

The association of histones with specific chaperone complexes is important for their folding, oligomerization, post-translational modification, nuclear import, stability, assembly and genomic localization. In this way, the chaperoning of soluble histones is a key determinant of histone availability and fate, which affects all chromosomal processes, including gene expression, chromosome segregation and genome replication and repair. Here, we review the distinct structural and functional properties of the expanding network of histone chaperones. We emphasize how chaperones cooperate in the histone chaperone network and via co-chaperone complexes to match histone supply with demand, thereby promoting proper nucleosome assembly and maintaining epigenetic information by recycling modified histones evicted from chromatin.

Chromatin Replication and Histone Dynamics

Inheritance of the DNA sequence and its proper organization into chromatin is fundamental for genome stability and function. Therefore, how specific chromatin structures are restored on newly synthesized DNA and transmitted through cell division remains a central question to understand cell fate choices and self-renewal. Propagation of genetic information and chromatin-based information in cycling cells entails genome-wide disruption and restoration of chromatin, coupled with faithful replication of DNA. In this chapter, we describe how cells duplicate the genome while maintaining its proper organization into chromatin. We reveal how specialized replication-coupled mechanisms rapidly assemble newly synthesized DNA into nucleosomes, while the complete restoration of chromatin organization including histone marks is a continuous process taking place throughout the cell cycle. Because failure to reassemble nucleosomes at replication forks blocks DNA replication progression in higher eukaryotes and leads to genomic instability, we further underline the importance of the mechanistic link between DNA replication and chromatin duplication.