Effect of Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Dysphagia After Lateral Medullary Infarction: A Case Report

Enteric neuropathy and the vagus nerve: Therapeutic implications

Enteric neuropathies are characterized by abnormalities of gut innervation, which includes the enteric nervous system, inducing severe gut dysmotility among other dysfunctions. Most of the gastrointestinal tract is innervated by the vagus nerve, the efferent branches of which have close interconnections with the enteric nervous system and whose afferents are distributed throughout the different layers of the digestive wall. The vagus nerve is a key element of the autonomic nervous system, involved in the stress response, at the interface of the microbiota-gut-brain axis, has anti-inflammatory and prokinetic properties, modulates intestinal permeability, and has a significant capacity of plasticity and regeneration. Targeting these properties of the vagus nerve, with vagus nerve stimulation (or non-stimulation/ pharmacological methods), could be of interest in the therapeutic management of enteric neuropathies.

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation for gastrointestinal motility disorders

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Gastrointestinal (GI) dysmotility is categorized by muscle or nerve dysfunctions in any portion of the GI tract, which leads to abnormalities in GI motor and sensory function. Symptoms may vary depending on the organ affected and can be debilitating. Treatment usually involves diet and lifestyle changes. Pharmacotherapy is limited in effectiveness with various side effects. Transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES), a noninvasive, needleless technique that provides electrical stimulation using cutaneous non-needle electrodes, has become increasingly popular. It has been shown to be beneficial in treating GI motility disorders.

METHODS

This review paper navigates through the different TES techniques, including transcutaneous peripheral nerve (vagal/sacral/tibial nerves) electrical stimulation, transcutaneous electrical acustimulation (stimulation via acupuncture point), transcutaneous interferential current therapy, and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.

KEY RESULTS

As we delve deeper, we explore the promising effects of TES on dysphagia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, functional dyspepsia, gastroparesis, postoperative ileus, constipation, and irritable bowel syndrome. The literature at hand speaks volumes about the therapeutic prowess of this noninvasive technique.

CONCLUSION & INFERENCES

The time is ripe to evaluate further the full therapeutic potential of TES, a noninvasive, nonpharmaceutical, nonsurgical, and home-based self-administrative technique in managing GI motility disorders.

Research advances in the application of vagus nerve electrical stimulation in ischemic stroke

Stroke seriously endangers human well-being and brings a severe burden to family and society. Different post-stroke dysfunctions result in an impaired ability to perform activities of daily living. Standard rehabilitative therapies may not meet the requirements for functional improvement after a stroke; thus, alternative approaches need to be proposed. Currently, vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is clinically applied for the treatment of epilepsy, depression, cluster headache and migraine, while its treatment of various dysfunctions after an ischemic stroke is still in the clinical research stage. Recent studies have confirmed that VNS has neuroprotective effects in animal models of transient and permanent focal cerebral ischemia, and that its combination with rehabilitative training significantly improves upper limb motor dysfunction and dysphagia. In addition, vagus-related anatomical structures and neurotransmitters are closely implicated in memory–cognition enhancement processes, suggesting that VNS is promising as a potential treatment for cognitive dysfunction after an ischemic stroke. In this review, we outline the current status of the application of VNS (invasive and non-invasive) in diverse functional impairments after an ischemic stroke, followed by an in-depth discussion of the underlying mechanisms of its mediated neuroprotective effects. Finally, we summarize the current clinical implementation challenges and adverse events of VNS and put forward some suggestions for its future research direction. Research on VNS for ischemic stroke has reached a critical stage. Determining how to achieve the clinical transformation of this technology safely and effectively is important, and more animal and clinical studies are needed to clarify its therapeutic mechanism.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation versus transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation in post stroke dysphagia: A clinical randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of high-frequency repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) applied contralesionally versus transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation (TNES) in acute post-stroke dysphagic patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A randomized, parallel, comparative, controlled trial was conducted on patients with acute ischemic stroke who were admitted to our department. Fifteen patients received rTMS, 15 patients received TNES, and 15 patients were recruited as a control group. Between the second and tenth days after a stroke, patients were enrolled. The study and follow-up periods were completed by all patients.

RESULTS

Among the screened patients, 45 (31.47%) right-handed patients were diagnosed with post-stroke dysphagia with a mean age of 60.53 ± 8.23 years. Immediately after intervention both rTMS and TNES groups significantly improve the swallowing disturbance questionnaire (SDQ) and penetration aspiration scale (PAS), compared to the control (p < 0.001 and p = 0.027), respectively. rTMS was more effective than TNES in reducing SDQ and PAS (p < 0.05). rTMS and TNES improved the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale (YPRSRS) significantly (p = 0.002); however, their efficacy was comparable (p > 0.05). A significant (p < 0.001) strong negative correlation was observed between the grade of weakness and all scores.

CONCLUSION

Our findings showed that high-frequency rTMS and TNES effectively improved the clinical condition of acute post-stroke dysphagic patients in terms of swallowing disturbance assessed by SDQ, pharyngeal residue assessed by YPRSRS, and the severity of penetration and aspiration events evaluated by PAS, compared to the controls. The outcomes of high-frequency rTMS were more favorable than those of TNES in terms of SDQ and PAS.

Multi-Target and Multi-Session Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Patients With Prolonged Disorders of Consciousness: A Controlled Study

Objectives: To investigate the effect of multi-session transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the prefrontal area, left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), and bilateral fronto-temporo-parietal cortices (FTPCs) in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness (DOC) and to examine the altered cortical interconnections using non-linear electroencephalography (EEG).

Methods: In this open-label controlled study, conventional treatments were implemented in both the control and tDCS groups, together with 80 tDCS sessions only in the tDCS group. The order of tDCS targets was as follows: prefrontal area, left FTPC, right FTPC, and left DLPFC. The Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) and non-linear EEG index were evaluated before and after the treatment. Additionally, the modified Glasgow Outcome Scale (mGOS) was used as a follow-up evaluation at 12 months after the disease onset.

Results: The CRS-R improved significantly in both groups after the treatment. However, the CRS-R and mGOS were more significantly improved in the tDCS group than in the control group. Among the cross approximate entropy (C-ApEn) indices, the local C_A-P_A and C_A-F_A under the affected painful stimulus condition and all local and remote indices of the unaffected side under the unaffected painful stimulus condition were significantly higher in the tDCS group than in the control group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that group and type were the main relevant factors based on mGOS improvement. Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that group, C_A-F_A, and C_U-MT_U were the main relevant factors based on CRS-R improvement under the affected painful stimulus conditions, whereas only C_U-MT_U and C_U-FP_U were relevant under the unaffected painful stimulus condition.

Conclusion: Multi-target and multi-session tDCS could improve the cortical connections between the primary sensorimotor and frontal cortices of the affected hemisphere and the prefrontal-parietal and temporo-parietal associative cortical networks of the unaffected hemisphere. Thus, this tDCS protocol may be used as an add-on treatment for prolonged DOC.