1
|
Okato A, Utsumi T, Ranieri M, Zheng X, Zhou M, Pereira LD, Chen T, Kita Y, Wu D, Hyun H, Lee H, Gdowski AS, Raupp JD, Clark-Garvey S, Manocha U, Chafitz A, Sherman F, Stephens J, Rose TL, Milowsky MI, Wobker SE, Serody JS, Damrauer JS, Wong KK, Kim WY. FGFR inhibition augments anti-PD-1 efficacy in murine FGFR3-mutant bladder cancer by abrogating immunosuppression. J Clin Invest 2024; 134:e169241. [PMID: 38226620 PMCID: PMC10786699 DOI: 10.1172/jci169241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2024] Open
Abstract
The combination of targeted therapy with immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) is an area of intense interest. We studied the interaction of fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibition with ICI in urothelial carcinoma (UC) of the bladder, in which FGFR3 is altered in 50% of cases. Using an FGFR3-driven, Trp53-mutant genetically engineered murine model (UPFL), we demonstrate that UPFL tumors recapitulate the histology and molecular subtype of their FGFR3-altered human counterparts. Additionally, UPFL1 allografts exhibit hyperprogression to ICI associated with an expansion of T regulatory cells (Tregs). Erdafitinib blocked Treg proliferation in vitro, while in vivo ICI-induced Treg expansion was fully abrogated by FGFR inhibition. Combined erdafitinib and ICI resulted in high therapeutic efficacy. In aggregate, our work establishes that, in mice, co-alteration of FGFR3 and Trp53 results in high-grade, non-muscle-invasive UC and presents a previously underappreciated role for FGFR inhibition in blocking ICI-induced Treg expansion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atsushi Okato
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Takanobu Utsumi
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Michela Ranieri
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Xingnan Zheng
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Mi Zhou
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Luiza D. Pereira
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ting Chen
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Yuki Kita
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Di Wu
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Hyesun Hyun
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Hyojin Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, South Korea
| | - Andrew S. Gdowski
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - John D. Raupp
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Sean Clark-Garvey
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ujjawal Manocha
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Alison Chafitz
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Fiona Sherman
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Janaye Stephens
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Tracy L. Rose
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Medicine
| | - Matthew I. Milowsky
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Medicine
| | - Sara E. Wobker
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
| | - Jonathan S. Serody
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Medicine
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology
| | - Jeffrey S. Damrauer
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Medicine
| | - Kwok-Kin Wong
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University, New York, New York, USA
| | - William Y. Kim
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Medicine
- Department of Genetics, and
- Department of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dominant role of CDKN2B/p15INK4B of 9p21.3 tumor suppressor hub in inhibition of cell-cycle and glycolysis. Nat Commun 2021; 12:2047. [PMID: 33824349 PMCID: PMC8024281 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-22327-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2020] [Accepted: 03/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Human chromosome 9p21.3 is susceptible to inactivation in cell immortalization and diseases, such as cancer, coronary artery disease and type-2 diabetes. Although this locus encodes three cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitors (p15INK4B, p14ARF and p16INK4A), our understanding of their functions and modes of action is limited to the latter two. Here, we show that in vitro p15INK4B is markedly stronger than p16INK4A in inhibiting pRb1 phosphorylation, E2F activity and cell-cycle progression. In mice, urothelial cells expressing oncogenic HRas and lacking p15INK4B, but not those expressing HRas and lacking p16INK4A, develop early-onset bladder tumors. The potency of CDKN2B/p15INK4B in tumor suppression relies on its strong binding via key N-terminal residues to and inhibition of CDK4/CDK6. p15INK4B also binds and inhibits enolase-1, a glycolytic enzyme upregulated in most cancer types. Our results highlight the dual inhibition of p15INK4B on cell proliferation, and unveil mechanisms whereby p15INK4B aberrations may underpin cancer and non-cancer conditions. The human chromosome locus 9p21.3 is a tumour suppressor hub which encodes three CDK inhibitors, p15INK4B, p14ARF and p16INK4A. Here, the authors show that p15INK4B inhibits the cell cycle and glycolysis in a murine model of HRas + ‐mediated urothelial carcinoma and has a more relevant role as a tumour suppressor than its neighbouring p16INK4A.
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
The identification of mutations in FGFR3 in bladder tumors in 1999 led to major interest in this receptor and during the subsequent 20 years much has been learnt about the mutational profiles found in bladder cancer, the phenotypes associated with these and the potential of this mutated protein as a target for therapy. Based on mutational and expression data, it is estimated that >80% of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancers (NMIBC) and ∼40% of muscle-invasive bladder cancers (MIBC) have upregulated FGFR3 signalling, and these frequencies are likely to be even higher if alternative splicing of the receptor, expression of ligands and changes in regulatory mechanisms are taken into account. Major efforts by the pharmaceutical industry have led to development of a range of agents targeting FGFR3 and other FGF receptors. Several of these have entered clinical trials, and some have presented very encouraging early results in advanced bladder cancer. Recent reviews have summarised the drugs and related clinical trials in this area. This review will summarise what is known about the effects of FGFR3 and its mutant forms in normal urothelium and bladder tumors, will suggest when and how this protein contributes to urothelial cancer pathogenesis and will highlight areas that may benefit from further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret A. Knowles
- Division of Molecular Medicine, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James’s, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chronic Sulforaphane Administration Inhibits Resistance to the mTOR-Inhibitor Everolimus in Bladder Cancer Cells. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:ijms21114026. [PMID: 32512849 PMCID: PMC7312500 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21114026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2020] [Revised: 05/28/2020] [Accepted: 06/03/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Progressive bladder cancer growth is associated with abnormal activation of the mammalian target of the rapamycin (mTOR) pathway, but treatment with an mTOR inhibitor has not been as effective as expected. Rather, resistance develops under chronic drug use, prompting many patients to lower their relapse risk by turning to natural, plant-derived products. The present study was designed to evaluate whether the natural compound, sulforaphane (SFN), combined with the mTOR inhibitor everolimus, could block the growth and proliferation of bladder cancer cells in the short- and long-term. The bladder cancer cell lines RT112, UMUC3, and TCCSUP were exposed short- (24 h) or long-term (8 weeks) to everolimus (0.5 nM) or SFN (2.5 µM) alone or in combination. Cell growth, proliferation, apoptosis, cell cycle progression, and cell cycle regulating proteins were evaluated. siRNA blockade was used to investigate the functional impact of the proteins. Short-term application of SFN and/or everolimus resulted in significant tumor growth suppression, with additive inhibition on clonogenic tumor growth. Long-term everolimus treatment resulted in resistance development characterized by continued growth, and was associated with elevated Akt-mTOR signaling and cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)1 phosphorylation and down-regulation of p19 and p27. In contrast, SFN alone or SFN+everolimus reduced cell growth and proliferation. Akt and Rictor signaling remained low, and p19 and p27 expressions were high under combined drug treatment. Long-term exposure to SFN+everolimus also induced acetylation of the H3 and H4 histones. Phosphorylation of CDK1 was diminished, whereby down-regulation of CDK1 and its binding partner, Cyclin B, inhibited tumor growth. In conclusion, the addition of SFN to the long-term everolimus application inhibits resistance development in bladder cancer cells in vitro. Therefore, sulforaphane may hold potential for treating bladder carcinoma in patients with resistance to an mTOR inhibitor.
Collapse
|
6
|
Shimazui T, Yoshikawa K, Ishitsuka R, Kojima T, Kandori S, Yoshino T, Miyazaki J, Uchida K, Nishiyama H. Systemic transduction of p16 INK4a antitumor peptide inhibits lung metastasis of the MBT-2 bladder tumor cell line in mice. Oncol Lett 2019; 17:1203-1210. [PMID: 30655885 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2018.9655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2018] [Accepted: 07/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
p16INK4a (p16) is a key molecule in bladder tumor (BT) development. We previously reported that a p16 antitumor peptide inhibited the growth of subcutaneous BT grafts in mice through restoration of p16 function using a Wr-T peptide transporter system. In the present study, the efficacy of mouse p16 peptide administration in a mouse lung metastasis model for BT and also the toxicity of peptides by cardiac peptide injection were evaluated. Mouse lung metastases were developed by tail vein injection of a p16-deficient MBT-2 cell line. Six-week-old C3H/He female mice were divided into three groups: A control group (n=12) receiving no treatment; a group treated once on the 3rd experimental day (n=12); and a group treated three times on the 3rd, 5th and 7th experimental days (n=10) with an injection of a mixture of 80 nmol mouse p16 peptide and 50 nmol Wr-T into the tail vein. At the 14th experimental day, the lung metastases were histologically evaluated. Lung metastases were observed in 100% (12/12), 41.7% (5/12) and 30% (3/10) of the aforementioned three groups, respectively. The number and area of metastatic lung tumors were significantly different between control and treatment groups (control vs. triple treatment group for the number and area, P=0.0029 and P=0.0296, respectively). Immunohistochemistry demonstrated that phosphorylated retinoblastoma (Rb) protein was decreased in lung tumors of the treatment groups, compared with the control group. The toxicity of p16 peptide transduction was evaluated by using low-dose treatment (three dosages) and high-dose treatment (two dosages) on three male and three female C3H/He mice in early and late experimental phases. In low and high dose groups, no notable change was determined in body weight or blood analyses in early or late phases following mouse p16 peptide administration. In addition, no notable change was observed histologically in bone marrow of treatment groups. To conclude, systemic p16 peptide administration decreased lung tumor development in a mouse metastatic BT model without severe adverse events, as assessed by blood analyses and histological evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toru Shimazui
- Department of Urology, Ibaraki Clinical Education and Training Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Kasama, Ibaraki 309-1793, Japan.,Department of Urology, Ibaraki Prefectural Central Hospital, Kasama, Ibaraki 309-1793, Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Yoshikawa
- Division of Research Creation and Biobank, Research Creation Support Center, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, Aichi 480-1195, Japan
| | - Ryutaro Ishitsuka
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kojima
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575, Japan
| | - Shuya Kandori
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575, Japan
| | - Takayuki Yoshino
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575, Japan
| | - Jun Miyazaki
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Ichikawa, Chiba 272-0827, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Uchida
- Department of Molecular Biological Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Nishiyama
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575, Japan
| |
Collapse
|