Low cure rate of Helicobacter pylori infection with omeprazole and furazolidone dual therapy for one week

Application of furazolidone in Helicobacter pylori infection eradication

Increasing antibiotic resistance is the primary reason for treatment failure of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. To enhance the eradication rate, minimize the development of secondary resistance, and alleviate the socioeconomic burden, it is crucial to select H. pylori-sensitive antibiotics carefully. Furazolidone has been used for H. pylori eradication in developing countries for decades due to its affordability and low resistance rate. Numerous studies have demonstrated that furazolidone-containing regimens are more efficacious than those containing other antibiotics, as both first- and second-line therapies, and are also well tolerated. However, utility of furazolidone is restricted or not optimal in certain countries due to its infrequent but potentially severe adverse effects. The decision to discontinue usage of furazolidone because of concerns regarding adverse effects may be misguided. Here we comprehensively reviewed the studies on furazolidone at different dosages and treatment durations for H. pylori eradication. Further research on the mechanisms of action and clinical trials of furazolidone are of great practical importance.

Safety of furazolidone-containing regimen in Helicobacter pylori infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Furazolidone containing regimen is effectivefor Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection, but its safetyremains controversial. To assess the safety of furazolidone containing regimenin H. pylori infection.

DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Scopus databases were systematically searched for eligible randomised controlled trials.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Studies comparing furazolidone with non-furazolidone-containing regimen, variable durations or doses of furazolidone were included.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two reviewers independently selected studies and extracted data. Primary outcomes were the risk of total adverse events (AEs), serious AEs and severe AEs, expressed as relative risk (RR) with 95% CI. Secondary outcomes contained the incidence of individual adverse symptoms, AE-related treatment discontinuation and compliance.

RESULTS

Twenty-six articles were identified from 2039 searched records, of which 14 studies (n=2540) compared furazolidone with other antibiotics. The eradication rates of furazolidone-containing regimen were higher than those of other antibiotics in both intention-to-treat (RR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.12) and per-protocol analysis (RR 1.05, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.10). Only two serious AEs were reported in furazolidone group (2/1221, 0.16%). No significant increased risk was observed for the incidence of total AEs (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.21) and severe AEs (RR 1.81, 95% CI 0.91 to 3.60). Twelve studies (n=3139) compared different durations of furazolidone, and four studies (n=343) assessed variable doses. Elevated risk of total AEs and severe AEs were only found in a high daily dose of furazolidone rather than prolonged duration. The incidence of AE-related treatment discontinuation and compliance of patients were all similar, irrespective of dose and duration adjustments.

CONCLUSION

Furazolidone-containing regimen has a similar risk of AEs and compliance as non-furazolidone-containing regimen. A low daily dose of 200 mg is well-tolerated for 14 day regimen and should be first considered.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42019137247.

Effectiveness and safety of furazolidone-containing quadruple regimens in patients with Helicobacter pylori infection in real-world practice

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) has decreased largely because of the antibiotic resistance. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of furazolidone-containing quadruple regimens for H pylori eradication.

METHODS

This was an observational study of furazolidone-containing quadruple regimens for H pylori infection in real-world settings. Data sets were collected from the medical records and telephone interviews of patients referred to a specialist clinic for suspected H pylori reinfection from January 1, 2015, to January 1, 2018, at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University. Main outcome measures were the eradication rate and adverse reactions during medication.

RESULTS

Among 584 patients with H pylori infection that met the inclusion criteria, 561 (96.1%) were treated for the first time, 19 (3.3%) had one, and 4 (0.5%) had two or more prior to furazolidone-containing quadruple regimens. The eradication rates for 10-day and 14-day regimens were 93.7% (95% CI: 91.5%-95.9%) vs 98.2% (95% CI: 95.6%-99.3%), respectively (P = 0.098). Adverse drug reactions occurred in 8.2% (48/584) with abdominal discomfort being the most common symptom. Overall adverse events with 10-day regimens were lower than 14-day regimens (6.1% vs 17.4%, P < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis indicated that poor adherence (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 46.5, 95% CI: 9.7-222.4) was correlated with failed eradication. Adverse drug reactions during medication were related to smoking and tobacco status, alcohol intake history, regimens combined with tetracycline, and poor adherence (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Furazolidone-containing quadruple regimens proved both safe and highly effective in a real-world setting.

Furazolidone-based therapies for Helicobacter pylori infection: a pooled-data analysis

BACKGROUND/AIM

Furazolidone-based therapies are used in developing countries to cure Helicobacter pylori infection due to its low cost. The low bacterial resistance toward furazolidone may render appealing the use of this drug even in developed countries. However, some relevant safety concerns do exist in using furazolidone.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a systematic review with pooled-data analysis of data regarding both eradication rate and safety of furazolidone-based therapies for H. pylori infection. Intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) eradication rates were calculated.

RESULTS

Following furazolidone-based first-line therapy, H. pylori eradication rates were 75.7% and 79.6% at ITT and PP analysis, respectively (P<0.001). The overall incidence of side effects and severe side effects were 33.2% and 3.8%, respectively. At multivariate analysis, only high-dose furazolidone was associated with increased therapeutic success (OR: 1.5, 95% CI: 1.3-2.7; P<0.001), while occurrence of side effects was relevant following treatment for a long duration (OR: 2.9, 95% CI: 2.2-4.1; P<0.001), high-dose furazolidone (OR: 2.3, 95% CI: 1.7-3.2; P<0.001) and bismuth-containing regimens (OR: 2.1, 95% CI: 1.5-2.8; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Furazolidone-based regimens usually achieve low eradication rates. Only a high-dose regimen improves the cure rate, but simultaneously increases the incidence of severe side effects. Therefore, we suggest that patients have to be clearly informed about the possible genotoxic and carcinogenetic effects for which furazolidone use is not approved in developed countries.

Short-duration furazolidone therapy in combination with amoxicillin, bismuth subcitrate, and omeprazole for eradication of Helicobacter pylori

BACKGROUND/AIM

Resistance to metronidazole is one of the most common reasons for Helicobacter pylori treatment failure with the classic triple therapy. The clarithromycin-based regimen is not cost-effective for use in developing countries. Though furazolidone is a great substitute it has many side effects. Decreasing the duration of treatment with furazolidone to 1 week may help decrease the drug's side effects.

AIM

To study the efficacy and side effects of furazolidone when given for 1 week in combination with bismuth subcitrate, amoxicillin, and omeprazole.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and seventy-seven patients with duodenal ulcer were randomly divided into two groups. Group I received omeprazole 2 Chi 20 mg + amoxicillin 2 Chi 1 g + bismuth subcitrate 4 Chi 120 mg for 2 weeks, with furazolidone 2 Chi 200 mg in the first week only. Group II received the same regimen, except that 1 week of furazolidone was followed by 1 week of metronidazole in the second week. Control endoscopy was performed after 6 weeks. Three biopsies from the antrum and three from the corpus were taken for urease testing and histology. Eradication was concluded if all tests were negative for H pylori.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifty-seven patients completed the study. Two subjects from group I and three from group II did not tolerate the regimen and were excluded from the analysis. No serious complication was detected in any patient. The eradication rates by per-protocol (PP) analysis and intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis were 89% and 79.3% in group I and 86.6% and 74.4% in group II, respectively.

CONCLUSION

One week of furazolidone in combination with 2 weeks of amoxicillin, omeprazole, and bismuth subcitrate is a safe and cost-effective regimen for the eradication of H pylori. Adding metronidazole to the above regimen does not increase the eradication rate.

Nitrofuran-based regimens for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection

Several aspects of Helicobacter pylori eradication have been meta-analyzed; however, nitrofuran-based therapies constitute an exception. The aim of this study was the systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of furazolidone- and nitrofurantoin-based regimens in the eradication of infection. Studies evaluating the effects of nitrofurans on H. pylori were identified from Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and congress abstracts. The studies were classified into groups based on first-, second- and third-line regimens. The pooled eradication rates and combined odd ratios of the individual studies were calculated and compared with the published meta-analysis. The factors influencing the efficiency of the regimens were also analyzed. Side-effects of nitrofuran-based regimens were also analyzed. The pooled eradication rate of primary proton pump inhibitor-based regimens containing furazolidone was 76.3% (CI 67.8-84.2). The odds ratio for furazolidone-based regimens versus standard triple therapies was 2.34 (CI 0.76-3.92). Ranitidine bismuth citrate + furazolidone-based triple regimens were equally efficient (83.5%, CI 74.0-93.0, P = 0.06 versus triple therapies). Schedules including a H(2) antagonist + furazolidone + one other antibiotic achieved pooled eradication rates of 79.9% (CI 67.8-89.9, P = 0.04). Bismuth-based triple therapies achieved 84.5% (CI 72.6-93.0, P = 0.002). Primary quadruple regimens containing furazolidone were superior to triple therapies (83.4%, CI 69.7-92.3, P = 0.01). Second-line schedules containing furazolidone obtained eradication rates of 76.1% (CI 66.4-85.0, P = 0.28 versus primary regimens). Third-line 'rescue' therapies were efficient in 65.5% of the cases (CI 56.3-75.5, P = 0.0001). Side-effects of the regimens containing furazolidone were more frequent than in standard therapies (P = 0.02). The combined odds ratio of side-effects for furazolidone-based versus standard therapies was 0.74 (CI 0.32-1.98). The duration of treatment, but not the furazolidone dose, influenced the treatment outcome. Primary triple regimens containing furazolidone are slightly less efficient than the standard primary combinations; primary quadruple regimens were more efficient than triple therapies. Furazolidone is also efficient as a component of second-line or rescue therapies.

Effect of different doses of furazolidone with amoxicillin and omeprazole on eradication of Helicobacter pylori

BACKGROUND

Resistance to metronidazole is one of the most common reasons for Helicobacter pylori treatment failure with classic triple therapy. In contrast, the clarithromycin-based regimen is not cost-effective for developing countries. Furazolidone is a very good substitute for metronidazole and clarithromycin, but its many side-effects limit widespread use. The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy of two different doses of furazolidone in combination with amoxycillin and omeprazole.

METHODS

A total of 123 patients with duodenal ulcer were randomized and received the following medications for two weeks. Group A: furazolidone 2 x 200 mg + amoxycillin 2 x 1 g + omeprazole 2 x 20 mg/day. Group B: furazolidone 2 x 50 mg + amoxycillin 2 x 1 g + omeprazole 2 x 20 mg/day. Control endoscopy was performed after 6 weeks and two biopsy specimens from the antrum and two from the corpus were taken for a urease test and histology. Eradication was concluded if all tests were negative for H. pylori.

RESULTS

In total, 110 patients completed the study. Four patients in group A did not tolerate the regimen on day 8 of therapy and were excluded from the study. Serious complications such as fever, and fatigue and dizziness, which occurred in the beginning of the second week of treatment (days 8-10), were more common in group A than in group B (19%, 15.9% and 14.3%, respectively, in group A vs 0% in group B). The eradication rate by per protocol analysis was significantly higher in group A than in group B (88.9%vs 67.9%, respectively, P = 0.008). However, this difference was low and not statistically significant by intention-to-treat analysis (76.2% in group A and 62.3% in group B, P = 0.09).

CONCLUSION

The regimen with a non-reduced dose of furazolidone in combination with amoxycillin and omeprazole was effective when the patients tolerated the drugs and completed the study.

Factors associated with treatment failure of Helicobacter pylori infection in a developing country

BACKGROUND

Although no regimen can eradicate in 100% of patients, factors that may affect the eradication rates have been poorly studied.

GOAL

To evaluate factors associated with treatment failure.

STUDY

One hundred patients were treated with pantoprazole plus clarithromycin and furazolidone for eradication. Clarithromycin and furazolidone resistance was evaluated by the agar dilution method. Point mutations in 23S rRNA genes related to clarithromycin resistance were investigated by polymerase chain reaction and restriction length fragment polymorphism and A by polymerase chain reaction. The data were analyzed by logistic regression.

RESULTS

eradication occurred in 85 of 97 patients who completed the treatment (87.6%; 95% CI = 79.0-93.1). All strains were susceptible to furazolidone, and nine were resistant to clarithromycin (A2142G or A2143G mutation was detected in all of them). The treatment failure was significant and independently associated with clarithromycin resistance (OR = 7.79; 95% CI = 1.73-35.01), A-negative status (OR = 4.81; 95% CI = 1.14-20.14), and male gender (OR = 4.20; 95% CI = 1.01-17.78), but not with the type of disease, mean age, smoking, alcohol consumption, and the degree of the antral and oxyntic gastritis.

CONCLUSION

Resistance to clarithromycin, A-negative status, and gender were predictive factors of eradication failure.

Amoxicillin and ampicillin are not transferred to gastric juice irrespective of Helicobacter pylori status or acid blockade by omeprazole

BACKGROUND

The effects of proton pump inhibitors and Helicobacter pylori infection on the distribution of drugs used for the eradication of the bacteria are poorly understood.

AIM

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of a 7-day administration of 20 mg of omeprazole on the pharmacokinetics of amoxicillin and ampicillin in the plasma, saliva and gastric juice of individuals with and without H. pylori infection.

METHODS

Fifty-four healthy volunteers without endoscopic lesions were enrolled. Twenty-six volunteers were included in the amoxicillin study and 28 individuals in the ampicillin study. Each study had an open randomized two-period crossover design and a 21-day washout period between phases. Plasma, saliva and gastric juice concentrations of amoxicillin and ampicillin in subjects with and without omeprazole pre-treatment were measured by reversed-phase HPLC using UV detection.

RESULTS

Neither pre-treatment with omeprazole nor H. pylori infection interfered with the plasma bioavailability of amoxicillin or ampicillin, as assessed by the AUC0-2 h. Neither ampicillin nor amoxicillin were detected in saliva or gastric juice in any study phase.

CONCLUSION

Short-term treatment with omeprazole does not interfere with the pharmacokinetics of amoxicillin or ampicillin. Our results also exclude the presence of a transfer mechanism for amoxicillin or ampicillin from the plasma to the gastric lumen.

Review article: alternative antibacterial agents for Helicobacter pylori eradication

Standard eradication therapies against Helicobacter pylori appear to be effective in most cases, but in clinical practice a failure rate higher than the 5-10% reported in clinical trials is often observed. Among the various reasons responsible for therapeutic failure, antibiotic resistance is becoming a major issue in some countries. A range of different antibacterial agents is currently under investigation: several macrolides, new fluoroquinolones, furazolidone and rifabutin. Although not formally tested in refractory cases, azithromycin, spiromycin, levofloxacin and furazolidone represent the most promising antibacterial agents for possible inclusion in eradication regimens. Rifabutin has been evaluated in H. pylori infections resistant to standard therapies. Although very effective, the drug is expensive and its use should be restricted to the most difficult cases to avoid the development of rifabutin resistance in Mycobacterium spp.

Effect of acid secretion blockade by omeprazole on the relative bioavailability of orally administered furazolidone in healthy volunteers

AIMS

The administration of omeprazole may interfere with the absorption of orally administered drugs by reducing gastric pH and hence tablet dissolution. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of a 5 day administration of omeprazole on the pharmacokinetics of furazolidone.

METHODS

Eighteen healthy (nine male and nine female) volunteers were selected. The study had an open randomized two-period crossover design with a 21 day washout period between the phases. Serum concentrations of furazolidone were measured by reversed-phase h.p.l.c. with ultraviolet detection.

RESULTS

Administration of omeprazole caused a significant reduction of Cmax [0.34 microg x ml(-1) (range 0.25-0.43) vs 0.24 microg x ml(-1) (range 0.15-0.34)] with no significant delay in absorption tmax [2.5 h (range 1.85-3.0) vs 2.4 h (range 2.06-2.71)].

CONCLUSIONS

Furazolidone was rapidly absorbed after oral administration. Short-term treatment with omeprazole did alter the relative bioavailability of this drug, probably through an effect on absorption kinetics or first-pass metabolism.

A multicentre study on eradication of Helicobacter pylori using four 1-week triple therapies in China

BACKGROUND

Short-term proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapies for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori are used widely. The eradication rates vary greatly from country to country and from region to region.

AIM

To assess the efficacy at eradicating H. pylori of 1-week regimens containing three medications: omeprazole (O) or colloidal bismuth subcitrate (B), furazolidone (F) or metronidazole (M), and amoxicillin (A) or clarithromycin (C).

METHODS

A multicentre study involving 20 hospitals in different regions of China. A total of 892 patients with H. pylori-positive non-ulcer dyspepsia or healed duodenal ulcer confirmed by endoscopy were recruited to receive, randomly, one of four regimens: OMC, OFC, OFA, and BFC, b.d. for 7 days. 13C-urea breath test was performed 4-8 weeks after completion of treatment.

RESULTS

The eradication rates with per protocol/intention-to-treat analyses were: OMC (n=217/219) 66%/65%; OFC (n=227/229) 69%/69%; OFA (n=223/225) 87%/86%; and BFC (n=214/219) 80%/78%. The eradication rate (per protocol analysis) in duodenal ulcer (79%) was higher than that in non-ulcer dyspepsia (73%, P=0.033). Patient compliance was good. The adverse events of the four regimens were mild, and mainly gastrointestinal.

CONCLUSIONS

The omeprazole, furazolidine and amoxicillin regimen achieves a high H. pylori eradication rate in different geographical regions of China.

Furazolidone combination therapies for Helicobacter pylori infection in the United States

BACKGROUND

Antibiotic resistance has begun to impair the ability to cure Helicobacter pylori infection.

AIM

To evaluate furazolidone as a component of combination therapies for treatment of H. pylori infection in the United States.

METHODS

Patients with active H. pylori infection received furazolidone combination therapy for 14 days (furazolidone 100 mg and tetracycline 500 mg t.d.s.; omeprazole 20 mg o.d. in the morning and, depending on the pre-treatment antimicrobial susceptibility pattern, 500 mg of metronidazole or clarithromycin t.d.s.).

RESULTS

A total of 27 patients received the metronidazole containing combination (cure rate 100%) and seven received the clarithromycin combination (cure rate 86%). Overall the cure rates for intention-to-treat was 97% (95% CI: 85% to 100%). The single failure took the clarithromycin containing combination for only 2 days (per protocol cure rate = 100%). Side-effects were common and led to discontinuation of therapy in 26% of patients. An attempt to eliminate metronidazole and clarithromycin and use furazolidone, tetracycline, and lansoprazole b.d. produced an unsatisfactory cure rate of 72%.

CONCLUSION

Furazolidone combination therapy appears to be effective. Additional studies with different antimicrobial combinations and duration of therapy are warranted.

Review article: nitroimidazole resistance in Helicobacter pylori

The efficacy of a nitroimidazole-containing regimen for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection is decreased by nitroimidazole resistance. Nitroimidazoles are meta- bolized by H. pylori by several nitro-reductases of which an oxygen-insensitive NADPH nitroreductase encoded by the rdxA gene is the most important. Null mutations in this gene are associated with resistance. Susceptibility testing to nitroimidazoles may give variable results. This is not only related to the slow growth under specific conditions, but also to variability in the activity of the other nitroreductases and the ability to deactivate toxic metabolites of an NI and to repair DNA damage. Moreover, co-infections with resistant and susceptible bacteria are frequently found. The presence of nitroimidazole resistance is related to the previous use of this drug. The prevalence of resistance is rising and nowadays 10-50% of the isolates are resistant. Resistance reduces the efficacy of a treatment regimen to a variable degree. This is related to efficacy of the other components of the regimen and the treatment duration. Whether a nitroimidazole is still effective in resistant strains remains unresolved. When nitroimidazole resistance is present, a nitro-imidazole-containing regimen should be avoided or a regimen with other highly effective components should be used.

Omeprazole, clarithromycin and furazolidone for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori in patients with duodenal ulcer

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of omeprazole plus clarithromycin and furazolidone in Helicobacter pylori eradication and duodenal ulcer healing in Brazilian patients.

METHODS

Forty H. pylori-positive patients with duodenal ulcer were randomized to receive 20 mg omeprazole o.m. or b.d. for 1 month plus 500 mg clarithromycin (b.d. ) and 200 mg furazolidone (b.d.) for 1 week.

RESULTS

Three months after the end of the treatment the eradication rates were 90% by intention-to-treat analysis, and 97% by per protocol analysis. Mild side-effects were observed in 25 patients, none of whom abandoned the protocol. No difference was observed between the 20 mg and 40 mg omeprazole daily doses. Cure or significant improvement of the symptoms and of the histological alterations were observed after H. pylori eradication.

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate that clarithromycin and furazolidone in combination with omeprazole are a good alternative for H. pylori eradication in Brazilian patients with duodenal ulcer.

Pharmacological, therapeutic and toxicological properties of furazolidone: some recent research

Some of the recent publications on the pharmacological, therapeutic and toxicological properties of the antimicrobial agent furazolidone (FZ) are briefly reviewed. In animals, most of the recently published papers focus on (1) the methodology of measuring the residues of the drug and its metabolites in edible tissues; (2) the carcinogenicity and genotoxicity of FZ; (3) the cellular and molecular basis of FZ-induced cardiomyopthy, and the action of different cardioprotectant drugs thereon; and (4) hormonal effects. In humans, the use of FZ as an anti-ulcer drug and in controlling infectious diseases, especially opportunistic infections in AIDS patients, is described.

A practical approach to patients with refractory Helicobacter pylori infection, or who are re-infected after standard therapy

The vast majority of recurrences of Helicobacter pylori infection after apparent eradication are observed during the first year. Almost all of these early recurrences are due to recrudescence rather than reinfection by a new strain. After the first year, the recurrence rates approximate to the rate of natural acquisition of H. pylori infection. By contrast, in developing countries, higher rates of recurrence suggest a major role of real reinfection. Important predictive factors of H. pylori treatment success are compliance and bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics. The new 1-week triple therapies, based on a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and 2 antibiotics, lead to treatment discontinuation but rarely. If containing a nitroimidazole, their efficacy is reduced to 60 to 80% by pretreatment in vitro resistance. The prevalence of nitroimidazole resistance varies dependent on the geographical area, with rates over 50% in tropical regions. Resistance against macrolides hinders treatment success in 50 to 80% of patients. In the US, south-western Europe and Japan the prevalence of macrolide resistance amounts to about 10%, in other countries about 3%. After failed treatment, acquired resistance is frequent. Testing for resistance is recommended to facilitate the decision for an alternative triple therapy or for quadruple therapy comprising bismuth, metronidazole, tetracycline and a PPI. It seems reasonable to increase the dose of PPI in a retreatment regimen containing amoxicillin. Post-treatment double resistance against nitroimidazoles and macrolides reduces the success of most of the currently evaluated retreatment regimens. To overcome double resistance, high dose PPI plus amoxicillin is one approach, beside other experimental multidrug treatments.

Furazolidone-containing short-term triple therapies are effective in the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND

A furazolidone-containing therapeutic regimen for Helicobacter pylori infection has attracted special interest in the face of a rising world-wide metronidazole resistant H. pylori, and the expense of currently used antimicrobial regimens.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of furazolidone-containing regimens in eradicating H. pylori.

METHODS

One-hundred and forty H. pylori positive patients with endoscopically confirmed duodenal ulcer or functional dyspepsia received one of four different regimens to eradicate H. pylori. In the first trial, the patients were randomly assigned to receive a 1-week course of furazolidone 100 mg b.d. and clarithromycin 250 mg b.d., with either tripotassium dicitrato bismuthate (TDB) 240 mg b.d. (FCB group) or lansoprazole 30 mg daily (FCL group). In the second trial, the patients were randomly assigned to receive a 1-week course of clarithromycin 250 mg b.d. and omeprazole 20 mg daily, with either furazolidone 100 mg b.d. (FCO group) or metronidazole 400 mg b.d. (MCO group). Endoscopy was repeated 4 weeks following completion of therapy with re-assessment of H. pylori status on gastric biopsies by histology and culture.

RESULTS

Four patients (1 in FCB, 1 in FCO and 2 in MCO groups) dropped out because they refused a follow-up endoscopy. Eradication rates of H. pylori on an intention-to-treat basis in the FCB, FCL, FCO and MCO groups were 91% (32/35, 95% CI: 82-99%), 91% (32/35, CI: 82-99%), 86% (30/35, CI: 74-97%) and 74% (26/35, CI: 60-89%) (all P > 0.05), respectively. Mild side-effects occurred in 15% of the 140 patients. In MCO group, the eradication rate in the patients infected with metronidazole-sensitive isolates of H. pylori was 86%, but dropped to 67% in those with metronidazole-resistance strains (P = 0.198).

CONCLUSION

One-week regimens containing furazolidone and clarithromycin in combination with TDB or a proton pump inhibitor fulfil the criteria for successful H. pylori therapy.