Engineering Factor Xa Inhibitor with Multiple Platelet-Binding Sites Facilitates its Platelet Targeting

Engineering a "three-in-one" hirudin prodrug to reduce bleeding risk: A proof-of-concept study

An ideal anticoagulant should have at least three properties including targeted delivery to the thrombosis site, local activation or releasing to centralize the anti-thrombosis effects and thus reduce the bleeding risks, and long persistence in circulation to avoid repeated administration. In the present study, we sought to test a "three-in-one" strategy to design new protein anticoagulants. Based on these criteria, we constructed two hirudin prodrugs, R824-HV-ABD and ABD-HV-R824. The R824 peptide can bind phosphatidylserine on the surface of the procoagulant platelets and thus guide the prodrug to the thrombosis sites; albumin-binding domain (ABDs) can bind the prodrug to albumin, and thereby increase its persistence in circulation; the hirudin (HV) core in the prodrug is flanked by factor Xa recognition sites, thus factor Xa at the thrombosis site can cleave the fusion proteins and release the activated hirudin locally. Hirudin prodrugs were able to bind with procoagulant platelets and human serum albumin in vitro with high affinity, targeted concentrated and prevented the formation of occlusive thrombi in rat carotid artery injury model. Their effective time was significantly extended compared to native hirudin, and R824-HV-ABD showed a significantly improved half-life of about 24 h in rats. The bleeding time of prodrug-treated mice was much shorter than that of hirudin-treated mice. The results from the proof-of-concept studies, for the first time, demonstrate that "three-in-one" prodrug strategy may be a good solution for protein or peptide anticoagulants to reduce their bleeding risks.

Platelet-targeted dual pathway antithrombotic inhibits thrombosis with preserved hemostasis

Despite advances in antithrombotic therapy, the risk of recurrent coronary/cerebrovascular ischemia or venous thromboembolism remains high. Dual pathway antithrombotic blockade, using both antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy, offers the promise of improved thrombotic protection; however, widespread adoption remains tempered by substantial risk of major bleeding. Here, we report a dual pathway therapeutic capable of site-specific targeting to activated platelets and therapeutic enrichment at the site of thrombus growth to allow reduced dosing without compromised antithrombotic efficacy. We engineered a recombinant fusion protein, SCE5-TAP, which consists of a single-chain antibody (SCE5) that targets and blocks the activated GPIIb/IIIa complex, and tick anticoagulant peptide (TAP), a potent direct inhibitor of activated factor X (FXa). SCE5-TAP demonstrated selective platelet targeting and inhibition of thrombosis in murine models of both carotid artery and inferior vena cava thrombosis, without a significant impact on hemostasis. Selective targeting to activated platelets provides an attractive strategy to achieve high antithrombotic efficacy with reduced risk of bleeding complications.

Evaluation of activated charcoal and lipid emulsion treatment in model of acute rivaroxaban toxicity

AIM

Reducing or reversing the toxicity effects of new oral anticoagulants is an important question.The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the effect of lipid emulsion (LE) and Activated Charcoal (AC) therapy on the intoxication of rivaroxaban, on mice.

METHODS

Adult male Balb/c mice weighing approximately 30g were used in the study. Seven groups were assigned, with six mice in each group. Groups were defined; given only rivaroxaban, given only LE, given only AC, after the administration of rivaroxaban LE applied group in the 1st hour, after the administration of rivaroxaban LE applied group in the 3rd hour, after the administration of rivaroxaban AC applied group in the1st hour, after the administration of rivaroxaban AC applied group in the 1st hour and LE applied group in the 3rd hour. PT and Anti-Factor Xa activity were measured in all blood samples from subjects.

RESULTS

A statistically significant difference was found when all groups were compared in terms of mean PT values and Anti-FactorXa values. However, no statistically significant difference was found in the mean PT and Anti-FactorXa values when only rivaroxaban administrated group and after the administration of rivaroxaban LE and/or AC applied groups were compared one to one. No deaths occurred in groups during the observation.

CONCLUSION

Although the administration of either AC or LE alone or in combination resulted in a decrease in the mean values of PT and anti-Factor Xa, in case of rivaroxaban toxicity, but one-to-one comparison of the groups was not statistically significant.