1
|
Lelic D, Nielsen LLA, Pedersen AK, Neher T. Focusing on Positive Listening Experiences Improves Speech Intelligibility in Experienced Hearing Aid Users. Trends Hear 2024; 28:23312165241246616. [PMID: 38656770 PMCID: PMC11044800 DOI: 10.1177/23312165241246616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2023] [Revised: 03/08/2024] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Negativity bias is a cognitive bias that results in negative events being perceptually more salient than positive ones. For hearing care, this means that hearing aid benefits can potentially be overshadowed by adverse experiences. Research has shown that sustaining focus on positive experiences has the potential to mitigate negativity bias. The purpose of the current study was to investigate whether a positive focus (PF) intervention can improve speech-in-noise abilities for experienced hearing aid users. Thirty participants were randomly allocated to a control or PF group (N = 2 × 15). Prior to hearing aid fitting, all participants filled out the short form of the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing scale (SSQ12) based on their own hearing aids. At the first visit, they were fitted with study hearing aids, and speech-in-noise testing was performed. Both groups then wore the study hearing aids for two weeks and sent daily text messages reporting hours of hearing aid use to an experimenter. In addition, the PF group was instructed to focus on positive listening experiences and to also report them in the daily text messages. After the 2-week trial, all participants filled out the SSQ12 questionnaire based on the study hearing aids and completed the speech-in-noise testing again. Speech-in-noise performance and SSQ12 Qualities score were improved for the PF group but not for the control group. This finding indicates that the PF intervention can improve subjective and objective hearing aid benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Tobias Neher
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Research Unit for ORL – Head & Neck Surgery and Audiology, Odense University Hospital & University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wu YH, Stangl E, Dunn C, Oleson J. Entropy as a Measure of Auditory Environment Diversity: An Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) Approach. Ear Hear 2023; 44:917-923. [PMID: 36763564 PMCID: PMC10271950 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000001334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine the validity and usefulness of entropy computed using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) data as a measure of auditory environment diversity. DESIGN We conducted two secondary analyses on existing EMA datasets. The first determined the construct validity of auditory environment entropy by examining the effect of COVID-19 on entropy. To demonstrate entropy's usefulness, the second examined if entropy could predict the benefit of hearing aid (HA) noise reduction features. RESULTS Consistent with the known effect of COVID-19 on social lifestyle, COVID-19 significantly reduced auditory environment diversity, supporting entropy's construct validity. HA users with higher entropy reported poorer outcomes and perceived more benefit from HA features, supporting the feasibility of using entropy to predict communication performance and feature benefit. CONCLUSIONS Entropy derived from EMA data is a valid and useful auditory environment diversity measure. This measure could allow researchers to better understand the communication needs of people with hearing loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Hsiang Wu
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Elizabeth Stangl
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Camille Dunn
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Jacob Oleson
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Houmøller SS, Wolff A, Tsai LT, Narayanan SK, Hougaard DD, Gaihede ML, Neher T, Godballe C, Schmidt JH. Impact of hearing aid technology level at first-fit on self-reported outcomes in patients with presbycusis: a randomized controlled trial. FRONTIERS IN AGING 2023; 4:1158272. [PMID: 37342862 PMCID: PMC10277865 DOI: 10.3389/fragi.2023.1158272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023]
Abstract
To provide clinical guidance in hearing aid prescription for older adults with presbycusis, we investigated differences in self-reported hearing abilities and hearing aid effectiveness for premium or basic hearing aid users. Secondly, as an explorative analysis, we investigated if differences in gain prescription verified with real-ear measurements explain differences in self-reported outcomes. The study was designed as a randomized controlled trial in which the patients were blinded towards the purpose of the study. In total, 190 first-time hearing aid users (>60 years of age) with symmetric bilateral presbycusis were fitted with either a premium or basic hearing aid. The randomization was stratified on age, sex, and word recognition score. Two outcome questionnaires were distributed: the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA) and the short form of the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ-12). In addition, insertion gains were calculated from real-ear measurements at first-fit for all fitted hearing aids. Premium hearing aid users reported 0.7 (95%CI: 0.2; 1.1) scale points higher total SSQ-12 score per item and 0.8 (95%CI: 0.2; 1.4) scale points higher speech score per item, as well as 0.6 (95%CI: 0.2; 1.1) scale points higher qualities score compared to basic-feature hearing aid users. No significant differences in reported hearing aid effectiveness were found using the IOI-HA. Differences in the prescribed gain at 1 and 2 kHz were observed between premium and basic hearing aids within each company. Premium-feature devices yielded slightly better self-reported hearing abilities than basic-feature devices, but a statistically significant difference was only found in three out of seven outcome variables, and the effect was small. The generalizability of the study is limited to community-dwelling older adults with presbycusis. Thus, further research is needed for understanding the potential effects of hearing aid technology for other populations. Hearing care providers should continue to insist on research to support the choice of more costly premium technologies when prescribing hearing aids for older adults with presbycusis. Clinical Trial Registration: https://register.clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT04539847.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabina Storbjerg Houmøller
- Research Unit for ORL—Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- OPEN, Odense Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Anne Wolff
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Li-Tang Tsai
- Research Unit for ORL—Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | | | - Dan Dupont Hougaard
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Michael Lyhne Gaihede
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Tobias Neher
- Research Unit for ORL—Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Christian Godballe
- Research Unit for ORL—Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- OPEN, Odense Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Jesper Hvass Schmidt
- Research Unit for ORL—Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- OPEN, Odense Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jorgensen LE, Barrett RE. Relating Factors and Trends in Hearing Device Adoption Rates to Opportunities for Hearing Health Care Providers. Semin Hear 2022; 43:289-300. [PMCID: PMC9715305 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1758374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
As with many professions, audiology is continuing to evolve. More specifically in terms of hearing device technology, we see evolution in remote accessibility to providers, public knowledge of devices, and services provided by hearing care professionals. Each of these topics plays a role in an individual's decision to pursue any sort of hearing care services. Given the variety of new devices soon coming to the market (over-the-counter devices), it is important for the audiologist to understand patient motivators and how they have a great impact on both the practice of audiology as well as the patient's overall satisfaction. The goal of this article is to investigate the MarkeTrak 2022 data to determine the trends in adoption and use of hearing aids as well as examine predictive factors that can be used to better understand hearing aid adoption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsey E. Jorgensen
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, South Dakota,Address for correspondence Lindsey Jorgensen, Au.D., Ph.D. Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Dakota414 E. Clark St., Vermillion, SD 57069
| | - Rachel E. Barrett
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, South Dakota
| |
Collapse
|