Efficacy and toxicity of low-dose escalating donor lymphocyte infusion given after reduced intensity conditioning allograft for multiple myeloma

Multiple Myeloma, Version 3.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

Multiple myeloma is a malignant neoplasm of plasma cells that accumulate in bone marrow, leading to bone destruction and marrow failure. This manuscript discusses the management of patients with solitary plasmacytoma, smoldering multiple myeloma, and newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Allogeneic Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma-Does It Still Have a Place?

Novel drugs have improved survival for patients with multiple myeloma in recent years. However, the disease is still fatal. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (Allo) has proven to cure some patients with the disease, but its role is controversial due to relatively high transplant-related toxicity and mortality (nonrelapse mortality, NRM). Using nonmyeloablative reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC), both toxicity and NRM can be reduced, and RICAllo is, therefore, an option for subgroups of patients. Upfront tandem autologous/RICAllo (Auto/RICAllo) was shown to be superior to single Auto or tandem Auto/Auto in both progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in two prospective studies with long-term follow-up, while three similarly designed studies did not detect a difference. A recent update of pooled patient data from four of these studies showed significantly superior PFS and OS with Auto/RICAllo. Importantly, none of these studies showed inferior results with Auto/RICAllo in patients less than 70 years of age. Auto/RICAllo appears to overcome some poor risk cytogenetic markers. Encouraging results have also been seen in treatment of relapsed patients. Combining Allo with new proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs may further improve results. Other encouraging new cell therapies such as with CAR T-cells, NK- and CAR NK-cells may well have a place in combination with RICAllo. Such studies are warranted.

Long-Term Results of Prophylactic Donor Lymphocyte Infusions for Patients with Multiple Myeloma after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

The major reason for treatment failure after allografting in multiple myeloma (MM) is relapse. Donor lymphocyte infusions (DLIs) are considered a valuable post-transplant strategy mainly for relapsed patients but using them to prevent relapse in MM has been reported rarely. In the present study, we examined the efficacy of prophylactic DLIs after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in myeloma patients with a long-term follow-up of more than 5 years. A total of 61 patients with MM who did not relapse or develop disease progression after allo-HSCT were treated with prophylactic DLI in an escalating fashion (overall 132 DLI procedures) to deepen remission status and prevent relapse. Overall response rate to DLI was 77%. Thirty-three patients (54%) upgraded their remission status, 41 patients (67%) achieved or maintained complete remission, and 26% achieved a molecular remission. Incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grade II to IV was 33% and no DLI-related mortality was noted. After a median follow-up of 68.7 months from first DLI the estimated 8-year progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in a landmark analysis was 43% (95% confidence interval [CI], 28% to 57%) and 67% (95% CI, 53% to 82%), respectively, with best outcome for patients who acquired molecular remission (8-year PFS was 62% and 8-year OS was 83%). Prophylactic escalating DLI in a selected cohort of MM patients to prevent relapse after allograft resulted in a low incidence of severe GVHD and encouraging long-term results, especially if molecular remission is achieved.

Genetic Background of Immune Complications after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Children

Immune reactions are among the most serious complications observed after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in children. Microarray technique allows for simultaneous assessment of expression of nearly all human genes. The objective of the study was to compare the whole genome expression in children before and after HSCT. A total of 33 children referred for HSCT were enrolled in the study. In 70% of the patients HSCT was performed for the treatment of neoplasms. Blood samples were obtained before HSCT and six months after the procedure. Subsequently, the whole genome expression was assessed in leukocytes using GeneChip Human Gene 1.0 ST microarray. The analysis of genomic profiles before and after HSCT revealed altered expression of 124 genes. Pathway enrichment analysis revealed upregulation of five pathways after HSCT: allograft rejection, graft-versus-host disease, type I diabetes mellitus, autoimmune thyroid disease, and viral myocarditis. The activation of those pathways seems to be related to immune reactions commonly observed after HSCT. Our results contribute to better understanding of the genomic background of the immunologic complications of HSCT.

Multiple Myeloma, Version 2.2016: Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignant neoplasm of plasma cells that accumulate in bone marrow, leading to bone destruction and marrow failure. Recent statistics from the American Cancer Society indicate that the incidence of MM is increasing. The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) included in this issue address management of patients with solitary plasmacytoma and newly diagnosed MM.

Donor lymphocyte infusion after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Donor lymphocyte infusion, a rescue therapy after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, has been increasingly adopted, as modalities of stem cell transplantation have widened. First described as donor lymphocyte transfusion or cell therapy, it consists of infusion of donor lymphocytes, collected in steady state or after growth factor enhancement. As in literature the most used name is donor lymphocyte infusion, we'll adopt it here. Its most striking efficacy is observed in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia, who relapsed after allogeneic stem cells transplantation. However, graft-versus-host disease, its main complication, may still hamper its feasibility.

Salvage chemotherapy followed by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-primed donor leukocyte infusion with graft-vs.-host disease control for minimal residual disease in acute leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: prognostic factors and clinical outcomes

This study investigated the prognostic factors and clinical outcomes of preemptive chemotherapy followed by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-primed donor leukocyte infusion (Chemo-DLI) according to minimal residual disease (MRD) status in patients with acute leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes who received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) (n = 101). Patients received immunosuppressive drugs to prevent graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD) after Chemo-DLI. The 3-yr cumulative incidences of relapse, non-relapse mortality, and disease-free survival (DFS) after HSCT were 39.5%, 9.6%, and 51.7%, respectively. The cumulative incidences of relapse and DFS were significantly poorer in patients who exhibited early-onset MRD. Forty-four patients turned MRD negative 1 month after Chemo-DLI; their cumulative incidences of relapse and DFS were significantly better than those with persistent MRD 1 month after preemptive Chemo-DLI (relapse: 19.8% vs. 46.8%, P = 0.001; DFS: 69.6% vs. 46.4%, P = 0.004). The cumulative incidences of relapse and DFS after HSCT were significantly better in patients with chronic GVHD (cGVHD) than those without cGVHD (relapse: 19.6% vs. 63.7%, P < 0.001; DFS: 74.4% vs. 23.8%, P < 0.001). Early-onset MRD, persistent MRD after Chemo-DLI, and non-cGVHD after Chemo-DLI, which were associated with increased relapse and impaired DFS, suggest unsatisfactory response to preemptive Chemo-DLI.

Epigenetic therapy in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

DNA methylation and other epigenetic phenomena appear to be relevant in the pathogenesis of several malignant disorders. DNA methyltransferases add methyl groups to cytosine-phosphate-guanine (CpG) islandsleading to gene promoter silencing. The DNA methyltransferases inhibitors azacitidine and decitabine have anti-tumor activity against a broad range of malignancies, but have been investigated mostly in myelodysplastic syndrome. In addition, these agents have immunomodulatory effects that are under investigation in the allogeneic stem cell transplantation scenario. Both drugs have been used in the perioperative period of allogeneic transplantations with varying degrees of success. It has been hypothesized that low dose azacitidine may increase the graft-versus-leukemia effect and have a role in the maintenance of remission after allogeneic transplantation for myeloid leukemias. It is also intriguing that this favorable effect might occur while mitigating graft-versus-host disease. Here we present a review of the rapidly growing field of epigenetic manipulation using hypomethylating agents in allogeneic transplantation.

Promising role of reduced-toxicity hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (PART-I)

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains a potential curative option for many patients with hematological malignancies (HM). However, the high rate of transplantation-related mortality (TRM) restricted the use of standard myeloablative HSCT to a minority of young and fit patients. Over the past few years, it has become evident that the alloreactivity of the immunocompetent donor cells mediated anti-malignancy effects independent of the action of high dose chemoradiotherapy. The use of reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens has allowed a graft-versus-malignancy (GvM) effect to be exploited in patients who were previously ineligible for HSCT on the grounds of age and comorbidity. Retrospective analysis showed that RIC has been associated with lower TRM but a higher relapse rate leading to similar intermediate term overall and progression-free survivals when compared to standard myeloablative HSCT. However, the long term antitumor effect of this approach is less well established. Prospective studies are ongoing to define which patients might most benefit from reduced toxicity stem cell transplant (RT-SCT) and which transplant protocols are suitable for the different types of HM. The advent of RT-SCT permits the delivery of a potentially curative GvM effect to the majority of patients with HM whose outcome with conventional chemotherapy would be dismal. Remaining challenges include development of effective strategies to reduce relapse rates by augmenting GvM effects without increasing toxicity.

Monoclonal antibody-based immunotherapy for multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a life-threatening hematological malignancy. High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation is a relatively effective treatment, but disease recurrence remains a major obstacle. Allogeneic transplantation may result in durable responses and cure due to antitumor immunity mediated by donor lymphocytes. However, morbidity and mortality related to graft-versus-host disease remain a challenge. Recent advances in understanding the interaction between the immune system of the patient and the malignant cells are influencing the design of clinically more efficient study protocols for MM. This review will focus on MM antigens and their specific antibodies. These monoclonal antibodies are an attractive therapeutic tool for MM humoral immunotherapy, with most promising preclinical results.

Bortezomib plus dexamethasone followed by escalating donor lymphocyte infusions for patients with multiple myeloma relapsing or progressing after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Multiple myeloma relapsing after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) has a poor outcome. To assess the safety and efficacy of bortezomib and dexamethasone (VD) combination followed by donor lymphocyte infusions (DLIs) in myeloma patients relapsing or progressing after alloSCT, a prospective phase II study was designed. The treatment plan consisted of three VD courses followed by escalated doses of DLIs in case of response or at least stable disease. Nineteen patients were enrolled with a median age of 57 years (range, 33 to 67); 14 patients were allografted from human leukocyte antigen-identical siblings and 5 from alternative donors. Sixteen of 19 patients received the planned treatment, but 3 patients did not: 2 patients because of disease progression and 1 refused. After the VD phase the response rate was 62%, with 1 complete remission, 6 very good partial remissions, 5 partial remissions, 2 patients with stable disease, and 5 with progressive disease. After the DLI phase, the response rate was 68%, but a significant upgrade of response was observed: 3 stringent complete remissions, 2 complete remissions, 5 very good partial remissions, 1 partial remission, 4 with stable disease, and 1 with progressive disease. With a median follow-up of 40 months (range, 29 to 68), the 3-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 31% and 73%, respectively. Neither unexpected organ toxicities, in particular severe neuropathy, nor severe acute graft-versus-host disease flares were observed. VD-DLIs is a safe treatment for multiple myeloma patients relapsing or progressing after alloSCT and may be effective.

Donor CD3(+) lymphocyte infusion after reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic stem cell transplantation: single-center experience

Donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) can induce remission in patients with hematologic malignancies who relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. However, graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) remains a major complication of this strategy. We have used escalating doses of DLI for many years, and wanted to assess the risk factors for GVHD and transplant-related mortality as well as disease outcomes according to the reason for DLI. We analyzed 65 patients who received a total of 111 DLI for different reasons and at different intervals after transplantation. Median number of DLI was 2 (range, 1-4), median interval between transplantation and DLI was 9 months (range, 1-41 months) and median number of infused CD3(+) cells/kg recipient body weight was 2.5 × 10(7) (range, 1 × 10(6)-11.8 × 10(7)). Reasons for DLI were relapse or progression in 37 patients (57%), residual disease in 15 patients (23%), and persistence of mixed chimerism in 13 patients (20%). Seven patients (11%) developed acute GVHD grade II to IV and 5 patients (8%) developed extensive chronic GVHD. In univariate analysis, we could identify a transplantation-DLI interval ≤6 months, the dose of DLI (≥1 × 10(7)), and DLI number as predictive factors of GVHD. In multivariate analysis, these results were confirmed only for the transplantation-DLI interval (hazard ratio = 19.48; 2.23-170.34; p = 0.007). Our findings indicate that this form of adoptive immunotherapy is well tolerated and induces a low incidence of GVHD and transplant-related mortality, supporting further investigation as an upfront modality to enhance the graft-vs-tumor response in high-risk patients.

Durable responses after donor lymphocyte infusion for patients with residual multiple myeloma following non-myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplant

The role of donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) in mediating the graft-versus-myeloma (GvM) effect after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HCT) is not clearly defined. We evaluated the safety and utility of DLI in patients with either persistent or recurrent multiple myeloma (MM) after allo-HCT. Twenty-three patients with MM received DLI after allo-HCT at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center between July 1996 and June 2008. Eight patients received preemptive DLI for residual disease (RD) while 15 patients received DLI for the treatment of recurrent or progressive disease (PD). We evaluated the response to DLI and the factors that may predict a response. Median DLI dose was 3.3 × 10(7) CD3 + cells (range 0.5-14.8 × 10(7)). Grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) was seen in five patients (22%). Median follow-up in surviving patients was 24 months. Five of 23 patients (22%) achieved a complete or a very good partial response (two CR, three VGPR), while eight patients (34%) had stable disease (SD) after the DLI. Patients who received DLI for RD had a higher response rate (≥ VGPR 50% vs. 7%, p = 0.03), a longer overall survival (28.3 vs. 7.6 months, p = 0.03) and a trend toward longer progression-free survival (11.9 vs. 5.2 months, p = 0.1). In this largest single institution study, we conclude that the use of preemptive, non-manipulated DLI for RD after reduced-intensity conditioning allo-HCT is encouraging, and it was associated with a higher response rate and a longer overall survival when given preemptively. The role of DLI needs to be further explored in prospective clinical trials.

Novel strategies for immunotherapy in multiple myeloma: previous experience and future directions

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a life-threatening haematological malignancy for which standard therapy is inadequate. Autologous stem cell transplantation is a relatively effective treatment, but residual malignant sites may cause relapse. Allogeneic transplantation may result in durable responses due to antitumour immunity mediated by donor lymphocytes. However, morbidity and mortality related to graft-versus-host disease remain a challenge. Recent advances in understanding the interaction between the immune system of the patient and the malignant cells are influencing the design of clinically more efficient study protocols for MM. Cellular immunotherapy using specific antigen-presenting cells (APCs), to overcome aspects of immune incompetence in MM patients, has received great attention, and numerous clinical trials have evaluated the potential for dendritic cell (DC) vaccines as a novel immunotherapeutic approach. This paper will summarize the data investigating aspects of immunity concerning MM, immunotherapy for patients with MM, and strategies, on the way, to target the plasma cell more selectively. We also include the MM antigens and their specific antibodies that are of potential use for MM humoral immunotherapy, because they have demonstrated the most promising preclinical results.

Lenalidomide plus donor-lymphocytes infusion after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation with reduced-intensity conditioning in patients with high-risk multiple myeloma

Myeloma relapse is the main cause of death after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. The aim of our observational study was to evaluate the anti-myeloma effect of lenalidomide followed by donor-lymphocyte infusion (DLI) as post-transplantation adoptive immunotherapy. Twelve patients with refractory myeloma were analyzed. The median age at transplantation was 56 years (range, 46-64 years). All patients received reduced-intensity conditioning. Patients were included if progressive or residual disease was observed at day +100 and if no signs of graft-vs-host disease were evident. DLIs were administered after two cycles of lenalidomide. Median dose of lenalidomide was 15 mg (range, 10-25 mg). Patients received a median of six cycles (range, 1-10 cycles). Nine patients (60%) received an escalating dose of DLI. The 1 and 2-year probability of progression-free survival was 75% and 50%, and overall survival was 83% and 69%, respectively. Median overall survival was not reached and median progression-free survival was 23 months. Lenalidomide is well tolerated after allogeneic stem cell transplantation; the combination with DLI did not cause a higher risk of graft-vs-host disease; an immunological synergistic effect was probably present with this strategy. This combination should be evaluated further in a larger cohort of patients.

Approaches to relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Relapse has become the leading cause of death following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Despite improved understanding of the biology that underlies the graft-versus-leukemia/tumor effect the relapse rate did not decrease over the past 20 years. In general, prognosis is poor for patients who relapsed to an allograft since effective treatment options are limited. Here, we review the available and upcoming treatment approaches for relapse.

RECENT FINDINGS

Treatment of relapse after allogeneic HSCT has been rarely investigated systematically and results differ substantially from diseases. Withdrawal of immunosuppressive medication, donor lymphocyte infusions with or without chemotherapy and/or second allogeneic HSCT are the most used options. New specific cellular approaches such as disease-specific T-cells, alloreactive natural killer cells or vaccination strategies are under investigation. Novel agents such as tyrosine-kinase inhibitors, hypomethylating agents, monoclonal antibodies, immunomodulating drugs, or proteasome-inhibitors either alone or in combination with adoptive immunotherapy are upcoming promising options, but valid data are lacking so far.

SUMMARY

With some exceptions (chronic myeloid leukemia), treatment options for patients who relapse are limited. The results are poor and the majority of patients ultimately die of their disease. More effort and research is needed to prevent and treat relapse after allogeneic HSCT.

Allogeneic immunotherapy to optimize the graft-versus-tumor effect: concepts and controversies

This article focuses on the recent evolution of novel conditioning regimens in combination with adoptive cellular therapy in the allogeneic transplant setting for hematologic malignancies. Building on data from animal models, the field of allogeneic transplantation is undergoing a paradigm shift toward immunosuppressive regimens with less toxicity that allow donor hematopoietic engraftment in order to provide a graft-versus-tumor effect as the primary goal of transplantation, rather than chemoablation. In addition, the strategies described in this article, including the use of T-cell subsets as adoptive therapy, will apply to a much broader pool of patients than traditional transplant approaches, thereby allowing more patients with life-limiting illnesses, previously deemed ineligible, to pursue therapy with curative intent.

Unrelated stem cell transplantation for patients with multiple myeloma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The role of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) in treatment of myeloma patients is still controversial. Meanwhile, the numbers of unrelated SCT for hematological diseases in Europe are higher than for human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical sibling transplantations, but in multiple myeloma only 39% of the allogeneic transplantations are performed from unrelated donors and only a minority were done within prospective clinical trials.

RECENT FINDINGS

The few published data of unrelated SCT in multiple myeloma reported a higher treatment-related mortality for standard myeloablative conditioning in comparison to reduced-intensity conditioning. Despite the heterogeneous patient selection in the trial, lower nonrelapse mortality and improved survival can be achieved by careful donor selection (10/10 HLA-alleles, male donor). Natural killer-alloreactivity might play a role, but conclusive data are lacking. Transplantation in more advanced or refractory patients is associated with an inferior outcome. The results of an unrelated SCT seem to be comparable to those of HLA-identical siblings, but a direct comparison is lacking so far.

SUMMARY

Unrelated SCT in multiple myeloma is feasible, but prospective clinical trials using unrelated stem cell donors are urgently needed to define the role of an unrelated SCT in multiple myeloma in the era of novel agents.

NCI First International Workshop on the Biology, Prevention, and Treatment of Relapse after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Report from the Committee on Treatment of Relapse after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Relapse is a major cause of treatment failure after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT). Treatment options for relapse have been inadequate, and the majority of patients ultimately die of their disease. There is no standard approach to treating relapse after alloHSCT. Withdrawal of immune suppression and donor lymphocyte infusions are commonly used for all diseases; although these interventions are remarkably effective for relapsed chronic myelogenous leukemia, they have limited efficacy in other hematologic malignancies. Conventional and novel chemotherapy, monoclonal antibody therapy, targeted therapies, and second transplants have been utilized in a variety of relapsed diseases, but reports on these therapies are generally anecdotal and retrospective. As such, there is an immediate need for well-designed, disease-specific trials for treatment of relapse after alloHSCT. This report summarizes current treatment options under investigation for relapse after alloHSCT in a disease-specific manner. In addition, recommendations are provided for specific areas of research necessary in the treatment of relapse after alloHSCT.

Treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma in the era of novel agents

The introduction of the Immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) and proteasome inhibitors, used either as a single-agent or combined with classic anti-myeloma therapies, has improved the outcome for patients with relapsed myeloma. However, there is currently no generally accepted standard treatment for relapsed/refractory myeloma patients, partly because of the absence of trials comparing the efficacy of the novel agents in relapsed/refractory myeloma. Choice of a new treatment regimen depends on both patient and disease-specific characteristics. A lenalidomide-based regimen is the first choice in patients with neuropathy, while bortezomib has the highest efficacy in patients with renal insufficiency and is not associated with increased risk of thromboembolism. A second autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) can be applied in patients with a progression-free period of ≥ 18-24 months after the first auto-SCT. In high-risk relapse such as occurring early after auto-SCT consolidation with allogeneic SCT can be considered. In this review we provide an overview of the various salvage regimens and give recommendations for treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma in different clinical settings.

Allogenic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation with reduced-intensity conditioning in patients with refractory and recurrent multiple myeloma: long-term follow-up

BACKGROUND

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) with myeloablative conditioning is potentially curative therapy for myeloma, but is reportedly associated with a high risk of nonrecurrence mortality (NRM). Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) allows for the reduction of NRM, but the recurrence rate is increased. The role and timing of allogeneic SCT in the disease course remains controversial. To the authors' knowledge, there are limited data regarding the long-term outcome of RIC in the recurrent/refractory setting.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted of SCT outcomes in 50 patients who received RIC for recurrent/refractory myeloma between the years 2001 and 2004. All patients were given fludarabine-melphalan based conditioning and stem cell grafts from a related (n=27) or unrelated donor (n=23).

RESULTS

The median age was 53 years. Forty-seven patients failed a prior autologous SCT. Thirty patients were in disease remission at the time of SCT and 20 had stable or progressive disease. With a median follow-up of 6.4 years (range, 5-7.9 years), the overall and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 34% and 26%, respectively. The NRM rate was 26%. Adverse prognostic factors for survival included SCT not in remission, long duration of disease (>5 years from diagnosis), and transplantation from a female donor to a male recipient. The 7-year PFS in 19 patients with none of these adverse prognostic factors was 47%. Chronic graft versus host disease and the achievement of complete remission after SCT were associated with improved outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Allogeneic SCT can result in long-term PFS in a subset of myeloma patients who fail prior therapy and should be considered early after failure and after achieving remission.

Partial T cell-depleted allogeneic stem cell transplantation following reduced-intensity conditioning creates a platform for immunotherapy with donor lymphocyte infusion and recipient dendritic cell vaccination in multiple myeloma

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) in multiple myeloma (MM) may induce a curative graft-versus-myeloma (GVM) effect. Major drawback in unmanipulated reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) SCT is the risk of severe and longstanding graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD). This study demonstrates that transplantation with a partial T cell-depleted graft creates a platform for boosting GVM immunity by preemptive donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) and recipient dendritic cell (DC) vaccination, with limited GVHD. All 20MM patients engrafted successfully. Chimerism analysis in 19 patients evaluable at 3 months revealed that 7 patients were complete donor, whereas 12 patients were mixed chimeric. Grade II acute GVHD (aGVHD) occurred in 7 patients (35%) and only 4 patients (21%) developed chronic GVHD (cGVHD). Fourteen patients received posttransplantation immunotherapy, 8 preemptive DLI, 5 patients both DLI and DC vaccination, and 1 patient DC vaccination only. DC vaccination was associated with limited toxicity, and none of these patients developed GVHD. Importantly, overall treatment-related mortality (TRM) at 1 year was low (10%). Moreover, the overall survival (OS) is 84% with median follow-up of 27 months, and none of the patients died from progressive disease. These findings illustrate that this novel approach is associated with limited GVHD and mortality, thus creating an ideal platform for adjuvant immunotherapy.

Autologous-allogeneic tandem stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma

The decrease in treatment-related mortality by using reduced intensity conditioning and the well-proven immunological effect of the graft to multiple myeloma cells has increased the interest in using allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma. The concept of a cytoreductive autograft followed by a dose-reduced allogeneic stem cell transplantation appears to be the most promising approach. Preliminary reports of several groups observed a treatment-related mortality at 1 year ranged from 0-17%. The rate of acute graft-vs.-host disease (GvHD) grade II-IV ranged from 32-44% and of chronic GvHD from 28-64%. The overall response rates for all studies ranged from 68-83%, including a high rate of complete remissions of 52-83%. The overall survival at 2 or 3 years was between 62% and 78%, and the progression-free survival between 54% and 56%. Despite the high rate of complete remissions after autologous-allogeneic tandem transplantation observed in nearly all trials, the relapse rate is quite considerable and exceeded nearly 40% at 2 years. Therefore, the reduced allogeneic treatment approach in patients with multiple myeloma has still to be improved and further preclinical and clinical research is focused on two major issues: (i) to further reduce treatment-related mortality and (ii) to enhance the remission status after transplantation, via adoptive immunotherapy inducing molecular remission and enhancing the cure rate of this approach.

Post-transplant immunotherapy with donor-lymphocyte infusion and novel agents to upgrade partial into complete and molecular remission in allografted patients with multiple myeloma

OBJECTIVE

To investigate post-transplant immunotherapy with escalating donor-lymphocyte infusions (DLI) and novel agents (thalidomide, bortezomib, and lenalidomide) to target complete remission (CR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-two patients with multiple myeloma who achieved only partial remission after allogeneic stem cell transplantation were treated with DLI. If no CR was achieved, one of the novel agents was added to target CR.

RESULTS

CR defined either by European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation criteria, flow cytometry, or molecular methods as assessed by patient-specific immunoglobulin H-polymerase chain reaction or plasma cell chimerism polymerase chain reaction was accomplished in 59%, 63%, and 50% of patients, respectively. Achievement of CR resulted in improved 5-year progressive-free and overall survival, according to European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation criteria (53% vs 35%; p=0.03 and 90% vs 62%; p=0.06), flow cytometry (74% vs 15%; p=0.001 and 100% vs 52%; p=0.1), or molecular methods (84% vs 38%; p=0.001 and 100% vs 71%; p=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Our finding demonstrates the clinical relevance of posttransplantation therapies to upgrade remission, and of remission's depth for long-term survival in myeloma patients.

Mini-Midi-Maxi? How to harness the graft-versus-myeloma effect and target molecular remission after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma after standard myeloablative conditioning induces a high rate of complete remissions, but long-term freedom from disease is achieved in 30-40% of the cases only. The therapeutic effect of allogeneic stem cell transplantation is due to cytotoxicity of high-dose chemotherapy and immune-mediated graft-versus-myeloma effect by donor T cells. Retrospective studies clearly suggest that both (a) reducing the intensity of high-dose chemotherapy by using reduced-intensity or non-myeloablative conditioning regimen or (b) reducing the immunotherapy of donor T cells by using T-cell depletion result in lower treatment-related morbidity and mortality, but also in higher rate of relapse. Therefore, this review will focus on potential strategies of how treatment-related morbidity and mortality might be kept low without an increased risk of relapse and how remission status after transplantation can be enhanced by using the newly established donor immunosystems after allografting as a platform for post-transplant treatment strategies with new drugs (thalidomide, lenalidomide, bortezomib) or immunotherapy (donor lymphocyte infusion, vaccination, tumor-specific T cells) in order to achieve remission on a molecular level, which seems to be a 'conditio sine qua non' to cure myeloma patients.

Prognostic factors for donor lymphocyte infusions following non-myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma

In this retrospective study, we evaluated donor lymphocyte infusions given for relapsed (n=48) or persistent (n=15) myeloma following non-myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation (Allo-SCT). Twenty-four of 63 patients (38.1%) responded: 12 patients (19.0%) with a partial response (PR) and 12 patients (19.0%) with a complete response (CR). Overall survival after donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) was 23.6 months (1.0-50.7+). Median overall survival for non-responding patients was 23.6 months and has not been reached for the patients responding to DLI. In responders, progression-free survival after DLI was 27.8 months (1.2-46.2+). Patients with a PR had a median progression-free survival of 7.0 months, whereas patients with a CR to DLI had a median progression-free survival of 27.8 months. Major toxicities were acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (38.1%) and chronic GVHD (42.9%). Seven patients (11.1%) died from treatment-related mortality. The only significant prognostic factors for response to DLI were the occurrence of acute and chronic GVHD. There was a trend towards significance for time between transplantation and DLI, and response. Donor lymphocyte infusion following non-myeloablative Allo-SCT is a valuable strategy for relapsed or persistent disease.

The current status of reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma

Of all the treatment modalities employed to control multiple myeloma, only allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is potentially curative, due in large part to a graft-versus-myeloma (GVM) effect. Whereas patients who receive either allogeneic or autologous stem cell transplants for multiple myeloma have similar 3-5-year survival, only allograft recipients appear to enjoy long-term disease-free survival. High transplant-related mortality (TRM) associated with allogeneic stem cell transplantation is currently the major limitation to wider use of this potentially curative modality. This high mortality has been the major impetus for exploration of reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens designed to allow engraftment of allogeneic stem cells. With follow-up now extending to 7 years, it is clear that when compared to myeloablative transplants, RIC allografts are associated with lower TRM; however, reduced mortality comes at a cost of higher rates of disease progression and relapse. Strategies designed to improve the therapeutic index of allografts include the use of more intensive, yet still non-myeloablative conditioning regimens, tandem autologous plus RIC allografts, peripheral blood cells rather than bone marrow, graft engineering to improve the GVM activity while reducing graft-versus-host disease, post-transplant maintenance and targeted conditioning therapies such as bone-seeking radioisotopes.

Stem cell transplantation with reduced-intensity conditioning regimens: a review of ten years experience with new transplant concepts and new therapeutic agents

The realization in the 1990s that allogeneic stem cell transplants (SCT) have a potentially curative graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect in addition to the antileukemic action of myeloablative conditioning regimens was a major stimulus for the development of reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens, aimed primarily at securing engraftment to provide the GVL effect, while minimizing regimen-related toxicity. It is now over 10 years since RIC regimens were heralded as a new direction in the field of SCT. Over the last decade much has been learned about the ways in which the conditioning regimen can be tailored to provide adequate immunosuppression, and modulated to deliver a chosen degree of antimalignant treatment. The huge literature of clinical data with RIC transplantation now permits us to more clearly define the success and limitations of the approach. This review examines the origins of RIC SCT, explores the degree to which the initial expectations and purpose of the approach have been realized, and outlines some ways forward for the field.

Bortezomib after dose-reduced allogeneic stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma to enhance or maintain remission status

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the effect of at least two cycles of bortezomib (1.3 mg/m(2) intravenously, days 1, 4, 8, and 11) after dose-reduced allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) on toxicity, CD3(+) cells, graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), and response in patients with multiple myeloma.

METHODS

Eighteen patients with multiple myeloma without progressive disease were included. The proteasome inhibitor was given at median of 8 months after allografting to enhance or maintain remission status.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients (78%) completed the proposed two cycles. Four patients had to discontinue therapy due to neurotoxicity (n = 3) or gastrointestinal toxicity (n = 1). Severe grade III/IV toxicity was seen for thrombocytopenia (50%), leukopenia (17%), or neuropathy (17%), which was more often seen in patients treated concomitantly with cyclosporine (p = 0.06). The median circulating CD3(+) cells decreased during treatment from 550 muL to 438 muL (p = 0.03), resulting in herpes zoster infection in three patients (17%). In three patients, a mild aggravation of existing acute or chronic GvHD of the skin, and in one patient de novo skin grade I acute GvHD was noted. In patients with measurable disease, complete remission, partial remission, and minor response was seen in 3 (30%), 5 (50%), and 2 (20%) patients, respective.

CONCLUSION

Bortezomib after allogeneic SCT is effective but further studies are needed to balance the efficacy with potential hazards such as infectious complications, aggravation of GvHD, and neurotoxicity.

Kinetics of plasma-cell chimerism after allogeneic stem cell transplantation by highly sensitive real-time PCR based on sequence polymorphism and its value to quantify minimal residual disease in patients with multiple myeloma

OBJECTIVE

To investigate lineage-specific chimerism of plasma cells after allogeneic transplantation by real-time PCR based on bi-allelic sequence polymorphism or, in case of female-to-male transplantation, on the detection of the DFFRY gene and to determine its value to quantify minimal residual disease in myeloma patients.

METHODS

Forty-eight samples from bone marrow samples and peripheral blood from 34 nonmyeloma patients were analyzed at different times after transplantation. Sixty-two samples from 22 myeloma patients were analyzed at different times after allogeneic stem cell transplantation, and results were compared with immunofixation and, in some cases, with PCR data using patient-specific primers.

RESULTS

The median chimerism for T cells at day +100 was greater than 99.9% and remained stable on day +180 and 1 year after transplantation. In contrast, the median donor plasma cell chimerism at day +100 was 95.5%, at day +180 98.6%, at day +360 99.8%, and 2 or more years after transplantation greater than 99.9%. Sensitivity of real-time PCR using human short insertion/deletion polymorphisms (SIDP) was 10(-4) and in case of Y-PCR 10(-5). Sequential monitoring of donor plasma cell chimerism showed that increasing and stable chimerism were associated with ongoing remission in 15 out of 16 samples (93%), and decreases in chimerism predicted relapse in 5 out of 6 patients.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that plasma cell chimerism after allogeneic stem cell transplantation is delayed in comparison to T-cell chimerism. Sequential quantitative measurement of plasma cells after allogeneic stem cell transplantation with highly sensitive real-time PCR allows monitoring of residual host-tumor cells in patients with multiple myeloma and allows guiding adoptive immunotherapy strategies to enhance remission status and to prevent clinical relapse.

Comparison between antithymocyte globulin and alemtuzumab and the possible impact of KIR-ligand mismatch after dose-reduced conditioning and unrelated stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma

We compared antithymocyte globulin (ATG) with alemtuzumab in 73 patients with multiple myeloma, who underwent reduced conditioning with melphalan/fludarabine, followed by allogeneic stem cell transplantation from human leucocyte antigen-matched or -mismatched unrelated donors. The ATG group had more prior high-dose chemotherapies (P < 0.001), while bone marrow was used more as the stem cell source in the alemtuzumab group (P < 0.001). Alemtuzumab resulted in faster engraftment of leucocytes (P = 0.03) and platelets (P = 0.02) and in a lower incidence of acute graft versus host disease (GvHD) grades II-IV (24% vs. 47%, P = 0.06). More cytomegalovirus (CMV) seropositive patients in the alemtuzumab group experienced CMV reactivation (100% vs. 47%, P = 0.001). The cumulative incidence of treatment-related mortality at 2 years was 26% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 12-37%] for ATG vs. 28% (95% CI = 15-55%) for alemtuzumab, P = 0.7. There was no significant difference in the estimated 2-year overall and progression-free survival between ATG and alemtuzumab: 54% (95% CI: 39-75%) vs. 45% (95% CI: 28-73%) and 30% (95% CI: 16-55%) vs. 36% (95% CI: 20-62%) respectively. In multivariate analysis, treatment with alemtuzumab had a higher risk for relapse (hazard ratio: 2.37; P = 0.05) while killer immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIR)-ligand mismatch was protective for relapse (P < 0.0001). We conclude that alemtuzumab produced less acute GvHD, but higher probability of relapse. The data implicated a major role of KIR-ligand mismatched transplantation in multiple myeloma.

Low-dose thalidomide and donor lymphocyte infusion as adoptive immunotherapy after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma

To improve the antimyeloma effect of donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma, we investigated in a phase 1/2 study the effect of low-dose thalidomide (100 mg) followed by DLI in 18 patients with progressive disease or residual disease and prior ineffective DLI after allografting. The overall response rate was 67%, including 22% complete remission. Major toxicity of thalidomide was weakness grade I/II (68%) and peripheral neuropathy grade I/II (28%). Only 2 patients experienced mild grade I acute graft versus host disease (aGvHD) of the skin, while no grades II to IV aGvHD was seen. De novo limited chronic GvHD (cGvHD) was seen in 2 patients (11%). The 2-year estimated overall and progression-free survival were 100% and 84%, respectively. Adoptive immunotherapy with low-dose thalidomide and DLI induces a strong antimyeloma effect with low incidence of graft versus host disease. (Blood. 2004;104:3361-3363)