Tailoring the cationic lipid composition of lipo-DVDMS augments the phototherapy efficiency of burn infection

Functional nanomaterials as photosensitizers or delivery systems for antibacterial photodynamic therapy

Bacterial infection is a global health problem that closely related to various diseases threatening human life. Although antibiotic therapy has been the mainstream treatment method for various bacterial infectious diseases for decades, the increasing emergence of bacterial drug resistance has brought enormous challenges to the application of antibiotics. Therefore, developing novel antibacterial strategies is of great importance. By producing reactive oxygen species (ROS) with photosensitizers (PSs) under light irradiation, antibacterial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) has emerged as a non-invasive and promising approach for treating bacterial infections without causing drug resistance. However, the insufficient therapeutic penetration, poor hydrophilicity, and poor biocompatibility of traditional PSs greatly limit the efficacy of aPDT. Recently, studies have found that nanomaterials with characteristics of favorable photocatalytic activity, surface plasmonic resonance, easy modification, and high drug loading capacity can improve the therapeutic efficacy of aPDT. In this review, we aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of the mechanism of nanomaterials-mediated aPDT and summarize the representative nanomaterials in aPDT, either as PSs or carriers for PSs. In addition, the combination of advanced nanomaterials-mediated aPDT with other therapies, including targeted therapy, gas therapy, and multidrug resistance (MDR) therapy, is reviewed. Also, the concerns and possible solutions of nanomaterials-based aPDT are discussed. Overall, this review may provide theoretical basis and inspiration for the development of nanomaterials-based aPDT.

Photodynamic therapy for treatment of burns: A system review and meta-analysis of animal study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Burns are common in both everyday life and war. Shock, infection, and organ dysfunction are major complications, among which infection is the most common and has the highest mortality rate. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of photodynamic therapy(PDT) on animals suffering from burns.

METHODS

Through searching Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, only controlled trials were collected to study the effects of PDT on animals with burns. The included studies were evaluated for methodological quality by the MINORS (Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies) assessment tool, and the data analysis software was used to analyze the data accordingly.

RESULTS

16 articles were collected between the earliest available date and August 2022. The results of the meta-analysis showed that PDT effectively reduces TNF-α and IL-6 levels in wounds, and increases bFGF and VEGF levels, PDT can also reduce bacterial colonization at the injury site, accelerate the healing of burn wounds, and improve the survival rate.

CONCLUSION

PDT has been shown to have positive effects as a treatment for animals suffering from burns. It affects the levels of cytokines, reduces bacterial counts in wounds, promotes wound healing, and improves animal survival rates.

Polymyxin B-targeted liposomal photosensitizer cures MDR A. baumannii burn infections and accelerates wound healing via M1/M2 macrophage polarization

Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter baumannii infections pose a significant challenge in burn wound management, necessitating the development of innovative therapeutic strategies. In this work, we introduced a novel polymyxin B (PMB)-targeted liposomal photosensitizer, HMME@Lipo-PMB, for precise and potent antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) against burn infections induced by MDR A. baumanni. HMME@Lipo-PMB-mediated aPDT exhibited enhanced antibacterial efficacy by specifically targeting and disrupting bacterial cell membranes, and generating increased intracellular ROS. Remarkably, even at low concentrations, this targeted approach significantly reduced bacterial viability in vitro and completely eradicated burn infections induced by MDR A. baumannii in vivo. Additionally, HMME@Lipo-PMB-mediated aPDT facilitated burn infection wound healing by modulating M1/M2 macrophage polarization. It also effectively promoted acute inflammation in the early stage, while attenuated chronic inflammation in the later stage of wound healing. This dynamic modulation promoted the formation of granulation tissue, angiogenesis, and collagen regeneration. These findings demonstrate the tremendous potential of HMME@Lipo-PMB-mediated aPDT as a promising alternative for the treatment of burn infections caused by MDR A. baumannii.

Advancing biofilm management through nanoformulation strategies: a review of dosage forms and administration routes

Biofilms are complex microbial communities formed by the attachment of bacteria or fungi to surfaces encased in a self-produced polymeric matrix. These biofilms are highly resistant to conventional antimicrobial therapies. The resistance mechanisms exhibited by biofilms include low antibiotic absorption, sluggish replication, adaptive stress response, and the formation of dormant-like phenotypes. The eradication of biofilms requires alternative strategies and approaches. Nanotechnological drug delivery systems allow excellent control over the drug chemistry, surface area, particle size, particle shape, and composition of nanostructures. Nanoformulations can enhance the efficacy of antimicrobial agents by improving their bioavailability, stability, and targeted delivery to the site of infection that helps biofilm eradication more effectively. In addition to nanoformulations, the route of administration and choice of dosage forms play a crucial role in treating biofilm infections. Systemic administration of antibiotics is effective in controlling systemic infection and sepsis associated with biofilms. Alternative routes of administration, such as inhalation, vaginal, ocular, or dermal, have been explored to target biofilm infections in specific organs. This review primarily examines the utilisation of nanoformulations in various administration routes for biofilm management. It also provides an overview of biofilms, current approaches, and the drawbacks associated with conventional methods.

Liposomes-Based Drug Delivery Systems of Anti-Biofilm Agents to Combat Bacterial Biofilm Formation

All currently approved antibiotics are being met by some degree of resistance by the bacteria they target. Biofilm formation is one of the crucial enablers of bacterial resistance, making it an important bacterial process to target for overcoming antibiotic resistance. Accordingly, several drug delivery systems that target biofilm formation have been developed. One of these systems is based on lipid-based nanocarriers (liposomes), which have shown strong efficacy against biofilms of bacterial pathogens. Liposomes come in various types, namely conventional (charged or neutral), stimuli-responsive, deformable, targeted, and stealth. This paper reviews studies employing liposomal formulations against biofilms of medically salient gram-negative and gram-positive bacterial species reported recently. When it comes to gram-negative species, liposomal formulations of various types were reported to be efficacious against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Acinetobacter baumannii, and members of the genera Klebsiella, Salmonella, Aeromonas, Serratia, Porphyromonas, and Prevotella. A range of liposomal formulations were also effective against gram-positive biofilms, including mostly biofilms of Staphylococcal strains, namely Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Staphylococcus saprophyticus subspecies bovis, followed by Streptococcal strains (pneumonia, oralis, and mutans), Cutibacterium acnes, Bacillus subtilis, Mycobacterium avium, Mycobacterium avium subsp. hominissuis, Mycobacterium abscessus, and Listeria monocytogenes biofilms. This review outlines the benefits and limitations of using liposomal formulations as means to combat different multidrug-resistant bacteria, urging the investigation of the effects of bacterial gram-stain on liposomal efficiency and the inclusion of pathogenic bacterial strains previously unstudied.

Antibacterial nanophotosensitizers in photodynamic therapy: An update

Bacterial infections constitute a major challenge of clinical medicine, particularly in specialties such as dermatology and dental medicine. Antiseptics and antibiotics are the main adjunctive therapies to anti-infective procedures in these specialties. However, antibacterial photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been introduced as a novel and promising alternative to conventional antibacterial approaches. PDT relies on the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by a photosensitizer (PS) after activation by a specific light source. Nanotechnology was later introduced to enhance the antibacterial efficacy of PS during PDT. In this review, we describe the different nanoparticles (NPs) used in PDT and their properties. Recent in vivo data of NPs in antibacterial PDT in dermatology and dental medicine and their safety concerns are also reviewed.