Masked Speech Recognition and Reading Ability in School-Age Children: Is There a Relationship?

Predictors of Susceptibility to Noise and Speech Masking Among School-Age Children With Hearing Loss or Typical Hearing

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate effects of masker type and hearing group on the relationship between school-age children's speech recognition and age, vocabulary, working memory, and selective attention. This study also explored effects of masker type and hearing group on the time course of maturation of masked speech recognition.

DESIGN

Participants included 31 children with normal hearing (CNH) and 41 children with mild to severe bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (CHL), between 6.7 and 13 years of age. Children with hearing aids used their personal hearing aids throughout testing. Audiometric thresholds and standardized measures of vocabulary, working memory, and selective attention were obtained from each child, along with masked sentence recognition thresholds in a steady state, speech-spectrum noise (SSN) and in a two-talker speech masker (TTS). Aided audibility through children's hearing aids was calculated based on the Speech Intelligibility Index (SII) for all children wearing hearing aids. Linear mixed effects models were used to examine the contribution of group, age, vocabulary, working memory, and attention to individual differences in speech recognition thresholds in each masker. Additional models were constructed to examine the role of aided audibility on masked speech recognition in CHL. Finally, to explore the time course of maturation of masked speech perception, linear mixed effects models were used to examine interactions between age, masker type, and hearing group as predictors of masked speech recognition.

RESULTS

Children's thresholds were higher in TTS than in SSN. There was no interaction of hearing group and masker type. CHL had higher thresholds than CNH in both maskers. In both hearing groups and masker types, children with better vocabularies had lower thresholds. An interaction of hearing group and attention was observed only in the TTS. Among CNH, attention predicted thresholds in TTS. Among CHL, vocabulary and aided audibility predicted thresholds in TTS. In both maskers, thresholds decreased as a function of age at a similar rate in CNH and CHL.

CONCLUSIONS

The factors contributing to individual differences in speech recognition differed as a function of masker type. In TTS, the factors contributing to individual difference in speech recognition further differed as a function of hearing group. Whereas attention predicted variance for CNH in TTS, vocabulary and aided audibility predicted variance in CHL. CHL required a more favorable signal to noise ratio (SNR) to recognize speech in TTS than in SSN (mean = +1 dB in TTS, -3 dB in SSN). We posit that failures in auditory stream segregation limit the extent to which CHL can recognize speech in a speech masker. Larger sample sizes or longitudinal data are needed to characterize the time course of maturation of masked speech perception in CHL.

Individual differences in speech-on-speech masking are correlated with cognitive and visual task performance

Individual differences in spatial tuning for masked target speech identification were determined using maskers that varied in type and proximity to the target source. The maskers were chosen to produce three strengths of informational masking (IM): high [same-gender, speech-on-speech (SOS) masking], intermediate (the same masker speech time-reversed), and low (speech-shaped, speech-envelope-modulated noise). Typical for this task, individual differences increased as IM increased, while overall performance decreased. To determine the extent to which auditory performance might generalize to another sensory modality, a comparison visual task was also implemented. Visual search time was measured for identifying a cued object among "clouds" of distractors that were varied symmetrically in proximity to the target. The visual maskers also were chosen to produce three strengths of an analog of IM based on feature similarities between the target and maskers. Significant correlations were found for overall auditory and visual task performance, and both of these measures were correlated with an index of general cognitive reasoning. Overall, the findings provide qualified support for the proposition that the ability of an individual to solve IM-dominated tasks depends on cognitive mechanisms that operate in common across sensory modalities.

Audiovisual Enhancement of Speech Perception in Noise by School-Age Children Who Are Hard of Hearing

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to examine age- and hearing-related differences in school-age children's benefit from visual speech cues. The study addressed three questions: (1) Do age and hearing loss affect degree of audiovisual (AV) speech enhancement in school-age children? (2) Are there age- and hearing-related differences in the mechanisms underlying AV speech enhancement in school-age children? (3) What cognitive and linguistic variables predict individual differences in AV benefit among school-age children?

DESIGN

Forty-eight children between 6 and 13 years of age (19 with mild to severe sensorineural hearing loss; 29 with normal hearing) and 14 adults with normal hearing completed measures of auditory and AV syllable detection and/or sentence recognition in a two-talker masker type and a spectrally matched noise. Children also completed standardized behavioral measures of receptive vocabulary, visuospatial working memory, and executive attention. Mixed linear modeling was used to examine effects of modality, listener group, and masker on sentence recognition accuracy and syllable detection thresholds. Pearson correlations were used to examine the relationship between individual differences in children's AV enhancement (AV-auditory-only) and age, vocabulary, working memory, executive attention, and degree of hearing loss.

RESULTS

Significant AV enhancement was observed across all tasks, masker types, and listener groups. AV enhancement of sentence recognition was similar across maskers, but children with normal hearing exhibited less AV enhancement of sentence recognition than adults with normal hearing and children with hearing loss. AV enhancement of syllable detection was greater in the two-talker masker than the noise masker, but did not vary significantly across listener groups. Degree of hearing loss positively correlated with individual differences in AV benefit on the sentence recognition task in noise, but not on the detection task. None of the cognitive and linguistic variables correlated with individual differences in AV enhancement of syllable detection or sentence recognition.

CONCLUSIONS

Although AV benefit to syllable detection results from the use of visual speech to increase temporal expectancy, AV benefit to sentence recognition requires that an observer extracts phonetic information from the visual speech signal. The findings from this study suggest that all listener groups were equally good at using temporal cues in visual speech to detect auditory speech, but that adults with normal hearing and children with hearing loss were better than children with normal hearing at extracting phonetic information from the visual signal and/or using visual speech information to access phonetic/lexical representations in long-term memory. These results suggest that standard, auditory-only clinical speech recognition measures likely underestimate real-world speech recognition skills of children with mild to severe hearing loss.

Extended high-frequency hearing and head orientation cues benefit children during speech-in-speech recognition

While the audible frequency range for humans spans approximately 20 Hz to 20 kHz, children display enhanced sensitivity relative to adults when detecting extended high frequencies (frequencies above 8 kHz; EHFs), as indicated by better pure tone thresholds. The impact that this increased hearing sensitivity to EHFs may have on children's speech recognition has not been established. One context in which EHF hearing may be particularly important for children is when recognizing speech in the presence of competing talkers. In the present study, we examined the extent to which school-age children (ages 5-17 years) with normal hearing were able to benefit from EHF cues when recognizing sentences in a two-talker speech masker. Two filtering conditions were tested: all stimuli were either full band or were low-pass filtered at 8 kHz to remove EHFs. Given that EHF energy emission in speech is highly dependent on head orientation of the talker (i.e., radiation becomes more directional with increasing frequency), two masker head angle conditions were tested: both co-located maskers were facing 45°, or both were facing 60° relative to the listener. The results demonstrated that regardless of age, children performed better when EHFs were present. In addition, a small change in masker head orientation also impacted performance, with better recognition at 60° compared to 45°. These findings suggest that EHF energy in the speech signal above 8 kHz is beneficial for children in complex listening situations. The magnitude of benefit from EHF cues and talker head orientation cues did not differ between children and adults. Therefore, while EHFs were beneficial for children as young as 5 years of age, children's generally better EHF hearing relative to adults did not provide any additional benefit.

Effects of Monaural Asymmetry and Target-Masker Similarity on Binaural Advantage in Children and Adults With Normal Hearing

Purpose For colocated targets and maskers, binaural listening typically offers a small but significant advantage over monaural listening. This study investigated how monaural asymmetry and target-masker similarity may limit binaural advantage in adults and children. Method Ten Mandarin-speaking Chinese adults (aged 22-27 years) and 12 children (aged 7-14 years) with normal hearing participated in the study. Monaural and binaural speech recognition thresholds (SRTs) were adaptively measured for colocated competing speech. The target-masker sex was the same or different. Performance was measured using headphones for three listening conditions: left ear, right ear, and both ears. Binaural advantage was calculated relative to the poorer or better ear. Results Mean SRTs were significantly lower for adults than children. When the target-masker sex was the same, SRTs were significantly lower with the better ear than with the poorer ear or both ears (p < .05). When the target-masker sex was different, SRTs were significantly lower with the better ear or both ears than with the poorer ear (p < .05). Children and adults similarly benefitted from target-masker sex differences. Substantial monaural asymmetry was observed, but the effects of asymmetry on binaural advantage were similar between adults and children. Monaural asymmetry was significantly correlated with binaural advantage relative to the poorer ear (p = .004), but not to the better ear (p = .056). Conclusions Binaural listening may offer little advantage (or even a disadvantage) over monaural listening with the better ear, especially when competing talkers have similar vocal characteristics. Monaural asymmetry appears to limit binaural advantage in listeners with normal hearing, similar to observations in listeners with hearing impairment. While language development may limit perception of competing speech, it does not appear to limit the effects of monaural asymmetry or target-masker sex on binaural advantage.

Masked English Speech Recognition Performance in Younger and Older Spanish-English Bilingual and English Monolingual Children

Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare masked English speech recognition thresholds between Spanish-English bilingual and English monolingual children and to evaluate effects of age, maternal education, and English receptive language abilities on individual differences in masked speech recognition. Method Forty-three Spanish-English bilingual children and 42 English monolingual children completed an English sentence recognition task in 2 masker conditions: (a) speech-shaped noise and (b) 2-talker English speech. Two age groups of children, younger (5-6 years) and older (9-10 years), were tested. The predictors of masked speech recognition performance were evaluated using 2 mixed-effects regression models. In the 1st model, fixed effects were age group (younger children vs. older children), language group (bilingual vs. monolingual), and masker type (speech-shaped noise vs. 2-talker speech). In the 2nd model, the fixed effects of receptive English vocabulary scores and maternal education level were also included. Results Younger children performed more poorly than older children, but no significant difference in masked speech recognition was observed between bilingual and monolingual children for either age group when English proficiency and maternal education were also included in the model. English language abilities fell within age-appropriate norms for both groups, but individual children with larger receptive vocabularies in English tended to show better recognition; this effect was stronger for younger children than for older children. Speech reception thresholds for all children were lower in the speech-shaped noise masker than in the 2-talker speech masker. Conclusions Regardless of age, similar masked speech recognition was observed for Spanish-English bilingual and English monolingual children tested in this study when receptive English language abilities were accounted for. Receptive English vocabulary scores were associated with better masked speech recognition performance for both bilinguals and monolinguals, with a stronger relationship observed for younger children than older children. Further investigation involving a Spanish-dominant bilingual sample is warranted given the high English language proficiency of children included in this study.

Psychometric function slope for speech-in-noise and speech-in-speech: Effects of development and aging

Masked sentence recognition was evaluated in normal-hearing children (8.8-10.5 years), young adults (18-28 years), and older adults (60-71 years). Consistent with published data, speech recognition thresholds were poorer for young children and older adults than for young adults, particularly when the masker was composed of speech. Psychometric function slopes were steeper for young children and older adults than for young adults when the masker was two-talker speech, but not when it was speech-shaped noise. Multiple factors are implicated in the age effects observed for speech-in-speech recognition at low signal-to-noise ratios.