Rat Ace allele variation determines susceptibility to AngII-induced renal damage

Acute Declines in Estimated GFR in Blood Pressure Target Trials and Risk of Adverse Outcomes

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Acute decreases in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) occur commonly during intensive blood pressure (BP) lowering. Our objective was to determine the relationship between acute decreases in estimated GFR and patient outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

Participants from 4 randomized controlled trials of intensive BP lowering in chronic kidney disease (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease study, African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension, Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial, and Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes trial).

EXPOSURE

A 4-category exposure defined by the level of acute decrease in estimated GFR (defined as>15% vs≤15% between baseline and month 4) and the randomization to intensive versus usual BP control.

OUTCOMES

Risk of kidney replacement therapy (primary outcome), defined as the need for dialysis or transplant except in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes trial, which defined its kidney outcome as a composite occurrence of serum creatinine concentration>3.3mg/dL, kidney failure, or kidney replacement therapy.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

Multivariable Cox models.

RESULTS

We included 4,473 individuals randomly assigned to intensive versus usual BP control who had a total of 351 kidney outcomes and 304 deaths during median follow-up durations of 22 and 24 months, respectively. Approximately 14% of participants exhibited an acute decrease in eGFR, 11.0% in the usual BP treatment arm and 17.8% in the intensive BP treatment arm. In adjusted models, compared with a≤15% eGFR decrease in the usual BP arm, a≤15% eGFR decrease in the intensive BP control arm was associated with lower risk of the kidney outcome (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.57-0.98). In contrast, a>15% decrease in eGFR was associated with a higher risk of the kidney outcome in the usual (HR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.80-3.38) and intensive BP treatment arms (HR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.45-2.73) compared with a≤15% decrease in the usual BP arm.

LIMITATIONS

Observational study, residual confounding.

CONCLUSIONS

Decreases in eGFR of>15% in the usual and intensive BP treatment arms were associated with a higher risk of kidney outcomes compared with a≤15% decrease in the usual BP arm and may be a harbinger of adverse outcomes.

Hypertension in Chronic Kidney Disease: Novel Insights

Management of arterial hypertension in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains a major challenge due to its high prevalence and associations with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and CKD progression. Several clinical trials and meta-analyses have demonstrated that aggressive treatment of hypertension in patients with and without CKD lowers the risk of CVD and all-cause mortality, nevertheless the effects of blood pressure (BP) lowering in terms of renal protection or harm remain controversial. Both home and ambulatory BP estimation have shown that patients with CKD display abnormal BP patterns outside of the office and further investigation is required, so as to compare the association of ambulatory versus office BP measurements with hard outcomes and adjust treatment strategies accordingly. Although renin-angiotensin system blockade appears to be beneficial in patients with advanced CKD, especially in the setting of proteinuria, discontinuation of renin-angiotensin system inhibition should be considered in the setting of frequent episodes of acute kidney injury or hypotension while awaiting the results of ongoing trials. In light of the new evidence in favor of renal denervation in arterial hypertension, the indications and benefits of its application in individuals with CKD need to be clarified by future studies. Moreover, the clinical utility of the novel players in the pathophysiology of arterial hypertension and CKD, such as microRNAs and the gut microbiota, either as markers of disease or as therapeutic targets, remains a subject of intensive research.

Use of Renin-Angiotensin System Blockade in Advanced CKD: An NKF-KDOQI Controversies Report

Multiple clinical trials have demonstrated that renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade with either angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers effectively reduces chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression. However, most clinical trials excluded participants with advanced CKD (ie, estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR]<30mL/min/1.73m²). It is acknowledged that initiation of RAS blockade is often associated with an acute reduction in eGFR, which is thought to be functional, but may result in long-term preservation of kidney function through the reductions in glomerular intracapillary pressure conferred by these agents. In this National Kidney Foundation-Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (NKF-KDOQI) report, we discuss the controversies regarding use of RAS blockade in patients with advanced kidney disease. We review available published data on this topic and provide perspective on the impact of RAS blockade on changes in eGFRs and potassium levels. We conclude that more research is needed to evaluate the therapeutic index of RAS blockade in patients with advanced CKD.

A retrospective Aliskiren and Losartan study in non-diabetic chronic kidney disease

AIM: To assess the efficacy of combined Aliskiren and Losartan vs high dose Losartan and Aliskiren alone in chronic kidney disease (CKD).

METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 143 patients with non-diabetic CKD comparing combined Aliskiren (150 mg/d) with Losartan (100 mg/d) therapy vs High dose Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) (Losartan 200 mg/d) and the third group Aliskiren (150 mg/d) alone. This study involved only patient medical records. Entry criteria included those patients who had been treated with the above drugs for at least 36 mo within the 5 years period; other criteria included proteinuria of 1 g or more and or CKD Stage 3 at the start of the 36 mo period. The study utilised primary renal end points of estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) < 15 mL/min or end stage renal failure.

RESULTS: Patients treated with high dose ARB compared to the other two treatment groups had significantly less proteinuria at the end of 36 mo (P < 0.007). All 3 groups had significant reduction of proteinuria (P < 0.043, P < 0.001). Total urinary protein was significantly different between the 3 groups over the 3-year study period (P = 0.008), but not eGFR. The changes in eGFR from baseline to each year were not significantly different between the 3 therapeutic groups (P < 0.119). There were no significant differences in the systolic and diastolic blood pressure between the 3 drug groups throughout the 3 years. The incidence of hyperkalemia (> 5.5 mmol/L) was 14.2% (7/49) in the Combined Aliskiren and ARB group, 8.7% (4/46) in the Aliskiren alone group and 6.3% (3/48) in the High dose ARB group (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION: This study in non-diabetic CKD patients showed that Combination therapy with Aliskiren and ARB was effective but was not safe as it was associated with a high prevalence of hyperkalaemia.

AT1 antagonism and renin inhibition in mice: pivotal role of targeting angiotensin II in chronic kidney disease

The role of the renin-angiotensin system in chronic kidney disease involves multiple peptides and receptors. Exerting antipodal pathophysiological mechanisms, renin inhibition and AT(1) antagonism ameliorate renal damage. However, it is unclear which mechanism exerts better nephroprotection. We compared the renin inhibitor aliskiren with the AT(1) antagonist losartan in mice with chronic kidney disease due to renal ablation. Doses were adjusted to equipotent inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system, determined via a dose-response quantifying plasma and renal renin expression. Six-week treatment with either 500 mg/l drinking water losartan or 50 mg·kg(-1)·day(-1) aliskiren significantly decreased albuminuria, glomerular damage, and transcription rates of renal injury markers to a similar extent. An array analysis comparing renal gene expression of losartan- and aliskiren-treated mice evaluating >34,000 transcripts demonstrated regulation for 14 genes only, with small differences. No superior nephroprotection was found by combining losartan and aliskiren. Compared with plasma concentrations, aliskiren accumulated ∼7- to 29-fold in the heart, liver, lung, and spleen and ∼156-fold in the kidney. After withdrawal, plasma concentrations dropped to zero within 24 h, whereas renal tissue concentrations declined slowly over days. Withdrawal of aliskiren in mice with chronic kidney disease revealed a significantly delayed re-increase in albuminuria compared with withdrawal of losartan. This study demonstrates equieffective nephroprotection of renin inhibition and AT(1) antagonism in mice with chronic kidney disease without additional benefit of combination therapy. These observations underscore the pivotal role of targeting ANG II to reduce renal injury.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor versus Angiotensin 2 Receptor Antagonist Therapy and the Influence of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Gene Polymorphism in IgA Nephritis

Introduction: In this study of 109 patients with IgA nephritis (IgAN), we compared the long term effects on patients treated with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor antagonist (ATRA) alone with respect to renal outcome in terms of ESRF from 1995 to 2006. The renal outcome is also correlated with the ACE gene ID polymorphism to study its influence on response to ACEI/ATRA therapy. Materials and Methods: Seventy-seven patients were on treatment with ACEI/ATRA (22 on ACEI alone, 47 on ATRA alone and 8 on both). The other 32 patients were on no treatment (control group). Results: Compared to controls, treated patients had lower serum creatinine (P<0.001), lower proteinuria (P<0.001) and fewer number progressing to ESRF (P<0.001). For those with the II and ID genotype there were significantly fewer patients with ESRF in the treatment group. With the DD genotype, treatment did not change the poor renal outcome with regard to ESRF. Patients on ACEI therapy had a higher incidence of ESRF compared to those on ATRA (P<0.001). For the control group, the projected number of years-to-ESRF was 10 years. For those on ACEI therapy it was 11 years, and for those on ATRA therapy it was 24 years. Among patients with the II genotype, those treated with ATRA had significantly less incidence of ESRF compared to those treated with ACEI (P<0.001). Conclusion: ATRA therapy was found to be effective in retarding disease progression to ESRF in IgAN compared to ACEI therapy. Genotyping showed better response to ATRA therapy only for those with the II genotype. Key words: End-stage renal failure, Genotyping, Reciprocal creatinine plots

Aldosterone and progression of renal disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review is to look at the role of aldosterone in the progression of chronic kidney disease. The reduction of blood pressure and proteinuria in patients suffering from chronic kidney disease decreases the rate of disease progression. Suppression of angiotensin formation by angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and blockade of the angiotensin II receptor by angiotensin II type 1 antagonists are powerful therapeutic strategies that effectively lower blood pressure and slow the progression of renal disease. These therapies, however, provide only imperfect protection, since they cannot always prevent endstage renal failure.

RECENT FINDINGS

Aldosterone plays a significant role in the pathogenesis of arterial hypertension and renal disease. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II type 1 antagonists are incomplete in suppressing aldosterone production and 'aldosterone breakthrough' can be observed under continued treatment. Aldosterone blockade reduces blood pressure in virtually all patients with hypertension. In proteinuric patients, the addition of an aldosterone antagonist to an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor or to angiotensin II type 1 antagonists reduces proteinuria.

SUMMARY

The use of aldosterone antagonists in addition to either angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II type 1 antagonists in proteinuric patients reduces proteinuria, which may translate into preservation of the glomerular filtration rate in the longer term. Therefore, blockade of the aldosterone pathway may prove to be a beneficial therapy for chronic kidney disease.