Voice Handicap Index Changes After Microflap Surgery for Benign Vocal Fold Lesions Are Not Associated With Recommended Absolute Voice Rest Duration

Seven Days of Voice Rest Post-phonosurgery Is Not Better than 3 days: A Prospective Randomized Short-term Outcome Study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to compare the short-term effect of 7 versus 3 days of voice rest (VR) on objective vocal (acoustic) parameters following phonosurgery.

METHODS

A prospective randomized study conducted at a tertiary referral medical center. Patients with vocal fold nodules, polyps, or cysts and scheduled for phonosurgery were recruited from the Voice Clinic. They were randomized into groups of 7- or 3-day postoperative VR periods and their voices were recorded preoperatively and at 4-week postoperatively. A mixed linear model statistical analysis (MLMSA) was used to compare pre- and postoperative jitter, shimmer, harmonic-to-noise ratio, and maximum phonation time between the two groups.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients were recruited, but only 34 fully complied with the study protocol, and their data were included in the final analysis (19 males, 20 females; mean age: 40.6 years; 17 patients in the 7-day VR group and 16 in the 3-day VR group). The groups were comparable in age, sex, and type of vocal lesion distribution. The preoperative MLMSA showed no significant group differences in the tested vocal parameters. Both groups exhibited significant (p < 0.05) and comparable improvement in all vocal parameters at postoperative week 4.

CONCLUSIONS

A VR duration of 7 days showed no greater benefit on the examined vocal parameters than the 3-day protocol 4-week postoperatively. Our results suggest that a 3-day VR regimen can be followed by patients who undergo phonosurgery without compromising the vocal results. Larger-scale and longer-duration studies are needed to confirm our findings.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2 Laryngoscope, 134:4661-4666, 2024.

Is Postoperative Voice Rest Unnecessary? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Voice Rest Recommendation Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Voice rest (VR) is widely recommended after microlaryngeal surgery to facilitate recovery and improve voice outcomes. Our study is the first systematic review and meta-analysis summarizing the impact of postoperative absolute voice rest (AVR) and no voice rest (NVR) instructions on voice outcomes.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched using "voice rest laryngeal surgery" and "postoperative voice rest" for articles published before December 2022. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I and RoB2 tools. Meta-analysis using a random effects model was performed for studies comparing Voice Handicap Index (VHI-10) outcomes between NVR and AVR. Analysis was performed in R Studio.

RESULTS

In total, 255 articles were reviewed, 24 underwent full-text screening, and nine met inclusion criteria. Four randomized control trials (RCT) and one retrospective review compared AVR durations (range: 2-10days). Four studies (two cohort, one cross-sectional, and one RCT) compared AVR to NVR. All studies had risk of bias (ROBINS-I: two moderate, two serious; RoB2: five with concerns). Comparing AVR durations, two found no difference between short and long duration, while two reported improved outcomes for the short cohort. In studies comparing AVR to NVR, all concluded no significant difference in outcomes. Pooled analysis of three studies (355 patients) comparing NVR and AVR demonstrated no significant differences in pre- and postoperative VHI-10 change (mean difference=-0.87; 95% CI, -2.51 to 0.77; P = 0.27).

CONCLUSION

Systematic review findings indicate postoperative VR may not lead to improved voice outcomes, and a meta-analysis demonstrated no difference in VHI-10 outcomes between AVR and NVR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2

Clinical Voice Outcomes for Two Voice Rest Protocols after Phonomicrosurgery

OBJECTIVES

Voice rest is commonly recommended for patients with benign vocal fold lesions (BVFLs) after phonomicrosurgery. The study compares the clinical voice outcomes of two protocols, 7-day complete voice rest (CVR) and 3-day CVR followed by 4-day relative voice rest (CVR + RVR), for patients with BVFLs after phonomicrosurgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, randomized controlled trial.

METHOD

Patients with BVFLs undergoing phonomicrosurgery were recruited prospectively and randomly assigned to either protocol. Outcomes were assessed on objective measures of acoustics (fundamental frequency, frequency range, mean intensity, cepstral peak analysis) and aerodynamics (vital capacity, airflow rate, subglottal pressure, phonation threshold pressure), as well as subjective measures, both provider-reported through the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V), and patient-reported through the Voice Handicap Index (VHI). Clinical measures were collected at three-time points: preoperatively, 1-week postoperatively (on voice rest), and 1-month postoperatively. In addition, adherence was estimated using a vocal dosimeter.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were recruited and randomized to 7-day CVR (n = 13) and CVR + RVR regimen (n = 12). Statistically significant changes were found within both groups for subglottal pressure (p = 0.03) and VHI score (p < 0.001) comparing pre-operative baseline to 1-month postoperative follow-up. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups. Regardless of group assignment, a significant decrease in overall severity ratings for the CAPE-V was found by comparing the preoperative scores to postoperative scores at 1-week (p < 0.001) and 1-month (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Both groups improved their overall voice quality comparably 1 month after undergoing phonomicrosurgery as measured by objective and subjective parameters.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

2. Laryngoscope, 134:2812-2818, 2024.

The Efficacy of Different Voice Treatments for Vocal Fold Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Vocal fold polyps (VFP) are a common cause of voice disorders and laryngeal discomfort. They are usually treated by behavioral voice therapy (VT) or phonosurgery, or a combination (CT) of both. However, the superiority of either of these treatments has not been clearly established.

METHODS

Three databases were searched from inception to October 2022 and a manual search was performed. All clinical trials of VFP treatment were included that reported at least auditory-perceptual judgment, aerodynamics, acoustics, and the patient-perceived handicap.

RESULTS

We identified 31 eligible studies (VT: n = 47-194; phonosurgery: n = 404-1039; CT: n = 237-350). All treatment approaches were highly effective, with large effect sizes (d > 0.8) and significant improvements in almost all voice parameters (p-values < 0.05). Phonosurgery reduced roughness and NHR, and the emotional and functional subscales of the VHI-30 were the most compared to behavioral voice therapy and combined treatment (p-values < 0.001). Combined treatment improved hoarseness, jitter, shimmer, MPT, and the physical subscale of the VHI-30 more than phonosurgery and behavioral voice therapy (p-values < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

All three treatment approaches were effective in eliminating vocal fold polyps or their negative sequelae, with phonosurgery and combined treatment providing the greatest improvement. These results may inform future treatment decisions for patients with vocal fold polyps.

Pre- and Postoperative Voice Therapy for Benign Vocal Fold Lesions: An International Electronic Delphi Consensus Study

INTRODUCTION

Voice therapy management of benign vocal fold lesions (BVFLs) is variable and there are currently no clinical guidelines. Poor descriptions of voice therapy interventions lead to unwarranted variation in treatment. Triangulation of the current evidence identifies a number of potential best practice elements, but also a number of outstanding questions to be explored. The aim of this study was to refine and gain global consensus on "best practice" for a pre- and postoperative voice therapy intervention for adults with BVFLs.

METHODS

An international sample of expert voice therapists (n = 42) were recruited to take part in this three-round electronic modified Delphi study. Participants were presented with statements concerning a pre- and postoperative voice therapy intervention. Statements were developed from previous research and based on the TIDieR checklist (eg, why, when, what, how?) Participants rated the extent to which they agreed or disagreed with a statement and gave comments to support their response. Consensus was defined as >75% of participants agreeing or strongly agreeing with a given statement. If consensus was not reached, participant comments were used to generate new statements and were rated in the next round. Stability of consensus between rounds was assessed.

RESULTS

The 42 international experts achieved consensus on 33 statements relating to components of a best practice pre- and postoperative voice therapy intervention for patients with BVFLs. Consensus on statements ranged from 81% to 100%. These statements were explicitly mapped to the TIDieR checklist to ensure that all aspects of the intervention were considered and the questions of "why, what, how, when and individual tailoring" were addressed.

CONCLUSIONS

This study has significantly enhanced our understanding of what should be in a best practice pre- and postoperative voice therapy intervention. It is important to now test these findings for acceptability and feasibility, prior to considering effectiveness research.