Development of ion-imprinted polymers for the selective extraction of Cu(II) ions in environmental waters

Several ion-imprinted polymers (IIPs) were synthesized via bulk polymerization with Cu(II) as template ion, methacrylic acid as functional monomer, ethylene glycol dimethacrylate as crosslinking agent, and azobisisobutyronitrile as initiator in acetonitrile or methanol as porogen solvent. Non-imprinted polymers (NIPs) were similarly synthesized but without Cu(II). After grounding and sieving, the template ions were removed from IIPs particles through several cycles of elimination in 3 M HCl. All NIPs were equally subjected to this acid treatment with the exception of one NIP, called unwashed NIP. The resulting IIP/NIP particles were packed in solid phase extraction (SPE) cartridges for characterization. The SPE protocol was designed by optimizing a washing step following the sample percolation to eliminate potential interfering ions prior to the elution of Cu(II), all fractions analyzed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. The best IIP showed a high specificity (recovery of Cu(II) vs. interfering ions) and a good selectivity (retention on IIP vs. NIP). Its adsorption capacity was determined to be 63 μg g^-1. Then, a volume of 50 mL was percolated with 30 mg of IIP, thus giving rise to an enrichment factor of 24. Finally, applications to real samples (mineral and sea waters) were successfully performed. In addition, Brunauer-Emmett-Teller analyses showed that the surface area of the washed NIP was almost double that of the unwashed one (140.70 vs. 74.49 m² g^-1), demonstrating for the first time that the post-treatment of a NIP after its synthesis may have a significant impact on its porous structure, and thus need to be more precisely detailed by authors in the future papers.

Factors Affecting the Analytical Performance of Magnetic Molecularly Imprinted Polymers

During the last few years, separation techniques using molecular imprinting polymers (MIPs) have been developed, making certain improvements using magnetic properties. Compared to MIP, Magnetic molecularly imprinted polymers (MMIPs) have high selectivity in sample pre-treatment and allow for fast and easy isolation of the target analyte. Its magnetic properties and good extraction performance depend on the MMIP synthesis step, which consists of 4 steps, namely magnetite manufacture, magnetic coating using modified components, polymerization and template desorption. This review discusses the factors that will affect the performance of MMIP as a selective sorbent at each stage. MMIP, using Fe₃O₄ as a magnetite core, showed strong superparamagnetism; it was prepared using the co-precipitation method using FeCl₃·6H₂O and FeCl₂·H₂O to obtain high magnetic properties, using NH₄OH solution added for higher crystallinity. In magnetite synthesis, the use of a higher temperature and reaction time will result in a larger nanoparticle size and high magnetization saturation, while a higher pH value will result in a smaller particle size. In the modification step, the use of high amounts of oleic acid results in smaller nanoparticles; furthermore, determining the correct molar ratio between FeCl₃ and the shielding agent will also result in smaller particles. The next factor is that the proper ratio of functional monomer, cross-linker and solvent will improve printing efficiency. Thus, it will produce MMIP with high selectivity in sample pre-treatment.

Molecular imprinting polymers and their composites: a promising material for diverse applications

Molecular imprinted polymerization is considered one of the most useful preparation strategies to obtain highly selective polymeric materials called molecular imprinted polymers (MIPs).