Randomized comparison of differing periods of twice-a-day triple therapy for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori

Primer for Development of Guidelines for Helicobacter pylori Therapy Using Antimicrobial Stewardship

We provide a primer to assist in the difficult transition of Helicobacter pylori therapy guidelines to those that adhere to the principles of antimicrobial stewardship. This transition will entail abandonment of many of the principles that heretofore formed the basis of treatment guidelines and recommendations. The goals of antimicrobial stewardship include optimization of the use of antibiotics while reducing antimicrobial resistance. The critical outcome measure is absolute cure rate which largely restricts comparative trials to those which reliably produce high cure rates (eg, ∼95%). Therapies that fail to achieve at least a 90% cure rate should be abandoned as unacceptable. Because only optimized therapies should be prescribed, guidance on the principles and practices of optimization will we required. Therapies that contain antibiotics which do not contribute to outcome should be eliminated. Surveillance, one of the fundamental elements of antimicrobial stewardship, must be done to provide ongoing assurance that the recommended therapies remain effective. It is yet not widely recognized when utilizing otherwise highly successful therapies, the routine test of cure data is an indirect, surrogate method for susceptibility testing. To systematically guide therapy, test of cure data should be collected, shared and integrated into local antimicrobial stewardship programs to provide guidance regarding best practices to both prescribers and public health individuals. Treatment recommendations should be compatible with those of the American Society of Infectious Disease white paper on the conduct of superiority and organism-specific clinical trials of antibacterial agents for the treatment of infections caused by drug-resistant bacterial pathogens which include criteria for ethical active-controlled superiority studies of antibacterial agents.

Antibiotic Resistance of Helicobacter pylori Among Male United States Veterans

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The most recent information published on resistance of Helicobacter pylori to antibiotics in a large population in the United States is more than 10 years old. We assessed the susceptibility of H pylori to antibiotics among patients in a large metropolitan hospital, as well as demographic, clinical, and lifestyle factors associated with antimicrobial resistance.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional study of a random sample of 656 patients (90.2% men) from a cohort of 1559 undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy with collection of gastric biopsies from 2009 through 2013 at the Houston Veterans Affairs Medical Center. We performed culture analyses of gastric tissues to detect H pylori. The minimum inhibitory concentrations of amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole, levofloxacin, and tetracycline were determined by the Epsilometer test. Logistic regression analysis was performed to estimate the association between risk factors and antimicrobial resistance.

RESULTS

Biopsies from 135 subjects (20.6%) tested positive for H pylori; 128 of these were from men (94.8%). Only 65 strains were susceptible to all 5 antibiotics. The prevalence of resistance to levofloxacin was 31.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 23.1%-39.4%), to metronidazole it was 20.3% (95% CI, 13.2%-27.4%), to clarithromycin it was 16.4% (95% CI, 9.9%-22.9%), and to tetracycline it was 0.8% (95% CI, 0.0%-2.3%). No isolate was resistant to amoxicillin. Clarithromycin resistance increased from 9.1% in 2009-2010 to 24.2% in 2011-2013. In multivariate analysis, prior treatment of H pylori infection and use of fluoroquinolones were significantly associated with clarithromycin and levofloxacin resistance, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

H pylori resistance to clarithromycin increased between 2009 and 2013; resistance to metronidazole remains high in infected men in the United States. The high frequency of resistance to levofloxacin is a new and concerning finding.

Systematic review and meta-analysis: full- vs. half-dose anti-microbials in clarithromycin-based regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication

BACKGROUND

Half-dose regimens may be equally effective but associated with diminished adverse events (AE) than standard-dose regimens.

AIM

To assess efficacy and safety of full- vs. half-dose clarithromycin in the treatment of H. pylori.

METHODS

Medline, EMBASE and PubMed databases were searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that meet eligibility criteria. Only parallel group RCTs with ≥ 2 arms were eligible. Studies comparing triple, quadruple or sequential therapy for 7-14 days were selected. Regimens had to contain the same drug combination, differing only in dosage; the comparison of full- vs. half-dose clarithromycin was required, regardless if other drugs were dose-reduced or not. Data extraction was performed for primary outcome [eradication by intent-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses] and secondary outcome (AE).

RESULTS

A total of 1622 articles were identified, of which 19 studies were eligible. Overall, eradication was achieved in 82.5% of half-dose (n = 2115) vs. 83.4% of full-dose recipients (n = 2109) on ITT (87.1% vs. 88.4% on PP respectively). Pooled relative risk in the half- vs. full-dose regimen was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.95-1.02) on ITT and 0.99 (95% CI: 0.97-1.01) on PP by the random effects model. Heterogeneity was significant (chi-squared statistic P = 0.05, I(2) = 37%). AE were reported in 29.3% of half- vs. 44.0% of full-dose recipients [pooled RR 0.67 (95% CI: 0.60-0.75)]. Pre-planned subgroup analyses of dose modification, sample size, study origin and treatment duration, as well as sensitivity analysis showed no significant differences between arms.

CONCLUSION

A half-dose clarithromycin-based regimen is equally effective yet better tolerated than its full-dose counterpart in the treatment of H. pylori.

Cultural relevance in medication adherence interventions with underrepresented adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis systematically compiles intervention research designed to increase medication adherence among underrepresented adults.

METHOD

Comprehensive searching located published and unpublished studies with medication adherence behavior outcomes. Studies were included if samples were adults living in North America who had any of the following backgrounds or identities: African American, Native American, Latino, Latino American, Asian, Asian American, Pacific Islander, Native Alaskan, or Native Hawaiian. Random-effect analyses synthesized data to calculate effect sizes as a standardized mean difference and variability measures. Exploratory moderator analyses examined the association between specific efforts to increase the cultural relevance of medication adherence studies and behavior outcomes.

RESULTS

Data were synthesized across 5559 subjects in 55 eligible samples. Interventions significantly improved medication adherence behavior of treatment subjects compared to control subjects (standardized mean difference=0.211). Primary studies infrequently reported strategies to enhance cultural relevance. Exploratory moderator analyses found no evidence that associated cultural relevance strategies with better medication adherence outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The modest magnitude of improvements in medication adherence behavior documents the need for further research with clear testing of cultural relevance features.

Challenging the dogma: a randomized trial of standard vs. half-dose concomitant nonbismuth quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND

Current treatment of Helicobacter pylori consists of three or four drugs for 7-14 days with important associated cost and adverse events.

AIMS

This study compared efficacy and safety of standard dose vs. half-dose concomitant nonbismuth quadruple therapy (NBQT) for 7 days. The standard dose consisted of twice daily rabeprazole 20 mg, amoxicillin 1 g, metronidazole 500 mg, and clarithromycin 500 mg.

METHODS

This was a prospective randomized trial. (14)C-urea breath test was performed ≥4 weeks after treatment and ≥2 weeks off acid suppressive therapy. Compliance and adverse events were monitored during treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 200 consecutive treatment-naïve patients were enrolled. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, with 15.5% of subjects reporting prior macrolide use. Eradication occurred in 78% (95% CI 68.6-85.7%) in both groups on intention-to-treat analysis. Per-protocol rates were 82.1 vs. 83.9% for standard-dose patients vs. half-dose patients, respectively (p = NS). Adverse events (only mild) were reported in 57 vs. 41% of standard-dose patients vs. half-dose patients (p = 0.024), with metallic taste and nausea notably less frequent in the latter (36 vs. 12% and 18 vs. 7%, respectively; p < 0.05 for both). Overall, eradication failed in 38.7% of prior macrolide users vs. 18.9% without such exposure (p = 0.019). On multivariate logistic regression, prior macrolide exposure was the only factor associated with failed eradication (OR 2.60, 95% CI 1.06-6.39; p = 0.038). Treatment was cheaper with the half-dose regimen.

INTERPRETATION

A 50% reduction in antibiotic dosage does not diminish efficacy of concomitant nonbismuth quadruple therapy but leads to significant reduction in cost and adverse events. Seven-day concomitant NBQT is suboptimal for H. pylori independent of prior macrolide exposure.

N-acetyl cysteine as an adjunct to standard anti-Helicobacter pylori eradication regimen in patients with dyspepsia: A prospective randomized, open-label trial

Background:

Increasing antibiotic resistance of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) which is associated with diseases of the upper gastrointestinal tract, has made alternative treatments necessary. This study compares the efficacy of adding N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) to standard regimen for H. pylori eradication.

Materials and Methods:

We conducted a randomized, open-label trial, comparing the efficacy of 14 days of quadruple therapy with Amoxicillin, Bismuth citrate, Omeprazole, Clarithromycin (group A) versus 14 days of above regimen plus NAC (group B) in adult patients with dyspepsia. Primary objective was H. pylori eradication. Compliance and side effects were determined by questionnaires. Our analysis was by intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol. This study is registered with www.IRCT.ir, number: IRCT201201078634N1.

Result:

A total of 121 participants aged 21-76 years with a mean age of 44.5 ± 14.1, and 52.9% female, were randomly allocated a treatment: 60 with 14-day standard therapy and 61 with 14-day standard therapy with NAC. The eradication rate in groups A and B with ITT analyses was 49/60 (81.7%; 95% [confidence intervals] CI = 71.6-91.8%) and 50/61 (82%; 95% CI = 72-91.9%), respectively (P = 0.96). In per-protocol analysis, the rate of H. pylori eradication in groups A and B was 45/54 (83.3%; 95% CI = 73.1-93.6%) and 45/53 (84.9%; 95% CI = 74.9-94.9%), respectively (P = 0.82). Minor well tolerated side effects were reported in 15 (34.9%) and 21 (35.6%) patients of groups A and B, respectively, and only one therapy cessation in group A was created.

Conclusion:

Standard 14-day triple-drug therapy with NAC is not preferable to standard drug regimens for H. pylori infection.

Optimum duration of regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication

BACKGROUND

The optimal duration for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication therapy is controversial, with recommendations ranging from 7 to 14 days. Several systematic reviews have attempted to address this issue but have given conflicting results and limited their analysis to proton pump inhibitor (PPI), two antibiotics (PPI triple) therapy. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the optimal duration of multiple H. pylori eradication regimens.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to assess the relative effectiveness of different durations (7, 10 or 14 days) of a variety of regimens for eradicating H. pylori. The primary outcome was H. pylori persistence. The secondary outcome was adverse events.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL were searched up to December 2011 to identify eligible randomised controlled trials (RCTs). We also searched the proceedings of six conferences from 1995 to 2011, dissertations and theses, and grey literature. There were no language restrictions applied to any search.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Only parallel group RCTs assessing the efficacy of one to two weeks duration of first line H. pylori eradication regimens in adults were eligible. Within each regimen, the same combinations of drugs at the same dose were compared over different durations. Studies with at least two arms comparing 7, 10, or 14 days were eligible. Enrolled participants needed to be diagnosed with at least one positive test for H. pylori on the basis of a rapid urease test (RUT), histology, culture, urea breath test (UBT), or a stool antigen test (HpSA) before treatment. Eligible trials needed to confirm eradication of H. pylori as their primary outcome at least 28 days after completion of eradication treatment. Trials using only serology or a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to determine H. pylori infection or eradication were excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Study eligibility and data extraction were performed by two independent review authors. Data analyses were performed within each type of intervention, for both primary and secondary outcomes. The relative risk (RR) and number needed to treat (NNT)/number needed to harm (NNTH) according to duration of therapy were calculated using the outcomes of H. pylori persistence and adverse events. A random-effects model was used. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were planned a priori.

MAIN RESULTS

In total, 75 studies met the inclusion criteria. Eight types of regimens were reported with at least two comparative eligible durations. They included: PPI + two antibiotics triple therapy (n = 59), PPI bismuth-based quadruple therapy (n = 6), PPI + three antibiotics quadruple therapy (n = 1), PPI dual therapy (n = 2), histamine H2-receptor antagonist (H₂RA) bismuth quadruple therapy (n = 3), H₂RA bismuth-based triple therapy (n = 2), H₂RA + two antibiotics triple therapy (n = 3), and bismuth + two antibiotics triple therapy (n = 2). Some studies provided data for more than one regimen or more than two durations.For the PPI triple therapy, 59 studies with five regimens were reported: PPI + clarithromycin + amoxicillin (PCA); PPI + clarithromycin + a nitroimidazole (PCN); PPI + amoxicillin + nitroimidazole (PAN); PPI + amoxicillin + a quinolone (PAQ); and PPI + amoxicillin + a nitrofuran (PANi). Regardless of type and dose of antibiotics, increased duration of PPI triple therapy from 7 to 14 days significantly increased the H. pylori eradication rate (45 studies, 72.9% versus 81.9%), the RR for H. pylori persistence was 0.66 (95% CI 0.60 to 0.74), NNT was 11 (95% CI 9 to 14). Significant effects were seen in the subgroup of PCA (34 studies, RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.75; NNT 12, 95% CI 9 to 16); PAN (10 studies, RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.86; NNT = 11, 95% CI 8 to 25); and in PAQ (2 studies, RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.83; NNT 3, 95% CI 2 to 10); but not in PCN triple therapy (4 studies, RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.07). Significantly increased eradication rates were also seen for PPI triple therapy with 10 versus 7 days (24 studies, 79.9% versus 75.7%; RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.89; NNT 21, 95% CI 15 to 38) and 14 versus 10 days (12 studies, 84.4% versus 78.5%; RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.90; NNT 17, 95% CI 11 to 46); especially in the subgroup of PAC for 10 versus 7 days (17 studies, RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.91) and for 14 versus 10 days (10 studies, RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.91). A trend towards increased H. pylori eradication rates was seen with increased duration of PCN for 10 versus 7 days, and of PAN for 10 versus 7 days and 14 versus 10 days, though this was not statistical significant. The proportion of patients with adverse events, defined by authors, was marginally significantly increased only between 7 days and 14 days (15.5% versus 19.4%; RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.37; NNTH 31, 95% CI 18 to 104) but not for other duration comparisons. The proportion of patients discontinuing treatment due to adverse events was not significantly different between treatment durations.Only limited data were reported for different durations of regimens other than PPI triple therapy. No significant difference of the eradication rate was seen for all regimens according to different durations except for H₂RA bismuth quadruple therapy, where a significantly higher eradication rate was seen for 14 days versus 7 days, however only one study reported outcome data.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Increasing the duration of PPI-based triple therapy increases H. pylori eradication rates. For PCA, prolonging treatment duration from 7 to 10 or from 10 to 14 days is associated with a significantly higher eradication rate. The optimal duration of therapy for PCA and PAN is at least 14 days. More data are needed to confirm if there is any benefit of increasing the duration of therapy for PCN therapy. Information is limited for regimens other than PPI triple therapy; more studies are needed to draw meaningful conclusions for optimal duration of other H. pylori eradication regimens.

Empiric quadruple vs. triple therapy for primary treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection: Systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and tolerability

OBJECTIVES

Recent treatment guidelines recommend two first-line therapies for Helicobacter pylori infection: proton pump inhibitor (PPI), bismuth, tetracycline, and metronidazole (quadruple therapy) or PPI, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin (triple therapy). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and tolerability of these regimens as first-line treatment of H. pylori.

METHODS

A search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Google Scholar, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ACP Journal Club, the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness, Cochrane Methodology Register, Health Technology Assessment Database, and abstracts from prominent gastrointestinal scientific meetings was carried out. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing bismuth quadruple therapy to clarithromycin triple therapy were selected for meta-analysis. Two independent reviewers extracted data, using standardized data forms. Meta-analysis was carried out with the metan command in Stata 10.1. Funnel plots and subgroup analyses were carried out.

RESULTS

Nine RCTs (N=1,679) were included. Although dosing regimens of clarithromycin triple therapy were quite consistent between trials, dosing regimens varied considerably for bismuth quadruple therapy. Bismuth quadruple therapy achieved eradication in 78.3% of patients, whereas clarithromycin triple therapy achieved an eradication rate of 77.0% (risk ratio (RR)=1.002, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.936-1.073). There was moderate heterogeneity and no evidence for significant publication bias. Subgroup analyses by study location, treatment duration, and study population did not account for the heterogeneity. There were no statistically significant differences in side effects yielded by quadruple vs. clarithromycin triple therapy (RR=1.04, 95% CI: 1.04-1.14).

CONCLUSIONS

Quadruple and triple therapies yielded similar eradication rates as primary therapy for H. pylori infection. Both therapies yielded suboptimal eradication rates. Patient compliance and side effects are similar for quadruple and triple therapies.

Is a 7-day Helicobater pylori treatment enough for eradication and inactivation of gastric inflammatory activity?

AIM: To compare the efficacy of a 7-d vs 10-d triple therapy regarding H pylori eradication, endoscopic findings and histological gastric inflammatory inactivation in the Ecuadorian population.

METHODS: 136 patients with dyspepsia and H pylori infection were randomized in 2 groups (68 per group): group 1, 7-d therapy; group 2, 10-d therapy. Both groups received the same medication and daily dosage: omeprazole 20 mg bid, clarithromycin 500 mg bid and amoxicillin 1 g bid. Endoscopy was performed for histological assessment and H pylori infection status before and 8 wk after treatment.

RESULTS: H pylori was eradicated in 68% of group 1 vs 83.8% of group 2 for the intention-to-treat analysis (ITT) (P = 0.03; OR = 2.48; 95% CI, 1.1-5.8), and 68% in group 1 vs 88% in group 2 for the per-protocol analysis (PP) (P = 0.008; OR = 3.66; 95% CI, 1.4-10). Endoscopic gastric mucosa normalization was observed in 56.9% in group 1 vs 61.2% in group 2 for ITT, with similar results for the PP, the difference being statistically not significant. The rate of inflammatory inactivation was 69% in group 1 vs 88.7% in group 2 for ITT (P = 0.007; OR = 3.00; 95% CI, 1.2-7.5), and 69% in group 1 vs 96% in group 2 for PP (P = 0.0002; OR = 7.25; 95% CI, 2-26).

CONCLUSION: In this Ecuadorian population, the 10-d therapy was more effective than the 7-d therapy for H pylori eradication as well as for gastric mucosa inflammatory inactivation.

Eradication therapy for Helicobacter pylori

Eradication therapy for Helicobacter pylori is recommended in a number of clinical conditions. In this article, we discuss the epidemiology and cellular mechanisms that result in antimicrobial resistance, the results of current eradication therapies, and new approaches to the management of Helicobacter pylori infection.

Optimal length of triple therapy for H pylori eradication in a population with high prevalence of infection in Chile

AIM: To compare the efficacy of 7-d versus 14-d triple therapy for the treatment of H pylori infection in Chile, with a prevalence of 73% in general population.

METHODS: H pylori-infected patients diagnosed by rapid urease test, with non-ulcer dyspepsia or peptic ulcer disease were randomized to receive omeprazole 20 mg bid, amoxicillin 1 g bid, and clarithromycin 500 mg bid for 7 (OAC7) or 14 (OAC14) d. Primary outcome was eradication rate 6 wk after the treatment. Subgroup analysis was carried out considering the eradication rate among patients with or without peptic ulcer disease and eradication rate among smokers or non-smokers.

RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-one patients were randomized to OAC7 (n = 69) or OAC14 (n = 62). The overall eradication rate (intention-to-treat) was 78.3% in OAC7 and 85.5% in OAC14 groups, without a significant difference (P =0.37). No significant difference in the eradication rate was found among the patients with peptic ulcer disease (n = 31) between the OAC7 group (85.7%) and OAC14 group (87.5%). However, smokers had an obviously lower eradication rate compared to non-smokers, particularly in the OAC7 group (57.1% in smokers vs 83.6% in non-smokers; P = 0.06). Adverse effects rate were similar between both groups.

CONCLUSION: Short-term efficacy of triple therapy with OAC for 7 d is comparable to 14 d in this high-prevalence population. Longer follow-up, and studies focused to some subgroups of patients (smokers and non-ulcer patients) are necessary to support widespread use of 7-d instead of 10-14-d triple therapy in a developing country like Chile.

Helicobacter pylori eradication: equivalence trials and the optimal duration of therapy

Equivalence trials are gaining popularity and seek to compare the efficacy of two different types of treatment. The design of these trials requires careful consideration of clinical, statistical, and regulatory concerns. We discuss the importance and key factors relevant to equivalence trials.

Medication adherence and persistence: a comprehensive review

Estimates of adherence to long-term medication regimens range from 17% to 80%, and nonadherence (or nonpersistence) can lead to increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Multifaceted interventions that target specific barriers to adherence are most effective, because they address the problems and reinforce positive behaviors. Providers must assess their patients' understanding of the illness and its treatment, communicate the benefits of the treatment, assess their patients' readiness to carry out the treatment plan, and discuss any barriers or obstacles to adherence that patients may have. A positive, supporting, and trusting relationship between patient and provider improves adherence. Individual patient factors also affect adherence. For example, conditions that impair cognition have a negative impact on adherence. Other factors--such as the lack of a support network, limited English proficiency, inability to obtain and pay for medications, or severe adverse effects or the fear of such effects--are all barriers to adherence. There are multiple reasons for nonadherence or nonpersistence; the solution needs to be tailored to the individual patient's needs. To have an impact on adherence, healthcare providers must understand the barriers to adherence and the methods or tools needed to overcome them. This report describes the barriers to medication adherence and persistence and interventions that have been used to address them; it also identifies interventions and compliance aids that practitioners and organizations can implement.

Seven-day therapy for Helicobacter pylori in the United States

BACKGROUND

The ideal duration of Helicobacter pylori treatment in the United States and whether eradication therapy is as successful in nonulcer dyspepsia as in peptic ulcer disease are controversial topics.

AIM

This study compared the efficacy of 3-, 7- and 10-day triple therapies with rabeprazole to a 10-day omeprazole control triple therapy for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori in patients with and without peptic ulcer disease in the United States.

METHODS

This was a multicentre, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group trial. A total of 803 patients with H. pylori infection (determined by [13C]urea breath test and rapid urease test or culture) received either rabeprazole 20 mg b.d., amoxicillin 1000 mg b.d., and clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. for 3, 7, or 10 days, or 10 days of omeprazole 20 mg b.d. with the same antibiotic regimen (control). H. pylori status was assessed by [13C]urea breath test > or =6 weeks after completing treatment.

RESULTS

In intent-to-treat patients, the eradication percentages achieved for the rabeprazole-based treatments were: 3-day, 27% (95% confidence interval: 21%-34%); 7-day, 77% (95% confidence interval: 71%-83%); and 10-day, 78% (95% confidence interval: 72%-84%). The eradication percentage with the 10-day omeprazole-based treatment was 73% (95% confidence interval: 67%-79%). There was no statistically significant difference between the 7-day rabeprazole-based regimen and the 10-day rabeprazole- and omeprazole-based regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Seven-day therapy with rabeprazole, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin is similar in efficacy to 10-day therapies and had similar efficacy in patients with and without ulcer disease.

Rank order of success favors longer duration of imidazole-based therapy for Helicobacter pylori in duodenal ulcer disease: a randomized pilot study

BACKGROUND

Studies on eradication therapy in developing countries have shown a success rate of 70-85%, which is suboptimal. Duration of therapy may be an important factor dictating eradication success in such regions.

AIMS

The study was undertaken to evaluate the effect of increasing the treatment period on eradication of Helicobacter pylori in duodenal ulcer disease.

METHODS

A randomized trial was carried out in which 64 consecutive H. pylori-infected patients with duodenal ulcer disease were enrolled. The patients were randomized to one of the three trial arms. Therapy consisted of lansoprazole 30 mg twice a day (b.i.d.), amoxycillin 1 g b.i.d. and tinidazole 500 mg b.i.d. The treatment period was 1 week in group I, 2 weeks in group II and 3 weeks in group III. At inclusion, patients underwent endoscopy and the presence of H. pylori was documented by a positive urease test and C14 urea breath test. Four weeks after completion of eradication therapy, the patients were subjected to repeat endoscopy to assess ulcer healing and tests for H. pylori infection.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients (55 male and nine female; mean age 35.5 years) were enrolled in each group. The H. pylori eradication rate for group I (1 week of therapy) was 47.6%, that for group II (2 weeks of therapy) was 80%, and that for group III (3 weeks of therapy) was 91.3% (p =.003). The ulcer healing rates were 71.4, 80 and 95.6% in groups I, II and III, respectively (p =.09).

CONCLUSIONS

The 3-week regimen significantly improved the eradication rate as compared with the 1-week regime. Increasing the duration of therapy significantly improved the chances of eradication of H. pylori in duodenal ulcer disease.

Eficácia do regime terapêutico empregando a associação de pantoprazol, claritromicina e amoxicilina, durante uma semana, na erradicação do Helicobacter pylori em pacientes com úlcera péptica

OBJETIVO: Estudo multicêntrico, aberto, delineado para determinar a eficácia da associação de pantoprazol, claritromicina e amoxicilina, na erradicação do Helicobacter pylori em pacientes portadores de úlcera péptica. MATERIAL E MÉTODOS: Setenta e um pacientes (36 mulheres, 35 homens, idade média 41,9 anos) provenientes de três centros universitários brasileiros (Belo Horizonte e Porto Alegre) com úlcera péptica confirmada à endoscopia e infecção por H. pylori comprovada por, no mínimo, dois testes diagnósticos. Os pacientes foram tratados com a associação de pantoprazol 40 mg, claritromicina 500 mg e amoxicilina 1,0 g, administrada duas vezes ao dia, durante 7 dias. RESULTADOS: Ao final do tratamento, os pacientes foram reexaminados para avaliação dos sintomas gastrointestinais, presença de eventos adversos e aderência ao tratamento. Nova endoscopia com biopsias e teste respiratório com 13C-uréia foram repetidos 60 dias após o término do tratamento para determinação das taxas de erradicação do microrganismo. Foram considerados H. pylori negativos os pacientes com, pelo menos, o teste respiratório com 13C-uréia e mais um teste (teste da urease ou histologia) negativos. Ao final do estudo 60/69 (87%, 95% = 78,9-94,8) pacientes erradicaram o H. pylori na análise por protocolo e 60/71 (84,5%, 95% = 76-92,9) na análise por intenção de tratamento. Um paciente interrompeu o tratamento devido à diarréia. Doze pacientes (16,9%) apresentaram sintomas adversos e considerados de leve intensidade. CONCLUSÃO: A associação de pantoprazol, amoxicilina e claritromicina por 7 dias constitui alternativa eficaz e bem tolerada para a erradicação do H. pylori em portadores de úlcera péptica no Brasil.

Recent use of proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapies for the eradication of H pylori: a broad data review

INTRODUCTION

For the eradication of Helicobacter pylori a 1-week triple therapy combining proton pump inhibitors with two antibiotics has been recommended as a gold standard therapy. However, a recent broad data review on the efficacy of the different regimens is missing. Therefore, the aim of this study was to systematically review the recent literature.

METHODS

We undertook a broad data review of the efficacy of nine different 7-day triple therapies consisting of a proton pump inhibitor (lansoprazole, pantoprazole, omeprazole) in its standard dosage and two antibiotics. Relevant original papers on H. pylori eradication in adults, published in English or German between 1995 and 2000, were identified from MEDLINE searches. Studies were reviewed and selected according to predefined criteria.

RESULTS

Our predefined criteria were fulfilled by 79 full paper articles including 112 study arms with 8383 patients on intention-to-treat, or 6787 patients on per-protocol basis, respectively. The mean eradication rates unweighted or weighted by the number of patients in the study arm vary from 71.9% to 83.8% for intention-to-treat analysis and from 78.5% to 91.2% for per-protocol analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

All nine PPI based triple therapy regimens are very effective in H. pylori eradication. The current literature review underlines that the use of either lansoprazole, omeprazole, or pantoprazole combined with two antibiotics yield similar high eradication rates.

One-week triple vs. quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection - a randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Seven-day triple therapy including omeprazole, clarithromycin and amoxicillin has become the treatment of choice for Helicobacter pylori infection. However, 7 days of classical quadruple therapy combining omeprazole, tetracycline, metronidazole and bismuth may be an alternative to triple therapy.

AIM

To compare triple vs. quadruple therapy for H.pylori eradication.

METHODS

Three hundred and thirty-nine patients with peptic ulcer and H. pylori infection were included in the study. Patients were randomized to receive omeprazole, 20 mg, amoxicillin, 1 g, and clarithromycin, 500 mg, all b.d., or omeprazole, 20 mg b.d., tetracycline chloride, 500 mg, metronidazole, 500 mg, and bismuth subcitrate, 120 mg, all t.d.s. Cure was defined as a negative urea breath test at least 2 months after treatment.

RESULTS

Per protocol and intention-to-treat cure rates were 86%[95% confidence interval (CI), 80-91%] and 77% (95% CI, 70-83%) for triple therapy, and 89% (95% CI, 82-93%) and 83% (95% CI, 76-88%) for quadruple therapy. No significant differences between the groups were found in the cure rates, compliance or side-effects.

CONCLUSION

One-week triple and quadruple therapy show similar results when used as first-line eradication treatment.

Treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection. Indications and regimens: an update

The management of Helicobacter pylori infection is still surrounded by controversy and uncertainties. Indications and correct application of current regimens for Helicobacter pylori infection are still considered a matter of debate. Regarding indications, only peptic ulcer and mucosa associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma are considered clear indications for treatment. In other conditions, such as atrophic gastritis, post gastric cancer resection, first-degree relatives of gastric cancer patients, dyspeptic patients, patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug users, the value of Helicobacter pylori eradication is still controversial. The regimens for first-line and second-line treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection have been recommended by the Maastricht 2 Consensus Report. Although all the treatments are considered to be effective, physicians still do not agree on what first-line regimen should be used. Furthermore, a consensus on the duration of the antibiotic treatment is still lacking, although Maastricht guidelines for treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection recommend a one-week therapy. Also regimens, as a third-line treatment, and methods to improve compliance and clinical outcome are still a matter of debate. All these points will be considered in the present review

Helicobacter pylori infection: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and therapy

Helicobacter pylori is one of the most commonly encountered human pathogens. It has been shown to be closely associated with peptic ulcer disease (PUD), gastric adenocarcinoma, and the gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) that may lead to gastric lymphoma. The current diagnostic methods include histology, microbiological culture, classic serology, urease activity detection, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and stool antigen detection. Its treatment modality options are multiple; however, a triple regimen consisting of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), and two antibiotics for 10 to 14 days is preferred. Drug resistance is a growing problem in this organism and new therapeutic options are currently limited.

Outcomes of Helicobacter pylori treatment in community practice and impact of therapeutic effectiveness information on physician behaviour

BACKGROUND

The effect of knowledge of Helicobacter pylori eradication rates on physician choice of treatment regimen is unknown. As practice variation results in differences in outcome, it is important to determine whether physician behaviour can be altered by such knowledge.

AIMS

(i) To determine whether dissemination of practice variation and effectiveness data regarding H. pylori changes subsequent prescribing behaviour and (ii) whether this change results in an improvement in the effectiveness of therapy.

METHODS

Community gastroenterologists in the Portland metropolitan area enrolled patients being treated for H. pylori. The regimen used, diagnostic method, indication and success in eradication was measured. Patient-centred factors were also measured, including symptoms, interest in post-treatment diagnostic testing and willingness to pay.

RESULTS

Significantly more physicians participating in both studies used proton pump inhibitor-triple therapy based regimens in this trial (46% vs. 85%, P=0.01), although the overall difference between the two trials was not significant (62% vs. 83%, P=0.11). There was no change in overall eradication rates by per protocol analysis between trials (84% vs. 85%, P=0.78), but a significant decrease in effectiveness by intention-to-treat analysis observed in this study (80% vs. 71%, P=0.03). Significantly more patients were treated for reasons other than peptic ulcer disease in this study (P=0.0003).

CONCLUSIONS

The overall effectiveness of H. pylori therapy in practice remains good. There has been a shift in the choice of treatment regimen and indication for therapy between the time periods of the two studies. Dissemination of treatment data appears to effect prescribing behaviour, but whether it has a beneficial effect on treatment outcome remains unproven.

Clarithromycin resistance of Helicobacter pylori has a major impact on the efficacy of the omeprazole-amoxicillin-clarithromycin therapy

Clarithromycin resistance of Helicobacter pylori is relatively frequent in France and is assumed to be the main cause of failure of the proton pump inhibitor-amoxicillin-clarithromycin (PPI-AC) therapy, which is the first-line regimen in our country. We determined the respective effects of clarithromycin primary and secondary resistances on efficacy of the PPI-AC regimen and examined whether failures were associated with persistence of the same strain or with emergence of a new one. Hundred and twenty three H. pylori-infected patients were treated for seven days with omeprazole 20 mg b.d., amoxicillin 1 g b.d., and clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. Eradication was assessed by breath test in 102 patients. MICs of clarithromycin were determined by E-test. Strain genotyping was performed by random amplified polymorphic DNA. The pre-treatment and post-treatment prevalences of clarithromycin resistance were 18.7% (23/123) and 69.2% (9/13), respectively. The rates of eradication were 67.6% (69/102), 78.8% (67/85), and 11.8% (2/17) for all, susceptible and resistant strains, respectively. The post-treatment isolate was available for six patients with a susceptible pre-treatment isolate and a persistent infection; resistance emerged in two patients and was associated with persistence of the pre-treatment strain in one and with selection of a new strain in the other. In conclusion, in our hospital, failures of the PPI-AC therapy are related to both clarithromycin primary and secondary resistances but emergence of secondary resistance does not explain all failures in the initial clarithromycin-susceptible group. In that group a new strain can emerge after failure.

Peptic ulcer disease

Peptic ulcer disease is a common gastrointestinal disease whose management and treatment has changed dramatically over the last 25 years. Treatment of peptic ulcer disease has evolved from dietary modifications and antacids to gastric acid suppression with H2-receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors to eradication of Helicobactor pylori infection. Treatment of patients infected with H pylori using antibiotics has changed the natural history of peptic ulcer disease. As a result of H pylori treatment and other unknown factors ulcer disease is declining and complications from ulcer disease have diminished significantly.

What is the optimal length of proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapies for H. pylori? A cost-effectiveness analysis

BACKGROUND

Triple therapy with a proton pump inhibitor, clarithromycin and amoxicillin is widely used for H. pylori infection. The appropriate length of treatment remains controversial.

AIM

To determine whether length of treatment has an impact on the cost-effectiveness of triple therapy.

METHODS

The study took the form of a cost-effectiveness analysis spanning 2 years. The perspective was societal and the setting, ambulatory care. Subjects were Helicobacter pylori-positive patients with a duodenal ulcer. The triple therapy trials spanned 7, 10 or 14 days and the main outcome measures were cost per patient and marginal cost for additional cured patient calculated for a low cost-of-care setting (Spain), for a high-cost setting (USA), and for two follow-up strategies: (i) systematic 13C-urea breath test after eradication; (ii) clinical follow-up, breath-test if symptoms recurred.

RESULTS

Base-case analysis showed that for both the 13C-UBT and the clinical follow-up branches, lowest costs were obtained with 7-day schedules both in Spain and the USA. Sensitivity analysis showed that in Spain, 10-day therapies would have to increase 7-day cure rates by 10-12% to become cost-effective. In contrast, in the USA only a 3-5% increase was needed. The corresponding figures for 14-day therapy were 25-35% and 8-11%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Seven-day therapies seem the most cost-effective strategy. However, in high-cost areas the differences were less evident.

Modified seven-day, quadruple therapy as a first line Helicobacter pylori treatment

BACKGROUND

Cure rates of 7-day triple therapy seem to be decreasing. Quadruple therapies may be an alternative, although their complex administration makes patient acceptance difficult.

OBJECTIVE

To test the usefulness of a thrice a day, quadruple therapy to cure Helicobacter pylori infection.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 122 consecutive patients with peptic ulcer and Helicobacter pylori infection were treated with omeprazole 20 mg b.d., tetracycline chlorhydrate 500 mg t.d.s., metronidazole 500 mg t.d.s., and bismuth subcitrate 120 mg t.d.s. administered with meals for 7 days. Cure was tested by either endoscopy or breath test after 2 months, and by urea breath test 6 months after therapy.

RESULTS

Seven patients were lost to follow-up. Of the remaining 115, 110 were cured at the first control, giving an intention-to-treat cure rate of 90.2% (95% CI: 83-95%) and a per protocol cure rate of 95.7% (95% CI: 90-98%). One hundred three patients returned for a 6-month breath test; all but one were cured. Side-effects were minimal or minor in 47 patients (40.8%) and moderate in four (3.4%). Compliance was good, 95% of patients taking more than 90% of the pills. Six (5%) patients stopped treatment after 1, 2, 4 (two patients) and 6 (two patients) days.

CONCLUSION

Thrice a day quadruple therapy shows excellent cure rates, far above 90%, is well-tolerated and compliance is easy. Head-to-head comparison with triple therapies as first line Helicobacter pylori treatment seems warranted.

Short-course versus conventional length antimicrobial therapy for uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections in children: a meta-analysis of 1279 patients

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to compare the efficacies of single-dose, short-course (4 days or less), and standard course (5 days or greater) antimicrobial therapy for uncomplicated childhood cystitis.

METHODS

Prospective, randomized, controlled trials comparing 4 days or less of therapy (short courses) with 5 days or more of therapy (conventional therapy) were included if all of the subjects were <18 years of age, the initial infection was documented by urine culture, at least 1 subsequent culture was obtained between 3 and 30 days of enrollment, and some attempt was made to separate upper tract from lower tract infection. Composite differences among treatment groups were compared with a fixed or random effects model, depending on the test for heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Of the 517 citations identified by literature search, 37 were selected for detailed review, and 22 were included in the final meta-analysis. The overall difference in cure rates between short and conventional courses of therapy was significant (6.38%; 95% CI: 1.88% to 10.89%), favoring the conventional course. Similar results were obtained when only studies comparing the same agents in the short and conventional courses were included (7.92%; 95% CI: 2.09% to 13.8%). Short-course amoxicillin was inferior to conventional length course (difference in cure rate, 13%; 95% CI: 4% to 24%); no difference was found between short-course and conventional length courses of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (difference in cure rate, 6.24%; 95% CI = -3.74% to 16.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that single-dose amoxicillin is inadequate therapy for uncomplicated cystitis of childhood. Three days of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole therapy appears to be as effective as conventional length courses of the drug.

Impact of Helicobacter pylori resistance to clarithromycin on the efficacy of the omeprazole-amoxicillin-clarithromycin therapy

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori resistance to clarithromycin is relatively frequent in France and is assumed to be the main cause of failure of the proton pump inhibitor-amoxicillin-clarithromycin (proton pump inhibitor-AC) therapy, which is the first-line regimen in France.

AIM

To determine the respective effects of clarithromycin primary and secondary resistances on efficacy of the proton pump inhibitor-AC regimen and to determine whether failures are associated with persistence of the same strain or with emergence of a new one.

METHODS

A total of 123 H. pylori-infected patients were treated for 7 days with omeprazole 20 mg b.d., amoxicillin 1 g b.d., and clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. Eradication was assessed by breath test in 102 patients. Minimal inhibitory concentrations of clarithromycin were determined by E-test. Strain genotyping was performed by random amplified polymorphic DNA.

RESULTS

The pre-treatment and post-treatment prevalences of clarithromycin resistance were 19% (23 out of 123) and 69% (nine out of 13), respectively. The rates of eradication were 68% (69 out of 102), 79% (67 out of 85), and 12% (two out of 17) for all, susceptible and resistant strains, respectively. The post-treatment isolate was available for six patients with a susceptible pre-treatment isolate and a persistent infection. Resistance emerged in two patients and was associated with persistence of the pre-treatment strain in one and with selection of a new strain in the other.

CONCLUSIONS

In our hospital, failures of the proton pump inhibitor-AC therapy are related to both clarithromycin primary and secondary resistances, but the emergence of secondary resistance does not explain all of the failures in the initial clarithromycin-susceptible group. In that group a new strain can emerge after failure.

How to treat Helicobacter pylori. First-line, second-line, and future therapies

Numerous trials were performed in the 1990s to define the optimal therapy for Helicobacter pylori infections. The proposed proton-pump inhibitor (PPI)-based and ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC)-based triple therapies led to satisfactory results. Their first drawback is cost, and, for this reason, many people worldwide cannot benefit from these regimens. Failures of first-line therapies essentially are because of antimicrobial resistance, which increases with the selection pressure resulting from the use of these drugs. Second-line treatments using antimicrobial agents for which H. pylori resistance is low or nonexistent are being tested to find alternatives to the quadruple therapy. There is a need for new drugs, which should be highly effective, nonselective of resistant strains, and without side effects, to improve current regimens. These drugs may be the results of postgenomic studies.

Triple therapy with clarithromycin, omeprazole, and amoxicillin for eradication of Helicobacter pylori in duodenal ulcer patients in Asia and Africa

BACKGROUND

Studies assessing the efficacy of triple therapy containing clarithromycin and amoxicillin for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection and healing of duodenal ulcers in Asian and African countries are limited.

AIM

To determine the efficacy and safety of 1-week triple therapy with omeprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin for eradicating H. pylori infection in patients with active duodenal ulcer living in Asian and African regions.

METHODS

This was an open-label, multicentre study in 11 centres in Asia and Africa. Patients with endoscopy-proven duodenal ulcer and who were H. pylori-positive were treated with clarithromycin 500 mg, omeprazole 20 mg, and amoxicillin 1000 mg, all given twice daily for 7 days. Upper endoscopy was repeated at week 6 to check for ulcer healing and H. pylori status.

RESULTS

A total of 117 patients were recruited. H. pylori eradication rates were 85% by per protocol analysis and 80% by intention-to-treat analysis. Ulcer healing was found in 94% of subjects (per protocol analysis). Clinical success, measured by change of pre-treatment ulcer symptoms, was strongly supported by complete resolution or improvement in 100% of the evaluable patients (per protocol analysis). Since treatment-related adverse events, when present, were largely mild or moderate, the triple therapy regimen was considered safe.

CONCLUSION

Seven-day triple therapy with omeprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin was efficacious for treating Asian and African patients with duodenal ulcer disease associated with H. pylori infection, and the treatment regimen was well-tolerated.

Helicobacter pylori infection in recurrent abdominal pain

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori is associated with chronic gastritis and peptic ulcer in adults and in children. The purpose of the present study was to analyze the association of recurrent abdominal pain and H. pylori infection in children and to evaluate the efficacy of antimicrobial treatment in patients with evidence of infection.

METHODS

The clinical and histopathologic findings in children who underwent diagnostic upper endoscopy for recurrent abdominal pain were analyzed retrospectively. Patients with evidence of infection with H. pylori were treated with a combination of omeprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin. Efficacy of treatment was assessed using the 13C-urea-breath test.

RESULTS

H. pylori was found in histopathologic sections of 29 (40%) of 73 patients undergoing diagnostic endoscopy for recurrent abdominal pain. Five children (17%) were of Swiss ethnic origin, and 24 (83%) were non-Swiss. All the infected patients had chronic gastritis and 4 (14%) had ulcerations in the duodenum. Treatment with omeprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin resulted in eradication of the infection in all and in resolution of the clinical symptoms in 15 (80%) of 19 patients who had a follow-up examination.

CONCLUSIONS

The presented data suggest that gastritis induced by H. pylori may be associated with recurrent abdominal pain and that in Switzerland infections with H. pylori primarily involve persons who are non-Swiss. A combined therapy results in eradication of the bacterium and in improvement of the clinical symptoms in a significant majority of the patients.

Where are We with current therapy?

Despite intensive research and widely publicized recommendations from consensus meetings in different continents, the public and primary care physicians are relatively slow in picking up the impact of Helicobacter pylori infection and identifying optimal therapies. The treatment of H. pylori infection has evolved from bismuth-containing regimens, 2-week proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-dual therapies, and now, the widely accepted PPI/ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC) single week triple therapies. There is a wealth of evidence showing that these regimens are highly efficacious and well tolerated by patients. The MACH-2 studies have confirmed that the addition of a PPI to two antimicrobials has significantly improved the cure rate of H. pylori infection and reduced the impact of antimicrobial resistance. Attempts to use shorter regimens ranging from 1 to 3 days should be resisted because of their unacceptably low therapeutic efficacy. In the United States, there are some indications that 10-14 days of treatment may be required. While the first-line therapies for H. pylori infection is well established, we are still struggling with the choice of optimal regimen in retreatment after the first attempt fails. Quadruple therapy combining PPI with bismuth, metronidazole and tetracycline has achieved a respectable success of around 85%. Switching between metronidazole and clarithromycin seems to be a sensible strategy as these two are the most effective anti-Helicobacter agents. Changing between PPI and RBC in the triple therapy would not make much difference without replacing some of the antimicrobials. Rifabutin-containing regimens and high-dose PPI-amoxicillin dual therapy deserve more studies with large-scale studies. Data on anti-Helicobacter therapy for children are few. Most studies based on bismuth derivatives in combination with amoxicillin or tinidazole and were limited by the small number of cases. Recent studies showed 1-week bismuth-based triple therapy and 2-week PPI-based triple therapy are highly efficacious. Reinfection in children > 5 years of age after successful cure is rare. It is worthwhile to refine the optimal therapy for children as the treatment of this group would, theoretically, prevent the development gastric cancer in the long term.

A meta-analysis of short versus long therapy with a proton pump inhibitor, clarithromycin and either metronidazole or amoxycillin for treating Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND

Although triple therapies with a proton pump inhibitor, clarithromycin and either amoxycillin or metronidazole are the most widely accepted treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection, there is no consensus on how long treatment should be maintained for.

AIM

To evaluate whether increasing the length of triple therapies beyond 7 days improves treatment efficacy.

METHODS

An extensive search of the literature was performed. Reports of randomized trials comparing different lengths of therapy were selected. Short (7-day) vs. long (10/14-day) therapies were compared, and three-way comparison of 7-day vs. 10-day, 10-day vs. 14-day and 7-day vs. 14-day therapies was performed. Meta-analysis was conducted using conventional shareware (Review Manager 4.0). The Peto Odds Ratio using a fixed model analysis was calculated for each comparison.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies were identified. Pooled 10- to 14-day therapies achieved better results than 7-day schedules. In head-to-head comparisons, only 14-day therapies were significantly better than 7-day treatments. Improvement in cure rates ranged from 7 to 9%. Comparisons of 7-day vs. 10-day and 10-day vs. 14-day also showed a non-significant trend towards better cure rates with longer therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

Fourteen-day, proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy achieves better results than 7-day schedules. Additional data are necessary to evaluate 10-day therapies.

Cure of Helicobacter pylori-positive active duodenal ulcer patients: a double-blind, multicentre, 12-month study comparing a two-week dual vs a one-week triple therapy. GISU (Interdisciplinary Group for Ulcer Study)

AIMS

To compare a two-week dual therapy to a one-week triple therapy for the healing of duodenal ulcer and the eradication of the Helicobacter pylori infection.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 165 patients with active duodenal ulcer were enrolled in the study. At entry, endoscopy, clinical examination and laboratory tests were performed. Histology and the rapid urease test were used to diagnose Helicobacter pylori infection. Patients received either lansoprazole 30 mg plus amoxycillin 1 g bid for two weeks (two-week, dual therapy) or lansoprazole 30 mg plus amoxycillin 1 g plus tinidazole 500 mg bid for one week plus lansoprazole qd for an additional week (one-week, triple therapy). Two and twelve months after cessation of therapy, endoscopy and clinical assessments were repeated.

RESULTS

Duodenal ulcer healing and Helicobacter pylori eradication were both significantly greater (p<0.0001) in the triple therapy group (healing: 98.6%; Helicobacter pylori cure rate: 72.6%) than in the dual therapy group (healing: 77.3%; Helicobacter pylori cure rate: 33.3%). Ulcers healed more frequently in Helicobacter pyloricured than in Helicobacter pylori-not cured patients (94.9% vs. 77.2%; p<0.0022). After one year, Helicobacter pylori eradication was re-confirmed in 46/58 patients previously treated with the triple therapy and in 10/40 patients treated with the dual therapy [p<0.0001]. Only three duodenal ulcer relapses were observed throughout follow-up: all were in Helicobacter pylori-not cured patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Triple therapy was more effective than dual both in curing Helicobacter pylori infection and healing active duodenal ulcers. The speed of ulcer healing obtained after only 7 days of antibiotics and 14 days of proton pump inhibitors confirmed that longer periods of anti ulcer therapy were not necessary. Helicobacter pylori -not cured patients had more slowly healing ulcers which were more apt to relapse when left untreated.

Eradication of H. pylori with pantoprazole, clarithromycin, and metronidazole in duodenal ulcer patients: a head-to-head comparison between two regimens of different duration

BACKGROUND

The study was conducted to compare the efficacy and tolerability of two pantoprazole-based triple therapies of different length in the eradication of H. pylori.

METHODS

In this double-blind, multicenter parallel group comparison, H. pylori-positive patients were randomly assigned to either the PCM-7 group (7 days of pantoprazole 40 mg bid, clarithromycin 500 mg bid, metronidazole 500 mg bid) or the PCM-14 m group (modified 14 day therapy of the same regimen with metronidazole only given for 10 days due to labeling reasons). H. pylori status was determined by urease test, histology, culture, and 13C-urea breath test. Treatment outcome was assessed 6 weeks after intake of the last study medication.

RESULTS

The following eradication rates were achieved: for PCM-7 in the MITT population 83% (89/107), in the PP population 84% (81/97); for PCM-14 m in MITT 87% (92/106), in PP 88% (91/104). Ulcer healing rates were: for PCM-7 in MITT population 99% (106/107), in the PP population 99% (96/97); for PCM-14 m in MITT 99% (105/106), in PP 99% (103/104). Gastrointestinal symptoms and gastritis scores decreased in both treatment groups. Equivalence of treatment regimens could be proven for all populations. In total, 64 patients reported adverse events. Five serious adverse events occurred, all unrelated to the study medication.

CONCLUSION

The two pantoprazole-based triple therapies tested in this study are equally effective in H. pylori eradication, ulcer healing and relief from ulcer pain. It is concluded that 7 days of triple therapy are generally sufficient.

Cure of Helicobacter pylori-associated ulcer disease through eradication

The eradication of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection has led to a dramatic benefit for patients with gastroduodenal ulcer disease, as the majority of these patients receive a lifelong cure. Relapses after successful H. pylori cure may be caused by either recrudescence or reinfection, both rare events nowadays, or be attributed to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or aspirin intake. In certain geographical areas, H. pylori-negative relapses are proposed as a new, pathophysiological and not yet elucidated entity. The cure of H. pylori infection in uncomplicated duodenal ulcer diseases consists of 7 days of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) based triple therapy, containing two antibiotics from clarithromycin, amoxicillin and metronidazole. In gastric ulcer, it is recommended that the PPI is continued for a further 3 weeks as these ulcers have a prolonged healing time. Rescue therapies after failure need to take into consideration the resistance pattern of the micro-organism and are offered in the form of quadruple therapy or a high-dose PPI with amoxicillin.

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection with proton pump-based triple therapy in patients in whom bismuth-based triple therapy failed

To study the effects of treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection in a hyperendemic population, 143 infected patients from the region of Nariño, Colombia, were treated for 2 weeks with clarithromycin (500 mg twice a day), amoxicillin (1 g twice a day), and either lansoprazole (30 mg twice a day) or omeprazole (30 mg twice a day). All patients belong to a low socioeconomic strata, had multifocal atrophic gastritis documented by gastric biopsies, and had been treated previously and unsuccessfully for 2 weeks with bismuth subsalicylate (262 mg four times a day), amoxicillin (500 mg three times a day), and metronidazole (400 mg three times a day). 13C-urea breath tests were performed 6, 12, 24, and 60 weeks after completing therapy. The 13C-urea breath test was negative in 79.7% of patients 1 month after finishing therapy, and in 69.2% of patients 1 year after finishing treatment. There were no differences in eradication rates between patients treated with omeprazole versus lansoprazole. Dyspepsia symptoms decreased from 74% in patients at baseline to 19% at the time of finishing treatment. In low-socioeconomic status populations with hyperendemic infection, triple therapy using omeprazole or lansoprazole plus clarithromycin and amoxicillin is an effective alternative when previous standard bismuth-based triple therapy has failed.

A practical approach to patients with refractory Helicobacter pylori infection, or who are re-infected after standard therapy

The vast majority of recurrences of Helicobacter pylori infection after apparent eradication are observed during the first year. Almost all of these early recurrences are due to recrudescence rather than reinfection by a new strain. After the first year, the recurrence rates approximate to the rate of natural acquisition of H. pylori infection. By contrast, in developing countries, higher rates of recurrence suggest a major role of real reinfection. Important predictive factors of H. pylori treatment success are compliance and bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics. The new 1-week triple therapies, based on a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and 2 antibiotics, lead to treatment discontinuation but rarely. If containing a nitroimidazole, their efficacy is reduced to 60 to 80% by pretreatment in vitro resistance. The prevalence of nitroimidazole resistance varies dependent on the geographical area, with rates over 50% in tropical regions. Resistance against macrolides hinders treatment success in 50 to 80% of patients. In the US, south-western Europe and Japan the prevalence of macrolide resistance amounts to about 10%, in other countries about 3%. After failed treatment, acquired resistance is frequent. Testing for resistance is recommended to facilitate the decision for an alternative triple therapy or for quadruple therapy comprising bismuth, metronidazole, tetracycline and a PPI. It seems reasonable to increase the dose of PPI in a retreatment regimen containing amoxicillin. Post-treatment double resistance against nitroimidazoles and macrolides reduces the success of most of the currently evaluated retreatment regimens. To overcome double resistance, high dose PPI plus amoxicillin is one approach, beside other experimental multidrug treatments.

Impact of rabeprazole, a new proton pump inhibitor, in triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection-comparison with omeprazole and lansoprazole

BACKGROUND

A recent trend in curative therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection is the so-called triple therapy, which consists of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and two different antimicrobials. Various regimens employing this triple therapy have been reported. However, little is known about the effectiveness of rabeprazole, a recently developed proton pump inhibitor, when used in the triple therapy.

AIM

To validate its usefulness by comparing rabeprazole with omeprazole and lansoprazole, in combination with amoxycillin and clarithromycin.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

221 H. pylori-positive patients with peptic ulcer disease were randomized to receive one of three different proton pump inhibitor/amoxycillin-clarithromycin (PPI/AC) regimens for 7 days. (i) OAC regimen (n = 75): omeprazole 20 mg b.d., amoxycillin (AMOX) 500 mg t.d.s. and clarithromycin (CAM) 200 mg b.d.; (ii) LAC regimen (n = 74): lansoprazole 30 mg b.d. , AMOX 500 mg t.d.s. and CAM 200 mg b.d.; and (iii) RAC regimen (n = 72): rabeprazole 20 mg b.d., AMOX 500 mg t.d.s. and CAM 200 mg b.d. Cure of the infection was determined by the 13C urea breath test 1 month after completion of the treatment.

RESULTS

Intention-to-treat based cure rates for OAC, LAC and RAC regimens were 85% (95% CI, 75-92), 84% (95%, CI 73-91) and 88% (95% CI, 78-94), respectively, and per protocol based cure rates of these regimens were 88% (95% CI, 78-94), 91% (95%, CI 82-99) and 93% (95% CI, 84-98), respectively. Adverse effects in the entire study population, which included diarrhoea, glossitis or skin rash, were reported by 15% of the patients, and complete compliance was achieved in 95% of these patients.

CONCLUSION

1-week proton pump inhibitor/AC regimens for H. pylori infection were effective in the Japanese population. Rabeprazole can be considered as equivalent to omeprazole and lansoprazole in the PPI/AC triple therapy.

The importance of clarithromycin dose in the management of Helicobacter pylori infection: a meta-analysis of triple therapies with a proton pump inhibitor, clarithromycin and amoxycillin or metronidazole

BACKGROUND

It is not clear which dose of clarithromycin (500 mg b.d. or 250 mg b.d.) is more effective for Helicobacter pylori eradication in proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapies.

METHODS

We undertook a meta-analysis of the effect of 7-day triple therapies consisting of a proton pump inhibitor (P), and clarithromycin (C) and amoxycillin (A) or metronidazole (M). A meta-analysis of all clinical trials performed in an adult population and published in English up to March 1998 was undertaken. Studies with doses of clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. or 250 mg b.d. only were included.

RESULTS

A total of 82 studies (31 papers and 51 abstracts) involving 110 treatment arms and 6123 patients were analysed that met the predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. In the PAC combination, the pooled eradication rate in patients treated with clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. was 89.5% (95% CI: 86.9-92. 0%) by per protocol analysis and 86.6% (95% CI: 81.0-89.3%) by intention-to-treat analysis. These rates are significantly higher than those achieved with clarithromycin 250 mg b.d. (83.3% by per protocol and 78.2% by intention-to-treat analysis, both P < 0.0001). This difference was confirmed in head-to-head comparative studies. In the PMC regimen, clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. eradicated 90.8% (95% CI: 87.0-94.5%) of the infections compared to 88.5% (95% CI: 85.5-91. 5%) in patients treated with clarithromycin 250 mg b.d. by per protocol analysis (P = 0.082). The corresponding rates by intention-to-treat analysis for clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. and 250 mg b.d. was 88.3% and 86.7%, respectively (P = 0.259).

CONCLUSIONS

Seven-day triple therapies with a proton pump inhibitor, clarithromycin and amoxycillin or metronidazole are highly effective treatments for the eradication of H. pylori. Clarithromycin 500 mg b. d. should be used in these combinations to achieve the best first treatment results, which can minimize the subsequent development of bacterial resistance to clarithromycin and metronidazole.

Effectiveness of ranitidine bismuth citrate, clarithromycin, and metronidazole therapy for treating Helicobacter pylori

OBJECTIVE

There are limited data available from the United States on the effectiveness of ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC) plus two antibiotics to treat Helicobacter pylori. Therefore, the following study was undertaken to evaluate RBC with two antibiotics, which have been used successfully in combination, to treat H. pylori.

METHODS

Adults with and without abdominal symptoms, who had never received H. pylori eradication therapy, were tested for the presence of H. pylori infection either by in-office rapid serology assays or histology. Positive subjects were administered the 13C-urea breath test. Subjects who had a positive urea breath test were then treated with RBC 400 mg b.i.d., clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d., and metronidazole 500 mg b.i.d. for 10 days. Four to 6 wk after completing antibiotics all subjects were asked to return for a second urea breath test to assess treatment success.

RESULTS

Forty-seven of the 50 subjects enrolled into this study completed the antibiotic regimen and returned for a repeat urea breath test. Thirty-seven subjects were negative for H. pylori by urea breath test and 10 were positive, resulting in a 79% eradication rate. Seven subjects (14%) stopped their medication because of side effects. When analysis was performed on the 40 subjects who took > or = 80% of their medication (per-protocol), the eradication rate was 90%.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of RBC with clarithromycin and metronidazole successfully treated H. pylori infection after only 10 days of therapy. The per-protocol eradication rate from this study was similar to that seen with Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved regimens. In conclusion, RBC plus clarithromycin and metronidazole should be considered as a first-line treatment regimen for H. pylori infection, and may only need to be taken for a period of 10 days, as opposed to 14 days for FDA-approved regimens.

Once-daily therapy for H. pylori infection: a randomized comparison of four regimens

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the efficacy and tolerability of novel, once-daily therapies in the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection.

METHODS

One hundred sixty subjects with H. pylori infection documented by endoscopic biopsy or serology plus 13C-urea breath test were randomly assigned to omeprazole 80 mg q.d. and metronidazole extended-release formulation 750 mg q.d. for 10 days (OM); OM plus amoxicillin 1.5 g q.d. for 10 days (OMAm); OM plus azithromycin 500 mg q.d. for 7 days (OMAz); or OM plus clarithromycin 1 g q.d. for 10 days (OMCI). A repeat breath test was done 6 wk after the completion of therapy. Subjects were considered compliant if they took > or = 80% of each study medication as prescribed.

RESULTS

Intent-to-treat eradication rates were OM = 8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2-20%), OMAm = 35% (95% CI, 21-52%), OMAz = 65% (95% CI, 48-79%), and OMCI = 78% (95% CI, 62-89%). Lack of compliance was seen in 5% of subjects given OM, 8% given OMAm, 3% given OMAz, and 15% given OMCI.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study demonstrated that once-daily triple therapy with high-dose omeprazole, metronidazole extended-release formulation, and clarithromycin achieved an eradication rate approaching 80%. Further study may permit development of optimal once-daily dosing and enhance eradication rates.

Enhancing compliance not a prerequisite for effective eradication of Helicobacter pylori: the HelP Study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare cure rates of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection, compliance, and side effects in patients given 10 days of omeprazole 20 mg b.d., amoxycillin 500 mg t.d.s., and metronidazole 400 mg t.d.s. (OAM) or 10 days OAM plus compliance enhancing measures.

METHODS

A total of 119 H. pylori-positive patients were prospectively randomized to receive either 10 days OAM or 10 days OAM plus compliance enhancing measures (medication in a dose dispensing unit, medication chart, an information sheet about H. pylori treatment, and phone call 2 days after starting therapy). H. pylori eradication was assessed by 13C-UBT at least 4 wk after cessation of therapy, compliance by phone interview on the last day of therapy and returned pill count, and side effects by phone interview and returned side effects form.

RESULTS

In 113 patients attending 13C-UBT H. pylori was eradicated in 51 of 57 patients (89.5%) after 10 days OAM and in 48 of 56 (85.7%) after 10 days OAM plus compliance enhancing measures (p = 0.54). In both groups 97% of medications were taken. Side effects were common (82% of patients). Both side effects (p = 0.001) and ulcer versus nonulcer at endoscopy (p = 0.016) were independent predictors of treatment failure; side effects also predicted noncompliance (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Ten days of OAM was effective for H. pylori eradication in our clinical population. Patient compliance was excellent and attempts to increase compliance had no impact on outcome or compliance. Side effects were very common and were significantly associated with treatment failure and decreased compliance.

Ranitidine bismuth citrate, tetracycline, clarithromycin twice-a-day triple therapy for clarithromycin susceptible Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND

Although many combination therapies have been proposed, there is still interest in identifying simple, inexpensive, effective protocols that have high rates of success.

AIM

To investigate the role of the new soluble form of bismuth, ranitidine bismuth citrate, in twice-a-day therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection.

METHODS

Patients with histologically and culture proven H. pylori infection received ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg, tetracycline HCl 500 mg, and clarithromycin 500 mg, each b.d. for 14 days, followed by 300 mg ranitidine once a day for 4 additional weeks. Outcome was assessed 4 or more weeks after the end of antimicrobial therapy by repeat endoscopy with histology and culture (49 patients) or urea breath testing (14 patients).

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients completed the therapy, 59 men and four women (average age 56.7 years; range 31-75 years). All patients had clarithromycin-susceptible strains prior to therapy. H. pylori infection was cured in 94% (95% CI: 85-98%). There was a therapy failure in one patient who took the medicine for only 1 day and stopped because of side-effects. Three of the isolates from treatment failures were available post-failure; two were clarithromycin-resistant and one was susceptible. Side-effects were severe in two patients (3%) and moderate in three (primarily diarrhoea).

CONCLUSIONS

Twice-a-day ranitidine bismuth citrate, tetracycline, clarithromycin triple therapy was well tolerated and effective for the treatment of H. pylori infection in patients with clarithromycin-susceptible H. pylori.

Optimal duration of therapy combining ranitidine bismuth citrate with clarithromycin and metronidazole in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND

Ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC) co-prescribed with clarithromycin and metronidazole for 1 week has been shown to be an effective eradicating regimen for Helicobacter pylori.

AIM

To determine the optimal duration of this regimen.

METHODS

A series of 165 dyspeptic patients were recruited for this randomized, open, parallel-group study. They were subdivided into three groups receiving RBC 400 mg b.d. plus clarithromycin 250 mg b.d. and metronidazole 500 mg b.d. for three different periods (4, 7 and 10 days). H. pylori infection was assessed by the concomitant positivity of CLO-test and histology performed at the pre-entry endoscopy. The bacterium was considered eradicated on the basis of a negative 13C-urea breath test performed at least 28 days after the completion of treatment.

RESULTS

The three subgroups were well matched and 16 patients dropped out of the study for many reasons (six in the 4-day, five in the 7-day and five in the 10-day treatment regimens). Intention-to-treat cure rates were 60%, 84% and 85%, and the per-protocol rates 67%, 92% and 94% in the 4-day, 7-day and 10-day treatment regimens, respectively. There was a significant difference, P = 0.003-0.006 on intention-to-treat and P = 0.001-0. 002 on per protocol analysis between the 4-day and the 7-day and the 4-day and the 10-day periods, respectively. The 7-day and 10-day periods did not differ from each other. Side-effects were reported in 9%, 14% and 20% of the 4-, 7- and 10-day regimens. They led to stopping treatment in four cases (one in the 7-day and three in the 10-day period). There was no statistical difference among them.

CONCLUSIONS

Reducing the duration of RBC-based triple therapy to 4 days provides a low and unacceptable rate of H. pylori eradication. As there is no difference between 7 and 10 days of treatment, 1 week represents the optimal time period for this kind of treatment, based on RBC plus two antibiotics.

Low- versus high-dose azithromycin triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND

We report a clinical trial which evaluated the effectiveness of triple therapy containing low- and high-dose azithromycin to treat Helicobacter pylori infection.

METHODS

From March 1997 to March 1998, patients infected with H. pylori were assigned to receive either: Treatment 1: ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC) (400 mg b.d.) and amoxycillin (1 g b.d.) for 10 days with azithromycin 500 mg o.m. for 3 days: or Treatment 2: RBC and amoxycillin for 10 days with azithromycin 1 g o.m. for 3 days. H. pylori eradication was established by a urea breath test at least 4 weeks after therapy. Side-effects and compliance were assessed using a diary.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight patients were enrolled. Fifty-seven per cent of patients were treated for active peptic ulcer disease or a history of peptic ulcer disease. Treatment 1 cured H. pylori in 44% and 44% by per protocol and intention-to-treat analysis, respectively. The corresponding eradication rates for Treatment 2 were 79% and 75%. Two patients taking Treatment 2 dropped out of the study because of side-effects.

CONCLUSIONS

With RBC and amoxycillin for 10 days, azithromycin at a dose of 1 g/day for 3 days was significantly better at curing H. pylori infection than azithromycin 500 mg/day for 3 days.