Review article: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-associated gastrointestinal complications--guidelines for prevention and treatment

Retrospective evaluation of the incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding in dogs receiving ophthalmic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

OBJECTIVES

To report the incidence of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding and associated risk factors in a population of dogs receiving ophthalmic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

ANIMAL STUDIED

Medical records of dogs prescribed ophthalmic NSAIDs (cases), dogs receiving systemic NSAIDs alone and dogs receiving systemic prednisone alone (controls).

PROCEDURES

Data were collected retrospectively from the medical records of 204 dogs prescribed ophthalmic NSAIDs (diclofenac, ketorolac, or flurbiprofen), which were subdivided based on if they received any concurrent systemic NSAIDs or glucocorticoids, 136 dogs receiving a systemic NSAID (carprofen or meloxicam) alone, and 151 dogs receiving a systemic glucocorticoid (prednisone) alone at a referral hospital from 2015 to 2019.

RESULTS

Gastrointestinal bleeds developed in 8/79 (10.1%) of topical NSAID-only cases, 10/136 (7.4%) of systemic NSAID controls, and 14/151 (9.3%) of systemic glucocorticoid controls, with no significant difference between the three groups (p = .6103). There were no significant differences in GI bleed rates between cases treated with ketorolac, diclofenac, or flurbiprofen (p = .160), although severe GI bleeding was only seen in ketorolac-treated dogs. Presence of a known concurrent risk factor for GI bleeding was significantly associated with the development of GI bleed in dogs on ophthalmic NSAIDs (p = .032).

CONCLUSIONS

Dogs treated with ophthalmic NSAIDs developed GI bleeding at a frequency comparable to dogs receiving systemic NSAIDs or systemic glucocorticoids alone, suggesting that dogs receiving ophthalmic NSAIDs may be at increased risk of GI bleeding.

Older age and diclofenac are associated with increased risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in gout patients

Background

Gouty arthritis is a disease of global burden in which defective metabolism of uric acid causes arthritis. Gouty arthritis or medications used for its treatment may lead to uric acid-associated complications such as upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) and renal impairment.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study with retrospective record review, 403 established gouty arthritis patients were recruited to determine the incidence of UGIB and associated factors among gout patients who were on regular nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

Results

The mean age of the 403 gouty arthritis patients was 55.7 years old and the majority (n = 359/403; 89.1%) were male. The incidence of UGIB among gouty arthritis patients who were on NSAIDs was 7.2% (n = 29/403). Older age (p < 0.001), diclofenac medication (p = 0.003), pantoprazole medication (p = 0.003), end-stage renal failure (ESRF) (p = 0.007), smoking (p = 0.035), hypertension (p = 0.042) and creatinine (p = 0.045) were significant risk factors for UGIB among the gouty arthritis patients in univariable analysis. Older age (p = 0.001) and diclofenac medication (p < 0.001) remained significant risk factors for UGIB among the gouty arthritis patients in multivariable analysis.

Conclusions

Age and diclofenac were significantly associated with UGIB among patients with gouty arthritis on regular NSAIDs, indicating that these factors increased the risks of developing UGIB in gout patients. Hence, these high-risk groups of gouty arthritis patients should be routinely monitored to avoid the potential onset of UGIB. Our data also suggest that diclofenac should be prescribed for the shortest duration possible to minimize the risk of developing UGIB in gout patients.

Prevalence of gastrointestinal lesions in dogs chronically treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

BACKGROUND

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the most common pharmaceutical associated with gastroduodenal ulceration and perforation. The prevalence of gastrointestinal (GI) injury associated with chronic use of NSAIDs in dogs is unknown.

OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS

To determine the prevalence of GI mucosal erosions in dogs receiving chronic treatment with NSAIDs. We hypothesized that dogs receiving NSAIDs would have more GI mucosal erosions and longer GI transit time than a control population.

ANIMALS

Fourteen client-owned medium- and large-breed dogs receiving an NSAID for at least 30 days and 11 client-owned control dogs undergoing video capsule endoscopy (VCE) for evaluation of chronic GI disease.

METHODS

Dogs were prospectively recruited after determining no clinically relevant comorbidities were present and VCE was performed. The GI transit time and the presence of mucosal lesions were recorded.

RESULTS

Twelve dogs receiving NSAIDs and 11 retrospectively evaluated control dogs were included. The NSAIDs administered included carprofen (9 dogs), meloxicam (2 dogs), and firocoxib (1 dog) for a median of 6 months. Ten (83.3%; 95% confidence interval; 51.6%-97.9%) NSAID-treated dogs had GI erosions. Erosions were seen with all 3 NSAIDs in at least 1 dog. Three of 11 control dogs had gastric erosions. Dogs receiving NSAIDs had more erosions detected (P = .004).

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Subclinical GI erosions are more common in dogs receiving chronic treatment with NSAIDs than in control dogs with chronic GI disease, suggesting that NSAIDs be used with caution, particularly in dogs with comorbidities predisposing them to GI ulceration.

COX Inhibition Increases Alternaria-Induced Pulmonary Group 2 Innate Lymphoid Cell Responses and IL-33 Release in Mice

The cyclooxygenase (COX) metabolic pathway regulates immune responses and inflammation. The effect of the COX pathway on innate pulmonary inflammation induced by protease-containing fungal allergens, such as Alternaria alternata, is not fully defined. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that COX inhibition augments Alternaria-induced pulmonary group 2 innate lymphoid cell (ILC2) responses and IL-33 release. Mice were treated with the COX inhibitors indomethacin, flurbiprofen, or vehicle and challenged intranasally with Alternaria extract for four consecutive days to induce innate lung inflammation. We found that indomethacin and flurbiprofen significantly increased the numbers of ILC2 and IL-5 and IL-13 expression by ILC2 in the lung. Indomethacin also increased ILC2 proliferation, the percentages of eosinophils, and mucus production in the lung. Both indomethacin and flurbiprofen augmented the release of IL-33 in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid after Alternaria challenge, suggesting that more IL-33 was available for ILC2 activation and that a COX product(s) inhibited IL-33 release. This is supported by the in vitro finding that the COX product PGE₂ and the PGI₂ analogs cicaprost decreased Alternaria extract-induced IL-33 release by human bronchial epithelial cells. Although contrasting effects of PGD₂, PGE₂, and PGI₂ on ILC2 responses have been previously reported, the overall effect of the COX pathway on ILC2 function is inhibitory in Alternaria-induced innate airway inflammation.

Adverse drug reactions and drug-drug interactions with over-the-counter NSAIDs

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) such as ibuprofen have a long history of safe and effective use as both prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) analgesics/antipyretics. The mechanism of action of all NSAIDs is through reversible inhibition of cyclooxygenase enzymes. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) including gastrointestinal bleeding as well as cardiovascular and renal effects have been reported with NSAID use. In many cases, ADRs may occur because of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between the NSAID and a concomitant medication. For example, DDIs have been reported when NSAIDs are coadministered with aspirin, alcohol, some antihypertensives, antidepressants, and other commonly used medications. Because of the pharmacologic nature of these interactions, there is a continuum of risk in that the potential for an ADR is dependent on total drug exposure. Therefore, consideration of dose and duration of NSAID use, as well as the type or class of comedication administered, is important when assessing potential risk for ADRs. Safety findings from clinical studies evaluating prescription-strength NSAIDs may not be directly applicable to OTC dosing. Health care providers can be instrumental in educating patients that using OTC NSAIDs at the lowest effective dose for the shortest required duration is vital to balancing efficacy and safety. This review discusses some of the most clinically relevant DDIs reported with NSAIDs based on major sites of ADRs and classes of medication, with a focus on OTC ibuprofen, for which the most data are available.

Safe prescribing of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in patients with osteoarthritis--an expert consensus addressing benefits as well as gastrointestinal and cardiovascular risks

BACKGROUND

There are several guidelines addressing the issues around the use of NSAIDs. However, none has specifically addressed the upper versus lower gastrointestinal (GI) risk of COX-2 selective and non-selective compounds nor the interaction at both the GI and cardiovascular (CV) level of either class of drugs with low-dose aspirin. This Consensus paper aims to develop statements and guidance devoted to these specific issues through a review of current evidence by a multidisciplinary group of experts.

METHODS

A modified Delphi consensus process was adopted to determine the level of agreement with each statement and to determine the level of agreement with the strength of evidence to be assigned to the statement.

RESULTS

For patients with both low GI and CV risks, any non-selective NSAID (ns-NSAID) alone may be acceptable. For those with low GI and high CV risk, naproxen may be preferred because of its potential lower CV risk compared with other ns-NSAIDs or COX-2 selective inhibitors, but celecoxib at the lowest approved dose (200 mg once daily) may be acceptable. In patients with high GI risk, if CV risk is low, a COX-2 selective inhibitor alone or ns-NSAID with a proton pump inhibitor appears to offer similar protection from upper GI events. However, only celecoxib will reduce mucosal harm throughout the entire GI tract. When both GI and CV risks are high, the optimal strategy is to avoid NSAID therapy, if at all possible.

CONCLUSIONS

Time is now ripe for offering patients with osteoarthritis the safest and most cost-effective therapeutic option, thus preventing serious adverse events which could have important quality of life and resource use implications. Please see related article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0291-x.

Analgesic properties of a peripherally acting and GalR2 receptor-preferring galanin analog in inflammatory, neuropathic, and acute pain models

There are ongoing efforts to develop pain therapeutics with novel mechanisms of action that avoid common side effects associated with other analgesics. The anticonvulsant neuropeptide galanin is a potent regulator of neuronal excitability and has a well established role in pain modulation, making it a potential target for novel therapies. Our previous efforts focused on improving blood-brain-barrier penetration and enhancing the metabolic stability of galanin analogs to protect against seizures. More recently, we designed peripherally acting galanin analogs that reduce pain-related behaviors by acting in the periphery and exhibit preferential binding toward galanin receptor (GalR)2 over GalR1. In this study, we report preclinical studies of a monodisperse oligoethylene glycol-containing galanin analog, NAX 409-9 (previously reported as GalR2-dPEG24), in rodent analgesic and safety models. Results obtained with NAX 409-9 in these tests were compared with the representative analgesics gabapentin, ibuprofen, acetylsalicylic acid, acetaminophen, and morphine. In mice that received intraplantar carrageenan, NAX 409-9 increased paw withdrawal latency with an ED50 of 6.6 mg/kg i.p. NAX 409-9 also increased the paw withdrawal threshold to mechanical stimulation following partial sciatic nerve ligation in rats (2 mg/kg). Conversely, NAX 409-9 had no effect in the tail flick or hot plate assays (up to 24 mg/kg). Importantly, NAX 409-9 did not negatively affect gastrointestinal motility (4-20 mg/kg), respiratory rate (40-80 mg/kg), or bleed time (20 mg/kg). These studies illustrate that this nonbrain-penetrating galanin analog reduces pain behaviors in several models and does not produce some of the dose-limiting toxicities associated with other analgesics.

Comparative assessment of effectiveness of ketoprofen and ketoprofen/beta-cyclodextrin complex in two experimental models of inflammation in rats

Oral administration of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can lead to adverse effects such as gastrointestinal distress. The complexation of different groups of active substances with β-cyclodextrin (β-CD) has drawn considerable interest over recent years. The purpose of this study was to analyze the ketoprofen/β-cyclodextrin (K/β-CD) conjugate complex as well as to assess its anti-inflammatory effect after oral administration (doses of 30 mg/m(2) and 15 mg/m(2) of body surface), compared with ketoprofen. The studies were done on two models of experimentally-induced acute inflammation in rats (n = 48, 6/group), by means of intraplantar administration of a 10% aqueous kaolin suspension and intraperitoneal administration of a 1% sodium thioglycolate solution. The dynamics of the acute inflammatory process and the anti-inflammatory effects were monitored using plethysmometric determinations after 3, 6, 9, 12, 24 and 48 h (plantar inflammation), and the absorbance of the exudates (spectrophotometrically read) and nucleated cell counts after 24 h (peritoneal inflammation). The coupling of ketoprofen with β-CD resulted in increased solubility (100% in 60 min) of the newly-formed product, which further resulted in a higher bioavailability compared with ketoprofen (<40% in 120 min). In both models of experimentally-induced inflammation, the K/β-CD complex had a higher anti-inflammatory activity than ketoprofen.

Synthesis of NO–NSAID Dendritic Prodrugs via Passerini Reaction: New Approach to the Design of Dendrimer-drug Conjugates

We report the synthesis of a novel class of dendritic prodrugs via Passerini reaction in one pot. Such dendrimers feature a simultaneous attachment of a conventional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) (such as ibuprofen and aspirin) and a nitric oxide (NO)-releasing moiety (such as an organic nitrate) onto their surface, and are therefore regarded as new drug delivery systems for NO-releasing NSAIDs (NO–NSAIDs).

Anti-nociceptive and anti-inflammatory activities of (-)-α-bisabolol in rodents

(-)-α-Bisabolol is an unsaturated, optically active sesquiterpene alcohol obtained by the direct distillation of essential oil from plants such as Vanillosmopsis erythropappa and Matricaria chamomilla. (-)-α-Bisabolol has generated considerable economic interest, as it possesses a delicate floral odour and has been shown to have antiseptic and gastroprotective activities. In this study, (-)-α-bisabolol was tested in standardised rodent models by gavage administration at doses of 100 and 200 mg/kg in the models of inflammation and 25 and 50 mg/kg in the models of nociception. In the inflammatory models of paw oedema induced by carrageenan and dextran, the mice treated with (-)-α-bisabolol showed smaller oedemas compared to animals treated only with the vehicle. (-)-α-Bisabolol was capable of reducing paw oedemas induced by 5-HT but not oedemas induced by histamine. (-)-α-Bisabolol demonstrated anti-nociceptive activity in the models of visceral nociception induced by acetic acid and in the second phase of the nociception test induced by the intraplantar administration of formalin. (-)-α-Bisabolol did not have any effect in a thermal nociception model using a hot plate but was able to diminish mechanical inflammatory hypernociception evoked by carrageenan. These findings suggest that the anti-nociceptive action of (-)-α-bisabolol is not linked to a central mechanism but instead is related to the inflammatory process. (-)-α-Bisabolol was able to decrease leukocyte migration, protein extravasations and the amount of TNF-α to the peritoneal cavity in response to carrageenan. Additionally, (-)-α-bisabolol reduced neutrophil degranulation in response to phorbol-myristate-acetate. We demonstrate, for the first time, the peripheral anti-inflammatory and anti-nociceptive activities of (-)-α-bisabolol.

Concomitant use of SSRIs, NSAIDs/aspirin and gastroprotective drugs among residents of long-term care facilities: a medical record review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Concomitant use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) [including aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid)] may potentiate the likelihood of upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage (UGIH). The objectives of this study were to determine the prevalence and factors associated with concomitant SSRI/NSAID use among residents of long-term care facilities, and to investigate the use of gastroprotective drugs among concomitant SSRI/NSAID users.

METHODS

The study sample comprised 1087 out of 1444 residents of all 53 long-term care wards in Helsinki, Finland, in September 2003. Data were extracted from residents' medication charts and medical records by trained nurses. Medication, diagnostic and mortality data were available for 1004 residents.

RESULTS

Among the 1004 residents (mean ± SD age 81.3 ± 10.9 years), 28% used an SSRI, 38% used an NSAID and 24% used a gastroprotective drug. Thirteen percent of residents were concomitant users of SSRIs/NSAIDs. Concomitant use was associated with diabetes mellitus (p < 0.001), previous stroke (p < 0.001) and a higher degree of co-morbidity (p < 0.001). Gastroprotective drugs were used by 27% of concomitant users of SSRIs/NSAIDs compared with 37%, 20% and 22% of SSRI users, NSAID users and non-users of SSRIs/NSAIDs, respectively. One-year all-cause mortality was similar among all groups.

CONCLUSION

The long-term facility residents in this study sample were frequently exposed to drug-drug interactions that potentiate the risk of UGIH. Only about one-quarter of concomitant users of SSRIs/NSAIDs were prescribed a gastroprotective drug. Further initiatives are needed to optimize the use of SSRIs, NSAIDs and gastroprotective drugs.

The appropriate use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in rheumatic disease: opinions of a multidisciplinary European expert panel

INTRODUCTION

Given the safety issues of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) and the robustness of guidelines, making treatment choices in daily clinical practice is increasingly difficult. This study aimed systematically to analyse the opinions of a multidisciplinary European expert panel on the appropriateness of different NSAID, with or without the use of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), in individual patients with chronic rheumatic disease.

METHODS

/Using the Research and Development/University of California at Los Angeles appropriateness method, the appropriateness of five (non-)selective NSAID with or without a PPI was assessed for 144 hypothetical patient profiles, ie, unique combinations of cardiovascular and gastrointestinal risk factors. Appropriateness statements were calculated for all indications.

RESULTS

All options without PPI were considered appropriate in patients with no gastrointestinal/cardiovascular risk factors. Cyclooxygenase-2 selective inhibitors (C2SI) alone and non-selective NSAID plus PPI were preferred for patients with elevated gastrointestinal risk and low cardiovascular risk. Naproxen plus PPI was favoured in patients with high cardiovascular risk. For the combination of high gastrointestinal/high cardiovascular risk the use of any NSAID was discouraged; if needed, naproxen plus PPI or a C2SI plus PPI could be considered.

DISCUSSION

The panel results may support treatment considerations at the level of individual patients, according to their gastrointestinal/cardiovascular risk profile.

Identification of NSAID users at risk for gastrointestinal complications: a systematic review of current guidelines and consensus agreements

NSAIDs are among the most often used drugs worldwide. Numerous NSAID users are at risk for developing gastrointestinal complications. The purpose of this review was to identify and stratify risk factors for gastrointestinal complications in NSAID users documented in guidelines and consensus agreements, and to collect recommendations regarding over-the-counter (OTC) NSAID use. To facilitate this, a PubMed search from 1 January 1999 until 1 March 2009 was performed, resulting in the inclusion of nine English-language guidelines in our analysis. Risk factors were defined as 'definite' if mentioned in all guidelines; otherwise they were defined as 'controversial' risk factors. 'Definite' risk factors were a history of (complicated) peptic ulcer disease, older age (cut-off range 60-75 years), concomitant anticoagulant or corticosteroid use and multiple NSAID use, including low-dose aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid). 'Controversial' risk factors were high-dose NSAID use, concomitant clopidogrel or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor use, a history of gastrointestinal symptoms, rheumatoid arthritis disability and cardiovascular disease. Infection with Helicobacter pylori was identified as an additive risk factor. Risk factors in OTC NSAID users were difficult to identify in the current literature. Risk factors were not all uniformly present in analysed guidelines and consensus agreements. We identified a history of (complicated) peptic ulcer disease, older age, concomitant anticoagulant or corticosteroid use and multiple NSAID use, including low-dose aspirin, as definite gastrointestinal risk factors in NSAID users.

Reactive oxygen species-quenching and anti-apoptotic effect of polaprezinc on indomethacin-induced small intestinal epithelial cell injury

BACKGROUND

To protect the small intestine from mucosal injury induced by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is one of the critical issues in the field of gastroenterology. Polaprezinc (PZ), a gastric muco-protecting agent, has been widely used for the treatment of gastric ulcer and gastritis for its unique effects, such as its strong reactive oxygen species (ROS)-quenching effect. The aim of this study was to clarify the mechanism by which indomethacin-induced small intestinal mucosal injury occurs, by using a rat intestinal epithelial cell line (RIE-1). In addition, the protective role of PZ and the possible mechanism of its effect on indomethacin-induced small intestinal injury were investigated.

METHODS

Cell death was evaluated by methyl thiazolyl tetrazolium (MTT) assay and a double-staining method with Hoechst33342 dye and propidium iodide. Indomethacin-induced ROS production was evaluated by detecting the oxidation of a redox-sensitive fluorogenic probe, RedoxSensor, and the oxidation of cysteine residues of proteins (protein S oxidation). The activation of cytochrome c, smac/DIABLO, and caspase-3 was assessed by western blotting. In some experiments, PZ or its components, L: -carnosine and zinc, were used.

RESULTS

We found that indomethacin caused apoptosis in RIE-1 cells in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Indomethacin also induced ROS production and an increase in the protein S oxidation of RIE-1. Pretreatment of RIE-1 with PZ or zinc sulfate, but not L: -carnosine, significantly reduced the indomethacin-induced apoptosis. PZ prevented ROS production and the increase in protein S-oxidation. PZ inhibited indomethacin-induced cytochrome c and smac/DIABLO release and subsequent caspase-3 activation.

CONCLUSIONS

The protective effect of PZ on indomethacin-induced small intestinal injury may be dependent on its ROS-quenching effect.

ISFM and AAFP consensus guidelines: long-term use of NSAIDs in cats

NSAIDS AND CATS: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are an important class of drug in feline medicine, having analgesic, anti-inflammatory and antipyretic activity. While most published data on their use in this species relate to short-term (often perioperative) therapy, there is increasing evidence of the value of these drugs in treating chronic pain in cats (for example, that associated with degenerative joint disease), and some NSAIDs have now become licensed for long-term use in cats in some geographies. Most of our knowledge of therapeutic mechanisms or adverse drug reactions associated with NSAIDs is extrapolated from work in other species, and there is a paucity of published data relating to cats.

GUIDELINES

These guidelines have been drawn together by an expert panel, which have reviewed the current literature on long-term NSAID use in cats and other species, and developed guidance on their use based on this information. The aim is to provide practical information for veterinarians to encourage appropriate NSAID therapy whenever cats will benefit from the use of these drugs.

The risk of gastric cancer in patients with duodenal and gastric ulcer: research progresses and clinical implications

INTRODUCTION

Although controversial, clinicians generally consider patients who present with gastric ulcer to have an increased risk of gastric cancer, while the risk for patients with duodenal ulcer is reduced in comparison with that of the general population. Infection with Helicobacter pylori and the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the major causes for peptic ulcers, but their roles in relation to the risk of gastric cancer in patients with peptic ulcer may be different.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This article reviewed existing literature to assess our understanding of the risk of gastric cancer in patients with gastric and duodenal ulcers more than 25 years after the discovery of H. pylori and also examined whether gastric ulcers induced by NSAID carry a lower risk of gastric cancer as compared to those induced by H. pylori infection or other causes.

Clinical trial: healing of NSAID-associated gastric ulcers in patients continuing NSAID therapy - a randomized study comparing ranitidine with esomeprazole

BACKGROUND

The use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) is associated with an increased risk of gastric ulcer (GU) development.

METHODS

This multicentre, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial compared endoscopic healing rates at 4 and 8 weeks after treatment with oral esomeprazole 40 or 20 mg once daily, or ranitidine 150 mg twice daily, in patients with 1 baseline GU > or = 5 mm but no GUs or duodenal ulcers >25 mm in diameter who received continued cyclooxygenase-2-selective or non-selective NSAID therapies. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients in each treatment group who had no GUs at week 8.

RESULTS

Four hundred and forty patients were randomized to treatment. At week 8, GU healing rates (95% CI) with esomeprazole 40 mg, esomeprazole 20 mg and ranitidine were 85.7 (79.8-91.7)%, 84.8 (78.8-90.8)% and 76.3 (69.2-83.3)%, respectively; between-group differences were not statistically significant. Week-4 GU healing rates were 70.7 (62.9-78.4)% and 72.5 (65.0-79.9)% with esomeprazole 40 and 20 mg, respectively, and were significantly higher (P < 0.01 for both doses) than those with ranitidine [55.4 (47.1-63.7)%].

CONCLUSION

In patients who require continued NSAID therapy, GU healing rates at 8 weeks numerically favoured esomeprazole but were not significantly different from ranitidine.

Drug-induced injury in the gastrointestinal tract: clinical and pathologic considerations

Drug toxicity in the gastrointestinal tract is a common and serious medical problem; the number of drugs that can harm the gastrointestinal tract is impressive. The morbidity, mortality, and medical costs associated with drug toxicity, even when restricted to the gastrointestinal tract, are probably underestimated. Drug-induced gastrointestinal tract pathology is very diverse and can mimic many non-drug-related conditions. Drug toxicity, whether direct or indirect, can be restricted to a segment of the gastrointestinal tract or affect the entire gastrointestinal tract. The consequences of drug toxicity are also quite variable and can range from unimportant pathology (e.g. the relatively common and usually benign drug-induced diarrhea) at one end of the spectrum, to fatal gastrointestinal tract hemorrhage or perforation at the other end of the spectrum. Better awareness of the possibility of drug-induced gastrointestinal tract pathology, by both gastroenterologists and pathologists, and better communication between gastroenterologists, pathologists and other specialists will improve the recognition of drug-induced gastrointestinal tract pathology, and, ultimately, improve patient care. This Review focuses on the most common and well-described drug-related clinicopathologic conditions of the gastrointestinal tract. Much discussion is, therefore, dedicated to NSAIDs--the most commonly prescribed drugs and consequently the drugs most commonly associated with gastrointestinal tract toxicity.

Mechanisms underlying the anti-inflammatory activity and gastric safety of acemetacin

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Acemetacin is regarded as a pro-drug of indomethacin and induces significantly less gastric damage but the reasons for this greater gastric safety of acemetacin are unclear. The anti-inflammatory effects of acemetacin have been attributed, at least in part, to its hepatic biotransformation to indomethacin. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of acemetacin and indomethacin in an in vivo model of acute inflammation and to examine the importance of biotransformation of acemetacin (to indomethacin) to its anti-inflammatory actions.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

The zymosan airpouch model was used in rats. Indomethacin or acemetacin (2.7-83.8 micromol kg(-1)) were administered orally or directly into the pouch. Leukocyte infiltration, prostaglandin (PG) E(2) and leukotriene (LT) B(4) levels in exudates, and whole blood thromboxane (TX) B(2) synthesis were measured.

KEY RESULTS

Acemetacin was rapidly converted to indomethacin after its administration. Both acemetacin and indomethacin elicited comparable, dose-dependent reductions of leukocyte infiltration and of PGE(2) and TXB(2) synthesis. However, indomethacin induced more gastric damage than acemetacin and elevated LTB(4) production in the airpouch.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

The similar effects of acemetacin and indomethacin on leukocyte infiltration and PG synthesis are consistent with rapid biotransformation of acemetacin to indomethacin. Some of this biotransformation may occur extra-hepatically, for instance in inflammatory exudates. Acemetacin probably exerts actions independent of conversion to indomethacin, given the different effects of these two drugs on LTB(4) production. Such differences may contribute to the relative gastric safety of acemetacin compared to indomethacin.

Retrospective Evaluation of Adverse??Drug Reactions Induced??by??Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are among the most widely prescribed drugs, and their use can be complicated by the development of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The aim of this study was to assess the frequency of NSAID-induced ADRs in hospitalised patients in the Clinical Divisions of the Catanzaro and Cosenza hospitals.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed NSAID-induced ADRs after evaluating all ADRs recorded by the Clinical Divisions of the Catanzaro and Cosenza hospitals over a 10-year period, from January 1995 to December 2004.

RESULTS

NSAIDs were found to be responsible for 55.2% of the episodes of ADRs overall. Diclofenac and aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) were the drugs most frequently involved in the development of ADRs, while the skin was the body system most susceptible to NSAID-induced ADRs (43%). We determined that the drug-ADR relationship was probable in 62% of the reports; withdrawal of NSAID therapy led to a resolution of the clinical features of ADRs in 86% of episodes.

CONCLUSION

NSAID therapy represents a common cause of ADRs in hospitalised patients. Their use should be carefully considered, especially in the presence of polydrug therapy.

Use of gastroprotective agents in recommended doses in hospitalized patients receiving NSAIDs: a drug utilization study

OBJECTIVE

In recent years, studies investigated to what extend recommendations for co-prescribing gastroprotective agents in prevention of NSAID-induced gastrointestinal complications are followed in clinical practice. However, only a few studies have also taken into consideration the recommended dose of gastroprotectives prescribed in NSAID-induced ulcer prophylaxis. The aim of our study was to evaluate the prevalence of concomitant use of gastroprotectives with NSAIDs in hospitalized patients, with emphasis on the recommended dose of gastroprotectives for ulcer prophylaxis.

METHOD

This observational, cross-sectional, drug utilization study included all adult patients receiving NSAIDs hospitalized in the Clinical Hospital Center Zagreb on the day of the study. Data on age, sex, comorbidities, indications for NSAID use, type/dose of NSAIDs and gastroprotectives, history of gastrointestinal events, active gastrointestinal symptoms and risk factors were evaluated.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Study outcomes were: (1) prevalence of prescription of gastroprotectives among NSAID-users at risk; (2) prevalence of prescription of gastroprotective in recommended dose; (3) association between risk factors and prescription of GPAs.

RESULTS

The rates of gastroprotectives prescription were significantly higher in NSAID-users with concomitant risk factors as compared to patients without risk factors [47/70 (67.1%) and 8/22 (36.4%), respectively; p=0.01072]. However, gastroprotection in recommended ulcer-preventive dose was low in both groups [8/70 (11.4%) and 9/92 (9.8%), respectively]. The number of concomitant risk factors did not increase the odds of receiving anti-ulcer therapy (odds ratio 0.7279). Thirty-three percent of patients with concomitant risk factors were not prescribed gastroprotectives. Ibuprofen, NSAID with the lowest risk of inducing gastrointestinal complications, was prescribed in only two patients.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate high awareness among hospital physicians about possible NSAID-induced gastrointestinal complications, but insufficient knowledge about risk factors related to NSAID-induced gastrointestinal toxicity, recommended dose of gastroprotectives in NSAID-induced ulcer prophylaxis and gastrointestinal toxicity of different types of NSAIDs.

Effects of cyclooxygenase inhibition on the gastrointestinal tract

Cyclooxygenase (COX) is a rate-limiting enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of arachidonic acid, an essential fatty acid present in cell membrane phospholipids and liberated by phospholipase, into prostaglandins (PGs) and prostanoids. COX has two distinct membrane-anchored isoenzymes; COX-1 and COX-2. COX-1 is a constitutively expressed and found in most normal body tissues; COX-2 is expressed in normal tissues at low levels and is highly induced by pro-inflammatory mediators in the setting of inflammation, injury, and pain. Inhibitors of COX activity include: (1) conventional non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (ns-NSAIDs); (2) selective COX-2 inhibitors (COXIBs); and (3) COX-1 inhibitors. Non-selective NSAIDs, at therapeutic doses, inhibit both COX-1 and COX-2. The anti-inflammatory benefits of these drugs are primarily derived from COX-2 inhibition, while inhibition of COX-1 often elicits gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. Therefore, COXIBs were developed to provide a selective COX-2 agent, i.e., one, that at fully therapeutic doses demonstrated comparable therapeutic benefit to non-selective NSAIDs, without the attendant COX-1-mediated GI toxicities. In this review, we evaluate available literature describing the pathophysiologic role of cyclooxygenases and the effects of their inhibition in GI system in experimental and domestic animal species.

Differential diagnosis of reactive gastropathy

Reactive or chemical gastropathy is the constellation of endoscopic and histological changes caused by chemical injury to the gastric mucosa. Its diagnosis rests on the histopathological demonstration of nonspecific elementary lesions that may occur simultaneously or separately in different degrees and various proportions. These lesions include foveolar hyperplasia, interfoveolar smooth muscle fibers, erosions, edema, and hyperemia, in the absence of significant inflammation. Their respective occurrence in a set of gastric biopsies can be placed on a spectrum of diagnostic certainty that is never absolute because each of such changes can and does occur in other conditions. Although a correlation between histological evidence of chemical gastropathy and clinical manifestations, particularly risk of bleeding, is yet to be documented, reporting the suspicion of drug-induced gastric damage may help clinicians to identify patients that might benefit from change, reduction, or discontinuation of certain medications.

Prevention of NSAID-associated gastrointestinal lesions: a comparison study pantoprazole versus omeprazole

AIM

To investigate tolerability and efficacy of pantoprazole 20 mg, once daily (o.d.), pantoprazole 40 mg o.d., and omeprazole 20 mg o.d., in patients taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug(s) (NSAIDs).

METHODS

Included in this randomized, double-blind, multicenter, parallel-group study were rheumatic patients (>55 yr) on continual NSAIDs and with at least one more recognized risk factor that contributes to the development of gastrointestinal (GI) injury. Study duration was 6 months, and the treatment consisted of pantoprazole 20 mg o.d. (N = 196), pantoprazole 40 mg o.d. (N = 199), or omeprazole 20 mg o.d. (N = 200). Patients took NSAID(s) (except COX-2 inhibitors), had no more than five erosions/petechiae in the upper GI tract, no current peptic ulcers or reflux esophagitis, and had at most moderate intensity GI symptoms. Endoscopy was performed at baseline, 3, and 6 months. The primary end points were lack of "therapeutic failure" and lack of "endoscopic failure" at 6 months.

RESULTS

After 6 months, the probabilities to remain in remission were 90% pantoprazole 20 mg o.d., 93% pantoprazole 40 mg o.d., and 89% omeprazole 20 mg o.d. for lack of "therapeutic failure;" 91% pantoprazole 20 mg o.d., 95% pantoprazole 40 mg o.d., and 93% omeprazole 20 mg o.d. for lack of "endoscopic failure."

CONCLUSIONS

For patients taking NSAIDs continually, pantoprazole 20 mg o.d., pantoprazole 40 mg o.d., or omeprazole 20 mg o.d. provide equivalent, effective, and well-tolerated prophylaxis against GI lesions, including peptic ulcers.

Polymorphisms in genes encoding acetylsalicylic acid metabolizing enzymes are unrelated to upper gastrointestinal health in cardiovascular patients on acetylsalicylic acid

BACKGROUND

As acetylsalicylic acid is metabolized by UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A6 (UGT1A6) and cytochrome P450 2C9 (CYP2C9), interindividual differences in activity of these enzymes may modulate the effects and side-effects of acetylsalicylic acid. The objective of this study was to assess whether polymorphisms in UGT1A6 and CYP2C9 genes are related to the prevalence of upper gastrointestinal symptoms in cardiovascular patients using acetylsalicylic acid for secondary prevention of ischaemic heart disease.

METHODS

Blood samples were taken from acetylsalicylic acid using patients admitted to the Coronary Care Unit. Dyspepsia-related health was evaluated at week 2, using a validated upper gastrointestinal complaint questionnaire. A subset of 160 patients responded to a survey and were eligible to participate in this study. DNA was isolated and UGT1A6 and CYP2C9 genotypes were determined using polymerase chain reaction restricted fragment length polymorphism techniques.

RESULTS

Seventy per cent of the patients returned the questionnaire. UGT1A6 and CYP2C9 variant polymorphisms were found in 103 (63%) and 56 (35%) patients, respectively. There was no association between gastrointestinal symptoms and UGT1A6 (OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.41-1.56) or CYP2C9 polymorphisms (OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.44-1.67).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no association between polymorphisms in genes encoding for acetylsalicylic acid metabolizing enzymes on the prevalence of gastric complaints in cardiovascular patients on acetylsalicylic acid.

Increase in Nonfatal Digestive Perforations and Haemorrhages Following Introduction of Selective NSAIDs

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

This article documents the impact of the introduction of selective NSAIDs on overall prescription patterns of NSAIDs and associated gastroprotective agents (GPAs), and on the rate of nonfatal digestive perforations and haemorrhages.

METHODS

A retrospective, closed cohort study was conducted using the Quebec Health Insurance Board databases, for a 3-year period overlapping the introduction of selective NSAIDs. All adult subjects who were continuously registered with the Public Prescription Drug Program (PPDP) between 1 January 1999 and 31 December 2001 (n = 2 052 231) were included. Prescriptions for NSAIDs (selective [celecoxib, rofecoxib and meloxicam] and nonselective), concomitant use of GPAs and nonfatal digestive perforations or haemorrhages diagnosed in hospital were compiled. Data were analysed on an annual basis according to age, sex and patient risk of gastrointestinal (GI) complications.

RESULTS

The listing of selective NSAIDs in the PPDP formulary was followed by a 28.2% increase in the prevalence of NSAID use from 19.5% in 1999 to 25% in 2001. The proportion of long-term users also evolved rapidly with a 135% increase over 3 years. From 1999 to 2001, there was a 75.9% increase in the rate of nonfatal digestive perforations and haemorrhages in the presence of NSAIDs.

CONCLUSION

The introduction of selective NSAIDs stimulated NSAID use and coincided with an increased incidence of nonfatal digestive perforations and haemorrhages in the presence of NSAIDs. Selective NSAIDs should be prescribed with caution to persons at risk for GI complications.

Healing of gastric ulcers with esomeprazole versus ranitidine in patients who continued to receive NSAID therapy: a randomized trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare orally administered esomeprazole 40 mg once daily and 20 mg once daily with ranitidine 150 mg twice daily for the healing of gastric ulcers (GUs) during 8 wks in patients who continued to receive daily nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) therapy.

METHODS

This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial included patients who were receiving nonselective or cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2)-selective NSAIDs and had at least one GU >or=5 mm but no gastric or duodenal ulcer >25 mm in diameter at the baseline esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). After 4 and 8 wks of treatment, ulcer-healing status was confirmed by EGD. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients in each treatment group who had no GUs (GU healing rate) at week 8.

RESULTS

A total of 406 patients were randomized to treatment. At week 8, GU healing rates with esomeprazole 40 and 20 mg were 91.5% (118/129; 95% CI, 86.7-96.3%) and 88.4% (122/138; 95% CI, 83.1-93.7%), respectively, and were significantly higher than the 74.2% rate (98/132; 95% CI, 66.8-81.7%) with ranitidine (p<0.01 for both comparisons). GU healing rates at 4 wks (78.3%[101/129] and 79.0%[109/138] in the esomeprazole 40- and 20-mg groups, respectively) were also significantly higher (p<0.05) than in the ranitidine group (66.7%[88/132]). All treatments were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Esomeprazole 40 and 20 mg once daily are effective and well-tolerated therapies compared with ranitidine 150 mg twice daily for healing GUs in patients who need to continue NSAID therapy.

Basic pharmacology and advances in emergency medicine

To provide optimal pain control for their patients, emergency physicians should have an in-depth understanding of analgesic drugs and how to use and combine them effectively. The purpose of this article is to describe the pharmacology and use of analgesic agents that are most useful in the management of acute pain in the emergency department.

Inadequate Use of Preventive Strategies in Patients Receiving NSAIDs

OBJECTIVE

Little is known about the factors that influence the decision to use NSAIDs in combination with gastroprotective drugs. The aims of this observational study were to evaluate the extent to which NSAID users are prescribed concomitant gastroprotective drug regimens ('preventive strategies'), and to determine how patient risk factors for NSAID-associated gastrointestinal toxicity and physician prescribing preferences influenced the decision to prescribe a gastroprotective drug in combination with an NSAID.

DESIGN AND PATIENTS

The study was conducted on 29 June 2004 and comprised 109 eligible adult patients hospitalised at the Clinical Hospital Center, Zagreb. Use of NSAIDs and gastroprotective drugs, risk factors for NSAID-associated gastrointestinal toxicity, and physician prescribing preferences were monitored throughout the study.

RESULTS

Sixty-six percent of patients receiving proton pump inhibitors or histamine H(2)-receptor antagonists with NSAIDs had no risk factors for gastrointestinal toxicity. Furthermore, 29% of patients who used NSAIDs had risk factors for gastrointestinal toxicity but were not receiving gastroprotective drugs. Even though patients at risk of NSAID-associated gastrointestinal complications had higher odds of receiving preventive strategies (odds ratio 1.25), the absolute rate of utilisation of these therapies in at-risk populations was unacceptably low (69%). However, the strongest independent correlation for gastroprotective drug use was the prescribing physician, with an odds ratio of 6.40.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that an individual physician's prescribing style largely determines the odds of receiving preventive strategies with NSAID treatment and is more important than the patient's risk factors for gastrointestinal toxicity.

Efficacy and tolerability of pantoprazole compared with misoprostol for the prevention of NSAID-related gastrointestinal lesions and symptoms in rheumatic patients

AIM

To compare the efficacy and tolerability of pantoprazole 20 mg once daily (o.d.) with misoprostol 200 microg twice daily (b.i.d.), administered for 6 months to rheumatic patients who required long-term therapy with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and who were at increased risk of developing gastrointestinal lesions.

METHODS

This randomized, double-blind, multicenter, parallel group comparison study was performed with rheumatic patients (n = 515) who were likely to take NSAIDs continuously for at least 6 months. Patients were 55 years or older, at risk to develop gastrointestinal lesions, had less than five erosions/petechiae in the stomach and duodenum, no ulcers, no reflux esophagitis (endoscopy-proven), and gastrointestinal symptoms of at most moderate intensity. A minimum daily dose was defined for NSAIDs (COX-2 inhibitors were not available at the time). Patients were randomized to take either pantoprazole 20 mg o.d. (n = 257) or misoprostol 200 microg b.i.d. (n = 258) for 6 months while continuing NSAID therapy. Endoscopy was performed at baseline, 3, and 6 months.

RESULTS

Pantoprazole was superior to misoprostol (p < 0.001) with regard to 'therapeutic failure' (occurrence of a peptic ulcer, ten or more erosions/petechiae in the stomach/duodenum, reflux esophagitis, severe gastrointestinal symptoms, and/or 'likely' or 'definitely' related adverse event leading to study termination). Estimated remission rates at 3 and 6 months (Kaplan-Meier life-table analysis) were, respectively, 93 and 89% (pantoprazole) and 79 and 70% (misoprostol). Pantoprazole was superior to misoprostol (p = 0.005) with regard to 'endoscopic failure' (occurrence of a peptic ulcer, ten or more erosions/petechiae in the stomach/duodenum, or reflux esophagitis) after 6 months. Estimated remission rates at 3 and 6 months were, respectively, 98 and 95% (pantoprazole) and 95 and 86% (misoprostol). Patients discontinuing the study early due to adverse events 'likely' or 'definitely' related to the study drug accounted for 13/257 (5%) in the pantoprazole and 33/258 (13%) in the misoprostol treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

Pantoprazole 20 mg o.d. is superior to misoprostol 200 microg b.i.d. in the prevention of NSAID-induced gastrointestinal lesions and symptoms in patients on continuous long-term treatment with NSAIDs due to rheumatic diseases and at risk to develop such lesions or symptoms.

Association between concomitant use of several systemic NSAIDs and an excess risk of adverse drug reaction. A case/non-case study from the French Pharmacovigilance system database

AIMS

To examine whether the risk of some selected adverse effects increases with the number of systemic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID) drugs.

METHODS

The French Pharmacovigilance database was examined for an association between drug reaction reports and the exposure to one and two or more NSAIDs using a case/non-case study design. In the analysis, 54,583 spontaneous reports of adverse drug reactions were included, consisting of 2270 reports of hepatic injury, 994 reports of acute renal failure, 194 reports of gastrointestinal bleeding and 525 reports of angioedema, among others.

RESULTS

Use of NSAIDs significantly increased the risk of hepatic injury, gastrointestinal bleeding, acute renal failure and angioedema. The odds ratios tended to increase with the number of NSAIDs for hepatic injury, gastrointestinal bleeding and acute renal failure but not for angioedema. In comparison with reports that did not mention any use of NSAIDs, the odds ratios associated with the use of a single NSAID and two or more NSAIDs were respectively 1.2 (95%CI: 0.9-1.5) and 2.2 (95%CI: 1.3-3.8) for hepatic injury, 7.3 (95%CI: 4.9-10.9) and 10.7 (95%CI: 2.9-40.2) for gastrointestinal bleeding, 3.2 (95%CI: 2.5-4.1) and 4.8 (95%CI: 2.6-8.8) for acute renal failure. For angioedema, the odds ratios were roughly similar when a single NSAID (OR=2.7; 95% CI: 2.2-3.4) or two or more NSAIDs (OR=2.0; 95%CI: 0.7-6.0) were used. The risk of severe ADRs (hepatic injury and acute renal failure) was six- to sevenfold higher in reports mentioning concomitant use of two NSAIDs or more than in those that did not.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that concomitant use of two or more NSAIDs was associated with an excess risk of adverse effects such as hepatic injury, acute renal failure and gastrointestinal bleeding. Although simultaneous use of several systemic NSAIDs has no pharmacological justification, this may raise a serious public health problem with the increasing use of over-the-counter non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents.

Melatonin protects against piroxicam-induced gastric ulceration

The antiulcer effect of melatonin on gastric lesions caused by piroxicam was studied with the intent of determining the mechanism of action of this agent. Melatonin dose-dependently lowered piroxicam and indomethacin-induced gastric damage with more than 90% inhibition at a dose of 60 mg/kg BW. Increased lipid peroxidation, augmented protein oxidation and decreased glutathione content of the gastric tissue following piroxicam treatment indicated a possible involvement of oxidative stress in this nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-induced gastropathy. Pretreatment of rats with melatonin prevented these changes. Oral administration of piroxicam to rats caused a threefold increase in the tissue levels of hydroxyl radical generation, a change significantly attenuated by melatonin. Furthermore, a decrease in the activity of gastric peroxidase and an increase in the activity of gastric superoxide dismutase(s) (SOD) because of piroxicam treatment was attenuated by melatonin pretreatment indicating that the indole possibly exerts its gastroprotective effects through its direct as well as indirect antioxidant activities. The results of the present studies also reveal that melatonin may influence the expression of Cu-Zn SOD, catalase, cyclooxygenase as well as alpha-actinin whose levels were found to be altered, following piroxicam treatment. The current studies, therefore, document melatonin's gastroprotective ability against piroxicam-induced gastric damage and the findings raise the possibility of melatonin being considered as a co-therapy with piroxicam or other NSAIDs in reducing the gastropathy when long-term use of these nonsteroidal agents are unavoidable.

The cox-2-specific inhibitor celecoxib inhibits adenylyl cyclase

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are well-known causes of acute renal insufficiency and gastropathy in patients with chronic inflammatory diseases. This action is presumed to result from nonselective inhibition of both constitutive and inducible forms of prostaglandin H synthases, also known as the cyclooxygenase enzymes (i.e., COX-1 amd COX-2). Celecoxib (Celebrex) is a COX-2 enzyme inhibitor and has emerged as a preferred therapeutic agent for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis as compared to other NSAIDs. Celecoxib has recently been the subject of criticism for its side effects, mainly arterial thrombosis and renal hemorrhage, although it is considered a superior drug in protecting the gastrointestinal tract. In the present study, we report that celecoxib not only inhibited COX-2, but also exhibited the property of inhibiting adenylyl cyclase, an important enzyme forming the intracellular second messenger 3',5'-adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) from adenosine triphosphate (ATP). Celecoxib also inhibited cholera toxin-stimulated cAMP formation, which indicated its ability to permeate cell membranes in order to reach intracellular adenylyl cyclase. It inhibited in vitro adenylyl cyclase activity in both human colonic epithelial cells and purified adenylyl cyclase from Bordetella pertussis. The IC50 of celecoxib for B. pertussis adenylyl cyclase was calculated to be 0.375 mM. Lineweaver-Burk analysis showed that the type of enzyme inhibition was competitive. The apparent Km and Vm of adenylyl cyclase was calculated as 25.0 nM and 7.14 nmol/min/mg, respectively. Celecoxib changed the Km value to 66.6 nM without affecting the Vmax. The current study suggests that apart from inflammation, celecoxib therapy could be further extended to diseases involving cAMP upregulation either by endogenous reactions or exogenous agents. These new data showing inhibition of adenylyl cyclase should be considered in light of the drug's pathological effects or in patients specifically excluded from treatment (e.g., asthmatics).

Improving medication use in newly admitted home healthcare patients: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

To test the efficacy of a medication use improvement program developed specifically for home health agencies. The program addressed four medication problems identified by an expert panel: unnecessary therapeutic duplication, cardiovascular medication problems, use of psychotropic drugs in patients with possible adverse psychomotor or adrenergic effects, and use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in patients at high risk of peptic ulcer complications. It used a structured collaboration between a specially trained clinical pharmacist and the patients' home-care nurses to improve medication use.

DESIGN

Parallel-group, randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Two of the largest home health agencies in the United States.

PARTICIPANTS

Study subjects were consenting Medicare patients aged 65 and older admitted to participating agency offices from October 1996 through September 1998, with a projected home healthcare duration of at least 4 weeks and at least one study medication problem.

INTERVENTION

Qualifying patients were randomized to usual care or usual care with the medication improvement program.

MEASUREMENTS

Medication use was measured during an in-home interview, with container inspection at baseline and at follow-up (between 6 and 12 weeks) by interviewers unaware of treatment assignment. The trial endpoint was the proportion of patients with medication use improvement according to predefined criteria at follow-up.

RESULTS

There were 259 randomized patients with completed follow-up interviews: 130 in the intervention group and 129 with usual care. Medication use improved for 50% of intervention patients and 38% of control patients, an attributable improvement of 12 patients per 100 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.0-24.0, P =.051). The intervention effect was greatest for therapeutic duplication, with improvement for 71% of intervention and 24% of control patients, an attributable improvement of 47 patients per 100 (95% CI = 20-74, P =.003). Use of cardiovascular medications also improved more frequently in intervention patients: 55% vs 18%, attributable improvement 37 patients per 100 (95% CI = 9-66, P =.017). There were no significant improvements for the psychotropic medication or NSAID problems. There was no evidence of adverse intervention effects: new medication problems, more agency nurse visits, or increased duration of home health care.

CONCLUSIONS

A program congruent with existing personnel and practices of home health agencies improved medication use in a vulnerable population and was particularly effective in reducing therapeutic duplication.

Underutilization of gastroprotective measures in patients receiving nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs

OBJECTIVE

To determine the frequency of use of recommended gastroprotective strategies in a cohort of patients receiving recurrent treatment with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was performed using administrative data from the Tennessee Medicaid (TennCare) program. The study population consisted of 76,765 recurrent recipients of NSAIDs (NSAID users), comprising 24% of the 319,402 persons ages 50 years or older enrolled in the TennCare program from January 1999 through June 2000. Frequency of use of either of 2 recommended gastroprotective strategies, involving either traditional NSAIDs combined with recommended anti-ulcer cotherapy or use of a selective cyclooxygenase 2-inhibiting drug (coxib), was measured and categorized by risk for ulcer complication.

RESULTS

Among this cohort of recurrent NSAID users, 16% received 1 of the 2 recommended gastroprotective therapies: 10% received traditional NSAIDs along with antiulcer drugs at the recommended doses and 6% received coxibs. Among those patients with > or=2 risk factors for ulcer complications (age 75 years or older, peptic ulcer or gastrointestinal bleeding in the past year, or concurrent use of oral anticoagulants or corticosteroids), 30% received such gastroprotective therapy.

CONCLUSION

Use of recommended strategies to decrease ulcer complications in vulnerable populations is relatively uncommon.

Lansoprazole: an update of its place in the management of acid-related disorders

Lansoprazole is an inhibitor of gastric acid secretion and also exhibits antibacterial activity against Helicobacter pylori in vitro. Current therapy for peptic ulcer disease focuses on the eradication of H. pylori infection with maintenance therapy indicated in those patients who are not cured of H. pylori and those with ulcers resistant to healing. Lansoprazole 30 mg combined with amoxicillin 1g, clarithromycin 250 or 500mg, or metronidazole 400 mg twice daily was associated with eradication rates ranging from 71 to 94%, and ulcer healing rates were generally >80% in well designed studies. In addition, it was as effective as omeprazole- or rabeprazole-based regimens which included these antimicrobial agents. Maintenance therapy with lansoprazole 30 mg/day was significantly more effective than either placebo or ranitidine in preventing ulcer relapse. Importantly, preliminary data suggest that lansoprazole-based eradication therapy is effective in children and the elderly. In the short-term treatment of patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), lansoprazole 15, 30 or 60 mg/day was significantly more effective than placebo, ranitidine 300 mg/day or cisapride 40 mg/day and similar in efficacy to pantoprazole 40 mg/day in terms of healing of oesophagitis. Lansoprazole 30 mg/day, omeprazole 20 mg/day and pantoprazole 40 mg/day all provided similar symptom relief in these patients. In patients with healed oesophagitis. 12-month maintenance therapy with lansoprazole 15 or 30 mg/day prevented recurrence and was similar to or more effective than omeprazole 10 or 20 mg/day. Available data in patients with NSAID-related disorders or acid-related dyspepsia suggest that lansoprazole is effective in these patients in terms of the prevention of NSAID-related gastrointestinal complications, ulcer healing and symptom relief. Meta-analytic data and postmarketing surveillance in >30,000 patients indicate that lansoprazole is well tolerated both as monotherapy and in combination with antimicrobial agents. After lansoprazole monotherapy commonly reported adverse events included dose-dependent diarrhoea, nausea/vomiting, headache and abdominal pain. After short-term treatment in patients with peptic ulcer, GORD, dyspepsia and gastritis the incidence of adverse events associated with lansoprazole was generally < or = 5%. Similar adverse events were seen in long-term trials, although the incidence was generally higher (< or = 10%). When lansoprazole was administered in combination with amoxicillin, clarithromycin or metronidazole adverse events included diarrhoea, headache and taste disturbance. In conclusion, lansoprazole-based triple therapy is an effective treatment option for the eradication of H. pylori infection in patients with peptic ulcer disease. Preliminary data suggest it may have an important role in the management of this infection in children and the elderly. In the short-term management of GORD, lansoprazole monotherapy offers a more effective alternative to histamine H2-receptor antagonists and initial data indicate that it is an effective short-term treatment option in children and adolescents. In adults lansoprazole maintenance therapy is also an established treatment option for the long-term management of this chronic disease. Lansoprazole has a role in the treatment and prevention of NSAID-related ulcers and the treatment of acid-related dyspepsia; however, further studies are needed to confirm its place in these indications. Lansoprazole has emerged as a useful and well tolerated treatment option in the management of acid-related disorders.

Gastro-duodenal protection in an era of cyclo-oxygenase-2-selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are effective and necessary for the relief of pain and inflammation in patients with arthritis. NSAIDs are however also associated with an increased risk for ulceration in the stomach and in the duodenum, and many NSAID users experience bothersome dyspeptic symptoms during continued NSAID therapy. PPIs like omeprazole, have been shown to heal and to prevent ulcers and dyspeptic symptoms during continued NSAID therapy, and during continued NSAID therapy the prostaglandin analogue, misoprostol, has been shown to reduce the risk for ulcer complications. The COX-2 selective NSAID, rofecoxib, is in comparison with naproxen, a non-selective NSAID, associated with fewer clinically important upper gastrointestinal events. The incidence of myocardial infarctions seems, however, to be lower with naproxen than with rofecoxib, and this is expected to lead to low-dose aspirin use in rofecoxib users at risk for cardiovascular events. Co-administration of the COX-2 selective NSAID, celecoxib, and low-dose aspirin, is associated with the same risk for upper gastrointestinal ulcer complications alone and combined with symptomatic ulcers, as the non-selective NSAIDs, ibuprofen and diclofenac. A proton pump inhibitor (PPI) should be used for healing of NSAID-associated ulcers, and a PPI or misoprostol should be considered for prevention of ulceration in non-selective NSAID users at risk for ulceration. The experience with COX-2 selective NSAIDs is still limited, and it remains to be studied whether subpopulations of COX-2 selective NSAID users will benefit from gastro-duodenal protection.

An evidence-based approach to the gastrointestinal safety profile of COX-2-selective anti-inflammatories

Evidence-based medicine (EBM) provides frameworks for the systematic review of study methodology and results. Thus, EBM frameworks facilitate assessing a study's ability to produce unbiased and accurate results and applying the results to the management of individual patients. Using EBM frameworks, published literature about risk factors for serious NSAID-associated gastrointestinal (GI) disorders, GI safety of COX-2 selective NSAIDs, and GI safety of co-therapy of proton pump inhibitors and NSAIDs are reviewed. This article concludes with evidence-based recommendations concerning which patients are at high risk for serious NSAID-associated GI disorders and which therapies are most effective in reducing serious NSAID-associated GI disorders.

Helicobacter pylori infection as a risk factor for gastrointestinal symptoms in patients using aspirin to prevent ischaemic heart disease

BACKGROUND

Aspirin use in the secondary prevention of ischaemic heart disease may provoke gastrointestinal discomfort.

OBJECTIVE

To register gastrointestinal symptoms and complications in patients with cardiovascular disease using aspirin and to relate these symptoms to infection with H. pylori.

METHODS

Blood samples were obtained from 398 consecutive patients in the Coronary-Care Unit, University Hospital Nijmegen and analysed for serum antibody levels to H. pylori infection. Questionnaires were sent 2 weeks after discharge to assess gastrointestinal symptoms.

RESULTS

Questionnaires were returned by 314 patients (79%). A total of 183 out of 314 patients (46%) reported gastrointestinal symptoms. Of 238 patients using 80-100 mg aspirin daily, 145 (61%) recorded gastrointestinal symptoms. Besides aspirin, the use of calcium antagonists was correlated with gastrointestinal symptoms. Of the 128 patients using calcium antagonists, 84 (66%) reported gastrointestinal symptoms. The prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms in H. pylori-positive and -negative patients using aspirin was 48% and 52%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Two weeks after discharge almost 50% of the patients with cardiovascular disease experienced gastrointestinal symptoms, especially patients using aspirin or calcium antagonists. Patients seropositive for H. pylori and using aspirin or calcium antagonists did not have more gastrointestinal discomfort compared to non-infected patients.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the gastrointestinal tract. Mechanisms of protection and healing: current knowledge and future research

The resistance of the gastric mucosa to injury is attributable to a series of factors collectively known as "mucosal defense." Many components of mucosal defense are regulated by prostaglandins and nitric oxide (NO). Thus, inhibition of the production of these mediators predisposes the stomach to injury. Administration of these agents, as synthetic prostaglandins or NO donors, can restore mucosal defense and thereby prevent damage induced by several irritants. Repair of gastric ulcers is also influenced by NO and prostaglandins. Furthermore, a variety of growth factors appear to play critical roles in stimulating the formation of granulation tissue (the "foundation" for repair), the formation of new blood vessels, and the proliferation of epithelial cells. Better understanding of the factors that regulate ulcer healing should provide clues for the development of drugs that can produce better "quality" healing of ulcers.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug gastropathy at the new millennium: mechanisms and prevention

OBJECTIVES

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-induced gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity remains the most frequent adverse drug event in the United States. The objective of this review is to update clinicians in recent advances in basic and clinical investigation regarding the pathogenesis and management of NSAID gastropathy.

METHODS

Based upon an extensive review of the published literature and abstracts of key work within the past decade, the framework for new approaches to the prevention and treatment of NSAID-associated ulceration is summarized.

RESULTS

The pathophysiology of NSAID-induced injury to the GI tract is multifaceted and includes both prostaglandin-dependent and independent components. The pharmaceutical industry has capitalized on the identification of two different isoforms of cyclooxygenase, enabling the development of specific inhibitors of one isoform that minimizes prostaglandin-dependent mechanisms that contribute to NSAID-induced injury. Clinical trials support the efficacy and reduced toxicity of these agents. Because acid exacerbates the injury initiated by NSAIDs, potent acid suppressive therapy, typically with proton pump inhibitors, is another common approach to the treatment of NSAID-related dyspepsia as well as NSAID-induced ulcer disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Recent improvements in the understanding of NSAID-induced damage and new drug development have provided the opportunity for effective anti-inflammatory therapy with reduced GI toxicity. This illustrates the importance of identifying patients at risk for potential complications and the appropriate use of strategies to prevent and treat NSAID-induced complications.