A comparison of the effects of aspirin on bleeding time measured using the Simplate method and closure time measured using the PFA-100, in healthy volunteers

A Systematic Review on the Effect of Common Medications on Platelet Count and Function: Which Medications Should Be Stopped Before Getting a Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection?

Background:

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) exerts its effect through the release of growth factors and cytokines from the platelet concentrate. Certain medications may affect platelet count or function, resulting in decreased efficacy of PRP injections.

Purpose:

To systematically review the literature regarding common medications and their effects on platelets to establish guidelines for which medications should be stopped before obtaining a PRP injection.

Study Design:

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 2.

Methods:

This review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. A search for studies assessing the effect of common medications on platelet count or platelet function was performed of the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and OpenGrey databases. Inclusion criteria were as follows: drug studied was aspirin, acetaminophen, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), a statin, or gabapentin; human participants; and article in the English language. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies—of Interventions tool.

Results:

A total of 1711 studies were identified through the initial search, with 20 studies meeting all inclusion criteria. No studies involving gabapentin met all inclusion criteria. Patients treated with aspirin (268 patients) or acetaminophen (13 patients) showed a significant decrease in platelet aggregation. Statin therapy (73 patients) did not result in a significant decrease in platelet aggregation. Patients who took NSAIDs (172 patients) demonstrated significantly decreased platelet aggregation only when treated with nonselective formulations. Those treated with cyclooxygenase (COX)-2–selective NSAIDs showed no significant difference in platelet aggregation. Treatment with aspirin, acetaminophen, statins, or NSAIDs did not lead to a significant decrease in platelet count.

Conclusion:

Aspirin, acetaminophen, and nonselective NSAIDs should be considered for suspension before a PRP injection because of their potential to diminish the effects of the injection. COX-2–selective NSAIDs and statins do not need to be withheld before a PRP injection.

Effects of the Btk-Inhibitors Remibrutinib (LOU064) and Rilzabrutinib (PRN1008) With Varying Btk Selectivity Over Tec on Platelet Aggregation and in vitro Bleeding Time

Background: Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) are used in B-cell malignancies and in development against various autoimmune diseases. Since Btk is also involved in specific pathways of platelet activation, BTKi might be considered to target platelet GPVI/GPIb-mediated atherothrombosis and platelet FcγRIIA-dependent immune disorders. However, BTKi treatment of patients with B-cell malignancies is frequently associated with mild bleeding events caused possibly by off-target inhibition of Tec. Here, we compared the platelet effects of two novel BTKi that exhibit a high (remibrutinib) or low (rilzabrutinib) selectivity for Btk over Tec.

Methods and Results: Remibrutinib and rilzabrutinib were pre-incubated with anticoagulated blood. Platelet aggregation and in vitro bleeding time (closure time) were studied by multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) and platelet-function analyzer-200 (PFA-200), respectively. Both BTKi inhibited atherosclerotic plaque-stimulated GPVI-mediated platelet aggregation, remibrutinib being more potent (IC₅₀ = 0.03 μM) than rilzabrutinib (IC₅₀ = 0.16 μM). Concentrations of remibrutinib (0.1 μM) and rilzabrutinib (0.5 μM), >80% inhibitory for plaque-induced aggregation, also significantly suppressed (>90%) the Btk-dependent pathways of platelet aggregation upon GPVI, von Willebrand factor/GPIb and FcγRIIA activation stimulated by low collagen concentrations, ristocetin and antibody cross-linking, respectively. Both BTKi did not inhibit aggregation stimulated by ADP, TRAP-6 or arachidonic acid. Remibrutinib (0.1 μM) only slightly prolonged closure time and significantly less than rilzabrutinib (0.5 μM).

Conclusion: Remibrutinib and rilzabrutinib inhibit Btk-dependent pathways of platelet aggregation upon GPVI, VWF/GPIb, and FcγRIIA activation. Remibrutinib being more potent and showing a better profile of inhibition of Btk-dependent platelet activation vs. hemostatic impairment than rilzabrutinib may be considered for further development as an antiplatelet drug.

How important is aspirin adherence when evaluating effectiveness of low-dose aspirin?

Low-dose aspirin (LDA) is advocated for women at high-risk of pre-eclampsia, providing a modest, 10%, reduction in risk. Cardiology meta-analyses demonstrate 18% reduction in serious vascular events with LDA. Non-responsiveness to aspirin (sometimes termed aspirin resistance) and variable clinical effectiveness are often attributed to suboptimal adherence. The aim of this review was to identify the scope of adherence assessments in RCTs evaluating aspirin effectiveness in cardiology and obstetrics and discuss the quality of information provided by current methods. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library, limited to humans and English language, for RCTs evaluating aspirin in cardiology; 14/03/13-13/03/16 and pregnancy 1957-13/03/16. Search terms; 'aspirin', 'acetylsalicylic acid' appearing adjacent to 'myocardial infarction' or 'pregnancy', 'pregnant', 'obstetric' were used. 38% (25/68) of obstetric and 32% (20/62) of cardiology RCTs assessed aspirin adherence and 24% (6/25) and 29% (6/21) of obstetric and cardiology RCTs, respectively, defined acceptable adherence. Semi-quantitative methods (pill counts, medication weighing) prevailed in obstetric RCTs (93%), qualitative methods (interviews, questionnaires) were more frequent in obstetrics (67%). Two obstetric RCTs quantified serum thromboxane B₂ and salicylic acid, but no quantitative methods were used in cardiology Aspirin has proven efficacy, but suboptimal adherence is widespread and difficult to accurately quantify. Little is currently known about aspirin adherence in pregnancy. RCTs evaluating aspirin effectiveness show over-reliance on qualitative adherence assessments vulnerable to inherent inaccuracies. Reliable adherence data is important to assess and optimise the clinical effectiveness of LDA. We propose that adherence should be formally assessed in future trials and that development of quantitative assessments may prove valuable for trial protocols.

Variables That Affect Results of PFA-100 in a Group of Healthy Blood Donors in the Slovak Population

Background: The platelet function analyzer (PFA-100) is a system analyzing platelet function determined for detection of the functional inherited and acquired platelet disorders, screening of von Willebrand disease (vWD) and recently also considered as useful for monitoring of antiplatelet treatment. The PFA-100 test uses a high shear flow system to simulate in vitro the conditions to which platelets are subjected at the site of a damaged blood vessel wall.

Aim of study: We decided to establish the reference intervals of PFA closure time (CT) in the Slovak population of healthy blood donors.

Patients and methods: Fifty age and gender matched healthy blood donors were enrolled in the study. We investigated the relationships between PFA-100 CT, gender and ABO blood groups.

Results: The reference intervals for CT measured on CEPI (collagen/epinephrine) and CADP (collagen/adenosine diphosphate) cartridge in 3.2% citrated blood were 86 - 199 sec. and 42 - 119 sec., respectively. Blood group O was associated with significantly longer CEPI CT (p<0.05) compared to non - O groups. The prolongation of CADP CT in blood donors with blood group O was without significance. The influence of gender as another variable analyzed with CT has not been evaluated as statistically significant.

Conclusion: PFA-100 CT should be interpreted carefully with consideration of both the patient’s clinical presentation and laboratory variables such as ABO blood group.

Low dose aspirin and pregnancy: how important is aspirin resistance?

Antiplatelet agents are pivotal for prevention of coronary artery disease and cerebrovascular disease worldwide. Individual patient data meta-analysis indicates that low-dose aspirin causes a 10% risk reduction in pre-eclampsia for women at high individual risk. However, in the last 15 years it has emerged that a significant proportion of aspirin-treated individuals exhibit suboptimal platelet response, determined biochemically and clinically, termed 'aspirin non-responsiveness', 'aspirin resistance' and 'aspirin treatment failure'. More recently, investigation of aspirin responsiveness has begun in pregnant women. This review explores the history and clinical relevance of 'aspirin resistance' applied to high-risk obstetric populations.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Is 'aspirin resistance' clinically relevant in high-risk obstetrics?

High on-treatment platelet reactivity in peripheral endovascular procedures

The use of aspirin is considered the "gold standard" for the decrease of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with atherosclerosis, including peripheral arterial disease (PAD), whereas a dual-antiplatelet regimen with aspirin and clopidogrel is usually indicated for such patients after angioplasty and stent deployment. However, a substantial number of subsequent adverse events still occur, even in patients who receive double-antiplatelet therapy. The "high on-treatment platelet reactivity" (HTPR) phenomenon has been lately recognized and plays a major role in the management of patients with PAD. Greater and more rapid inhibition of platelet aggregation has become the goal for new antiplatelet agents with the expectation of further improving outcomes for percutaneous intervention for PAD. The purpose of this review article is to highlight current evidence regarding the prevalence, aetiology, and clinical implications of HTPR in PAD as well as to discuss the possibilities of novel alternative antiplatelet regiments.

The platelet-function analyzer (PFA-100 ® ) for evaluating primary hemostasis

The platelet-function analyzer, PFA-100, is a relatively novel method for rapid in vitro global evaluation of primary hemostasis. The aim of this review is to summarize the published studies reporting on the utility of the PFA-100 device as a screening tool for primary hemostasis. Data were identified by searches of the published literature, including PubMed, references from reviews and abstracts from the most important meetings on this topic. The literature data support the use of the PFA-100 as a useful screening tool for the investigation of von Willebrand's disease and other acquired and congenital intrinsic platelet function disorders. Moreover, it is useful for evaluating primary hemostasis before surgical procedures and for monitoring desmopressin therapy in both von Willebrand's disease and platelet function disorders. Given its high sensitivity, speed and simplicity of use, we conclude that the PFA-100 could replace the in vivo bleeding time as a screening test for primary hemostasis in routine clinical practice.

Assessment of platelet inhibition by point-of-care testing in neuroendovascular procedures

Antiplatelet agents are an important component of the preventive strategies currently used in clinical practice to minimize the risk of thromboembolic events during and after endovascular procedures. Because of the variability in the response to antiplatelet agents, measuring the degree of platelet inhibition may help identify and properly treat poor responders. POC testing is defined as diagnostic testing at or near the site of patient care. Knowledge of the specifics of these devices among practicing neurointerventionalists is relatively limited. In this article, the different POC devices available are presented, and their clinical utility in relation to endovascular procedures is discussed.

Aldose reductase, oxidative stress, and diabetic mellitus

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a complex metabolic disorder arising from lack of insulin production or insulin resistance (Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus, 2007). DM is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the developed world, particularly from vascular complications such as atherothrombosis in the coronary vessels. Aldose reductase (AR; ALR2; EC 1.1.1.21), a key enzyme in the polyol pathway, catalyzes nicotinamide adenosine dinucleotide phosphate-dependent reduction of glucose to sorbitol, leading to excessive accumulation of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) in various tissues of DM including the heart, vasculature, neurons, eyes, and kidneys. As an example, hyperglycemia through such polyol pathway induced oxidative stress, may have dual heart actions, on coronary blood vessel (atherothrombosis) and myocardium (heart failure) leading to severe morbidity and mortality (reviewed in Heather and Clarke, 2011). In cells cultured under high glucose conditions, many studies have demonstrated similar AR-dependent increases in ROS production, confirming AR as an important factor for the pathogenesis of many diabetic complications. Moreover, recent studies have shown that AR inhibitors may be able to prevent or delay the onset of cardiovascular complications such as ischemia/reperfusion injury, atherosclerosis, and atherothrombosis. In this review, we will focus on describing pivotal roles of AR in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases as well as other diabetic complications, and the potential use of AR inhibitors as an emerging therapeutic strategy in preventing DM complications.

Point-of-care testing (POCT): Current techniques and future perspectives

Point-of-care testing (POCT) is a laboratory-medicine discipline that is evolving rapidly in analytical scope and clinical application. In this review, we first describe the state of the art of medical-laboratory tests that can be performed near the patient. At present, POCT ranges from basic blood-glucose measurement to complex viscoelastic coagulation assays. POCT shortens the time to clinical decision-making about additional testing or therapy, as delays are no longer caused by transport and preparation of clinical samples, and biochemical-test results are rapidly available at the point of care. Improved medical outcome and lower costs may ensue. Recent, evolving technological advances enable the development of novel POCT instruments. We review the underlying analytical techniques. If new instruments are not yet in practical use, it is often hard to decide whether the underlying analytical principle has real advantage over former methods. However, future utilization of POCT also depends on health-care trends and new areas of application. But, even today, it can be assumed that, for certain applications, near-patient testing is a useful complement to conventional laboratory analyses.

Effect of titanium maxillofacial implants and osteosynthesis materials on platelet function

The use of titanium implants and osteosynthesis materials in orthopaedics, neurosurgery, and maxillofacial surgery has increased considerably, and they may be retained in patients for a long time. We could find no papers in English that provided data about the effect of titanium osteosynthesis materials on platelet function, and the purpose of this study was to evaluate those effects. Platelet function was tested in 33 patients with titanium maxillofacial implants using the PFA-100 (platelet function analyser) system and these results were compared with those of a control group of 34 healthy volunteer blood donors. Platelet function was measured in each group using collagen/adrenaline and collagen/adenosine diphosphate (ADP) as agonists for assessment of platelet function. There were no significant differences between the groups (collagen/adrenaline p=0.1, collagen/ADP p=0.09). Titanium maxillofacial osteosynthesis materials have no significant effect on platelet function as assessed by the PFA-100 system.

Aspirin resistance: Fact or fiction? A point of view

Aspirin is a wonder drug that has been used for well over 100 years for its analgesic and antipyretic effects. For the past three decades, it has increasingly been used for the prevention of primary and secondary cardiovascular events. Lately, it has been suggested that a significant number of individuals taking aspirin have become resistant to this drug. The phenomenon of "aspirin resistance" is based on the observation of clinical events in some patients taking aspirin, and/or a diminished platelet aggregation inhibitory response to aspirin therapy. Unfortunately, laboratory assays used to monitor the efficacy of aspirin are far from accurate and the results are not reproducible. Furthermore, results of different platelet function tests are often not congruent. In addition, platelet aggregation studies show marked inter-individual and intra-individual variability. Patients with coronary heart disease take many drugs that interfere with the effect of aspirin on platelet aggregation. Besides inhibiting formation of thromboxane A(2) from arachidonic acid, aspirin has a host of platelet-independent effects that complement its platelet inhibitory effects. Laboratory assays designed to measure platelet function do not take into account these pleiotropic effects of aspirin. In our view, use of the term "aspirin resistance" based on inadequate knowledge of imperfect laboratory tests does a disservice to physicians and patients.

The effect of aspirin on bleeding after extraction of teeth

Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) generically known as aspirin is used clinically as an analgesic, antipyretic, anti-inflammatory and as a medication to prevent platelet aggregation. Many studies have investigated bleeding associated with ASA.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine if ASA was associated with bleeding after dental extraction.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred and eighty-nine subjects were divided into four groups. Group 1A subjects who received ASA, underwent simple extraction. Group 1B subjects who received ASA, underwent surgical extraction. Group 2A subjects who did not receive ASA, underwent simple extraction which served as control group. Group 2B subjects who did not receive ASA, underwent surgical extraction which also served as control group.

RESULTS

The results showed that Group 1B was the only group which showed bleeding after 24 h. All groups had similar results after 48 h and 5 days post-operatively.

CONCLUSION

The study concluded that subjects who received 81 mg ASA daily could undergo dental extraction without bleeding risks.

The PFA-100® detects sub-optimal antiplatelet responses in patients on aspirin

Although it is suspected that some patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) could have a sub-optimal response to aspirin (SASAR), currently a fixed dose of ASA is long-term used in all individuals. This study was designed to determine SASAR and whether a SASAR is a predictor for recurrence of ischemic events in patients on low-dose ASA with a previous ACS. One hundred patients taking ASA 100 mg/day were assessed at 1 and 6 months after a first ACS. SASAR was initially defined as a failure of the ASA treatment to significantly prolong the closure time in the Platelet Function Analyzer (PFA-100). SASAR in these samples was reconfirmed by conventional aggregometry. TXB2 levels were determined in plasma. At one month 49 patients showed SASAR in the PFA-100; only 25 of them showed SASAR by conventional aggregometry. At six months, 39 of 81 patients showed SASAR by PFA-100, but conventional aggregometry detected SASAR in only 12 of the 39 patients. TXB2 levels were significantly higher in patients with SASAR. Five patients with SASAR, by both tests, died during follow-up (p = 0.013). The PFA-100 detected a high rate of SASAR in patients with ACS. This instrument could be used to screen for suboptimal response to the antiplatelet action of ASA. Whether persistence of SASAR could relate to a higher risk of recurrence and how adjusting the dose of ASA could reduce the rate of SASAR are issues that deserve further investigations.

Point-of-care assessment of antiplatelet agents in the perioperative period: a review

The aim of this paper was to review the strengths and limitations of current 'point-of-care' techniques for the detection of antiplatelet drug effects. The review was based on a Medline search for articles with key words related to "platelet function tests", "point-of-care", and "anaesthesia", published in English between January 1996 and September 2008. It was found that global assessments of 'haemostasis', such as the standard thrombelastograph, Sonoclot, Clot Signature Analyser and Hemodyne, are not specific for platelet function and are essentially insensitive to cyclooxygenase inhibitors (aspirin, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) and P2Y12 antagonists (ticlopidine, clopidogrel). Global assessments of 'platelet function', such as the PFA-100 and PlateletWorks, are more specific for platelet function, but also have limited sensitivity for cyclooxygenase inhibitors and P2Y12 antagonists. The newer devices developed specifically for the assessment of antiplatelet drugs, such as Platelet Mapping, the Impact Cone and Platelet Analyser and the VerifyNow, are more promising, but are not as sensitive as laboratory platelet aggregometry. All three categories of devices detect G(p)II(b)/III(a) antagonists (abciximab, tirofiban, eptifibatide) activity, but not all provide quantitative assessments for monitoring therapy. The limitations appeared to be related to the complexity of platelet function, the multiple pathways of platelet activation, the wide interpatient variability in platelet responses and the interdependence between platelets and other aspects of coagulation. The strengths and limitations of point-of-care devices should be appreciated before they are used to assist clinical decision-making in the perioperative period.

Variability in platelet response to the antiplatelet agents aspirin and clopidogrel: mechanisms, measurement, and clinical relevance

Platelet reactivity (eg, platelet adhesion, activation, aggregation) is the underlying pathology for atherothrombotic processes and subsequent ischemic complications. Antiplatelet drugs, including aspirin, dipyridamole, thienopyridines (clopidogrel and ticlopidine), and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists, have proven efficacy in atherothrombotic event prevention. However, variability of platelet response measured in the laboratory has been reported and is a subject of keen interest.It is unclear to what extent variability of platelet response to antiplatelet agents is associated with clinical outcomes. A better understanding of this issue requires a general consensus for a standard, preferably point-of-care, ex vivo or in vitro assay to determine the effects of antiplatelet agents on key platelet functions. Currently, results using various methods have not yielded an obvious answer. Small-scale studies have examined the correlation between ex vivo inhibition of platelet aggregation or residual platelet activity and clinical endpoints, and although evidence shows that such correlations may exist, results have not been consistent or definitive. Data from large-scale prospective trials are needed to expand our current understanding of the benefits and limitations of utilizing platelet function tests to effectively manage the balance between protection and risks associated with the antiplatelet therapies, aspirin, and clopidogrel.

Prospective, observational study of antiplatelet and coagulation biomarkers as predictors of thromboembolic events after implantation of ventricular assist devices

BACKGROUND

Long-term success in ventricular assist device (VAD) recipients is limited by thromboembolic events, the prediction of which remains elusive. We evaluated the predictive value of aspirin hyporesponsiveness and markers of coagulation and fibrinolysis.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled patients scheduled to undergo VAD implantation between June 2004 and March 2006. Once before surgery, daily during hospitalization, and weekly after discharge we assessed platelet function, measured prothrombin activation fragment 1.2 (F1.2) and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) concentrations, and evaluated aspirin hyporesponsiveness by whole-blood aggregometry and thromboelastography. All patients received 325 mg oral aspirin daily from at least 7 days before VAD implantation. Follow-up continued until heart transplantation, death or closure of the database.

RESULTS

We included 26 patients (median follow-up 315 days, range 9-833 days). In eight (31%) patients, 14 thromboembolic events occurred at a median of 42 (interquartile range 26-131) days. Only six (43%) events based on whole-blood aggregometry and one (7%) based on thromboelastography coincided with aspirin hyporesponsiveness. Within-patient variability was high for both tests (59% and 567%, respectively). Compared with levels before surgery, PAI-1 concentrations were raised for up to 45 days (P <0.0001) and those of F1.2 for up to 3 days (P = 0.0001) after VAD implantation. PAI-1 and F1.2 levels did not rise significantly further before thromboembolic events.

CONCLUSIONS

Aspirin hyporesponsiveness was not associated with raised risk of future clinical thromboembolic events after VAD implantation. Impaired fibrinolysis, demonstrated by raised PAI-1 concentrations, might, however, indicate a predisposition to such events early after surgery.

Iron-induced platelet aggregation measurement: a novel method to measure platelet function in stenting for ST segment elevation myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Iron and (stainless) steel are potent platelet aggregation activators, and may be involved in stent thrombosis, a serious complication after intracoronary stenting. Current platelet function tests are suboptimal, because of inappropriate agonists and/or lack of reproducibility. We tested the feasibility and reproducibility of a novel platelet function test using stainless steel as an agonist and compared it with other platelet function tests.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 111 patients with acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), duplo measurements of iron (Fe)-induced platelet aggregation (FIPA) were performed after clopidogrel, acetylsalicylic acid and/or tirofiban treatment. Within 1 h, citrated blood samples drawn from the femoral sheath before primary percutaneous coronary intervention were added to 100 mg of low carbon steel and after 5 s mixing with vortex, the samples were incubated for 15 min. The ratio between the non-aggregated platelets in the agonist sample and platelets in a reference sample was calculated as the platelet aggregation inhibition.

RESULTS

FIPA measurement was highly reproducible (correlation coefficient (R)=0.942, P<0.001 between duplo samples). FIPA correlated well with adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation (R=0.83, P<0.001) but weakly with platelet function analyser-100 bleeding time (R=0.56, P<0.001). FIPA could be measured in patients in which platelet aggregation could not be measured by platelet function analyser-100 or after adenosine diphosphate.

CONCLUSION

This study showed good reproducibility of a novel platelet function test using stainless steel as an agonist and showed correlation with validated platelet function tests. We found that the novel platelet function test is a suitable test for measurement of platelet aggregation inhibition in patients undergoing stenting for STEMI, even when they are taking multiple antiplatelet regimens.

Laboratory Evaluation of Platelet Function

Platelets play a central role in hemostasis. Consequently, they lie at the heart of many inherited and acquired bleeding disorders and thrombotic events. The diagnosis of these disorders and monitoring of antiplatelet therapy require a thorough understanding of tests that measure platelet quantity and function. This article outlines basic concepts of platelet physiology and describes the tests that are commonly used in the clinical assessment of platelet function.

Screening for aspirin resistance in stable coronary artery patients by three different tests

BACKGROUND

Aspirin (ASA) failure to inhibit in vitro platelet function had been termed ASA resistance. The prevalence of this phenomenon as measured with different platelet function tests varies widely among studies.

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we propose to determine the prevalence of ASA non-responsiveness in stable coronary artery patients using three different tests.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred ninety-one patients with a stable coronary artery disease and receiving secondary ASA prophylaxis (250 mg/day) were tested. For each patient the ASA-induced platelet inhibition was determined using three different tests: Ivy Bleeding time (BT), collagen/epinephrine closure time (CEPI-CT; PFA-100, Dade-Behring) and urinary 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (uTxB2) excretion level. The agreement between these tests was evaluated by kappa statistics test.

RESULTS

The prevalence of biological ASA resistance was 15.7% (n=30), 20.4% (n=39) and 24.6% (n=47) by BT, PFA-100 and UTxB2, respectively. Only fourteen patients (7.3%) were non-responders for two tests: 6 (3.1%) BT/ PFA-100; 1 (0.5%) BT/UTxB2; 7 (3.7%) PFA-100/UTxB2). A poor agreement was found between these three methods and only 3 patients were resistant with all the tests (1.6%).

CONCLUSION

The lack of agreement supposed that different types of aspirin resistance exist. Thus, combination of two tests or more could be a primary solution for a better identification of ASA resistant patients. This hypothesis must be confirmed by a large-scale randomized study with clinically well-defined endpoints.

Relationship between changes in platelet reactivity and changes in platelet receptor expression induced by physical exercise

INTRODUCTION

In previous studies we have consistently shown a significant increase of platelet reactivity after exercise in patients with obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). We also observed a significant individual variability in the response to exercise of platelet reactivity in these patients. Whether exercise-induced changes in platelet reactivity correlate with changes in platelet membrane receptors in patients with CAD is unknown.

METHODS

We studied 26 patients with stable CAD and 10 matched healthy controls who underwent a symptom-limited treadmill exercise stress test. Venous blood samples were collected at rest and within 5 min of peak exercise. Platelet reactivity was measured by the PFA-100 method as time to occlude (closure time, CT) a ring coated with collagen/adenosine diphosphate (C/ADP). Platelet expression of glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa, in both global (CD41) and active form (PAC-1), and P-selectin (CD62P) and formation of leukocyte-platelet aggregates were assessed by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

After exercise CT did not change in controls (85.4+/-12 to 84.0+/-9 s, p=0.37), whereas it decreased in CAD patients (98.8+/-24 to 91.4+/-25 s, p<0.001). After exercise, CD41 and PAC-1 platelet expression increased significantly in CAD patients (p=0.04 for both), but not in controls (p=0.39 and p=0.98, respectively). To evaluate the relationship between the response to exercise of platelet reactivity and of platelet receptor expression, CAD patients were divided into two groups: CAD group 1 (16 patients, decrease in CT >5 s after exercise) and CAD group 2 (10 patients no increase in platelet reactivity after exercise). CD41 and PAC-1 expression increased in CAD group 1 (p=0.008 and p=0.026, respectively) but not in CAD group 2 (p=0.39 and p=0.50, respectively). No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups for changes in CD62P and leukocyte-platelet aggregates.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show that, in patients with stable CAD, an increased platelet reactivity to C/ADP stimulation after exercise, as assessed by the PFA-100 method, is specifically associated with an increased expression of platelet GP IIb/IIIa receptor.

Effects on primary haemostasis of an anti-inflammatory agent with 5-lipoxygenase and cyclooxygenase inhibitory activity

OBJECTIVE

Licofelone ([2,2-dimethyl-6-(4-chlorophenyl)-7-phenyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-pyrrolizine-5-yl]-acetic acid) has been demonstrated to inhibit cyclooxygenase (COX)-1, COX-2, and 5-lipoxygenase. The aim of this study was to investigate the in-vitro effects of licofelone on platelet function. Effects observed were compared with those produced by the classic COX-1 inhibitor aspirin (ASA).

METHODS

Platelet aggregation was assessed by a turbidimetric method. Platelet haemostatic performance was studied with the platelet function analyser (PFA-100), using collagen epinephrine and collagen ADP cartridges. Interaction of platelets with thrombogenic surfaces was analysed by perfusion experiments performed under flow conditions using both parallel and annular chambers.

RESULTS

Licofelone prolonged the lag time of platelet aggregation induced by arachidonic acid and reduced maximal platelet aggregation induced by ADP or collagen. Studies using PFA-100 demonstrated that licofelone (0.1, 1 and 10 muM) significantly prolonged closure times (P < 0.05) with both types of cartridges. In studies with the parallel chamber exposing purified collagen, both licofelone and ASA significantly reduced (P < 0.05) overall platelet interaction with the thrombogenic surface. In studies performed in annular chamber exposing a highly thrombogenic vessel surface, licofelone reduced height and area of the platelet masses deposited (7.0 +/- 0.5 mum; P < 0.005 and 80.2 +/- 17.3 mum; P < 0.05 vs. control 10.6 +/- 0.9 mum and 194.8 +/- 44.7 mum, respectively). ASA also impaired thrombus formation but differences did not reach the levels of statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Under our experimental in-vitro conditions, licofelone interfered with platelet function as demonstrated by a diminished platelet aggregation, being more powerful than ASA and reducing the interaction of platelets with thrombogenic surfaces.

Increased platelet reactivity in unstable angina patients is not related to C-reactive protein levels

Platelets are a major component of thrombi, and coronary thrombosis plays a key role in the pathogenesis of unstable angina (UA). Whether platelet aggregability is increased in UA patients however, is not known. Furthermore, no study has investigated the relationship between platelet reactivity and inflammation in UA patients In this study, venous blood samples were collected at admission in coronary care unit in 37 patients with unstable angina (Braunwald class IIIB) and in 37 sex- and age-matched patients with chronic stable angina (CSA). Patients taking thienopyridine or anticoagulant drugs were excluded from the study, as also were excluded patients with a history of acute myocardial infarction in the previous 12 months. Platelet aggregability was measured on flowing blood as time to occlude a ring coated with collagen-adenosine diphosphate (ADP), using the platelet function analyzer (PFA-100) system. By this method, the time to occlusion (closure time) is taken as a measure of platelet adhesion/aggregability, with shorter times indicating greater platelet reactivity. There were 23 men and 14 women in both groups, and age was 67.7 +/- 8 and 67.5 +/- 8 years in UA and SA, respectively (P = 0.93). Closure time was significantly reduced in UA patients (78.8 +/- 14 s), compared to SA patients (93.3 +/- 19 s, P < 0.001). Among UA patients, serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels had a median value of 5.1 mg/l (bottom and top quartile levels, 1.50-7.95). There was no significant correlation between closure time and CRP levels (r = 0.22, P = 0.29). Our data show that, in patients with unstable angina there is an increase of platelet reactivity in response to ADP/collagen stimulation, which is not related to inflammation.

The influence of acetylsalicylic acid intake by healthy volunteers on duplicate PFA-100 measurements

The PFA-100 device is increasingly used for assessing platelet function. Its use to monitor anti-platelet therapy, like acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), has been described. In most studies single PFA-100 measurements were used. In this study, we evaluate the influence of ASA on duplicate measurements using collagen/epinephrine cartridges. Twelve healthy volunteers received a single dose of 160 mg ASA and 12 other healthy volunteers received 30 mg ASA during 10 days followed by 80 mg ASA during 10 days. PFA-100 measurements were performed in duplicate 1 and 24 h after the final intake of medication. The mean coefficient of variation of duplicate measurements before medication was 8.4% and at least two times higher after the intake of a single dose of 160 mg ASA or 30 mg ASA during 10 days. Per individual, huge differences between duplicate measurements were observed after ASA ingestion. Differences were less pronounced after ingestion of 80 mg ASA during 10 days, because six of 12 volunteers had a maximum PFA-100 value>300 s in both measurements. As a consequence, one should be cautious to use the PFA-100 to monitor ASA therapy in individual patients.

Aspirin resistance

Aspirin resistance is the inability of aspirin to reduce platelet production of thromboxane A2 and thereby platelet activation and aggregation. Increasing degrees of aspirin resistance may correlate independently with increasing risk of cardiovascular events. Aspirin resistance can be detected by laboratory tests of platelet thromboxane A2 production or platelet function that depend on platelet thromboxane production. Potential causes of aspirin resistance include inadequate dose, drug interactions, genetic polymorphisms of COX-1 and other genes involved in thromboxane biosynthesis, upregulation of non-platelet sources of thromboxane biosynthesis, and increased platelet turnover. Aspirin resistance can be overcome by treating the cause or causes, and reduced by minimising thromboxane production and activity, and blocking other pathways of platelet activation. Future research is aimed at defining aspirin resistance, developing reliable tests for it, and establishing the risk of associated cardiovascular events. Potential mechanisms of aspirin resistance can then be explored and treatments assessed.

Platelet function analyzer (PFA)-100 closure time in the evaluation of platelet disorders and platelet function

BACKGROUND

Closure time (CT), measured by platelet function analyzer (PFA-100) device, is now available to the clinical laboratory as a possible alternative or supplement to the bleeding time test.

AIM

On behalf of the Platelet Physiology Subcommittee of the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH-SSC), a working Group was formed to review and make recommendations on the use of the PFA-100 CT in the evaluation of platelet function within the clinical laboratory.

METHODS

The Medline database was searched to review the published information on the PFA-100 CT in the evaluation of platelet disorders and platelet function. This information, and expert opinion, was used to prepare a report and generate consensus recommendations.

RESULTS

Although the PFA-100 CT is abnormal in some forms of platelet disorders, the test does not have sufficient sensitivity or specificity to be used as a screening tool for platelet disorders. A role of the PFA-100 CT in therapeutic monitoring of platelet function remains to be established.

CONCLUSIONS

The PFA-100 closure time should be considered optional in the evaluation of platelet disorders and function, and its use in therapeutic monitoring of platelet function is currently best restricted to research studies and prospective clinical trials.

Platelet hyper-function in acute coronary syndromes

Previous studies have demonstrated shortened bleeding times in patients with acute coronary syndromes, especially in myocardial infarction (MI). In this study we have investigated platelet hyper-function using the PFA-100 with collagen/adenosine diphosphate and collagen/epinephrine cartridges in 78 patients presenting with acute chest pain. Patients were classified into MI, unstable angina (UA) and non-specific chest pain. All patients received 300 mg aspirin (ASA) more than 2 h before blood samples were collected. Twenty healthy normal subjects were also tested before and 2 h after 300 mg ASA (n = 10). The collagen/adenosine diphosphate closure time was significantly shorter in MI patients (median, 71 s; P = 0.0237) but not in UA patients (median, 81 s; P > 0.05) compared with normal subjects (median, 92.5 s). The collagen/epinephrine closure times were significantly longer in UA patients (median, 233 s) than in untreated controls (median, 125 s; P < 0.0001), as expected, but there was no difference in MI patients (median, 149.24 s; P > 0.05), suggesting that the MI patients were not all responding to ASA. Analysis of a subset of the apparent ASA non-responders (n = 5) by platelet aggregation demonstrated that this was not related to failure of ASA to block cyclo-oxygenase activity. Von Willebrand factor levels were significantly elevated in both UA and MI patients compared with normal subjects (mean, 175.5 and 248.9 versus 89.1 s; P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0001, respectively) and were also significantly higher in the MI group compared with the UA group (P < 0.05). There is evidence for platelet hyper-function and elevated von Willebrand factor levels in the MI group that could explain their decreased responsiveness to ASA on the collagen/epinephrine cartridge.

Assessment of a platelet function analyser in horses: reference range and influence of a platelet aggregation inhibitor

The objective of this study was to assess whether a new human platelet function analyser (the PFA-100) could be used to evaluate platelet function in horses and detect acetylsalicylic acid (ASA)-induced platelet dysfunctions. Citrated blood samples from 40 healthy horses were processed to obtain reference values for closure time (CT) using cartridges with collagen-ADP (CT-ADP) and collagen-epinephrine (CT-EPI) as platelet agonists. In addition, CT-ADP and CT-EPI were also measured before and 24 h after oral ASA administration in another 12 healthy horses. The sensitivity and specificity of the test were also determined. In normal horses, means+/-SD value for CT-ADP was 85.1+/-13.1 s (median, 82 s), and CT-EPI ranged from 158 to >300 s (median 291 s). Calculated reference ranges were 60.5-115.9 s and 158.5->300 s for CT-ADP and CT-EPI, respectively. Administration of ASA significantly (P<0.001) prolonged CT-ADP values from 91.0+/-13 to 113.5+/-14.4 s, and CT-EPI values were also significantly (P<0.008) prolonged after ASA administration. Sensitivity and specificity results for ADP cartridges showed that a prolonged CT value would be highly suggestive of a platelet aggregation inhibition. In conclusion, ADP cartridges can be used in horses to assess primary haemostasis and may be a valuable test for the detection of platelet aggregation inhibition.

Aspirin Resistance and Atherothrombotic Disease

Acute coronary syndromes and other manifestations of atherothrombotic disease are primarily caused by atherosclerotic plaque rupture or fissuring and subsequent occlusive or subocclusive thrombus formation. Platelets play a critical role in the pathophysiology of atherothrombotic disease, and aspirin is the most commonly used antiplatelet agent. Clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of aspirin in both primary and secondary prevention of myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular death. Despite its proven benefit, the absolute risk of recurrent vascular events among patients taking aspirin remains relatively high, an estimated 8% to 18% after two years. Therapeutic resistance to aspirin might explain a portion of this risk. Although formal diagnostic criteria and a validated method of measurement are lacking, aspirin resistance may affect between 5% and 45% of the population. Given the prevalence of cardiovascular disease, the potential impact of aspirin resistance is large. Currently, however, there are many unanswered questions regarding the biological mechanism, diagnosis, population prevalence, clinical relevance, and optimal therapeutic intervention for aspirin resistance.

Aspirin Resistance: An Evaluation of Current Evidence and Measurement Methods

Aspirin resistance is a poorly characterized phenomenon, whereby certain patients do not benefit from the antithrombotic effect of aspirin. The frequency of aspirin resistance is unknown, but estimates range from 5-60%. The mechanism of aspirin resistance also is unknown; proposed mechanisms are poor patient compliance, poor aspirin absorption, increased isoprostane activity, platelet hypersensitivity to agonists, increased cyclooxygenase-2 activity, a cyclooxygenase-1 polymorphism, and the platelet alloantigen 2 polymorphism of platelet glycoprotein IIIa. Aspirin resistance appears to be dose related in some patients and therefore may be overcome with high doses. Evidence indicates that aspirin resistance is a dynamic state, with significant intrapatient variability in aspirin sensitivity with time. To date, a sensitive and specific assay of aspirin effect that reliably predicts treatment failure has not emerged. However, several commercially available products are being marketed for this purpose without convincing clinical data. Despite a wealth of literature on the topic, aspirin resistance remains an enigma. Further investigation is needed regarding strategies to identify and treat patients resistant to aspirin.

Aspirin and clopidogrel: efficacy, safety, and the issue of drug resistance

Aspirin and the thienopyridines ticlopidine and clopidogrel are antiplatelet agents that display good antithrombotic activity. In the past few years, the concept of aspirin resistance has been largely emphasized in the medical literature, although its definition is still uncertain. I suggest that "aspirin-resistant" should be considered as a description for those individuals in whom aspirin fails to inhibit thromboxane A2 production, irrespective of the results of unspecific tests of platelet function, such as the bleeding time, platelet aggregation, or the PFA-100 system. Less well known than aspirin resistance, but certainly better characterized, is the issue of "clopidogrel resistance," which is probably mostly caused by inefficient metabolism of the prodrug clopidogrel to its active metabolite. At present, aspirin and clopidogrel resistance should not be looked for in the clinical setting, because there is no definite demonstration of an association with clinical events conditioning cost-effective changes in patient management.

High incidence of defective high-shear platelet function among platelet donors

BACKGROUND

Because single-donor plateletpheresis concentrates now account for a large percentage of PLT concentrates, the PLT quality of individual donations is increasingly important. There has been little previous work on PLT function in blood donors.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of defective PLT function among 100 healthy UK PLT donors on 3 consecutive donation days. Citrated blood samples were taken before plateletpheresis. High-shear PLT function testing was performed by a PLT function analyzer (PFA-100, Dade Behring), within both collagen-ADP (CADP) and collagen-epinephrine (CEPI) cartridges.

RESULTS

Sixteen percent of PLT donors (mainly over the 3 donating days) had prolonged CEPI closure times (CTs) only, indicative of an aspirin-like pattern; 9 percent had a severe defect with prolonged CEPI CTs between 200 and 300 seconds, and 4 percent had maximal CEPI CTs of greater than 300 seconds. The majority of prolonged CEPI CTs appeared transient in nature.

CONCLUSION

PLT dysfunction as detected by the PFA-100 is surprisingly common within a voluntary PLT donor population. The majority of CEPI defects appeared transient in nature and are indicative of surreptitious intake of cyclooxygenase inhibitors (e.g., aspirin). Identification of defective PLT function within donors would provide a simple means to eradicate defective PLTs from being clinically utilized.

Impaired platelet inhibitory effect of a single dose of acetylsalicylic acid in patients with unstable coronary artery syndrome in comparison with healthy volunteers

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Controversial reports have been published about the efficiency of potent platelet inhibitors in patients with coronary artery syndrome (CAS). We therefore questioned whether a functional change in platelets affects the patient's response to ASA.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Nineteen consecutive patients presenting with unstable coronary syndrome and 15 healthy volunteers were included. No platelet inhibitory drugs or coumarin were used in either group before the study. Platelet aggregation tests were performed on baseline samples and after a single dose of ASA. Afterwards, all patients underwent coronary angiography to exclude non-CAS.

RESULTS

In the patient group (n=15 after exclusion) no significant increase in bleeding constant was found after ASA, using a PFA analyser, in contrast to the control group. The maximal velocity and the maximal percentage optical platelet aggregation using ADP was significantly more reduced in the control group. ASA did not significantly reduce the thromboxane B₂ production in the patient group.

CONCLUSION

ASA has less platelet inhibitory effects in patients with unstable CAS in comparison with healthy volunteers. Platelets, in the hyperactive state of unstable CAS, prove to be less subject to inhibition. This might add to the explanation of the lack of efficiency of platelet inhibitory drugs to prevent thrombotic complications after PTCA and platelet aggregation onto stent surfaces in patients with acute CAS.

In vitro aspirin resistance detected by PFA-100 closure time: pivotal role of plasma von Willebrand factor

The in vitro closure time (CT), determined by the Platelet Function Analyzer (PFA-100), is used to monitor patients treated with aspirin. A relatively high percentage of in vitro aspirin resistance was reported despite an adequate inhibition of platelet response to arachidonic acid and we investigated whether high plasma levels of von Willebrand factor ristocetin cofactor activity (vWF:RCo) may contribute to this profile. Platelet aggregation test, CT [collagen adrenaline (CEPI-CT) and collagen adenosine 5'-diphosphate (ADP) (CADP-CT)], and vWF:RCo levels were evaluated in 55 consecutive patients receiving aspirin (75-250 mg/d) versus 32 untreated control subjects. All the aspirin-treated patients showed platelet aggregation responses that reflected the aspirin intake. However, CT data analysis enabled aspirin good-responder (GR) and aspirin bad-responder (BR) patients to be identified. All GR group subjects (n = 27), had a CEPI-CT and a CADP-CT longer than 300 s and 96 s respectively. The BR group (n = 28) had CEPI-CT values below 200 s and all CADP-CT were in the normal range (77 +/- 19 s). Interestingly, the BR plasma vWF:RCo levels were significantly higher (159 +/- 43%) than those of the GR group (121 +/- 34%) (P < 0.01), which were similar to control values (114 +/- 31%). A negative correlation between vWF:RCo and CT values was established. We demonstrate that in vitro aspirin-resistance, revealed by PFA-100 CT prolongation failure, is correlated to increased plasmatic vWF:RCo levels, reinforcing its particular importance in PFA-100 cartridges performance.

Utility of in vitro closure time test for evaluating platelet-related primary hemostasis in dialysis patients

BACKGROUND

The platelet aggregation and skin bleeding time (SBT) tests currently used for assessment of hemostasis impairment in dialysis patients have important disadvantages. The authors explored the utility of a novel in vitro closure time test (PFA-100, platelet function analyzer) in which the process of platelet adhesion and aggregation after vascular injury is simulated in vitro in dialysis patients.

METHODS

Thirty-four long-term dialysis patients were included in the study with 30 healthy volunteers as the control group. In vitro closure time was compared with results from the platelet aggregation and SBT tests.

RESULTS

In vitro closure time identified more patients and fewer controls with hemostasis impairment. In the patient group, 60%, 40%, and 20%, and in the control group, 0%, 10% and 3% of persons were found to have hemostasis impairment as determined by in vitro closure time, platelet aggregation, and SBT, respectively. In addition, values for patients and controls were significantly different for in vitro closure time (P < 0.05) but not for platelet aggregation or SBT. Thus, closure time appears to be more sensitive and specific than the other 2 tests. No correlation was found between the 3 tests, either in patients or in controls. However, a high correlation (r = 0.73; P < 0.0001) was found between the 2 types of in vitro closure time test (collagen/epinephrine [CEPI] and collagen/adenosine diphosphate [CADP]) in patients and controls.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that in vitro closure time can be a useful test for detecting platelet-related primary hemostasis defects in dialysis patients.

Monitoring aspirin 100 mg and clopidogrel 75 mg therapy with the PFA-100 device in patients with peripheral arterial disease

A tool to identify vascular patients who receive antiplatelet therapy nd to distinguish between responders and non-responders to antiplatelet therapy could be of clinical importance. The present observational study was designed to investigate whether the PFA-100 device (Dade Behring) is suitable to detect long-term therapy of aspirin (100 mg/d) and/or clopidogrel (75 mg/d) in a cohort of patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). A total of 150 consecutive patients with PAD were studied; 34 patients were excluded from the study due to irregular intake of antiplatelet therapy or due to method limitations. Of the remaining 116 patients, 42 had no antiplatelet therapy, 47 had daily aspirin (100 mg) intake, 19 were administered clopidogrel 75 mg daily, and 10 received a medication with 100 mg aspirin plus clopidogrel 75 mg daily, all for at least 10 days. Nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test with post hoc comparisons showed that collagen plus epinephrine (CEPI) closure times of the patient group receiving aspirin and the group receiving aspirin plus clopidogrel were similar (p>0.05). In contrast, both patient groups exhibited prolonged CEPI values compared to patients without antiplatelet therapy and patients taking clopidogrel (p<0.001). Finally, both patients without antiplatelet therapy and patients with clopidogrel did not show marked differences with respect to their CEPI values (p>0.05). However, Kruskal-Wallis test results revealed that collagen plus adenosine-5'-diphosphate closure times were not significantly different in all four patient groups (p=0.257). In conclusion, the PFA-100 device may be a suitable tool for monitoring aspirin 100 mg therapy, but it is not appropriate for the detection of clopidogrel administration in its current setup. Although it appears plausible that patients with PAD could benefit from monitoring platelet inhibition, clear evidence for this concept is still lacking.

Clinical application of the PFA-100

The PFA-100 (platelet function analyzer) is a relatively new tool for the investigation of primary hemostasis. Recent studies have shown its utility as a screening tool for investigating possible von Willebrand disorder (VWD) and various platelet disorders. More recently, the PFA-100 has been shown to be valuable in monitoring desmopressin acetate (DDAVP) therapy in both VWD and platelet disorders. The PFA-100 has also been evaluated in many other studies for its utility in assessing drug effects, for potential monitoring of antiplatelet medication (including aspirin), or for evaluation of overall primary hemostasis in various clinical disorders or during surgical procedures. This article reviews current findings and highlights the benefits and limitations of the clinical utility of the PFA-100. Ultimately, the greatest strengths of the PFA-100 are its simplicity of use and excellent sensitivity to particular hemostatic disturbances such as VWD, platelet disorders, and platelet-affecting medication. However, because it is thus a global test system, this also creates a significant limitation because the PFA-100 is not specific for, nor predictive of, any particular disorder. However, used appropriately, the PFA-100 can be considered a worthwhile addition to any hemostasis laboratory involved in the diagnosis or therapeutic monitoring of bleeding disorders and potentially of antiplatelet medication. This review should be valuable to both hemostasis scientists and clinical specialists.

The PFA-100: a potential rapid screening tool for the assessment of platelet dysfunction

The PFA-100 is a device that simulates high shear dependent platelet function in vitro and thus is particularly useful for screening for von Willebrand's disease (VWD). The aim of this study was to assess the overall potential of the PFA-100 as a primary clinical screening tool using the wide spectrum of clinical samples assessed for platelet function within our institution. The PFA-100 test was performed using both collagen/ADP (CADP) and collagen/epinephrine (CEPI) cartridges on samples from 337 patients with a wide variety of haemostatic defects. One hundred and eighty-two patients were defined as having normal platelet function based on classical laboratory tests and von Willebrand factor levels. The overall clinical sensitivity of the PFA-100 for platelet abnormalities (including VWD) was 81% for CADP and 86% for CEPI. The overall specificity was found to be 82% for CADP and 80% for CEPI. When utilizing both cartridges in combination (with both results either higher or lower than the upper cutoff of the normal ranges), the overall false positive and false negative rates were 12% and 6%, respectively. The PFA-100 proved to be sensitive in detecting classical defects by giving prolonged closure times in samples from patients with major platelet function defects (e.g. von Willebrand's disease, Glanzmann's thrombasthenia and Bernard Soulier syndrome). However, there were a small number of false negative results (6%) obtained with various milder platelet defects (e.g. Hermansky Pudlak syndrome, storage pool and release defects, type I VWD and macrothrombocytopenia). The PFA-100 test provides a useful rapid screening tool and should increase the efficiency and reduce the cost of the routine diagnosis of platelet dysfunction.