Learning to read and write in evolution: from static pseudoenzymes and pseudosignalers to dynamic gear shifters

On paradoxes between optimal growth, metabolic control analysis, and flux balance analysis

In Microbiology it is often assumed that growth rate is maximal. This may be taken to suggest that the dependence of the growth rate on every enzyme activity is at the top of an inverse-parabolic function, i.e. that all flux control coefficients should equal zero. This might seem to imply that the sum of these flux control coefficients equals zero. According to the summation law of Metabolic Control Analysis (MCA) the sum of flux control coefficients should equal 1 however. And in Flux Balance Analysis (FBA) catabolism is often limited by a hard bound, causing catabolism to fully control the fluxes, again in apparent contrast with a flux control coefficient of zero. Here we resolve these paradoxes (apparent contradictions) in an analysis that uses the 'Edinburgh pathway', the 'Amsterdam pathway', as well as a generic metabolic network providing the building blocks or Gibbs energy for microbial growth. We review and show that (i) optimization depends on so-called enzyme control coefficients rather than the 'catalytic control coefficients' of MCA's summation law, (ii) when optimization occurs at fixed total protein, the former differ from the latter to the extent that they may all become equal to zero in the optimum state, (iii) in more realistic scenarios of optimization where catalytically inert biomass is compensating or maintenance metabolism is taken into consideration, the optimum enzyme concentrations should not be expected to equal those that maximize the specific growth rate, (iv) optimization may be in terms of yield rather than specific growth rate, which resolves the paradox because the sum of catalytic control coefficients on yield equals 0, (v) FBA effectively maximizes growth yield, and for yield the summation law states 0 rather than 1, thereby removing the paradox, (vi) furthermore, FBA then comes more often to a 'hard optimum' defined by a maximum catabolic flux and a catabolic-enzyme control coefficient of 1. The trade-off between maintenance metabolism and growth is highlighted as worthy of further analysis.

Gear Shifting in Biological Energy Transduction

Confronted with thermodynamically adverse output processes, free-energy transducers may shift to lower gears, thereby reducing output per unit input. This option is well known for inanimate machines such as automobiles, but unappreciated in biology. The present study extends existing non-equilibrium thermodynamic principles to underpin biological gear shifting and identify possible mechanisms. It shows that gear shifting differs from altering the degree of coupling and that living systems may use it to optimize their performance: microbial growth is ultimately powered by the Gibbs energy of catabolism, which is partially transformed into Gibbs energy ('output force') in the ATP that is produced. If this output force is high, the cell may turn to a catabolic pathway with a lower ATP stoichiometry. Notwithstanding the reduced stoichiometry, the ATP synthesis flux may then actually increase as compared to that in a system without gear shift, in which growth might come to a halt. A 'variomatic' gear switching strategy should be optimal, explaining why organisms avail themselves of multiple catabolic pathways, as these enable them to shift gears when the growing gets tough.

Cyclin/Forkhead-mediated coordination of cyclin waves: an autonomous oscillator rationalizing the quantitative model of Cdk control for budding yeast

Networks of interacting molecules organize topology, amount, and timing of biological functions. Systems biology concepts required to pin down 'network motifs' or 'design principles' for time-dependent processes have been developed for the cell division cycle, through integration of predictive computer modeling with quantitative experimentation. A dynamic coordination of sequential waves of cyclin-dependent kinases (cyclin/Cdk) with the transcription factors network offers insights to investigate how incompatible processes are kept separate in time during the eukaryotic cell cycle. Here this coordination is discussed for the Forkhead transcription factors in light of missing gaps in the current knowledge of cell cycle control in budding yeast. An emergent design principle is proposed where cyclin waves are synchronized by a cyclin/Cdk-mediated feed-forward regulation through the Forkhead as a transcriptional timer. This design is rationalized by the bidirectional interaction between mitotic cyclins and the Forkhead transcriptional timer, resulting in an autonomous oscillator that may be instrumental for a well-timed progression throughout the cell cycle. The regulation centered around the cyclin/Cdk-Forkhead axis can be pivotal to timely coordinate cell cycle dynamics, thereby to actuate the quantitative model of Cdk control.

Pseudophosphatase MK-STYX: the atypical member of the MAP kinase phosphatases

The regulation of the phosphorylation of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) is essential for cellular processes such as proliferation, differentiation, survival, and death. Mutations within the MAPK signaling cascades are implicated in diseases such as cancer, neurodegenerative disorders, arthritis, obesity, and diabetes. MAPK phosphorylation is controlled by an intricate balance between MAPK kinases (enzymes that add phosphate groups) and MAPK phosphatases (MKPs) (enzymes that remove phosphate groups). MKPs are complex negative regulators of the MAPK pathway that control the amplitude and spatiotemporal regulation of MAPKs. MK-STYX (MAPK phosphoserine/threonine/tyrosine-binding protein) is a member of the MKP subfamily, which lacks the critical histidine and nucleophilic cysteine residues in the active site required for catalysis. MK-STYX does not influence the phosphorylation status of MAPK, but even so it adds to the complexity of signal transduction cascades as a signaling regulator. This review highlights the function of MK-STYX, providing insight into MK-STYX as a signal regulating molecule in the stress response, HDAC 6 dynamics, apoptosis, and neurite differentiation.

Clb3-centered regulations are recurrent across distinct parameter regions in minimal autonomous cell cycle oscillator designs

Some biological networks exhibit oscillations in their components to convert stimuli to time-dependent responses. The eukaryotic cell cycle is such a case, being governed by waves of cyclin-dependent kinase (cyclin/Cdk) activities that rise and fall with specific timing and guarantee its timely occurrence. Disruption of cyclin/Cdk oscillations could result in dysfunction through reduced cell division. Therefore, it is of interest to capture properties of network designs that exhibit robust oscillations. Here we show that a minimal yeast cell cycle network is able to oscillate autonomously, and that cyclin/Cdk-mediated positive feedback loops (PFLs) and Clb3-centered regulations sustain cyclin/Cdk oscillations, in known and hypothetical network designs. We propose that Clb3-mediated coordination of cyclin/Cdk waves reconciles checkpoint and oscillatory cell cycle models. Considering the evolutionary conservation of the cyclin/Cdk network across eukaryotes, we hypothesize that functional ("healthy") phenotypes require the capacity to oscillate autonomously whereas dysfunctional (potentially "diseased") phenotypes may lack this capacity.

The role of pseudophosphatases as signaling regulators

Pseudophosphatases are atypical members of the protein tyrosine phosphatase superfamily. Mutations within their catalytic signature motif render them catalytically inactive. Despite this lack of catalytic function, pseudophosphatases have been implicated in various diseases such as Charcot Marie-Tooth disorder, cancer, metabolic disorder, and obesity. Moreover, they have roles in various signaling networks such as spermatogenesis, apoptosis, stress response, tumorigenesis, and neurite differentiation. This review highlights the roles of pseudophosphatases as essential regulators in signaling cascades, providing insight into the function of these catalytically inactive enzymes.