Adenosine potentiates lutropin-stimulated cyclic AMP production and inhibits lutropin-induced desensitization of adenylate cyclase in rat Leydig tumour cells

Dynamic testosterone responses to near-physiological LH pulses are determined by the time pattern of prior intravenous LH infusion

The long-lived glycoprotein hormone, human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), downregulates testosterone (T) biosynthesis in vitro and in vivo in animals and humans. The degree to which short-lived pulses of pituitary luteinizing hormone (LH) do so, particularly at physiological concentrations, is not known. We test the hypothesis that continuous LH infusion compared with bolus injections of LH every 1 h or every 2 h overnight downregulates T secretory responses to a subsequent fixed template of three consecutive intravenous pulses of a physiological amount of recombinant human (rh) LH (triple stimulus). Nineteen healthy men ages 18-49 yr each underwent four separate randomly ordered overnight gonadotropin-releasing hormone-receptor antagonist treatments with superimposed intravenous infusions of saline or rhLH (1-h pulses, 2-h pulses, or continuously). Each 12-h infusion protocol was followed by the triple rhLH-pulse stimulus the next morning. During the triple stimulus, basal (nonpulsatile) as well as total (basal plus pulsatile) T secretion was higher after overnight 2- and 1-h rhLH pulses than after continuous rhLH or saline delivery. Approximate entropy, a probabilistic measure of feedforward-induced irregularity of T concentration time series, was higher after 1-h rhLH pulses than after continuous rhLH. Analytical estimation of pulsatile rhLH-T dose-response measures revealed higher T secretory sensitivity and greater rhLH potency (lower EC₅₀) after exposure to 1-h than 2-h rhLH pulses. Collectively, these data indicate that in vivo dynamics of LH-stimulated T secretion under standardized conditions in men depend on the prior time mode of LH delivery in the bloodstream.

Analytical construct of reversible desensitization of pituitary-testicular signaling: illustrative application in aging

Luteinizing hormone (LH) administered in pharmacological amounts downregulates Leydig cell steroidogenesis. Whether reversible downregulation of physiological gonadotropin drive operates in vivo is unknown. Most of the analytical models of dose-response functions that have been constructed are biased by the assumption that no downregulation exists. The present study employs a new analytical platform to quantify potential (but not required) pulsatile cycles of LH-testosterone (T) dose-response stimulation, desensitization, and recovery (pulse-by-pulse hysteresis) in 26 healthy men sampled every 10 min for 24 h. A sensitivity-downregulation hysteresis construct predicted marked hysteresis with a median time delay to LH dose-response inflection within individual T pulses of 23 min and with median T pulse onset and recovery LH sensitivities of 1.1 and 0.10 slope unit, respectively (P < 0.001). A potency-downregulation model yielded median estimates of one-half maximally stimulatory LH concentrations (EC(50) values) of 0.66 and 7.5 IU/l for onset and recovery, respectively (P < 0.001). An efficacy-downregulation formulation of hysteresis forecasts median LH efficacies of 20 and 8.3 ng·dl(-1)·min(-1) for onset and offset of T secretory burst, respectively (P = 0.002). Segmentation of the LH-T data by age suggested greater sensitivity, higher EC(50) (increased LH potency), and markedly (2.7-fold) attenuated LH efficacy in older individuals. Each of the three hysteresis models yielded a marked (P < 0.005) reduction in estimated model residual error compared with no hysteresis. In summary, model-based analyses allowing for (but not requiring) reversible pituitary-gonadal effector-response downregulation are consistent with a hypothesis of recurrent, brief cycles of LH-dependent stimulation, desensitization, and recovery of pulsatile T secretion in vivo and an age-associated reduction of LH efficacy. Prospective studies would be required to prove this aging effect.

Adenosine as substrate and receptor agonist in the ovary

In the present study the possible dual effects of adenosine as substrate and adenosine receptor agonist in rat granulosa cells, cumulus-oocyte complexes, luteal cells and ovarian membranes are discussed. Adenosine is an indispensable compound in cell energy metabolism, as precursor to cofactors, second messenger and nucleic acids. Adenosine is also an agonist to adenosine receptors. The adenosine receptor can either inhibit (A1) or stimulate (A2) adenylate cyclase. Alternatively, in some cells adenosine receptor activation is linked to other cellular events like inhibition of Ca2+ fluxes. Adenosine is taken up by isolated preovulatory granulosa and luteal cells from pregnant mare serum gonadotropin-treated immature rats, but follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) decreases the uptake by granulosa cells. Adenosine, but not the non-metabolizable adenosine analogs 5'-(N-ethyl)carboxamide-adenosine (NECA), 2-chloro-adenosine (2-Clado), N6-(R-phenyl-isopropyl)-adenosine (R-PLA) and N6-(S-phenyl-isopropyl)-adenosine (S-PLA), increase granulosa cell ATP levels. FSH and luteinizing hormone (LH) decrease granulosa cell ATP levels in the presence or absence of adenosine. It has previously been shown that FSH and LH decrease oxygen consumption by cumulus-oocyte complexes and increase their lactate production. These effects have been suggested to be due to a competition of cofactors (e.g. ADP) common to glycolysis and the respiratory chain. The fact that adenosine reverse the gonadotropin-induced effects on oxygen consumption and lactate production support this theory. Adenosine and its analogs increase cAMP accumulation in luteal and granulosa cells only in the presence of gonadotropins, and this effect is antagonized by the adenosine receptor antagonist 8-phenyl-theophylline (8-PHT). Furthermore, adenylate cyclase is stimulated by adenosine analogs in membranes from non-luteinized and luteinized ovarian membranes and in luteal cell homogenates. The effect of NECA is antagonized by 8-PHT. In the membranes, the rank order of potency was NECA greater than 2-Clado greater than R-PLA greater than S-PLA, suggesting adenosine A2 receptors. In summary, it is suggested that adenosine can act both as a substrate to intracellular metabolism and as an adenosine A2 receptor agonist in granulosa and luteal cells. A paracrine short loop positive feedback model is proposed where extracellular adenosine, derived from a gonadotropin-induced extracellular increase in cAMP and a decrease in cellular ATP, enhances gonadotropin stimulation in granulosa and luteal cells.

Evidence for A2 adenosine receptor-mediated effects on adenylate cyclase activity in rat ovarian membranes

Effects of adenosine analogues on adenylate cyclase activity in preovulatory rat ovarian membranes were studied. Adenosine analogues stimulated adenylate cyclase activity in the following rank order of potency: NECA (5'-(N-ethyl)carboxamidoadenosine) greater than 2-chloroadenosine greater than N6-(R-phenylisopropyl)-adenosine greater than N6-(S-phenylisopropyl)adenosine. The apparent EC50 for NECA was 0.28 microM. The adenosine receptor antagonist 8-phenyltheophylline (10 microM) displaced the dose-response curve for NECA to the right, increasing the EC50 for NECA about one order of magnitude. NECA also additively increased maximally FSH-stimulated adenylate cyclase activity. These results suggest that adenosine stimulates adenylate cyclase in rat ovarian membranes via adenosine receptors of the A2 type.

Similarities and differences in phorbol ester- and luteinizing-hormone-induced desensitization of rat tumour Leydig-cell adenylate cyclase

The phorbol ester 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate (TPA) was shown to mimic luteinizing hormone (LH; lutropin) in causing desensitization of LH-mediated cyclic AMP production in tumour Leydig cells. However, there were differences between LH- and TPA-induced desensitization: (1) TPA induced a more rapid effect than LH; (2) adenosine did not inhibit TPA-induced desensitization, whereas it completely inhibited the LH-induced desensitization; (3) adenylate cyclase activity in plasma membranes from TPA-desensitized cells was not decreased, whereas similar preparations from LH-desensitized cells lost their response to LH and to LH plus guanosine 5'-[beta gamma-imido]triphosphate; TPA-, but not LH-, treated cells had a decreased capacity to respond to cholera toxin and forskolin. These results indicate that LH and phorbol esters induce desensitization of adenylate cyclase in rat tumour Leydig cells by different mechanisms.

The rapid desensitization of glucagon-stimulated adenylate cyclase is a cyclic AMP-independent process that can be mimicked by hormones which stimulate inositol phospholipid metabolism

Treatment of intact hepatocytes with glucagon, TH-glucagon [( 1-N-alpha-trinitrophenylhistidine, 12-homoarginine]glucagon), angiotensin or vasopressin led to a rapid time- and dose-dependent loss of the glucagon-stimulated response of the adenylate cyclase activity seen in membrane fractions isolated from these cells. Intracellular cyclic AMP concentrations were only elevated with glucagon. All ligands were capable of causing both desensitization/loss of glucagon-stimulated adenylate cyclase activity and stimulation of inositol phospholipid metabolism in the intact hepatocytes. Maximally effective doses of angiotensin precluded any further inhibition/desensitizing action when either glucagon or TH-glucagon was subsequently added to these intact cells, as has been shown previously for the phorbol ester TPA (12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate) [Heyworth, Wilson, Gawler & Houslay (1985) FEBS Lett. 187, 196-200]. Treatment of intact hepatocytes with these various ligands caused a selective loss of the glucagon-stimulated adenylate cyclase activity in a washed membrane fraction and did not alter the basal, GTP-, NaF- and forskolin-stimulated responses. Angiotensin failed to inhibit glucagon-stimulated adenylate cyclase activity when added directly to a washed membrane fraction from control cells. Glucagon GR2 receptor-stimulated adenylate cyclase is suggested to undergo desensitization/uncoupling through a cyclic AMP-independent process, which involves the stimulation of inositol phospholipid metabolism by glucagon acting through GR1 receptors. This action can be mimicked by other hormones which act on the liver to stimulate inositol phospholipid metabolism. As the phorbol ester TPA also mimics this process, it is proposed that protein kinase C activation plays a pivotal role in the molecular mechanism of desensitization of glucagon-stimulated adenylate cyclase. The site of the lesion in desensitization is shown to be at the level of coupling between the glucagon receptor and the stimulatory guanine nucleotide regulatory protein Gs, and it is suggested that one or both of these components may provide a target for phosphorylation by protein kinase C.

Inhibition by adenosine of ACTH-stimulated adenylate cyclase and steroidogenesis in the adrenal cortex

Effects of adenosine analogs on ACTH-stimulated adenylate cyclase activity and steroidogenesis in rat adrenocortical glands have been studied. Adenosine analogs inhibited ACTH-stimulated adenylate cyclase activity by a GTP-dependent process. Methylxanthines reversed the inhibitory effect of N6-phenyl-isopropyl-adenosine (PIA), but not of 2',5'-dideoxy-adenosine. These results suggest that adenosine negatively regulates the stimulation of adenylate cyclase by ACTH at the external and the internal site of the membrane. The inhibitory effect of PIA on ACTH-stimulated steroidogenesis by isolated cells was antagonized by methylxanthines. PIA also inhibited steroidogenesis induced by dibutyryl cAMP, suggesting an inhibitory action of the nucleoside distal to the cAMP system. These results suggest the presence of a common site located in the external membrane for adenosine which subsequently mediates two independent processes, one is negatively coupled to the adenylate cyclase and the other to steroidogenesis for negative feedback controls of the adrenal cortex.