PIM kinases phosphorylate lactate dehydrogenase A at serine 161 and suppress its nuclear ubiquitination

Lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA) is a glycolytic enzyme catalysing the reversible conversion of pyruvate to lactate. It has been implicated as a substrate for PIM kinases, yet the relevant target sites and functional consequences of phosphorylation have remained unknown. Here, we show that all three PIM family members can phosphorylate LDHA at serine 161. When we investigated the physiological consequences of this phosphorylation in PC3 prostate cancer and MCF7 breast cancer cells, we noticed that it suppressed ubiquitin-mediated degradation of nuclear LDHA and promoted interactions between LDHA and 14-3-3 proteins. By contrast, in CRISPR/Cas9-edited knock-out cells lacking all three PIM family members, ubiquitination of nuclear LDHA was dramatically increased followed by its decreased expression. Our data suggest that PIM kinases support nuclear LDHA expression and activities by promoting phosphorylation-dependent interactions of LDHA with 14-3-3ε, which shields nuclear LDHA from ubiquitin-mediated degradation.

Abstract 79: Crosstalk of PIM and LKB1 kinases in driving growth of prostate cancer cells

The oncogenic PIM kinases and the tumor-suppressive LKB1 kinase have been linked to regulation of cell growth and proliferation. Here we have investigated their potential interactions as well as their relative impacts on tumorigenic growth of prostate cancer cells. The cellular functions of PIM and LKB1 kinases were evaluated using either pan-PIM inhibitors or CRISPR/Cas9-based genomic editing, with which all three PIM family members and/or LKB1 were knocked out from PC3 prostate cancer cells. In addition to cell-based 2D proliferation assays, we examined tumor growth using the chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) xenograft model. In this report, we show that inhibition of PIM expression or activity results in increased phosphorylation of AMPK at Thr172 in an LKB1-dependent fashion. With in vitro kinase assays, we demonstrate that LKB1 is a novel direct substrate for PIM kinases and that Ser334 is one of the PIM target sites in LKB1. Accordingly, wild-type LKB1, but not the phosphodeficient S334A mutant can restore PIM inhibitor-induced AMPK phosphorylation in LKB1 knock-out cells. Whereas loss of LKB1 exaggerates formation of PC3-based tumors in the CAM xenograft model, co-deletion of PIM kinases attenuates it. The impairment of cell proliferation and tumor growth in cells lacking both PIM and LKB1 kinases not only underscores the potential crosstalk in signaling between these kinases, but also suggest that PIM inhibitors could be used to restrain growth of LKB1-deficient tumors.

Citation Format: Kwan Long Mung, William Eccleshall, Niina M. Santio, Adolfo Rivero-Müller, Cecilia Sahlgren, Päivi J. Koskinen. Crosstalk of PIM and LKB1 kinases in driving growth of prostate cancer cells [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 79.

PIM kinases inhibit AMPK activation and promote tumorigenicity by phosphorylating LKB1

BACKGROUND

The oncogenic PIM kinases and the tumor-suppressive LKB1 kinase have both been implicated in the regulation of cell growth and metabolism, albeit in opposite directions. Here we investigated whether these kinases interact with each other to influence AMPK activation and tumorigenic growth of prostate and breast cancer cells.

METHODS

We first determined how PIM and LKB1 kinases affect AMPK phosphorylation levels. We then used in vitro kinase assays to demonstrate that LKB1 is phosphorylated by PIM kinases, and site-directed mutagenesis to identify the PIM target sites in LKB1. The cellular functions of PIM and LKB1 kinases were evaluated using either pan-PIM inhibitors or CRISPR/Cas9 genomic editing, with which all three PIM family members and/or LKB1 were knocked out from PC3 prostate and MCF7 breast cancer cell lines. In addition to cell proliferation assays, we examined the effects of PIM and/or LKB1 loss on tumor growth using the chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) xenograft model.

RESULTS

We provide both genetic and pharmacological evidence to demonstrate that inhibition of PIM expression or activity increases phosphorylation of AMPK at Thr172 in both PC3 and MCF7 cells, but not in their derivatives lacking LKB1. This is explained by our observation that all three PIM family kinases can phosphorylate LKB1 at Ser334. Wild-type LKB1, but not its phosphodeficient derivative, can restore PIM inhibitor-induced AMPK phosphorylation in LKB1 knock-out cells. In the CAM model, loss of LKB1 enhances tumorigenicity of PC3 xenografts, while cells lacking both LKB1 and PIMs exhibit slower proliferation rates and form smaller tumors.

CONCLUSION

PIM kinases are novel negative regulators of LKB1 that affect AMPK activity in an LKB1-dependent fashion. The impairment of cell proliferation and tumor growth in cells lacking both LKB1 and PIMs indicates that these kinases possess a shared signaling role in the context of cancer. These data also suggest that PIM inhibitors may be a rational therapeutic option for LKB1-deficient tumors. Video Abstract.

PIM1 accelerates prostate cancer cell motility by phosphorylating actin capping proteins

Background

The PIM family kinases promote cancer cell survival and motility as well as metastatic growth in various types of cancer. We have previously identified several PIM substrates, which support cancer cell migration and invasiveness. However, none of them are known to regulate cellular movements by directly interacting with the actin cytoskeleton. Here we have studied the phosphorylation-dependent effects of PIM1 on actin capping proteins, which bind as heterodimers to the fast-growing actin filament ends and stabilize them.

Methods

Based on a phosphoproteomics screen for novel PIM substrates, we have used kinase assays and fluorescence-based imaging techniques to validate actin capping proteins as PIM1 substrates and interaction partners. We have analysed the functional consequences of capping protein phosphorylation on cell migration and adhesion by using wound healing and real-time impedance-based assays. We have also investigated phosphorylation-dependent effects on actin polymerization by analysing the protective role of capping protein phosphomutants in actin disassembly assays.

Results

We have identified capping proteins CAPZA1 and CAPZB2 as PIM1 substrates, and shown that phosphorylation of either of them leads to increased adhesion and migration of human prostate cancer cells. Phosphorylation also reduces the ability of the capping proteins to protect polymerized actin from disassembly.

Conclusions

Our data suggest that PIM kinases are able to induce changes in actin dynamics to support cell adhesion and movement. Thus, we have identified a novel mechanism through which PIM kinases enhance motility and metastatic behaviour of cancer cells.