Rational design, synthesis and testing of novel tricyclic topoisomerase inhibitors for the treatment of bacterial infections part 2

Terpene-Functionalized Fluoroquinolones as Potential Antimicrobials: Synthesis and Properties

This study was the first to synthesize terpene-containing conjugates of fluoroquinolones, ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin, and to evaluate their antibacterial activity against gram-positive methicillin sensitive (MSSA) and methicillin resistant (MRSA) S. aureus, gram-negative P. aeruginosa as well as antifungal activity against C. albicans. The ability of obtained fluoroquinolones to inhibit S. aureus growth was found to depend upon the presence of a linker separating the bulky terpene and fluoroquinolone fragments, and this activity diminished with increasing its length. The highest activity against MSSA was demonstrated by ciprofloxacin derivatives with campholenic (MIC 1 μg/mL) and 2-(isobornan-2-yl-sulfanyl)acetyl (MIC 0.5 μg/mL) substituents. The compound with the last fragment showed high activity against MRSA (MIC 8 μg/mL). The terpene-functionalized norfloxacin derivatives generally proved to be less active than those containing ciprofloxacin fragment. Camphor-10-sulfonylamide derivative with the ciprofloxacin fragment was the only one of all compounds that showed high antifungal activity against C. albicans (8 μg/mL). The study presents data on docking fluoroquinolones to S. aureus DNA gyrase to explain the reasons for manifestation or disappearance of antibacterial activity. The cytotoxicity of fluoroquinolones that showed any antimicrobial activity was investigated against bovine primary lung cells, and they were found to be not toxic in most cases.

On drug discovery against infectious diseases and academic medicinal chemistry contributions

This perspective is an attempt to document the problems that medicinal chemists are facing in drug discovery. It is also trying to identify relevant/possible, research areas in which academics can have an impact and should thus be the subject of grant calls. Accordingly, it describes how hit discovery happens, how compounds to be screened are selected from available chemicals and the possible reasons for the recurrent paucity of useful/exploitable results reported. This is followed by the successful hit to lead stories leading to recent and original antibacterials which are, or about to be, used in human medicine. Then, illustrated considerations and suggestions are made on the possible inputs of academic medicinal chemists. This starts with the observation that discovering a “good” hit in the course of a screening campaign still rely on a lot of luck – which is within the reach of academics –, that the hit to lead process requires a lot of chemistry and that if public–private partnerships can be important throughout these stages, they are absolute requirements for clinical trials. Concerning suggestions to improve the current hit success rate, one academic input in organic chemistry would be to identify new and pertinent chemical space, design synthetic accesses to reach these and prepare the corresponding chemical libraries. Concerning hit to lead programs on a given target, if no new hits are available, previously reported leads along with new structural data can be pertinent starting points to design, prepare and assay original analogues. In conclusion, this text is an actual plea illustrating that, in many countries, academic research in medicinal chemistry should be more funded, especially in the therapeutic area neglected by the industry. At the least, such funds would provide the intensive to secure series of hopefully relevant chemical entities which appears to often lack when considering the results of academic as well as industrial screening campaigns.