The New Deal - a poor deal for service and training?

Rheumatology training in the United Kingdom: the trainees' perspective

BACKGROUND

Rheumatology training has undergone significant changes in the last decade with Calmanization, implementation of the New Deal for junior doctors and newer educational strategies for improving musculoskeletal training, like a core curriculum. However, concerns have been expressed about the quality of postgraduate training programmes in the UK.

OBJECTIVES

First, to assess current trainees' perceptions of the quality of core and subspecialty training, the impact of workload on training, and to explore demographic variations in training experience. Secondly, to identify educational strategies that trainees felt would enhance their training.

METHODS

The questionnaire was initially distributed to all specialist registrars attending the BSR Annual Meeting in Brighton in April 2002. Subsequently, the questionnaire was posted to all registrars on the Joint Committee for Higher Medical Training list with a reminder after 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Trainees rated positively training in routine patient care, musculoskeletal examination and injection skills while training in primary care rheumatology, epidemiology, paediatric rheumatology and sports medicine was rated negatively. There is agreement that the reduction in junior doctors' hours has adversely affected training, and issues relating to workload have overtaken training issues. Trainees undertaking dual accreditation are more likely to feel this. Educational strategies deemed to enhance training included training workshops focused on specific topics, such as musculoskeletal radiology (89.2%), and an adequate debriefing session after an out-patient clinic (81.6%). An independently administered, reliable and valid scale for quality of training could be used to assess regional variations in training and monitoring quality.

CONCLUSIONS

The changes to junior doctors' hours, the working patterns of doctors and service commitments have all affected the quality and time available for certain aspects of rheumatological training. A major effort to enhance quality is necessary to ensure that the objectives of training are met within the intended training budget.

Education and the working patterns of junior doctors in the UK: a review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

To identify and review UK research relating to the effects of patterns of work on the education of junior doctors, describe the trends in the research, contextualise the progress of the UK in reducing the number of hours worked by junior doctors alongside that of other countries and identify areas for future research.

METHOD

A total of 77 research studies, mostly written after 1995, were identified as relevant from approximately 900 references generated by searching Medline and using a 'snowball' technique. The articles identified were qualitatively reviewed to identify their key research conclusions and/or the main points of argument. These were collated and presented in a qualitative review.

RESULTS

Research in the UK is contradictory regarding the effects of working patterns and the views of doctors towards them. Further research is needed to examine in depth the differences in the effects of working patterns on education between hard-pressed and non hard-pressed specialties, hospitals and regions. When viewed in an international context, the UK ranks among a number of countries with similar medical systems that are moving towards reducing the hours worked by doctors in training, all of which are at different points in the process.

CONCLUSION

The literature review has helped to identify the popular wisdom surrounding the debate on junior doctors' hours, the progress of the UK when compared to that of other countries and gaps in research. Further research is needed to refine understanding of this area.

Working patterns of trainee anaesthetists in the UK: results of a national postal survey

The 'New Deal' restrictions on junior doctors' hours have major implications for the staffing of anaesthetic departments and the provision of adequate training. The results of a national postal survey demonstrate a decline in traditional on-call arrangements, especially in hard-pressed work sectors such as intensive care. A substantial number of anaesthetic departments have still completely to satisfy the hours restrictions in many work sectors. Many departments experience recruitment difficulties and express concern about both service and training issues.