1
|
Yoon YS, Jaisinghani P, Goldsworthy R. Effect of Realistic Test Conditions on Perception of Speech, Music, and Binaural Cues in Normal-Hearing Listeners. Am J Audiol 2023; 32:170-181. [PMID: 36580493 PMCID: PMC10166190 DOI: 10.1044/2022_aja-22-00143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Revised: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of online testing in a quiet room for three auditory perception experiments in normal-hearing listeners: speech, music, and binaural cue. METHOD Under Experiment 1, sentence perception was measured using fixed signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs: +10 dB, 0 dB, and -10 dB) and using adaptive speech reception threshold (SRT) procedures. The correct scores were compared between quiet room and soundproof booth listening environments. Experiment 2 was designed to compare melodic contour identification between the two listening environments. Melodic contour identification was assessed with 1, 2, and 4 semitone spacings. Under Experiment 3, interaural level difference (ILD) and interaural time differences (ITD) were measured as a function of carrier frequency. For both measures, two modulated tones (400-ms duration and 100-Hz modulation rate) were sequentially presented through headphones to both ears, and subjects were asked to indicate whether the sound moved to the left or right ear. The measured ITD and ILD were then compared between the two listening environments. RESULTS There were no significant differences in any outcome measures (SNR- and SRT-based speech perception, melodic contour identification, and ITD/ILD) between the two listening environments. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that normal-hearing listeners may not require a controlled listening environment in any of the three auditory assessments. As comparable data can be obtained via the online testing tool, using the online auditory experiments is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang-Soo Yoon
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Baylor University, Waco, TX
| | | | - Raymond Goldsworthy
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Parker A, Skoe E, Tecoulesco L, Naigles L. A Home-Based Approach to Auditory Brainstem Response Measurement: Proof-of-Concept and Practical Guidelines. Semin Hear 2022; 43:177-196. [PMID: 36313050 PMCID: PMC9605808 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1756163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Broad-scale neuroscientific investigations of diverse human populations are difficult to implement. This is because the primary neuroimaging methods (magnetic resonance imaging, electroencephalography [EEG]) historically have not been portable, and participants may be unable or unwilling to travel to test sites. Miniaturization of EEG technologies has now opened the door to neuroscientific fieldwork, allowing for easier access to under-represented populations. Recent efforts to conduct auditory neuroscience outside a laboratory setting are reviewed and then an in-home technique for recording auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) and frequency-following responses (FFRs) in a home setting is introduced. As a proof of concept, we have conducted two in-home electrophysiological studies: one in 27 children aged 6 to 16 years (13 with autism spectrum disorder) and another in 12 young adults aged 18 to 27 years, using portable electrophysiological equipment to record ABRs and FFRs to click and speech stimuli, spanning rural and urban and multiple homes and testers. We validate our fieldwork approach by presenting waveforms and data on latencies and signal-to-noise ratio. Our findings demonstrate the feasibility and utility of home-based ABR/FFR techniques, paving the course for larger fieldwork investigations of populations that are difficult to test or recruit. We conclude this tutorial with practical tips and guidelines for recording ABRs and FFRs in the field and discuss possible clinical and research applications of this approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Parker
- Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut
- Connecticut Institute for Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
| | - Erika Skoe
- Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut
- Connecticut Institute for Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut
- Cognitive Sciences Program, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut
| | - Lee Tecoulesco
- Cognitive Sciences Program, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut
| | - Letitia Naigles
- Connecticut Institute for Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut
- Cognitive Sciences Program, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Peng ZE, Waz S, Buss E, Shen Y, Richards V, Bharadwaj H, Stecker GC, Beim JA, Bosen AK, Braza MD, Diedesch AC, Dorey CM, Dykstra AR, Gallun FJ, Goldsworthy RL, Gray L, Hoover EC, Ihlefeld A, Koelewijn T, Kopun JG, Mesik J, Shub DE, Venezia JH. FORUM: Remote testing for psychological and physiological acoustics. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2022; 151:3116. [PMID: 35649891 PMCID: PMC9305596 DOI: 10.1121/10.0010422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2021] [Revised: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 04/22/2022] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
Acoustics research involving human participants typically takes place in specialized laboratory settings. Listening studies, for example, may present controlled sounds using calibrated transducers in sound-attenuating or anechoic chambers. In contrast, remote testing takes place outside of the laboratory in everyday settings (e.g., participants' homes). Remote testing could provide greater access to participants, larger sample sizes, and opportunities to characterize performance in typical listening environments at the cost of reduced control of environmental conditions, less precise calibration, and inconsistency in attentional state and/or response behaviors from relatively smaller sample sizes and unintuitive experimental tasks. The Acoustical Society of America Technical Committee on Psychological and Physiological Acoustics launched the Task Force on Remote Testing (https://tcppasa.org/remotetesting/) in May 2020 with goals of surveying approaches and platforms available to support remote testing and identifying challenges and considerations for prospective investigators. The results of this task force survey were made available online in the form of a set of Wiki pages and summarized in this report. This report outlines the state-of-the-art of remote testing in auditory-related research as of August 2021, which is based on the Wiki and a literature search of papers published in this area since 2020, and provides three case studies to demonstrate feasibility during practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Z Ellen Peng
- Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, Nebraska 68131, USA
| | - Sebastian Waz
- University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, USA
| | - Emily Buss
- The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, USA
| | - Yi Shen
- University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
| | | | | | | | - Jordan A Beim
- University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA
| | - Adam K Bosen
- Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, Nebraska 68131, USA
| | - Meredith D Braza
- The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, USA
| | - Anna C Diedesch
- Western Washington University, Bellingham, Washington 98225, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Lincoln Gray
- James Madison University, Harrisburg, Virginia 22807, USA
| | - Eric C Hoover
- University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA
| | - Antje Ihlefeld
- Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA
| | | | - Judy G Kopun
- Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, Nebraska 68131, USA
| | - Juraj Mesik
- University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA
| | - Daniel E Shub
- Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland 20814, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rauterkus G, Moncrieff D, Stewart G, Skoe E. Baseline, retest, and post-injury profiles of auditory neural function in collegiate football players. Int J Audiol 2021; 60:650-662. [PMID: 33439060 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2020.1860261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Recent retrospective studies report differences in auditory neurophysiology between concussed athletes and uninjured controls using the frequency-following response (FFR). Adopting a prospective design in college football players, we compared FFRs before and after a concussion and evaluated test-retest reliability in non-concussed teammates. DESIGN Testing took place in a locker room. We analysed the FFR to the fundamental frequency (F0) (FFR-F0) of a speech stimulus, previously identified as a potential concussion biomarker. Baseline FFRs were obtained during the football pre-season. In athletes diagnosed with concussions during the season, FFRs were measured days after injury and compared to pre-season baseline. In uninjured controls, comparisons were made between pre- and post-season. STUDY SAMPLE Participants were Tulane University football athletes (n = 65). RESULTS In concussed athletes, there was a significant group-level decrease in FFR-F0 from baseline (26% decrease on average). By contrast, the control group's change from baseline was not statistically significant, and comparisons of pre- and post-season had good repeatability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.75). CONCLUSIONS Results converge with previous work to evince suppressed neural function to the FFR-F0 following concussion. This preliminary study paves the way for larger-scale clinical evaluation of the specificity and reliability of the FFR as a concussion diagnostic.HighlightsThis prospective study reveals suppressed neural responses to sound in concussed athletes compared to baseline.Neural responses to sound show good repeatability in uninjured athletes tested in a locker-room setting.Results support the feasibility of recording frequency-following responses in non-laboratory conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grant Rauterkus
- Center for Sport, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Deborah Moncrieff
- School of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Gregory Stewart
- Department of Orthopaedics, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Erika Skoe
- Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Institute for the Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|