Prevalence and specificity of LKB1 genetic alterations in lung cancers

TET2-STAT3-CXCL5 nexus promotes neutrophil lipid transfer to fuel lung adeno-to-squamous transition

Phenotypic plasticity is a rising cancer hallmark, and lung adeno-to-squamous transition (AST) triggered by LKB1 inactivation is significantly associated with drug resistance. Mechanistic insights into AST are urgently needed to identify therapeutic vulnerability in LKB1-deficient lung cancer. Here, we find that ten-eleven translocation (TET)-mediated DNA demethylation is elevated during AST in KrasLSL-G12D/+; Lkb1L/L (KL) mice, and knockout of individual Tet genes reveals that Tet2 is required for squamous transition. TET2 promotes neutrophil infiltration through STAT3-mediated CXCL5 expression. Targeting the STAT3-CXCL5 nexus effectively inhibits squamous transition through reducing neutrophil infiltration. Interestingly, tumor-infiltrating neutrophils are laden with triglycerides and can transfer the lipid to tumor cells to promote cell proliferation and squamous transition. Pharmacological inhibition of macropinocytosis dramatically inhibits neutrophil-to-cancer cell lipid transfer and blocks squamous transition. These data uncover an epigenetic mechanism orchestrating phenotypic plasticity through regulating immune microenvironment and metabolic communication, and identify therapeutic strategies to inhibit AST.

The pleiotropic nature of NONO, a master regulator of essential biological pathways in cancers

NONO is a member of the Drosophila behavior/human splicing (DBHS) family of proteins. NONO is a multifunctional protein that acts as a "molecular scaffold" to carry out versatile biological activities in many aspects of gene regulation, cell proliferation, apoptosis, migration, DNA damage repair, and maintaining cellular circadian rhythm coupled to the cell cycle. Besides these physiological activities, emerging evidence strongly indicates that NONO-altered expression levels promote tumorigenesis. In addition, NONO can undergo various post-transcriptional or post-translational modifications, including alternative splicing, phosphorylation, methylation, and acetylation, whose impact on cancer remains largely to be elucidated. Overall, altered NONO expression and/or activities are a common feature in cancer. This review provides an integrated scenario of the current understanding of the molecular mechanisms and the biological processes affected by NONO in different tumor contexts, suggesting that a better elucidation of the pleiotropic functions of NONO in physiology and tumorigenesis will make it a potential therapeutic target in cancer. In this respect, due to the complex landscape of NONO activities and interactions, we highlight caveats that must be considered during experimental planning and data interpretation of NONO studies.

LKB1 Loss Correlates with STING Loss and, in Cooperation with β-Catenin Membranous Loss, Indicates Poor Prognosis in Patients with Operable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

To investigate the incidence and prognostically significant correlations and cooperations of LKB1 loss of expression in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), surgical specimens from 188 metastatic and 60 non-metastatic operable stage I-IIIA NSCLC patients were analyzed to evaluate their expression of LKB1 and pAMPK proteins in relation to various processes. The investigated factors included antitumor immunity response regulators STING and PD-L1; pro-angiogenic, EMT and cell cycle targets, as well as metastasis-related (VEGFC, PDGFRα, PDGFRβ, p53, p16, Cyclin D1, ZEB1, CD24) targets; and cell adhesion (β-catenin) molecules. The protein expression levels were evaluated via immunohistochemistry; the RNA levels of LKB1 and NEDD9 were evaluated via PCR, while KRAS exon 2 and BRAFV600E mutations were evaluated by Sanger sequencing. Overall, loss of LKB1 protein expression was observed in 21% (51/248) patients and correlated significantly with histotype (p < 0.001), KRAS mutations (p < 0.001), KC status (concomitant KRAS mutation and p16 downregulation) (p < 0.001), STING loss (p < 0.001), and high CD24 expression (p < 0.001). STING loss also correlated significantly with loss of LKB1 expression in the metastatic setting both overall (p = 0.014) and in lung adenocarcinomas (LUACs) (p = 0.005). Additionally, LKB1 loss correlated significantly with a lack of or low β-catenin membranous expression exclusively in LUACs, both independently of the metastatic status (p = 0.019) and in the metastatic setting (p = 0.007). Patients with tumors yielding LKB1 loss and concomitant nonexistent or low β-catenin membrane expression experienced significantly inferior median overall survival of 20.50 vs. 52.99 months; p < 0.001 as well as significantly greater risk of death (HR: 3.32, 95% c.i.: 1.71-6.43; p <0.001). Our findings underscore the impact of the synergy of LKB1 with STING and β-catenin in NSCLC, in prognosis.

Molecular mechanisms underlying the regulation of tumour suppressor genes in lung cancer

Tumour suppressor genes play a cardinal role in the development of a large array of human cancers, including lung cancer, which is one of the most frequently diagnosed cancers worldwide. Therefore, extensive studies have been committed to deciphering the underlying mechanisms of alterations of tumour suppressor genes in governing tumourigenesis, as well as resistance to cancer therapies. In spite of the encouraging clinical outcomes demonstrated by lung cancer patients on initial treatment, the subsequent unresponsiveness to first-line treatments manifested by virtually all the patients is inherently a contentious issue. In light of the aforementioned concerns, this review compiles the current knowledge on the molecular mechanisms of some of the tumour suppressor genes implicated in lung cancer that are either frequently mutated and/or are located on the chromosomal arms having high LOH rates (1p, 3p, 9p, 10q, 13q, and 17p). Our study identifies specific genomic loci prone to LOH, revealing a recurrent pattern in lung cancer cases. These loci, including 3p14.2 (FHIT), 9p21.3 (p16INK4a), 10q23 (PTEN), 17p13 (TP53), exhibit a higher susceptibility to LOH due to environmental factors such as exposure to DNA-damaging agents (carcinogens in cigarette smoke) and genetic factors such as chromosomal instability, genetic mutations, DNA replication errors, and genetic predisposition. Furthermore, this review summarizes the current treatment landscape and advancements for lung cancers, including the challenges and endeavours to overcome it. This review envisages inspired researchers to embark on a journey of discovery to add to the list of what was known in hopes of prompting the development of effective therapeutic strategies for lung cancer.

Carnosic Acid against Lung Cancer: Induction of Autophagy and Activation of Sestrin-2/LKB1/AMPK Signalling

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents 80% of all lung cancer cases and is characterized by low survival rates due to chemotherapy and radiation resistance. Novel treatment strategies for NSCLC are urgently needed. Liver kinase B1 (LKB1), a tumor suppressor prevalently mutated in NSCLC, activates AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) which in turn inhibits mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) and activates unc-51 like autophagy activating kinase 1 (ULK1) to promote autophagy. Sestrin-2 is a stress-induced protein that enhances LKB1-dependent activation of AMPK, functioning as a tumor suppressor in NSCLC. In previous studies, rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis) extract (RE) activated the AMPK pathway while inhibiting mTORC1 to suppress proliferation, survival, and migration, leading to the apoptosis of NSCLC cells. In the present study, we investigated the anticancer potential of carnosic acid (CA), a bioactive polyphenolic diterpene compound found in RE. The treatment of H1299 and H460 NSCLC cells with CA resulted in concentration and time-dependent inhibition of cell proliferation assessed with crystal violet staining and 3H-thymidine incorporation, and concentration-dependent inhibition of survival, assessed using a colony formation assay. Additionally, CA induced apoptosis of H1299 cells as indicated by decreased B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) levels, increased cleaved caspase-3, -7, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), Bcl-2-associated X protein (BAX) levels, and increased nuclear condensation. These antiproliferative and proapoptotic effects coincided with the upregulation of sestrin-2 and the phosphorylation/activation of LKB1 and AMPK. Downstream of AMPK signaling, CA increased levels of autophagy marker light chain 3 (LC3), an established marker of autophagy; inhibiting autophagy with 3-methyladenine (3MA) blocked the antiproliferative effect of CA. Overall, these data indicate that CA can inhibit NSCLC cell viability and that the underlying mechanism of action of CA involves the induction of autophagy through a Sestrin-2/LKB1/AMPK signaling cascade. Future experiments will use siRNA and small molecule inhibitors to better elucidate the role of these signaling molecules in the mechanism of action of CA as well as tumor xenograft models to assess the anticancer properties of CA in vivo.

Josephin domain containing 2 (JOSD2) promotes lung cancer by inhibiting LKB1 (Liver kinase B1) activity

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) ranks as one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Despite the prominence and effectiveness of kinase-target therapies in NSCLC treatment, these drugs are suitable for and beneficial to a mere ~30% of NSCLC patients. Consequently, the need for novel strategies addressing NSCLC remains pressing. Deubiquitinases (DUBs), a group of diverse enzymes with well-defined catalytic sites that are frequently overactivated in cancers and associated with tumorigenesis and regarded as promising therapeutic targets. Nevertheless, the mechanisms by which DUBs promote NSCLC remain poorly understood. Through a global analysis of the 97 DUBs' contribution to NSCLC survival possibilities using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database, we found that high expression of Josephin Domain-containing protein 2 (JOSD2) predicted the poor prognosis of patients. Depletion of JOSD2 significantly impeded NSCLC growth in both cell/patient-derived xenografts in vivo. Mechanically, we found that JOSD2 restricts the kinase activity of LKB1, an important tumor suppressor generally inactivated in NSCLC, by removing K6-linked polyubiquitination, an action vital for maintaining the integrity of the LKB1-STRAD-MO25 complex. Notably, we identified the first small-molecule inhibitor of JOSD2, and observed that its pharmacological inhibition significantly arrested NSCLC proliferation in vitro/in vivo. Our findings highlight the vital role of JOSD2 in hindering LKB1 activity, underscoring the therapeutic potential of targeting JOSD2 in NSCLC, especially in those with inactivated LKB1, and presenting its inhibitors as a promising strategy for NSCLC treatment.

Comparative bioinformatic analysis of KRAS, STK11 and KEAP1 (co-)mutations in non-small cell lung cancer with a special focus on KRAS G12C

OBJECTIVES

Mutations in STK11 (STK11MUT) and KEAP1 (KEAP1MUT) occur frequently in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and are often co-mutated with KRAS. Several studies linked the co-occurrence of KRASMUT + STK11MUT, as well as KRASMUT + KEAP1MUT to reduced response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and even a negative impact on survival. Data focusing STK11 + KEAP1 co-mutations or the triple mutation (KRAS + STK11 + KEAP1) are scarce. The recent availability of KRAS-G12C inhibitors increases the clinical relevance of those co-mutations in KRAS-mutated NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We present a comprehensive bioinformatic analysis encompassing six datasets retrieved from cBioPortal.

RESULTS

Independent of the treatment, triple mutations and STK11MUT + KEAP1MUT were significantly associated with a reduced overall survival (OS). Across treatments, OS of patients with a KRAS G12C triple mutation was significantly reduced compared to patients with KRAS G12C-only. Under ICI-therapy, there was no significant difference in OS between patients harboring the KRAS G12C-only and patients with the KRAS G12C triple mutation, but a significant difference between patients harboring KRAS non-G12C and KRAS non-G12C triple mutations. Triple mutated primary tumors showed a significantly increased frequency of distant metastases to bone and adrenal glands compared to KRAS-only mutated tumors. Additionally, our drug response analysis in cancer cell lines harboring the triple mutations revealed the WNT pathway inhibitor XAV-939 as a potential future drug candidate for this mutational situation.

CONCLUSION

The triple mutation status may serve as a negative prognostic and predictive factor across treatments compared to KRASMUT-only. KRAS G12C generally seems to be a negative predictive marker for ICI-therapy.

AMPK targets a proto-oncogene TPD52 (isoform 3) expression and its interaction with LKB1 suppress AMPK-GSK3β signaling axis in prostate cancer

Tumor protein D52 (TPD52) is a proto-oncogene overexpressed in prostate cancer (PCa) due to gene amplification and it is involved in the cancer progression of many cancers including PCa. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the role of TPD52 in cancer progression are still under investigation. In this study, we report that the activation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) by AICAR (5-Aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleotide) inhibited the LNCaP and VCaP cells growth by silencing TPD52 expression. Activation of AMPK inhibited the proliferation and migration of LNCaP and VCaP cells. Interestingly, AICAR treatment to LNCaP and VCaP cells led to the downregulation of TPD52 via activation of GSK3β by a decrease of inactive phosphorylation at Ser9. Moreover, in AICAR treated LNCaP cells, inhibition of GSK3β by LiCl attenuated downregulation of TPD52 indicating that AICAR acts via GSK3β. Furthermore, we found that TPD52 interacts with serine/threonine kinase 11 or Liver kinase B1 (LKB1) a known tumor suppressor and an upstream kinase for AMPK. The molecular modeling and MD simulations indicates that the interaction between TPD52 and LKB1 leads to inhibition of the kinase activity of LKB1 as its auto-phosphorylation sites were masked in the complex. Consequently, TPD52-LKB1 interaction may lead to inactivation of AMPK. Moreover, overexpression of TPD52 is found to be responsible for the reduction of pLKB1 (Ser428) and pAMPK (Thr172). Therefore, TPD52 may be playing its oncogenic role via suppressing the AMPK activation. Altogether, our results revealed a new mechanism of PCa progression in which TPD52 overexpression inhibits AMPK activation by interacting with LKB1. These results support that the use of AMPK activators and/or small molecules that could disrupt the TPD52-LKB1 interaction might be useful to suppress PCa cell growth. TPD52 interacts LKB1 and interfere with activation of AMPK in PCa cells.

Evaluating the iron chelator function of sirtinol in non-small cell lung cancer

A distinctive feature of cancer is the upregulation of sirtuin proteins. Sirtuins are class III NAD+-dependent deacetylases involved in cellular processes such as proliferation and protection against oxidative stress. SIRTs 1 and 2 are also overexpressed in several types of cancers including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Sirtinol, a sirtuin (SIRT) 1 and 2 specific inhibitor, is a recent anti-cancer agent that is cytotoxic against several types of cancers including NSCLC. Thus, sirtuins 1 and 2 represent valuable targets for cancer therapy. Recent studies show that sirtinol functions as a tridentate iron chelator by binding Fe3+ with 3:1 stoichiometry. However, the biological consequences of this function remain unexplored. Consistent with preliminary literature, we show that sirtinol can deplete intracellular labile iron pools in both A549 and H1299 non-small cell lung cancer cells acutely. Interestingly, a temporal adaptive response occurs in A549 cells as sirtinol enhances transferrin receptor stability and represses ferritin heavy chain translation through impaired aconitase activity and apparent IRP1 activation. This effect was not observed in H1299 cells. Holo-transferrin supplementation significantly enhanced colony formation in A549 cells while increasing sirtinol toxicity. This effect was not observed in H1299 cells. The results highlight the fundamental genetic differences that may exist between H1299 and A549 cells and offer a novel mechanism of how sirtinol kills NSCLC cells.

Opportunities and Challenges of Kava in Lung Cancer Prevention

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths due to its high incidence, late diagnosis, and limited success in clinical treatment. Prevention therefore is critical to help improve lung cancer management. Although tobacco control and tobacco cessation are effective strategies for lung cancer prevention, the numbers of current and former smokers in the USA and globally are not expected to decrease significantly in the near future. Chemoprevention and interception are needed to help high-risk individuals reduce their lung cancer risk or delay lung cancer development. This article will review the epidemiological data, pre-clinical animal data, and limited clinical data that support the potential of kava in reducing human lung cancer risk via its holistic polypharmacological effects. To facilitate its future clinical translation, advanced knowledge is needed with respect to its mechanisms of action and the development of mechanism-based non-invasive biomarkers in addition to safety and efficacy in more clinically relevant animal models.

Phe354Leu polymorphism of the liver kinase B1 gene as a prognostic factor in adult egyptian patients with acute myeloid leukemia

Background

The human liver kinase B1 (LKB1) gene is a significant tumor suppressor widely expressed in all fetal and adult tissues. Despite its established role in solid tumors, the biological and clinical implications of LKB1 gene alterations in hematological malignancies have not been sufficiently recognized.

Aim

This study aimed to determine the frequency of the LKB1 Phe354Leu polymorphism in adult Egyptian patients with cytogenetically normal AML (CN-AML), evaluate its clinical prognostic significance, and investigate its effect on the therapeutic outcome and patient survival.

Methods

Direct sequencing of amplified exon eight of the LKB1 gene was performed to detect the Phe354Leu polymorphism in 72 adult de novo CN-AML patients.

Results

The LKB1 Phe354Leu polymorphism was detected in 16.7% of patients and associated with younger age and lower hemoglobin levels (p < 0.001). Patients in the mutated group had significantly higher total leukocytic count and bone marrow blasts (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). The most common FAB subtypes in mutated patients were M4 and M2. The relapse rate was significantly higher in the mutated group (p = 0.004). There was a significant association between the FLT3-ITD polymorphism and LKB1 F354L (p < 0.001). The mutated group had shorter overall survival (p = 0.003). In multivariate analysis, the Phe354Leu polymorphism was a significant independent prognostic variable for the overall and disease-free survival of the studied patients (p = 0.049).

Conclusion

The LKB1 Phe354Leu polymorphism was diagnosed at younger ages in Egyptian CN-AML patients and represented a poor independent prognostic factor in CN-AML. Patients who carried this polymorphism had shorter overall survival and more frequent relapses. Our findings may provide insight into the design of therapeutic targets, and molecular testing of the LKB1 gene is recommended for proper risk stratification of CN-AML patients.

Posttranslational regulation of liver kinase B1 (LKB1) in human cancer

Liver kinase B1 (LKB1) is a serine-threonine kinase that participates in multiple cellular and biological processes, including energy metabolism, cell polarity, cell proliferation, cell migration, and many others. LKB1 is initially identified as a germline-mutated causative gene in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS) and is commonly regarded as a tumor suppressor due to frequent inactivation in a variety of cancers. LKB1 directly binds and activates its downstream kinases including the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and AMPK-related kinases by phosphorylation, which has been intensively investigated for the past decades. An increasing number of studies has uncovered the posttranslational modifications (PTMs) of LKB1 and consequent changes in its localization, activity, and interaction with substrates. The alteration in LKB1 function as a consequence of genetic mutations and aberrant upstream signaling regulation leads to tumor development and progression. Here, we review current knowledge about the mechanism of LKB1 in cancer and the contributions of PTMs, such as phosphorylation, ubiquitination, SUMOylation, acetylation, prenylation, and others, to the regulation of LKB1 function, offering new insights into the therapeutic strategies in cancer.

Oxidative stress-triggered Wnt signaling perturbation characterizes the tipping point of lung adeno-to-squamous transdifferentiation

Lkb1 deficiency confers the Kras-mutant lung cancer with strong plasticity and the potential for adeno-to-squamous transdifferentiation (AST). However, it remains largely unknown how Lkb1 deficiency dynamically regulates AST. Using the classical AST mouse model (Kras ^LSL-G12D/+;Lkb1^flox/flox, KL), we here comprehensively analyze the temporal transcriptomic dynamics of lung tumors at different stages by dynamic network biomarker (DNB) and identify the tipping point at which the Wnt signaling is abruptly suppressed by the excessive accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) through its downstream effector FOXO3A. Bidirectional genetic perturbation of the Wnt pathway using two different Ctnnb1 conditional knockout mouse strains confirms its essential role in the negative regulation of AST. Importantly, pharmacological activation of the Wnt pathway before but not after the tipping point inhibits squamous transdifferentiation, highlighting the irreversibility of AST after crossing the tipping point. Through comparative transcriptomic analyses of mouse and human tumors, we find that the lineage-specific transcription factors (TFs) of adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma form a "Yin-Yang" counteracting network. Interestingly, inactivation of the Wnt pathway preferentially suppresses the adenomatous lineage TF network and thus disrupts the "Yin-Yang" homeostasis to lean towards the squamous lineage, whereas ectopic expression of NKX2-1, an adenomatous lineage TF, significantly dampens such phenotypic transition accelerated by the Wnt pathway inactivation. The negative correlation between the Wnt pathway and AST is further observed in a large cohort of human lung adenosquamous carcinoma. Collectively, our study identifies the tipping point of AST and highlights an essential role of the ROS-Wnt axis in dynamically orchestrating the homeostasis between adeno- and squamous-specific TF networks at the AST tipping point.

Emerging Biomarkers in Immune Oncology to Guide Lung Cancer Management

Over the last decade, the use of targeted therapies and immune therapies led to drastic changes in the management lung cancer and translated to improved survival outcomes. This growing arsenal of therapies available for the management of non-small cell lung cancer added more complexity to treatment decisions. The genomic profiling of tumors and the molecular characterization of the tumor microenvironment gradually became essential steps in exploring and identifying markers that can enhance patient selection to facilitate treatment personalization and narrow down therapy options. The advent of innovative diagnostic platforms, such as next-generation sequencing and plasma genotyping (also known as liquid biopsies), has aided in this quest. Currently, programmed cell death ligand 1 expression remains the most recognized and fully validated predictive biomarker of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Other markers such as tumor mutational burden, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, driver mutations, and other molecular elements of the tumor microenvironment bear the potential to be predictive tools; however, the majority are still investigational. In this review, we describe the advances noted thus far on currently validated as well as novel emerging biomarkers that have the potential to guide the use of immunotherapy agents in the management of non-small cell lung cancer.

LKB1 phosphorylation and deactivation in lung cancer by NNAL, a metabolite of tobacco-specific carcinogen, in an isomer-dependent manner

LKB1 loss of function is one key oncogenic event in lung cancer. Clinical data suggest that LKB1 loss of function is associated with patients' smoking status. The responsible ingredients and molecular mechanisms in tobacco for LKB1 loss of function, however, are not defined. In this study, we reported that NNAL, a major metabolite of a tobacco-specific carcinogen NNK, induces LKB1 phosphorylation and its loss of function via the β-AR/PKA signaling pathway in an isomer-dependent manner in human lung cancer cells. NNAL exposure also resulted in enhanced lung cancer cell migration and chemoresistance in an LKB1-dependent manner. A 120-day NNAL exposure in lung cancer cells, mimicking its chronic exposure among smokers, resulted in more prominent LKB1 phosphorylation, cell migration, and chemoresistance even in the absence of NNAL, indicating the long-lasting LKB1 loss of function although such an effect eventually disappeared after NNAL was removed for two months. These observations were confirmed in a lung cancer xenograft model. More importantly, human lung cancer tissues revealed elevated LKB1 phosphorylation in comparison to the paired normal lung tissues. These results suggest that LKB1 loss of function in human lung cancer could be extended to its phosphorylation, which may be mediated by NNAL from tobacco smoke in an isomer-dependent manner via the β-AR/PKA signaling pathway.

Loss of function STK11 alterations and poor outcomes in non-small-cell lung cancer: Literature and case series of US Veterans

Emerging evidence suggests that STK11 alterations, frequently found in non-small-cell lung cancers, may be prognostic and/or predictive of response to therapy, particularly immunotherapy. STK11 affects multiple important cellular pathways, and mutations lead to tumor growth by creating an immunosuppressive and altered metabolic environment through changes in AMPK, STING, and vascular endothelial growth factor pathways. We illustrate the questions surrounding STK11 genomic alteration in NSCLC with a case series comprising six United States Veterans from a single institution. We discuss the history of STK11, review studies on its clinical impact, and describe putative mechanisms of how loss of STK11 might engender resistance to immunotherapy or other therapies. While the exact impact of STK11 alteration in non-small-cell lung cancer remain to be fully elucidated, future research and ongoing clinical trials will help us better understand its role in cancer development and devise more effective treatment strategies.

Clinical impact of STK11 mutation in advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Mutations in STK11/LKB1 gene present a negative impact on tumour immune microenvironment, especially with concomitant activating KRAS mutation. These recent data may explain a decreased response to immunotherapy treatment in STK11 mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective is to evaluate, in a real-life setting, overall survival (OS) in patients with NSCLC according to the presence of STK11 mutation. The secondary objective is to assess time to treatment failure (TTF) for the first-line chemotherapy or immunotherapy.

METHODS

This observational multicentric study was conducted in Nouvelle-Aquitaine (France), for 24 months. Clinical, histopathological and imagery data were collected in each centre while the next-generation sequencing analysis was performed in Bordeaux Hospital University. Patient's data were longitudinally followed from NSCLC diagnosis date to the occurrence of censoring events (therapeutic failure or death, as applicable) or until the study end date.

RESULTS

median OS from the first drug administration was significantly longer for STK11^wt patients than STK11^mut patients (16.2 months [11 - nr] versus 4.7 months [2.5-9.4]; Log-rank test P < 0.001). The Presence of STK11 mutation was significantly associated with shortened OS (RR = 2.26 [1.35-3.79], P = 0.002). First-line TTF was significantly shorter in STK11^mut population and the presence of the mutation was significantly associated with an increase in treatment failures (RR = 1.87 [1.21-2.89], P = 0.005). The type of treatment (chemotherapy, immunotherapy) does not influence the amplitude of reduced TTF in patients with STK11^mut.

CONCLUSION

The presence of STK11 mutation is associated with poor prognosis in NSCLC.

LKB1: Can We Target an Hidden Target? Focus on NSCLC

LKB1 (liver kinase B1) is a master regulator of several processes such as metabolism, proliferation, cell polarity and immunity. About one third of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) present LKB1 alterations, which almost invariably lead to protein loss, resulting in the absence of a potential druggable target. In addition, LKB1-null tumors are very aggressive and resistant to chemotherapy, targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). In this review, we report and comment strategies that exploit peculiar co-vulnerabilities to effectively treat this subgroup of NSCLCs. LKB1 loss leads to an enhanced metabolic avidity, and treatments inducing metabolic stress were successful in inhibiting tumor growth in several preclinical models. Biguanides, by compromising mitochondria and reducing systemic glucose availability, and the glutaminase inhibitor telaglenastat (CB-839), inhibiting glutamate production and reducing carbon intermediates essential for TCA cycle progression, have provided the most interesting results and entered different clinical trials enrolling also LKB1-null NSCLC patients. Nutrient deprivation has been investigated as an alternative therapeutic intervention, giving rise to interesting results exploitable to design specific dietetic regimens able to counteract cancer progression. Other strategies aimed at targeting LKB1-null NSCLCs exploit its pivotal role in modulating cell proliferation and cell invasion. Several inhibitors of LKB1 downstream proteins, such as mTOR, MEK, ERK and SRK/FAK, resulted specifically active on LKB1-mutated preclinical models and, being molecules already in clinical experimentation, could be soon proposed as a specific therapy for these patients. In particular, the rational use in combination of these inhibitors represents a very promising strategy to prevent the activation of collateral pathways and possibly avoid the potential emergence of resistance to these drugs. LKB1-null phenotype has been correlated to ICIs resistance but several studies have already proposed the mechanisms involved and potential interventions. Interestingly, emerging data highlighted that LKB1 alterations represent positive determinants to the new KRAS specific inhibitors response in KRAS co-mutated NSCLCs. In conclusion, the absence of the target did not block the development of treatments able to hit LKB1-mutated NSCLCs acting on several fronts. This will give patients a concrete chance to finally benefit from an effective therapy.

LKB1 Is Physiologically Required for Sleep from Drosophila melanogaster to the Mus musculus

Liver Kinase B1 (LKB1) is known as a master kinase for 14 kinases related to the adenosine monophosphate (AMP)-activated protein kinase (AMPK). Two of them salt inducible kinase 3 (SIK3) and AMPKα have previously been implicated in sleep regulation. We generated loss-of-function (LOF) mutants for Lkb1 in both Drosophila and mice. Sleep, but not circadian rhythms, was reduced in Lkb1-mutant flies and in flies with neuronal deletion of Lkb1. Genetic interactions between Lkb1 and Threonine to Alanine mutation at residue 184 of AMPK in Drosophila sleep or those between Lkb1 and Threonine to Glutamic Acid mutation at residue 196 of SIK3 in Drosophila viability have been observed. Sleep was reduced in mice after virally mediated reduction of Lkb1 in the brain. Electroencephalography (EEG) analysis showed that non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep and sleep need were both reduced in Lkb1-mutant mice. These results indicate that LKB1 plays a physiological role in sleep regulation conserved from flies to mice.

Histologic and Genotypic Characterization of Lung Cancer in the Inuit Population of the Eastern Canadian Arctic

Inuit are the Indigenous Arctic peoples and residents of the Canadian territory of Nunavut who have the highest global rate of lung cancer. Given lung cancer’s mortality, histological and genomic characterization was undertaken to better understand the disease biology. We retrospectively studied all Inuit cases from Nunavut’s Qikiqtani (Baffin) region, referred to the Ottawa Hospital Cancer Center between 2001 and 2011. Demographics were compiled from medical records and tumor samples underwent pathologic/histologic confirmation. Tumors were analyzed by next generation sequencing (NGS) with a cancer hotspot mutation panel. Of 98 patients, the median age was 66 years and 61% were male. Tobacco use was reported in 87%, and 69% had a history of lung disease (tuberculosis or other). Histological types were: non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), 81%; small cell lung carcinoma, 16%. Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) represented 65% of NSCLC. NGS on 55 samples demonstrated mutation rates similar to public lung cancer datasets. In SCC, the STK11 F354L mutation was observed at higher frequency than previously reported. This is the first study to characterize the histologic/genomic profiles of lung cancer in this population. A high incidence of SCC, and an elevated rate of STK11 mutations distinguishes this group from the North American population.

EMT, Stemness, and Drug Resistance in Biological Context: A 3D Tumor Tissue/In Silico Platform for Analysis of Combinatorial Treatment in NSCLC with Aggressive KRAS-Biomarker Signatures

Simple Summary

The phenotypic transition of tumor cells from epithelial to mesenchymal characteristics is called EMT and is widely discussed in the scientific community as a game changer in drug resistance and metastasis formation. However, clinical studies could not prove the efficacy of EMT-interfering treatments, and in clinical routine, EMT is not investigated to assess invasion. To fill this gap between bench and bedside, we use in this study a lung tumor tissue model with a preserved basement membrane for investigation of EMT functions with respect to invasion across this membrane and drug resistance. Our results suggest EMT is more a marker of drug resistance than a maker. Invasion is enhanced by EMT but more dependent on intrinsic factors, and EMT is not detected in the center of invasive tumor nodules. An in silico signaling network model is used to integrate these in vitro results and to reveal determinants for drug response.

Abstract

Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is discussed to be centrally involved in invasion, stemness, and drug resistance. Experimental models to evaluate this process in its biological complexity are limited. To shed light on EMT impact and test drug response more reliably, we use a lung tumor test system based on a decellularized intestinal matrix showing more in vivo-like proliferation levels and enhanced expression of clinical markers and carcinogenesis-related genes. In our models, we found evidence for a correlation of EMT with drug resistance in primary and secondary resistant cells harboring KRAS^G12C or EGFR mutations, which was simulated in silico based on an optimized signaling network topology. Notably, drug resistance did not correlate with EMT status in KRAS-mutated patient-derived xenograft (PDX) cell lines, and drug efficacy was not affected by EMT induction via TGF-β. To investigate further determinants of drug response, we tested several drugs in combination with a KRAS^G12C inhibitor in KRAS^G12C mutant HCC44 models, which, besides EMT, display mutations in P53, LKB1, KEAP1, and high c-MYC expression. We identified an aurora-kinase A (AURKA) inhibitor as the most promising candidate. In our network, AURKA is a centrally linked hub to EMT, proliferation, apoptosis, LKB1, and c-MYC. This exemplifies our systemic analysis approach for clinical translation of biomarker signatures.

Role of STK11 in ALK‑positive non‑small cell lung cancer (Review)

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors have been shown to be effective in treating patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and crizotinib, ceritinib and alectinib have been approved as clinical first-line therapeutic agents. The availability of these inhibitors has also largely changed the treatment strategy for advanced ALK-positive NSCLC. However, patients still inevitably develop resistance to ALK inhibitors, leading to tumor recurrence or metastasis. The most critical issues that need to be addressed in the current treatment of ALK-positive NSCLC include the high cost of targeted inhibitors and the potential for increased toxicity and resistance to combination therapy. Recently, it has been suggested that the serine/threonine kinase 11 (STK11) mutation may serve as one of the biomarkers for immunotherapy in NSCLC. Therefore, the main purpose of this review was to summarize the role of STK11 in ALK-positive NSCLC. The present review also summarizes the treatment and drug resistance studies in ALK-positive NSCLC and the current status of STK11 research in NSCLC.

RNA demethylase ALKBH5 in cancer: from mechanisms to therapeutic potential

RNA demethylase ALKBH5 takes part in the modulation of N⁶-methyladenosine (m⁶A) modification and controls various cell processes. ALKBH5-mediated m⁶A demethylation regulates gene expression by affecting multiple events in RNA metabolism, e.g., pre-mRNA processing, mRNA decay and translation. Mounting evidence shows that ALKBH5 plays critical roles in a variety of human malignancies, mostly via post-transcriptional regulation of oncogenes or tumor suppressors in an m⁶A-dependent manner. Meanwhile, increasing non-coding RNAs are recognized as functional targets of ALKBH5 in cancers. Here we reviewed up-to-date findings about the pathological roles of ALKBH5 in cancer, the molecular mechanisms by which it exerts its functions, as well as the underlying mechanism of its dysregulation. We also discussed the therapeutic implications of targeting ALKBH5 in cancer and potential ALKBH5-targeting strategies.

Integrated genomic and DNA methylation analysis of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer with brain metastases

BACKGROUND

Brain metastasis is a common and lethal complication of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It is mostly diagnosed only after symptoms develop, at which point very few treatment options are available. Therefore, patients who have an increased risk of developing brain metastasis need to be identified early. Our study aimed to identify genomic and epigenomic biomarkers for predicting brain metastasis risk in NSCLC patients.

METHODS

Paired primary lung tumor tissues and either brain metastatic tissues or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were collected from 29 patients with treatment-naïve advanced NSCLC with central nervous system (CNS) metastases. A control group comprising 31 patients with advanced NSCLC who died without ever developing CNS metastasis was also included. Somatic mutations and DNA methylation levels were examined through capture-based targeted sequencing with a 520-gene panel and targeted bisulfite sequencing with an 80,672 CpG panel.

RESULTS

Compared to primary lung lesions, brain metastatic tissues harbored numerous unique copy number variations. The tumor mutational burden was comparable between brain metastatic tissue (P = 0.168)/CSF (P = 0.445) and their paired primary lung tumor samples. Kelch-like ECH-associated protein (KEAP1) mutations were detected in primary lung tumor and brain metastatic tissue samples of patients with brain metastasis. KEAP1 mutation rate was significantly higher in patients with brain metastasis than those without (P = 0.031). DNA methylation analysis revealed 15 differentially methylated blocks between primary lung tumors of patients with and without CNS metastasis. A brain metastasis risk prediction model based on these 15 differentially methylated blocks had an area under the curve of 0.94, with 87.1% sensitivity and 82.8% specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analyses revealed 15 differentially methylated blocks in primary lung tumor tissues, which can differentiate patients with and without CNS metastasis. These differentially methylated blocks may serve as predictive biomarkers for the risk of developing CNS metastasis in NSCLC. Additional larger studies are needed to validate the predictive value of these markers.

Targeting mutated GTPase KRAS in tumor therapies

Kirsten rat sarcoma virus oncogene (KRAS) mutation accounts for approximately 85% of RAS-driven cancers, and participates in multiple signaling pathways and mediates cell proliferation, differentiation and metabolism. KRAS has been considered as an "undruggable" target due to the lack of effective direct inhibitors, although high frequency of KRAS mutations have been identified in multiple carcinomas in the past decades. Encouragingly, the KRAS^G12C inhibitor AMG510 (sotorasib), which has been approved for treating NSCLC and CRC recently, makes directly targeting KRAS the most promising strategy for cancer therapy. To better understand the current state of KRAS inhibitors, this review summarizes the biological functions of KRAS, the structure-activity relationship studies of the small-molecule inhibitors that directly target KRAS, and highlights the therapeutic agents with improved selectivity, bioavailability and physicochemical properties. Furthermore, the combined medication that can enhance efficacy and overcome drug resistance of KRAS covalent inhibitors is also reviewed.

Enhanced Vulnerability of LKB1-Deficient NSCLC to Disruption of ATP Pools and Redox Homeostasis by 8-Cl-Ado

Loss-of-function somatic mutations of STK11, a tumor suppressor gene encoding LKB1 that contributes to the altered metabolic phenotype of cancer cells, is the second most common event in lung adenocarcinomas and often co-occurs with activating KRAS mutations. Tumor cells lacking LKB1 display an aggressive phenotype, with uncontrolled cell growth and higher energetic and redox stress due to its failure to balance ATP and NADPH levels in response to cellular stimulus. The identification of effective therapeutic regimens for patients with LKB1-deficient non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a major clinical need. Here, we report that LKB1-deficient NSCLC tumor cells displayed reduced basal levels of ATP and to a lesser extent other nucleotides, and markedly enhanced sensitivity to 8-Cl-adenosine (8-Cl-Ado), an energy-depleting nucleoside analog. Treatment with 8-Cl-Ado depleted intracellular ATP levels, raised redox stress, and induced cell death leading to a compensatory suppression of mTOR signaling in LKB1-intact, but not LKB1-deficient, cells. Proteomic analysis revealed that the MAPK/MEK/ERK and PI3K/AKT pathways were activated in response to 8-Cl-Ado treatment and targeting these pathways enhanced the antitumor efficacy of 8-Cl-Ado. IMPLICATIONS: Together, our findings demonstrate that LKB1-deficient tumor cells are selectively sensitive to 8-Cl-Ado and suggest that therapeutic approaches targeting vulnerable energy stores combined with signaling pathway inhibitors merit further investigation for this patient population.

Modulating Tumor Microenvironment: A Review on STK11 Immune Properties and Predictive vs Prognostic Role for Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Immunotherapy

OPINION STATEMENT

The quest for immunotherapy (IT) biomarkers is an element of highest clinical interest in both solid and hematologic tumors. In non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, besides PD-L1 expression evaluation with its intrinsic limitations, tissue and circulating parameters, likely portraying the tumor and its stromal/immune counterparts, have been proposed as potential predictors of IT responsiveness. STK11 mutations have been globally labeled as markers of IT resistance. After a thorough literature review, STK11 mutations condition the prognosis of NSCLC patients receiving ICI-containing regimens, implying a relevant biological and clinical significance. On the other hand, waiting for prospective and solid data, the putative negative predictive value of STK11 inactivation towards IT is sustained by less evidence. The physiologic regulation of multiple cellular pathways performed by STK11 likely explains the multifaceted modifications in tumor cells, stroma, and tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) observed in STK11 mutant lung cancer, particularly explored in the molecular subgroup of KRAS co-mutation. IT approaches available thus far in NSCLC, mainly represented by anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, are not promising in the case of STK11 inactivation. Perceptive strategies aimed at modulating the TIME, regardless of STK11 status or specifically addressed to STK11-mutated cases, will hopefully provide valid therapeutic options to be adopted in the clinical practice.

STK11/LKB1 and KEAP1 mutations in non-small cell lung cancer: Prognostic rather than predictive?

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), either alone or combined with chemotherapy, represent the cornerstone of the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without targetable gene alterations. Programmed death ligand-1 expression currently represents the only available biomarker to predict response to ICI, although its reliability is debated. However, most patients still do not derive benefit from immunotherapy, making the identification of further predictive biomarkers extremely needed. Serine/threonine kinase 11 (STK11)/liver kinase B1 (LKB1) and Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (KEAP1) mutations occur in 25-30% and 11-27% of advanced NSCLC, respectively. Several studies associated their presence with poor outcomes in patients treated with ICI. However, more recent evidence showed poor outcomes among NSCLC with STK11/LKB1 and/or KEAP1 mutations regardless of the treatment received. We reviewed the literature to provide a comprehensive, timely and structured overview of the role of STK11/LKB1 and KEAP1 mutations in NSCLC. Although conflicting outcomes have been reported by studies evaluating their impact in KRAS wild-type patients or regardless of KRAS mutation, the correlation between STK11/LKB1 and KEAP1 mutations and poor outcomes with ICI appears to be consistent in presence of concurrent KRAS mutations. The main limitations of most studies are represented by the inclusion of other gene mutations (e.g. TP53) together with STK11 and KEAP1 mutations as a group and by the lack of comparison arms including patients who received other treatments (e.g. chemotherapy). Studies evaluating the impact of STK11 and KEAP1 mutations on the outcomes with ICI and other therapies showed a similar effect regardless of the treatment received, suggesting a prognostic, rather than predictive, value.

Gene of the month: STK11

STK11 encodes for the protein liver kinase B1, a serine/threonine kinase which is involved in a number of physiological processes including regulation of cellular metabolism, cell polarity and the DNA damage response. It acts as a tumour suppressor via multiple mechanisms, most classically through AMP-activated protein kinase-mediated inhibition of the mammalian target of rapamycin signalling pathway. Germline loss-of-function mutations in STK11 give rise to Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, which is associated with hamartomatous polyps of the gastrointestinal tract, mucocutaneous pigmentation and a substantially increased lifetime risk of many cancers. In the sporadic setting, STK11 mutations are commonly seen in a subset of adenocarcinomas of the lung in addition to a number of other tumours occurring at various sites. Mutations in STK11 have been associated with worse prognoses across a range of malignancies and may be a predictor of poor response to immunotherapy in a subset of lung cancers, though further studies are needed before the presence of STK11 mutations can be implemented as a routine clinical biomarker.

New Scope of Targeted Therapies in Lung Carcinoma

Lung cancer (LC) is the leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Recent research has also shown LC as a genomic disease, causing somatic mutations in patients. Tests related to mutational analysis and genome profiles have lately expanded significantly in the genetics/genomics field of LC. This review summarizes the current knowledge about different signalling pathways of LC based on the clinical impact of molecular targets. It describes the main molecular pathways and changes involved in the development, progression, and cellular breakdown of LC and the molecular changes. This review focuses on approved and targeted experimental therapies such as immunotherapy and clinical trials that examine the different targeted approaches to treating LC. We aimto clarify the differences in the extent of various genetic mutations in several areas for LC patients. Targeted molecular therapies for LC can be continued with advanced racial differences in genetic changes, which have a significant impact on the choice of drug treatment and our understanding of the profile of drug susceptibility/resistance. The most relevant genes described in this review are EGFR, KRAS, MET, BRAF, PIK3CA, STK11, ERBB3, PTEN, and RB1. Combined research efforts in this field are required to understand the genetic difference in LC outcomes in the future.

PIM kinases inhibit AMPK activation and promote tumorigenicity by phosphorylating LKB1

BACKGROUND

The oncogenic PIM kinases and the tumor-suppressive LKB1 kinase have both been implicated in the regulation of cell growth and metabolism, albeit in opposite directions. Here we investigated whether these kinases interact with each other to influence AMPK activation and tumorigenic growth of prostate and breast cancer cells.

METHODS

We first determined how PIM and LKB1 kinases affect AMPK phosphorylation levels. We then used in vitro kinase assays to demonstrate that LKB1 is phosphorylated by PIM kinases, and site-directed mutagenesis to identify the PIM target sites in LKB1. The cellular functions of PIM and LKB1 kinases were evaluated using either pan-PIM inhibitors or CRISPR/Cas9 genomic editing, with which all three PIM family members and/or LKB1 were knocked out from PC3 prostate and MCF7 breast cancer cell lines. In addition to cell proliferation assays, we examined the effects of PIM and/or LKB1 loss on tumor growth using the chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) xenograft model.

RESULTS

We provide both genetic and pharmacological evidence to demonstrate that inhibition of PIM expression or activity increases phosphorylation of AMPK at Thr172 in both PC3 and MCF7 cells, but not in their derivatives lacking LKB1. This is explained by our observation that all three PIM family kinases can phosphorylate LKB1 at Ser334. Wild-type LKB1, but not its phosphodeficient derivative, can restore PIM inhibitor-induced AMPK phosphorylation in LKB1 knock-out cells. In the CAM model, loss of LKB1 enhances tumorigenicity of PC3 xenografts, while cells lacking both LKB1 and PIMs exhibit slower proliferation rates and form smaller tumors.

CONCLUSION

PIM kinases are novel negative regulators of LKB1 that affect AMPK activity in an LKB1-dependent fashion. The impairment of cell proliferation and tumor growth in cells lacking both LKB1 and PIMs indicates that these kinases possess a shared signaling role in the context of cancer. These data also suggest that PIM inhibitors may be a rational therapeutic option for LKB1-deficient tumors. Video Abstract.

Dependency of human and murine LKB1-inactivated lung cancer on aberrant CRTC-CREB activation

Lung cancer with loss-of-function of the LKB1 tumor suppressor is a common aggressive subgroup with no effective therapies. LKB1-deficiency induces constitutive activation of cAMP/CREB-mediated transcription by a family of three CREB-regulated transcription coactivators (CRTC1-3). However, the significance and mechanism of CRTC activation in promoting the aggressive phenotype of LKB1-null cancer remain poorly characterized. Here, we observed overlapping CRTC expression patterns and mild growth phenotypes of individual CRTC-knockouts in lung cancer, suggesting functional redundancy of CRTC1-3. We consequently designed a dominant-negative mutant (dnCRTC) to block all three CRTCs to bind and co-activate CREB. Expression of dnCRTC efficiently inhibited the aberrantly activated cAMP/CREB-mediated oncogenic transcriptional program induced by LKB1-deficiency, and specifically blocked the growth of human and murine LKB1-inactivated lung cancer. Collectively, this study provides direct proof for an essential role of the CRTC-CREB activation in promoting the malignant phenotypes of LKB1-null lung cancer and proposes the CRTC-CREB interaction interface as a novel therapeutic target.

Serine threonine kinase 11/liver kinase B1 mutation in sporadic scirrhous-type gastric cancer cells

Scirrhous-type gastric carcinoma (SGC), which is characterized by the rapid proliferation of cancer cells accompanied by extensive fibrosis, shows extremely poor survival. A reason for the poor prognosis of SGC is that the driver gene responsible for SGC has not been identified. To identify the characteristic driver gene of SGC, we examined the genomic landscape of six human SGC cell lines of OCUM-1, OCUM-2M, OCUM-8, OCUM-9, OCUM-12 and OCUM-14, using multiplex gene panel testing by next-generation sequencing. In this study, the non-synonymous mutations of serine threonine kinase 11/liver kinase B1 (STK11/LKB1) gene were detected in OCUM-12, OCUM-2M and OCUM-14 among the six SGC cell lines. Capillary sequencing analysis confirmed the non-sense or missense mutation of STK11/LKB1 in the three cell lines. Western blot analysis showed that LKB1 expression was decreased in OCUM-12 cells and OCUM-14 cells harboring STK11/LKB1 mutation. The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor significantly inhibited the proliferation of OCUM-12 and OCUM-14 cells. The correlations between STK11/LKB1 expression and clinicopathologic features of gastric cancer were examined using 708 primary gastric carcinomas by immunochemical study. The low STK11/LKB1 expression group was significantly associated with SGC, high invasion depth and frequent nodal involvement, in compared with the high STK11/LKB1 expression group. Collectively, our study demonstrated that STK11/LKB1 mutation might be responsible for the progression of SGC, and suggested that mTOR signaling by STK11/LKB1 mutation might be one of therapeutic targets for patients with SGC.

Suppression of m6A mRNA modification by DNA hypermethylated ALKBH5 aggravates the oncological behavior of KRAS mutation/LKB1 loss lung cancer

Oncogenic KRAS mutations combined with the loss of the LKB1 tumor-suppressor gene (KL) are strongly associated with aggressive forms of lung cancer. N6-methyladenosine (m6A) in mRNA is a crucial epigenetic modification that controls cancer self-renewal and progression. However, the regulation and role of m6A modification in this cancer are unclear. We found that decreased m6A levels correlated with the disease progression and poor survival for KL patients. The correlation was mediated by a special increase in ALKBH5 (AlkB family member 5) levels, an m6A demethylase. ALKBH5 gain- or loss-of function could effectively reverse LKB1 regulated cell proliferation, colony formation, and migration of KRAS-mutated lung cancer cells. Mechanistically, LKB1 loss upregulated ALKBH5 expression by DNA hypermethylation of the CTCF-binding motif on the ALKBH5 promoter, which inhibited CTCF binding but enhanced histone modifications, including H3K4me3, H3K9ac, and H3K27ac. This effect could successfully be rescued by LKB1 expression. ALKBH5 demethylation of m6A stabilized oncogenic drivers, such as SOX2, SMAD7, and MYC, through a pathway dependent on YTHDF2, an m6A reader protein. The above findings were confirmed in clinical KRAS-mutated lung cancer patients. We conclude that loss of LKB1 promotes ALKBH5 transcription by a DNA methylation mechanism, reduces m6A modification, and increases the stability of m6A target oncogenes, thus contributing to aggressive phenotypes of KRAS-mutated lung cancer.

Zebrafish Cancer Predisposition Models

Cancer predisposition syndromes are rare, typically monogenic disorders that result from germline mutations that increase the likelihood of developing cancer. Although these disorders are individually rare, resulting cancers collectively represent 5-10% of all malignancies. In addition to a greater incidence of cancer, affected individuals have an earlier tumor onset and are frequently subjected to long-term multi-modal cancer screening protocols for earlier detection and initiation of treatment. In vivo models are needed to better understand tumor-driving mechanisms, tailor patient screening approaches and develop targeted therapies to improve patient care and disease prognosis. The zebrafish (Danio rerio) has emerged as a robust model for cancer research due to its high fecundity, time- and cost-efficient genetic manipulation and real-time high-resolution imaging. Tumors developing in zebrafish cancer models are histologically and molecularly similar to their human counterparts, confirming the validity of these models. The zebrafish platform supports both large-scale random mutagenesis screens to identify potential candidate/modifier genes and recently optimized genome editing strategies. These techniques have greatly increased our ability to investigate the impact of certain mutations and how these lesions impact tumorigenesis and disease phenotype. These unique characteristics position the zebrafish as a powerful in vivo tool to model cancer predisposition syndromes and as such, several have already been created, including those recapitulating Li-Fraumeni syndrome, familial adenomatous polyposis, RASopathies, inherited bone marrow failure syndromes, and several other pathogenic mutations in cancer predisposition genes. In addition, the zebrafish platform supports medium- to high-throughput preclinical drug screening to identify compounds that may represent novel treatment paradigms or even prevent cancer evolution. This review will highlight and synthesize the findings from zebrafish cancer predisposition models created to date. We will discuss emerging trends in how these zebrafish cancer models can improve our understanding of the genetic mechanisms driving cancer predisposition and their potential to discover therapeutic and/or preventative compounds that change the natural history of disease for these vulnerable children, youth and adults.

AMPKα-like proteins as LKB1 downstream targets in cell physiology and cancer

One of the key events in cancer development is the ability of tumor cells to overcome nutrient deprivation and hypoxia. Among proteins performing metabolic adaptation to the various cellular nutrient conditions, liver kinase B 1 (LKB1) and its main downstream target adenosine monophosphate (AMP)-activated protein kinase α (AMPKα) are important sensors of energy requirements within the cell. Although LKB1 was originally described as a tumor suppressor, given its role in metabolism, it potentially acts as a double-edged sword. AMPKα, a master regulator of cell energy demands, is activated when ATP level drops under a certain threshold, responding accordingly through its downstream targets. Twelve downstream kinase targets of LKB1 have been described as AMPKα-like proteins. This group is comprised of novel (nua) kinase family (NUAK) kinases (NUAK1 and 2) linked to cell cycle progression and ultraviolet (UV)-damage; microtubule affinity regulating kinases (MARKs) (MARK1, MARK2, MARK3, and MARK4) that are involved in cell polarity; salt inducible kinases (SIK) (SIK1, SIK2, also known as Qin-induced kinase or QIK and SIK3) that are implicated in cell metabolism and adipose tissue development and mitotic regulation; maternal embryonic leuzine zipper kinase (MELK) that regulate oocyte maturation; and finally brain selective kinases (BRSKs) (BRSK1 and 2), which have been mainly characterized in the brain due to their role in neuronal polarization. Thus, many efforts have been made in order to harness LKB1 kinase and its downstream targets as a possible therapeutic hub in tumor development and propagation. In this review, we describe LKB1 and its downstream target AMPK summarize major functions of various AMPK-like proteins, while focusing on biological functions of BRSK1 and 2 in different models.

Survival analysis for non-squamous NSCLC patients harbored STK11 or KEAP1 mutation receiving atezolizumab

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the prognostic effect for patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harbored STK11 or KEAP1 (STK11/KEAP1) mutations receiving atezolizumab and docetaxel.

METHODS

Data from OAK and POPLAR clinical trials was firstly applied to analyze genomic alteration frequency and the correlation between STK11/KEAP1 mutations and blood-based tumor mutational burden (bTMB)/PD-L1 expression. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression hazard models were preformed to analyze the influence of prognostic factors on survival. Survival difference was compared by Kaplan-Meier and log-rank test.

RESULTS

Most STK11/KEAP1 mutations (7.33 %/10.76 %) were found in non-squamous NSCLC compared with squamous lung cancer. Interestingly, only 1.56 % STK11 mutation or 3.13 % KEAP1 mutation occurred in EGFR mutant non-squamous NSCLC. Compared with wild type, patients with STK11/KEAP1 mutations had higher bTMB (both, P < 0.001). Moreover, compared with wild type, patients harbored KEAP1 mutation had higher PD-L1 expression (TC3/IC3: 25.00 % vs. 14.54 %), while patients harbored STK11 mutation had lower PD-L1 expression (TC3/IC3: 7.89 % vs. 15.90 %). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that STK11/KEAP1 mutations were independent and significant prognostic factors on overall survival (OS) (both, P < 0.05) and progression-free survival (PFS) (both, P < 0.05). Importantly, patients harbored STK11/KEAP1 mutations had a relatively worse OS than wild type both in those receiving atezolizumab and docetaxel (all, P < 0.05). In addition, for STK11 mutant subset, atezolizumab did not improve OS compared with docetaxel (HR = 0.669; 95 %CI: 0.380-1.179; P = 0.669); while cox-regression analysis showed the improved survival of patients with KEAP1 mutation who receiving atezolizumab compared with docetaxel (HR = 0.610; 95 %CI: 0.384-0.969; P = 0.036).

CONCLUSION

Compared with wild type, non-squamous NSCLC patients with STK11/KEAP1 mutations may not benefit more from both atezolizumab and docetaxel. However, patients with mere KEAP1 mutations and without STK11 mutations may have a better response to atezolizumab than docetaxel.

The level of oncogenic Ras determines the malignant transformation of Lkb1 mutant tissue in vivo

The genetic and metabolic heterogeneity of RAS-driven cancers has confounded therapeutic strategies in the clinic. To address this, rapid and genetically tractable animal models are needed that recapitulate the heterogeneity of RAS-driven cancers in vivo. Here, we generate a Drosophila melanogaster model of Ras/Lkb1 mutant carcinoma. We show that low-level expression of oncogenic Ras (RasLow) promotes the survival of Lkb1 mutant tissue, but results in autonomous cell cycle arrest and non-autonomous overgrowth of wild-type tissue. In contrast, high-level expression of oncogenic Ras (RasHigh) transforms Lkb1 mutant tissue resulting in lethal malignant tumors. Using simultaneous multiview light-sheet microcopy, we have characterized invasion phenotypes of Ras/Lkb1 tumors in living larvae. Our molecular analysis reveals sustained activation of the AMPK pathway in malignant Ras/Lkb1 tumors, and demonstrate the genetic and pharmacologic dependence of these tumors on CaMK-activated Ampk. We further show that LKB1 mutant human lung adenocarcinoma patients with high levels of oncogenic KRAS exhibit worse overall survival and increased AMPK activation. Our results suggest that high levels of oncogenic KRAS is a driving event in the malignant transformation of LKB1 mutant tissue, and uncovers a vulnerability that may be used to target this aggressive genetic subset of RAS-driven tumors.

Atezolizumab prolongs overall survival over docetaxel in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients harboring STK11 or KEAP1 mutation

Somatic mutations of STK11 or KEAP1 are associated with poor clinical outcomes for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), chemotherapy, or targeted therapy. Which treatment regimens work better for STK11 or KEAP1 mutated (SKmut) aNSCLC patients is unknown. In this study, the efficacy of atezolizumab versus docetaxel in SKmut aNSCLC was compared. A total of 157 SKmut aNSCLC patients were identified from POPLAR and OAK trials, who were tested by blood-based FoundationOne next-generation sequencing assay. Detailed clinical data and genetic alterations were collected. Two independent cohorts were used for biomarker validation (n = 30 and 20, respectively). Median overall survival was 7.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.8 to 9.9) in the atezolizumab group versus 5.8 months (95% CI, 4.4 to 7.2) in the docetaxel group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] for death, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.99; P = .042). Among atezolizumab-treated patients, objective response rate, disease control rate, and durable clinical benefit were higher when blood tumor mutation burden (bTMB) and PD-L1 being higher (biomarker 1, n = 61) or with FAT3 mutation-positive tumors (biomarker 2, n = 83) than otherwise. The interactions for survival between these two biomarkers and treatments were significant, which were further validated in two independent cohorts. In SKmut patients with aNSCLC, atezolizumab was associated with significantly longer overall survival in comparison to docetaxel. Having FAT3 mutation or high TMB and PD-L1 expression potentially predict favorable response in SKmut patients receiving atezolizumab.

LKB1 deficiency-induced metabolic reprogramming in tumorigenesis and non-neoplastic diseases

Background

Live kinase B1 (LKB1) is a tumor suppressor that is mutated in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS) and a variety of cancers. Lkb1 encodes serine-threonine kinase (STK) 11 that activates AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and its 13 superfamily members, regulating multiple biological processes, such as cell polarity, cell cycle arrest, embryo development, apoptosis, and bioenergetics metabolism. Increasing evidence has highlighted that deficiency of LKB1 in cancer cells induces extensive metabolic alterations that promote tumorigenesis and development. LKB1 also participates in the maintenance of phenotypes and functions of normal cells through metabolic regulation.

Scope of review

Given the important role of LKB1 in metabolic regulation, we provide an overview of the association of metabolic alterations in glycolysis, aerobic oxidation, the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP), gluconeogenesis, glutamine, lipid, and serine induced by aberrant LKB1 signals in tumor progression, non-neoplastic diseases, and functions of immune cells.

Major conclusions

In this review, we summarize layers of evidence demonstrating that disordered metabolisms in glucose, glutamine, lipid, and serine caused by LKB1 deficiency promote carcinogenesis and non-neoplastic diseases. The metabolic reprogramming resulting from the loss of LKB1 confers cancer cells with growth or survival advantages. Nevertheless, it also causes a metabolic frangibility for LKB1-deficient cancer cells. The metabolic regulation of LKB1 also plays a vital role in maintaining cellular phenotype in the progression of non-neoplastic diseases. In addition, lipid metabolic regulation of LKB1 plays an important role in controlling the function, activity, proliferation, and differentiation of several types of immune cells. We conclude that in-depth knowledge of metabolic pathways regulated by LKB1 is conducive to identifying therapeutic targets and developing drug combinations to treat cancers and metabolic diseases and achieve immunoregulation.

Hypoxia increases the apoptotic response to betulinic acid and betulin in human non-small cell lung cancer cells

Betulinic acid and betulin show promising activity against cancers cells, but the mechanism of their action is still unclear. In this study, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines: A549, H358 and NCI-H1703 were treated with betulinic acid and betulin under normoxic and hypoxic conditions as hypoxia is critically involved in the response of solid tumors to chemotherapy. The treatment inhibits viability and proliferation of NSCLC cells. The anti-proliferative effect was induced by G1 cell cycle arrest with increased p21 expression and decreased cyclin D1 and cyclin B1 expression. Additionally, downregulation of p-GSK3β activity and the Wnt/β-catenin pathway were also observed under hypoxia. We found that hypoxia increased apoptosis in NSCLC cells. Cell death was associated with changes in the expression of proteins involved in the mitochondrial apoptosis pathway and induction of apoptotic death by caspase activation. Additionally, hypoxia exposure deregulated HIF-1α and p53 expression levels. Importantly, treatment with betulinic acid and betulin reduced colony-forming ability under normoxia, however, only betulinic acid reduced clonogenic activity under hypoxia. Our findings that betulinic acid increases apoptotic cell death and clonogenic activity under hypoxic conditions reveal new attractive strategies for treating hypoxic cancer tumors, such as NSCLC.

Primary Resistance to Immune Checkpoint Blockade in an STK11/TP53/KRAS-Mutant Lung Adenocarcinoma with High PD-L1 Expression

Several studies have shown that STK11 and TP53 mutations have different effects on the susceptibility to immune checkpoint blockade in KRAS-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the impact of STK11/TP53 co-mutations on treatment outcomes in the same clinical setting has never been reported. We recently encountered a case of a 70-year-old man who was diagnosed with advanced lung adenocarcinoma with high-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. He received pembrolizumab monotherapy as a frontline treatment; however, the tumor did not respond to this therapy and showed deleterious outcome. Next-generation sequencing revealed that the tumor harbored a rare STK11/TP53/KRAS triple mutation. Our case suggests that these compound mutations may constitute a distinct, aggressive subset that is resistant to immunotherapy even when the tumor strongly expresses PD-L1. In addition, this report highlights the importance of using molecular profiling to detect co-mutations that can be associated with primary resistance or disease progression to improve survival even in the immunotherapy setting.

Tumors Responsive to Autophagy-Inhibition: Identification and Biomarkers

Simple Summary

Although the principle of personalized medicine has been the focus of attention, many cancer therapies are still based on a one-size-fits-all approach. The same holds true for targeting cancer cell survival mechanism that allows cancer cells to recycle their constituents (autophagy). In the past several indicators of elevated dependence of cancer cells on autophagy have been described. Addition of autophagy-inhibiting agents could be beneficial in treatment of these tumors. The biomarkers and mechanisms that lead to elevated dependence on autophagy are reviewed in the current manuscript.

Abstract

Recent advances in cancer treatment modalities reveal the limitations of the prevalent “one-size-fits-all” therapies and emphasize the necessity to develop personalized approaches. In this perspective, identification of predictive biomarkers and intrinsic vulnerabilities are an important advancement for further therapeutic strategies. Autophagy is an important lysosomal degradation and recycling pathway that provides energy and macromolecular precursors to maintain cellular homeostasis. Although all cells require autophagy, several genetic and/or cellular changes elevate the dependence of cancer cells on autophagy for their survival and indicates that autophagy inhibition in these tumors could provide a favorable addition to current therapies. In this context, we review the current literature on tumor (sub)types with elevated dependence on autophagy for their survival and highlight an exploitable vulnerability. We provide an inventory of microenvironmental factors, genetic alterations and therapies that may be exploited with autophagy-targeted approaches to improve efficacy of conventional anti-tumor therapies.

The potent roles of salt-inducible kinases (SIKs) in metabolic homeostasis and tumorigenesis

Salt-inducible kinases (SIKs) belong to AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) family, and functions mainly involve in regulating energy response-related physiological processes, such as gluconeogenesis and lipid metabolism. However, compared with another well-established energy-response kinase AMPK, SIK roles in human diseases, especially in diabetes and tumorigenesis, are rarely investigated. Recently, the pilot roles of SIKs in tumorigenesis have begun to attract more attention due to the finding that the tumor suppressor role of LKB1 in non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) is unexpectedly mediated by the SIK but not AMPK kinases. Thus, here we tend to comprehensively summarize the emerging upstream regulators, downstream substrates, mouse models, clinical relevance, and candidate inhibitors for SIKs, and shed light on SIKs as the potential therapeutic targets for cancer therapies.

LKB1 inactivation leads to centromere defects and genome instability via p53-dependent upregulation of survivin

Inactivating mutations in the liver kinase B1 (LKB1) tumor suppressor gene underlie Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS) and occur frequently in various human cancers. We previously showed that LKB1 regulates centrosome duplication via PLK1. Here, we report that LKB1 further helps to maintain genomic stability through negative regulation of survivin, a member of the chromosomal passenger complex (CPC) that mediates CPC targeting to the centromere. We found that loss of LKB1 led to accumulation of misaligned and lagging chromosomes at metaphase and anaphase and increased the appearance of multi- and micro-nucleated cells. Ectopic LKB1 expression reduced these features and improved mitotic fidelity in LKB1-deficient cells. Through pharmacological and genetic manipulations, we showed that LKB1-mediated repression of survivin is independent of AMPK, but requires p53. Consistent with the key influence of LKB1 on survivin expression, immunohistochemical analysis indicated that survivin is highly expressed in intestinal polyps from a PJS patient. Lastly, we reaffirm a potential therapeutic avenue to treat LKB1-mutated tumors by demonstrating the increased sensitivity to survivin inhibitors of LKB1-deficient cells.

Role of INSL4 Signaling in Sustaining the Growth and Viability of LKB1-Inactivated Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

The LKB1 tumor suppressor gene is commonly inactivated in non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLC), a major form of lung cancer. Targeted therapies for LKB1-inactivated lung cancer are currently unavailable. Identification of critical signaling components downstream of LKB1 inactivation has the potential to uncover rational therapeutic targets. Here we investigated the role of INSL4, a member of the insulin/IGF/relaxin superfamily, in LKB1-inactivated NSCLCs.

METHODS

INSL4 expression was analyzed using global transcriptome profiling, quantitative reverse transcription PCR, western blotting, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and RNA in situ hybridization in human NSCLC cell lines and tumor specimens. INSL4 gene expression and clinical data from The Cancer Genome Atlas lung adenocarcinomas (n = 515) were analyzed using log-rank and Fisher exact tests. INSL4 functions were studied using short hairpin RNA (shRNA) knockdown, overexpression, transcriptome profiling, cell growth, and survival assays in vitro and in vivo. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

INSL4 was identified as a novel downstream target of LKB1 deficiency and its expression was induced through aberrant CRTC-CREB activation. INSL4 was highly induced in LKB1-deficient NSCLC cells (up to 543-fold) and 9 of 41 primary tumors, although undetectable in all normal tissues except the placenta. Lung adenocarcinomas from The Cancer Genome Atlas with high and low INSL4 expression (with the top 10th percentile as cutoff) showed statistically significant differences for advanced tumor stage (P < .001), lymph node metastasis (P = .001), and tumor size (P = .01). The INSL4-high group showed worse survival than the INSL4-low group (P < .001). Sustained INSL4 expression was required for the growth and viability of LKB1-inactivated NSCLC cells in vitro and in a mouse xenograft model (n = 5 mice per group). Expression profiling revealed INSL4 as a critical regulator of cell cycle, growth, and survival.

CONCLUSIONS

LKB1 deficiency induces an autocrine INSL4 signaling that critically supports the growth and survival of lung cancer cells. Therefore, aberrant INSL4 signaling is a promising therapeutic target for LKB1-deficient lung cancers.

LKB1/STK11 Expression in Lung Adenocarcinoma and Associations With Patterns of Recurrence

BACKGROUND

Mutations in the serine/threonine kinase 11 (STK11)/liver kinase B1 (LKB1) have been implicated in mediating resistance to checkpoint blockade among patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma. We sought to examine the associations between clinicopathologic characteristics, tumor LKB1 expression, features of the immune microenvironment, and postoperative prognosis among patients with early stage lung adenocarcinoma undergoing surgical therapy.

METHODS

Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens of patients undergoing resection of stage I to III, chemotherapy-naïve adenocarcinomas (1997 to 2008) were analyzed using tissue microarray sectioning. Sublobar resections were excluded. Intratumoral LKB1/STK11 expression was quantified as H-score. In a subset, tumor-associated immune cell populations were quantified using whole tumor sections in peritumoral and intratumoral compartments.

RESULTS

In all, 104 patients met inclusion criteria. Expression of LKB1/STK11 (median H-score 102.9) was higher in women (median 123.3) than in men (100, P = .004) and in never-smokers (median 145) than in former/current smokers (100, P = .002). Expression of LKB1/STK11 was positively correlated with intratumoral infiltration of cluster of differentiation (CD) 3⁺ (r = 0.351, P = .005), CD4⁺ (r = 0.436, P < .001), and CD8⁺ (r = 0.263, P = .049) cells. Patients with extrathoracic recurrence had lower tumor expression of LKB1/STK11 than did other patients with recurrent disease. On multivariate analysis, low LKB1/STK11 expression remained independently associated with poor disease-free survival and distant disease-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Low LKB1/STK11 expression is associated with specific patient characteristics and poor postoperative prognosis in chemotherapy-naïve lung adenocarcinoma. Further investigation is warranted to delineate its clinical significance in the context of evaluating novel therapeutic agents in patients with resectable disease.