Sildenafil improves nocturnal penile erections in organic impotence

Nocturnal penile erections: A retrospective study of the role of RigiScan in predicting the response to sildenafil in erectile dysfunction patients

Sildenafil enhances the nitric oxide–cGMP pathway of erection, which is claimed to have a role in nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity (NPTR). This study aimed to find whether RigiScan can predict the response to sildenafil among erectile dysfunction (ED) patients and to find which RigiScan parameter produces the best prediction. Medical records of 172 ED patients were revised regarding their full sexual history, standard andrology examination, NPTR monitoring by the RigiScan device, and the degree of response to sildenafil. Of 172 ED patients, 94 patients (54.7%) were sildenafil responders. All RigiScan parameters were higher in the sildenafil responder group. The RigiScan parameters with the most differentiating power between both sildenafil responders and non-responders were base rigidity (AUC 0.860) and then tip rigidity (AUC 0.831). The cut-off value of base and tip rigidity with the highest diagnostic accuracy was 42.5%. This finding was found to be more specific than the sensitivity in predicting a positive response to sildenafil (85.9% vs. 70.2% and 92.3% vs. 59.6%, for base and tip rigidity, respectively). Sildenafil response in ED cases can be predicted through NPTR monitoring using the RigiScan device and ED patients with RigiScan base or tip rigidity less than 42% are not expected to respond well to sildenafil.

The effects of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors on penile rigidity variables during a period with no sexual stimulation: a laboratory setting double-blind study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors on erectile variables during a period with no sexual stimulation in a laboratory setting double-blind study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In all, 80 men without erectile dysfunction (ED) but with lifelong premature ejaculation (PE) were included in the study. The men were divided equally in to four groups and received either placebo, vardenafil (10 mg), sildenafil (50 mg) or tadalafil (20 mg) in a double-blind study design. The men attended the laboratory following 3 days of sexual abstinence and placebo or one of the PDE5 inhibitors was ingested after ≥ 2 h of fasting and non-smoking. The men were then immediately placed in a silent room and real-time penile rigidity and tumescence monitoring with Rigiscan Plus (Rigiscan Plus® System, Osbon Medical Systems, Augusta, GA, USA) began. The men read some magazines or newspapers that contained no sexually stimulating material for 1.5 h. There was no interaction between the men and observer during the test period. Times to first measured and total durations of base and tip rigidities, and also total and per minute rigidity were evaluated.

RESULTS

The recorded base and/or tip rigidity ratios were 40% (eight of 20), 71% (12/17), 47% (nine of 19) and 70% (14/20) in men who took placebo, sildenafil, tadalafil and vardenafil, respectively (P = 0.126). The ratio of men who could obtain ≥ 60% base and/or tip rigidities were 10% (two of 20), 41% (seven of 17), 26% (five of 19) and 55% (11/20) in placebo, sildenafil, tadalafil and vardenafil groups, respectively (P < 0.05). The median time to first measured base rigidity was 58.0, 21.5, 54.5 and 57 min with placebo, sildenafil, tadalafil and vardenafil, respectively (P = 0032). The median total duration of recorded base rigidity was 4.0, 27.5, 10.0 and 11.5 min in men who took placebo, sildenafil, tadalafil and vardenafil, respectively (P = 0.013). The median total base rigidity (area under the curve) was 72.8, 699.0, 360.5 and 553.0 with placebo, sildenafil, tadalafil and vardenafil, respectively (P = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

Significant penile rigidities were obtained with PDE5 inhibitors during the short test period, with no sexual stimulation, in laboratory conditions. This finding might support the use of PDE5 inhibitors in men who need penile rehabilitation.

Oral phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors: nonerectogenic beneficial uses

INTRODUCTION

Phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) hydrolyses cyclic guanylate monophosphate (cGMP) specifically to 5' GMP. PDE5 inhibitors were a breakthrough medication that addressed a previously unfulfilled medical need. They promoted vascular relaxation in the corpora cavernosa and penile erection during sexual stimulation. Sildenafil, vardenafil, and tadalafil were approved then introduced as effective treatments for male erectile dysfunction. This impact has stimulated academic, clinical, and industrial research.

AIM

To highlight the nonerectogenic beneficial uses of oral PDE5 inhibitors.

METHOD

A systematic review of published studies in this affair based on a Pubmed and medical subject heading databases search of all concerned articles.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Demonstrated beneficial as well as applicable uses of oral PDE5 inhibitors.

RESULTS

As chemical molecules, these drugs were shown to exert potential nonerectogenic beneficial effects. They showed efficacy as a useful adjunct in the management of pulmonary hypertension. Additional uses were extended to different utilities: essential hypertension, benign prostatic hyperplasia, gastrointestinal disorders, endothelial dysfunction, female sexual dysfunction, genital blood flow, exercise capacity, Raynaud's phenomenon, sperm motility, etc.

CONCLUSION

Exploring PDE5 inhibitors for their possible medical applications in diverse specialties seems to be beneficial in making use of these molecules for the welfare of humanity.

Long-term treatment of erectile dysfunction with a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor and dose optimization based on nocturnal penile tumescence

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that a variable dosage of the oral phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitor sildenafil (25, 50, 100 mg) or vardenafil (5, 10, 25 mg) determined according to results obtained from nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity (NPTR, RigiScan), given nightly for 1 year, can improve spontaneous erectile function (EF) in men with mild-to-moderate arteriogenic erectile dysfunction (ED); this regimen was compared with a fixed daily dosage of sildenafil 25 mg or vardenafil 5 mg.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a prospective open-label, parallel-group trial 154 men with ED were randomized either to fixed low-dose sildenafil 25 mg or vardenafil 5 mg (group 1) or to the lowest erectile dosage of sildenafil (25, 50 or 100 mg) or vardenafil (5, 10 or 20 mg) (group 2) provoking an erectile event as measured by NPTR nightly for 1 year. The EF domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) was assessed before and 1 year after the beginning of treatment, and at 4 weeks after ending treatment.

RESULTS

After 1 year, 27 of 63 (64%) evaluable men in group 1 had an EF domain score in the normal range, vs 46 of 61 (75%) men in group 2. After the subsequent 4-week wash-out phase, both groups continued to have improved EF domain scores; 22 of 63 (35%) men in group 1 still had a score in the normal range, whereas 38 of 61 (62%) in group 2 had a normal score. The EF domain score in group 1 and 2 improved significantly after 1 year of treatment, from 13.6 to 18.9, and 15.1 to 23.9, respectively (P < 0.01). After the subsequent 4-week wash-out phase, men from both groups maintained this significant level of EF, at 17.1 and 22.4, respectively (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Nightly PDE5-inhibitor treatment 1 year in a dosage determined by NPTR measurements results in better EF than giving a fixed dosage of sildenafil (25 mg) or vardenafil (5 mg). This improvement persisted for >4 weeks beyond the end of treatment. The results from this open-label, randomized trial warrant verification under double-blind, placebo-controlled conditions.

Improved spontaneous erectile function in men with mild-to-moderate arteriogenic erectile dysfunction treated with a nightly dose of sildenafil for one year: a randomized trial

AIM

To test the hypothesis that sildenafil (50 mg nightly for one year) can improve spontaneous erectile function (EF) in men with mild-to-moderate arteriogenic erectile dysfunction (ED) responsive to erectogenic treatment.

METHODS

In a prospective open-label trial, 112 men with ED were randomized to sildenafil 50 mg nightly or sildenafil 50 or 100 mg as needed for 12 months, followed by one-month and 6-month non-medicated periods. Non-randomized, non-medicated men with ED were also assessed. The EF domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF EF) and the peak systolic velocity (PSV) of penile cavernous arteries were used to measure the efficacy.

RESULTS

After sildenafil treatment and a subsequent non-medicated month, IIEF EF was normal in 29 of 48 (60.4%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 45.3-74.2%) of the nightly group vs. 4 of 49 (8.2%, 95% CI: 2.3-19.6%) of the as-needed group. PSV improved by 11.2 cm/s (95% CI: 4.7-21.4; P=0.012) in the nightly group but only by 3.4 cm/s (-5.1-14.7; P=0.435) in the as-needed group. IIEF EF normalized in 1 of 18 (5.6%, 95% CI: 0.1-27.3%) non-medicated men and the PSV declined slightly. Six months after treatment, the IIEF EF remained normal and PSV was stabilized in most (28/29, 97%) nightly group men who had initially normalized.

CONCLUSION

Sildenafil nightly for one year resulted in ED regression that persisted well beyond the end of treatment, so that spontaneous EF was characterized as normal on the IIEF in most men. The results from this open-label, randomized trial warrant verification under double-blind, placebo-controlled conditions.

Treating erectile dysfunction by endothelial rehabilitation with phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors

A large body of evidence has accumulated demonstrating that a common pathway in conditions such as hypertension, atherosclerosis, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes mellitus, and erectile dysfunction (ED) is endothelial dysfunction. Although a complete pharmacological cure for ED is currently unavailable, the phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitors sildenafil, vardenafil, and tadalafil are efficacious oral therapy for ED. Results from recent studies suggest that regular treatment with a PDE5 inhibitor may lead to enhanced erectile function (EF) beyond that observed with on-demand usage, possibly through improvement of endothelial function. Such an effect may be viewed as rehabilitation of damaged erectile tissue. The present review focuses on several recent studies which provide evidence for the beneficial effect of regular PDE5 inhibitor administration on the improvement of EF by rehabilitation of vascular endothelium.

Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors for erectile dysfunction

The cyclic nucleotide signalling pathway mediates the smooth-muscle relaxing effects of nitric oxide necessary for normal erectile function. Down-regulation of this pathway is central to the pathophysiology of many forms of erectile dysfunction (ED), which is often associated with other chronic diseases (e.g. hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus) and treatments (e.g. certain drugs, radical prostatectomy). Conversely, selective inhibition of the enzyme that catalyses the degradation of cGMP (phosphodiesterase type 5, PDE-5) promotes erectile responses to sexual stimulation. The successful launch and commercialization of the selective PDE5 inhibitor (PDE5I) sildenafil transformed the treatment of ED, not only by providing an effective, well tolerated oral ED therapy, but also by fostering greater candour about the problem among men. Sildenafil is highly effective in promoting erectile responses across a wide spectrum of severity and causes of ED, including patients with ED that is often refractory to treatment. The recent advent of vardenafil, which has the highest in vitro potency of all available PDE5Is, and tadalafil, which has a prolonged half-life that may enable couples to have sexual activity with less planning, represent further advances. Other PDE5Is offering further potential improvements are under active investigation.

Sildenafil citrate significantly improves nocturnal penile erections in sildenafil non-responding patients with psychogenic erectile dysfunction

Effects of sildenafil citrate on nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity (NPTR) were evaluated among sildenafil non-responding patients with psychogenic erectile dysfunction. All patients (n=30), equally divided into groups I and II, completed four consecutive nights using the RigiScan Plus device. Sildenafil citrate (50 mg) was given in the third night in group I and in the fourth in group II, whereas a placebo was given in the remaining nights. Additional patients (n=12) receiving only a placebo served as a control group. Results of NPTR recordings revealed neither significant differences between the control and non-sildenafil nights of both test groups, nor between the corresponding values of both groups (P>0.05). On the other hand, when sildenafil citrate nights of groups I and II taken together were compared with placebo nights, a significant increase of total events duration (P<0.001), average rigidity of the tip (P<0.05) and base (P<0.01), and rigidity activity unit (RAU) and tumescence activity unit (TAU) of tip and base (P<0.001) was observed. These results suggest that performance anxiety may be responsible for failure of response during awakening.

Investigations in erectile dysfunction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This is an update of recent developments in the investigation of erectile dysfunction in the period since March 2002.

RECENT FINDINGS

Three developments in the field of medical sexology redirected the approach towards the investigation of erectile dysfunction. First, the emergence of oral pharmacological therapy; second, the notion that sexual relationship issues have an important impact on the successful outcome of pharmacological therapy; and finally, the concept that erectile dysfunction is often a sequel or even a sentinel of cardiovascular disease. Consequently, the current evaluation of men with erectile dysfunction may be divided into two steps: a basic diagnostic evaluation for the majority of men, and specific diagnostic procedures for a small minority. The basic evaluation is aimed at the identification of the underlying pathological condition and erectile dysfunction-associated risk factors. Such screening may diagnose reversible causes of erectile dysfunction and also unmask medical and psychological conditions that manifest with erectile dysfunction. The basic evaluation consists of a comprehensive medical, sexual and psychosocial history and a physical examination. Patients who have failed first-line treatment or complicated cases qualify for specific diagnostic procedures, traditionally performed by urologists.

SUMMARY

Current research into the investigation of erectile dysfunction emphasizes the notion that erectile dysfunction is often a result of an interplay between medical and psychosexual conditions. Recognition of the underlying conditions and an estimation of their relative contribution to the patient's and his partner's sexual problem are key issues in the current evaluation of the man with erectile dysfunction.

Effect of sildenafil on nocturnal erections of potent men

We try to evaluate the effect of sildenafil on nocturnal penile erections of potent men. We recruited 22 potent men (eight medical students and 14 urology residents) 23-29 years old into the study. A disorder-free medical and sexual history and normal erectile functions were the only inclusion criteria. All subjects completed three sessions of consecutive nights using the RigiScan Plus device. After a first night of adaptation, night 2 recordings were their baseline values whereas they received sildenafil 100 mg on night 3. We observed statistically significant improvement with regard to those NPT parameters at the nights with sildenafil: number of erectile episodes; duration of tip rigidity >60%, RAU tip, RAU base and TAU tip (P<0.005). Although the duration of erectile episodes (min) and TAU base were greater during the sildenafil night, these did not reach statistical significance. In conclusion, our study showed that sildenafil can improve nocturnal erectile quality not only in patients with erectile dysfunction as previously published but also in potent males.

Modern pharmacotherapy for erectile dysfunction: evolving concepts with central and peripheral acting agents

Pharmacotherapy for men experiencing erectile dysfunction has undergone dramatic advances over the past 5 years with the introduction of an effective oral agent. Sildenafil has increased the pool of couples seeking treatment for this important health issue as well as expanding the numbers of physicians treating it. Research into the growing field of erectile dysfunction is expanding at a rapid pace. Independent investigators worldwide now regularly contribute to our body of scientific knowledge. Novel oral therapies targeted at specific points along the erectile cascade are undergoing pre-clinical and early phase registration trials with the promise of rapid action, extended duration of responsiveness and an improved side effect profile. In this review, we have highlighted recent information on the next generation of phosphodiesterase inhibitors and summarized the evolving research into centrally acting agents, which may lead to effective combination therapy.