Identification of Gal4 activation domain-binding proteins in the 26S proteasome by periodate-triggered cross-linking

Cross-linking strategies to study peptide ligand-receptor interactions

Experiments are described that allowed cross-linking of analogs of a 13-amino acid peptide into the binding site of a model G protein-coupled receptor. Syntheses of peptide analogs that were used for photochemical or chemical cross-linking were carried out using solid-phase peptide synthesis. Chemical cross-linking utilized 3,4-dihydroxy-l-phenylalanine-incorporated peptides and subsequent periodate-mediated activation, whereas photochemical cross-linking was mediated by p-benzoyl-l-phenylalanine (Bpa)-labeled peptides and UV-initiated activation. Mass spectrometry was employed to locate the site(s) in the receptor that formed the cross-links to the ligand. We also describe a method called unnatural amino acid replacement that allowed capture of a peptide ligand into the receptor. In this method, the receptor was genetically modified by replacement of a natural amino acid with Bpa. The modified receptor was UV-irradiated to capture the ligand. The approaches described are applicable to other peptide-binding proteins and can reveal the ligand-binding site in atomic detail.

The 26S proteasome and initiation of gene transcription

Transcription activation is the foremost step of gene expression and is modulated by various factors that act in synergy. Misregulation of this process and its associated factors has severe effects and hence requires strong regulatory control. In recent years, growing evidence has highlighted the 26S proteasome as an important contributor to the regulation of transcription initiation. Well known for its role in protein destruction, its contribution to protein synthesis was initially viewed with skepticism. However, studies over the past several years have established the proteasome as an important component of transcription initiation through proteolytic and non-proteolytic activities. In this review, we discuss findings made so far in understanding the connections between transcription initiation and the 26S proteasome complex.

Ubiquitin and proteasomes in transcription

Regulation of gene transcription is vitally important for the maintenance of normal cellular homeostasis. Failure to correctly regulate gene expression, or to deal with problems that arise during the transcription process, can lead to cellular catastrophe and disease. One of the ways cells cope with the challenges of transcription is by making extensive use of the proteolytic and nonproteolytic activities of the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS). Here, we review recent evidence showing deep mechanistic connections between the transcription and ubiquitin-proteasome systems. Our goal is to leave the reader with a sense that just about every step in transcription-from transcription initiation through to export of mRNA from the nucleus-is influenced by the UPS and that all major arms of the system--from the first step in ubiquitin (Ub) conjugation through to the proteasome-are recruited into transcriptional processes to provide regulation, directionality, and deconstructive power.

A two-hybrid assay to study protein interactions within the secretory pathway

Interactions of transcriptional activators are difficult to study using transcription-based two-hybrid assays due to potent activation resulting in false positives. Here we report the development of the Golgi two-hybrid (G2H), a method that interrogates protein interactions within the Golgi, where transcriptional activators can be assayed with negligible background. The G2H relies on cell surface glycosylation to report extracellularly on protein-protein interactions occurring within the secretory pathway. In the G2H, protein pairs are fused to modular domains of the reporter glycosyltransferase, Och1p, and proper cell wall formation due to Och1p activity is observed only when a pair of proteins interacts. Cells containing interacting protein pairs are identified by selectable phenotypes associated with Och1p activity and proper cell wall formation: cells that have interacting proteins grow under selective conditions and display weak wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) binding by flow cytometry, whereas cells that lack interacting proteins display stunted growth and strong WGA binding. Using this assay, we detected the interaction between transcription factor MyoD and its binding partner Id2. Interfering mutations along the MyoD:Id2 interaction interface ablated signal in the G2H assay. Furthermore, we used the G2H to detect interactions of the activation domain of Gal4p with a variety of binding partners. Finally, selective conditions were used to enrich for cells encoding interacting partners. The G2H detects protein-protein interactions that cannot be identified via traditional two-hybrid methods and should be broadly useful for probing previously inaccessible subsets of the interactome, including transcriptional activators and proteins that traffic through the secretory pathway.

The proteasome and its regulatory roles in gene expression

Cumulative evidence indicates that the proteasome, which is mainly known as a protein-degrading machine, is very essential for gene expression. Destructive functions of the proteasome, i.e., ubiquitin-dependent proteolytic activity, are significant for activator localization, activator destruction, co-activator/repressor destruction and PIC disassembly. Non-proteolytic functions of the proteasome are important for recruitment of activators and co-activators to promoters, ubiquitin-dependent histone modification, transcription elongation and possibly maturation of mRNA via the facilitation of mRNA export from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. In this review, we discuss how the proteasome regulates transcription at numerous stages during gene expression. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled The 26S Proteasome: When degradation is just not enough!

Cks1 activates transcription by binding to the ubiquitylated proteasome

Cyclin-dependent kinase-associated protein 1 (Cks1) is involved in the control of the transcription of a subset of genes in addition to its role in controlling the cell cycle in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. By directly ligating Cks1 onto a GAL1 promoter-driven reporter, we demonstrated that Cks1 acts as a transcription activator. Using this method, we dissected the downstream events from Cks1 recruitment at the promoter. We showed that subsequent to promoter binding, Cdc28 binding is required to modulate the level of gene expression. The ubiquitin-binding domain of Cks1 is essential for implementing downstream transcription events, which appears to recruit the proteasome via ubiquitylated proteasome subunits. We propose that the selective ability of Cks1 to bind ubiquitin allows this small molecule the flexibility to bind large protein complexes with specificity and that this may represent a novel mechanism of regulating transcriptional activation.

The hydrophobic patch of ubiquitin is required to protect transactivator-promoter complexes from destabilization by the proteasomal ATPases

Mono-ubiquitylation of a transactivator is known to promote transcriptional activation of certain transactivator proteins. For the Sacchromyces cerevisiae transactivator, GAL4, attachment of mono-ubiquitin prevents destabilization of the DNA-transactivator complex by the ATPases of the 26S proteasome. This inhibition of destabilization depends on the arrangement of ubiquitin; a chain of ubiquitin tetramers linked through lysine 48 did not display the same protective effect as mono-ubiquitin. This led to an investigation into the properties of ubiquitin that may be responsible for this difference in activity between the different forms. We demonstrate the ubiquitin tetramers linked through lysine 63 do protect from proteasomal-mediated destabilization. In addition, we show that the mutating the isoleucine residue at position 44 interferes with proteasomal interaction in vitro and will abolish the protective activity in vivo. Together, these data implicate the hydrophobic patch of ubiquitin as required to protect transactivators from destabilization by the proteasomal ATPases.

Impact of nonnatural amino acid mutagenesis on the in vivo function and binding modes of a transcriptional activator

Protein-protein interactions play an essential role in cellular function, and methods to discover and characterize them in their native context are of paramount importance for gaining a deeper understanding of biological networks. In this study, an enhanced nonsense suppression system was utilized to incorporate the nonnatural amino acid p-benzoyl-L-phenylalanine (pBpa) throughout the transcriptional activation domain of the prototypical eukaryotic transcriptional activator Gal4 in vivo (S. cerevisiae). Functional studies of the pBpa-containing Gal4 mutants suggest that this essential binding interface of Gal4 is minimally impacted by these substitutions, with both transcriptional activity and sensitivity to growth conditions maintained. Further supporting this are in vivo cross-linking studies, including the detection of a key binding partner of Gal4, the inhibitor protein Gal80. Cross-linking with a range of pBpa-containing mutants revealed a Gal4 x Gal80 binding interface that extends beyond that previously predicted by conventional strategies. Thus, this approach can be broadened to the discovery of novel binding partners of transcription factors, information that will be critical for the development of therapeutically useful small molecule modulators of these protein-protein interactions.

Non-proteolytic regulation of p53-mediated transcription through destabilization of the activator.promoter complex by the proteasomal ATPases

It has been shown previously that sub-complexes of the 26 S proteasome can regulate gene expression via non-proteolytic mechanisms. One such mechanism is the disruption of activator.promoter complexes in an ATP-dependent fashion, which was discovered in the context of the yeast Gal4 system. This activity strongly inhibits Gal4-driven gene expression unless the activator is mono-ubiquitylated, which protects it from the ATPases. To address whether this paradigm is also applicable to medically important mammalian transcriptional activators we report here a study of the interaction of the proteasomal ATPases with p53. It is shown that p53 binds directly to the ATPases via its C-terminal tetramerization and regulatory domain and that p53.promoter complexes are indeed vulnerable to ATPase-dependent disruption by the ATPase complex in vitro. Knockdown of one of the ATPases, Rpt6, in living cells results in increased occupancy of the p21(waf1) promoter by p53 and increased expression of the gene, consistent with the idea that the proteasomal ATPases negatively regulate p53 function in a non-proteolytic fashion.

Phosphorylation of the Gal4 DNA-binding domain is essential for activator mono-ubiquitylation and efficient promoter occupancy

Recent analysis of a Gal4 mutant (Gap71) carrying three point mutations (S22D, K23Q and K25F) in its DNA-binding domain (DBD), has demonstrated that it cannot occupy GAL promoters efficiently in cells and that it is not mono-ubiquitylated, suggesting a functional link between this modification and stable DNA binding in cells. The mechanistic underpinning of this phenotype is that this protein is hypersensitive to a newly discovered activity of the proteasomal ATPases--their ability to actively dissociate transcription factor-DNA complexes after direct interaction with the activation domain. In this paper, we examine the roles of each of the three point mutations contained in Gap71 individually. These experiments have revealed that serine 22 is a site of phosphorylation in the Gal4 DBD and that lysine 23 is essential for S22 phosphorylation, possibly acting as part of the kinase recognition site. Mutation of either residue blocks Gal4 DBD phosphorylation, its subsequent ubiquitylation and compromises the ability of the activator to bind promoter DNA in vivo. These data represent the first report of an essential phosphorylation event that is critical for the activity of this paradigmatic transcription factor.

Metabolic control of transcription: paradigms and lessons from Saccharomyces cerevisiae

The comparatively simple eukaryote Saccharomyces cerevisiae is composed of some 6000 individual genes. Specific sets of these genes can be transcribed co-ordinately in response to particular metabolic signals. The resultant integrated response to nutrient challenge allows the organism to survive and flourish in a variety of environmental conditions while minimal energy is expended upon the production of unnecessary proteins. The Zn(II)2Cys6 family of transcriptional regulators is composed of some 46 members in S. cerevisiae and many of these have been implicated in mediating transcriptional responses to specific nutrients. Gal4p, the archetypical member of this family, is responsible for the expression of the GAL genes when galactose is utilized as a carbon source. The regulation of Gal4p activity has been studied for many years, but we are still uncovering both nuances and fundamental control mechanisms that impinge on its function. In the present review, we describe the latest developments in the regulation of GAL gene expression and compare the mechanisms employed here with the molecular control of other Zn(II)2Cys6 transcriptional regulators. This reveals a wide array of protein-protein, protein-DNA and protein-nutrient interactions that are employed by this family of regulators.

Physical and functional interactions of monoubiquitylated transactivators with the proteasome

Destabilization of activator-DNA complexes by the proteasomal ATPases can inhibit transcription by limiting activator interaction with DNA. Modification of the activator by monoubiquitylation protects the activator from this destabilization activity. In this study, we probe the mechanism of this protective effect of monoubiquitylation. Using novel label transfer and chemical cross-linking techniques, we show that ubiquitin contacts the ATPase complex directly, apparently via Rpn1 and Rpt1. This interaction results in the dissociation of the activation domain-ATPase complex via an allosteric process. A model is proposed in which activator monoubiquitylation serves to limit the lifetime of the activator-ATPase complex interaction and thus the ability of the ATPases to unfold the activator and dissociate the protein-DNA complex.

Activation domain-dependent monoubiquitylation of Gal4 protein is essential for promoter binding in vivo

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Gal4 protein is a paradigmatic transcriptional activator containing a C-terminal acidic activation domain (AD) of 34 amino acids. A mutation that results in the truncation of about two-thirds of the Gal4AD (gal4D) results in a crippled protein with only 3% the activity of the wild-type activator. We show here that although the Gal4D protein is not intrinsically deficient in DNA binding, it is nonetheless unable to stably occupy GAL promoters in vivo. This is because of the activity of the proteasomal ATPases, including Sug1/Rpt6, which bind to Gal4D via the remainder of the AD and strip it off of DNA. A mutation that suppressed the Gal4D "no growth on galactose" phenotype repressed the stripping activity of the ATPase complex but not other activities. We further demonstrate that Gal4D is hypersensitive to this stripping activity because of its failure to be monoubiquitylated efficiently in vivo and in vitro. Evidence is presented that the piece of the AD that is deleted in Gal4D protein is likely a recognition element for the E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase that modifies Gal4. These data argue that acidic ADs comprise at least two small peptide subdomains, one of which is responsible for activator monoubiquitylation and another that interacts with the proteasomal ATPases, coactivators and other transcription factors. This study validates the physiological importance of Gal4 monoubiquitylation and clarifies its major role as that of protecting the activator from being destabilized by the proteasomal ATPases.

Rapid identification of the pharmacophore in a peptoid inhibitor of the proteasome regulatory particle

Here we report a simple and effective method to identify the minimal pharmacophore in the first peptoid inhibitor of the 19S proteasome regulatory particle, which has led to the development of a derivative that exhibits improved cellular activity, presumably due to a reduction in mass of about two-fold and the elimination of positively charged lysine-like residues.

Periodate-triggered cross-linking reveals Sug2/Rpt4 as the molecular target of a peptoid inhibitor of the 19S proteasome regulatory particle

This study describes the identification of the protein target of the first chemical inhibitor (RIP-1) of the 19S regulatory particle (RP) of the 26S proteasome. Periodate-triggered chemical cross-linking of DOPA-conjugated RIP-1 and the 26S proteasome identified Sug2/Rpt4, one of the six ATPases in the 19S RP as the molecular target of RIP-1. The specificity of RIP-1 for Sug2/Rpt4 was demonstrated by examining cross-linking reactions with each ATPase of the 19S RP. RIP-1 should provide a useful biological tool to probe the various biological roles of Rpt4.

Label transfer chemistry for the characterization of protein-protein interactions

A new label transfer method is presented that overcomes most of the limitations of current systems. A protein of interest is tagged with tetra-cysteine sequence (FlAsH Receptor Peptide (FRP)) that binds tightly and specifically to a chimeric molecule 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine – biotin – 4′,5′-bis(1,3,2-dithioarsolan-2-yl)fluorescein (DOPA-biotin-FlAsH). Upon brief periodate oxidation, the DOPA moiety is cross-linked to nearby surface-exposed nucleophiles. Boiling the products in excess dithiol dissolves the FlAsH-FRP interaction, resulting in transfer of the biotin tag to the partner proteins, allowing them to be identified by standard methods.

Chemistry of periodate-mediated cross-linking of 3,4-dihydroxylphenylalanine-containing molecules to proteins

Chemical cross-linking is an attractive approach to map peptide-protein and protein-protein complexes. Previously, we explored 3,4-dihydroxylphenylalanine (DOPA) as a protein cross-linking agent upon periodate oxidation (Burdine, L.; Gillette, T. G.; Lin, H.-J.; Kodadek, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 11442-11443). We report here a study on the chemistry of DOPA-protein cross-linking. First, using a peptide nucleic acid templated system, we identified the alpha-amino, epsilon-amino of Lys, imidazole of His, and thiol of Cys as functional groups capable of attacking DOPA ortho-quinone. Second, we demonstrated that periodate-induced DOPA-protein cross-linking could be carried out efficiently at neutral pH in the presence of excess aliphatic 1,2-diols such as ethylene glycol, lactose, and adenosine triphosphate. This result indicated that DOPA-protein cross-linking and 1,2-diol oxidative cleavage proceed via different mechanisms and that carbohydrates will not interfere with this process when carried out in crude cell extracts or on intact cells.

The role of the proteasomal ATPases and activator monoubiquitylation in regulating Gal4 binding to promoters

Recent studies have shown that the intersection between transcription and proteins involved in the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway encompasses both proteolytic and nonproteolytic functions. Examples of the latter type include evidence that monoubiquitylation of some transcriptional activators stimulates their activity. In addition, the proteasomal ATPases are recruited to many active promoters through binding to activators and play an important, nonproteolytic role in promoter escape and elongation. In this study, we report the discovery of a new nonproteolytic activity of the proteasome (specifically the proteasomal ATPases): the active destabilization of activator-promoter complexes. This reaction depends on the presence of an activation domain and ATP. Destabilization is inhibited in vitro and in vivo if the protein is monoubiquitylated or if ubiquitin is genetically fused to the activator. The fact that monoubiquitylated activator is resistant to the "stripping" activity of the proteasomal ATPases may explain, in part, why some activators require this modification in order to function efficiently.