Review article: genetic testing and counselling for hereditary colorectal cancer

Constipation Misperception: Could It Be Familial Adenomatosis Polyposis?

Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States. Familial adenomatosis polyposis (FAP) is a rare cause of colorectal cancer. The United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends screening for colorectal cancer in average-risk, asymptomatic adults aged 50 to 75 years. While age is the most important risk factor, we need to consider the family history of colorectal cancer. FAP is a rare cause of colorectal cancer, leading to high morbidity and mortality if undetected and undiagnosed. It is easy to overlook the family history in a busy primary care clinic with limited patient encounter times. Clinicians mustn't forget this important piece of information as it can give leads for further patient evaluation. We present a case report of a 21-year-old male who presented to our clinic to establish primary care and with vague abdominal complaints. Still, the concerning family history of early onset colon cancer in his half-sister raised red flags and directed us to further evaluate. Further evaluation revealed our patient, in fact, had FAP.

Accumulated genetic mutations leading to accelerated initiation and progression of colorectal cancer in a patient with Gardner syndrome: A case report

RATIONALE

Gardner syndrome is a rare autosomal dominant disorder with a high degree of penetrance, which is characterized by intestinal polyposis, osteomas, and dental abnormalities. Majority of patients with Gardner syndrome will develop colorectal cancer by the age of 40 to 50 years. Mutations in the adenomatous polyposis coli gene are supposed to be responsible for the initiation of Gardner syndrome.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 22-year-old Chinese female was admitted to our hospital due to abdominal pain and bloody stool.

DIAGNOSIS

The patient presented with multiple intestinal polyposis, desmoid tumors, and dental abnormalities was diagnosed as Gardner syndrome and further examination revealed a colon tumor.

INTERVENTIONS AND OUTCOMES

Patients were implanted with stents to alleviate bowel obstruction, and were treated with oxaliplatin combined with 5-Fu for 4 cycles, but the efficacy was not good. We performed next generation sequencing of 390 genes for the tumor specimens. We detected adenomatous polyposis coli E1538Ifs∗5, KRAS G12D, NF1 R652C, loss of SMAD4, TP53 R175H, IRF2 p.R82S, TCF7L2 p.A418Tfs∗14, and SMAD4 p.L43F in this patient.

LESSONS

We reported serial mutations in key genes responsible for initiation and progression of colorectal cancer from a patient with Gardner syndrome.

Increased serological, cancer-associated protein biomarker levels at diagnosis of large bowel adenoma: Risk of subsequent primary malignancy?

BACKGROUND

Blood-based, cancer-associated biomarkers may detect subjects at risk of having neoplastic diseases. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether elevated serological protein biomarker levels may identify adenoma patients, who are at increased risk of being diagnosed with subsequent primary malignancy.

METHODS

Levels of CEA, CA19-9, TIMP-1 and YKL-40 were determined in blood samples collected prior to diagnostic bowel endoscopy due to symptoms of colorectal neoplasia. Follow-up time was ten years, and identified adenoma patients, who were diagnosed with subsequent primary intra- or extra-colonic malignant diseases. The biomarker levels were also determined in 400 subjects, who underwent diagnostic colonoscopy, had clean colorectum and were without apparent co-morbidity; these levels were used as reference levels. In the present study, biomarkers were interpreted as elevated when levels were above the reference intervals adjusting for age and gender. The 1-year and 5-years cumulative incidences were calculated.

RESULTS

Primary malignancies were identified in 175 (19%) of the 923 subjects diagnosed with adenomas at the primary bowel endoscopy. In detail, 20 of the 175 subjects were diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) and 155 subjects with extra-colonic cancers. Thirty patients were diagnosed with malignancy within the first year. Three groups were established: 0: no elevated biomarkers; 1: 1 of the 4 biomarkers elevated; and 2: ≥2 biomarkers elevated. The cumulative 5-years incidence of malignancy was: 0: 6.9%; 1: 11.8%; and 2: 17.5% (p = .0009).

CONCLUSION

Elevated blood-based, cancer-associated protein biomarker levels in subjects diagnosed with adenomas at large bowel endoscopy identifies subjects at increased risk of being diagnosed with subsequent primary malignancy.

Worldwide Practice Patterns in Lynch Syndrome Diagnosis and Management, Based on Data From the International Mismatch Repair Consortium

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Families with a history of Lynch syndrome often do not adhere to guidelines for genetic testing and screening. We investigated practice patterns related to Lynch syndrome worldwide, to ascertain potential targets for research and public policy efforts.

METHODS

We collected data from the International Mismatch Repair Consortium (IMRC), which comprises major research and clinical groups engaged in the care of families with Lynch syndrome worldwide. IMRC institutions were invited to complete a questionnaire to characterize diagnoses of Lynch syndrome and management practice patterns.

RESULTS

Fifty-five providers, representing 63 of 128 member institutions (49%) in 21 countries, completed the questionnaire. For case finding, 55% of respondents reported participating in routine widespread population tumor testing among persons with newly diagnosed Lynch syndrome-associated cancers, whereas 27% reported relying on clinical criteria with selective tumor and/or germline analyses. Most respondents (64%) reported using multigene panels for germline analysis, and only 28% reported testing tumors for biallelic mutations for cases in which suspected pathogenic mutations were not confirmed by germline analysis. Respondents reported relying on passive dissemination of information to at-risk family members, and there was variation in follow through of genetic testing recommendations. Reported risk management practices varied-nearly all programs (98%) recommended colonoscopy every 1 to 2 years, but only 35% recommended chemoprevention with aspirin.

CONCLUSIONS

There is widespread heterogeneity in management practices for Lynch syndrome worldwide among IMRC member institutions. This may reflect the rapid pace of emerging technology, regional differences in resources, and the lack of definitive data for many clinical questions. Future efforts should focus on the large numbers of high-risk patients without access to state-of-the-art Lynch syndrome management.

Frequency of colonic adenomatous polyps in a tertiary hospital in Mumbai

INTRODUCTION

Incidence of colorectal carcinoma is increasing all over world. There is limited data on colorectal polyps from India. We evaluated the histomorphological features of colorectal polyps and determined risk stratification in adenomatous polyps.

METHODS

In 4970 consecutive colonoscopies, colorectal polyps were detected in 515 cases (10.3 %). Polyps were classified using standard histological criteria. Each polyp was evaluated for presence of dysplasia. Adenomatous polyps were classified as low-risk adenomas (1-2 tubular adenomas <10 mm) and high-risk adenomas characterized by villous histology, high-grade dysplasia, size ≥10 mm, or ≥3 adenomas.

RESULTS

Of 515 colorectal polyps, 270 (52.4 %) were adenomatous, followed by 78 (15.1 %) inflammatory, 78 (15.1 %) hyperplastic, 32 (6.2 %) hamartomatous polyps, 25 (4.8 %) benign epithelial polyps, 5 (0.9 %) cap polyps, 5 (0.9 %) lipomatous polyps, 3 (0.5 %) angiomatous polyps, 4 (0.7 %) lymphoid, and 15 (2.9 %) cases with adenocarcinoma masquerading as polyps. Mean (SD) age with colorectal polyps was 54.8 (33.0) years while for adenomatous polyps, 59.5 (14.8) years with male to female ratio of 2:1. Majority of adenomatous polyps 124 (45.9 %) were tubular adenomas present in rectosigmoid. High-grade dysplasia was found in 38 (14 %) adenomas. One hundred and fifty-five (57.4 %) were high risk of which majority were villous adenomas and nine (7.2 %) tubular adenomas.

CONCLUSION

The most common colorectal polyps found during routine colonoscopy were 270 adenomatous (52.4 %) cases. Of these, 155 (57.4 %) adenomatous polyps were high-risk category. Population prevalence data of colonic polyps in general population beyond the age of 50 years needs to be obtained.

Hereditary Colorectal Cancer: Genetics and Screening

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer and the third leading cause of cancer death in men and women in the United States. About 30% of patients with CRC report a family history of CRC. However, only 5% of CRCs arise in the setting of a well-established mendelian inherited disorder. In addition, serrated polyposis is a clinically defined syndrome with multiple serrated polyps in the colorectum and an increased CRC risk for which the genetics are unknown. This article focuses on genetic and clinical aspects of Lynch syndrome, familial adenomatous polyposis, and MUTYH-associated polyposis.

Guidelines on genetic evaluation and management of Lynch syndrome: a consensus statement by the US Multi-Society Task Force on colorectal cancer

The Multi-Society Task Force, in collaboration with invited experts, developed guidelines to assist health care providers with the appropriate provision of genetic testing and management of patients at risk for and affected with Lynch syndrome as follows: Figure 1 provides a colorectal cancer risk assessment tool to screen individuals in the office or endoscopy setting; Figure 2 illustrates a strategy for universal screening for Lynch syndrome by tumor testing of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer; Figures 3-6 provide algorithms for genetic evaluation of affected and at-risk family members of pedigrees with Lynch syndrome; Table 10 provides guidelines for screening at-risk and affected persons with Lynch syndrome; and Table 12 lists the guidelines for the management of patients with Lynch syndrome. A detailed explanation of Lynch syndrome and the methodology utilized to derive these guidelines, as well as an explanation of, and supporting literature for, these guidelines are provided.

Guidelines on genetic evaluation and management of Lynch syndrome: a consensus statement by the US Multi-society Task Force on colorectal cancer

The Multi-Society Task Force, in collaboration with invited experts, developed guidelines to assist health care providers with the appropriate provision of genetic testing and management of patients at risk for and affected with Lynch syndrome as follows: Figure 1 provides a colorectal cancer risk assessment tool to screen individuals in the office or endoscopy setting; Figure 2 illustrates a strategy for universal screening for Lynch syndrome by tumor testing of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer; Figures 3,4,5,6 provide algorithms for genetic evaluation of affected and at-risk family members of pedigrees with Lynch syndrome; Table 10 provides guidelines for screening at-risk and affected persons with Lynch syndrome; and Table 12 lists the guidelines for the management of patients with Lynch syndrome. A detailed explanation of Lynch syndrome and the methodology utilized to derive these guidelines, as well as an explanation of, and supporting literature for, these guidelines are provided.

Gardner's syndrome, a rare combination in surgical practice

A 45-year-old man presented to the emergency ward with features of intestinal obstruction of 2 days duration. On admission, there was abdominal distension and multiple sessile polyps found on digital rectal examination. In addition, a soft tissue swelling near the elbow and a bony swelling over scalp were noted. Abdominal radiography revealed gaseous distension of the small and large bowel, and ultrasound revealed diffuse, gas-filled bowel with sluggish peristalsis. The obstruction failed to resolve with conservative measures and at emergency laparotomy an irregular hard recto-sigmoid junction mass was identified. A defunctioning transverse loop colostomy was undertaken and the abdomen closed. During recovery, a colonoscopy was performed and a malignant appearing lesion was identified 15 cm proximal to the anal verge. Further per-stomal colonoscopy revealed multiple sessile polyps from the ileo-caecal valve to the descending colon. The cutaneous and abdominal findings were consistent with a rare acute presentation of Gardner's syndrome.

Knowledge of and practice patterns for hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes in korean surgical residents

Purpose

Obtaining a detailed family history through detailed pedigree is essential in recognizing hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC) syndromes. This study was performed to assess the current knowledge and practice patterns of surgery residents regarding familial risk of CRC.

Methods

A questionnaire survey was performed to evaluate the knowledge and the level of recognition for analyses of family histories and hereditary CRC syndromes in 62 residents of the Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital. The questionnaire consisted of 22 questions regarding practice patterns for, knowledge of, and resident education about hereditary CRC syndromes.

Results

Two-thirds of the residents answered that family history should be investigated at the first interview, but only 37% of them actually obtained pedigree detailed family history at the very beginning in actual clinical practice. Three-quarters of the residents answered that the quality of family history they obtained was poor. Most of them could diagnose hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer and recommend an appropriate colonoscopy surveillance schedule; however, only 19% knew that cancer surveillance guidelines differed according to the family history. Most of our residents lacked knowledge of cancer genetics, such as causative genes, and diagnostic methods, including microsatellite instability test, and indicated a desire and need for more education regarding hereditary cancer and genetic testing during residency.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that surgical residents' knowledge of hereditary cancer was not sufficient and that the quality of the family histories obtained in current practice has to be improved. More information regarding hereditary cancer should be considered in education programs for surgery residents.

Population screening for hereditary and familial cancer syndromes in Valka district of Latvia

Background

The growing possibilities of cancer prevention and treatment as well as the increasing knowledge about hereditary cancers require proper identification of the persons at risk. The aim of this study was to test the outcome of population screening in the scientific and practical evaluation of hereditary cancer.

Methods

Population screening for hereditary cancer was carried out retrospectively in a geographic area of Latvia. Family cancer histories were collected from 18642 adults representing 76.6% of the population of this area. Hereditary cancer syndromes were diagnosed clinically. Molecular testing for BRCA1 founder mutations 300 T/G, 4153delA and 5382insC was conducted in 588 persons who reported at least one case of breast or ovary cancer among blood relatives.

Results

Clinically, 74 (0.40%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.32 - 0.50%) high-risk and 548 (2.94%, 95% CI: 2.71 - 3.19) moderate-risk hereditary cancer syndromes were detected covering wide cancer spectrum. All syndromes were characterised by high cancer frequency among blood relatives ranging 8.6 - 46.2% in contrast to spouse correlation of 2.5 - 3.6%. The mean age of cancer onset ranged 38.0 - 72.0 years in different syndromes. The BRCA1 gene mutations were identified in 10 (1.7%; 95% CI: 0.9 - 3.1%) probands. Families with established BRCA1 gene founder mutations were identified with the frequency 1:2663 clinically screened persons.

Conclusions

Population screening is a useful practical tool for the identification of persons belonging to families with high frequency of malignant tumours. The whole hereditary and familial cancer spectrum along with the age structure was identified adjusting follow-up guidelines. Another benefit of the population screening is the possibility to identify oncologically healthy persons belonging to hereditary and familial cancer families so that appropriate surveillance can be offered. Clinical diagnostics is appropriate for population screening purposes; molecular investigation provides additional information. In collaboration with family doctors, the screening is technically manageable as characterised by high compliance.

Pediatric adenomatous polyposis syndromes: an update

Juvenile polyps are a common finding in the pediatric population. In contrast, colon adenomas, which are viewed as dysplastic precancerous lesions, are found sporadically in late adulthood. Adenomas in children and young adults are highly unusual and suggest one of several forms of inherited colorectal cancer. These disorders show a predilection to early adenoma formation and can present in childhood. Familial adenomatous polyposis and Lynch syndrome are autosomal dominant, often with involvement of multiple family members, or can be seen in an individual arising from a de novo mutation. The most recently described adenomatous polyposis syndrome, MutYH-associated polyposis, is autosomal recessive, requiring an inherited mutation from each parent. All three adenomatous polyposis disorders can display tremendous variation in expression, even within the same family, and can have a common overlapping phenotype. These disorders require regular medical care to minimize cancer risk in the digestive tract and in other organ systems.

Genetic testing for colon cancer

Colon cancer remains the third leading cause of death due to cancer in the US, where it affected more than 145,000 individuals in 2005. Up to 30% of these cases exhibit familial clustering, which means that tens of thousands of individuals have a disease with a potentially definable genetic component. Approximately 3-5% of colon cancers are associated with high-risk, inherited colon cancer syndromes. Identification of the genes that cause these colon cancer syndromes, coupled with additional insights into their clinical course, has led to the development of specific management guidelines--and genetic tests--that can diagnose these familial disorders. These guidelines can be life-saving, not only for the affected patient, but also for their family members.

Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance

Screening and surveillance substantially reduce both the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer. Screening of normal-risk individuals may be accomplished by several methods, including fecal occult blood testing, fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy, double contrast barium enema, and colonoscopy. New technologies for screening are being developed, such as fecal immunochemical testing for blood,fecal DNA testing, and virtual colonoscopy. Patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer, such as those with a positive family history, previous adenomatous polyps or cancer, and inflammatory bowel disease, should be offered more intensive evaluation and surveillance.

Familial adenomatous polyposis

Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is an autosomal-dominant colorectal cancer syndrome, caused by a germline mutation in the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene, on chromosome 5q21. It is characterized by hundreds of adenomatous colorectal polyps, with an almost inevitable progression to colorectal cancer at an average age of 35 to 40 yr. Associated features include upper gastrointestinal tract polyps, congenital hypertrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium, desmoid tumors, and other extracolonic malignancies. Gardner syndrome is more of a historical subdivision of FAP, characterized by osteomas, dental anomalies, epidermal cysts, and soft tissue tumors. Other specified variants include Turcot syndrome (associated with central nervous system malignancies) and hereditary desmoid disease. Several genotype-phenotype correlations have been observed. Attenuated FAP is a phenotypically distinct entity, presenting with fewer than 100 adenomas. Multiple colorectal adenomas can also be caused by mutations in the human MutY homologue (MYH) gene, in an autosomal recessive condition referred to as MYH associated polyposis (MAP). Endoscopic screening of FAP probands and relatives is advocated as early as the ages of 10-12 yr, with the objective of reducing the occurrence of colorectal cancer. Colectomy remains the optimal prophylactic treatment, while the choice of procedure (subtotal vs proctocolectomy) is still controversial. Along with identifying better chemopreventive agents, optimizing screening of extracolonic cancers and applying new radiological and endoscopic technology to the diagnosis and management of extracolonic features are the major challenges for the future.

Referrals of patients to colorectal cancer genetics services in south-east Scotland

The discovery that genetic factors are involved in the aetiology of colorectal cancer, has prompted many relatives of affected individuals to seek genetic counselling and screening. This paper describes the demand for genetic services by families with colorectal cancer in south-east Scotland, their expectations and views of the service offered. The annual referral rate over the 21-month study period, for patients with a family history of colorectal cancer, was 0.11 per 1000 patients on general practitioner lists. This is one third of the rate for patients with a family history of breast cancer and in comparison with the breast cancer group, relatives of colorectal cancer patients were significantly older and less socially deprived. Approximately one third were referred via a hospital specialist unit. One hundred patients were included in the study. Mean (+/- standard deviation) age was 43 (+/- 10.7 years), 75 were female and 31 were self referrals. Before the consultation, almost half the patients had an inflated perception of their risk and there was little change at follow-up. There was an improvement in objective understanding after counselling which was sustained up to 6 months but only two thirds remembered their objective risk accurately. Most patients were satisfied with the consultation. Our findings suggest the need to educate individuals, in particular men, younger people and the more socially deprived, about the relevance of a family history of colorectal cancer and to facilitate patients' comprehension of their risk status.

Predictive testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: subjective perception regarding colorectal and endometrial cancer, distress, and health-related behavior at one year post-test

This study evaluated illness representations, distress, and health-related behavior one year after disclosure of a predictive genetic test result for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) in 36 carriers and 36 noncarriers. Post-test, no significant differences between carriers and noncarriers were found in perceived risk and perceived seriousness of colorectal and endometrial cancer or in perceived control over endometrial cancer. Confidence in the controllability of colorectal cancer by means of medical examinations was higher for carriers than noncarriers post-test. Mean levels of distress (cancer-specific distress, state anxiety, psychoneuroticism) were within normal ranges and none of the participants had an overall pattern (on all scales) of clinically elevated levels of distress. Carriers had significantly higher cancer-related distress one year posttest than noncarriers. In both groups, colorectal cancer-related distress decreased. Noncarriers additionally showed decreased endometrial cancer-related distress and state anxiety. Within the year after testing, none of the noncarriers had a colonoscopy and all carriers where adherent to the recommendations regarding colorectal cancer screening. Although interview data delineated individually different problems specifically related to predictive testing (e.g., worry, difficulties in relation to other relatives, burden of regular follow-up), generally, predictive testing for HNPCC does not seem to induce major psychological problems. Moreover, the presented data are promising regarding the impact on health-related behavior.

Inherited susceptibility to colorectal cancer

The principal Mendelian disorders predisposing to colorectal cancer are familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). FAP is due to mutations in the APC gene. HNPCC is due to a mutation in one of at least five mismatch repair genes. Identification of individuals with these conditions is important because colon cancer will occur in approximately 80% and onset is early. For FAP, protein truncation testing will identify the vast majority of mutations. For HNPCC, 80%-95% can be identified by microsatellite instability testing. A current U.S. study reports that 12% of consecutive colorectal cancers have high microsatellite instability and that, of this 12%, 25% have detectable mutations of MLH1, MSH2, or MSH6. Potential benefits of identification include improved compliance with recommended surveillance, early detection of polyps, reduction in cancer mortality, offering of testing to relatives, and reassurance for relatives found to be negative with attendant savings in the time and expense of surveillance.

Screening for an inherited susceptibility to colorectal cancer

The principal Mendelian disorders predisposing to colorectal cancer are familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). FAP is caused by mutations in the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene. HNPCC is caused by a mutation in one of at least five mismatch repair genes. It is important to identify individuals with these conditions because colon cancer will occur in at least 80% and onset is earlier than in the general population. Potential benefits of identification include improved compliance with recommended surveillance, early detection of polyps, reduction in cancer mortality, and reassurance for relatives found to be negative with attendant savings in the time and expense of surveillance. For classic FAP, the large number of polyps readily identifies affected persons. For HNPCC, identification of individuals meriting DNA sequencing requires either recognition of a suspect family history or finding high microsatellite instability in a tumor. Individuals accepting the offer of genetic counseling and DNA testing often have more cancers in their family, are motivated to inform relatives, have a larger social network, and have more confidence in their coping ability. Individuals who decline are often concerned about their own or their family's emotional reaction or fear discrimination.

A clinician's guide to hereditary colon cancer

Approximately 10% of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer are at risk for a hereditary form of the disease. At-risk patients can be offered genetic counseling and testing to determine whether they carry a detectable mutation for such a syndrome. If so, this information provides the clinician with valuable data about the patient's risk for other cancers, and what further surveillance and risk reduction options should be incorporated into the management plan. Mutation identification within a family also makes it possible for other family members to learn if they are at risk for the same syndrome. There are many hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes, and the clinician must know what essential information should be elicited from a family history and which patients should be referred for genetic counseling and testing.

The I1307K APC mutation in a high-risk clinic setting: a follow-up study

While the I1307K APC mutation clearly confers an increased lifetime risk for colorectal cancer, there is a paucity of data on the natural history of colonic neoplasia in symptomatic and asymptomatic mutation carriers. In this study, 51 Jewish I1307K APC mutation carriers were identified in a high-risk familial cancer clinic over a 4-year period, of whom 29 (56.8%) (four males and 25 females) were successfully telephone interviewed for 0.5-5 years (mean 2.4 +/- 1.4) after initial genetic testing. Of these 29 cases, one individual was diagnosed with colon cancer at the age of 45 years, five had adenomatous polyps (mean number of polyps = 1.8), 11 had breast cancer (mean age at diagnosis 49.5 +/- 10.5 years), and 12 were asymptomatic, at the time of the testing. During the follow-up period, new colonic polyps were diagnosed in three mutation carriers, two with previously diagnosed colon cancer and polyps and only one of the asymptomatic mutation carriers, and two additional previously affected patients had new cancer diagnoses: gastric cancer and melanoma. From this descriptive study, it seems that the short-term risk for colonic polyps in I1307K APC mutation is low, primarily affecting patients with previously diagnosed colon tumors.

Genetic testing for high-risk colon cancer patients

Colorectal cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths in both men and women in the United States and is estimated to have affected 148,000 people in 2002. The cumulative lifetime risk for colon cancer is approximately 5%-6%, and this risk is influenced by hereditary and lifestyle factors. In fact, 20%-30% of all colon cancer cases have a potentially definable inherited cause, and 3%-5% of colon cancers occur in genetically defined high-risk colon cancer family syndromes. Although the genes responsible for the cases of moderate-risk colon cancer remain to be characterized, many of the genes responsible for the high-risk colon cancer cases have already been determined. These genetic discoveries have been translated into clinical practice and have led to improved risk assessment through the use of genetic testing. The introduction into clinical practice of genetic testing for the assessment of colon cancer risk has led to more effective management strategies for patients with potentially high-risk colon cancer and has presented new challenges to the clinician because of the unique issues involved with genetic testing. In this review, an overview of the colon cancer high-risk syndromes, with a focus on the availability and indications for genetic testing, is presented.