Lack of germline CDK6 mutations in familial melanoma

Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation for First GPX4 and CDK Dual Inhibitors

The coexistence of ferroptosis and other modes of death has great advantages in the treatment of cancers. A series of glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) and cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) dual inhibitors were designed and synthesized, given the synergistic anticancer effect of ML162 (GPX4 inhibitor) in combination with indirubin-3'-oxime (IO) (CDK inhibitor). Compound B9 exhibited the highest potential cytotoxic activity against all four cell lines and displayed excellent inhibitory activity against GPX4 (IC50 = 542.5 ± 0.9 nM) and selective inhibition of CDK 4/6 (IC50 = 191.2 ± 8.7, 68.1 ± 1.4 nM). Mechanism research showed that B9 could simultaneously induce ferroptosis and arrest cells at the G1 phase in both MDA-MB-231 cells and HCT-116 cells. Compared with ML162 and IO, B9 showed much stronger cancer cell growth inhibition in vivo. These results proved that developing potent GPX4/CDK dual inhibitors is a promising strategy for the malignant cancer therapy.

Cyclin D-CDK4/6 functions in cancer

The mammalian cell cycle is driven by a complex of cyclins and their associated cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs). Abnormal dysregulation of cyclin-CDK is a hallmark of cancer. D-type cyclins and their associated CDKs (CDK4 and CDK6) are key components of cell cycle machinery in driving G1 to S phase transition via phosphorylating and inactivating the retinoblastoma protein (RB). A body of evidence shows that the cyclin Ds-CDKs axis plays a critical role in cancer through various aspects, such as control of proliferation, senescence, migration, apoptosis, and angiogenesis. CDK4/6 dual-inhibitors show significant efficacy in pre-clinical or clinical cancer therapies either as single agents or in combination with hormone, chemotherapy, irradiation or immune treatments. Of note, as the associated partner of D-type cyclins, CDK6 shows multiple distinct functions from CDK4 in cancer. Depletion of the individual CDK may provide a therapeutic strategy for patients with cancer.

ATP-noncompetitive CDK inhibitors for cancer therapy: an overview

INTRODUCTION

Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) are the key drivers of cell cycle progression and are often deregulated in cancer, therefore, targeting CDKs has long been pursued as a therapeutic strategy to tackle cancer. Unfortunately, however, none of the first-generation CDK inhibitors has yielded the expected efficacy to be successfully translated to the clinic mostly because, by targeting the very conserved kinase ATP-binding site resulted to be poorly specific and quite toxic.

AREAS COVERED

Here, the authors review recent approaches aimed at developing more specific CDK inhibitors mostly through the aid of computational drug design studies and report various small molecules and peptides, which resulted in promising CDK ATP-noncompetitive inhibitors.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite few successes, these new approaches still need additional considerations to generate effective antitumoral agents. The authors discuss some of the hurdles to overcome for a successful clinical translation.

p16INK4a-induced senescence is disabled by melanoma-associated mutations

The p16^INK4a-Rb tumour suppressor pathway is required for the initiation and maintenance of cellular senescence, a state of permanent growth arrest that acts as a natural barrier against cancer progression. Senescence can be overcome if the pathway is not fully engaged, and this may occur when p16^INK4a is inactivated. p16^INK4a is frequently altered in human cancer and germline mutations affecting p16^INK4a have been linked to melanoma susceptibility. To characterize the functions of melanoma-associated p16^INK4a mutations, in terms of promoting proliferative arrest and initiating senescence, we utilized an inducible expression system in a melanoma cell model. We show that wild-type p16^INK4a promotes rapid cell cycle arrest that leads to a senescence programme characterized by the appearance of chromatin foci, activation of acidic β-galactosidase activity, p53 independence and Rb dependence. Accumulation of wild-type p16^INK4a also promoted cell enlargement and extensive vacuolization independent of Rb status. In contrast, the highly penetrant p16^INK4a variants, R24P and A36P failed to arrest cell proliferation and did not initiate senescence. We also show that overexpression of CDK4, or its homologue CDK6, but not the downstream kinase, CDK2, inhibited the ability of wild-type p16^INK4a to promote cell cycle arrest and senescence. Our data provide the first evidence that p16^INK4a can initiate a CDK4/6-dependent autonomous senescence programme that is disabled by inherited melanoma-associated mutations.

A CDKN2A mutation in familial melanoma that abrogates binding of p16INK4a to CDK4 but not CDK6

The CDKN2A locus encodes two distinct proteins, p16INK4a and p14ARF, both of which are implicated in replicative senescence and tumor suppression in different contexts. Here, we describe the characterization of a novel strain of human diploid fibroblasts (designated Milan HDFs) from an individual who is homozygous for the R24P mutation in p16INK4a. As this mutation occurs in the first exon of INK4a (exon 1alpha), it has no effect on the primary sequence of p14(ARF). Based on both in vitro and in vivo analyses, the R24P variant is specifically defective for binding to CDK4 but remains able to associate with CDK6. Nevertheless, Milan HDFs behave as if they are p16INK4a deficient, in terms of sensitivity to spontaneous and oncogene-induced senescence, and the R24P variant has little effect on proliferation when ectopically expressed in normal fibroblasts. It can, however, impair the proliferation of U20S cells, presumably because they express more CDK6 than primary fibroblasts. These observations suggest that CDK4 and CDK6 are not functionally redundant and underscore the importance of CDK4 in the development of melanoma.

Structural basis for the modulation of CDK-dependent/independent activity of cyclin D1

D-type cyclins are key regulators of the cell division cycle. In association with Cyclin Dependent Kinases (CDK) 2/4/6, they control the G1/S-phase transition in part by phosphorylation and inactivation of tumor suppressor of retinoblastoma family. Defective regulation of the G1/S transition is a well-known cause of cancer, making the cyclin D1-CDK4/6 complex a promising therapeutic target. Our objective is to develop inhibitors that would block the formation or the activation of the cyclin D1-CDK4/6 complex, using in silico docking experiments on a structural homology model of the cyclin D1-CDK4/6 complex. To this end we focused on the cyclin subunit in three different ways: (1) targeting the part of the cyclin D1 facing the N-terminal domain of CDK4/6, in order to prevent the dimer formation; (2) targeting the part of the cyclin D1 facing the C-terminal domain of CDK4/6, in order to prevent the activation of CDK4/6 by blocking the T-loop in an inactive conformation, and also to destabilize the dimer; (3) targeting the groove of cyclin D1 where p21 binds, in order to mimic its inhibition mode by preventing binding of cyclin D1-CDK4/6 complex to its targets. Our strategy, and the tools we developed, will provide a computational basis to design lead compounds for novel cancer therapeutics, targeting a broad range of proteins involved in the regulation of the cell cycle.

Cytoplasmic and nuclear expression of survivin in melanocytic skin lesions

Survivin, a member of the inhibitors of apoptosis protein family, regulates both cellular proliferation and apoptotic cell death. While the human survivin gene is highly expressed in the developing fetus, in adults its expression is restricted to highly proliferating normal tissues and neoplastic tumors tissues. In the present study, we compared the expression of survivin in melanoma and benign melanocytic lesions such as junctional, compound, dermal, congenital, blue and spitz nevi. This analysis reveals a heterogeneous expression of survivin with respect to both the intensity, frequency and cellular localization. In junctional, compound and blue nevi, survivin was present in nuclear localization, whereas in spitz nevi survivin was detectable in the cytoplasm. In dermal and congenital nevi, survivin was present in both localizations with predominance of the nuclear compartment. Interestingly, this distribution was similar to that observed in primary melanoma; whereas in metastatic melanoma the predominance of the nuclear localization of survivin was lost. Our data demonstrate that although survivin is expressed in a large number of benign nevi, the balance between its cytoplasmic and nuclear expression was immensely heterogeneous between lesions with suspected different developmental origins.

Germline splicing mutations of CDKN2A predispose to melanoma

Coding mutations of the CDKN2A gene on chromosome 9p21 cosegregate with 25-60% of familial melanoma cases, but there remains a number of 9p21-linked kindreds that lack germline coding mutations of CDKN2A. We sequenced CDKN2A exons 1alpha, 2, 3, and the adjacent intronic regions in 167 melanoma-prone families (at least two affected first-degree relatives), and detected four splice site variations, three of which cosegregate with the disease. RT-PCR experiments verified that these three variants, including an AGgt to ATgt mutation that demonstrates a founder effect, do affect splicing. While an exon 1alpha splice donor site mutation incompletely abolishes splicing, the correctly spliced mRNA yields a protein (Q50P) that cannot effectively interact with CDK4. We also performed RT-PCR on mRNA from 16 melanoma-prone kindreds to search for cryptic splice sites deep within introns, but identified no splice variants. Meanwhile, we screened 139 affected families using allele-specific PCR for the recently discovered IVS2-105A>G mutation, but found only one family that possesses this alteration. We conclude that splice site mutations do predispose to disease in a subset of melanoma-prone kindreds. Characterization of additional splice site variants and other noncoding alterations of CDKN2A should allow us to detect a wider range of mutations in at-risk patients.

Is there a role for genetic testing in patients with melanoma?

Autosomal dominant inheritance of mutations in the locus or the gene may confer a high risk of cutaneous melanoma development. The penetrance of mutations is influenced by UV exposure. Inherited variants in the melanocortin-1 receptor also confer increased risk of cutaneous melanoma. Features associated with increased genetic susceptibility to cutaneous melanoma include the presence of multiple affected first-degree relatives on one side of the family, multiple primary melanomas in the same individual, earlier age of onset, and the presence of multiple atypical nevi, but none of these factors reliably predicts for the presence of mutations. It is currently premature to offer predictive DNA testing for melanoma outside of defined research protocols. This is because of (1). the low likelihood of finding mutations in known melanoma susceptibility genes, even in more than 60% of melanoma-prone kindreds; (2). the broad confidence limits on current estimates of lifetime penetrance of mutations and the wide variation in this penetrance with locality; (3). a high "background" incidence of melanoma in non-mutation carriers in melanoma-prone families; (4). current uncertainties about the factors determining the functionality and phenotypic expression of the trait among carriers of these mutations (penetrance), even if found; and (5). the lack of proved efficacy of melanoma prevention and surveillance strategies, even for mutation carriers. Rather than singling out those deemed to be at high risk because of family history, all patients carrying risk factors for cutaneous melanoma should be subject to stringent programs of sun protection and skin surveillance.

Rarity of CDK4 germline mutations in familial melanoma

To date, two genes have been implicated in melanoma pathogenesis. The first, CDKN2A, is a tumour suppressor gene with germline mutations detected in 20% of melanoma-prone families. The second, CDK4, is an oncogene with co-segregating germline mutations detected in only three kindreds worldwide. We examined 16 American melanoma-prone families for mutations in all coding exons of CDK4 and screened additional members of two previously reported families with the Arg24Cys germline CDK4 mutation to evaluate the penetrance of the mutation. No new CDK4 mutations were identified. In the two Arg24Cys families, the penetrance was estimated to be 63%. Overall, 12 out of 12 invasive melanoma patients, none out of one in situ melanoma patient, five out of 13 dysplastic naevi patients, two out of 15 unaffected family members, and none out of 10 spouses carried the Arg24Cys mutation. Dysplastic naevi did not strongly co-segregate with the Arg24Cys mutation. Thus the phenotype observed in melanoma-prone CDK4 families appears to be more complex than just the CDK4 mutation. Both genetic and environmental factors are likely to contribute to the occurrence of melanoma and dysplastic naevi in these families. In summary, although CDK4 is a melanoma susceptibility gene, it plays a minor role in hereditary melanoma.

Genetic and environmental factors in cutaneous malignant melanoma

Cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) is an interesting example of multifactorial disease, where both genetic and environmental factors are involved and interact. Major risk factors include a personal and familial history of melanoma, cutaneous and pigmentary characteristics, sun exposure and reactions to sun exposure. Phenotypic risk factors are likely to be genetically determined. Two high-risk melanoma susceptibility genes-CDKN2A and CDK4-have been identified to date, with a third gene p14(ARF) also being suspected of playing a role. Other high-risk genes are anticipated by the existence of 9p21-unlinked families. A low-risk melanoma-susceptibility gene-MC1R-has also been identified. Current studies aim to identify other susceptibility genes as well as to determine the respective contributions and interactions of the various genetic and environmental factors of CMM and associated phenotypes.

Update on genetic events in the pathogenesis of melanoma

Melanoma is the most common fatal malignancy among young adults, and its incidence and mortality continue to increase at an alarming rate. Epidemiologic studies have clearly demonstrated roles for genetic predisposition and sun exposure in melanoma development. In the past few years, substantial information has been added to the body of evidence suggesting that inherited and somatic genetic events contribute to the pathogenesis of melanoma. This review focuses on recent advances in the understanding of the genetic events, particularly aberration of cell cycle control and transcriptional control mechanisms, implicated in the pathogenesis of melanoma.

Genetics of familial and sporadic melanoma

Like many other cancers, melanoma has a significant genetic basis. However, its genetic pathways may involve multiple genes with probable interactions with sun exposure. Germline mutations in p16 or CDKN2A are found in a significant percentage of relatively rare melanoma families but p16 mutations are uncommon in sporadic tumours. p16 may still be involved by other mechanisms of inactivation; however, it is clear that other melanoma genes remain to be discovered. Family, case-control, twin and sib-pair analyses as well as DNA chip technology may shed some light on genes involved in melanocytic differentiation and skin pigmentation. Recent public health campaigns have not been very successful in changing behaviour regarding tanning, and the relationship between sun exposure and melanoma is very complex. With the understanding of genetic alterations leading to this tumour, follow-up strategies and behavioural interventions may be more specifically designed to target high risk groups.